10

Click here to load reader

Report_Public Forum on Good Governance

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Report_Public Forum on Good Governance

Citation preview

  • 1

    THE COMMISSION ON ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE

    Office of the Ombudsman

    Hata Mnyonge ana Haki

    REPORT OF THE PUBLIC FORUM ON GOOD GOVERNANCE

    THE HILTON HOTEL, NAIROBI

    27TH MARCH 2015

  • 2

    TABLEOFCONTENTS1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................32.0 BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................................33.0 JUSTIFICATION.....................................................................................................................................44.0 OBJECTIVES.........................................................................................................................................45.0 TARGET AUDIENCE.............................................................................Error!Bookmarknotdefined.6.0 EXPECTED OUTCOMES......................................................................Error!Bookmarknotdefined.7.0 SESSIONS AND THE PANELISTS..........................................................Error!Bookmarknotdefined.8.0 EMERGING ISSUES..............................................................................................................................59.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................7

  • 3

    1.0 INTRODUCTION

    On 27th March 2015, the Commission on Administrative Justice (Office of the Ombudsman) convened a half day Public Forum on Good Governance to discuss the nature and extent of corruption, impunity and maladministration, and propose solutions to these problems. The Forum drew participation from key stakeholders in the governance sector, both government and non-governmental, and members of the public.

    2.0 BACKGROUND The adoption of the Constitution in August 2010 marked a major turning point in the history of Kenya.The Constitution, which created the Second Republic, has transformed the governance structure and relations in the country thereby crystallizing good governance and constitutionalism. In addition, the Constitution has strengthened accountability mechanisms and renewed the policy, legal and institutional frameworks for sustainable development. A notable development is the tacit description, indeed, prescription of the concept of sovereignty of the people, national values and principles of governance, leadership and integrity and creation of institutions supporting good governance. Notwithstanding the above prescriptions, Kenya has recently been faced with governance challenges that have threatened its very foundation and prompted public debate on the need for enforcement of the Constitution. Notably, Kenya has recently had unprecedented incidences of maladministration, corruption and impunity, which point to the possibility of poor governance. Whereas public debate is healthy, it is worth noting that there has been no formal and organised platform of engagement affording key stakeholders an opportunity to engage and come up with a consolidated approach to tackling the challenges. For this reason, efforts of stakeholders have been lost in informal public debate. It is on this premise, that the Commission convened the Public Forum on Good Governance to provide the much needed space for engagement on these governance issues and chart the way forward.

  • 4

    3.0 JUSTIFICATION Governance is a key determinant for growth, development and poverty alleviation. The question of governance, therefore, determines the ability of any country to deliver services to its people, as well as the quality of those services. In the context of governance, transparency and accountability are some of the hallmarks of a functional democracy. It is in this regard that the Constitution of Kenya has placed premium on good governance, as discernible in its substantive and structural frameworks. For instance, the Preamble provides thus a government based on the essential values of human rights, equality, freedom, democracy, social justice and the rule of law. This is further supported by the national values and principles of governance under Article 10 of which the rule of law, participation of the people, human rights, good governance, integrity, transparency and accountability are part. Further prescriptions of accountability, transparency and acceptable standards of behaviour in public sector are found under various provisions, including Chapters Four, Six and Thirteen of the Constitution. The enforcement of these provisions has been bestowed upon a number of institutions, notably the three arms of government and the constitutional commissions and independent offices. In performing their functions, these bodies are required to work closely and complement each other. The public, too, have a role to play in ensuring good governance. Corruption, impunity and maladministration are some of the major obstacles to the realisation of good governance in Kenya. They undermine the ability to deliver services and erode public trust in government and its agencies. It is, therefore, not only important but necessary to find ways of nip them in the bud. Charged with the responsibility of enforcing administrative justice in the public sector by addressing maladministration, and promoting good governance and protecting the sovereignty of the people, the Commission organised a public forum to discuss issues ailing governance in Kenya, as an entry point in addressing these challenges.

    4.0 OBJECTIVES The main objective of the Forum was to provide a platform for engagement with the public and various stake-holders to examine the nature and extent of corruption, impunity and maladministration, and chart the way forward. Specifically, the Forum aimed at achieving the following objectives: To provide a platform for exploring ways of addressing maladministration, corruption and impunity in Kenya.

  • 5

    To create a common understanding of the mandates of key institutions in governance and their place in addressing bad governance. To guide debate on maladministration, corruption and impunity for proactive participation by the public. To explore ways and manner of collaboration among the institutions of governance in addressing bad governance.

    5.0 THE FORUM

    The Forum was designed to focus on three major issues in the context of the theme, Good Governance. First, was the appreciation of the context through a situation analysis. Second, was the interrogation of the institutional efficacy, approaches and remedies, and lastly, the way forward. The Forum underscored the fact that poor governance and lack of accountability and transparency manifest themselves in corruption. Corruption is a blight on development wherever it occurs, and contributes to the perpetuation of social and economic inequities. There was also an appreciation of the move by President Uhuru Kenyatta to begin to address corruption in Government. The President on 26th March 2015 in his Annual State of the Nation Address, directed that any officials adversely mentioned in a confidential Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission Report should step aside to pave way for further investigations and possible prosecution.

    5.1. EMERGING ISSUES The following issues emerged from the deliberations.

    1) Chapter Six of the Constitution was noted to be the least successfully

    implemented. The Chapter which deals with issues of integrity and leadership was noted to have been constantly abused by both the leaders and the citizens.

    2) Democracy is about transparency and accountability in Government. Corruption and maladministration have been and remain to be the major scourge preventing economic growth and stability in Kenya. They are

  • 6

    barriers to national development - infrastructural growth, trade and investment and erosion of societal moral fabric.

    3) Corruption and maladministration are closely related to ethnicity, the enemy of national unity and good governance.

    4) Devolution was mainly associated with decentralisation of power and resources to the counties. However, it was noted that although devolution was good, it had been abused as corruption was rampant in the devolved units.

    5) A major constraint in fighting corruption was delayed action on corruption cases and failure to prosecute those implicated in corruption thereby perpetuating the culture of impunity.

    6) The anti-corruption and anti-maladministration agencies and public

    oversight authorities were undermined by inadequate political will and limited resources. This in turn affected their performance thereby undermining good governance.

    7) The Public Audit Bill then pending before Parliament was in contravention of Article 249(2) (b) of the Constitution. Clause 40 of the Bill prohibits the Auditor General from making public particular information in a public report if it would prejudice the security, defense or international relations of the Government of the Republic of Kenya. It was noted that this would restrict the functioning of the Auditor General and impede good governance.

    8) The problem of land grabbing of both public and private land was a manifestation of challenges in the governance system. It was noted that those implicated in land grabbing scandals were still holding public offices and unpunished.

    9) Lack of prosecutorial powers by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission was identified as one of the reasons for rampant corruption in Kenya. This issue was, however, hotly contested with some members opining that EACC does not need prosecutorial powers. A different thinking on the matter was that civic education on issues of integrity and governance was the solution to engender an informed public.

    10) The threat by the Executive to control institutions such as the civil society organizations and the Media was identified as a challenge to good governance.

  • 7

    11) It was noted that the protection accorded to whistleblowers was

    inadequate, and had non-reporting of corruption and other malpractices.

    12) Access to information on certain public institutions was a big challenge as some were closed and others had outdated information, which undermined public participation on issues that affected them.

    13) Those implicated in corruption scandals should not only step aside pending investigations, but also resign or be removed from office.

    14) It was noted that a number of public officers implicated in corruption usually rushed to court to stop lawful action against them. Worse still, such cases took long to be concluded. This undermined the principle of separation of powers where such action was vested in a particular State Organ, and the efforts towards good governance.

    6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

    Maladministration, Corruption and Impunity continue to thrive despite various measures put in place to curb the vices. In order to deal with these unsavory and unethical practices, the following recommendations were made:

    1) There is need to re -examine the entire legislative framework and identify the gaps in the laws that establish oversight agencies in order to seal the loopholes to make the agencies be effective.

    2) There is need for a national campaign and civic education to educate the public on corruption and maladministration.

    3) Institutions mandated to oversee the implementation of Chapter Six of the Constitution need to hold each other to account with regard to aspects within their respective mandates.

    4) There is need to have a single government integrity coordinating agency to co-ordinate integrity matters. In addition, the oversight institutions should build an inter-agency co-operation and collaboration.

    5) The Judiciary should be bold and clear in determining integrity matters and it should define the bare minimum standards. Further judicial officers who preside over corruption matters should be taken through specialised training on corruption.

  • 8

    6) The IEBC must enforce its powers under Article 88 to vet those interested in elective posts.

    7) Conduct of lifestyle audits for State and Public Officers need to be done and enforced through legislation. Illegally acquired wealth should be confisticated.

    8) In light of the scourge of corruption and maladministration the relevant legislation needs to be amended to negate the presumption of innocence in such matters.

    9) There should be timelines for action on reports and recommendations by oversight institutions.

    10) Stiff penalties and sanctions should be meted out to public officers who have been charged with corruption and maladministration.

    11) There is need to overhaul the Companies Act as the loopholes therein create an enabling environment for corruption.

    12) Harness technology to ensure corruption is reported and promptly acted upon.

    13) There is need to review the law on the protection of whistleblowers. 14) Laws on election financing should be reviewed. Every political leader

    should be required to file a budget on all electoral heads and account for the money spent.

    15) The National Anti-Corruption Policy should be developed to guide the anti-corruption activities in the country.

    16) Investigators in corruption related cases should conduct thorough, investigations for effective prosecution and adjudication.

    17) National Integrity Systems should be formed and values inculcated from an early educational level.

    18) Efforts should be made towards ensuring that Chapter Six of the Constitution is self enforcing.

    19) Parliament should enact a Politicians Code of Conduct and institute processes to have undisciplined politicians dealt with.

    20) The Judiciary should be held to account in as far as upholding the Constitution is concerned. The prohibitive rule requiring one to deposit a sum of Ksh. 1,000,000 before approaching the Supreme Court in relation to Presidential elections should be repealed since it undermined good governance.

    21) A list of shame bearing the names of those people accused of integrity violations should be published regularly.

  • 9

    Hata Mnyonge Ana Haki

    PUBLIC FORUM ON GOOD GOVERNANCE

    27TH MARCH 2015

    VENUE: HILTON HOTEL, NAIROBI

    TIME: 8.00AM 1.00PM

    MODERATOR: DR. OTIENDE AMOLLO, EBS CHAIRPERSON, COMMISSION ON ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE

    TIME SESSION

    8.00- 9.00a.m Arrival and Registration

    Situation Analysis

    9.00 10.00a.m Hon. Abdikadir Mohamed, Senior Constitutional & Legislative Advisor to the President Mr. M. A. Ogolla - Office of the Controller of Budget Mr Humphrey Wanyama, Deputy Auditor General Mr Samuel Kimeu, Director, Transparency International (Kenya) Mr George Kegoro, Executive Director, International Commission of Jurists (Kenya)

    Institutional Efficacy, Approaches and Remedies

    10.00 11.00a.m. Hon. Sen. Amos Wako, Chairman, Senate Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Cmmr. Mumo Matemu, Chairperson, Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission Mr Jacob Ondari, Deputy Director, Public Prosecutions and Head of County Affairs & Regulatory Prosecutions Mr Ndungu Wainaina, Executive Director, International Centre for Policy and Conflict

    Way Forward

    11.00a.m. 1.00p.m Prof. PLO Lumumba, Director, Kenya School of Law

  • 10

    Ms Lilian Omondi, Vice Chairperson, Law Society of Kenya

    Ms Atsango Chesoni, Executive Director, Kenya Human Rights Commission