Upload
keitha
View
18
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines. Ray Vogel EPA/OAQPS. Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines. Key document in your “library”: “Title V Permit Review Guidelines” developed by EPA Region 9 Topics here correspond to many sections in Guidelines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Region 9 Title V Permit Review GuidelinesGuidelines
Ray Vogel
EPA/OAQPS
2
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines
Key document in your “library”: “Title V Permit Review Guidelines” developed by EPA Region 9
Topics here correspond to many sections in Guidelines Learning concepts gives basic understanding of what a permit
should contain
A little encouragement You can do this! Permit review can be done even by non-
technical people. It requires attention to detail, a focus on language and perseverance!
3
OutlineOutline
What permit should contain
Applicable requirements
Permit conditions
Practical Enforceability
Monitoring
Startup, shutdowns, malfunctions
4
How to Think About Permit ReviewHow to Think About Permit Review
Permit links emission unit with “applicable
requirement” under Clean Air Act
Your job as reviewer is to ensure permit
includes correct requirements and does not
exclude any that apply
5
How to Think about Permit ReviewHow to Think about Permit Review
Prioritize review. Focus on – Units with highest emissions
– Units with highly toxic pollutants
– Units with history of noncompliance
– Units with high number of startup, shutdown,
malfunction (SSM) reports
– Units with air pollution control devices
6
What Permit Should Contain
All applicable requirements– Examples: state and federal rules, state permit
terms Standard permit conditions required by part 70
– Examples: permit expires after 5 years, duty to provide information
Practically enforceable language– Examples: requirements to keep records,
eliminating vague permit conditions
7
What Permit Should Contain (cont.)
Source-specific monitoring, where needed– Example: testing or recordkeeping to show
compliance with emission limits or work practice standards
Reporting and recordkeeping– Example: Reports of excess emissions
Schedule of compliance, if source is out of compliance
Origin and authority citation
8
Introduction:Introduction:Applicable RequirementsApplicable Requirements
Applicable requirements are CAA requirements that
apply to Title V source
– Include regulations issued before permit but with future
compliance dates
Three broad types:
– State Implementation Plan (SIP)
– New source review (NSR) permits
– Federal requirements: NSPS, MACT, NESHAPs
9
Introduction: Applicable Requirements Introduction: Applicable Requirements (cont.)(cont.)
State implementation plans (SIP) contain rules adopted by state and approved by EPA. Look for rules in “approved SIP”
New source review (NSR) permits. All past NSR, PSD, state construction permits issued to facility are applicable requirements
10
Introduction: Applicable Requirements Introduction: Applicable Requirements (cont.)(cont.)
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). Apply only to new sources in specific categories that were constructed after the date specified in the rule. Listed in 40 CFR Part 60.
– E.g., Subpart J – Standards for Petroleum Refineries
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs). Pre-1990 standards listed in Part 61. Post-1990 standards listed in Part 63.
– E.g., Subpart CC – MACT for HAPs from Petroleum Refineries
11
Introduction: Applicable Requirements Introduction: Applicable Requirements (cont.)(cont.)
Other applicable requirements– Compliance assurance monitoring (CAM)
– Acid rain rules for “affected” utilities
– Some rules requiring phase-out of ozone-depleting refrigerants
Requirements that are NOT applicable– National ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
12
Why review applicable requirements?Why review applicable requirements?
Sources don’t always know which requirements apply
– In past, overlooked applicable NSPS or NSR requirements
– Have incorrectly suggested units are exempt from CAM
State permits sometimes exclude requirements or include incorrect requirements (e.g., requirements not approved by EPA
Correctly stating requirement necessary to know if additional monitoring required
13
How to Know If a Requirement Is How to Know If a Requirement Is “Applicable?”“Applicable?”
Look for applicability section describing types of units to which rule applies. In NSPS and NESHAPs, usually first section in rule
Often, only certain types of emission units are covered (e.g., “affected facilities”)
Most rules apply to sources in certain categories, (e.g., electric generating units, petroleum refining, municipal waste combustors, other)
14
How to Know If a Requirement Is How to Know If a Requirement Is “Applicable?” (cont.)“Applicable?” (cont.)
NSPS rules apply only after specific dates (e.g.,
constructed or modified after May 4, 1987) Many NESHAP rules apply only to “major” sources in a
specific category (e.g., major source engaged in
petroleum refining)
15
How to DetermineIf a Source Is “Major”
Based on a source’s potential to emit (PTE)– Include all emissions at facility
– Assume plant operates at full capacity, 8760
hours/year, unless restricted by enforceable
operating limit
16
How to Determine If a Source Is “Major” (cont.)
Major source of HAPS has PTE of– 10 tons/year for a single HAP, or– 25 tons/year for any combination of HAPs
Also, any source with a PTE of 100 tons/year of any pollutant is “major”
VOC, NOx and CO have smaller thresholds in certain nonattainment areas
17
Basic Information SourcesBasic Information Sources
Air pollution control training courses on the web– www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/eog/course_format.html
Approved SIP requirements on the web– See each EPA regional website. Region 5’s site
www.epa.gov/region5/air/sips/sips.htm Federal rules (NSPS, NESHAPs)
www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html EPA OAQPS Permits site
www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/permits
18
ReviewingReviewingState Implementation PlansState Implementation Plans
Check that permit term references approved SIP
If permit includes sunset/sunrise clause, check that new rule assures compliance
For more information, see page III-6 and III-7
19
Reviewing New SourceReviewing New SourcePerformance Standards in the PermitPerformance Standards in the Permit
Check cites of NSPS rules Permit should provide enough information to justify
exemptions from an NSPS Permit should address whether unit has been
modified Permit should include correct monitoring
requirements For more information, see page III-11 to III-14
20
Reviewing NESHAPReviewing NESHAPStandardsStandards
Check applicability of potential NESHAPs Permit should provide enough information to justify
exemptions from a NESHAP Permit should address whether unit has been
modified Permit should include correct monitoring
requirements For more information, see page III-15 to III-16
21
Reviewing New Source ReviewReviewing New Source ReviewPermit TermsPermit Terms
Three versions of permits issued by states – Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) in attainment areas
– Major New Source Review (NSR) in nonattainment areas
– State preconstruction permits to all other sources
In some areas, EPA issues PSD permits All NSR permits must be included in Title V permit,
regardless of when NSR permit was issued For details, see p. III-21 to III-27
22
Small-Group Activity – Small-Group Activity – Applicable RequirementsApplicable Requirements
A permit for a pulp mill references the NSPS, Subpart BB for Kraft Pulp Mills
Where would you find this requirement? How would you determine if it applies to the
facility?
23
Practical EnforceabilityPractical Enforceability
Objective: allow inspector to determine compliance
To be practically enforceable, permit terms should– Establish a clear legal obligation for source– Allow compliance to be verified through data
such as records or reports
This is not highly technical! See p. III-45 to III-53
24
Practical Enforceability (cont.)Practical Enforceability (cont.)
Look for– Short-term emission limits (30 days or monthly rolling
averages)– Requirement to keep records and submit reports to
verify compliance with limits on operating hours or throughputs
Examples– “emit less than 49 tons/year on a rolling monthly
average” instead of “annual average of 49 tons/year”– “keep records of monthly throughput” instead of no
record-keeping requirement
25
Monitoring Monitoring
Permit must add monitoring where monitoring in underlying requirement
– Is wholly absent
– Is only a one-time stack test, or
– Does not specify requency
Otherwise, permit cannot add monitoring, even if underlying monitoring could be improved
26
Monitoring (cont.) Monitoring (cont.)
Monitoring is important because
– Often the only way to determine if unit is in compliance or if control device is operating improperly
– Many older requirements have little or no monitoring
– An area in which permitting agency has discretion to improve existing monitoring
27
Monitoring (cont.) Monitoring (cont.)
Examples of requirements that may lack monitoring
– Older NSPS or SIP requirements that require no monitoring or one-time testing
– NSR permits
Where to get ideas on improving monitoring
– For control devices: CAM reference material http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/cam.html
– For uncontrolled units: Title V technical reference document at same website, Region 9 guidelines or state periodic-monitoring guidance documents
28
Cautions when using Region 9 Cautions when using Region 9 Guidelines for Monitoring Guidelines for Monitoring
Do not cite to 1999 EPA Periodic Monitoring Guidance.
Struck down by DC Circuit
Instead, cite state’s periodic monitoring guidance, if
available, or part 70’s periodic monitoring rule [section
70.6(a)(3)(i)(B)].
See p. III-75 to III-87
29
Startup, Shutdown, Startup, Shutdown, Malfunctions (SSMs)Malfunctions (SSMs)
SSM rules exist in SIPs, NSPS and NESHAP rules
Many regulations do not require compliance with emission limit during SSM event
Excess emissions during SSM events can be huge if they occur repeatedly or are allowed to continue unabated
30
Concerns with SSMs Concerns with SSMs
Emissions during upsets and SSM may release toxic and carcinogenic chemicals that community health and safety
Exemptions in regulation and lack of reporting allow upset and SSM emissions to be kept off books and to exceed permit and regulatory limits
Excess emissions due to upsets and SSM are largely avoidable
31
Review of SSMs Review of SSMs
Check plant’s history, look for
– Recurring malfunctions (preventable and foreseeable).
– Reports of SSM events, what caused them, and how long it took to correct problem
If problem exists, request that permit add monitoring of SSM events to ensure malfunctions are caused only by “sudden, unavoidable breakdowns of technology, beyond the control of the owner or operator” and not
– Malfunctions due to human error
– Undersized or poorly maintained control equipment
32
Review of Major Points
How to think about permit review Applicable requirements: SIPs, NSPS,
NESHAPs, NSR permits– How to determine if they apply– How to know if a source is “major”
Practical enforceability Monitoring Startup, shutdown, malfunctions (SSMs)
33
Permit Review: You can Do it!
You decide how technical to make your review – much of it can be non-technical
Many resources are available You don’t need to find and fix all problems Anything you can do to offer constructive
comment is success!
Thank you…
…and good luck!