Click here to load reader
Upload
jeffrey-wilks
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NRHANational Rural Health Alliance
CATALOGUE SEARCH HELP HOME
RETURN TO JOURNAL PRINT THIS DOCUMENT
Remote nursing services at island tourist resorts
J. Wilks, S. Walker, M. Wood, J. Nicol and B. Oldenberg
The Australian Journal of Rural Health © Volume 3 Number 4, November 1995
Aust. J. Rural Health (1995) 3, 179-185
Original Article
REMOTENURSINGSERVICESATISLAND TOURISTRESORTS
School of Public He&h; Queensland LTniuersity of Technology and Nationul Reference
Centre for Classification in He&h, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane;
Queensland, ilustrulia
ABSTRACT: Based on a 6 month retrospectke analysis of clinic records> rhe present stud>- reports
a detailed projile of nursing sewices provided for guests at three tropical island tourist resorts. .A
total of 1183 clinic oisits xere anallsed, with presentations coded according to the International
Classification of Primary Care 1ICPCl. T/ le main reasons for presentation zcere skin problems: ear
disorders, respiratory, digestive and muscnloskeletal complaints. Health services consisted mainly-
of medication, specialist nursing cure and fast aid. Study findings highlight the importance of
using an internationally accepted class$cation system for primary health research, and the
critical role of the nurse in tourist health sercices.
KEY WORDS: nurses, remote locations; sew-ice delivery, tourism.
INTRODUCTION
According to Thornton1 ‘a remote area nurse
(RAN) is any RN employed in a community that
is geographically isolated from medical facilities.
The nurse works on a 24 hour oa-call basis, serv-
ing communities throughout Australia ranging
from approximately 200 to 1300 people’ (p. 10).
Despite the difficulties Gth a distinct classifica-
tion of rural, remote or isolated,’ the problems
experienced by both rural and remote nurses are
generall!; similar> and stem from geographical iso-
lation from support systems including peers and
education centres.3
Correspondence: J. Klks. School of Public Health, Queensland Unil-ersit!- of Technology, Locked Bag 2.
Red Hill, Qld 4059. Australia.
Acceptedforpublication June 199.2
In man>- remote areas the nurse often works
alone. el-en if a centre is staffed IX more than one
registered nurse. &cording to Armit, these
nurses haT-e a multifaceted role that includes
medical care: counselling, dealing with social
problems. preT-entir-e medicine and many non-
nursing duties (L. Xrmit. unpubl. data, 1995).
In the late 1970s there were fete published
accounts of the life of the remote area nurse in
Au,stralia. Kth the establishment of the Council
of Remote -1rea Nurses (CR-U-4) more informa-
tion is becoming available, and greater opportuni-
ties for remote area nurses to share their
experiences at annual conferences.A-J
A relatil-ely ileT\- context for nursing services:
and one that has receiI-ed little attention, is the
nurse who is emplo>med at isolated tourist destina-
tions. These positions in the field of ‘tourist
health’ are often perceil-ed as glamorous and
180 ALJSTRALIANJOURNALOFRURALHEALTH
exciting, but the range of services required is as customers, drawing attention to the possible
diverse and challenging as any encountered by health and safety problems that might be experi-
nurses in remote locations. enced during a vacation is not a positive market-
Tourist health is a relatively new field of study ing strategy. Therefore, health and safety issues
concerned with protecting, promoting and restor- are generally not mentioned in promotional mate-
ing the health of tourists both as individuals and rial8 and operators rely heavily on existing med-
as a population group.6 Tourist health therefore ical services and insurance to cover their legal
includes all aspects of medicine (both curative responsibilities should a problem arise.
and preventive), as well as a wide range of public The advantages of having a resident nurse at a
health topics, such as food safety, protection tourist destination include legal protection and a
against injuries, infections and communicable demonstration that the duty of care owed to cus-
diseases. tomers is adequately discharged,7%9-10 profes-
Nurses working at commercial tourist facili- sional health care that ensures appropriate
ties provide what has previously been described treatment of medical conditions and injuries
as a silent customer service.7 While tourist opera- should they arise and finally avoidance of situa-
tors are interested in protecting the health of their tions where a minor health issue could disrupt a
TABLE 1: Nursing stqfSat tropical island resorts on the Great Barrier Reef
Island
lTSOll
No. of Part-lime/
full-time
Other
duties
Clinic
h OUl??
On 24hour
call
Yes
Yes
Hayman
Hamilton ‘i;
3 3 Full No
1 1 Full No
Great Keppel 1
Heron 1
Dunk 2
Brampton
Lizard
Lindeman
Daydream 2
South Molle 2
Green
Fitzroy
Long Island
1 Full No
1 Part Yes
1 Full
1 Part
2 Part
2 Part
2 Full
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
1 Full No
1 Part
1 Full Yes
1 Part
1 Full No
1 Full Yes
1 Full Yes
1 Part
9am-6pm
9am-12 noon
3pm-6pm
9am-1 lam
4pm-5pm
9am-loam
4spm-5pm
9am-loam
4#pm-5pm
9an-loam
4pm-5pm
Sam-12:30pm
5pm-7:30pm
9am-11:30am
3pm-5pm
9:30am-10:30am
2pm-5pm
None
None
None
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Clinic
See
Free
$35
$10
$10
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
Free
$10
Call out
fee
$50
$75
$35
$25
$20
$25
$35
Free
$60
Free
Free
Free
$40
*’ Hamilton Island is the only resort with a resident medical practitioner as well as nursing staff.
REMOTE NURSING AT TOURIST ISLANDS: J. A;ILKI’ ET AL. 181
vacation. The latter issue is one that has emerged
recently with successful legal claims against
tourist operators for disappointment with travel
experiences.ll
Nurses are employed at many of the Great
Barrier Reef island resorts (Table 1). Their
responsibilities generally involve being a\-ailable
on 24-hour call: rumiing regular clinics, manage-
ment of pharmaceutical supplies, consultation
with mainland medical practitioners, lrorkplace
health and safety duties and co-ordination of all
health requirements for their resort. Clinics are
generally run as ‘cost recovery’ centres, with \Tari-
ous fees charged for customers using health ser-
vices during clinic opening times and for
out-of-hours work. Nursing staff carry either
radios or pagers to maintain constant contact with
the resort duty manager.
Table 1 shows that there is considerable l-aria-
tion in the type of nursing services offered across
the islands. In some cases, nurses are emplo!-ed
full-time and have no other duties. In others. the
nurse may be required to work in other resolt
activities such as front office, housekeeping. the
laundry or child care. Call out fees are sometimes
paid directI>- to the m7rse for delilmering se77-ices
in the middle of the night: but most often the
resort receives this payment. There are also l-aria-
tions in the costs charged to patients for materials
such as dressings and medications, as well as
separate charges at some resorts for the nurse
consulting ])I- telephone with a mainland medical
practitioner. Hamilton is the only island resort on
the Great Ballier Reef where there is a resident
medical practitioner> allowing patients to recol-er
the cost of sell-ices through Medicare.
As domestic and international tourism
increases in Australia: the Comnion~realth
Department of Tourism anticipates that additional
pressures will be placed on the capacit!- of health
and safety services to meet the needs of visitors.‘”
Overseas studies show that up to ;8% of short-
term travellers to the tropics or to Europe report
some health impairment.l3 While most of these
self-reported health problems are not severe
(2143% felt ill; but only 5% needed medical
attention, and less than 1% required admission to
hospital), the current lack of information on med-
ical conditions and injuries experienced by
tourists visiting Australia remains a major obsta-
cle for effective health services planning.739
Kurses, especially those employed at tourist des-
tinations, are an important go”p in protecting the
health of travellers.
Given the possible range of services that
might be required in a remote location, health
care providers need to he aware of the types of
problems that can occur in tourist settings so that
injuries may be prevented and medical conditions
treated effectively. Wilks and Atherton have
recently proposed a frame\\-ork for a national
research program on tourist health.” One of the
key elements in this program is a focus on health
services provided for travellers outside the hospi-
tal setting, especially health needs at the holiday
destination.
In gathering information about primary health
services for ambulatory patients several intelna-
tional classification systems are apmailable. This
study used the International Classification of Pri-
mary Care (ICPC), since it has previously been
applied and validated in a T-ariet!- of clinical set-
tings.‘-‘, Other classifications similar to the ICPC,
such as the International Classification of Health
Problems in Primary Care (ICHPPC-P), have
been used I,>- Lialr to deTmelop patient profiles for
casualt>- presentations at a small rural hospitall”
and for a mral general practice.16 -1pplication of
the ICPC in settings such as island resort clinics
prox’ides an oppoi-t~7nit!~ to test the classification
sl-slem T\-ith a unique set of primal?- health pre-
sentations ant1 to compare remote health care ser-
I~ices across geographical settings.
In tliij stud!-. it was predicted that most of the
health problems ezperieiiced b!- tourists visiting
tropical island resorts would be of an acute
nature. Injuries were expected to be similar to
those experienced I~!~ beach T-isitors in Victoria,
especialI\- lacerations, sprains and strains, sun-
burn and insect bites.17 Medical conditions were
expected to be similar to those reported by pas-
sengers on cruise ships, specificallv presentations
182 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH
for respiratory, musculoskeletal and gastro-
intestinal ailments.l*
It was also predicted that resident nurses
would be able to quickly and effectively treat
these problems, allowing guests to continue to
enjoy their vacation. Patient load was expected be
highest during the main holiday periods, and
lower in the shoulder season. Specialist nursing
services were expected to be required for most of
the presentations, followed by other nursing roles
(such as dispensing medication, liaison with
mainland medical practitioners), with only a rela-
tively small proportion of cases requiring simple
first aid that could have been provided by non-
nursing staff.
mation (names, adclresses) be recorded. Nurses
transferred summary information from their clinic
diaries to a study diary, noting the number of
patients seen each day and the reason for the
visit. Where there was sufficient information
available, a recording form was also completed
for each patient.
METHODS
Study diaries and forms were returned to the
university where they were coded by an experi-
enced health information manager. Medical condi-
tions and injuries were coded according to the
International Classification of Primary Care.l” A
10% random sample of records (r~=118) was blind
coded by a second researcher. Inter-coder reliabil-
ity was 0.90. Any unusual patient cases in the full
sample were then separately identified, cross-
checked and a coding category agreed upon. Data
were analysed using the computer program SPSS-X.
A 6 month retrospective review was made of
records for all guests attending health clinics at
three tropical island resorts off the coast of
Queensland during the period January-June,
1994. At the time of the study, written records
were kept by the clinic nurses in office diaries.
Individual records varied considerably; some
were very detailed, others referring only to the
nature of the service provided.
RESULTS
Reasons for presentation at the island clinics,
based on the primary diagnoses recorded by the
nurses are shown in Figure 1. The main reasons
for presentation were skin problems, ear disor-
ders, respiratory, digestive and musculoskeletal
complaints.
To standardise data collection a recording
form was developed. This form was based on
items used in injury report forms by the Queens-
land Division of Workplace Health and Safety, the
Queensland Injury Surveillance and Prevention
Project, the Queensland University of Technology,
and Standards Australia. The study form sought
details of each medical condition or injury pre-
sented at the clinics, including time of occur-
rence, location, activity at the time and causes of
injury. The form also contained a diagram of a
human figure (front and rear perspectives) to
allow any specific injury sites to be identified.
Details of the treatment provided and basic
demographic characteristics of the patient were
also noted.
The pie chart in Figure 1 was developed using
the ICPC main chapter headings. However, this
broad approach masks most of the detail in the
classification system. Respiratory complaints
accounted for 12.4% of clinic visits, mainly
related to colds/sore throats, chest infections,
Other Gt?neral
5.7%
To protect patient confidentiality, the forms
specifically requested that no identifying infor- FIGURE 1: Presentations to island clinics (n=l183).
REMOTE NURSING AT TOURIST ISLANDS: J. K-1LE;S ET ,4L. 183
FIGURE 2: Breakdown of major reasons for clinic
presentations (5%).
FIGURE 3: Presentations Edith digestive disorders
(n=141).
FIGURE 4: Presentations with other disorders
(n=l62).
upper respiratory tract infections and asthma.
The ‘other’ category here included tonsillitis and
nasal congestion. Figure 2 therefore presents a
breakdown of the major categories for clinical
presentation.
Due to the larger number of specific com-
plaints in the digestive and ‘other disorder’ cate-
400
FIGURE 6: Clinic visits by month.
gories these two groups are presented as separate
figures (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4).
Figure 5 shows the main health services pro-
vided to clinic attenders. The ‘other’ category
consisted mainly of telephone consultations with
a mainland medical practitioner.
A total of 14 patients required medical evacu-
ation to the mainland, and all xere subsequently
admitted to hospital. In terms of patient load, Fig.
6 shop that the greatest number of clinic atten-
dances occurred during January> corresponding to
the post-Christmas holiday period. February is a
quiet month. then there is another increase in
patient numbers during Marcll--April, correspond-
ing to the Easter holiday period. Max- is again rel-
ativeb quiet. xitli numbers beginning to increase
in June for the mid-~-ear school holiday period.
DISCESSION
The present study &oxs that nurses employed at
remote island tourist resorts are called upon to
184 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH
treat a wide variety of health conditions. As pre-
dicted, a majority of the island presentations were
of an acute nature and similar to the most com-
mon reasons for presentation at a small rural hos-
pital. 15 These included lacerations, ear disorders,
sprains and strains, upper respiratory tract infec-
tions and digestive disorders. The range of pre-
sentations was as diverse and challenging as any
that would normally be handled by mainland
medical practitioners. Medical conditions treated
by island nurses were also similar to those
reported for passengers visiting hospitals on
cruise ships in the Caribbean.18 In contrast to the
island cruise ship hospitals are staffed by med-
ical practitioners and have extensive equipment
available for diagnosis and treatment.
In terms of injuries, island clinic presenta-
tions were similar to those reported for beach vis-
itors in Victoria,17 though there were more cases
of bites and stings on the islands, and fewer pre-
sentations for sunburn. Island nurses provided a
range of services for their patients, including
specialist nursing care, assistance with medica-
tion, consultation with mainland medical practi-
tioners, first aid and, in 14 cases, co-ordination of
emergency medical evacuation. Many of these
services are clearly beyond the ability of resort
staff who are trained only in first aid, so there is a
strong argument that all island resorts employ a
resident nurse. In addition, the greatest patient
load occurred during the peak Christmas/new
year holiday season, and there were identified
increases in clinic visits for other corresponding
holiday periods. This has important implications
for health services planning by the resorts to
ensure that adequate numbers of nursing staff are
available during anticipated busy periods.
As noted by Thornton, a nurse working as the
sole health/medical representative in an isolated
community must be self-reliant and competent, a
good communicator with all types of people, sen-
sitive to individual needs, as well as having a
sound clinical background and an awareness of a
variety of health conditi0ns.J
Future studies need to examine in more detail
the role of nurses in remote tourist locations,
especiahy their operation of primary care clinics
as cost recovery centres, management of pharma-
ceuticals and dangerous drugs, patient coun-
selling and their specific contribution to customer
relations. Anecdotal evidence suggests that
nurses play an important role by ensuring that
guests who have become sick or injured in the
course of their vacation receive appropriate care
and therefore do not have their vacation disrupted
by health problems. This has critical financial
consequences for the resorts in terms of repeat
business and favourable word-of-mouth referrals.
As noted in the marketing literature, a customer
with a negative service experience will relate
their story to, on average, 11 other people.19
Island nurses are clearly in a position to rectify
potentially unpleasant guest experiences and are
therefore legitimate members of the tourism
industry. However, it will take time for industry
management to fully accept and appreciate the
important role of the nurse in customer service.
While use of the ICPC facilitated comparisons
between the present study data and that of other
primary health care research, the classification
system was generally found to be limited in sev-
eral ways. First, the system was too broad and
general in its coverage. The main categories, such
as the skin grouping, masked distinctions
between injuries and medical conditions. Second,
there is no mechanism in the classification
scheme to determine the cause of injuries. In this
area the external cause codes available from the
International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revi-
sion, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM)“O or the
more recent International Statistical Classifica-
tion of Diseases and Related Health Problems
(ICD-10)2r would be more useful.
These observations on the most appropriate
classification framework for understanding ambu-
latory presentations in remote health care settings
are important if isolated practitioners are to be
assisted in the best ways to record their service
delivery and identify specific education, training
and support needs.
REMOTE UL’RSIKG 1T TOURIST ISLAXDS: J. WLRS ET AL. 185
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study is part of a series conducted by the
National Reference Centre for Classification in
Health, with funding from the Australian Institute
of Health and Welfare. We would like to thank
John Angel and Lynda Peacock of Australian
Resorts Pty Ltcl for supporting this study and
allowing access to island clinic records. We are
especially grateful to the following clinic nurses
for data collection: Josephine Barnes, Doune
Heppner, Simone Dunn, Deborah Mahony. Kerrie
Paul, Janet Davies and dnne Larkin.
REFERENCES
1 Thornton B. The remote area nurse: Problems of
preparing for the role. Australian Nurses Journal
1991; 21: 10.
2 Buckle!- P. Gray G. Across the Spini&: Registered
i\‘urses W&king in Rural and Remote So11112 .4ris-
tralia. rldelaide: School of Nursing, Flinders Cni-
versity. 1993.
3 Cramer J. Dilemmas of Remote-Area PI-a&w. In
Gary G: Pratt R; eds. Issues in Australian ~\rr.rsi.ng
3. Melbourne: Churchill LiLingstone. 1992.
4 Council of Remote .Irea Xurses of Australia
(CRANA). 6th National Conference: Standds ojf
Remote Area i\;ursing Practice. Sydney-: CR.V-1.
1988.
5 Council of Remote Irea Nurses of iiustralia
(CR-\NII). 7th National Conference: Prinzrrri-
Health Cure in Remote Areas. Alice Springs:
CRANh. 1989.
6 Pasini ‘EX- Tour-ist health as a nex branch of public-
health. World Health Statistics Qzrar-ter!>- 1989:
42: 77-84.
7 Wilks J, Oldenburg B. T ourist health: The siIent
factor in customer service. .-Iustrnliull Jor~rncrl oj”
Hospilalitj- Management 199.5: 2: in press.
8 milks J; Atherton T. Calanaph P. .Id\-enture
tourism brochures: -in anal! sis of legal content.
Australian Jowncd of Hospitcdit~ Idanngernent
1994; 1: 47-53.
9 Wilks J; Atherton T. Health and safet!- in rius-
tralian marine tourism: -1 social. medical and
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
legal appraisal. Journal of Tourism Studies 1994;
5: Z-16.
Wilks J, Atherton T. Workplace health and safety:
An emerging issue for the Queensland tourism and hospitality industq. .Austru/ian Jozollrnal of
Leisure and Recreation 1994; 4: 37-41.
Atherton T. Package holidays: Tourist’s trial buy
or deal becomes operator’s trial by ordeal. Current
Commercial Law 1993; 1: 100-108.
Commonwealth Department of Tourism. Tourism
- .-lustraliaS Passport to Growth: A tVutiona1
Tourism Strategy. Canbexa: Commonwealth
Department of Tourism. 1992.
Steffen R. Travel medicine: Prevention based on
epidemiological data. Transactions of the Royal
Societ?. of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1991;
85: 156-162.
Lamberts H, Wood M, eds. ICPC: Internntional
Classz&ztion of Primary Care. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1987.
Liar ST. Casualty encomlters at a small rural hos-
pital. Australian Family Physician 1992; 2 1:
469-474.
Liaw ST. The diagnostic profile of a South Aus-
tralian rural practice. ,kstrnlian Famil?- Physi-
tiara 1991; 20: 1X-183.
Grenfell RD, Ross KN. Hoxr dangerous is that
visit to the beach? A pilot study of beach injuries.
Australian Farnil]. Phyician 1992; 2 1:
114~5-1148.
DiGiovanna T, Rosen T, Forsett R. SiIvertson K, Kelen GD. Shipboard medicine: -4 ne\\- niche for emergency medicine. .41znals of Emergenq. Medi-
cine 1992: 21: 1476-1479.
Horowitz J. Jurgens-Panak >*I. Total Customer Sat-
kfaction: Lessons -from 50 Companies with Top
Qualit!- Cust0me.r Serrice. London: Pitman Pub-
lishing. 1992.
National Coding Centre. iluskdian T’ersion -
Internationa! Classification of Diseases, 9th Reui-
sion: C!inical Mocl~$crrtiorl. Sy-dnex-: National Cod-
ing Centre. 199.5.
‘C;brld Health Organization. ICD-10: Interndonal
Stntisticd Class~f~cution of Diseases und Related
Heulth Problems, Tenth Recision. Geneva: World
Health Organization. 1992.