Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 1
References cited in “Encounters with the InformationSociety”, James Stewart 2002,
AbilityNet (1999). People with Disabilities and ICTs. London, Social Exclusion Unit,Department of Trade and Industry.
Abrahamson, E. and L. Rosenkopf (1997). “Social Network Effects on the Extent ofInnovation Diffusion: A computer simulation.” Organisation Science 8(3, May-
June): 289-309.
Akrich, M. (1992). “The De-Scription of Technical Objects”. In Shaping
Technology/Building Society. W. E. Bijker and J. Law. Cambridge, Mass, MIT
Press: 205-224.
Alba (1987). “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise.” Journal of Consumer Research
13(March 1987): 411-454.
Allen, G. (1996). Kinship and Friendship in Modern Britain. Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
Allen, R. C., Ed. (1995). to be continued: soap operas around the world. London,Routledge.
Anderson, M., J. Tunalay, et al. (2000). Relatively speaking: communication in families.
A report on research undertaken by Newcastle Centre for Family Studies,University of Newcastle upon Tyne on behalf of The BT Forum. London, BT
Future Talk.
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago, Chicago
Argyle, M. (1985) The Social Psychology of Leisure, London, Penguin.
Arnold, E. and K. Guy (1986). Parallel Convergence: National Strategies in InformationTechnology. London., Frances Pinter.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 2
Arnould, E. J. (1989). “Toward a Broadened Theory of Preference Formation and the
Diffusion of Innovations: Cases from Zinder Province, Niger Republic.” Journal ofConsumer Research 16(September): 239-267.
Arnould, E. J. and L. L. Price (1993). “River Magic: Extraordinary Experiences and the
Extended Service Encounter.” Journal of Consumer Research 21(1): 24-45.
Aune, M. (1996). The Computer in Everyday Life: Patterns of Domestication of a New
Technology. in Making technology our own? : domesticating technology into
everyday life. M. Lie and K. H. Sorensen eds. Oslo, Scandinavian UniversityPress.
Bar, F., M. Borrus, et al. (1994). “National Information Infrastructure: A survey of theUS Debate”. In Papers of the Conference, Multimedia, Vision and Reality,
London, Financial Times Conferences.
Barbier, F. and C. B. Lavenir (1996). Histoire des médias de Diderot à Internet. Paris,Armand Colin/Masson.
Barnett, H. G. (1953). Innovation: the basis of cultural change.
Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Paris, Éditions du Seuil.
Bass, F. (1969). “A new product growth model for consumer durables.” Management
Science 15(5): 215-227.
Bates, M. J. and P. Kennedy (1996). “Social Networks: Influence and Information
Concerns for Single Divorces Mothers.” Advances in Consumer Research 23: 440-445.
Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St Louis,
Telos Press.
Bauer, M. (1995). “Resistance to new technology”. In Resistance to new technology :
nuclear power, information technology and bio-technology. M. Bauer (ed).Cambridge, Cambridge University press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 3
Bauer, M., ed. (1995). Resistance to new technology : nuclear power, information
technology and bio-technology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Belk, R., N. Dholakia, et al. (1996). Consumption and Marketing, Macrodimensions.
Cincinnati, South-Western College Publishing.
Belk, R. W. (1988). “Possessions and the Extended Self.” Journal of Consumer Research15 (September): 129-168.
Belk, R. W. (1995). Studies in the New Consumer Behaviour. in Acknowledging
Consumption. D. Miller ed. London, Routledge.
Bell, C. and H. Newby, Eds. (1974). The Sociology of Community. New Sociology
Library. London, Frank Cass and Company Ltd.
Bell, D. (1974). The Coming of the Post Industrial Society. London, Heinemann
Educational Books Ltd.
Berg, A.-J. (1996). Digital Feminism. Senter for teknologi og samfunn. Trondheim,Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitiet: 189.
Berg, A.-J. and M. Aune, Eds. (1993). Domestic Technology and everyday life. COSTA4 workshop. Trondheim, Norway, EC.
Berger, P. and T. Luckmann (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York,
Anchor.
Berry, G. and J. K. Asamen (1993). Children and television: Images in a changing socio-
cultural world. London, Sage.
Bijker, W., T. P. Hughes, et al., Eds. (1987). The Social Construction of Technological
Systems. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Bijker, W. E. and J. Law, Eds. (1992). Shaping Technology Building Society : Studies inSociotechnical change. Inside Technology. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionalism, perspective and method. New Jersey,Prentice Hall.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 4
BMRB (1996). Is IT for All? London, Department of Trade and Industry.
BMRB (1999). Is IT for All? London, Department of Trade and Industry.
Bolton, R., A. Johnson, et al. (1996). The Challenge of the Information Society,
Communication Workers Union, Broadcasting Entertainment Cinematograph and
Theatre Union.
Bott, E. (1955). “Urban Families: Conjugal Roles and Social Networks.” Human
Relations 8: 345-383.
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction : critique sociale du jugement. Paris, Éditions deMinuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction : a social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge,Mass., Harvard University Press.
Bouwman, H. and M. Christoffersen, Eds. (1992). Relaunching Videotex. Dordrecht,
Kluwer Academic Press.
Bouwman, H., M. Christoffersen, et al. (1992). “Videotex in a broader perspective: from
failure to future medium”. in Relaunching Videotex. H. Bouwman and M.Christoffersen eds. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Press.
Brosnan, M. (1998). Technophobia. London, Routledge.
Brown, S. (1995). Postmodern marketing. London ; New York, Routledge.
Brown, S. and D. Turley (1997). Consumer research : postcards from the edge. London ;
New York, Routledge.
Burt, R. (1987). “Social Contagion and Innovation, Cohesion versus Structural
Equivalence.” American Journal of Sociology 92: 1287-335.
Burt, R. (1999). “The Social Capital of Opinion Leaders.” Annals of the AmericanAcademy of Political and Social Science 566(November): 37-54.
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In A Sociology ofMonsters,. J. Law. London, Routledge. Sociology Review Monograph 38.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 5
Campbell, C. (1995). “The Sociology of Consumption”. in Acknowledging
consumption. D. Miller. London, Routledge.
Carey, J. (1996). Winky Dink to Stargazer: Five Decades of Interactive Television.
Presented at i-TV'96: The Superhighway through the Home?, University of
Edinburgh, September 1996.
Carey, J. and M. Elton (1996). Forecasting Demand for New Consumer Services:
Challenges and Alternatives. In New Infortainment Technologies in the Home. R.
R. Dholakia, N. Nundorf and N. Dholakia. Mahwah, New Jersey, LawrenceErlbaum Associates: 35-57.
Carey, K. (1999). Joined up citizenship: ICT and Disabled People. London, PAT 15,Social Exclusion Unit, Department of Trade and Industry.
Castells, M. (1989). The Informational City. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume 1:The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford, Blackwell.
Cestre, G. and R. Darmon (1998). “Assessing consumer preferences in the context ofnew product diffusion.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 15: 123-
135.
Chaney, D. (1996). Lifestyles. London, Routledge.
Charles, N. and M. Kerr (1988). Women, Food and Families. Manchester, Manchester
University Press.
Cliff, A. and Ord J. K. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. London, Pion.
Cliff, A.D.and J.K. Ord (1981). Spatial Processes. London, Pion.
Cheal, D. (1988). The Gift Economy. London, Routledge.
Chisnall, P. M. (1985). Consumer Behaviour. London, McGraw Hill.
Clerc, P.-F. and P. Mallein (1998). CAUTIC, Bordeaux, IREST/ADERA/FranceTelecom.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 6
Cockburn, C. (1992). The Circuit of Technology: gender, identity and power. In
Consuming Technologies: Media and Information technology in Domestic Spaces.R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch eds. London and New York, Routledge.
Cockburn, C. and Fürst-Dilic, Eds. (1994). Bringing Technology Home. Gender and
Technology in a Changing Europe. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
Cockburn, C. and S. Omrod (1993). Gender and technology in the Making. London,
Sage.
Cohen, C., Ed. (1987). Social Change and the Life Course. London, Tavistock.
Coleman, J. (1966). Medical Innovation: A Diffusion study. New York, Bobs Merrill.
Coleman, J., E. Katz, et al. (1957). “The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians.”Sociometry 20: 253-270.
Collinson, S. (1993). “Managing product innovation at Sony: the development of the
Data Discman.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 5(3): 285-306.
Continental Research (1999). Internet Report 1999/2000. London, Continental Research.
Cowan, R. S. (1987). “The consumption junction: a proposal for research strategies inthe sociology of technology”. in The Social Construction of Technological
Systems. W. Bijker, T. P. Hughes and T. Pinch. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Cowen, R. S. (1985). “The Industrial revolution in the home”. in The Social Shaping ofTechnology : How the refrigerator got its hum. D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman
eds. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
Crisell, A. (1997). An Introductory History of British Broadcasting. London, Routledge.
Crow, G. and G. Allan (1994). Community Life, an introduction to local social relations.
Hemel Hempsted, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Csikszentmihayli, M. and E. Rochberg-Halton (1981). The Meaning of Things.
Cambridge, Cambridge.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 7
D'Agostino and D. Tafler, Eds. (1995). Transmissions. Communication and Human
Values. London, Sage.
Dant, T. (1999). Material Culture in the Social World. Open University Press,
Buckingham.
Davies, W. K. D. and D. T. Herbert (1993). Communities within Cities. London,Belhaven Press.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. London, University of California
Press.
De Sola Pool, I., Ed. (1997). The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge MA, MIT
Press.
Deem, R. (1996). Leisure and The Household. All work and no Play?: The Sociology of
Women and Leisure. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
Desjeux, D., S. Taponier, et al. (1997). L'ethno-marketing: une méthode pourcomprendre la construction de la rencontre entre l'offre et le demand. Le cas de la
domotique dans un quatier urbain en France. Conference, Penser les Usages,Arcachon, France Telecom.
Dholakia, R. R., N. Mundorf, et al. (1996). Bringing Infotainment Home: Challenges
and Choices. In New Infotainment Technologies in the Home, demand sideperspectives. R. R. Dholakia, N. Mundorf and N. Dholakia. New Jersey, Lawence
Erlbaum Ass.
Dholakia, R. R., N. Mundorf, et al., Eds. (1996). New Infotainment Technologies in the
Home, demand side perspectives. New Jersey, Lawence Erlbaum Ass.
Dobscha, S. (1998). “The Lived Experience Of Consumer Rebellion AgainstMarketing.” Advances in Consumer Research Volume , 25.
Dosi, G. (1982). “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories.” ResearchPolicy 11(3).
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 8
Douglas, M. (1996). Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. London, SAGE
Publications.
Douglas, M. and B. Isherwood (1979, 1996). The World of Goods : Towards an
Anthropology of Consumption. London, Routledge.
Dunphy, S. and P. A. Herbig (1995). “Acceptance of Innovations: The customer is theKey.” The Journal of High Technology Management 6(2): 193-209.
Dyer, R. (1992). Only Entertainment. London, Routledge.
Elliott, J. (1980). “Marx and Schumpeter on Capitalism’s Creative Destruction: acomparative restatement.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics(August,): 45-68.
Eveland, J. D. (1979). Issues in Using the Concept of 'Adoption of Innovation. AmericanSociety for Public Administration, Baltimore.
Fairchild, C. (1996). “What you want when you want it: altering consumption and
consuming alternatives.” Media, Culture and Society 18: 659-668.
Feenberg, A. (1992). From Information to Communications. Contexts of Computer
Mediated Communication. In M. Lea (ed). New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Festigner, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Stanford University
Press.
Festinger, L., S. Schachter, et al. (1959). Social pressures in informal groups; a study ofhuman factors in housing. London, Tavistock.
Fisher, J D, DePaulo, B M and Nadler A (1981). Extending Alturism beyond altruisticact: the mixed effects of aid to help the recipient, in Rushton, J P and Sorrentino, R
M eds. (1981) Altruism and Helping Behaviour. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
Fisher, J D, Nadler, A and DePaulo, B M, (1983). New Directions in Helping Vol 1Recipient reactions to aid. New York, Academic Press.
Fischer, C. (1988). America Calling: A Social History of the telephone to 1940.Berkeley, University of California Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 9
Fischer, C. S. (1977). Network and places: social relations in the urban setting. New
York, Free Press.
Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding Popular Culture. London, Routledge.
Fleck, J. (1988). Innofusion or diffusation? The nature of technological development in
Robotics. Edinburgh. PICT Working Paper.
Flichy, P. (1995). Dynamics of Modern Communication : The Shaping and Impact of
Communication Technologies. London, SAGE Publications.
Foley, P. (2000). Whose Net? Characteristics of Internet users in the UK, Reportsubmitted to the Information Age and Policy development Communications and
Information Industries Directorate of the Department of Trade and Industry.Leicester, Graduate Business School, de Montfort University/Social Exclusion
Unit, Department of Trade and Industry.
Forty, A. (1986). Objects of Desire: Design and Society since 1750. London, Thamesand Hudson.
Fournier, S. (1991). “Meaning-Based Framework For The Study Of Consumer-ObjectRelations.” Advances in Consumer Research 18: 736-742.
Fournier, S. (1998). “Consumer Resistance: Societal Motivations, Consumer
Manifestations, And Implications In The Marketing Domain, ACR Special SessionSummary.” Advances in Consumer Research 25: 88-90.
Fournier, S. and J. Deighton (1999). Assimilating Innovations. Session at theAssociation of Consumer Researchers Conference 1999, Columbus, Ohio.
Foxall, D. R. (1994). “Consumer initiators: adaptors and innovators.” British Journal of
Management 5(Special): 3-12.
Freeman, C. (1988). “Induced innovation, Diffusion of innovations and Business
cycles”. in Technology and Social Process. B. Elliot. Ed. Edinburgh, EdinburghUniversity Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 10
Frerk, G. and M. Gatzke (1992). New Technologies, Women and Money. NICTs and the
Changing nature of the domestic. GRANITE. Amsterdam, SISWO: 39-56.
Frissen, V. (1994). Domestication of the telephone. In Domestic Technology and
Everyday Life - Mutual Shaping Processes, Proceedings from the COST A4
Workshop October 1993. A.-J. Berg and M. Aune. Brussels, EC. 1: 29-40.
Frissen, V. and Y. Punie (1998). “ICTs and Busy Households”. In Methodologies for
media and information technology research in everyday life EMTEL Working
Paper n. 5. R. Silverstone and M. Hartman eds. Brighton, CULCOM, University ofSussex.
Funk, J. B. and D. D. Buchman (1995). “Video game controversies.” Pediatric Annals24: 91-94.
Gabriel, Y. and T. Lang (1995). The Unmanageable Consumer: Contemporary
Consumption and its Fragmentations. London, Sage.
Galarraga, N. (2001). “Un estudio revela que los niños usan las videoconsolas para
paliar la soledad”. El Pais. Madrid: 32.
Garitaonandia, C., P. Juaristi, et al. (2001). Los niños y los cambios en su entorno
mediático. Bilbao, Universidad del Pais Vasco (UPV).
Gatignon, H. and T. S. Robertson (1985). “A Propositional Inventory for New DiffusionResearch.” 1985 11(March 1985): 849-867.
Gatignon, H. and T. S. Robertson (1991). Innovative Decision Processes. Handbook ofConsumer Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall: 316-348.
Gay, P. d., S. Hall, et al. (1997). Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony
Walkman. London, Sage.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, Mass.,
Houghton Mifflin.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 11
Giddens, A. (1989). “A reply to my critics”. In Social Theory of Modern Societies:
Anthony Giddens and his Critics. D. Held and J. B. Thompson eds. Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern
Age. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Glassier, O. (1998). “Entre conception et usages. Au-delà du Laboratoire: les nouvelle
technologies a l'épreuve de l'usage”. in P. Rossel, M. Bassand and M.-A. Roy.
Lausanne, Presse polytechnique et universitaire romands: 89-110.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, Anchor.
Goodman, I. (1983). “Television's Role in Family Interaction: A Family SystemsPerspective.” Journal of Family Issues(June).
Gottlieb, B. H., Ed. (1981). Social networks and social support. Sage studies in
community mental health. Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage Publications.
Gournay, C. d. and P. A. Mercier (1998). Entre la vie privée et le travail:
décloisonnement et nouveaux partages. In Proceedings of Conference “Penser desUsages”, Bordeaux, IREST/ADERA/France Telecom.
Graham, S. and S. Marvin (1999). Telecommunications and the City. London,
Routledge.
GRANITE, ed. (1992). NICTs and the Changing nature of the domestic. GRANITE.
Amsterdam, SISWO.
Granovetter, M. (1982). “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited”. In
Social Structure and Network Analysis. P. Marsden and N. Lin. Eds. Beverly
Hills, Sage.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). “The strength of weak ties.” American Journal of Sociology
78(May): 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. S. (1995). Getting a job : a study of contacts and careers. Chicago,
University of Chicago Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 12
Granovetter, M. S. and R. Swedberg (1992). The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder,
Westview Press.
Gray, A. (1992). “Turn Your Living Room into a Frontier of Technology: Gender
relations and new technologies in the home”. In NICTs and the Changing nature
of the domestic. GRANITE. Amsterdam, SISWO.
Greenfield, P. M. (1984). Mind and Media - the effects of television, computers and
video games, Fontana.
Haddon, L. and M. Hartman (1997). Internet Literature Review, A Report for NCRFinancial Services for the project, ‘Locating the Virtual Community in the
Households of the future’. Brighton, CULCOM, University of Sussex.
Hall, S. D. H., Andrew Lowe and Paul Willis, Eds. (1980). Culture, Media, Language:
Working Papers in Cultural studies 1972-1979. London.
Harris, K. (2000). Everyone Gets Hooked" exploring ICTs in low-incomeneighbourhoods. London, Social Exclusion Unit, Department of Trade and
Industry.
Hassinger, E. (1959). “Stages in the Adoption Process.” Rural Sociology 24: 52-53.
Hebdidge, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London, Methuen.
Hewstone, M., W. Stroebe, et al., Eds. (1988). Introduction to Social Psychology, AEuropean Perspective. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Hickman, L. (1988). “The Phenomenology of the Quotidian Artifact”. In Technologyand Contemporary Life. P. Durbin. Dordrecht, D. Reidel. Eds. 4: 161-176.
Hilgard, E. R. and R. C. Atkinson (1967). Introduction to Psychology. New York,
Harcourt, Brace and World.
Hill, R. P. (1991). “Homeless Women, Special Possessions, and the Meaning of
"Home": an Ethnographic Case Study.” Journal of Consumer Research18(December): 298-310.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 13
Hirschman, E. (1980). “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking and Consumer Creativity.”
Journal of Consumer Research 7(December): 283-295.
Hirschman, E. (1989). “Consumer Behaviour Theories as Heroic Quest.” Advances in
Consumer Research 16: 639-645.
Hodge, B. and D. Tripp (1986). Children and Television: a Semiotic Approach. Oxford,Basil Blackwell.
Hogg, M. and M. Savolainen (1998). “The Role Of Aversion In Product/Brand Choice.”
Advances in Consumer Research 25.
Holt, D. B. (1995). “How Consumers Consumer: a Typology of Consumption
Practices.” Journal of Consumer Research 22(June): 1-16.
Hossain, S. M. A. (1998). “Agricultural Technology and Development Communication
Networking Patterns in Differentially Developed Villages of Bangladesh.” Journal
of Sustainable Agriculture 12(1): 57-80.
Hughes, T. (1983). Networks of Power, Princeton.
Jackson, S. and S. Moores, Eds. (1995). The Politics of Domestic Consumption.London, Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Jæger, B. and L. Qvortrup (1991). “Community Teleservice Centres - Participatory
Technology Implementation. Danish Experiments”. in Social Constructions ofTechnology. T. Cronberg, P. Duelund and O. M. Jensen eds. Copenhagen, New
Social Science Monographs: 27-41.
Johns, E. A. (1973). The Sociology of Organisational Change. Oxford, Permagon Press.
Johnson Brown, J. and P. H. Reingen (1987). “Social Ties and Word of Mouth Referral
Behaviour.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(December): 350-361.
Kahin, B. and E. Wilson, Eds. (1997). National Information Infrastructure Initiatives,
Vision and Policy Design. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 14
Katz, E. (1973). On the use of the concept of compatibility in research on the diffusion
of innovation. Jerusalem, Israel National Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
Katz, E. and P. F. Lazarsfeld (1955). Personal Influence; the part played by people in the
flow of mass communications. Glencoe, Ill., Free Press.
Katz, J. and P. Aspden (1997). “Motivations for and Barriers to Internet Usage: Resultsof a National Public Opinion Survey”.in Interconnection and the Internet: Selected
Papers from the 1996 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference. G.
Rosston and D. Waterman. Mahwah eds., New Jersey, Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates, Publishers: 347.
Katz, R. L. (1988). The Information Society: an International perspective. New York,Praeger.
Kaufman, C. F., P. M. Lane, et al. (1991). “Exploring more than 24 hours a day: a
preliminary investigation of polychronic time use.” Journal of Consumer Research18(3): 392-401.
Kelly, J. R. (1983). Leisure Identities and interactions. London, Allen and Unwin.
Kling, R. and I. S. (1988). Making a "computer revolution”. in Computerization and
controversy - value conflicts and social choices. D. C. and R. Kling eds. San
Diego, Academic Press.
Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: commoditization as a process. in
The Social Life of Things : Commodities in cultural perspective. A. Appadurai.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kraut, R., R. Fish, et al. (1990). “Informal Communication in Organisation: Form,
Function, and Technology”. in People Reactions to Technology. Oskamp andSpacapan. London, SAGE Publications.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. London, University ofChicago Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 15
Larsen, J. K. and R. Agarwala-Rogers (1977). Re-Invention of Innovation: A study of
community Health Centres. Palo Alto, American Institute for Research in theBehavioural Sciences.
Latour, B. (1987). “The Prince for machines as well as for machinations”. in
Technology and Social Process. B. Elliott. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
Laumann, E. O. (1966). Prestige and association in an urban community; an analysis of
an urban stratification system. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.
Law, J. and J. Hassard, Eds. (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. SociologicalReview. Oxford, Blackwell/Sociological review.
Lawrence, P. R. (1954). “How to overcome resistance to change.” Harvard BusinessReview 32(3): 49-57.
Lazarsfeld, P. and H. Field (1946). The people look at Radio, University of North
Carolina Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1971). Everyday Life in the Modern World. London, Allen Lane.
LeGates, R. T. and F. Stout, Eds. (1996). The City Reader. London, Routledge.
Leung, L. (1998). “Lifestyles and the use of new media in urban China.”
Telecommunications Policy 22(9): 781-790.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. London, Weidenfield and Nicolson.
Levy (1998). Consumers. COTIM, Brussels, University of Rhode Island.
Lie, M. and K. H. Sorensen, Eds. (1997). Making technology our own? : domesticatingtechnology into everyday life. Oslo, Scandinavian University Press.
Lie, M. and K. H. Sorensen (1997). Making technology our own? : domesticating
technology into everyday life. In Making technology our own? : domesticatingtechnology into everyday life. M. Lie and K. H. Sorensen eds. Oslo, Scandinavian
University Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 16
Litwin, H., Ed. (1996). The Social Networks of Older People: a cross-national analysis.
Westport, Praeger.
Livingstone, S. (1992). The Meaning of domestic Technologies. In Consuming
Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic spaces. R. Silverstone and E.
Hirsh eds. London, Routledge.
Livingstone, S. and M. Bovill (1999). Children, Young People and the Changing Media
Environment. London, London School or Economics and Political Science.
Lull, J. (1990). Inside Family Viewing : Ethnographic Research on TelevisionAudiences. London, Routledge.
Lull, J. (1995). Media, Communication, Culture. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.
Lyon, D. (1988). The Information Society. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Lyotard (1984). The Postmodern Condition : a report on knowledge. Manchester,
Manchester University Press.
Maio, M. C. D. (1997). Values as Determinants of consumers Attitudes: The case of
interactive services. Conference, Penser les Usages, Arcachon, France Telecom.
Mauss, M. (1990/1950). The Gift: The Form and Reason for exchange in archaic
societies. London, Routledge.
McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and Consumption: New approaches to the symboliccharacter of consumer goods. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.
McLuhan, m. (1964). Understanding Media. New York.
McQuail, D. (1969). Towards a Sociology of Mass Communications. London., Collier-
Macmillan Publishers.
McQuail, D. (1994). Mass Communication Theory. London, SAGE.
Mediascope (1999). Video Game Violence, Issue Briefs. Studio City, Calif, Mediascope
Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 17
Mediascope (1999). Video Games and their Effects. Issue Briefs Mediascope Press.
Studio City, Calif.
Mick, D. G. and S. Fournier (1995). Technological Consumer Products in Everyday life:
Ownership meaning and satisfaction, Marketing Science Institute.
Mick, D. G. and S. Fournier (1998). “Paradox of Technology: Consumer Cognizance,Emotions and Coping Strategies.” Journal of Consumer Research 25(September):
123-143.
Midgley, D. and G. Dowling (1993). “A Longitudinal Study of Product FormInnovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages.” The
Journal of Consumer Research 19(March 1993): 611-625.
Midgley, D., G. Dowling, et al. (1989). “Consumer types, Social Influence, Information
Search and Choice.” Advances in Consumer Research 16: 137-143.
Midgley, D. f. and G. R. Dowling (1978). “Innovativeness: the Concept and itsmeasurement.” Journal of Consumer Research 4(March): 229-242.
Miles, I., H. Rush, et al. (1988). Information Horizons. Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
Miles, I. and G. Thomas (1996). “User Resistance to new interactive media: participants,
processes and paradigms”. In Resistance to New Technology. M. Bauer ed.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Miller, D. (1987). Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Oxford, Blackwell.
Miller, D., Ed. (1995). Acknowledging Consumption: A Review of New Studies.Material Cultures. London, Routledge.
Molina, A. (1993). Sociotechnical constituencies as a process of alignment: the rise of a
large-scale European information technology initiative. Edinburgh, PICT WorkingPaper: 51.
Monique van Dusseldorp, L. Haddon, et al. (1998). Design for All and ICT businesspractice, Addressing the Barriers, Examples of Best Practice. Brussels, European
Commission DG XIII C5.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 18
Moores, S. (1995). Interpreting Audiences: The Ethnography of Media Consumption.
London, SAGE.
Moores, S. (1996). Satellite Television and everyday life: Articulating Technology.
Luton, University of Luton Press.
Morley, D. (1986). Family Television: cultural power and domestic leisure. London,Comedia.
Morley, D. (1992). Television , Audiences and Cultural Studies. London, Routledge.
Moyal, A. (1992). “The Gendered Use of the Telephone: An Australian Case Study.”Media Culture and Society 14(1): 51-72.
Murdock, G., P. Hartman, et al. (1992). “Contextualizing home computing”. InConsuming Technologies. R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch. London, Routledge: 146-
160.
Nabih, M., S. Bloem, et al. (1997). “Conceptual Issues in the Study of InnovationAdoption Behaviour.” Advances in Consumer Research 24: 190-196.
Nader, A. (1987). “Determinants of help seeking behaviour: the effects of helper'ssimilarity, task centrality and recipients self esteem.” European Journal of Social
Psychology 17: 57-67.
National Statistics (1998). Social Trends 28. London, The Stationary Office.
National Statistics (1999). Survey of Information and Communications Technology in
Schools 1999. London, The Stationary Office.
Naughton, J. (2000). A Brief History of the Future. London.
Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1995). Home and Work. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Norman, D. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things. New York, Doubleday Currency.
Oftel (1999). An international comparison of the cost of using the Internet, London,
Office of Telecommunications (Oftel).
Oftel (2000). Consumers' use of Digital TV, London, Oftel.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 19
Oftel (2000). Consumers’ use of Internet. Summary of Oftel residential survey ,Q1 June
2000. London, Oftel (Office of Telecommunications).
Oliver, R. and J. E. Swan (1989). “Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and
Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach.” Journal of Marketing
53(April): 21-35.
Østby, P. (1993). ‘Escape from Detroit - The Norwegian Conquest of an alien artefact”.
in The Car and its environments. The past, present and future of the motorcar,
Trondheim, European Commission COST A4.
Östlund, B. (1998). Elderly in Action in Front of the Television. in Methodologies for
media and information technology research in everyday life, EMTEL WorkingPaper n. 5, Brighton, CULCOM, University of Sussex.
Otnes, C., T. M. Lowrey, et al. (1997). “Toward an understanding of consumer
ambivalence.” Journal of Consumer Research 24(June 1997): 81-93.
Pakulski (1993). “Mass Social Movements and social Class.” International Sociology
8(2): 131-158.
PAT_15 (1999). Women And Information And Communication Technologies: A
Literature Review. London, PAT 15, Social Exclusion Unit, Department of Trade
and Industry.
PAT_15 (2000). Closing the Digital Divide: Information and Communication
Technology in Deprived Areas. London, PAT 15, Social Exclusion Unit,Department of Trade and Industry.
Perez, C. (1983). “Structural Change and Assimilation of New Technologies in the
Social and Economic System.” Futures Oct.: 11-97.
Pinch, T. and W. Bijker (1987). “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or
How the Sociology or Science and the Sociology of Technology Might BenefitEach Other”. in The Social Construction of Technological Systems. W. Bijker, T.
P. Hughes and T. Pinch eds. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 20
Poster, M. (1990). The Mode of Information. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Prus, R. (1996). Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: intersubjectivity andthe study of human lived experience. Albany, State University of New York Press.
Qvortrup, L. (1992). Telework: visions, definitions, realitites, barriers. Cities and New
Technologies. OECD. Paris, OECD.
Qvortrup, L. (1999). Organisations and Social Complexity: the case of telework. UK-
Nordic Meeting, Virtual Society Project, CRICT, Brunel University.
Reingold, H. (1994). The Virtual Community. London, Minerva.
Renckstorf, K., D. McQuail, et al., Eds. (1996). Media Use as Social Action: A
European Approach to Audience Studies. London, John Libbey.
Rice, R. (1993). “Using network concepts to clarify sources and mechanisms of social
influence”. in Progress in Communication Sciences: Advances in communication
network analysis. W. Richards and G. Barnett. Norwood eds , NJ, Ablex: 43-52.
Rice, R., A. Grant, et al. (1990). “Individual and network influences on the adoption and
perceived outcomes of electronic messaging.” Social Networks 12: 27-55.
Riesman (1955). The Lonely Crowd. New Haven, Yale UP.
Robinson, J. P. and M. Kestnbaum (2000). “Personal Computers, Mass Media and Other
uses of Free Time”. in Social Dimensions of Information Technology: Issues forthe New Millennium. G. D. Gurstein. Hershey/London, Idea Group.
Rogers, E. and F. F. Shoemaker (1971). Communication of Innovations. New York, FreePress.
Rogers, E. M. (1985). “The diffusion of Home Computers among Households in Silicon
Valley.” Marriage and Family Review 8(Personal Computers and the Family): 89-101.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, Free Press.
Rojek, C. (1995). Decentering Leisure. London, SAGE.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 21
Rosenberg, N. (1983). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, V. (1991). “The dynamics of Videotex development in Britain, France and
Germany.” European Journal of Communication 6(2, June).
Schor, J. B. (1998). “Downshifters: Architects of a new American Dream.” Advances inConsumer Research Volume 25.
Schouten, J. W. and J. H. McAlexander (1995). “Subcultures of Consumption: An
ethnography of the New Bikers.” Journal of Consumer Research 22(June): 43-.
Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis. London, Sage.
Seiter, E. (1999). Television and New Media Audiences. Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress.
Shaddock, J. (1999). Information and Communication Technologies for potentially
excluded groups, PAT 15 Target Group, White males from manual backgrounds.London, Social Exclusion Unit, Department of Trade and Industry.
Shampine, A. (1998). “Compensating for information externalities in technologydiffusion models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(May): 337-
346.
Sheth, J. N. (1981). “Psychology of innovation resistance.” Research in Marketing 4:273-282.
Siegel, J., V. Dubrovsky, et al. (1986). “Group Processes in Computer MediatedCommunication.” Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 37:
157-187.
Silverstone, R. (1989). Families, technologies and consumption : the household andinformation and communication technologies. Uxbridge, Middx., Centre for
Research into Innovation Culture and Technology Brunel University.
Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and Everyday Life. London, Routledge.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 22
Silverstone, R. and M. Hartman (1998). Methodologies for media and information
technology research in everyday life. EMTEL Working Paper n. 5. Brighton,CULCOM, University of Sussex.
Silverstone, R., E. Hirsch, et al. (1992). Information and Communications technologies
and the moral economy of the household. in Consuming Technologies: Media andInformation in Domestic spaces. London, Routledge.
Silverstone, R., E. Hirsch, et al. (1990). Listening to a long conversation : an
ethnographic approach to the study of information and communicationtechnologies in the home. Uxbridge, Centre for Research into Innovation Culture
& Technology. Brunel University.
Singh, S. (1996). The Use of Electronic Money in the Home. Melbourne, CIRCIT.
Singh, S. (1999). “Electronic money: Understanding its use to increase the effectiveness
of policy.” Telecommunications Policy 23(10/11).
Singh, S., A. Bow, et al. (1996). The use of information and communication
technologies in the home. Melbourne, CIRCIT.
Sørensen, K. and J. Søgaard (1993). Modernity and Mobility. Towards a Sociology of
Cars. The Car and its environments. The past, present and future of the motorcar,
Trondheim, European Commission COST A4.
Sørensen, K. H. and A.-J. Berg, Eds. (1991). Technologies and Everyday Life:
Trajectories and Transformations, Proceedings from a Workshop in Trondheim,May 28-29 1990, Report No. 5. Oslo, Norwegian Research Council for Science
and the Humanities.
Statt, D. A. (1997). Understanding the Consumer. Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Stern, B. B. (1998). Representing consumers : voices, views, and visions. London ; New
York, Routledge.
Stevens, R., W. Warren, et al. (1989). “Non adopters of Automatic Teller Machines.”
Akron Business and Economic Review 20(3): 55-63.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 23
Stewart, J. (1994). Multimedia and Socio-technical Change: A review of multimedia
and a look at firm behaviour during the configurational stage of a pervasivetechnology. Research Centre for Social Sciences. Edinburgh, University of
Edinburgh.
Stewart, J. (1998). Computers in the Community : Domesticating multimedia into thecity. Edinburgh, Research Centre for Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Stewart, J. (1999). The Web meet the TV : users and the innovation of interactive
television. In Television of the Future – or: The Future of Television? C. Toscanand J. Jensen. Aalborg, Aalborg University Press.
Stewart, J. (2000). “Cafematics: the cybercafe and the community”. In CommunityInformatics. M. Gurstein. Toronto, Idea Group.
Stewart, J. (2000). The Digital Divide in the UK: A Review of Quantitative Indicators
and Public Policies. The Digital Divide, Dresden, University of Dresden.
Stewart, J. (2002). “The Social Consumption of ICTs: Insights from research on the
appropriation and consumption of new ICTs in the domestic environment.”Cognition Technology and Work.
Stewart, J. and R. Williams (1998). “The Coevolution of society and multimedia
technology.” Social Science Computer Review 16(3).
Stone, A. R. (1995). The War of Desire and Technology at the close of the Mechanical
Age. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
Stone, V. and D. Cotton (2000). Social Exclusion: Studies among teenagers and parents
living in poor neighbourhoods, BMRB International.
Stoorgaard, K. and O. M. Jensen (1991). Information technology and Ways of life.Danish Experiments. in Social Constructions of Technology. T. Cronberg, P.
Duelund and O. M. Jensen eds. Copenhagen, New Social Science Monographs.
Sulkunen, P., J. Holmwood, et al., Eds. (1997). Constructing the New Consumer
Society. Basingstoke, Macmillian.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 24
Swan, J. E. and R. L. Oliver (1989). “Postpurchase communications by consumers.”
Journal of Retailing 65(4): 516-533.
Szmigin and Foxall (1998). “Three forms of innovation resistance: the case of retail
payment methods.” Technovation 18(6-7): 459-468.
Thomas, G., T. Vedel, et al. (1992). The United Kingdom, France and Germany: Settingthe Stage. in Relaunching Videotex. H. Bouwman and M. Christoffersen.
Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Press.
Thompson, C. (1998). Living the Texts of Everyday Life. Representing consumers :voices, views, and visions. B. B. Stern. London ; New York, Routledge: 127-155.
Thompson, C. J., H. R. Pollio, et al. (1994). “The Spoken and the Unspoken: AHermeneutic Approach to Understanding the Cultural Viewpoints that Underlie
Consumers' Expressed Meanings.” Journal of Consumer Research 21(December):
432-452.
Turkle, S. (1994). The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York, Simon
& Schuster.
Turkle, S. (1996). Life on the Screen : Identity in the Age of the Internet. London,
Weidenfield and Nicolson.
Umble, D. Z. (1992). The Amish and the telephone. in Consuming Technologies: Mediaand Information in Domestic spaces. R. Silverstone and E. Hirsh. London,
Routledge.
US Administration, C. G. (1993). The National Information Infrastructure: Agenda For
Action, US Government.
Valente, T. W. (1995). Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Cresskill, NewJersey, Hampton Press Inc.
Van Rijn, F. and R. Williams, Eds. (1987). Concerning Home Telematics. IFIP TC 9Conference on Social Implications of Home Interactive Telematics. Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, June 1987, North Holland.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 25
Venkatesh, A. (1996). “Computers and other Interactive Technologies for the Home.”
Communications of the ACM 39(12): 47-54.
Venkatesh, A. (1998). “Cybermarketscapes and consumer freedoms and identities.”
European Journal of Marketing 32(7/8): 664-676.
Venkatraman, M. (1990). “Opinion Leadership, Enduring Involvement andCharacteristics of Opinions leaders: A Moderating or Mediating Relationship.” .
Von Hippel, E. and S. N. Finkelstein (1978). Product designs which encourage - or
discourage - related innovation by users: an analysis of innovation in automatedclinical chemical analyser. Cambridge, MIT, Sloan School of Management.
Von Hippel, E. and S. N. Finkelstein (1979). “Analysis of Innovation in AutomatedClinical Chemistry Analysers.” Science and Public Policy 6: 24-37.
Wakeford, N. (1999). Gender and the landscapes of computing in an internet cafe. in
Virtual geographies: bodies, space and relations. M. Crang, P. Crang and L. Mayeds. London, Routledge.
Wallendorf, M. and E. Arnould (1988). “My Favorite Things: A Cross-Cultural Inquiryinto Object Attachment, Possessiveness, and Social Linkage.” Journal of
Consumer Research 14(March): 531-547.
Walsh, D. A. (1998). Video Game Violence: What Does the Research Say?, NationalInstitute on Media and the Family. 2001.
Wand, B. (1968). “Television Viewing and Family Choice Differences.” Public OpinionQuarterly 32(1): 84-94.
Ward, J. C. and P. H. Reingen (1990). “Sociocognitive Analysis of Group Decision
Making among Consumers.” Journal of Consumer Research 17(December): 245-262.
Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994). Social network analysis : methods and applications.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Webster, F. (1995). Theories of the Information Society. London, Routledge.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 26
Weimann, G. (1982). “On the importance of marginality: one more step into the two-
step flow of communication.” American Sociological Review 47(6): 764-773.
Wellman, B. (1982). Studying Personal Communities. Social Structure and Network
Analysis. P. Marsden and N. Lin. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Wellman, B., P. Carrington, et al. (1988). Networks as personal communities. in SocialStructures: A network approach. B. Wellman and S. Berkowitz. Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B. and D. Tindall (1993). How Telephone Networks connect social networks.Progress in Communication Sciences: Advances in communication network
analysis. Norwood, NJ, Ablex.
Wells, W. (1980). “Do trends in attitudes predict trends in behaviour?” In Attitude
research Enters the 80s. ed R. Olshavsky. Chicago, American Marketing
Association.
Whyte, M. (1954). “Individualism in suburbia.” Confluence 3(3): 317-329.
Wilkes, R. E. (1995). “Household Life-cycle Stages, Transitions and ProductExperiences.” Journal of Consumer Research 22(June 1995): 27-42.
Williams, R. (1990 (first pub. 1975)). Television: Technology and Cultural Forms.
London, Routledge.
Williams, R. (2001). Social Learning in Multimedia. RCSS Report, University of
Edinburgh.
Williams, R. and D. Edge (1996). “The Social Shaping of Technology.” Research Policy
25: 856-899.
Winston, B. (1996). Technologies of seeing : photography, cinematography andtelevision. London, British Film Institute.
Woolgar, S. (1991). “Configuring the User: the Case of Usability Trials”. in ASociology of Monsters. J. Law ed. London, Routledge.
Encounters with the Information Society References
2002 27
Source: http://homepages.ed.ac.uk/jkstew/thesis/