28
SEDIMENTATION ANALYSIS OF THATIPUDI RESERVOIR USING REMOTE SENSING & GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM By Shahera Begum (10331A0149) P.V.Srivardhan (10331A0142) G.Rajya Lakshmi (10331A0121) K.Gana Chaitanya (10331A0123) B.Jhansi (10331A106) Under the Guidance of Mr. A. Vara Prasad M.Tech (RS & GIS) Assistant Professor

Report B.Tech

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Report B.Tech

SEDIMENTATION ANALYSIS OF THATIPUDI RESERVOIR USING REMOTE SENSING & GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM

ByShahera Begum (10331A0149) P.V.Srivardhan (10331A0142)

G.Rajya Lakshmi (10331A0121) K.Gana Chaitanya (10331A0123)

B.Jhansi (10331A106)Under the Guidance of

Mr. A. Vara Prasad M.Tech (RS & GIS)Assistant Professor

Page 2: Report B.Tech

Objectives

• To analyze the sedimentation rate of Thatipudi Reservoir basing on field survey

• To analyze the Land use and Land cover of study area for a period of 30 years using remote sensing.

• To analyze the drainage pattern of the study area using Geographical Information System.

Page 3: Report B.Tech

Description of Study area• Thatipudi Reservoir Project was constructed across

Gosthani River.• Location: Gantyada mandal, Vizianagaram disrict.• Latitude: North 18.1699 , Longitude: East 83.1975• Purpose: To irrigate a total ayacut of 15,378acres

(62.23sqkm).• Head work: Earthen and Gravity: 585m long.• Full reservoir level: 90.52m• Gross storage capacity: 94.164MCM.• Live storage capacity: 88.04MCM.

Page 4: Report B.Tech

Thatipudi reservoir along with its watershed and drainage pattern

Page 5: Report B.Tech

Methodologies

Topographical Satellite Field Work

Contour Toposheet Analysis

Base Map Creation

Selection of Study Area

Procurement of Satellite Images

Re-sampling of Satellite Images

Supervised Classification

Geo Referencing

Data Processing

Actual water spread and volume estimation

Comparison & Analysis

Classified Image

Sample signature

Recoding

Drainage

DEM

Data collection

Results & Recommendations

Page 6: Report B.Tech

Data collection• Data was collected from irrigation department which constitutes of details

related to precipitation, inflow, outflow, capacity of reservoir for the past 30 years i.e., from 1980-2013.

• Area elevation curve of Thatipudi reservoir is also collected.• Satellite images from National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC) and earth

explorer were also taken for land use and land cover analysis. The dates for which the satellite images were classified are:

From Earth Explorer website-In the year 1973,October, year 1975 December, year 1977 February

From NRSC-In the year 1988, October, year 1990, February From Bhuvan -In the year 2009, October, year 2011, December• Water depths at various locations in the reservoir were measured to

compute the amount of sediment upto year 2014.

Page 7: Report B.Tech

1.Estimation of volume of sediment based on field survey conducted on 28th February, 2014

Field survey – • Depth of water column at various locations were determined

in the reservoir area.• The average value of depth of water column was taken and

depth of sediment deposited on the reservoir bed was calculated with respect to bed level.

• Amount of sedimentation was calculated using prismoidal formula.

Page 8: Report B.Tech

Water depth of reservoir

Average water column is 52.387 ftDepth of sediment deposited is given by Level upto which sediment is deposited - Bed level = (Reservoir level - Average water column)-Bed level = (292 - 52.387) - 220 =19.613 ft

Page 9: Report B.Tech

Sediment calculation

Prismoidal formula is given by: V=H(A1+A2+√A1*A2) / 3WhereV=volume of sediment deposited H=Difference in depth between two successive depth contoursA1=Cross section area within the outer depth under considerationA2= Cross section area within the inner depth under consideration

The total volume of sediment deposited is 51.84 MMCF

Page 10: Report B.Tech

Results obtained from field survey:Volume of sediment obtained yearly basing on rainfall data

Page 11: Report B.Tech
Page 12: Report B.Tech

Graph showing sediment deposition and annual rainfall versus years

Page 13: Report B.Tech

2.By creating 3D-DEM:• Surface areas from different time periods are obtained based on different images

available.• Contours are generated based on those areas and Reservoir DEM is created.• Similarly another DEM is created based on the water level depths obtained from

field survey data.• In Arc Scene, those two DEMs are overlapped and the sediment volume is

calculated , i.e., the volume under sediment plane.• The approximate volume of sediment is found to be 63MMCF

Page 14: Report B.Tech

Result obtained:

Reservoir side viewReservoir 3D view

Reservoir with sediment plane 1 Reservoir with sediment plane 2

The estimated sediment volume is found to be 63MMCF by 2014.

Page 15: Report B.Tech

3.Land use and land cover analysis

Image classification is done to know the land use pattern.• It is mainly done in 3 steps:

1. Geo-referencing: The available satellite image is geo-referenced to an already available reference image like a topo-sheet2. Subset: The geo-referenced image is then clipped to the required watershed area3. Supervised classification: The clipped image is then classified on the basis of supervised classification

• The change in cover for different years is analyzed and the possible sedimentation causes are determined.

Page 16: Report B.Tech

Results of supervised classification1973

Page 17: Report B.Tech

1975

Page 18: Report B.Tech

1977

Page 19: Report B.Tech

1988

Page 20: Report B.Tech

1990

Page 21: Report B.Tech

2009

Page 22: Report B.Tech

2011

Page 23: Report B.Tech

Comparizon of percentage area of each class

The table enlisted above for various classes depicting the areal spread clearly shows that major part of the water shed is vegetation. In the year 1988 and 1990 there was a sudden decrease in vegetative cover which might be due to deforestation. In these years area under agricultural increased tremendously.

Page 24: Report B.Tech

Percentage area under each class versus years

Page 25: Report B.Tech

4.Drainage pattern determination

Page 26: Report B.Tech

Drainage pattern in the year 2005 and 2011

Page 27: Report B.Tech

Discussions• The amount of sedimentation obtained using theoretical

formula was 51.84 MCft where as that obtained by using Arc GIS was around 63 MCft. If better survey methods would have been used then the values might have been more comparable.

• Basing on rainfall data the estimation of sediment deposited yearly plotted in the form of graph shows a deviation in the year 1990 which is very high compared to other years.

• In the year 1990 the vegetation area suddenly reduced which might be the possible reason for increase in sediment deposition.

Page 28: Report B.Tech

Thank you