Upload
kiran-chopra
View
139
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SUBMITTED BY:
NAVIN KUMARENROLMENT NUMBER # 947151143STUDY CENTRE # VMC, NEW DELHI
REGIONAL CENTRE # ITO, NEW DELHI
SUBMITTED TO:
SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIESINDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY
MAIDAN GARHINEW DELHI.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project aims at analyzing the strategies adopted by various players in
cement industry – their structure, strategies that led to their growth, trends and
various issues related to it vis-à-vis the present day macro environment. The first
part of the study focusses on the cement industry as a whole, whereas the
second part focusses on the strategies adopted by Associated Cement
Companies (ACC) which is one of the major players in the cement industry.
The first part of the project deals with the growth of the cement industry, its
present scenario, the various forces acting on it and the various strategies that
the players are taking up to cope with the changing dynamic environment.
The cement industry is going through a crucial phase of recession owing to
several factors, which have been dealt with in detail. Despite the projections of
huge investments in the infrastructure sector, actual funding during the year was
rather meagre. This has resulted in recession in key industries such as steel and
cement. The lower-than anticipated demand, coupled with addition in capacities
during the year, had increased competition in the market. Though the input costs
were higher, with the added competition prices began to fall and pressures on
margins rose.
Although the industry is presently in a dire state, still there is a tremendous
potential for growth of this industry in the near future. Various strategies have
been discussed which are visible in the industry nowadays, the prominent among
them being acquisitions and mergers. The spate of takeovers in the industry puts
a question mark on its future. These acquisitions are giving promising returns to
the stakeholders in terms of:
A good cement plant at a very cheap price owing to the rock bottom prices of
the scrips.
Gain in terms of accelerated revenue generation.
Advantage in terns of selecting an appropriate location since the assessment
of the market, limestone quality, and competition is available on hand and the
risk of setting up a new plant is reduced.
In the light of the above discussions, I have studied Associated Cement
Companies (ACC group) in terms of its position, business, performance, and
implementing strategies in terms of expansion and modernization. The company
has been analyzed using Porter’s five forces model, which shows the position of
the company with respect to the factors in the environment, which influence the
capability of an organization to position itself to such advantage.
INTRODUCTION
Introduction on Indian Cement Industry
Cement is one of the core industries, which plays a vital role in the
growth of a nation. India ranks fifth among the cement producing
countries in the world. The present per capita cement consumption is
around 84kg, which is much lower than the per capita consumption of
the developed countries.
Recent Government pronouncements indicate that, the per capita
consumption will increase to 120 kg in the next three years.
With the tremendous growth potential projected, there has been and
will be a tremendous increase in the number of cement plants. The
cement industry is also highly energy intensive, with more than 40% of
the manufacturing cost being contributed by energy.
With this growth & increasing competitiveness and the increasing gap
between demand and supply of energy, there is an imperative need to
operate in an energy efficient manner. The best method to achieve this
energy efficient operation is, to incorporate energy efficiency at the
design stage itself.
The various energy conservation aspects to be considered, while
designing a new cement plant/upgrading an existing plant are
discussed. The electrical energy saving aspects are covered under the
following different headings
Mines, Crusher & Stacking
Mill
Blending and homogenisation
Kiln and cooler
Coal mill
Cement mill
Packing plant
Others
The thermal energy consumption in the cement plant is only in kiln
section. Thermal energy is also occasionally used in the hot air furnace
for drying of coal in the coal mill and for drying of slag/fly-ash in
cement mill.
The energy saving aspects and the specific energy consumption
figures mentioned is applicable to dry process pre-calciner plants of
more than 1500 TPD capacity.
The production technology has went up by leaps and bounds and many
modern million tonne cement plants have come up with world class
standards in productivity, quality, low energy consumption and
environment friendliness. Cement industry has had some problems of
infrastructure deficiencies in the areas of availability of good coke in
adequate quantity, movement by rail for both coal and cement, and
power from gird. These are threatening to become serious enough to
affect the healthy growth of the industry and call for early attention.
While the quality of the product at the manufacturing end can be world
class, consumer does not get the benefit of the same quality at his
since packing ,distribution and usage are still far below the best
practices in the world. There is need to introduce movement and
distribution of cement in bulk. This is cheaper and environment
friendly. The Consumer who is looking for concrete as the end product
is best served with high quality of service by bulk cement being
converted directly into Ready Mixed Concrete (RMC) of desired quality
and strength at his doorstep without the necessity of site mixing,
causing pollution and urban congestion.
BACKGROUND: THE CEMENT INDUSTRY
The winds of liberalisation have swept aside technological barriers age
old monopolistic practises introduced healthy competition in the
market and above all, the given the consumer a wider range of choice.
The cement industry was one of the few industries to be liberalised in
the 1980’s the government partially decontrolled the cement industry
in 1982. This act generated tremendous interest and within a decade
nearly 30 Mn tones capacity was added to the existing cement
production rate. This improved the availability of cement which
checked price rise and finally lead to improvement of the quality of
cement.
Till the year 1990-91, the demand for cement was mainly dependent
on government spending. The era of liberalisation brought with itself
novel ways of conducting business. It welcomed foreign investment
and technology into the Indian industry. The entry of the private
sectors into infrastructures and having development further helped in
reducing the dependence on government spending for purchase of
cement.
The country’s present per capita cement consumption is now at around
84 kg compared to the world average of 250 kg as compared to that of
the developing countries with their average being 150 kg . This leaves
a large scope for rapid and continued growth.
Today the infrastructures sectors is attracting huge private and foreign
investments for mega projects such as irrigation, power houses, roads,
railway bridges, housing and commercial establishments. This is
further expected to boost the increase in demand for cement at a
much faster pace.
There has been a spurt in construction activities in the Middle East and
Asian countries to add to the constantly rising demand in the
neighboring countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and
Myanmar.
Inspire of fragmentation along regional lines due to high freight costs,
regional disparities on growth, increase in cost of petroleum, coal,
power tariffs resulting into highest cost of production and cut throat
completion, the outlook for the industry seems to be bright in view of
the boom in construction activities, industrial growth and the
governments commitment to boost infrastructure development.
A plethora of schemes have been launched by the competitors and
special attention has been given to packing, prompt delivery,
advertising campaign and sales production activities for early
penetration and acceptance of their brand in the market Mason’s
conferences, seminars and exhibitions are held for retails stockiest,
dealers and architects to promote sales and distribution activities.
On the ecological front pollution being a major concern stringent
measure are taken to maintain the delicate ecological balance of the
nature and to prevent deterioration of the environment modern
technological equipment like the Electrostatic Precipitators, the Glass
Bag House and the Reverse Jet Bag Filters are installed at the cement
plants which has enabled them to reach almost zero levels of pollution.
As the cement industry continues to move into a phase of accelerated
growth, demand for cement will continue to outstrip supply for many
year to come.
The major landmarks in Indian Cement industry can be identified as under.
1913 First cement plant was set up in Gujarat
1936 Associated cement companies (ACC) was formed by merging 4 groups and 9 companies
1950 First attempt for bulk movement of cement was made at Okhla bulk depot by ACC. It was especially created to meet requirements of Bhakra – Nangal Dam
1951 Indian standard for Ordinary Portland Cement (IS 269) was published (now 33 grade OPC). It has since been revised in 1958, 1967, 1976 and 1989
1953 Indian Standard (IS 455) for Portland slag cement was published. It has since bee revised in 1962, 1967, 1976 and 1991
1962 Indian Standard (IS 1489) for Portland Pozzolana Cement was published. It has been revised in 1987, 1976 and 1991
1965 Cement Corporation of India was formed in Public sector and first CCI plant was set up at Kurkunta
1966 Cement Research Institute was set up at Ballabgarh (Haryana) and in 1985 it was named as National Council of Cement and Building Materials
1976 Indian Standard (IS 8112) was published for 43 grade cement and subsequently revised in 1989
July 1976 Vertical shaft kiln technology for mini cement plants was introduced
Sept’1977Government guaranteed 12% post-tax return on the net worth on new investments in cement thus accelerating the growth of cement industry.
1979 First one million ton capacity cement plant was set up by Corromendal Fertilizers at Chilampur near Cuddapah. Now it is controlled by India Cements.
Feb’1982 Introduction of Partial decontrol – portion of cement
production in each plant was subjected to Govt’s control on process and distribution and rest to be sold in open market. Licensing of new capacities continued to be under govts. control.
1983-1989
Unprecedented growth of Indian cement industry from (29.35 million tons to 61.55 million tons) due to entry of new industrial houses in cement business like L&T, Modis, JP, AV Birla Group (though Birlas are one of the earliest group in cement business), Ambuja, TATA steel etc.
1986 HDPE / PP bags were introduced to replace Jute bags
1985 Introduction of sleeper cement code by Indian Railways under ‘IRST – 40’
1987 Increase in strength of cement lead to 53 grade code (IS 12269) by BIS. It has not been revised since then.
1987 The installed capacity of Mini cement plants was raised from 200 tons per day to 600 tons per day. However for capacity beyond 300 tons per day, Mini cement plant has to use rotary kiln. The capacity of Mini plants further been raised to 900 tons per day in 1998.
March 1989
Announcement of total decontrol – Freeing of 100% of production from production and price control, end of freight equalization scheme
July 1991 Licensing system for setting up of cement plants abolished
1992 Bulk cement corporation (India) was formed
1995 First sea based bulk terminal was set up in New – Mumbai by Ambuja
1998 25 kg packaging was permitted by BIS
2000 a) IRST – 40 sleeper cement was brought under BIS perview and called ’53-S’ grade cement b) The limits of fly ash addition in PPC were revised by BIS from 10% - 25% to 15 to 35% and slag from 25% - 65% to 25% - 70 %
CEMENT INDUSTRY - PERFORMANCE &
PROSPECTS
The cement Industry in India has come a long way since 1914 when
the first successful cement plant was commissioned with the
production level of 1000 tonnes per annum. Since the partial de-
control of cement in 1982 followed by total de-control in 1989, the
cement industry has witnessed spectacular progress mainly due to the
forces of economic liberalisation and the jettisoning of price controls
and capacity restrictions. Today, India is the fourth largest producer of
cement in the world with 106 large plants belonging to 54 companies
having an installed capacity of 105 mil. tonnes. The industry which has
undertaken comprehensive modernisation and is equipped with state-
of-the -art technology, employs a work force of 1.3 lakhs and also
contributes in a very substantial manner by way of excise duty (Rs.
2500 crores) to the national exchequer. The industry is geared to reach
a production level of 100 mil. tones by 2010 A.D.
QUALITY
The wet process of the 70s has been replaced by the modern dry
process and today this accounts for around 85% of the total capacity of
the Industry. New technologies such as on line X-Ray analyser
preblending of coal, vertical roller mills for raw material grinding and
cement grinding, high efficiency separators, 5 to 6 stage pre-heaters,
and total computerised control of operations have led to increased
productivity and consistent quality.
TRANSPORT AND OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINTS
The Cement Industry has always looked to the Railways to transport a
major portion of their coal requirement and cement production.
However, owing to acute shortage of wagons there has been a
continuous decline in the transport of cement by rail and today it is as
low as 50%. This would mean that the balance 50% has to be moved
by road involving long leads. It is also expensive. The “Own Your
Wagon” Scheme introduced by the railways has not been successful
since the return on investment is not commensurate with the industry
expectations.
COAL
As against the industry’s coal requirement of 15 to 16 mil, tonnes per
annum, the availability is of the order of 10 mil. tonnes only. While
overall coal production is increasing, the surplus of coal is being taken
up by the power sector. A against an increase in production of 70 mil.
tonnes of coal during the last six years the supply to the cement sector
has not increased and has remained static at 10ml. tonnes. The quality
of coal also laves much to be desired, forcing cement companies to
resort to open market purchase and import of coal.
The answer to this problem lies in the privatisation of mining and setting up of washerie
on a “Build, Operate, Own” basis. In this connection the Central Mine Planning Design
Institute has identified 5 locations - Sasti, Deepika, Urimari, Vina and Bhyvaneswari for
setting up local washeries exclusively for the Cement Industry. These washeries are
expected to provide about 9.4 mil tonnes of coal per annum. The growth of Indian
Cement industry over the years is given below:
At the end of
Year
Installed
Capacity
(Million tons)
Production
1950 – 51 3.28 2.20
1955 – 56 5.02 4.60
1960 – 61 9.30 7.97
1965 – 66 12.00 10.97
1973 – 74 19.76 14.66
1978 – 79 22.58 19.42
1981 – 82 29.35 21.06
1984 – 85 42.00 30.13
1987 – 88 57.47 39.37
1989 – 90 61.55 45.41
1992 – 93 70.19 54.08
1996 - 97 105.25 76.22
1999 – 2000 119.10 100.45
2000 – 2001 130.40 97.61
2001 – 2002 136.50 104.50
POWR
As the manufacture of cement is a continuous process, the quality of
power affects production and hence cement companies have had to
invest in captive generating sets to meet a part of their power needs.
Over 15% of cement is produced with the help of captive plants.
CEMENT PACKING
Today, cement is mostly packed in High Density Poly Ethylene (HDPE)
and a small percentage in paper bags.
The Jute Packaging Act, 1987, requires the Cement Industry to pack
50% of its output in Jute bags.
The Cement Manufacturers’ Association (CMA) has represented to the
standing advisory Committee that jute is technically unsuitable for
packing cement on account of its hygroscopic nature and a 4-5%
seepage factor which would result in a loss to the country running into
a thousand crores every year. It would also entail a total cost increase
of Rs. 12/- per bag which will have to be borne by the consumer.
R & D
The cement Industry was one of the first to set up a research
organisation in the late 60s, for the benefit of every cement company
in the country. This research organisation now called the National
Council for Cement and Building Materials (NCBM) is funded through
the levy of chess on the Industry which ensures that the Organisation
caries out research of significant size and scale . The NCBM also
organises International Seminars and holds conferences.
In order to maintain the present trend of growth in the Cement
Industry, the research and development agenda should concentrate on
the following thrust areas.
1) Enlargement of raw material and fuel waste
2) Energy conservation
3) Promotion of Plant and Machinery design and home-grown
technologies
4) Newer applications of cement.
In keeping with the spirit of liberalisation and globalisation of the
Indian economy, the Indian Cement Industry which has attained
international stature now needs an extended horizon for its
ever0growing capacity and capacity. In order to integrate successful
with the world economy, the Industry has to develop an international
mindset and a global vision.
PERFORMANCE OF INDIAN CEMENT INDUSTRY
The Indian cement industry is the only industry in the infrastructure
segment that has shown good growth, clocking nearly 10-per cent
growth in the financial year 2001-02.
In the same period, the other core sectors have shown marginal or
negative growth. This is the first time in the history of the Indian
cement industry that annual production of large plants has crossed the
100-million mark.
During 2001-02, large plants have produced 102.40 million tonnes
(mt), an increase of 9.39 per cent over the previous year (93.61 mt to
102.40 mt). Also, cement production in March 2002 crossed the 10mt
mark — the highest ever in a month.
Cement despatches during 2001-02 have increased by 9.62 per cent
(93.44 mt to 102.43 mt) as compared to the corresponding period last
year. Cement consumption grew by 9.7 per cent (90.29 mt to 99.05
mt) in 2001-02 — a significant turnaround from 2000-01 where it
showed a negative growth of nearly 2 per cent.
A research paper brought out by Export-Import Bank of India (Exim
Bank) has analysed the competitiveness of the Indian cement industry
in major markets, and found that Indian cement is competitive in
markets like Bangladesh and Kuwait, but not in other major import
markets like Singapore, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and Philippines.
According to the study, technological advancement would reduce the
cost of production, improve quality and make Indian cement price
competitive in international markets. This should happen in both
stages viz., mining of raw material as well as kiln stage, the study
observed. The study outlined that Government also plays a major role
in helping the industry to reduce the production cost, by way of
reduction in royalty and cess on limestone and coal, meant for export
production.
If the existing capacity is utilised fully from the present utilisation level
of 80 percent, then exports can be aggressively priced on marginal
cost basis. The study observed that Thailand exports cement to USA at
a price of US $ 12-15 per tonne and even with a high transport cost of
US $ 30 per tonne, the export is profitable as price in USA is about US
$ 70 per tonne.
Government of India may also create enabling conditions for market
penetration, by way of rationalising tariff differentials and negotiating
for zero tariff dispensation of cement and clinker exports, especially
with neighbouring countries like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
Analysing the global market potentials, the study reveals that China
and Hong Kong tops the list with 567 million tonnes (34 percent of
world consumption) of cement usage. In terms of per capita
consumption, however, countries like UAE, Kuwait, Taiwan and Saudi
Arabia top the list, due to increasing construction activity. The study
found that Singapore, Bangladesh, Kuwait, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and
Philippines offer lot of potentials for export of Indian cement, provided
the production cost is brought down substantially.
Highlights:
The cement industry has seen a tremendous growth in it’s capacity
as compared to it’s demand. The prices prevailing in last two years
were lower than even the minimum required for a Greenfield plant
to break-even. This has been proved by the spate of acquisitions
and takeovers in the last year.
Indian cement industry with an installed capacity of 100 MTPA
(Million Tonnes Per Annum) is the fourth largest in the world after
China, U.S and Japan.
Industry Structure
Cement in India derives it’s demand as being the most preferred
building material. It is used extensively for household and
industrial construction.
The real driver of cement demand is creation of infrastructure,
hence cement demand in emerging economies is much higher
than developed countries as the infrastructural development in
these countries is higher than that of the developed countries.
India being one such economy has the potential for a high
demand in this sector.
The industry is highly competitive in nature comprising 59
companies operating 117 plants
Rural areas consume less than 25% of the total cement.
Availability of cheaper building materials non-permanent
structures affects the rural demand.
Per capita cement consumption in India is about 84 kg compared
to the global average of around 250 kg.
Demand Scenario
Demand for cement is price inelastic due to lack of substitutes, also
they form a very low part of the total cost. Small imbalances in
demand-supply result in a disproportionate change in cement prices.
As cement is a low value commodity, freight costs assume a
significant proportion of the final cost. This once again highlights
the regional nature of the cement industry.
In FY99, the industry witnessed a 6.3% growth in production and
7.5% in consumption.
Supply Capacity
With a production of 83mn tonnes in the year 1999-00, India is
the fourth largest producer after China (492 mn tonnes), Japan
(95 mn tonnes) and USA (84 mn tonnes).
The installed capacity of cement in India in FY98 was 100.3
MTPA, having increased by 4.3 MTPA from FY97.
The Indian cement industry is facing a glut because of
oversupply. Capacity addition in the last 5 years has been 34
MTPA. The installed capacity, which was 62 MTPA in 1993 has
increased to 100 MTPA in 1998.
The all India average capacity utilisation of cement plants is at
82%. The fall in utilisation levels (from 85% in FY95 on a capacity
of 71MTPA) has been on account of severe shortage of key
inputs/support requirements such as power, coal and rail
wagons.
EXPORT PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE OF CEMENT INDUSTRY
(CAPACITY)
Large Plants
(Large Plants means capacity more than 0.198 Mn.T. per annum)
Companies (Members) (Nos.) 54
Cement Plants (Nos.) 124
Installed Capacity (Mn. t.) 135.03
Cement Production (Mn. t.) 2001-02 102.40
Plants with Capacity of Million tonnes and above (Nos.)
64
Manpower Employed (Nos.) Approx. 1,35,000
Turnover in 2001-02 (Mn. US$) around 6,000
Mini Plants
(Mini Plants means capacity less than 0.198 Mn.T. per annum)
Cement Plants (Nos.) 300
Installed Capacity (Mn. t.) 11.10
Cement Production (Mn. t.) 6.00(P)
PERFORMANCE OF MAJOR PLAYERS
Production and consumption
During FY 2002, domestic cement consumption increased by 9.7 %, as
against a decline of about 2% in the previous fiscal. The demand
growth was driven by the construction activity in the road sector.
Housing demand and post-earthquake reconstruction activities in
Gujarat. Production and dispatches also witnessed an upward trend.
Production during the year was higher at 9.4% as compared to a
decline in the previous year. Demand growth was highest in the
eastern region (about 14%) followed by north (10%), South (9%) and
West (6%). States witnessing double digit demand growth included HP,
Delhi, Punjab, and UP. States reporting either stagnant consumption or
decline in consumption included MP (including Chattisgarh), Assam,
Meghalaya, TN, Kerala and Maharashtra. Cement and Clinker exports
were almost at the same level as in the previous year.
Sales Growth
Most of the leading players in the industry reported a growth in sales
as shown in the following table.
Growth in Sales volume
Group FY2002 FY2001
Acc Group 17.30% 0.70%
Gujarat Ambuja Group 14.90% 20.80%
Jai prakash Group 10.50% -0.20%
OCL Group 9.40% 8.40%
M.P.Birla Group 8.40% 0.10%
L & T Group 7.10% 0.80%
Aditya Birla Group 2.90% 6.80%
Dalmia Group 2.60% -1.80%
B K Birla Group 2.20% 1.90%
India Cement Group -8.80% -5.80%
All India 9.70% -0.50%
Price Realisation
Cement process had started weakening towards the second half of
RY2002 across regions. This was largely on account of weakening of
the demand supply position. However, the average retail prices during
Fy2002 were marginally higher than FY2001 across almost all the
regions except for eastern region.
Average cement prices (Rs./50 kg bag)
Averag
e
Delhi Kolkatta Mumbai Hyderaba
d
Bangalore Chennai
Q4-FY02 130 137 170 150 171 180
Q4-FY01 148 163 184 156 174 186
Change -18 -26 -14 -6 -3 -6
Q3-Fy01 141 133 168 153 165 175
Q3-FY01 142 147 156 156 175 187
Change -1 -14 12 -3 -10 -12
FY02 140 144 175 168 152 174
FY01 139 150 161 160 136 172
Change 1 -6 14 8 16 2
PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
During FY2002, although price realizations were under pressure during
the later part of the year, higher volume sales and focus on improving
operating efficiency, has resulted in most cement companies showing
improved performance. While the results are still pouring in, a brief
overview of performance of some of the prominent players are
presented
Jaypee Cement limited
Jaypee cement Ltd. (JCL) is a new company, which was formed on April
1 2002 by hiving off the cement division1 of Jaiprakash Industries Ltd.
(JIL) and merging it with Jaypee Rewa Cement Ltd. (JRCL2) a subsidiary
of JIL. JCL was formed with the objective to consolidate the cement
business of the Jaiprakash Group under one roof. JCL has three cement
Plants with a combined capacity of 4.2 million tonnes located in the
Rewa district of MP. This is infact the single largest cement complex in
India. During FY2002, Cement production and sales by Jaypee Cement
was 4.23 million tonnes and 4.22 million tonnes respectively. Clinker
production and sales was 3.98mn. tonnes and 0.45mn. tonnes
respectively. The capacity utillisation during FY2002 was maintained at
over 100% at its cement units.
Year ending 31/3/1999 (12
months audited)
Year ending 30/9/2000 (18
months audited)
Year ending 31/3/2002 Provisional
Net sales 2594.5 4868.2 11768.9
Operating profit 298.3 420.3 1701.5
Other income 13.7 50.8 131.3
Interest 571.1 690.8 736.2
Depreciation -@ -@ 662.7
Profit (Loss) for the year
-259.1 -219.7 633.9
Depreciation for earlier years
- - 590.8
Profit (Loss) after Depreciation for earlier years
-259.1 -219.7 43.1
All figures in Rs. million
# the figures of year ending 31/3/2002 is not comparable to the
previous year as the figures for this year are of JCL (18 months of JRCL
and 12 months of Cement division of JIL), whereas the figures for the
earlier years are of JRCL only.
@ Depreciation amounting to Rs. 590.8mn. pertaining to JRCL during
the period has not be provided for . this has subsequently been
provided for the year ending March 31st 2002.
The enhanced benefits of consolidating the cement division are visible
in the results. While, JRCL was making operating profits, high interest
costs had resulted tin the company making losses at the net level. The
year ending 31/3/2002 shows the JCL has made profits both at the
operational level as well as after making provision for the fixed
expenses. Apart from improvements in the fundamentals of the
cement industry, focus on operational cost control and synergetic
benefits accruing on account of consolidating the cement business has
resulted in the strong performance of the company. The future may
also see further growth in sales volume and benefits of economies of
scale as the company is planning to upgrade its capacity.
Grasim Industries Limited
FY2002 Fy2001 Growth
Sales 43866 44715 -1.9%
PBIDT 9368 9115 2.8%
Interest 1903 2388 -20.3%
Depreciation 2517 2519 -0.1%
Current Tax 565 500 13.0%
Profit before deferred tax
4383 3708 18.2%
Deferred Tax 515
Profit after deferred tax
3868 3708 4.3%
Grasim witnessed a 1.9% decline in sales during FY2002 largely on
account of reduction in sales volume and realisations of Viscose Staple
Fibre. Sponge lron and Caustic soda. However, the cement division
performed well reporting a 6% growth in sales volume and 4% growth
in sales realisation. While the operating profit witnessed a modest
growth of 2.8% reduction of over 20% in interest cost resulted in the
profit before deferred tax witnessing a growth of 18.2%.
In the cement division, production at 9.53 million Tonnes and sales
volumes at 9.68 million tonnes were up by 5% and 6% respectively,
over the previous year. Capacity utillisation in the cement plants
during the year stood at 92%. During the year, the company has
commissioned 4 ready mix concrete plants of an aggregate capacity of
1 million cubic meters. At Hyderabad, Chennai, Noida and Bangalore. A
one million tonne cement-grinding unit at Bhatinda has been set up as
well. This has enabled the company to consolidate its position in the
lucrative northern sectors of the country. In addition. The company is
implementing various plans at a capex of Rs. 3440 million, as
indicated:
- Two poser plants of 23 MW and 12.5 MW at Aditya Cement
(Rajasthan) and Grasim Cement (Tamilnadu) respectively which are
expected to be operational by December 2002.
- Ongoing modernization of plants and capacity expansion through
de-bottlenecking – has resulted in capacity enhancement of 0.5 Mn.
MT so far. A further capacity addition of 1.8Mn. is expected by end
FY 2003. On implementation of these projects, Grasim’s cement
manufacturing capacity will go up to 13.2 Mn. Mt.
ACC
During FY2002, although sales realisation was under pressure. ACC reported a
9.1% growth in net sales due to over 15% growth in sales volume nevertheless,
enhanced focus on high growth markets in the northern and the eastern regions
of the country has resulted in relatively higher realisations for the company. The
operating profit of the company was higher by 24.9% indicating higher level of
operating efficiency (control on raw material and power & fuel costs) and
synergetic benefits on account of the strategic alliance with Gujarat Ambuja.
Interest costs of the company was also lower by 13.8% due to prepayment of
high cost debt and better working capital management. thus, higher volume
sales, control on operating costs, and lower interest cost resulted in a 128.1%
growth in profit after tax. During FY2002, the kiln at Wadi 9karnataka) was
commissioned.
FY02 FY01 Change
Net sales 28,106 25,764 9.1%
Other income 825 727 13.5%
Expenditure 23,950 22,435 6.8%
Operating profit 4,157 3,329 24.9%
Interest 1,467 1,702 -13.8%
Depreciation 1,511 1,413 7.0%
Profit before tax -360 -333
Extraordinary items
339
Tax 37
Profit after tax (Loss)
1,304 572 128.1%
Gujarat Ambuja Cements
FY 2002
(9 months)
FY 2001
(9 months)
Growth
Net Sales 11696.2 10177.2 14.9%
Other Income 185.5 105.7 75.5%
Total Exp. 8325.4 7037.3 18.3%
Op. Profit 3370.8 3139.9 7.4%
Interest 726.3 1032 -29.6%
Depreciation 1009.8 983.1 2.7%
Current Tax 127.5 120 6.3%
Def. Tax 167.5
Profit after tax 1525.2 1110.5 37.3%
All figures in Rs. Million
During the first 9 months of FY2002, Gujarat Ambuja has shown a
14.9% growth in sales. Although, sales volume was higher by over 20%
at 5.3 mn. Tonnes, pressures on sales realisation resulted in lower
growth in sales in value terms. The cement plant of the company at
Chandrapur (Maharashtra) has been completed and is currently under
trial production. As a result, the raw material expenses of the company
has increased by 89%. Inspite of this, the company was able to show a
7.4% growth in operating profit due to focus on cost reduction and
enhancing operating efficiency. Growth in operating profit coupled with
sharp reduction in interest costs resulted in a 37.3% growth in net
profit, even though the tax provision was higher.
Birla Corporation Limited
FY2002 FY2001 Growth
Sales 11239.1 10212.9 10.0%
Other Income 207.2 196.8 5.3%
Total Exp. 10739.8 9753 10.1%
Op. Profit 499.3 459.9 8.6%
Interest 362.1 437.1 -17.2%
Depreciation 351.6 350.7 0.3%
Profit before deferred tax
-7.2 -131.1 NA
Deferred tax 0.2
Wealth tax 0.2 0.2 0%
Refund of tax relating to earlier years
4.2
Profit after tax -7.6 -127.1 NA
All figures in Rs. Million
During FY2002, Birla Corporation witnessed a 10% topline growth
helped by higher sales volume and higher realisations in its markets.
Control on operating costs resulted in the operating margins being
maintained at 4.4%. This resulted in the operating profits improving by
8.6%. This coupled with reduction in interest costs by 17.2% resulted
in the net loss reducing from Rs.127.1 mn. In FY2001 to Rs.7.6 mn. In
FY 2002. During FY2002, Cement continued to be the dominating
business of Birla Corporation – accounting for 84% of turnover and 78%
of total capital employed. Further, Cement was the only profit making
division of the company during FY2002.
Profit before Interest and Tax (FY2002)
Cement 533.6
Jute -40.7
Others -65
Total 427.9
All figures in Rs. Million
Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited
FY2002 FY2001 Growth
Sales 4171.9 4117.8 1.3%
Other income 116.2 155.7 -25.4%
Total exp. 3434.2 3389.8 1.3%
Op. Profit 737.7 728 1.3%
Interest 298.1 324.8 -8.2%
Depreciation 202.2 197.7 2.3%
Profit before
deferred tax
286.1 288 -0.7%
Deferred tax 31.5
Profit after tax 254.6 288 -11.6%
All figures in Rs. Million
Despite over 2.5% growth in sales volume, sales in value terms
witnessed a nominal growth of 1.3% due to pressure on sales
realisation. Control on operating costs however resulted in a similar
growth in operating profit. Interest cost were lower by 8% during
FY2002. While profit before deferred tax was marginally lower than
that in FY2001, provision of Rs.31.5 mn. For deferred tax resulted in
the net profit witnessing a decline of 11.6%. During FY2002, Cement
continued to be the dominating business of Dalmia Cements –
accounting for 62% of turnover, 75% of profit before interest and tax,
and 51% of total capital employed.
Larsen & Toubro Limited
FY2002 FY2001 Growth
Cement Sales volume (mn. Tonnes)
Domestic
Exports9.53
2.40
8.95
2.36
6.5%
1.7%
Total 11.93 11.31 5.5%
Cement sales value (Rs. Bn.) 24.59 22.77 8.0%
Ex-Factory realisation (Rs./ tonne)
1303 1251 4.2%
PBDIT/ sales for cement div. 18.5% 16.9%
PBIDT/ sales (inc. fiscal benefits) for cement div.
19.8% 19.0%
All figures in Rs. Million
L&T reported strong performance by its cement division during
FY2002. The topline growth (8.0%) was on account of growth in both
sales realisation (4.2%) and sales volume (5.5%). Focus on cost control
and improvement in operational efficiency resulted in the operating
margin improving from 16.9% in FY2001 to 18.5%. Some key steps
initiated by the company in this direction included.
Reduction in heat consumption by 7 Kcal/ tonne of cement
Reduction in power consumption by 3 units/ tonne of cement
Switchover from imported coal to domestic coal. Further, purchases
were made from smaller coal miners to reduce purchasing cost.
Reduction of packaging costs by optimising specifications and
usage of laminated bags in place of pure paper bags.
Reduction in fixed costs by Rs.320 million in FY02.
Reduction in the number of stocking points and increase direct
despatches so as to reduce secondary freight, handling costs,
backtracking and operating costs of dumps.
Installation of Optimisation software to manage the network to
minimise total delivered cost.
Madras Cements Limited
FY2002 FY2001 Growth
Net Sales 7063.0 6183.3 14.2%
Other income 30.7 24.9 23.3%
Expenditure 5290.5 4426.4 19.5%
Operating profit
1772.5 1756.9 0.9%
Interest 775.0 654.1 18.5%
Depreciation 609.6 527.3 15.6%
Tax 150.0 116.4 29.3%
Net profit 268.6 484.0 -44.5%
Madras Cements Ltd. has reported 14.2% growth in net sales during
FY2002. Although, sales volume increased by over 20% to 3.26 mn.
Tonnes, pressures on sales realisation resulted in lower growth in sales
in value terms. Rise in operating costs by 19.5% resulted in a marginal
0.9% growth in operating expenses. All elements of the operating cost
witnessed an increase, with the largest rise experienced in Freight
costs (42%) followed by raw material costs (28.5%). Interest and
Depreciation charges were also higher by 18.5% and 15.6%
respectively on account of capacity expansion at the Alathiyur *TN)
unit. As a result the net profit declined by 44.5% to Rs. 269 mn.
Operating Cost
FY2002 FY2001 Growth
Raw material 1029.8 800.6 28.6%
Employee cost 358.9 328.3 9.3%
Power & Fuel 1645.9 1434.8 14.7%
Freight 994.4 700.2 42.0%
Others 1261.7 1162.5 8.5%
Total 5290.5 4426.4 19.5%
All figures in Rs. Million
PEST ANALYSIS
POLITICAL:
Rigid government policies in respect of price and distribution control. With a view
to give impetus to the growth of cement industry, government took the following
major decisions:
Percentage post-tax return on net worth (announced by government in
1977)
Partial decontrol w.e.f. 28th February 1982.
Complete decontrol w.e.f. 1st March 1989.
Delicensing of cement industry in July 1991.
Earlier In order to contain prices in shortage scenario, government continued
controls and thus cement shortage continued as there was hardly any generation
of reserves for the cement producers which could be invested in major expansion
and modernization.
ECONOMIC:
Cement production after liberalization grew at a compounded annual growth
rate (CAGR) of 8.4 percent. The demand for cement also grew at CAGR of
8.4%.
Cement production grew by negligible 0.2% in 1992-93, by 6.7% in 1993-94,
7.9% in 94-95, 10.5% in 95-96 – in consonance with the economic growth of
the country.
The recession in 1996-97 saw a drop in the growth rate for production to
8.5%.
Cement industry is dominated by the private sector. It not only holds the bulk
of the capacities (87%) but also produces 95% of the total production.
The capacity utilization of private sector is higher at around 86% as
compared to 40% in the public sector.
The multiplier effect of the cement consumption to GDP growth in India is
around 1.5 times and with current liberalization and opening of the economy,
the multiplier is set to grow to 1.7 times.
The multiplier effect on the basis of input stands at 0.95 times and is likely to
improve in the future as economic activity picks up.
Another driving force is expected to be on account of increased government
spending on infrastructure projects like roads, dams, and power projects.
Trend of takeovers instead of greenfield project in the present scenario.
SOCIAL:
Cement is a core sector and its development is of vital importance to not only
the national growth but also the growth of the society as a whole.
India being among the most populous countries and with the present growth
rate, an estimated 1 billion people will live in India by the year 2020. This will
put an enormous strain on the existing and future roads, rail network, power
sector, port facilities and on housing construction which will have to increase
dramatically if it is to meet the needs of the people.
Added to this will be the necessity to build improved sanitation, and sewage
disposal systems and to invest in water treatment works in order to provide an
adequate and clean water supply.
The above mentioned requirements in the infrastructure and other basic
facilities clearly indicate the growth prospects or requirements of cement
in the near future.
Due to increased concern towards the environmental pollution, the companies
are now using advanced technologies for pollution control. It is also a
mandatory clearance for setting up a new cement plant.
TECHNOLOGICAL:
The modernization process of cement industry included the following aspects:
Precalcination technology.
Computer controlled kiln operation
Centralized operation
Analog and digital display of process parameters
Electronic packing and
Conversion of old wet process plants into dry/semi-dry plants.
The trends, which are yet to be adopted in Indian Cement industry, are use of
Bulk cement distribution and use of Ready Mix Concrete.
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS using Porter's Diamond Framework:
Porter argues that there are inherent reasons why some industries are more
competitive than others in a framework called as Porter's Diamond model.
1. Factor Conditions: Specific factor conditions provide initial advantages
which are subsequently built upon to yield more advanced factors of
competition. Basic conditions that are advantageous to cement industry are
its immense potential for growth. The country is in a developing stage and is
presently poor in infrastructure facilities. The growth of the country's economy
depends a lot on the development of infrastructure facilities and hence a huge
potential for cement industry.
2. Home Demand Conditions: provides the basis upon which the
characteristics of the advantage of an industry are shaped. Demand patterns
and trends can be used to see how important cement would be in the years to
come.
Future Growth Needs:
National highway systems alone needs to be more than doubled, an
increase of 34,300 kms.
Ports will be required to improve the capacity to approximately 277 million
tonnes in order to cope with the increased coastal bulk freight.
Housing construction will need to produce an added 64.4 million new
homes by 2001.
The country needs to spend 10.75 billion dollars a year on new capacity.
Railway networking, state highways and sewage treatment works, airport
and other facilities needed to support an increasingly populated nation.
3. Related and supporting industries: The major impact on the cement
industry is from the construction industry which, right now is in the recession
in the overall economic growth. But once we are out of this recession, the
construction industry is bound to grow (as can be seen from the above
mentioned future needs) and thus cement industry will have a high time once
again.
4. Industry Strategies, structure and Rivalry: The prominent strategy visible
in the industry now-a-days is of going for mergers and acquisitions, which is
giving promising returns to the shareholder's value. The predators, mostly the
larger cement companies are in the expansionist mode. The industry today is
fragmented with about 115 plants spread across 50 business groups and the
prediction is that at least 20 business groups will move out of the industry- the
big contributor to this being recession.
Acquisition gives a company an advantage in terms of selecting an
appropriate location since the assessment of the market, limestone quality
and competition is available on hand and the risk of setting up a new plant is
reduced. An example for this is, when ACC acquired Damodar Cement, two
years ago, it had the first hand knowledge of the market potential and other
advantages.
Also the industry being raw material intensive, availability of limestone also
becomes a crucial factor.
Talking about the industry structure, the major competitors in the industry
are:
Birla Group
ACC
JK Group
L & T
Gujarat Ambuja
India Cements
Comprising about 65.6% of the industry's capacity.
In terms of rivalry, some sort of rivalry is existing in the industry owing to these
acquisitions. One such recent example is of India Cement and Raasi Cement.
India Cement's open offer to acquire 20% stake in Raasi Cement at a price of Rs
300 surprised the market. In return India Cements will get Raasi Cements which
has a capacity of 1.6 million tonnes , which is being expanded to 2.5 million
tonnes. By this, India Cements will be getting some of the most efficient
manufacturing plants at far below its replacement costs.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
AND CONSUMER INTEREST
Ready Mixed Concrete and Bulk Cement
There is a need to encourage use of ready-mixed concrete bulk
movement of cement for quality and speedy construction at a
considerably reduced cost.
Hitherto, a large portion of cement production is utilised for urban
development activities and large construction projects. There is yet a
vast untapped market potential in the rural areas.
Consumer Interests
Presently, the cement producers are required to pack 50% of the total
cement production in jute bags. This is against the interest of the
consumer because jute bags are permeable in nature. Since, cement is
a hygroscopic product and has limited shelf-life, it needs to be
protected by superior packaging material viz Paper /HDPE /
Polypropylene, etc.
Consumer is becoming increasingly quality conscious and exercises his
choice regarding the particular brand of product and packaging . In a
situation where there are several manufacturers, it is necessary to
provide suitable identifications of colour and design for quality,
production and packaging. The would discourage adulteration of
cement, which is undesirable.
In the interest of consumer protection, the cement industry needs to
pack cement in superior HDPE/Paper bags of their own choice of colour
and design for easy identification by the consumer.
Suggestions and Recommendations
The following recommendations are need to be considered so as to
increase cement consumption.
Ready-Mixed Concrete (RMC) is produced under strict controlled
supervision and provides to the consumer a consistent quality product,
which improves the quality of construction RMC should be encouraged
by exempting it from Central Excise Duty and permitting tax holiday.
etc.
RMC should be specified all Government Tenders for their
projects.
Excise duty and sales tax on cement used for large construction
projects like concrete roads, canal linings, etc. should be exempted.
To encourage more bulk transportation of cement.
An excise duty differential of Rs. 50 should be introduced on bulk and
bagged cement.
MODVAT on packaging material, which is permitted by Government at
the Cement Plant, should also be extended to Bulk Cement Terminals,
if cement has been transported to the Terminals in bulk form by. Sea
or Rail and is packed at the terminals.
Most of the countries imparting cement have bulk handling facilities at
ports (on shore or even floating) and insist on importing cement in
bulk. Hence, bulk transportation and establishment of bulk terminals
would help in maximising exports. This will also help the domestic
market to grow qualityvelyin line with international standards.
To open up diversified uses for cement consumption, the construction
of concrete roads (National/State highways, Expressways, City roads),
canal linings, pre-fab elements and newer applications in rural areas
be given a thrust.
For all future construction projects, such as concrete roads, canal lining
etc. the economics of cement should be examined with alternative
materials and decision should be taken in favour of those which are
economical on life cycle cost basis.
A nodal agency be formed for the promotion of coastal transport
through establishment of terminals, bulk handling facilities, sea vessels
and other infrastructure facilities. Incentives should be offered for
attracting investment in this areas.
The Motor Transport Act restricting and reeducating the maximum axle
load to 9 tonnes should be re-examined to partly meet ever increasing
requirement of movement of cement and other goods.
Jute Packaging materials (Compulsory Use of Packaging Commodities)
Act 1987 needs to be modified in the light of the consumer interest, in
favour of alternative packaging materials which are superior in quality
and provide greater protection to cement, which is hygroscopic
product and hence has animated shelf-life.
In the interest of the consumer, cement producers should be allowed
to use superior packaging material of their own choice of colour and
design for easy identification, as per the quality requirement of the
customer, complying with BIS standards.
Cement Regulate Account Funds, lying idle with Government , may be
utilised for the benefit of the cement consumer in the promotional
activities concerning bulk transportation, redid-mixed concrete, rural
applications, training activities, creating consumer awareness, etc.
FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS FOR ACC
In the present day competitive scenario, the notion of strategy is more of a
search for opportunity to identify basis of advantage. There is a need to identify if
there are factors in the environment, which influence the capability of an
organization to position itself to such advantage.
Now, we will analyze the Associated Cement Companies (ACC) in Porter’s five
forces framework.
a) Threat of entrants
The threat of entry in cement industry depends on a variety of factors and the
extent to which they are a barrier to the entry of new companies.
(a) Economies of scale: Economies of scale in cement industry are very
important in the present scenario where only a few companies are able to
sustain which have a prominent presence. Until and unless you want to focus
on a very small, specific segment in the market, economies of scale are
important.
ACC, a cement major, operating mainly in North India has plants at
various locations in various states like Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Madhya
Pradesh, West Bengal, etc. At present, it has 13.1% share of the
industry's total production. Also ACC has a diverse range of business
activities as it manufactures and markets cement refractories and
refractory products and also provides consultancy and engineering
services.
(b) Capital requirements of entry : The capital cost of entry varies according to
technology and scale. The cost of setting up a new 1 million tonnes per
annum is of the order of Rs.400 crores. Also the technology requirements in
terms of the latest instrumentation systems so as to design the plant for zero
downtime, high product quality, and better throughput with minimum energy
consumed per unit of cement production.
(c) Access to distribution channels : Access to a wide and deep distribution
channel is important for any company to have a big share in the cement
market. The segments of cement markets are in diverse distributed areas so
a good distribution network is a must for any company to sustain in the
present scenario.
ACC has a deep distribution network in the state of Maharashtra,
Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Bihar
and Andhra Pradesh, so has an access to diverse market opportunities.
(d) Cost advantages independent of size : It is difficult for a competitor to break
into a market if there is an established operator which knows the market well,
has good relationships with key players and suppliers and knows how to
overcome the market and operating problems.
ACC is in the cement industry since 1936 and has got diverse experiences
of growth and recession in the industry. It has a good distribution setup
and has good relationships with the suppliers and buyers especially with
the government, who is a major supplier and a major buyer since the ages
of regulation.
(e) Legislation or Government control : Earlier the industry was totally regulated
and licensed but now it has been de-licensed and decontrolled, so now it is
not a major deterrent to any new company to enter the cement industry.
(f) Differentiation : By differentiation, we mean the provision of a product or
service regarded by the user as different from and of high value than the
competitors. The organizations that are able to achieve strategies of
differentiation provide for themselves, a real barrier to competitive entry. ACC
is using the latest technology to provide the best of the product to its
competitors. ACC is the first company in India going for bulk transport at its
ACC Kalamboli plant.
All organizations have to maintain resources and provide goods or services, what
is known as the supply chain or the value chain of the organization. The
relationships of the buyers and suppliers can have an impact on constraining the
strategic freedom of an organization and in influencing the margins of that
organization.
2. Power of buyers
Cement industry is prominently a buyers market owing to the presence of a
large number of cement brands available in the market in case of the ordinary
Portland cement, which is the major chunk of cement production in India. Still
the companies having a strong brand name have a competitive advantage
because the customers generally go for a strong brand name rather than
price for the long run safety of their purposes.
3. Power of suppliers
Suppliers play an important role if they are less in number for a particular
commodity. The trend nowadays is of reducing the resource dependence
on the suppliers by way of backward integration. Generally, the companies
who are operating in the economies of scale go in for backward integration
by producing the required inputs themselves.
The supply requirements in the cement industry are mainly coal and power
and they also form a good chunk in cement production. The dependence on
power being reduced now a days by going in for captive power plants. ACC
too has gone in for captive power plants to reduce their dependence on
power, also owing to the erratic power supply.
Coming to the coal now the partial liberalisation in the coal sector by the
government, the dependence on government has been reduced to some
extent.
4. The threat of substitutes
The availability of substitutes can place a ceiling on the prices for a
company’s products, or make inroads into the markets and so reduce its
effectiveness.
Owing to the cost of cements, new innovative products are being built which
are much cheaper and provide more or less the same strength as that of
cement. Right now these products are not being commercially developed but
it may be a threat to the industry in the long run.
ACC has diversified itself into diverse areas and is also providing specialized
products and services like bulk transport etc. So presently, there is not much
threat to ACC from the substitute.
LEARNING ISSUES
Going for the new cement plant is not advisable in the present scenario as it
takes around 3 years to build a new green field project. In the mean time, the
environment may change, hence the risk of setting up a new plant is high as
compared to going for acquisitions.
Acquisitions give company an advantage in terms of selecting the appropriate
location since the assessment of the market, limestone quality and
competition is available on hand and the risk of setting up a plant is reduced.
Most of the cement companies are still sustaining owing to the growth in other
sectors of their operations. So the companies are not advised to focus on only
one particular product or service.
Cost effectiveness is the word of the day. The companies producing at a
lesser cost than their competitors have a strategic advantage especially in
adverse conditions.
So instead of going for expansion the companies should try to improve their
capacity utilization, so as to benefit most from its existing assets.
Focus of the company should be more on the value of their product than on
their price because a strong brand value indicates the strength, corporate
image, price, recommendations, availability, etc. itself. Since it is a buyers
market, the focus should be to build a strong brand image.
More emphasis should be laid on marketing since the cement market is a
buyers market. Almost every market has 10+ brands, as a result of which the
sales depend on the image that the company projects on the minds of the
customers.
STRATEGIES RECOMMENDED FOR ACC
In the light of the above learning issues that we have discussed, we put forward
certain strategies for ACC to face the challenges in the present scenario and how
to improve its market position in the coming years.
1. ACC should try to go for maximum cost efficiency in its Indian plants as it is
doing for all its overseas operations. This is because low cost production is a
major strategic advantage that the companies have in the level of competition
that exists today. This is so because even if the prices of cement go down
and other costs increase (which are common to all the players) ACC will be
able to cope with the dipping margins owing to this cost advantage.
2. Marketing focus : Marketing the cement today presents many challenges –
because at present the supply outstrips the demand, prices are stagnant and
the markets have failed to deliver the expected demand, thus making
marketing not only demanding but exhilarating. ACC is a strong brand name
and can do much better by extensive marketing.
3. Strategic Advantage from Bulk Cement and RMC : BCCI (Bulk Cement
corporation of India) is a wholly owned subsidiary of ACC. ACC can target
niche markets of Bulk Cement and can try to increase its awareness and
relevance wherever there are bulk requirements in the cement industry. ACC
should also try to build advantage on Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) as it is a
better option in the upcoming construction industry, the advantages of which
have been discussed before.
SWOT ANALYSIS OF INDIAN CEMENT INDUSTRY
PERSPECTIVE PLANNING: CAPACITY, DEMAND, PRODUCTION,
INFRASTRUCTURE AND EMPLOYMENT GENERATION
SECTION -1
CAPACITY, PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION AND
DEMAND
Growth
Cement industry is a core sector industry and forms the backbone of
infrastructure development of the country. Industry has shown steady
and consistent growth in the last three plan periods. The easing of
controls which was initiated n 1982 culminating in total decontrol in
1989 and the implementation of policies of liberalisation put the
dormant cement industry on a vibrant growth path. The industry grew
3 times both in terms of capacity and production. The industry is
presently growing at the rate of 8% -10% per annum.
Cement consumption
Though the Indian cement industry with production of around 69 mil.t.
(2001-02), ranks fourth in the world, the country’s present per capita
cement consumption is low at around 82 kg. Compared to the present
would average of around 250 kg. Several developing countries like
Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Malaysia etc. have per capita cement
consumption above 150 kg. This leaves large scope for rapid and
continued growth in the next two plan periods at least.
GDP Growth and Demand
Cement consumption is related to overall economic growth (GDP) and
has been growing at around 7.5% during the last two years. With the
GDP growth accelerating to exceed 6%, the cement demand also has
shown a sharp rise to above 11% in 2001-02 – three year moving
average crossing 8%.
Demand Forecast
As per studies done on forecasting of cement demand in the IX Plan by
NCAER and IIM. Ahmedabad, with a GDP growth of around 6%, the
cement is expected to grow around @ 8 to 9% annually to reach 109
mil.t. in the final year i.e. 2001-02. The grow could be even higher with
higher growth of economic development and Government taking up
large projects – concrete roads, canal lining, mass housing etc. The
production will have to reach 113 mil. T. for taking into account 8 mil.t.
of exports comprising of 50% cement and 50% clinker, expected in
that year. The growth is likely to be sustained at the rate of 8% over
the X Plan and demand is likely to reach 160 mil. t. in the year 2006-
2007.
See table I below :
(Mil.t.)
Year Demand Ex.
Growth (%)
Production Capacity
1996-97 73 7 76.0 105
1997-98 79 83.5 112
1998-99 86 90.0 120
1999-00 93 8.3 97.5 125
2000-01 101 105.5 130
2001-02 109 113.0 135
Investments
Cement capacity has also to suitably increase to a level of 135 mil.t. to
meet such growing demand in the IX Plan. This would mean an
investment of over Rs. 30,000 crores with current prices and similar
investment will be necessary in the X Plan too. This includes the
investment that has to be made in improving infrastructure areas of
coal, rail and power to support increased production. These investment
will be mostly in private sector.
Details given below:
Rs. Crores
Cement Capacity 12,250
Washeries 500
Captive Mines 2,000
Railways 12,750
Power 3,000
Total 30,500
Growth Scenario
The industry has plans to add a capacity of 30 to 35 mil.t. during the IX
Plan. Number of proposals have been initiated already.
The trends in setting up new capacities will be to wares increasing use
of pozzolana materials like fly ash, a bye-product of power houses and
blast furnace slag from steel plants. These will help a blast furnace
slag from steel plants. These will help a better environment on one
side by making effective use of the waster materials and also reduce
the cost of cement. These are also world wide trends.
There will be more of split location plants, with grinding units (built
away from the clinkerisation unit) nearer sources of fly ash or slag etc.
Hence some of the capacities are likely to come up in the
neighborhood of thermal power houses and steel industries to take
advantage of availability of fly-ash and slag. Some of the capacities are
also likely to come up at the coasts to exploit export potential both for
its own sake and as a hedge against fall in domestic demand.
Suggestions and Recommendations
There is need to improve the per capita consumption of cement to
match with higher standard of living and higher level of economic
development. The Government has to take steps like encouraging
private sector participation in concrete road construction, canal
lining provision of housing for the housing for the masses using
modern production technologies, prefabricated concrete
components, etc.
The healthy growth of cement industry in the IX Plan Would depend
largely upon expeditious removal of bottlenecks :
- Expeditious clearances for limestone mining; “Single Window”
approach.
- Ensure Parallel growth of infrastructure support particularly in
the areas of coal, railways and power to take place concurrently
to meet the needs of the industry.
As per the normal practice long term forecast would necessarily
need review and updating at regular intervals.
SECTION – 2: INFRASTRUCTURE (A) COAL
Short Supply of Coal
Performance of the cement industry entirely depends on availability of
adequate quantity and proper quality of coal. Coal supply to the
cement industry has not kept pace with the sharp increases in cement
production. On the other hand, supplies show an alarming downward
trend.
REDUCTION IN RECEIPT OF LINKED COAL
(Mil.t.)
Year Actual fact con. In. C.P.P.
Supply Ap. Lia.
Cost -----
La. Lig. --- (FW/Day)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1998-99 12.05 10.49 1.27 0.09 0.8 941
1999-00 12.78 10.34 0.86 0.12 0.7 963
2000-01 13.29 10.28 1.62 0.71 0.8 934
2001-02 14.07 10.00 2.00 1.00 0.8 824
The availability of rail wagons for coal movement is shrinking instead
of going up :
- The supply of coal to the cement industry (large plants) against
linkage has more or less remianant at 10 mil.t.
- The total production in the country has gone up about 240 mil.t.. in
1996-97 to 282(P) mil.t. in 2001-02i.e. an increase of about 42 mil.t.
in five years. This extra production has been absorbed growing
requirements of power sector only.
- The coal shortages are being made good by using imported coal,
procurement from open market at higher cost and lignite from NLC
by the Southern Cement plants.
- Main concern of the industry is that if coal problem is not tackled
urgently industry is bound to suffer a serious setback in the coming
years.
Estimated Coal Requirement
The cement production estimates and coal requirements (large plants)
based on consumption norm of 220 kg. Per tonne of cement emerges
as under :
Year Projected Production of
Cement (Large Plant)
Coal Requirement (Mil.t.)
Kiln Captive Power
Total
1996-97 70 15.50 1.00 16.50
2001-02 105 23.00 2.50 25.50
2006-07 150 33.00 3.00 36.00
It is expected that better coal will be available by way of imports /
Washeries / improved technology.
Ash content in Coal
With the ash content in coal supplies increasing to near 40%, the
efficiency of production goes down. The only solution is setting up
Washeries at pitheads. The cement industry is already going in for two
Washeries one at Sasti through Coal India Ltd. and other at Dipika
through a foreign Build Own Operate (BOO) entrepreneur. The industry
should set up early more such coal Washeries captive to them getting
allotment of coal and land from Coal India. They should own and
operate coal mines too, to overcome the shortages of coal supplies
from Coal India Ltd.
Suggestion and Recommendations
As import of coal becomes uneconomical due to high duties,
reduction of import duties has to be considered to help and sustain
growth in the coast based ad near coast plants. This will also relieve
the pressure on supplies and rail movement to other inland plants.
The southern plants are using lignite mainly for making up for the
shortage of coal. Regular change over to this fuel will mean putting
up additional plant and machinery. Plants can consider this only if
long term commitment for regular supply of lignite can be made by
Naively lignite Corporation or other supplies. Such commitment in
not available both in South and in West where the deposits of lignite
are yet to be systematically exploited.
Exploitation of lignite deposits in Rajasthan and Gujarate should be
accelerated and this would help plant in Rajasthan and Gurjarate to
utilise this alternate fuel. About 2 mil.t. of lignite each in South and
in West need to be set apart for cement industry.
Need to promote setting up of coal Washeries at the locations
identified by CMPDI (Sasti, Dipika, Urimari, Bina and Bhubaneswari)
to meet the quantitative and qualitative requirements of he cement
industry. While Sasti is being installed by WCL, Dipika by the
cement industry under BOO Scheme on priority basis to begin with.
Captive coal mines for the cement industry need to be set up. It will
provide reliability of coal supply.
Operation of industry’s own dedicated closed circuit trains for coal
from captive mines / Washeries to cement plants.
As per the normal practice long term forecast would necessarily
need review and updating at regular intervals.
SECTION – 2: INFRASTRUCTURE (B) RAILWAYS
The industry has been facing wagons shortage for moving cement to
markets and this has become steadily worse due to wagons shortage
with the railways. During 2001-02, the share of rail movement to total
dispatches of cement dropped to 45% from 50% in 2000-01 (rest
moving by costlier road route). Considering the higher cost for longer
distances by road trucks which also consumer higher energy than rail,
it is desirable that atleast 60% of the total dispatches move by rail at
macro level. Plants in cluster and million tonne plants will need a
higher 85% movement by rail due to longer average leads for such
concentration. Wagon supplies for coal movement is equally acute and
continues to hurt cement industry’s performance due to frequent
stoppages of kiln operations for want of coal.
Fall in Supply of Wagons For Cement
The industry is anxious to take advantage of the ‘Own Your Wagon’
scheme but could not progress much due to the present unattractive
terms. The industry in also keen to run captive trains both for coal and
cement movement in closed circuit fashion with captive rakes owned
by them. Suitable framework has to be developed by the railways and
industry.
Suggestions and Recommendations
Railway should plan increased wagon procurement and allotment of
wagons for movement of cement, coal and gypsum to the cement
industry to cover at least 60% of the production at macro level and
85% of production in case of plants concentrated in clusters and
million tonne plants.
Railways should consider providing large number of containerised
wagons for increasing cement movement.
More attractive terms have to be offered for ‘Own Your Wagon’
Scheme and dialogues are needed between cement industry and
Railways to implement the scheme.
Suitable incentives to the cement for running captive trains will
have to be worked out between Railways and cement industry.
There is need to upgrade the priority for movement of gypsum to
cement plants from priority ‘D’ to ‘C’. This will enable cement plants
all over India to get an increased supply of gypsum.
Moving cement and using it in bulk without packing is the normal
practice around the world. Bulk movement of cement is being set
up between Bombay and Wadi by a joint sector company with
Central Government participation. Similar steps are needed for
other cities which are ripe for such introduction.
Mechanisation : Special Cell in Railways be formed to co-ordinate
and direct efforts in the industry for mechanising terminals and
handling operation in a planned manner. Without mechanising the
operation, wagon availability problem cannot be solved.
As per the normal practice long term forecast would necessarily
need review and updating at regular intervals.
SECTION – 2: INFRASTRUCTURE (C) POWER
1. The industry has been facing continuous and increasing power
shortages for several years in different States.
2. The industry has already installed captive generating capacity of
1100 MW (2000-01). So far these are mostly diesel generators
amounting to 30% of the total requirement meant for limited short
term stand by short-term operations with the power cuts assuming
larger dimensions of even 80-90% at times and for long durations,
industry has plans to increase it further to about 60% or more with
mostly coal based thermal plants. By end of the X Plan this may
amount to 1300 MW needing 2.0 – 2.5 mil.t. of coal. There could
also be power generations at the planned coal Washeries using the
washery rejects.
Suggestions and Recommendations
The Centre and the State grids should improve power generation
and quality of supply without frequent tripping, I drop in voltage
and frequency which can cause damage to equipment.
For setting up captive power generating capacity, the cement
industry should be given incentives similar to Independent Power
Projects (IPP) Coal for power must be moved on priority as for other
power plants.
Parallel operations of grid and co-generation of power need to be
permitted as a policy.
As per the normal practice long term forecast would necessarily
need review and updating at regular intervals.
SECTION – 3
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
AND
EMPLOYMENT GENERATION IN CEMENT INDUSTRY
The cement industry (large and mini plants) provides direct
employment today to 2.5 lakhs people. This will increase by about
24,000 by the year 2001-02. Besides it generates in additions
downstream indirect employment to about 20,000 men per mil.t. of
cement produced by the way downstream services like transport,
handling, distribution construction services. Additional employment
generated is given below :
Year Capacity Employment
Large Mine Direct (Persons in
Lakhs)
Indirect (Persons in
Lakh)
Existing 1995-96
88.23 9.0 2.25 20.0
Additional
2001-02
32.00 6.0 0.24 7.6
By the year
Indian cement industry has achieved a unique record of harmonious
industrial relations with labout – Tow Wage Board Awards in the sixties;
Two voluntary awards one in seventies and other in early eighties.
The last settlement of wage dispute in cement industry in 1992 is
unique in the sense that for the first time all the five union came
together and jointly signed a bipartite settlement before the Chief
Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi – an amicable settlement of
labour dispute across the table.
The Indian cement industry with aid of World Bank has set up four
Regional Training Centres (RTC’s) for development human resources.
They have been forwarded with ,modern teaching aids and computer
based learning modules.
Suggestions and Recommendations
The success of Japanese enterprises has been credited to their
distinctive pattern of work organisation. The social organisation of
production in Japanese plants based on team work, job rotation
continuous upgradation of skill and self management creates a
knowledge in workers and develops high trust relation. The cement
industry in India should implement similar policies.
While the training at technicians level appears to be provided for
there is been for trained managers particularly in the climate of new
technologies being introduced with automation central control
room, new techniques of quality management etc. A national forum
needs to be set up for the industry for periodical exchange of
experience an views on management of people in the light of new
technologies.
MODERISATION, TECHNOLOGY UPGRADATON,
POLLUTION CONTROL AND ENERGY
CONSERVATION
Mining
The use of modern techniques like photogrammetry and remote
sensing have become hand to discover virgin deposits especially in the
hilly and inaccessible regions. These are to be adopted for optimum
utilisation of reserves and steps should also be taken to encourage use
of low grade limestone and other raw materials to extend the life of
deposits of key raw materials for many industries.
Mining Equipment
Mobile crushes have high productivity, maximum utilisation and high
flexibility when used in conjunction with flexible belt conveyor systems
and should therefore find more application in the cement industry in
future.
Processes
The cement industry as it stands today is a combination of old and
small capacity wet process kilns and modern precalcinator plants
incorporating the latest technological advancements.
The plants built in the ‘80’s incorporated instrumentation, with
centralised plant operation through PLCs / computer. Specific
computerised software package like Raw Mix control, process control
and optimisation, refractory management system, Electrical energy
management system, etc. have been adopted by the plants for process
optimisation. These plants have fuel consumption in the range of 750-
800 kcal/kg clinker and power consumption about 95-120 Kwh / tonne
of cement.
Latest Technology Trends
The new built in the Plants incorporate the latest in hardware and aim
to achieve very low thermal and electric energy consumption and are
comparable to plants being built elsewhere in the world. Some of the
important technological advancements adopted by these plants, are :
Preblending beds for coal.
Roll Press for raw material grinding in finish mode.
Low-pressure grate Coolers with higher recuperation efficiency.
Roll Presses for grinding of slag in finish mode and Clinker with
Open / closed circuit Ball Mill together with high – efficiency
Separators.
Specially designed Computer Software Systems for Raw Material
evaluation and Management on – line Raw Mix control, refractory
management process control and optimisation electrical energy
management and plant maintenance management etc.
Captive power plants to ensure continuous operation by running
these in parallel with grid.
These plants have been able to achieve heat consumption level around
700-725 kcal/kg clinker and require 90-100 kwh of electrical energy
per tonne of cement.
Presently 85% of the cement production is being contributed by
modern energy efficient dry process plants.
New devices to reduce energy consumption are costly and
substantially imported, thus increasing their landed cost. This offsets
the gains of reduced power consumption and prohibits its application
on a wider scale in the industry. The world bank lines of credit I, II and
III have been offered largely for this purpose and industry has been
availing of this facility.
QUALITY UPGRADATION
Quality Control in Cement Manufacture
Following sophisticated controls are now being practiced by the
cement plants for quality control purposes :
Computerized mine planning and deposit evaluation.
Computerized fuzzy logic control system.
Computer Aided – Instrumentation and process measurements
using gas analyzers, temperature and pressure measuring devices
etc.
Use of flow control diaphragms classifying liners high efficiency
separators to ensure better particle size distribution for optimum
performance of cement.
On-line x-ray fluorescence spectrometer for raw mill control and raw
mix.
Quality Management and Assurance
Indian cement industry has recognized that ISO 9000 quality system
certification is extremely important for quality, reliability and
competitiveness. About 20 cement plants in India so far have been
awarded ISO 9000 certification and about 40 cement plants are at
various stages of quality system implementation.
After installation of quality system in line with ISO 9000 or
equivalent quality level stabilises at a defined level. However this
may not be sufficient as due to competitive environment the quality
level has to improve continuously keeping this in view a recently
introduced approach is total quality management (TAM) TQM
approach is also being put in practice and being used by few
cement plants ISO 9000 quality system installation is the first step
towards the TQM approach.
Research and Development
In today’s fast progressing world no industrial system can sustain
without R & D support. Also for desired results, research has to be
properly focused and mission-oriented. Further adequate funds have to
be made available for R&D.
R&D Units
During this decade a number of cement manufacturing organisation
have development their in house R & D units and today 12 such In-
house R & D units are recognised by DSIR. Data complied by Dept of
scientific and Industrial research on R & D units in India shows that In-
house R&D of units cement companies spends annually 0.08% to
0.57% of their turnover on technology development activities (average
0.29% of turnover), whereas R & D units of cement machinery
manufacturing companies spend 0.04 to 0.75% of the annual turnover
(average 0.55%). The manpower involvement in R&D is also very low
hardly 0.004%.
R&D Expenditure
The R&D expenditure in India as a percentage of the Gross National
Product (GNP) has been around 0.8% during last few years. For a
comparison most of the development countries spent between 2% and
3% of their GNP whereas some countries had spent even more than
4%. The expenditure on R&D as percentage of GNP for the whole world
was 2.55 in 2000; in the case of developing countries this being 0.64%.
R&D Personnel
India employs 4.50 scientific and technical personnel per thousand of
population as compared to about 185 for Canada and 111 for Japan.
Out of these only 0.27 S&T personnel were engaged in R&D activities
in India against 3.4 in Canada and 6.05 in Japan. These wide gaps in
manpower & capital investment on R&D needs bridging up because
the R&D can bring manifold returns to the industry.
TRANSPORATION AND HANDLING
Bulk Movement
In India less than 1 percent f the cement is transported in bulk while in
the industrially advanced countries, 70 to 80 percent of the cement
produced is transported in bulk. This has to be adopted in India as well
which would help in reducing the packaging, handling and
transportation cost besides reducing the load on rail and road transport
infrastructure.
The cement plants in India are concentrated in seven major clusters
near the large limestone deposits. In view of further capacity addition
in these cluster the conventional mode of cement transportation may
not be able to meet the increased demand. Therefore alternative ways
have to be developed for the transport of cement by bulk to the large
consuming centres like metropolitan cities and use of ready mix
concrete should be encouraged by government and concerned
agencies.
Raw materials conservation
Efforts should be directed to utilize marginal grade limestone to the
maximum possible extent in the cement manufacture. Benefaction of
limestone therefore is one area which deserves R&D attention.
Notwithstanding the above, the present raw material base for the
cement industry is not going to last forever and the use of various
agricultural industrial urban and rural waster generated to the tune of
2650 mt annually, need to be exploited as an alternate source of raw
material manufacture of fly ash and slag based cement should be
further encouraged to conserve limestone.
Present energy consumption levels
A study conducted by NCB, shows that the overall weighted average of
the studied units energy consumption is of the order of 880 kca/kg
clinker and 110.6 kwh/t cement.
Table below gives process wise energy consumption of Indian cement
industry from 1999-00 to 2001-02.
Energy consumption data
Item 1999-00 2000-01
2001-02
1. Heat consumption, kcal / kg cl. Dry process plants
855.83 827.82 814.87
2. Heat consumption, lcal / kg. Cl. Wet process plants
1319.39 1359.48 1339.54
3. Heat consumption, kcal/kg/cl. Semi-dry process plants
958.99 949.31 943.61
4. Power consumption, kwh/t cement Dry process plants
119.18 115.27 111.93
5. Power consumption kwh/t cement Wet process plants
108.68 108.18 100.65
6. Power consumption, kwh/t cement Semi-dry process plants
121.34 116.20 113.03
Note : Based on data of 33 dry process, 3 wet process and 3 semi-dry process plants.
Kcal / Kg. cl. Kilo Colories per kilogram of clinker
KWH/t Kilo Watt Hours Per Tonne
The average specific energy consumption levels of various countries
are given below :
ENERGY CONSUMPTION LEVEL IN CEMENT MANUFACTURE IN
DIFFERENT COUNTRIES
Country Specific Thermal Energy Consumption
(kcal / kg. CI)
Specific Electrical Energy Consumption
(Kwh/t Cement)
France 910 110
Germany 760 105
Japan 730 95
South Korea 790 120
Switzerland 825 95
Taiwan 850 120
USA 1080 135
Source : NCB
It could be seen that the energy consumption levels in cement
industry, when compared to some other countries like Japan are high
and there is scope for the industry to improve further. The NCB study,
however showed that the energy consumption levels over the years
have been going down.
Energy Conservation Action Plan
An action plan evolved for reducing the gap in energy consumption
between India and overseas countries and for achieving world
standards includes :
House – Keeping and operational control.
Process optimisation.
Technology upgradation.
Use of energy efficient equipment.
Fuel substitution by lignite, natural gas agricultural industrial and
combustible wastes.
Use of renewable energy sources like wind power solar energy etc.
Energy management which includes manpower training target
setting and regular monitoring motivational steps and regular
energy auditing.
Improving the quality of power to the plants.
Action plan should lay emphasis on periodic regular energy audit and
phased modernisation by retro fitting of energy efficient equipment
wherever feasible.
Incentives offered to power sector for power generation meant for
public distribution system may also be extended to those cement
plants which install their own captive power generation system for
cement plant operation.
Dust Emission Levels
The emission limits prescribed in our country and the limits laid down
in some other countries are given below :
Prescribed Dust Emission Limits in India and Abroad
Name of the Country Emission Limit mg/Nm3
India (for large plants only) 150/50 (for New Kilns)
Australia 50
Germany 50
South Africa 120
Switzerland 50
Japan 100
U.S.A. 100/50
Portugal 100 (existing kilns)
50 (new kilns)
In a survey conducted in 2002 the Central pollution control board
found that 55 cement plants are fully complying with the pollution
standards as given below ;
Pollutions Standards Compliance Status - 2002
Number of Units
Surveyed Fully Complying
Partially Complying
Not Complying
Not in Operation
97 55 23 12 7
Levels of permissible dust emissions in India for new capacities is 50
mg/Nm3. This is even lower than norms in some of the developed countries as indicated
below :
S. No.
Country Production of Cement in
concentrated zones Per. Sq. Km
(Tonnes)
SPM Norms Prescribed mg/nm3
1. India 385-880 50
2. Japan 3700-5400 100
Source : Pollution Control in Cement Industry – paramenters ands
programmes of FICCI 1999.
Therefore, there is need to have a fresh look at the recently prescribed
SPM levels by the authorities for new plants.
NB : Constraints faced by the cement industry in complying with the
emission regulations are manifold like poor quality of coal and power,
which need to be tackled.
In view the above it is suggested that the present SPM emission level
of 150 mg/Nm3 should be maintained for some more time and
gradually reduced to the ultimate target of achieving 50 mg/Nm3 and
he gradual achievement shall be possible over a period of 15 years.
Studies abroad have established that the Cement Kiln Dust (CKD) and
limestone dust are neither a hazard to health nor to the agriculture.
Rather, the KCD is an agricultural lime and fertilizer and allowed to be
used so in U.S.A. The US occupational health agencies have found in a
survey in 1999 that in general the cement workers are healthier than
the average for the population. It is however, suggested that some
studies be instituted in India also to examine the long term effect of
cement dust if any on workers and in population of nearby regions to
cement plants by the Indian Medical Council or other appropriate
agency.
Environmental Improvement and Environment Audit
The concept of environment, Audit (Statement) is comparatively new
to the Indian Cement Industry and the objective is to provide
assurance to top management that all stipulated regulatory standards
are being met in accordance with Central / State Pollution Central
Board norms.
A recently introduced Environmental Management Systems (EMS)
certification is an opportunity that can enable companies to acquire
the label of environmentally sound enterprises and also accrue the
benefits of improved performance. These EMS standards do not
letdown specific environmental performance criteria, but requires
organisation to formulate policies and objectives taking into account,
information about significant environmental effects. Indian Cement
Industry can also go in for this.
Man Power and Training
The introduction of new technology has reduced manpower per unit of
cement production the production results rely on the full utilisation of
the potential of all equipments and this can only be achieved by the
human resources applying good operation and maintenance
procedure. This calls for higher qualifications and continuous training.
Recommendations
1. The use of advanced computer aided software for mine planning are
suggested as this not only enables reliable estimation of mineral
reserves, grade effective blending and pit design but also facilitates
environment friendly and cost effective mining through optimisation
of production schedule.
2. The use of surface miners is recommended where ever possible as
drilling and blasting operations are eliminated resulting in cost
reduction in mining operation as well as avoiding noise and dust
pollution.
3. Mobile crushers have high productivity, maximum utilisation and
high flexibility when used in conjunction with belt conveyor systems
and therefore should be considered for application.
4. Conversion of existing wet process plants to dry process plants
should be speeded up by offering a special package consisting of
various concessions including fiscal and soft loans.
5. For upgrading the technology of existing plants, energy
conservation, pollution control and cost reduction the cement plants
should prepare “Technology Upgradation Plant” for their existing
operations.
6. Dispersal of Industry by developing new clusters like in North – East
etc. having substantial quantity of cement grade limestone, should
be considered to cut down on transport costs reduce strain on
Infrastructure like railways and roads.
7. From modernizing Cement dispatches the industry my go in for
Auto-feed of bags to packing machines.
Mechanical computer control loading of cement bags in trucks.
Palletisation of cement bags and loading of pallets instead of
individual ags in trucks and wagons.
8. Efforts should be made to utilise Inland River water Transport
system for the movement of cement from clusters to the large
cement consuming centres. Rivers like Ganga and Narmada can be
tapped for movement Eastward and Westward.
9. The cement industry should move towards Total Quality
Management for Quality improvement and better international
competitiveness, acceptability and business excellence.
10. Alignment of Indian Standards on cement with corresponding
International standards within a reasonable timeframe will give a
boost to export share of Indian cement in the international market.
11. Suitable package of incentives for R & D investments need to be
evolved common for all industries to boost R & D effort.
12. R & D in cement industry should be directed towards.
Technological developments in the process of cement manufacture
and related plant and machinery and systems design.
Operational improvements to ensure cost reduction, productivity
enhancement environment protection and quality improvement.
Proper grade of cement to be used in construction for ensuring
durability and identify areas for use of cement for newer
applications.
13. Efforts should be directed to develop technology to utilize
marginal grade limestone to the maximum possible extent in the
cement manufacture.
14. Energy conservations should be given further thrust.
15. Incentives offered to private sector for power generation meant
for public distribution system may also be extended to those
cement plants which install their own power generation system
exclusively for cement plant operation.
16. Levels of permissible dust emissions in India for new capacities is
50 mg/Nm. This is even lower than norms in some of the developed.
Therefore it is necessary to have a fresh look at the prescribed SPM
levels by the authorities.
17. Keeping in view the local conditions and other trade off’s
between cost and benefits, frequent dialogue between Industry and
Pollution Control Authorities is necessary to voluntarily evolve an
action plan and set a target for gradual implementation.
18. The present SPM emission level 250 mg/Nm3 and for existing
capacities may continue for some more time Gradual reduction in a
phased manner be allowed over a further period of say 5 years for
all the plants.
19. Before further reduction of SPM levels is considered it would be
prudent to ensure full compliance of existing regulations. For this
the industry may go in for :
Continuous stack monitoring installation with Data Logging facilities.
Interlocking of pollution control equipment and production line. This
needs detailed examination and defining of maximum allowed
Disturbance Time so that the continuously operated cement plants
are not made to trip frequently due to variations in quality of inputs
like coal and power.
20. A detailed inventory of SO2 and Nox generation from kiln stacks
of existing units should be carried out. These levels should be
considered as the basis for fixing norms for SO2 and Nox in
consultation with the cement industry in future.
21. State Pollution Central Boards should not insist for any specific
selection of air pollution control equipment and should leave in to
the judicious decision of the industry.
22. Studies be instituted to examine the effect of limestone / cement
dust on health of workers and surrounding populations by Indian
Medical Council or some appropriate agency as has been by US &
Britain.
TARIFF AND TAXATION
Role of Cement
Cement plays an important role in the development of social and
commercial infrastructures which are considered prime engines of
economic development.
Increasing per capital consumption
The economic status of any country is reflected in its per capita
consumption of cement steel and power. Though India is the fourth
largest producer of cement in the world, the average per capira
consumption of cement in India is approx. 71 kg. (world average
around 250 kg.), which is ver low as compared to developed /
developing countries. The consumption of cement in India has to catch
up with the level achieved in developed / developing countries. This
can be achieved by more efficient usage like laying concrete roads,
increasing availability of housing water conserving canal lining etc. An
additional capacity of about 35 mil.t. is expected to be set up I the IX
Plan to meet the growing needs of the economy and for this an
investment of the order of over Rs. 30,000 crores will be required not
only for expansion of capacity but also for improving infrastructure
support in the areas of coal mining rail transport power etc.
Contribution to revenue
The cement industry is a stable source of revenue to government
exchequer
Levies on Cement
The total levies / duties (Excise duty, Sales Tax Royalty on limestone / Coal, Govt. duty
on power tariff etc) on cement amount to Rs. 767 per tonne. The present scenario of tax
burden on cement in India in given below.
Taxes and Levies on Cement Rs. / Tonne of Cement
Royalty & less on limestone 38
Royalty on coal 20
Duties on Power tariff 16
Excise on stores & spares 4
Excise duty on cement 350
Sales tax on Stores & Spares / Raw Materials / Packing Materiel / Octroi etc.
20
Total 767
The incidence of taxes / levies on cement works out to about 60% of
average exfactory price of naked cement as shown below :
Incidence of Taxes and Levies
Items Rs / Per Tonne of Cement (Avg.)
Ex-factory price 1275
Duties / levies 767
Packaging 120
Freight 438
Total 2600*
(*Typical selling price excluding local transportation and dealers
margin.)
A comparative statement showing the tax burden on cement industry
in India vis-à-vis other developed / developing and cement exporting
countries is given below :
Specific or Ad valorem
There have been discussion whether excise duty structure for cement
industry could be Ad-Valorem. The cement industry represented to the
Govt. to continue excise duty at the specific rate. The plea of cement
industry is that cement production is continuous process and its shelf
life in silo/bags is limited. Therefore around 70-80% cement produced
in the factory is normally removed to sale depots on stock transfer
basis and its sale price is fixed at the time of its actual sale. Around 18
to 25% of vale constitutes freight. Therefore value for excise arrived at
by deducting transport and other expenses after leaving the factory
will vary considerably depending on the location of plant marketing
region mode of transport etc.
Also in case of cement industry the present regime with specific duty
has simplicity certainty and finality present in the system and there is
no leakage thus 100% compliance is assured with no litigation.
Cement intensive infrastructure projects
The ongoing economic reforms of the Govt. attach a high priority to the
better utilisation of existing infrastructure assets of existing
infrastructure assets and development of new infrastructure so that
infrastructure bottlenecks do not inhibit the overall economic growth.
Projects like concrete roads, concreate canal linings large Govt.
projects on housing are highly cement intensive and are also sensitive
to the cost of cement. A suitable remission of excise duty on cement
used for above projects would go a long way in spurring fast growth of
the most essential transport infrastructure ands vital social necessities
for country’s economic development.
Ready Mixed Concrete Plants
Many technological advances in construction industry prevalent all
over the world are yet to take roots in India. Ready Mixed Concrete
(RMC) is one such area. The concept of RMC is fairly new in India. It
envisages mixing cement with aggregates (stone), under controlled
conditions and moving the mixed concrete to the site instead of mixing
at construction site itself amidst other activities. The use of RMC avoids
pollution at construction site, reduces transport cost ensures uniform
and standard quality of consecrate according to customers
requirements does away with heaps of aggregates sands usual cement
bags ands dust nuisance etc. prevents congestion on the roads and
footpaths at the construction sites. Companies planning to enter the
field are suffering from fear psychosis over the levy of Central Excise
duty on RMC. As no excise duty is applicable on such site based RMC,
RMC should be exempted from the levy of Central Excise Duty.
Royalties
The Royalty on limestone works out to over Rs. 38 per tonne. The
pitmouth value of limestone on an average work out to Rs. 45 to 50
per tonne. The rate royalty on limestone should be a reasonable
percentage of PMV.
Import duty on Coal
The quality as well as quantity of coal supplied to cement industry is
worsening year after year. Also plants in South and West are located
farthest to coalfields and served poorly by rail. The industry has
managed to keep up the production by using partly lignite which is of
restricted availability and partly by importing coal in limited quantity.
However 35% import duty on coal makes it very costly. Therefore
import duty on coal may be brought down to 5% in line with coke
imported for steel plants. This will increase the efficiency of industry
and also reduce the pressure on rail movement as the railway wagons
released from serving these long lead plants can serve the other plants
better.
MODVAT
At present MODVAT on packaging for cement in given where the
packaging is done at the manufacturing end i.e. at factory. However
when loose cement or bulk cement is transported by sea or rail to a
bulk terminal away from the manufacturing unit and packaging is done
at the Bulk Terminal the MODVAT on packaging material is denied
because the Bulk Terminal is not considered as a part of the
manufacturing facility. It is fair that the same MODVAT facility that is
given for packaging at the manufacturing end should also be made
available when cement gets transported in bulk and unbarred from to
modern cement terminals and is packed at the terminals MODVAT
benefit be allowed on HSD/any used for generation of electricity in
outside the factory for production of the final product i.e. cement.
Limestone is a major raw material for manufacturing cement, for
excavating limestone huge investment on machineries have been
made by the industry. MODVAT Credit on such capital goods is not
being allowed on the ground that these goods are not used in the
factory but outside the factory. Mines are part and parcel of cement
therefore MODVAT Credit should be allowed on capital goods used in
the captive mines.
Promotion of Bulk Transportation of Cement
To encourage usage and transportation of cement in bulk the Govt.
should introduce differential excise duty of Rs. 50/- per tonne on bulk
bagged cement.
Incentive for Setting up Captive Power Plants
To insulate against the power shortage cement industry is installing
captive power plants by making huge investments. No incentives are
available for installation of captive power plants. Cement units
installing captive power plants should get same incentives as in the
case of installation of power plants by private entrepreneur.
Confessional rate of Import Duty
To make the existing and new cement units environment friendly and
energy efficient the custom duty on equipments and machinery used
for pollution control and energy saving devices be charged at the same
rate as for project imports.
Cement Regulation Account (CRA)
Around Rs. 60 crores are lying idle in the Cement regulation Account
(CRA). After making an allowance for the dues of certain cement
companies the Govt. many transfer the rest of the funds at the
disposal of Development Council for cement industry for its effective
utilisation in promotional areas like exploration of limestone reserves
modernising cement distribution and usage in bulk and improving
facilities for export and other similar areas for development of the
cement industry.
Sale Tax
Sales Tax on cement varies from State to State ; it ranges from 5% to
17%. Govt. may consider that cement be included in the list of
‘Declared Goods’ so that cement attracts a uniform low rate of Sales
Tax all over the country.
Suggestions / Recommendations
The continuation of specific rate of excise duty on cement should be
considered favorably by the Govt.
A suitable remission of excise duty on cement used for large
projects like :
Concrete Roads
Concrete Canal Linings
Government Housing Projects.
Would go a long way in spurring fast growth of the most essential
transport infrastructure and vital social necessities for county’s
economic development. To encourage private builders / individuals
building houses, Government should set up housing financing
agencies banking and mortgage facilities to make funds available at
low rate of interest in this sector.
Exempt Ready Mixed Concrete (RMC) from the levy of Central
Excise Duty Without incentives the concept of RMC will not take off
in India.
Royalty on Limestone should be livied primarily as a percentage of
Pit Month Value (PMV) and it should be reasonable.
Import duty on coal be brought down to 5% from existing 35%. This
will not only go a long way to increase efficiency of cement
production but also release railway wagons locked up in long
cirucits thereby easing movement in other areas.
MODVAT facility which is available for packaging cement at the
manufacturing end should be made available when cement gets
transported in bulk and unbarred from to modern cement terminals
and is packed at the terminals.
MODVAT benefit should be allowed on HSD / any fuel oil used for
generation of electricity in / outside the factory for production of
final produce.
MODVAT Credit should be allowed on Capital goods used in Captive
Mines.
Introduce a differential rate of Rs. 50/- per tonne excise duty on
cement between bulk and bagged cement.
Suitable incentives on the lines of power plants being set up by
private entrepreneur may also be considered by Govt. for he
Captive Power Plants being set up the cement industry in or outside
the factory.
Policy on Captive Power Plants should be made unambiguous and
clear.
The Import Duty on Cement project may be levied at the same rate
for power projects i.e. 20% against the present rate of 25% + 10%
CVD.
The Custom Duty on Equipment and Machinery used for Pollution
control and Energy Saving Devices be charged at the same rate as
for project imp[orts.
Govt. may transfer the surplus fund lying in Cement Regulation
Account to a development fund at the disposal of development
council for cement industry under the ministry of industry for its
effective utilisation in promotional area which are essential for the
development of cement industry in the country.
Govt. may consider that cement be included in the list of ‘Declared
Goods’ under the provisions of central Sales Tax Act. So that
cement attracts a uniform low rate of sales tax all over the country.