54
Resonance In the Solar System Steve Bache UNC Wilmington Dept. of Physics and Physical Oceanography Advisor : Dr. Russ Herman Spring 2012

Resonance In the Solar Systemuncw.edu/phy/documents/BachePHY495.pdf · Resonance In the Solar System Steve Bache UNC Wilmington Dept. of Physics and Physical Oceanography Advisor

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Resonance In the SolarSystem

Steve Bache

UNC WilmingtonDept. of Physics and Physical Oceanography

Advisor : Dr. Russ Herman

Spring 2012

Goal

• numerically investigate the dynamics of the asteroid belt

• relate old ideas to new methods

• reproduce known results

History

The role of science:

• make sense of the world

• perceive order out of apparent randomness

• the sky and heavenly bodies

History

The role of science:

• make sense of the world

• perceive order out of apparent randomness

• the sky and heavenly bodies

Anaximander (611-547 BC)• Greek philosopher, scientist• stars, moon, sun 1:2:3

Figure: Anaximander’s Model

Pythagoras (570-495 BC)

• Mathematician, philosopher, started a religion

• all heavenly bodies at whole number ratios

• ”Harmony of the spheres”

Figure: Pythagorean Model

Tycho Brahe (1546-1601)

• Danishastronomer,alchemist

• accurateastronomicalobservations, notelescope

• importance ofdata collection

Johannes Kepler (1571-1631)

• Brahe’s assistant

• Used detailed data provided by Brahe

• Observations led to Laws of Planetary Motion

• orbits are ellipses• equal area in equal time• T 2 ∝ a3

Johannes Kepler (1571-1631)

• Brahe’s assistant

• Used detailed data provided by Brahe

• Observations led to Laws of Planetary Motion• orbits are ellipses• equal area in equal time• T 2 ∝ a3

Kepler’s Model

• Astrologer, Harmonices Mundi• Used empirical data to formulate laws

Figure: Kepler’s Model

Isaac Newton (1642-1727)

• religious, yet desired a physical mechanism to explain Kepler’slaws

• contributions to mathematics and science• Principia• almost entirety of an undergraduate physics degree• Law of Universal Gravitation

~F12 = −G m1m2

|r12|2r12.

Resonance

• Transition from ratios/ integer spacing to more physicaldescription, resonance plays a key role in celestial mechanics

• Commensurability

The property of two orbiting objects, such as planets, satellites, orasteroids, whose orbital periods are in a rational proportion.

• ResonanceOrbital resonances occur when the mean motions of two or morebodies are related by close to an integer ratio of their orbitalperiods

Resonance

• Transition from ratios/ integer spacing to more physicaldescription, resonance plays a key role in celestial mechanics

• Commensurability

The property of two orbiting objects, such as planets, satellites, orasteroids, whose orbital periods are in a rational proportion.

• ResonanceOrbital resonances occur when the mean motions of two or morebodies are related by close to an integer ratio of their orbitalperiods

Resonance

• Transition from ratios/ integer spacing to more physicaldescription, resonance plays a key role in celestial mechanics

• Commensurability

The property of two orbiting objects, such as planets, satellites, orasteroids, whose orbital periods are in a rational proportion.

• ResonanceOrbital resonances occur when the mean motions of two or morebodies are related by close to an integer ratio of their orbitalperiods

Examples

• Pluto-Neptune 2:3

• Ganymede-Europa-Io 1:2:4

ExamplesCassini division in Saturn’s rings1:2 Resonance with Mimas

Figure: Cassini Divison

Kirkwood Gaps

Daniel Kirkwood (1886)

Kirkwood Gaps

• Commensurability in the orbital periods cause an ejection byJupiter

• explanation provided by Kirkwood, using 100 asteroids

• now thought to exhibit chaotic change in eccentricity

My Goal

• To create a simulation of the interactions of Jupiter, the Sun,and ’test’ asteroids

• Integrate Newton’s equations of motion in MATLAB over alarge time span (≈ 1MY )

Requirements

1 an idea for what causes orbital resonance

2 an appropriate integrating scheme

3 initial conditions for all bodies being considered

• Start with the Kepler problem

Requirements

1 an idea for what causes orbital resonance

2 an appropriate integrating scheme

3 initial conditions for all bodies being considered

• Start with the Kepler problem

Kepler Problem

• The problem of two bodies interacting only by a central forceis known as the Kepler Problem

• Also known as the 2-body problem

Kepler Problem

m1r1 = Gm1m2

r212= G

m1m2(r1 − r2)

r312

m2r2 = Gm1m2

r212= G

m1m2(r2 − r1)

r312

Center of Mass is stationary/ moves at constant velocity

Classic treatment

r2 − r1 = r

r + µr

r3= 0

G (m1 + m2) = µ

Classic treatment

Considering motion of m2 with respect to m1 gives:

r× r = 0,

which, integrating once, gives

r × r = h

This implies that

the motion in the two-body problem lies in a plane.

Treat this relative motion in polar coordinates (r,θ).

Polar form

Using,

r = r r

r = r r + r θθ

r = (r − r θ)r +

[1

r

d

dt(r2θ)

]θ,

one finds the solution:

r(θ) =p

1 + e cos(θ),

where p = h2

µ .

Elliptical Orbit

Figure: Axes of an ellipse, Eccentricity = ca

Kepler’s Laws

1 The motion of m2 is an ellipse with m1 at one focus

2dAdt = h

2 = constant

Figure: Kepler’s 2nd Law

Kepler’s third law

• From Kepler’s second law, we have dAdt = h

2 .

• area of ellipse = A = πab

• τ = AdAdt

3 τ2 = 4π2a3

µ , or τ2 ∝ a3.

N-Body Problem

• no analyticalsolutions forN > 2

• computationalmethods →Euler’s method,Runge-Kutta

• need a bettermethod

N-Body Problem

• no analyticalsolutions forN > 2

• computationalmethods →Euler’s method,Runge-Kutta

• need a bettermethod

System

• N bodies - Sun, Jupiter, asteroids

• centralized force

• kinetic and potential energies independent

• Hamiltonian system

Hamiltonian Formulation

H(q, p) = T (p) + U(q)

q =∂H

∂p

p =−∂H∂q

N-Body Hamiltonian

• Hamiltonian is separable, i.e. H = H(q, p, t) = T (p) + U(q)

T =1

2

n∑i=1

p2imi

U = −N∑i=2

i−1∑j=1

Gmimj

|q1 − qj |

N-Body Hamiltonian

• from Hamilton equations:

qi = ∇piH =pimi

pi = ∇qiH = −Gmi

n∑j 6=i

mj(qi − qj)

|qi − qj |3

Numerical Scheme

• best approach → symplectic integrator

• designed for solutions to Hamiltonian systems

• preserves volume in phase space

Derivation

To derive the simplectic integrator to be used, compose Eulermethod map

qi+1 = qi + dt∇piH

pi+1 = pi − dt∇qi+1H

with its adjointpi+1 = pi − dt∇qiH

qi+1 = qi + dt∇pi+1H

by introducing a ”half time step” i + 12 of size dt

2 .

Derivation

New integrating scheme is now

qi+ 12

= qi +dt

2∇piH

pi+1 = pi − dt∇qi+1

2

H

qi+1 = qi+ 12

+dt

2∇pi+1H.

Leapfrog Algorithm

• additional half time-step transforms Euler’s method tosymplectic integrator

• more stable over long integrations

• angular momentum is preserved explicitly

• a simple test of the Leapfrog integrator →

Leapfrog Algorithm

• additional half time-step transforms Euler’s method tosymplectic integrator

• more stable over long integrations

• angular momentum is preserved explicitly

• a simple test of the Leapfrog integrator →

Leapfrog Test

Figure: Theoretical Solution

Leapfrog Test

Figure: Numerical Solution

So far...

• semi-major axis/ orbital period relationship necessary forresonance

• appropriate integrating scheme

Unresolved...

• Initial conditions for Sun, Jupiter, asteroids

Initial Conditions

• Positions• sun at origin• Jupiter at aphelion• asteroids at perihelion

• Velocities (from r · r)

v2 = µ

[2

r− 1

a

]

Model

• Integrate orbits of the Sun, Jupiter, and five asteroids

• range of initial semi-major axes, e = 0.15

• initial postions• Sun at origin• Jupiter at aphelion• asteroids at perihelion

• calculate eccentricities and semi-major axis

Results

Figure: 3:1 Resonance - 10K Jupiter Years - ∆t = 10.83 days

Results

Figure: 3:1 Resonance - 10K Jupiter Years - ∆t = 10.83 days

Results

Figure: 3:1 Resonance - 100K Jupiter Years - ∆t = 10.83 days

Results

Figure: 3:1 Resonance - 100K Jupiter Years - ∆t = 10.83 days

Results

Figure: 3:1 Resonance - 100K → 200K Jupiter Years - ∆t = 10.83 days

Results

Figure: 3:1 Resonance - 100K → 200K Jupiter Years - ∆t = 10.83 days

Further Abstraction

Conclusion

• resonances play a key role

• unite pre-scientific revolution → modern science

• increased computational power → insights into developmentof solar system

References

1 Meteorites may follow a chaotic route to Earth, Wisdom,Nature 315, 731-733 (27 June 1985)

2 The origin of the Kirkwood gaps - A mapping for asteroidalmotion near the 3/1 commensurability, Wisdom, AstronomicalJournal, vol 87, Mar. 1982

3 Numerical Investigation of Chaotic Motion in the AsteroidBelt, Danya Rose, University of Sydney Honours Thesis,November 2008

4 Motion of Asteroids at the Kirkwood Gaps, MakotoYoshikawa, Icarus, Vol. 87, 1990

5 The role of chaotic resonances in the Solar System, N. Murrayand M. Holman, Nature, vol. 410, 12 April 2001

6 Introduction to Celestial Mechanics, Jean Kovalevsky, D.Reidel, 1967

7 Classical Mechanics, John R. Taylor