Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
1
Faith Brown NW Zone Silviculturist
Chemult Ranger District Fremont-Winema NFs
December, 2012
Photo #1 by Weaver: In T29S, R11E, Section 15 in the Red Knight area circa 1958. In stand #8921082
Red Knight.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
2
Photo #2 by Brown: T29S, R11E, Section 15; same stand as photo #1 in 2012. Notice growth of small
trees. “The presence of several to many cohorts of small diameter stems represents the single most
dramatic difference between historic and present-day conditions” (Youngblood et al., 2004).
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
3
Introduction
The Red Knight Project area is in the southeast portion of the Chemult Ranger District of the
Fremont-Winema National Forests and south of the Silver Lake Highway (County Road 76). The
legal location is T30S, R11E, Sec 1-12, 14-18; T29S, R11E, Sec 7-36; T29S, R10E Sec 12-14,
23-27, 34-36; T30S, R10E Sec 1-4; 11-12 (Willamette Meridian). The project area has mostly
gently rolling terrain dotted with numerous cinder cones and meandering drainages running
mostly east to west from the northwest flanks of Yamsay Mountain to the broad Williamson
River valley. Riparian systems include Bear Creek fed by Boundary Springs, Trapper Spring and
Still Spring on the east side of the project area; Doeskin Creek, Dillon Creek drain into Jack
Creek (northwest of the Red Knight area); Doe Creek, Knight Creek, Deely Creek and Rock
Creek that drain into the Long Prairie system on the western side of the project area. Jackson
Creek headwaters begin in the crater of Yamsay Mountain and numerous springs on the north
flank of the mountain. There are few meadows in the area with the largest being Long Prairie.
McCarty Flat is a large scab flat (322 acres) on the east boundary of the project area. Elevation
ranges from 6,500 feet in the southeast corner near Yamsay Mt. Semi-Primitive Recreation Area
to 4,600 feet at the Jackson Creek diversion ditch near private property near the southwest corner
of the project area. All of the Red Knight project area is National Forest lands.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
4
Photo 3. McCarty Flat (rocky scabland with sagebrush and forbs) with Yamsay Mountain in the
background.
Jackson Creek is the only perennial stream in the project area. Rock, Deely, Doeskin, Doe, Bear,
Knight and several unnamed tributaries are class IV intermittent or ephemeral streams. Overland
flow occurs during snowmelt in the springtime.
The project area contains portions of five 6th
field stream subwatershed HUCs (hydrologic unit
class) (Lower Jack Creek HUC 180102010403, Lower Rock Creek HUC 171200050105, Bear
Creek HUC 171200050105 (check looks like same number), Long Prairie-Williamson River
HUC 180102010205, and Dillon Creek HUC 180102010402) within the Klamath River Basin
watershed. These sub watersheds are within the Williamson River watershed above Klamath
Marsh, and were designated as an INFISH priority watershed by the Fremont-Winema NFs in
2004.
The Red Knight project area is entirely within the Klamath Tribes’ former reservation lands and
covers approximately 32,262 acres.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
5
History
Fire suppression, selective logging history, even-age forest management and livestock grazing
have had major impacts on the vegetation in the past century. There has been a shift in species
composition from predominantly pure ponderosa pine stands to stands of ponderosa pine with
components of lodgepole pine at lower elevations and riparian stringers and ponderosa stands
with white fir in the higher elevations of the Red Knight area. There has been a shift in structure
from a heterogeneous forest with patches of dense trees, openings and clumps of trees resulting
from frequent fires that created a mosaic across the landscape to a more homogeneous forest
structure with dense understories. There has been a dramatic increase in the numbers of small
trees across the landscape with the suppression of fires. The numbers of plant species (diversity)
and composition has changed in the meadows due to grazing and fire suppression. Bitterbrush
was far less abundant historically than it is today (Busse, et al, 2009) probably due to frequent
fires. There were more grass and forb species (adapted to the frequent fire regime) until the
advent of fire suppression and intense grazing reduced the grasses. Above average precipitation
during the 1880-1920 era allowed bitterbrush and ponderosa pine to become established in
higher densities than during the pre-settlement fire regime. Bitterbrush (sensitive to fire) is more
abundant in the understory today with suppression of fire and managed grazing. Aspen and other
hardwoods and forb species are declining as a result of encroachment of conifers into riparian
and meadow areas and fire suppression. Historically, lodgepole was kept in check by frequent
wildfires and the stands that did develop were of various ages and sizes with a more clumpy
appearance of patches and scattered dog-hair thickets of regeneration. The stands dominated by
lodgepole pine in the lower elevations near Long Prairie experienced a mountain pine beetle
outbreak in the late 1980s. Many of the 7-9 inch diameter lodgepole pine died and were salvaged
through End Result Contracts and large scale firewood units. Much of the area had the large
diameter ponderosa pine selectively harvested after 1945 when it was part of the Klamath Indian
Reservation. In the 1920s and 1930s there was a western pine beetle outbreak in the Klamath
Reservation lands and large ponderosa pine that had beetles were felled and had the bark peeled
and burned to reduce the spread of the beetles (photo 1, Weaver 1931). From 1970-1993 (under
the Winema NF management) approximately 7,000 acres were harvested in the ponderosa pine
and mixed conifer stands mostly selection harvests and some overstory removals (under even-
aged management until about 1990, then uneven aged management direction). Recent past
harvests (since the 1970s) have covered approximately 22% of the Red Knight area. Some
stands had the large overstory ponderosa pine harvested to release the “vigorous white fir
understory.” The faster-growing white fir and lodgepole pine were released and encroached into
the higher elevations and other areas of relatively high moisture with the lack of fire.
Shelterwood and seed tree harvests as well as planting of lodgepole pine and ponderosa pine also
occurred in the Red Knight project area. There has not been any vegetation management activity
in the Red Knight project area since the harvest of Cinder Timber Sale unit #3 in 1993 (using
“clump management” prescription) and its associated 352 acre underburn in 1997. Cinder
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
6
Timber Sale was planned along with three other sales and marked with tree marking paint in the
early 1990s. The paint is still quite visible on trees over approximately 5,000 acres of Chester,
Dillon, Matt and Cinder timber sales. Cinder unit #3 was the only unit harvested. The sales also
had wildlife snag clumps marked (about 5% of unit area) with orange wildlife tags and rock
outcrops were buffered. The southwest quarter section of T30S, R 11 E, section 7 private lands
adjacent to the Red Knight area had mostly overstory removal of the ponderosa pine in late 2010
and there are still large debris piles in the landings visible from the 49 road. From Weaver (1958)
notes indicate that three sections of the Red Knight area (640 acres each) were considered for a
Yamsay Mountain Sustained Yield Unit. Some of these acres have had little harvest activity and
most of the large, old tree structure still exists.
Photo #4: By Weaver. Peeling western pine beetle infested ponderosa pine (1931). It is estimated
that the outbreak killed 2 billion board feet of timber on the Klamath Reservation lands in the
1920s and 1930s.(In contrast approx. 5 billion board feet was harvested between 1913 and 1959.)
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
7
Photo #5. By Weaver. Heavy mature ponderosa pine stand in SW Section 2, T. 30 S., R. 11 E., in
Economic Unit 56 within the proposed Yamsay Mt. Sustained Yield Unit. Economic Unit 56,
comprised of three sections of approximately 640 acres each, averages 30 M ft., BM per acre of
ponderosa pine. Sept. 1958.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
8
The natural channel for Jackson Creek was restored in 1996 by placing boulders to act as vortex
weirs in the old diversion channel. The boulder plug failed and was overtopped during a
snowmelt event in 1998. A new channel was constructed 75 feet upstream from the existing
diversion point with a backhoe and “fuzzy dams” (felled trees with tops and limbs attached
pointing upstream) were placed in the diversion channel. The creek now runs in its natural
channel. The culvert at the Jackson Creek crossing of the 49 road was replaced in the late 1990s.
The Boundary Spring spring box, trough and wooden tank were developed in the early 1970s for
the sheep allotment and for a fire suppression water source. The Boundary Spring area is an
important camping and hunting spot for Klamath Tribal members historically and to the present
day.
Recreation in the area historically was mostly hunting, trapping and fishing (Jackson Creek).
Historically, families from the Klamath Tribes lived and camped near Jackson Creek all summer
long. There is an historic hunting cabin (Knight’s Cabin, est. 1938) near Knight Creek in the
southeast portion of the Red Knight area. There is another historic hunting cabin on Jackson
Creek on the 4973-130 road. There are numerous dispersed hunting camps in the area. Jackson
Creek Campground was constructed in the early 1970s and the Jackson Creek guard station
housed fire crews historically. The guard station now is used by hunters during hunting season.
Small diameter trees (less than 6” DBH) were thinned to reduce competition on large, old
ponderosa pines in Jackson Creek Campground in April, 1999 with guidance from the
silviculturist and others from Chemult District with on-site consultation with the Klamath Tribes
representative on what and where to thin in the campground. The Alla Mage Ski club (Klamath
Falls) developed cross country ski trails in the area with the hub being the guard station in the
early 1990s. The club has since disbanded and the trails are not maintained or used by the public.
Most of the trails are on existing roads marked with blue diamonds and directional signs at road
intersections.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
9
Photo #6. By Weaver. Knight’s Cabin, 1958 (built in 1938).
Regulatory Framework
The Red Knight Restoration Project was designed to move towards the desired future condition
described in the Winema LRMP (Land and Resource Management Plan) as amended 1990 and
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
10
will follow the standards and guidelines for the different management areas within the project
area (See Table 1). Numerous laws govern the management and restoration of National Forest
lands (listed at Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2020.11, p.3-7) including The Organic Act,
Knutson-Vandenberg Act, Sikes Act, Multiple-Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960, National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to name a few. FSM 2000-National Forest Resource
Management Chapter 2020 – Ecological Restoration and Resilience provides foundational policy
for using ecological restoration to manage National Forest System lands in a sustainable manner.
Chapter 2020 lists objectives including healthy, resilient landscapes with greater capacity to
survive natural disturbances and large scale threats to sustainability, especially under changing
and uncertain future environmental conditions such as those driven by climate change and
increasing human uses. The guidance in FSM 2020 includes developing goals and objectives
within the framework defined by laws, Indian treaties and regulations, collaboratively developed
public and Indian tribal values and desires, historical conditions, current and likely future
ecological capabilities, a range of climate change projections, the best available scientific
information and technical and economic feasibility to achieve desired conditions (FSM 1905).
Table 1 – Winema Land Resource Management Plan management areas goals, desired
conditions, approximate acres within the Red Knight project area, and approximate
percent of the project area.
Management
Area (MA)
Winema Land Resource Management Plan Goals and Desired
Conditions Acres % of
Area
MA-2
Developed
Recreation
Jackson Creek
Campground
(Winema
LRMP 4-94)
Goal- Provide variety of recreation opportunities & development levels at
developed recreation sites. Emphasis is to meet demand for developed
camping, except on holiday weekends. Desired Condition- developed
recreation occurring in a natural-appearing forest environment. A variety
of recreation activities are supported by the appropriate facilities. These
include picnicking, camping, boating, swimming, hiking, riding, cross-
country skiing, and snowmobiling. Developed recreation areas are
generally accessible by passenger car.
58 0.2
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
11
Management
Area (MA)
Winema Land Resource Management Plan Goals and Desired
Conditions Acres % of
Area
MA-3B
Scenic
Management,
Foreground
Partial
Retention
(Winema
LRMP 4-107)
Goal- Provide attractive scenery that is slightly altered from a natural
condition as viewed in the foreground. Activities may repeat or introduce
form, line, color, or texture common or uncommon to characteristic
landscape, but changes in their qualities of size, amount, intensity,
direction, and pattern must be visually subordinate to the visual strength
of the characteristic landscape. Desired Condition- the same as the area
wide condition with large tree character emphasized and maintained
perpetually in the foreground in all species, except lodgepole pine,
through retaining large-diameter trees in groupings and by having large
trees sometimes scattered individually among other tree size classes. To
achieve diversity, small openings with natural-appearing edges may be
created. Overall, trees with distinctive bark and tree form characteristics,
including occasional character snags, are very evident. Management
activities may be noticeable, but they remain subordinate to the natural
landscape character. An interdisciplinary team desired condition is to not
have landings or slash piles located within sight of main travelways.
1,358 4.2
MA-7
Old Growth
Ecosystems
(Winema
LRMP 4-128
and
Amendment
#3)
Goal- Provide, maintain, and enhance existing mature and old-growth
communities that are needed to meet the management requirements for
associated wildlife species, for mature successional stage diversity,
preservation of natural gene pools, aesthetic qualities, and to maintain the
inherent values of these ecosystems. Desired Condition- old-growth
environments of mature and overmature communities of lodgepole pine,
ponderosa pine, mixed conifer, ponderosa pine and associated species,
and mountain hemlock/subalpine fir, as well as stands of cottonwood or
aspen. Timber management techniques may be used to enhance low
quality stands to greater potential.
6,313 19.6
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
12
Management
Area (MA)
Winema Land Resource Management Plan Goals and Desired
Conditions Acres % of
Area
MA-8
Riparian
Areas
(Winema
LRMP 4-136)
Goal- to protect soil, water, wetland, floodplain, wildlife, and fish
resource values associated with riparian vegetative communities and
adjacent drier ecosystems. Management emphasis is on water quality,
deer fawning, wildlife habitat, and aquatic ecosystems. Existing
conditions will be maintained or enhanced. Desired Condition- riparian
vegetative communities containing openings and meadows interspersed
with stands in various successional stages. These stands differ in age,
species composition, density, and size. Riparian vegetation provides
wildlife habitat and adequately protects floodplains, bank stability, and
water quality. Few roads and other facilities are present within the
riparian area. Timber harvest shall be programmed outside of 100 foot
buffers of class 1 streams
1,656 5.1
MA-12
Timber
Production
(Winema
LRMP 4-153)
Goal- Produce a high level of growth and timber production with
considerations for economic efficiency and resource protection.
Screening direction is to manage for restoration of late or older seral
stages. Desired Condition- a mosaic of healthy sands capable of
sustaining high levels of timber production. Such stands typically are
comprised of trees that are growing rapidly and have well-developed
crown ratios and low levels of mortality. Timber harvest shall be
programmed.
22,648 70.1
MA-15
Upper
Williamson
(Winema
LRMP 4-160)
Goal- Provide a natural-appearing forest setting for dispersed recreation
activities and special wildlife habitats. Desired Condition- a slightly
altered forest environment, including a mix of native coniferous and
deciduous trees and shrubs There is a generally uniform appearing
forested environment with a variety of age classes throughout the
ponderosa pine working group. Cutting units will dominate in the
lodgepole pine working group. Timber harvest shall be programmed.
272 0.8
Total 32,305 100
HRV
The Regional Forester’s Eastside Forest Plan Amendment amended the Winema LRMP in 1998.
Part of the amendment requires characterizing the proposed timber sale and its associated
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
13
watershed for patterns of stand structure by biophysical environment and comparing it to the
Historic Range of Variability (HRV). It goes on to say the HRV should be based on conditions in
the pre-settlement era and should be developed for large landscapes across which forest types,
environmental settings and disturbance regimes are relatively uniform. Late, Old Structure
(LOS) a term used in the wildlife standard refers to the structural stages where large trees are
common (Multi-stratum with Large Trees and Single-stratum with Large Trees.). For the HRV
analysis for Red Knight LOS refers to the old-growth definitions from Hopkins, 1993
(appendix***). The landscape boundary used is the Red Knight project area since it is large
enough (32,000+ acres), forest types, environmental settings and disturbance regimes are
relatively uniform. The FSM 2000 Chapter 2020 broadens the definition of ecological restoration
beyond the goal of reestablishing resource conditions that existed some time in the past (HRV).
The Forest Service definition of ecological restoration focuses on reestablishing the resilience or
adaptive capacity of ecosystems. Historical conditions are essential to understanding ecosystem
dynamics considering the uncertainties of climate change and have great value in helping
develop restoration goals and objectives. Historical vegetation information from The Interior
Columbia Basin Ecosystem Project Scientific Assessment (ICBEMP, Quigley and Arbelbide,
1997) and Hagmann’s interpretation of 1920 forest inventory by the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(Hagmann, unpublished data, 2012, BIA) was used to determine the HRV for the Red Knight
area. Ecosystems within their HRV are assumed to be more resilient to widespread disturbances
and sustainable over time. Resilience to fire, insects and disease is important so that disturbance
events do not lead to uncharacteristic large-scale loss of forest habitat. Creating a resilient forest
allows for the development and maintenance of diverse wildlife habitats closer to what occurred
historically. The concept of historic reference provides a range of natural variability in
composition and structure in ponderosa pine ecosystems, a point of reference to evaluate
departures within the ecosystem and criteria for measuring success of restoration treatments
(Youngblood et al., 2004).
Insert HRV map with current seral stages in Red Knight
Table 2. Current and Historical Range of Variation by Physiognomic Type in Red Knight*
Physiognomic Type – Dry
Forest
Historical Range* Current**
Early-Seral 6-10% 10%
Mid-Seral 14-35% 37%
Late-Seral Multi-Layer 12-15% 53%
Late-Seral Single-Layer 39-65% <1%
*From ICBEMP current and historic period physiognomic types for the dry forest vegetation
group for Upper Klamath Ecological reporting Unit (ERU) table 3.118 ; p. 659.
**Current percentages are from timber stand exams (1991-1993) and existing conditions field
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
14
interpretations (Brown, 2010). All plant groups were combined to compare to data from
ICBEMP.
Table 3. Old Forest Multi and Single Stratum by Biophysical Environment
Successional Stage Comparisons
Biophysical Environments
Late Single Stratum
Late Multi-Stratum
H% C% %D H% C% %D
Dry Ponderosa 70-90 <1 -70 4-6 53 +49
Dry Lodgepole 5-16 <1 -4 2-5 16 +14
Dry Mixed Conifer
0-2 <1 0 2-4 60 +58
H=Historic, C=Current, D=Difference
The intent of the wildlife screen is to maintain options in the short term for conservation of
wildlife species associated with late/old successional (LOS) habitat. The wildlife screen provides
guidelines in two scenarios depending on results of the ecosystem screen. The following table
displays the current status (below, within, or above HRV) of biophysical environments.
HRV Categories by Late/Old Stages
Biophysical Environments Single Stratum with large trees Multi-Stratum with large
trees
Dry Ponderosa Pine below HRV above HRV
Dry Lodgepole Pine below HRV above HRV
Dry Mixed Conifer within HRV above HRV
Scenario 3a is used if the abundance of late successional stages in a biophysical environment is
below historic levels. With Scenario 3a, if either one or both of the late stages is below HRV
there should be no net loss of LOS from that biophysical environment. One type of late stage
can be manipulated to move stands into a late stage that is deficit.
Scenario 3b is used if the abundance of LOS falls within or above historic levels. Scenario 3b
allows harvest within late stage stands if guidelines are followed and harvest does not cause late
stages to fall below HRV. All biophysical environments are above HRV for multi-stratum with
large trees. The ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine plant groups are below HRV for single
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
15
canopy with large trees and the dry mixed conifer is within HRV for single stratum with large
trees.
Proposed activities would move ponderosa pine, lodgepole pine and mixed conifer stands from
multi-stratum toward structural stages and conditions that occurred historically (single-stratum).
Stands with a large component of older trees would closely resemble more open, clumpy
conditions dominated by large, old trees that were prevalent historically.
Need to insert FRCC discussion with biophysical environments matrix*****discussion about
fire regime condition class and how it is highly departed from the historical – hence the need to
move the stands towards more resilient, historical conditions.
Table 2. Red Knight BioPhysical environments matrix
Biophysical
Environment
Dominant
Disturbance
Factors
Disturbance
Regime
Average
Disturbance
Patch
Typical
Landform
Setting
Typical
Elevation
Range
Typical
Aspects
Warm, Dry
Ponderosa
Pine
Fire, Insects
Disease
(including
bark beetles,
dwarf
mistletoe
and Pandora
moth)
Low
intensity,
frequent fire
Also mixed
1-5 acres Flat, side
slopes,
ridges
Below
5,000 feet
Flat
Warm, Dry
Lodgepole
Pine
Insects,
(bark
beetles),
Disease, Fire
Moderate 5-15 acres Flat, cold
air
drainages
5,000 feet Flat,
concave
depressions
Warm, Dry
Mixed
conifer
Insects,
disease, fire
Mixed (low
and
moderate)
5-30 acres Ridges,
side slopes
5-6,000
feet
North,
West, Flat
The low severity/low intensity fire regimes typically had large fires but small patch sizes (Table
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
16
2). Fires burned frequently and regularly consuming fuels, killing small trees, and pruning the
boles of the residual trees and maintained a relatively fire-resistant landscape. Forests with
ponderosa pine had very small patch sizes (.02-.35 ha) due to group kill of pines by bark beetles
or root disease pockets and subsequent consumption of the debris by fire. Most of the forest was
a fairly uniform mosaic of mature tree clusters and grassy understories. As individual tree
clumps became less vigorous, they would be attacked by bark beetles, creating a patch of coarse
woody debris. The landscape was dotted with regenerating patches and clusters of coarse woody
debris (Agee, 2002).
Mixed severity fires had larger patch sizes (2.5- 250 ha) and edges. These fires maintained a
naturally fragmented forest structure and fuel structure.
Direction
Proposed action for the Red Knight area would also follow recommendations from the Fremont-
Winema National Forest (FWNF) for forest treatment priority from health risk analysis
(Krommes, 6/2010), borax application manual direction (Krommes, 2012). Red Knight area is
within the Williamson River watershed above the Klamath Marsh – a priority watershed for
treatment on the FWNF. Red Knight proposed action would follow 2012 emphasis areas for the
FWNF:
promoting resiliency of forested landscaped in the face of climate change by
planning and implementing fuels and vegetation projects that reduce hazardous
fuels accumulation,
thin stands of overstocked and diseased trees and remove less resilient tree
species;
Manage vegetation to restore and sustain relatively rare habitat components such
as old growth and aspen;
promote projects that remove barriers to fish passage and take actions to restore
meadows and riparian areas;
focus on restoration and sustainability of rangelands/meadow/riparian areas;
provide sustainable forest products such as timber, forage, firewood, mushrooms,
cones and boughs within the capability of the land as a consequence of land and
watershed restoration efforts;
continue to honor our government to government relationship with the Klamath
Tribes and consult with them regarding activities, programs and decisions that
have the potential to affect treaty resources, cultural values and the exercise of
treaty rights., (RFs letter 3/20/2012 emphasizing describing outcomes and not
how to accomplish)
Collaboration
Following the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Klamath Tribes (as amended
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
17
2005) and the US Forest Service the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) collaborated with the Tribal
natural resource department in the development of the Red Knight restoration project. A
proposed action for the Red Knight area was developed with participation of the Klamath Tribes’
forester, the Red Knight IDT and the public through scoping. Later, modification to the proposal
for treatments in the Red Knight area was developed using a collaborative process involving the
Klamath Tribes and their representatives Debbie and Dr. Norm Johnson, Dr. Jerry Franklin,
Keala Hagmann and Derek Churchill. Over several months, field trips, e-mails, phone
conversations and meetings were held with collaborators (including Oregon Wild and American
Forest Resources Counsel and concerned publics) to discuss the existing conditions of the project
area, scientific principles and new concepts for managing the area. Many topics were discussed
and the proposed action was developed utilizing the recommendations from the collaboration.
One purpose for entering the Red Knight project area is to restore the forest landscape to more
resilient historic conditions. Key principles for restoration management in the Red Knight area
are consistent with “A Plan for the Klamath Tribes’ Management of the Klamath Reservation
Forest” (Johnson, et al, 2008); The Case for Active Management of Dry Forest Types in Eastern
Washington: Perpetuating and Creating Old Forest Structures and Functions (Franklin, et al,
2008); Dry Forest Restoration Principles and Prescriptions (Franklin and Johnson, 2011); A
Restoration Framework for Federal Forests in the Pacific Northwest (Franklin and Johnson, J of
F, 12/2012) and Okanagan Wenatchee Forest Restoration Strategy, 2012
(http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5340103.pdf). A field trip with
interested publics was conducted on July 3, 2012 to the Red Knight project area where many of
the scientific principles and concepts for managing the area were discussed including timber
harvest possibly not generating enough revenue to conduct the whole suite of proposed
restoration activities.
Current forest structure and composition
The existing condition of the vegetation was determined from timber stand exams (1991-1993),
field reconnaissance (2010-2012), interpretations of satellite imagery (remote sensing and GNN
(greatest nearest neighbor) models) and LANDFIRE (structural and FRCC) data. The LOS (late,
old structural stage) definitions used for the Red Knight area are the “old-growth” definitions
from Region 6 Interim Old-Growth Definitions (Hopkins et al., 1993) of various plant groups.
There are three major plant association groups in the Red Knight area including dry lodgepole
pine (approximately 4,342 acres), dry ponderosa pine (approximately 24,178 acres) and dry
mixed conifer about 3,046 acres). For this assessment, plant associations where ponderosa pine
would be the major climax species with low intensity, frequent fire disturbances (fire climax) are
referred to as the ponderosa pine type (Franklin and Dyrness, 1988). Plant associations with a
combination of ponderosa pine, white fir, sugar pine and western white pine as climax species
are referred to as mixed conifer types. Plant associations with lodgepole pine as the major climax
species are referred to as the lodgepole pine type. Meadows include McCarty Flat as a scab flat
formation, Long Prairie and scattered smaller meadows mostly being encroached by lodgepole
pine and other conifers with fire suppression. There are nine cinder pits in the Red Knight project
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
18
area.
Table 3. Plant Associations grouped by forest type
Forest Type Plant Associations Acres % of Red Knight
Ponderosa
Pine
CPS211, CPS212 24,178 75%
Lodgepole
Pine
CLM211, CLS211, CLS212,
CLS311
4,341 13%
Mixed Conifer CWS112 3,046 9%
Meadow MW, MD(includes McCarty
Flat)
702 2%
Non-forest cinder pits, rocks 35 <1%
(Plant associations from Plant Associations of the Central Oregon Pumice Zone, Volland and
Hopkins, 1988)
Lodgepole Pine – (Pinus contorta var. murryana)
Lodgepole pine is well established near meadows and wet riparian stringers throughout the Red
Knight area and is interspersed in the ponderosa pine plant associations with the lack of fire. The
extensive stands of lodgepole pine are a “biological anomaly” (Hopkins, 1993) because frequent
fires would have confined the fire-sensitive lodgepole to the riparian stringers and created a more
clumpy appearance of variously aged and sized trees. The stands dominated by lodgepole pine
are mostly in the lower elevations of the area near Long Prairie. With its characteristic prolific
seeding and high seed viability, lodgepole pine has established itself as a component of most of
the plant associations and greatly increased the stand densities in the area. The recent mountain
pine beetle outbreak has affected most of the project area including clumps of lodgepole pine
near the base of Yamsay Mountain. The lodgepole pine stands in the western part of the project
area and on Yamsay Mountain (outside the project area) are experiencing another outbreak of
mountain pine beetle as are the stands with clumps of lodgepole pine near the base of Yamsay
Mountain. (see map ***). Mountain pine beetles are attacking ponderosa pine and other five
needle pines in the area at the present time (Krommes, Eglitis 2010). Dwarf mistletoe, mountain
pine beetle, comandra blister rust, western gall rust and root rots are the most common diseases
and insects that are influencing the growth and health of the lodgepole pine stands in the area.
There are many standing dead and down lodgepole pine in stands that have nine inch and larger
diameter lodgepole pine from the most recent mountain pine beetle outbreak. Shrubs include
bitter bush, squirrel tail, Ross’ sedge, western needlegrass and in higher elevations manzanita.
Site productivity ranges from very low to moderately high.
Ponderosa Pine – (Pinus ponderosa var. ponderosa)
Ponderosa pine stands in the area are predominantly multi-story with dense mid and understories
of ponderosa pine, lodgepole pine and in the higher elevations; white fir. There are many stands
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
19
with large (>21” DBH), old ponderosa pine that are competing for water, nutrients and growing
space with the other large, old and mid and understory smaller diameter trees. Red Knight has
very similar conditions to many areas on the Fremont-Winema NFs (and former Klamath Tribes’
reservation lands) including the Black Hills, Modoc, Fort and BlueJay project areas. Mortality of
the large trees (snags) is higher now than it was historically throughout the ponderosa pine,
mixed conifer and lodgepole pine dry forest types (Brown, Simpson; personal observations
1989-2012 and wildlife report, 2012). The current forest condition is characterized by vegetative
composition, structure and spatial pattern that have moved away from the historic conditions.
The forest is much more homogeneous in spatial pattern (dense all over), has multi-storied
structure (less single-story), with more shade-tolerant and fire intolerant species (white fir,
lodgepole pine) in the stands. Mountain pine beetle is attacking even the larger diameter
ponderosa pine in the area. The competition between the trees is reducing growth and vigor in
the conifers resulting in high levels of stress making the trees more susceptible to insects and
disease. Dwarf mistletoe is widespread in most of the ponderosa pine stands. Brush species
including bitterbrush, manzanita and snowbrush are decadent with a large component of dead
stems. Needle drape in the bitterbrush from the overstory conifers adds to the ladder fuels. Other
plants include western needlegrass, squirrel tail, ross’ sedge and Idaho fescue.
Mixed conifer –
In the higher elevations and on north aspects where there is a little more available moisture are
dry mixed conifer stands with ponderosa pine, white fir (Abies concolor), sugar pine (Pinus
lambertiana), western white pine ( Pinus monticula) and lodgepole pine. These stands are
densely stocked and have clumps of down and dead wood from root rots and insect attacks on
the conifers. Fir engraver has caused mortality in all sizes of white fir and left many dead tops in
the white fir. Mountain pine beetles have successfully attacked the lodgepole pine, sugar pine,
western white pine in the mixed conifer stands. Annosus root disease and Armillaria root disease
is present and is causing tree mortality and growth loss. Indian paint fungus (Echinodontium
tinctorium), ET, is a fungus that attacks true firs. It is the most common heart rot of true firs in
the Red Knight area and has a distinctive hoof shaped conk on the bole of infected trees. White
pine blister rust has infected and killed many of the five needle pines in the area. Understory
plants include snowbrush, greenleaf manzanita, bitterbrush, needlegrass, squaw carpet and
prince’s pine. The southeast portion of the Red Knight area near the Yamsay Mountain Semi
Primitive Recreation Area and in the upper reaches of the Jackson Creek drainage is where most
of the mixed conifer stands are located.
Meadows and riparian systems – (See riparian report, Terry)
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
20
EUI discussion and riparian habitat conservation areas.
Interruption of the natural fire regime, changes in grazing pressure and favorable weather and
seed crop have resulted in dense regeneration of conifers throughout the Red Knight area.
Desired Future Condition
The desired future condition resembles the historic conditions of a forest maintained by frequent
low-intensity fires with an abundance of fire-resistant large, single storied ponderosa pine
stands.in the lower elevations grading into mixed conifer stands in the higher elevations still
dominated by ponderosa pine. The lodgepole pine stands would be less susceptible to mountain
pine beetles with increased vigor and lower densities. The desired condition is more
heterogeneous spatial distribution with clumps of old trees, openings and individual trees
interspersed with dense, untreated clumps of trees. Overall stand densities would resemble
historic lower densities that were more resistant to insects, disease and wildfire. The riparian
areas would have more diversity of hardwood species including aspen and willow; the forbs and
grasses would thrive without competition from conifer encroachment. Riparian zones would
provide diversity and productivity of native plant communities and the amount and distribution
of large woody debris characteristic of the natural riparian ecosystems. Big game forage
including bitterbrush would be abundant and vigorous.
Recommendations From Big Bill Watershed Analysis (see Modoc Silviculture Report page 8-9)
From ICBMP1.3.1 - Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project (ICBEMP)
Several trends and opportunities fitting conditions in the Red Knight area were identified in
ICBEMP.
The composition, structure, and disturbance patterns in dry forests have changed
significantly.
The old single story stage of ponderosa pine is at 25 percent or less than its historical amount.
Overall, stand structures have changed from open, park-like stands of large trees with clumps
of small trees to dense overstocked young stands with several canopy layers.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
21
In the Upper Klamath Ecological Reporting Unit (ERU), ponderosa pine old forest multi-
story structure increased by 88 percent. 1
The dense mid-seral structures of the dry forest have high risks for crown and intense fire
events. Total available fuel has generally increased everywhere in dry forests.
Trends from Integrated Scientific Assessment:
Habitat conditions for nearly all species were found to be more favorable historically.
Species that are likely in decline are associated with habitat components that are declining,
specifically old forest structures.
The threat of severe lethal fires has increased by nearly 20 percent, predominantly in the dry
and moist forest types.
From LRMP –FP as amended by the “Eastside Screens”. The intent of the screens is to maintain
options in the short term for conservation of wildlife species associated with late/old forest
habitat. See Table 1 above for desired conditions for each MA. Timber management techniques may
be used to enhance low quality stands to greater potential. The general forest area MA 12 desired future
condition is a mosaic of healthy sands capable of sustaining high levels of timber production.
From “A plan for the Klamath Tribes’ Management of the Klamath Reservation Forest” Johnson
et al., 2008 (KTP, p. 37-42) – “The long term management goal should be to restore and
maintain structurally complex stands dominated by ponderosa pine across the ponderosa pine
and mixed-conifer habitat types. Complex ponderosa pine-dominated forest can be accomplished
through carefully designed silvicultural treatments using tree removal and prescribed fire … All
harvests would be in the form of partial cuts with the objective of reducing overall stand
densities as well as restoring spatial heterogeneity within the stand. General objectives: Reduced
basal areas in overstocked stands; increase of the mean diameter of stands; shift in composition
toward more fire and drought tolerant species such as ponderosa pine, sugar pine; restoration of
historical levels of spatial heterogeneity; protection of existing old-growth and provide for
restoration and maintenance of historic old growth population levels by management of younger
stand components. As described in the KTP (2008) desired future stand conditions for the
ponderosa pine forest type include large diameter trees (greater than 21” DBH) comprising 75%
of the basal area with basal area levels for the drier end of the range from 50-70 square feet to
120-140 square feet on the moistest and most productive forest types. Structural goals (pg. 17 of
the KTP) for the complex ponderosa pine/bitterbrush types (most of the lower elevations in Red
Knight) include 12-15 trees per acre over 21” DBH and 60 square feet of basal area and 2-4 trees
at least 25 square feet of trees over 32” DBH. The mixed-conifer forest types (the higher
elevations in Red Knight) would have a higher density and larger numbers of big trees with 15
1 ERU- A geographical mapping unit developed to report information on the description of biophysical environments, the
characterization of ecological processes, the discussion of past management practices and their effects, and the identification of
landscape management opportunities.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
22
trees per acre and 70 square feet of basal area over 21” DBH. There would also be 30 square feet
of trees larger than 32” DBH and include sugar pine, white fir. A relatively small number of
large snags (less than two per acre) would occur. The smaller trees would occur in clumps or
patches randomly distributed across the forest with 20-30 square feet of basal area per acre with
some denser patches maintained for hiding cover. (Table 5, pg. 19, KTP). The shrub layer
(mostly bitterbrush) will be patchily distributed as a result of periodic prescribed fire in the
ponderosa pine types. Snowbrush and manzanita will continue to occupy the shrub layer in the
mixed-conifer (higher elevations) forest types. These are targets to shoot for, not necessarily to
meet in the first entry into the forest stands. Maintaining most of the old, large trees and thinning
the smaller diameter trees and introducing prescribed fire in the ponderosa pine/bitterbrush forest
types will move the Red Knight area closer to the desired future conditions described above.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
23
Photo #7. Sheep grazing on Long Prairie June, 2011. Notice the lodgepole pine saplings encroaching on
the edge of the meadow. In early spring the sheep are kicking up dust in the dry meadow.
Need for Proposal
The difference between the existing condition and the desired future condition expresses the
following underlying needs within the Red Knight project area:
1. There is a need to amend the Winema LRMP in order to cut and remove white fir larger than
21 inches in ponderosa pine stands to restore single canopy late and old structural stages.
Historic range of variability analysis (Brown, 2012) indicates that the ponderosa pine, mixed
conifer, and lodgepole biophysical types are below the historic range of variability for single
canopy late and old structural stages. Winema LRMP standards and guidelines for the
eastside screens (Revised Continuation of Interim Management Direction Establishing
Riparian, Ecosystem, and Wildlife Standards for Timber Sales, 1995) would not allow the
cutting of green white fir trees larger than 21 inches. To accomplish the desired stand
composition in restoring the ponderosa pine single canopy late and old structural stages to the
landscape, there is a need to amend the Winema LRMP in order to cut and remove white fir
larger than 21 inches.
Lodgepole pine
encroachment into
meadow
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
24
2. There is a need to amend the Winema LRMP in order to underburn, broadcast burn, or
jackpot burn management area 3B, scenic management, foreground partial retention , with
evidence of charred bark for greater than three years after the work has been completed
(Winema LRMP, 4-107). Also in this management area there is a need for visually appealing
scenery that represents the landscape character of the forest along the Silver Lake Highway.
In order to accomplish desired stand composition along the Silver Lake Highway, it is
necessary to follow up vegetative treatments with a combination of underburning, broadcast
burning, and jackpot burning to treat slash left after vegetation treatments in MA 3 - Scenic
Management along the Silver Lake Highway. Doing so would scorch and leave charred bark
on a portion of trees and would remain evident for longer than three years. There is a need to
amend the Winema LRMP to exempt this action from Scenic standard 1 for Management
Area 3B, Winema LRMP page 4-107.
3. There is a need to restore, enhance, and maintain a healthy forest habitat by developing
spatial patterns, forest composition, structure, and ecological processes more typical of a
sustainable, resilient, and fire-adapted forest. This includes the need for development of
large, open, limby ponderosa pine for replacement eagle nesting structure along the upper
Williamson River corridor. I would like to delete this sentence.
4. In riparian areas, there is a need to improve vegetation diversity, address adverse soil and
water conditions, provide wildlife habitat, release native riparian plant species from
competition with conifers, and increase hardwood vigor and ability to regenerate.
5. There is a need to reduce road density and reduce adverse resource impacts of roads.
6. There is a need for healthy stands capable of sustaining timber products (including
commercial timber, post and poles, firewood and other products) to the local and regional
economies.
Proposed Action Alternative 2
In order to move the Red Knight area towards the spatial patterns, forest composition and
structure more typical of the historical fire-adapted, resilient forest a proposed action was
developed using principles in the Klamath Tribes’ management plant for the former Klamath
Reservation (Johnson et al., 2009) and other strategies discussed in the collaboration section
above.
Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer: Dry Forest Sites
Restore resilience of forest stands and landscapes to wildfire, insects and disease by reducing
stand densities and ladder fuels, and increasing spatial heterogeneity.
Restore more characteristic historical structure and composition of fire-adapted dry forests.
Implementation would include maintaining old (generally older than 150 years) and large trees in
clumps and as individuals. The publication Identifying Old Trees and Forests in Eastern
Washington (Van Pelt, 2008) would be used to help in identifying old trees that may be less than
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
25
21 inches DBH and are appropriate to retain within the context of restoration prescriptions.
Treatments would favor fire resistant species such as ponderosa pine over white fir and
lodgepole pine. All ponderosa pine, sugar pine and western white pine over 21” DBH would be
retained.
Ponderosa Pine, Mixed Conifer, and Lodgepole Pine Retention Patches
Restore the fine-scale and landscape-scale heterogeneity by maintaining untreated patches
(skips) within treated units and larger untreated areas across the landscape. Openings (gaps)
ranging from approximately ½ acre to two and ½ acres would also be created as part of the
spatial heterogeneity within the units. Retention areas would be chosen at two different scales:
1. Small scale/stand retention patches would be included in the 16,900 acres of forest
restoration thinning with small tree thinning. These patches would promote habitat
diversity within the stand, especially retain snag and log patches, protect spiritual,
cultural, and places of worship areas, promote visual quality and aesthetic values, and
would implement the Klamath Tribes Retention Patch Strategy for providing adequate
hiding cover for big game. Small scale retention patches would cover approximately 10-
15% of treated units and range in size from <1 to 5 acres. The retention patches would be
laid out after consultation with the district wildlife biologist and Tribal wildlife
representative. Approximately 1,690 – 2,535 acres would be maintained in small
scale/stand retention patches within the treatment units (10-15% of 16,900 acres; 10-15%
of “Restoration” on map).
2. Large scale/landscape retention patches would be chosen to contribute to the required big
game cover:forage (30:70) ratio from the Winema LRMP and to provide habitat for
wildlife species that prefer higher tree densities and canopy closure. Large
scale/landscape retention patches consist of approximately 2,590 acres of untreated areas
well-distributed across the Red Knight area including around Little Yamsay Mountain
and within management areas for goshawk and great grey owl. Skidding and
underburning would be permitted in the retention patches, if necessary, in a manner that
would not adversely affect the integrity of the retention patch. Limited treatment,
including small and larger tree density reduction for two drip lines (20-30 feet
approximately) near old trees to reduce competition and increase heterogeneity, would be
done over approximately 7,300 acres. Young white fir trees greater than 21” DBH may
be removed if they are within two drip lines of old ponderosa pines. Approximately
9,890 acres would be maintained in large scale/landscape retention patches well
distributed across the Red Knight area that vary in size from 10 to 250 acres (about 31%
of the Red Knight area; “No Treatment ” - 2,590 acres and “Limited Treatment” - 7,300
acres on map).
Alternative 2 - Modified Proposed Action – by treatment type
No Treatment – Goal: leave undisturbed to provide cover for big game and nesting
habitat for goshawks and great grey owls. As discussed above, areas around Little
Yamsay Mountain, part of the Jackson Creek corridor and goshawk minimum
requirement areas from the Winema LRMP would not be treated. These areas are
culturally very important to the Klamath Tribes and/or would contribute toward cover for
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
26
big game and habitat for goshawk and great grey owl. Approximately 2,590 acres – “No
Treatment” on map.
Winema LRMP Large White Fir Amendment – Goal: move multiple-layered
ponderosa pine stands towards late and old stages of a single layer where the white fir are
competing with ponderosa pine in ponderosa pine plant associations (Appendix B
Revised Interim Direction, pages 9-14). The Winema LRMP would be amended in order
to harvest white fir greater than 21” DBH and younger than 150 years old within the Red
Knight planning area. This amendment would apply to the following prescriptions:
limited treatment, forest restoration in ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine, forest
restoration with consideration of pileated habitat, lodgepole pine encroachment removal,
and aspen restoration. Up to approximately 26,880 acres.
Winema LRMP Scenic Standard Amendment – Goal: a combination of underburning
and pile burning to treat slash left after vegetation treatments in management area 3B -
scenic management along the Silver Lake Highway. The Winema LRMP would be
amended in order to exempt the above actions from scenic standard and guideline one for
management area 3B (4-107). This amendment would apply to the limited treatment and
forest restoration in ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine prescriptions. Underburning and
pile burning slash would scorch and create charred bark on a portion of trees and would
remain evident after three years over approximately 1,126 acres.
Limited Treatment – Goal: maintain and protect large old pine trees, reduce
competition, increase heterogeneity, and provide cover for big game. Limited treatment
would include commercial tree density reduction near old trees in past harvest units.
Removing competing trees from around old trees would occur for an approximate two
drip line or 20-30 foot radius. Harvest may include young white fir trees over 21” DBH.
Underburning to reduce accumulated ground fuels would be done in the spring or the fall
and would incorporate specific management objectives including limited mortality of old
and large trees. Pile burning may be considered in areas where underburning would not
achieve the desired objectives. In management area three, landings, decks, major skid
roads, temporary roads, and slash piles would be located to the rear of the stands to use
vegetative or landform screening opportunities. These would be located away from
critical line-of-sight viewing areas (Winema LRMP, 4-108). In all other areas, slash piles
within sight of roads would be burned, chipped, or removed within two to four years after
the close of the timber sale. Approximately 7,300 acres - “Limited Treatment (Large,
Old Tree Release)” on map.
Jackson Creek Corridor and Boundary Springs – Goal: reduce conifer densities (<7”
DBH) to lessen competition near large trees and hardwoods. The Jackson Creek Guard
Station would be moved from the riparian area. The toilets in the Jackson Creek
Campground would be removed and replaced with one vault toilet that meets current
health, safety and ADA requirements. Boundary Springs would be restored to its natural
condition by removing the water development infrastructure (concrete spring head, pipe,
and trough). Lopping and scattering of small tree thinning slash or hand piling and pile
burning would be the fuel reduction methods. Slash would not be piled within sight of
Jackson Creek. Piles within sight of roads or camping areas would be burned, chipped,
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
27
or removed within two to four years. Approximately 710 acres – “Jackson Creek
Corridor and Boundary Springs” on map.
Small Tree Thinning – Goal: improve vigor, reduce competition, and increase
heterogeneity. Small trees (<7” DBH) would be thinned with chainsaws using variable
spacing in previously harvested stands and plantations in management area (MA) 12.
Removing competing trees from around existing old trees for two drip lines would be
done to reduce competition. Lopping and scattering of slash, hand piling, and pile
burning would be the fuel reduction methods. Slash piles within sight of roads would be
burned, chipped, or removed within two to four years. Approximately 2,100 acres -
“Understory Thinning” on map.
Forest Restoration in Ponderosa Pine and Lodgepole Pine – Goal: maintain old trees
and reduce competitive stresses on them, increase heterogeneity, reduce stand density to
maintain large tree overstory structure. The general intent is to retain trees over 150
years of age. The approach would include utilizing variable spacing with ground-based
harvest systems in ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine plant associations. Thinning
densities would vary by plant association and objectives for the management area, and
would follow a prescription that retains the natural clusters of ponderosa pine. Harvest of
trees would generally be limited to trees under 150 years of age. Harvest of white fir
greater than 21” DBH and younger than 150 years old would be allowed. Commercial
thinning would be followed by variable density small tree thinning of less than 1 foot tall
and up to 6.9” DBH. Restoration treatments in the lodgepole pine plant associations
would include variable density thinning, creation of small openings (gaps) to facilitate
natural regeneration, salvage of dead where it exceeds snag and down woody
requirements, and an increase in structural diversity by leaving untreated clumps.
Lodgepole pine would be harvested where it is competing with ponderosa pine.
Slash from small tree thinning would be lopped and scattered. Hand piling, grapple
piling and pile burning would occur in areas of high fuels accumulations. In management
area three, landings, decks, major skid roads, temporary roads, and slash piles would be
located to the rear of the stands to use vegetative or landform screening opportunities.
These would be located away from critical line-of-sight viewing areas (Winema LRMP,
4-108). In all other areas, slash piles within sight of roads would be burned, chipped, or
removed within two to four years after the close of the timber sale. Spring or fall
underburning would be conducted in ponderosa pine plant associations to restore historic
conditions and would incorporate specific management objectives including limited
mortality of old and large trees. Pile burning may be considered in areas where
underburning would not achieve the desired objectives. Landing piles would be utilized
or burned. (Approximately 16,900 acres - “Restoration” on map. –actual acres treated
would be closer to 14,365 to 15,210 after small scale retention patches are laid out within
the treatment units)
Forest Restoration with Consideration of Pileated Habitat – Goal: maintain old trees
and reduce competitive stresses on them, increase heterogeneity, reduce stand density to
maintain large tree overstory structure, and provide structures and species of use to
pileated woodpeckers. This area is a part of the number one priority area for
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
28
implementation (see implementation priorities map) and provides the best opportunities
for white fir snags that pileated woodpeckers use. These acres also contain a large
number of old growth ponderosa pine that are threatened by white fir encroachment.
Removal of young (<150 year old) white fir threatening old growth trees would be a
priority. The intent, though, is to maintain white fir in this area. This area would also
follow a prescription that retains the natural clumping pattern of ponderosa pine, but
young white fir in the open would be given equal consideration in retention to ponderosa
pine, and clumps of white fir would be favored as skips. Young ponderosa pine
threatening old white fir would be removed as would young white fir around old
ponderosa pine. White fir >21” DBH and <150 years old would be harvested only if
competing with (within two drip lines) ponderosa pine and old sugar pine. Upper
Jackson Creek canyon in this area would be largely left untreated, as historically, white
fir was dominant in this canyon. Basal area targets would generally range from about 80
to 120 square feet, but the basal area targets would not be a basis for removing some old
trees as “surplus.” Previously harvested stands would have “Limited Treatment” as
described above to release old trees (mostly in the dry mixed conifer stands). Fuels
treatments would include lopping and scattering slash, hand piling, and pile burning.
Slash piles within sight of roads would be burned, chipped, or removed within two to
four years after the close of the timber sale. Landing piles would be utilized or burned.
No underburning would occur in the pileated area to maintain down woody material for
foraging. (Approximately 1,630 acres - “Restoration with Pileated Woodpecker
Consideration” on map. Past harvest units 358 acres within the Pileated Woodpecker area
would receive the Limited Treatment prescription thinning around existing old trees.
About 1,081 to 1,145 acres would receive restoration treatment after 10-15% is laid out
in retention patches.)
Lodgepole Pine Encroachment Removal - Goal: improve vegetation diversity, provide
wildlife habitat, release native riparian plant species from competition with conifers, and
increase hardwood vigor and ability to regenerate. In riparian corridors of hardwood
habitat and in riparian meadows (MA 8 and Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas
(RHCAs)), cut, girdle or otherwise kill and leave encroaching conifers generally less than
150 years old in hardwood and meadow habitat where it is not feasible to remove and/or
is desirable to leave onsite to deter browse of riparian vegetation. In areas where it is
feasible, commercial harvest of encroaching conifers would take place to reduce fuels,
competition, and restore riparian habitat. Additional lodgepole pine encroachment areas
discovered during implementation would also be treated. All actions within RHCAs
would comply with INFISH direction and RHCA objectives. Thinning slash would be
lopped and scattered and concentrations would be piled and burned. Slash piles within
sight of roads would be burned, chipped, or removed within two to four years after the
close of the timber sale. Creep from hand pile burning and/or from adjacent upland units
being burned would be allowed. Pile burning and underburning would reduce activity
fuel and aid in the reduction of encroaching lodgepole pine. Fall and spring
underburning would be considered. Approximately 950 acres - “Lodgepole
Encroachment Removal” – on map.
Aspen Restoration – Goal: reduce conifer competition and encourage aspen using aspen
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
29
restoration recommendations. Restoration would include cutting encroaching/competing
conifers (generally less than 150 years old and less than 21” DBH) and leaving some
slash on the ground to reduce browse by big game and livestock. Additional aspen areas
discovered during implementation would also be treated. Commercial harvest of the
competing conifers would be done where needed. Thinning slash would be lopped and
scattered and concentrations would be piled and burned. Slash piles within sight of roads
would be burned, chipped, or removed within two to four years after the close of the
timber sale. Creep from hand pile burning and/or from adjacent upland units being
burned would be allowed. Approximately 100 acres – “Aspen Restoration” on map.
Road Decommissioning, Closures, and Maintenance - Reduce road density and
resource damage by closing and decommissioning roads as recommended through
project-level travel analysis. Total miles of proposed closures (ML 2 or 3 ML 1): 4.3
miles.
Currently closed (ML 1) roads
to be decommissioned
Currently open (ML 2 or 3)
roads to be decommissioned
Total miles of proposed road
decommissioning
178.7 miles 55.1 miles 233.8 miles
o Prioritize decommissioning of the following roads with resource concerns:
1. FR 7650420 (1.9 miles, currently a ML 2 road, crosses Doeskin Creek).
2. FR 7600785 (1.8 miles, currently a ML 1 road, causing resource concerns
in Long Prairie)
3. FR 7600786 (1.3 miles, currently a ML1 road, causing resource concerns
in Long Prairie)
Total miles of proposed priority decommissioning: 5.0 miles
o Prioritize closure of the following roads:
1. Portion of FR 4900740 (0.9 miles of eastbound road segment from
Jackson Creek Campground to the end of the road is proposed to lower
from ML 2 to ML 1).
2. FR 7645460 (1.5 mile road to Boundary Springs proposed to lower from
ML 2 to ML 1).
Total miles of proposed priority closures: 2.4 miles
o Prioritize maintenance or reconstruction of the following roads:
1. FR 4973130 (3.6 mi proposed for storm proofing; drainage improvements)
2. Portion of FR 4975000 (0.8 miles between Rock Creek and FR 7645000
proposed for drainage improvements).
3. FR 7645460 (1.5 mile road to Boundary Springs proposed for
reconstruction and drainage improvements).
Total miles of proposed priority maintenance and reconstruction: 5.9 miles
Special Forest Product Removal – would include posts, poles, firewood and other
special forest products, from all treatment areas.
Prescribed Fire Maintenance Treatments – would occur over time following the initial
application of prescribed fire to manage natural fuels to levels more closely resembling
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
30
historic fuel loading, fire regime, and vegetative conditions.
Ground-based logging systems may include tree felling with mechanical harvesters or
chain saws, and yarding with skidders or forwarders. Vegetative treatments may include
leave tops attached, top removal and delimbing in piles or corridors.
Establish temporary roads to access portions of units that are not readily accessible from
existing forest roads or disturbed areas. Decommission temporary roads following
treatments.
Table 2 - Alternative 2, Modified Proposed Action
Treatment Type Description Goal Fuels Approx. Acres
No Treatment Areas around
little Yamsay,
near Jackson
Creek, Goshawk
and Great Grey
Owl areas
Leave
undisturbed to
provide cover for
big game and
habitat for
goshawks and
great grey owls
No treatment 2,590
Limited
Treatment
Previously
harvested areas
that will be left
untreated except
to reduce stress
on large (old)
ponderosa pine
Maintain and
protect large old
pine trees, reduce
competition,
increase
heterogeneity,
and provide
cover for big
game
Underburning and
pile burning to
reduce fuels, limit
large tree mortality
7,300
Jackson Creek
Corridor and
Boundary
Springs
Recreation area
for public and
Tribal members
Reduce conifer
invasion into
hardwood/forb
habitats, remove
buildings from
riparian area, and
restore spring
Lop and scatter
slash, hand pile and
burn piles
710
Small Tree
Thinning
Previously
harvested stands
not needed for
big game cover
Improve vigor,
reduce
competition, and
increase
heterogeneity
Lop and scatter
slash, hand pile and
burn piles
2,100
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
31
Treatment Type Description Goal Fuels Approx. Acres
Forest
Restoration in
Ponderosa Pine
and Lodgepole
Pine types
Forest with
remnant old tree
structure,
generally in the
ponderosa pine
type. Variable
density thinning,
creation of small
openings, dead
salvage, and
untreated clumps
in lodgepole pine
Protect old trees
of all species,
increase
heterogeneity,
increase stand
diameter, favor
ponderosa pine
and sugar pine
Lop and scatter,
hand and/or grapple
pile and burn in
high fuel
accumulations.
Underburning in
spring or fall to
limit mortality of
old and large trees;
lodgepole pine
types would not be
underburned
16,900
Forest
Restoration with
Consideration of
Pileated Habitat
Forest with
remnant old tree
structure,
generally in the
dry mixed
conifer type
Protect old trees
of all species,
increase
heterogeneity,
increase stand
diameter,
maintain young
white fir as part
of the stand in
addition to
ponderosa pine
and sugar pine
Lop and scatter
slash, hand piling,
and pile burning
1,630
Lodgepole Pine
Encroachment
Removal
Riparian
corridors of
hardwood habitat
and riparian
meadows
Remove conifers
that have
encroached on
meadows and
restore forbs and
hardwoods
Lop and scatter
and/or hand piling
and pile burning.
Underburning
would reduce
activity fuel and aid
in the reduction of
encroaching
lodgepole pine
950
Aspen
Restoration
Jackson Creek,
Boundary
Springs, and
other aspen areas
Reduce conifer
competition and
encourage aspen
Lop and scatter
slash;
concentrations
would be piled and
burned. Creep from
pile burning and/or
from adjacent
upland unit burning
would be allowed
100
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
32
PROPOSED ACTION REDKNIGHT_12_18_12.PDF
Insert proposed action map. Stored in T: drive. And as pdf.
Project Design Criteria/Features
Apply borax as a preventative measure to reduce the spread of Annosus root disease (caused by
the fungus Heterobasidion annosum) within 24 hours of cutting to conifer stumps greater than 18
inches in diameter and minimize the wounding of residual trees in order to decrease the risk of
introducing H. annosum as a cause of butt rot. (R-6 Fremont-Winema 2409.15-2011-Annosus
root disease control and stump treatment guides). Use of bumper trees may be appropriate to
reduce incidence of tree wounds, or season of harvest – springtime sap run is when bark of
ponderosa pines are very sensitive to bark wounding.
A goal during underburning and harvest operations would be to maintain plants of bitterbrush for
reseeding and to minimize the loss of 20-40 centimeter high plants to maintain and improve big
game forage over approximately 30 percent of the area burned or treated.
The removal of tops attached to the last log as allowed in the Timber Sale Contract is encouraged
to reduce fuels in residual stands. In order to reduce undesired effects to the residual stand,
removal of tops attached must be approved by the FSR, AFMO, and District Silviculturist to
determine the suitability of units for such treatment.
Ground-based logging system would be used for the harvest operations in Red Knight. Skid trails
would be located approximately 100-150 feet apart in order to meet the LRMP standard and
guideline of not exceeding 20 percent of the total acreage within the activity area in detrimental
soil conditions.
Tractor logging would generally not be prescribed when slopes exceed 35 %. Operating on short
pitches exceeding 35% has been deemed acceptable.
Small tree thinning (<7” DBH) should utilize a variable spacing to introduce heterogeneity in
plantations and understory trees in harvest units. Thinning leave trees to a 25% variation on 20
foot spacing (15-25 feet) and culturing around large and old trees for two driplines would be
recommended.
Landings would be created within units or in adjacent past harvested units/areas at a rate of one
landing (1/3-1/2 acres in size approximately) per 10-15 acres _ check on this number. Past
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
33
existing transportation system including landings, skid trails and roads would be evaluated for
use during harvest operations to reduce impact to the soil resource.
Retention of existing snags would done where safety is not compromised. Dead lodgepole pine
would be salvaged where not needed for down and dead woody requirements in all treatment
units.
Harvest of merchantable material in riparian, meadow and aspen areas that are adjacent to or
within proposed restoration treatment areas would be done in conjunction with the restoration
treatment while meeting the soils conditions requirements in those areas (get example fro
Chiloquin). Some standing trees dead or alive would be left in aspen areas to be felled or fall
over later to create barriers to browse after the harvest treatment where deemed necessary and
where possible. (Seager, 2010)
Firewood cutting in areas with down wood protecting aspen sprouts from browse would not be
permitted until the sprouts reach above browse level.
Sufficient sprouting of forbs, grasses and other hardwoods including aspen would be available
for wildlife.
Where grapple piling is necessary to reduce excess fuels, piles would be located along skid trails
or other disturbed sites wherever possible to reduce soil disturbance. Breaking up the fuels
profile for a buffer along roads would also be acceptable.
For vegetation management in MA 3B scenic management along the Silver Lake HWY –
Maintain large tree character except lodgepole pine. Openings may or may not have mature large
diameter trees, stumps shall be cut to 6 inches or less in height on the uphill side of the tree,
variable density thinning shall be used. Landings, decks, major skid roads, temporary roads and
slash piles should be located to the rear of the stands to use vegetative or landform screening
opportunities. These should be located away from critical line-of-sight viewing areas. Harvest
residues resulting from stand management activities may be evident, but blend where possible
with the surrounding landscape characteristics.
For vegetation management in MA 15 Upper Williamson – provides a natural-appearing forest
setting for dispersed recreation activities and special wildlife habitats. Scenic management
activities shall generally achieve the foreground partial retention level as described in 3B above.
Uprooted stumps are not desirable, and should be removed unless they are blended to appear
natural in the landscape.
All live and dead ponderosa pine over 21” DBH would be retained in the stands. If a danger tree
over 21” DBH needs felling it will remain on site. No dead or down ponderosa pine would be
salvaged.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
34
Focus on describing the required outcome rather than specifying equipment or methods that must
be used to provide the purchaser or contractor some flexibility in completing required treatments.
(RF letter 3/30/2012). Need to describe soil acceptable detrimental damage, residual tree damage
after harvest operations, tree damage and mortality after underburning, percent of area or units
under burned..
Consider having the purchaser or contractor perform all needed brush disposal work in lieu of
assessing a BD deposit.
Consider requiring the removal of a portion of the Included Timber within 1 or 2 operating
seasons following award to increase jobs short term.
After thinning, hand piling or machine grapple piling along existing skid trails or roads; lopping
and scattering of slash; burning or chipping the piles or underburning of the stands will occur
after post harvest exams determine the need for slash disposal.
Appendix A
FSM 2000 Chapter 2020 – Ecological Restoration and Resilience
2020.5 Definitions
Clump – A clump is two or more trees in close enough proximity that their crowns are interlocking (Long
and Smith, 2000). (Recommendation from Churchill (2012) is to use trees within 20 feet of each other
with interlocking crowns when determining the size of a clump.
Sustainability – Meeting needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their needs. Sustainability is composed of desirable social, economic, and ecological
conditions or trends interacting at varying spatial and temporal scales, embodying the principles of
multiple-use and sustained-yield (FSM 1905).
Resilience – The ability of a social or ecological system to absorb disturbances while retaining the same
basic structure and ways of functioning, the capacity for self-organization and the capacity to adapt to
stress and change. (FSM 1905)
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
35
Restoration – The process of assisting the recovery of an ecosystem that has been degraded, damaged,
or destroyed. Ecological restoration focuses on establishing the composition, structure, pattern and
ecological processes necessary to facilitate terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem sustainability, resilience
and health under current and future conditions. (FSM 1905)
Adaptive management – A system of management practices based on clearly identified outcomes and
monitoring to determine if management actions are meeting desired outcomes, and if not, to facilitate
management changes that will best ensure that outcomes are met or reevaluated. Adaptive
management stems from the recognition that knowledge about natural resource systems is sometimes
uncertain (36 CFR 219.16; FSM 1905)
Retention Patch – from Klamath Tribes’ Retention Patch Strategy
2020.6 Principles
Ecosystems are dynamic and change is inevitable.
Public involvement and consultation with Indian Tribes is important in setting objectives for restoration.
Knowledge of past and current ecosystem dynamics, current and desired conditions, climate change
projections and human uses is fundamental to planning restoration activities.
Adaptive management, monitoring and evaluation are essential to ecological restoration.
Appendix B: Landscape Analysis for Red Knight
Landscape evaluation process for Red Knight:
Step 1: Determine the extent of the landscape evaluation area: Two or more subwatersheds
are recommended (12th
field hydrologic unit code) totaling between 10,000 and 40,000 acres.
Since the size of Red Knight is large, the IDT determined it was large enough for a landscape
level assessment (~32,000 acres). Cumulative effects analysis for wildlife may require a larger
evaluation area. The former Klamath Reservation boundary of 1954 was used for cumulative
effects on treaty rights and the Klamath Tribes.
Step 2: Describe the current condition/landscape pattern: The vegetative pattern was
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
36
evaluated using stand exam information (1993, which delineated the stand polygons) and GNN
data (2006). Cover types were determined from Plant Associations of the Central Oregon Pumice
Zone (Volland, 1988) and Forested Plant Association of the Oregon East Cascades (Simpson,
2007). The 500+ stands were stratified into the 7 structural classes based on O’Hara, et al; and
modified by Hessberg, et al. 2000 (Brown, 2011).
Step 3: Determine reference landscape patterns. Historical vegetation information from The
Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Project Scientific Assessment (ICBEMP, Quigley and
Arbelbide, 1997) and Hagmann’s interpretation of 1920 forest inventory by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs (Hagmann, unpublished data, 2012, BIA) was used to determine the HRV for Red Knight
and the broad scale assessment of patterns. Historical records including Government Land
Office notes, notes of Munger (1917), Leiberg (1899), Timber Type map of Klamath Tribes
Reservation (1934), and ICBEMP reports were used. GNN data was queried for current
conditions and HRV (M. Simpson, Yamasaki, 2012. Simpson used GLO records to determine
historical condition.).
Evaluate the departure of the landscape vegetation from historical conditions: The
current condition is compared to the HRV percentages in each structural category
and the differences are quantified and described. A table showing the relative
differences between historical and current conditions by each biophysical
environment is to be included in the EA (complies with Winema LRMP – as
amended by Eastside Screens).
Keala Hagmann (graduate student at UW) has determined historical spatial
patterns across Red Knight and will be sharing this information with the IDT.
This info will help determine the historical old tree densities and what the desired
future condition of the stands will be (clumpy pattern in ponderosa pine old trees).
Step 4: Determine the Fire regime and departure from the historical regime across the
landscape. (Tim Yurkiewicz and Faith Brown). Biophysical environments matrix table was
created using Agee info (get citation from Tim. During the review of the FRCC information from
LANDFIRE (national level analysis) Tim Y. and Faith B. agreed that the model did not reflect
the project area accurately. The GIS data used for the analysis reflects the biophysical setting,
watershed and landscape of the Red Knight area. Local knowledge and field observations were
used to calibrate and refine the FRCC to better represent the Red Knight conditions.
Step 5: Locate MR habitats for species of interest; determine cover:forage ratio across the
landscape. Terry Simpson (wildlife biologist) with Faith Brown (silviculturist) looked at stand
exam information and used local knowledge to map MRs as required under the Winema LRMP
(using species and habitat requirements from the LRMP. Ex: great grey owl and goshawk MR
located on south end of Long Prairie is in dense older lodgepole pine stands and there is an
existing great grey owl nest in the area. Two other goshawk MRs were located in dense stands
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
37
on buttes and the pileated MR was located in stands that had large white fir as a component of
the stand and were located mostly above the precipitation threshold for maintaining white fir).
Terry determined the cover:forage ratio for the Red Knight area. Jen Sanborn and Faith Brown
worked together estimating the effects of proposed treatments on wildlife habitats including
cover and forage. RHCAs (riparian habitat conservation areas) were identified for treatment
including aspen restoration patches and lodgepole pine encroachment thinning out of meadows
through field reconnaissance by the wildlife biologist and silviculturist.
Step 6: Roads Analysis: Travel Analysis was conducted for the Modoc and adjacent Red
Knight areas by the IDT. IDT established criteria questions and identified road-by-road
recommendations and improvement opportunities. These recommendations may be analyzed and
some may be part of the proposed action in the NEPA document.
FRCC (from Tim Y.)
During the review of the FRCC information obtained from Landfire data Chemult Fire
management and the district silviculturist agreed that the model did not reflect the area
accurately. This was most evident on the drainages and meadows where the Landfire data
reported that these areas were in a condition class of 2 but on the ground knowledge says
otherwise. This discrepancy in the Landfire data and local knowledge is partly due to the
Landfire information being processed at a national level so the scale for the analysis can miss the
frequent successional model that the project area consist of.
To create a more representative FRCC model of the Red Knight project area a local GIS analysis
was completed. In order to achieve this calibration the district used the same tool that Landfire
uses to create the National FRCC map, except the data for this analysis was at the local project
level. The GIS data that is used to perform the analysis reflects the biophysical setting,
watershed, and landscape of the project area.
The reference condition class is part of the analysis in which the GIS data correlates to and
determines how far departed the study area is from its historical range of variance. Since the fire
frequency for this area has historically been frequent low intensity fires the scale for the
landscape can be done at the project level and still capture the successional patterns that are part
of this project areas ecology. Upon review of the reference condition class table Chemult fire
management and the district silviculturist corrected several of the succession classes to more
accurately reflect what the current stage is as well as some discrepancies in the interpreted
historical representation. These corrections were made from field observations and more
relevant local historical data.
With these changes the final result of the FRCC departure analysis more closely reflected what
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
38
observations were made from the field. There were a few areas where there was insufficient data
at the project level to obtain an effective FRCC analysis but those areas were mostly in the
meadows which have minimal impact on the FRCC for the entire project area.
Appendix C:
Big Bill Watershed Analysis
The watershed analysis done in 1998 found the following conditions and trends and
recommendations for the prevalent plant communities and seral stages in the watershed. Red
Knight lies within the 5th
field hydrologic unit Williamson River above Klamath Marsh
(#1801020101) and two 6th
field hydrologic units: Long Prairie (#180102010105) and Yamsay
(#180102010104).
Hydrologic function of the Williamson River Basin has changed over time resulting in less water
being retained in the system later in the year.
There is great variability from year to year of the total precipitation. It is not uncommon for 4-6
consecutive years to be significantly above or below the average. There is a boom/bust nature of
the precipitation reflected in the variability of total stream discharge.
Thinning stands either mechanically or by fire to provide growing space for hardwood species
and grasses/sedges and forbs would increase the diversity of the ponderosa pine stands.
Management to increase the old tree component in the ponderosa pine type could be
accomplished most quickly by thinning out the advanced regeneration stands and favoring
ponderosa pine, whether or not a residual overstory stand is present. Management in the mixed
conifer will be dictated by the amount of risk to fire, insects and disease that management is
willing to incur. The lowest risk alternative would be to return these stands to a single-story
ponderosa pine type.
There has been a reduction in large-tree dominated stands, with corresponding increase in poles
and seedling/sapling dominated stands. The large ponderosa pine tree component within the
watershed has been reduced due to harvest and competition. Seral composition is shifting to
favor white fir.
Many stands in the watershed are crowded with small trees competing with large trees for
nutrients, water, and growing space. The general forest health of the Modoc area shows most
stands not receiving some sort of vegetation management in the past 15-20 years are showing
signs of decline, low vigor, recent tree mortality, and are at moderate to high risk of beetle
attack.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
39
The ability to maintain current old-growth structure in overstocked condition in the short term
and grow old-growth structure in the long term is compromised with overstocked conditions.2 A
balance should be maintained where stocking remains high enough to develop structural
decadence that is a necessary part of old-growth habitat, but yet is not so high that mortality
collapses the stand prematurely.
Willows are in serious decline as evidenced by the preponderance of dead willow carcasses.
Riparian systems appear to be drying out and willows are being heavily browsed. Very little
flowering is occurring. Lodgepole pines are overtopping the willows in many areas. Quaking
aspen is also disappearing from the system.
The watershed analysis recommended removal of encroaching lodgepole pine, thinning of
overstocked stands to reduce fire risk and promote stand health, and thinning of plantations to
encourage good growth.
The Big Bill Watershed Analysis recommended that restoration of fire within the Williamson
River watershed should be emphasized within the ponderosa plant communities. Fire should be
applied at intervals not exceeding every 30-40 years to ensure that the understory vegetation
(bitterbrush) does not become a severe fire hazard. Unburned islands should be left throughout
the burned areas for seed sources and interim big game forage. In general, mixed conifer
communities will require mechanical treatments prior to restoring fire, due to continuous ladder
fuels and densely stocked stands. Combination treatments of thinning, followed by prescribed
burning, can be very effective in reducing stand replacement wildfire hazard. In addition these
treatments would increase stand resilience to other disturbances such as insects and disease.
Changes that have occurred within the analysis area are a combination of events over time
combined with human activities and their intervention and interruption of natural processes. The
most obvious has been the interruption of natural fire regimes. The primary reasons have been to
protect timber resources in an effort to gain more growth and production. The other common
interruptions are the road systems that crisscross the riparian systems, and the ditching, diverting,
and changing of the water movement to and through riparian systems. The primary reasons have
been to improve access for timber harvesting, improving riparian areas for pasturing and growing
livestock, and to provide water for domestic use. The changes to these habitats (upland and
riparian) has benefitted those species of wildlife that were adapted to the conditions that have
been created, and has reduced or eliminated those species that could not adapt.
2 Overstocking is defined as a point at which a given plant series (i.e. ponderosa pine and lodgepole pine) has
exceeded carrying capacity for the site and tree mortality has begun due to competition for the site's resources (i.e.
water and nutrients).
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
40
Appendix D:
Prescription table with stand numbers and acres (everything table)
Need to insert table with 506 stands or so
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
41
Restoration Treatment Proposed Action - Alternative 2:
The publication Identifying Old trees and Forests in Eastern Washington (Van Pelt, 2008) would
be used to help in identifying old trees that may be less than 21 inches DBH and are appropriate
to retain within the context of restoration prescriptions. Treatments would favor fire resistant
species such as ponderosa pine over white fir and lodgepole pine. All ponderosa pine over 21”
DBH would be retained.
No Treatment (NT and nt in RX table) areas include Little Yamsay Mountain, part of the
Jackson Creek corridor and goshawk minimum requirement areas from the Winema LRMP.
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
42 STAND_NUM ACRES SALE Priorty_v stage Exist_c alt2_c mr STAND_NU_1 SALE_1 RX Priorty__1 Species S__Stage TPA_21" notes Plant_grouPlant_Asso
9000228 56 low yes y 9000228 HSP low pp 5 0 pp
8921048 37 high yes n 8921048 HSP high wf/lp/pp 6 0 bndry spr/aspenpp CWS112
8921049 14 high yes n 8921049 HSP high wf/lp/pp 6 0 bndry spr/aspenpp CWS112
9021231 47 low yes y 9021231 HSP low pp 6 0 pp CPS212
9021232 65 low yes y 9021232 HSP low pp 6 23 pp CPS213
9021227 45 low yes y 9021227 HSP low wf/pp 6 0 edge of Jackson creekpp CPS212
9021226 78 high yes n 9021226 HSP high pp 6 0 Jackson Cr. CGpp CPS211
9221435 31 low bigfir yes y 9221435 HSP low wf/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9221432 21 low bigfir yes y 9221432 HSP low wf/pp 6 0 mcon jackson creekpmcon CWS112
9021247 73 high yes n 9021247 HSP high wf/lp/pp 6 0 pp pp CPS213
9221434 41 medium yes y 9221434 HSP medium pp 6 18 p CPS213
9221436 15 low bigfir yes y 9221436 HSP low wf/lp/sp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9221430 66 medium yes n 9221430 meadow HSP medium lp/pp 6 13 Jackson Creek pp CLM9
9021246 96 high yes y piwo_p 9021246 HSP high wf/sp/pp 6 0 pp pp CWS112
9221431 29 medium yes n 9221431 HSP medium pp 6 20 edge of Jackson creekpp CPS211
77010110 16 Little Skeeter unit 10 yes y 77010110 Little Skeeter unit 10HTH/spc 1 0
9221440 49 medium yes n 9221440 HTH/spc medium pp 3 0 blackbarks p CPS213
8921029 50 medium yes n 8921029 HTH/spc medium lp 4 0 flat lp lp CLM311
9321260 22 medium yes n 9321260 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 4 0 lp lp CLS211
9321259 65 medium yes n 9321259 HTH/spc medium lp 4 0 lp lp CLS211
9321248 19 medium yes n 9321248 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 4 0 lp lp CLS211
9321247 13 medium yes n 9321247 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 4 0 lp lp CLS211
lp n of* 402 yes n lp n of* HTH/spc lp/pp 4 0
no data 66 South Jackson 7. 8, 9, 11, 12low yes y no data South Jackson 7. 8, 9, 11, 12HTH/spc low 4 0 pp CPS213
8921023 42 low yes y 8921023 HTH/spc low pp/lp 5 0 aspen pp CPS215
8921054 21 low yes y 8921054 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 salvage lp pp CPS215
8921053 39 low yes y 8921053 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS215
8921052 9 low yes y 8921052 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS215
8921084 53 medium yes n 8921084 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CLS211
8921108 16 low yes y 8921108 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS215
8921056 44 medium yes n 8921056 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS215
8921027 22 low yes y 8921027 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 4 pp CPS215
8921030 57 medium yes n 8921030 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 meadow/aspenpp CLM211
8921079 8 low yes y 8921079 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 Dillon Creek pp CLM211
8921110 73 low yes y 8921110 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 doeskin creek pp CPS212
8921112 59 medium yes n 8921112 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 lp encr. Doeskin creekpp CLS215
8921031 50 medium yes n 8921031 HTH/spc medium pp/lp 5 0 pp CLS214
8921036 20 low yes y 8921036 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 pp CLS215
8921113 45 low yes y 8921113 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 big lp pp CLS211
8921082 98 medium yes n 8921082 HTH/spc medium 5 0 pp
8921151 106 medium yes n 8921151 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS314
8921121 144 high yes n 8921121 HTH/spc high lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS213
8921085 37 medium yes n 8921085 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS314
8921134 11 medium yes n 8921134 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CLS211
8921125 73 medium yes n 8921125 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
8900064 46 medium yes n 8900064 HTH/spc medium pp/lp 5 0 pp
8921133 72 medium yes n 8921133 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
8921119 10 low yes y 8921119 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 near drainage pp CPS213
8921116 742 medium yes n 8921116 HTH/spc medium pp 5 7 cinder part pp CPS215
8921046 223 high yes n 8921046 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 5 0 doeskin creek pp CPS215
8921138 87 low yes y 8921138 HTH/spc low lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
8921070 44 medium yes n 8921070 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS215
8921051 34 medium yes n 8921051 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 5 0 aspen wet pp CLM211
8921131 17 medium yes n 8921131 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
8921103 9 low yes y 8921103 HTH/spc low wf/lp/sp/pp 5 0 pp CPS311
8921104 58 high yes n 8921104 HTH/spc high wf/pp 5 0 pp pp CPS213
9321231 36 medium yes n 9321231 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CLS211
9021120 63 high yes n 9021120 HTH/spc high lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS211
9321265 16 medium yes n 9321265 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CLS211
9021139 26 medium yes n 9021139 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CLS211
9021124 125 high yes n 9021124 HTH/spc high lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS211
9021132 32 low yes y 9021132 HTH/spc low pp 5 0 pp CPS213
9021133 48 medium yes n 9021133 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 pp CPS213
9021135 61 medium yes n 9021135 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 Deely/rock creekpp CPS213
9321257 72 medium yes n 9321257 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 10 pp pp CLS211
9021152 28 medium yes y 9021152 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 pp CPS213
9321233 40 medium yes n 9321233 HTH/spc medium lp 5 0 lp lp CLS211
9021141 58 medium yes n 9021141 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
9021142 43 medium yes n 9021142 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 pp CPS212
9021143 114 medium yes n 9021143 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 pp CPS212
9021154 42 low yes y 9021154 HTH/spc low wf/lp/pp 5 0 riparian pp CPS212
9321255 26 medium yes n 9321255 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CPS212
9000149 48 medium yes n 9000149 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 pp
9021168 53 high bigfir yes n 9021168 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 5 0 knight creek pp CLM111
9021166 39 medium yes n 9021166 HTH/spc medium wf/pp 5 0 mcon mcon CPS213
9021170 34 high yes n 9021170 HTH/spc high lp/pp 5 0 pp CLS211
9021169 78 high yes n 9021169 HTH/spc high lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
9021199 46 high yes n 9021199 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS311
9021175 60 low yes y 9021175 HTH/spc low pp 5 0 pp CPS213
9321241 129 medium yes n 9321241 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CLS211
9021181 70 medium yes n 9021181 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 blackbarks pp CPS212
9021192 29 high yes n 9021192 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
9021212 83 high yes n 9021212 HTH/spc high lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
9321245 73 medium yes n 9321245 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CPS212
9321217 38 medium yes n 9321217 HTH/spc medium lp 5 0 big lp/dense poleslp CLS211
9021218 134 medium yes n 9021218 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 pp CPS212
9321266 30 medium yes n 9321266 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CLS211
9221441 45 medium yes n 9221441 HTH/spc medium pp 5 0 p CPS211
8921078 200 medium yes n 8921078 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 22 pp CPS215
8921055 105 low yes y 8921055 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 10 ne knob/dense regenpp CPS311
8921061 134 medium yes n 8921061 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 17 pp CPS311
8921022 24 low yes y 8921022 HTH/spc low pp/lp 6 10 pp CPS215
8921109 77 medium yes n 8921109 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 10 Dillon Creek pp CPS214
8921028 23 low yes y 8921028 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 11 pp CPS215
8921057 15 low yes y 8921057 HTH/spc low lp/pp/sp 6 11 pp CPS312
8921111 13 low yes y 8921111 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 26 pp CPS212
8921086 134 low yes y 8921086 HTH/spc low pp 6 19 pp CPS213
8921035 158 medium yes n 8921035 HTH/spc medium pp/lp 6 14 pp CPS215
8921114 712 medium yes n 8921114 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 21 big unit pp CPS212
8921033 16 low yes y 8921033 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 10 flat pp CPS215
8921062 44 medium yes n 8921062 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 14 pp CPS215
8921115 628 medium yes n 8921115 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 18 big unit pp CPS212
8921038 230 high yes n 8921038 HTH/spc high pp/lp 6 0 pp CPS215
8921063 213 medium yes n 8921063 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 14 Dillon Creek pp CPS215
8921087 105 medium yes n 8921087 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 27 pp CPS311
8921090 75 medium yes n 8921090 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 17 doeskin creek pp CPS212
8921089 75 low yes y 8921089 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 20 pp CPS213
8921123 117 high yes n 8921123 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 12 pp CPS213
8921136 105 medium yes n 8921136 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 16 cut lp pp CPS212
8921093 31 low yes y 8921093 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 20 pp CPS215
8921094 129 medium yes n 8921094 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 20 pp CPS212
8921041 90 medium yes n 8921041 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 6 12 fir/cherry pp CWS112
8921092 31 low yes y 8921092 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 13 pp CPS215
8921067 21 low yes y 8921067 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 11 lp encroachmentpp CWS112
8921128 72 high yes n 8921128 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 19 pp CPS212
8921039 218 high yes n 8921039 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 17 fir pp CPS215
8921127 43 low yes y 8921127 HTH/spc low pp 6 18 pp CPS212
8921120 56 medium yes n 8921120 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 11 doe creek pp CLS211
8921137 62 low yes y 8921137 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 10 pp CLS211
8921096 173 high yes n 8921096 HTH/spc high pp 6 13 pp CPS212
8921071 82 high yes n 8921071 HTH/spc high pp/lp/wf 6 0 pp CWS114
8921129 36 low yes y 8921129 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 11 large lp pp CPS212
8921102 33 high yes n 8921102 HTH/spc high wf/lp/sp/pp 6 19 pp CWS112
8921069 17 medium yes n 8921069 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 6 20 big lp pp CPS215
8921074 144 high yes n 8921074 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 17 pp CPS311
8921042 87 medium yes n 8921042 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 15 pp CPS311
9021102 58 medium yes n 9021102 HTH/spc medium pp 6 13 pp CPS212
8921100 25 medium yes n 8921100 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/sp/pp 6 9 mcon mcon CWS112
8921101 28 high yes y 8921101 HTH/spc high wf/sp/pp 6 16 pp pp CPS311
9021101 39 medium yes n 9021101 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 12 pp CPS212
8921118 61 medium yes n 8921118 HTH/spc medium pp 6 0 pp CPS212
8921044 290 high yes n 8921044 HTH/spc high lp/wf/pp/sp 6 16 fir pp CWS112
9021103 77 medium yes n 9021103 HTH/spc medium pp 6 15 pp CPS213
9021104 48 low yes y 9021104 HTH/spc low pp 6 20 pp CPS213
9021105 130 medium yes n 9021105 HTH/spc medium pp 6 10 pp CPS213
9321263 11 medium yes n 9321263 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CPS212
9321262 13 medium yes n 9321262 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLM9
8921105 78 medium yes n 8921105 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 19 pp pp CPS213
8921099 229 medium yes n 8921099 HTH/spc medium pp 6 18 pp CPS213
8921043 77 medium yes n 8921043 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 11 knob pp CPS213
8921106 89 medium yes n 8921106 HTH/spc medium pp 6 26 pp CPS311
9321261 26 medium yes n 9321261 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CPS212
9021107 75 medium yes n 9021107 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 12 pp CPS212
9321262 19 medium yes n 9321262 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLM9
9021106 20 medium yes n 9021106 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 15 aspen Rock creekpp CPS212
9021121 27 medium yes n 9021121 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 16 doeskin creek pp CPS211
9021114 31 medium yes n 9021114 HTH/spc medium pp 6 19 pp CPS213
9021113 48 medium yes n 9021113 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 15 pp CLS213
9021117 60 medium yes n 9021117 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 6 17 big wf/root rot/pileatedpp CPS213
9021122 19 low yes y 9021122 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 11 pp CPS211
9021115 80 high yes n 9021115 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 10 Deely meadowpp CPS213
9021112 49 medium yes n 9021112 HTH/spc medium pp 6 11 Deely/ north sidepp CPS213
9321229 59 medium yes n 9321229 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 17 pp pp CPS212
9021109 64 medium yes n 9021109 HTH/spc medium pp 6 11 Deely/rock creekpp CPS213
9021118 48 high yes n 9021118 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 20 pp CPS213
9021134 66 medium yes y 9021134 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 16 Deely creek pp CPS213
8921107 19 medium bigfir yes y 8921107 HTH/spc medium wf/pp 6 16 big wf mcon CPS311
9321232 47 medium yes n 9321232 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
9021127 59 medium yes n 9021127 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 22 pp CPS213
9021138 125 medium yes n 9021138 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 13 pp CPS212
9021137 122 medium yes n 9021137 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 15 pp CPS212
9321230 41 low yes y 9321230 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 15 pp pp CPS212
9021249 45 high yes n 9021249 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 0 pp pp CPS212
9021140 57 medium yes n 9021140 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp old growth lp CPS212
9321234 35 medium yes n 9321234 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
8921047 46 medium yes n 8921047 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 6 12 fir mcon CPS311
9021249 0 high yes n 9021249 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 0 pp pp CPS212
9021123 61 high yes n 9021123 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 18 pp CPS212
9321258 45 medium yes n 9321258 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 10 pp pp CPS212
9321227 46 medium yes n 9321227 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 20 pp pp CPS212
9021129 81 medium yes n 9021129 HTH/spc medium pp 6 18 pp CPS213
9021130 37 medium yes n 9021130 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 16 pp CPS213
9021126 62 medium yes n 9021126 HTH/spc medium pp 6 16 pp CPS213
9021144 119 medium yes n 9021144 HTH/spc medium pp 6 15 pp CPS212
9021128 115 medium yes n 9021128 HTH/spc medium pp 6 18 pp CPS213
9021153 143 medium yes n 9021153 HTH/spc medium pp 6 0 pp CPS211
9021125 65 high yes n 9021125 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 19 pp CPS212
9021162 69 high yes n 9021162 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 17 mcon mcon CPS311
9321228 34 medium yes n 9321228 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 22 pp pp CPS212
9021150 133 medium yes n 9021150 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 19 pp CPS213
9021161 136 high yes n 9021161 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 21 pp CPS212
9021160 30 high yes n 9021160 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 16 pp CPS212
9021158 32 medium yes n 9021158 HTH/spc medium pp 6 23 pp CPS213
9021148 54 medium yes n 9021148 HTH/spc medium pp 6 23 pp CPS213
9021159 28 high yes n 9021159 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 18 pp CPS213
9021147 66 medium yes n 9021147 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 13 pp CPS212
9021145 39 medium yes n 9021145 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 11 drainage pp CPS211
9321256 27 medium yes n 9321256 HTH/spc medium pp/lp 6 14 pp pp CPS212
9021163 76 high yes n 9021163 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 22 doeskin creek pp CPS311
9321235 30 medium yes n 9321235 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
9021157 45 medium yes n 9021157 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 18 pp CPS213
9021146 121 medium yes n 9021146 HTH/spc medium pp 6 17 pp CPS212
9321226 89 medium yes n 9321226 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp wet lp CLS211
9021155 43 high yes n 9021155 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 10 riparian pp CPS211
9021165 91 high yes n 9021165 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 21 pp CPS212
9021156 43 high yes n 9021156 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 12 riparian pp CPS211
9021173 63 medium yes n 9021173 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 14 pp CPS213
9321221 113 medium yes n 9321221 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 15 pp pp CPS212
9021180 91 medium yes n 9021180 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 11 pp CPS212
9321236 17 medium yes n 9321236 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
9321236 34 medium yes n 9321236 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
9321237 67 medium yes n 9321237 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CPS212
9021193 148 high yes n 9021193 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 17 pp CPS212
9021164 37 medium yes n 9021164 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 6 18 mcon mcon CPS213
9021178 65 medium yes n 9021178 HTH/spc medium pp 6 14 pp CPS213
9021171 31 high yes n 9021171 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 11 pp CPS212
9021179 110 high yes n 9021179 HTH/spc high pp 6 13 root rots pp CPS212
9021172 45 medium yes n 9021172 HTH/spc medium pp 6 20 pp CPS213
9021176 68 medium yes n 9021176 HTH/spc medium pp 6 11 pp CPS212
9021167 60 medium yes n 9021167 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 19 pp CPS213
9321221 8 medium yes n 9321221 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 15 pp pp CPS212
9321254 44 medium yes n 9321254 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 11 pp pp CPS212
9021177 124 high yes n 9021177 HTH/spc high pp 6 10 pp CPS212
9021196 115 high yes y piwo_p 9021196 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 19 mcon big fir mcon CPS311
9021195 72 high yes n 9021195 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 14 pp CPS211
9321240 45 medium yes n 9321240 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 16 pp pp CPS212
9321220 75 medium yes n 9321220 HTH/spc medium pp/lp 6 19 pp pp CPS212
9021194 43 medium yes n 9021194 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 6 31 pp CPS211
9021185 102 medium yes n 9021185 HTH/spc medium pp 6 11 pp CPS212
9021186 117 medium yes n 9021186 HTH/spc medium pp 6 10 pp CPS213
9021208 92 high yes n 9021208 HTH/spc high wf/pp 6 15 mcon mcon CPS311
9321219 51 medium yes n 9321219 HTH/spc medium pp/lp 6 13 pp pp CPS212
9321253 22 medium yes n 9321253 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 10 pp pp CPS212
9021183 118 medium yes n 9021183 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 14 pp CPS212
9021184 160 medium yes n 9021184 HTH/spc medium pp 6 11 pp CPS212
9021211 75 medium yes n 9021211 HTH/spc medium wf/lp/pp 6 24 knight creek mcon CPS212
9321224 23 low yes y 9321224 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CPS212
9021182 119 medium yes n 9021182 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 16 pp CPS212
9021217 120 medium yes n 9021217 HTH/spc medium sp/pp 6 11 pp CPS212
9321218 32 medium yes n 9321218 HTH/spc medium pp/lp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
9021216 65 medium yes n 9021216 HTH/spc medium pp 6 13 pp CPS213
9321244 65 medium yes n 9321244 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
9021236 66 high yes n 9021236 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CPS311
9021237 31 medium yes n 9021237 HTH/spc medium wf/pp 6 0 pp pp CPS213
9021221 137 medium yes n 9021221 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 16 pp CPS212
9021223 84 high yes n 9021223 HTH/spc high lp/pp 6 0 pp CPS212
9021225 54 medium yes n 9021225 HTH/spc medium pp 6 0 riparian pp CPS212
9321249 29 medium yes n 9321249 HTH/spc medium pp/pp 6 20 pp pp CPS212
9221429 76 low yes y 9221429 fuel reductionHTH/spc low lp/pp 6 20 pp CPS212
9321250 43 high yes n 9321250 HTH/spc high pp/lp 6 15 pp pp CPS212
9221442 46 medium yes n 9221442 HTH/spc medium pp 6 0 p CPS211
9321251 72 medium yes n 9321251 HTH/spc medium pp 6 20 pp pp CPS212
9321252 8 medium yes n 9321252 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 12 pp pp CPS212
9221425 69 medium yes n 9221425 HTH/spc medium pp 6 11 pp CPS211
9221423 59 low yes y 9221423 HTH/spc low lp/pp 6 15 pp CPS211
9221443 20 medium yes n 9221443 HTH/spc medium wf/pp 6 20 pp p CPS213
9221444 18 medium yes n 9221444 HTH/spc medium sp/pp 6 10 pp p CPS213
9221422 23 medium yes n 9221422 HTH/spc medium pp 6 0 near Modoc pp CPS213
9021174 43 medium yes n 9021174 HTH/spc medium lp/pp 6 15 Little Yamsay pp CPS213
9021189 25 high yes y 9021189 HTH/spc high wf/lp/pp 6 13 Little Yamsay pp CWS112
jcreek 4 yes y piwo jcreek HTH/spc/wf 0 0
pplant 22 ppplant yes y piwo pplant ppplant HTH/spc/wf 3 0
77010334 49 LIL SKEETER 2- 34 yes y piwo 77010334 LIL SKEETER 2- 34HTH/spc/wf 4 0 mcon
77010330 45 LIL SKEETER 2- 30 yes y piwo 77010330 LIL SKEETER 2- 30HTH/spc/wf 4 0 mcon
85050125 51 Little Skeeter 25 yes y piwo 85050125 Little Skeeter 25HTH/spc/wf 4 0 mcon
85050132 57 Little Skeeter 32 yes y piwo 85050132 Little Skeeter 32HTH/spc/wf 4 0 mcon
9021202 49 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021202 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 5 0 big fir mcon CPS311
85050105 51 KNIGHT 05 yes y piwo 85050105 KNIGHT 05 HTH/spc/wf 5 0 piwo
85050107 19 KNIGHT 07 yes y piwo 85050107 KNIGHT 07 HTH/spc/wf 5 0 piwo
85050106 50 KNIGHT 06 yes y piwo 85050106 KNIGHT 06 HTH/spc/wf 5 0 piwo
85050108 16 KNIGHT 08 yes y piwo 85050108 KNIGHT 08 HTH/spc/wf 5 0 piwo
85050109 21 KNIGHT 09 yes y piwo 85050109 KNIGHT 09 HTH/spc/wf 5 0
85050110 7 KNIGHT 10 yes y piwo 85050110 KNIGHT 10 HTH/spc/wf 5 0
mcon 14 yes y piwo mcon HTH/spc/wf 5 0
9021191 49 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021191 HTH/spc/wf high wf/pp 6 0 knight creek mcon
9021198 54 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021198 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CPS213
9021197 32 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021197 HTH/spc/wf high wf/pp 6 21 pp CPS213
9021206 34 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021206 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 6 15 mcon mcon CPS311
9021209 39 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021209 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 6 0 aspen Knight creek mconmcon CWS112
9021210 70 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021210 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 6 11 mcon rocks mcon CPS311
9021205 66 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021205 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp 6 18 big fir mcon CWS112
9021207 37 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021207 HTH/spc/wf high wf/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9021240 70 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021240 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 6 0 riparian mcon mcon CWS112
9021204 40 high yes y piwo 9021204 HTH/spc/wf high wf/pp 6 0 mcon CPS311
9021203 54 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021203 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/sp/wwp/pp6 0 mcon mcon CWS114
9021239 73 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021239 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9021238 77 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021238 HTH/spc/wf high wf/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CPS213
9021241 51 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021241 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/wwp/pp 6 0 mcon big fir mcon CWS112
9021242 95 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021242 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/wwp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CPS311
9221521 32 low bigfir yes y piwo 9221521 HTH/spc/wf low wf/pp 6 20 mcon mcon CWS112
9221522 13 low bigfir yes y piwo 9221522 HTH/spc/wf low wf/lp/wwp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CPS212
9021245 40 high bigfir yes y piwo 9021245 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9021244 67 medium bigfir yes y piwo 9021244 HTH/spc/wf medium wf/lp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9221516 62 high bigfir yes y piwo 9221516 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/wwp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9221520 30 high yes y piwo 9221520 HTH/spc/wf high wf/pp 6 30 Jackson creek pp CWS112
9221519 22 high bigfir yes y piwo 9221519 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp 6 0 Jackson creek mcon CWS112
9221517 18 high bigfir yes y piwo 9221517 HTH/spc/wf high wf/lp/wwp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS114
9221518 33 low bigfir yes y piwo 9221518 HTH/spc/wf low wf/lp/wwp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS114
mc 17 yes y piwo mc HTH/spc/wf wf/lp/pp 6 0 mcon mcon
9321415 3 low yes y 9321415 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS212
rock qu* 5 no n rock qu* Limit Treat 0 0
9321416 0 low yes y 9321416 Limit Treat low 0 0 lp CLS211
9321410 1 low yes y 9321410 Limit Treat low 0 0 lp CLS211
9321424 0 low yes y 9321424 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS212
9321374 1 low yes y 9321374 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS212
9321397 0 low yes y 9321397 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS212
9321401 1 low yes y 9321401 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS211
9321372 0 low yes y 9321372 Limit Treat low 0 0 lp CLS211
9321373 0 low yes y 9321373 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS212
9321371 0 low yes y 9321371 Limit Treat low 0 0 lp CLS211
9321427 0 low yes y 9321427 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS212
meadow 9 yes n meadow Limit Treat 0 0
cind pit 9 no n cind pit Limit Treat 0 0
9321432 0 low yes y 9321432 Limit Treat low 0 0 pp CPS212
cind pit 7 no n cind pit Limit Treat 0 0
meadow 4 yes n meadow Limit Treat 0 0
knob 8 yes y knob Limit Treat 0 0
cind pit 2 no n cind pit Limit Treat 0 0
cind pit 2 no y cind pit Limit Treat 0 0
9221514 0 low yes y 9221514 Limit Treat low 0 0 CWS112
meadow 1 yes n meadow Limit Treat 0 0
cind pit 5 no n cind pit Limit Treat 0 0
8921050 108 low yes y 8921050 Limit Treat low lp/pp 1 0 lp plantation lp CPS215
8921080 145 low yes y 8921080 Limit Treat low pp 1 0 pp CPS215
8921141 21 past harvest low yes y 8921141 past harvest Limit Treat low lp/pp 1 0 pp CPS215
8921144 19 low yes y 8921144 Limit Treat low lp/pp 1 0 pp CPS215
8921145 16 low yes y 8921145 Limit Treat low lp 1 0 lp CPS215
8921152 29 past harvest low yes y 8921152 cinder ts Limit Treat low lp/pp 1 0 pp CPS212
8921132 50 low yes y 8921132 Limit Treat low lp/pp 1 0 past unit pp CPS213
9000108 93 past harvest low no y 9000108 past harvest Limit Treat low pp 1 0 pp
70040103 77 Long Prairie unit 3 yes y 70040103 Long Prairie unit 3Limit Treat 1 0
77010208 53 LEFTOVER 08 yes y 77010208 LEFTOVER 08 Limit Treat 1 0
88050217 73 ROW ERC 17 yes y 88050217 ROW ERC 17 Limit Treat 1 0
77010311 13 LIL SKEETER 2- 11 yes y 77010311 LIL SKEETER 2- 11Limit Treat 1 0 mtoe HCC
77010209 40 LEFTOVER 09 yes y 77010209 LEFTOVER 09 Limit Treat 1 0
88050203 25 ROW ERC 03 yes y 88050203 ROW ERC 03 Limit Treat 1 0
Row 14 35 Row 14 yes y Row 14 Row 14 Limit Treat 1 0
Row 16 58 ROW yes y Row 16 ROW Limit Treat 1 0
84030112 60 Brown eyes 12 yes y 84030112 Brown eyes 12Limit Treat 2 0
84030111 51 Brown eyes 11 yes y 84030111 Brown eyes 11Limit Treat 2 0
77010205 73 LEFTOVER 05 no y 77010205 LEFTOVER 05 Limit Treat 2 0
77010206 80 LEFTOVER 06 yes y 77010206 LEFTOVER 06 Limit Treat 2 0
77010202 52 LEFTOVER 02 yes y 77010202 LEFTOVER 02 Limit Treat 2 0
Row 48 ROW yes y Row ROW Limit Treat 2 0
77010204 67 LEFTOVER 04 no y 77010204 LEFTOVER 04 Limit Treat 3 0
77010203 39 LEFTOVER 03 yes y 77010203 LEFTOVER 03 Limit Treat 3 0
Row 12 52 ROW no y Row 12 ROW Limit Treat 3 0
84030101 31 Brown eyes 01 yes y 84030101 Brown eyes 01Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212,211
84030103 90 BROWN EYES 03 yes y 84030103 BROWN EYES 03Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
80040229 17 SCHOONER 29 yes y 80040229 SCHOONER 29 Limit Treat 4 0 pp
84030102 13 Brown eyes 02 yes y 84030102 Brown eyes 02Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
80040231 59 SCHOONER 31 yes y 80040231 SCHOONER 31 Limit Treat 4 0 pp
80040230 21 SCHOONER 30 yes y 80040230 SCHOONER 30 Limit Treat 4 0 pp
80040228 73 SCHOONER 09 and 28 yes y 80040228 SCHOONER 09 and 28Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
80040207 110 SCHOONER 08 and 07 no y 80040207 SCHOONER 08 and 07Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
84030109 67 BROWN EYES 09 yes y 84030109 BROWN EYES 09Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
80040232 10 SCHOONER 32 yes y 80040232 SCHOONER 32 Limit Treat 4 0 pp
80040210 32 SCHOONER 10 no y 80040210 SCHOONER 10 Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
8921142 247 low yes y 8921142 eb 15,16 Limit Treat low lp/pp 4 0 pp CPS215
80040211 61 SCHOONER 11 yes y 80040211 SCHOONER 11 Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
84030105 47 Brown eyes 05 yes y 84030105 Brown eyes 05Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
80040233 8 SCHOONER 33 yes y 80040233 SCHOONER 33 Limit Treat 4 0 pp
80040203 40 SCHOONER 03 no y 80040203 SCHOONER 03 Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS213
84030107 112 Brown eyes 06 and 07 yes y 84030107 Brown eyes 06 and 07Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS211
80040205 67 SCHOONER 05 no y 80040205 SCHOONER 05 Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
84030108 70 BROWN EYES 08 yes y 84030108 BROWN EYES 08Limit Treat 4 0 pp CPS212
88050218 208 ROW ERC 18, Long Prairie 2 and 4 yes y 88050218 ROW ERC 18, Long Prairie 2 and 4Limit Treat 4 0
9321246 13 medium yes n 9321246 Limit Treat medium lp/pp 4 0 lp lp CPS212
82080110 29 South Jackson 10 yes y 82080110 South Jackson 10Limit Treat 4 0 pp
Row 20 82 Row 20 yes y Row 20 Row 20 Limit Treat 4 0
Row 10 22 ROW no y Row 10 ROW Limit Treat 4 0
Row 8 83 ROW no y Row 8 ROW Limit Treat 4 0
Row 56 ROW no y Row ROW Limit Treat 4 0
85050133 52 Little Skeeter 33 yes y 85050133 Little Skeeter 33Limit Treat 4 0 mcon
8921077 20 low yes y 8921077 Limit Treat low lp/pp 5 0 next to pvt fencepp CPS215
82030102 28 East Bear 02 yes y 82030102 East Bear 02 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
82030105 21 East Bear 05 yes y 82030105 East Bear 05 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
8921021 15 low yes y 8921021 Limit Treat low pp 5 8 pp CPS211
82030101 22 East Bear 01 yes y 82030101 East Bear 01 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
82030106 36 East Bear 06 yes y 82030106 East Bear 06 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
82030104 42 East Bear 04 yes y 82030104 East Bear 04 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
8921058 64 low yes y 8921058 Limit Treat low lp/pp 5 8 steep pp CPS312
8900034 12 low mid yes y 8900034 Limit Treat low pp 5 0 pp
8921139 41 low yes y 8921139 eb 3 Limit Treat low pp 5 0 pp CPS312
82030114 24 East Bear 14 yes y 82030114 East Bear 14 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
82030113 18 East Bear 13 yes y 82030113 East Bear 13 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
8921122 18 high yes y 8921122 Limit Treat high pp 5 0 nt top of knob pp CPS213
82030118 24 East Bear 18 yes y 82030118 East Bear 18 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
8921124 18 low yes y 8921124 Limit Treat low pp 5 0 knob top pp CPS213
8921146 24 past harvest low yes y 8921146 past harvest Limit Treat low pp 5 0 nt pp CPS215
8921091 17 low yes y 8921091 Limit Treat low 5 0
84030120 33 Brown eyes 20 yes y 84030120 Brown eyes 20Limit Treat 5 0
8921126 48 low yes y 8921126 Limit Treat low lp/pp 5 0 between 2 ercspp CPS212
8921153 12 low yes y 8921153 Limit Treat low lp/pp 5 0 pp CPS212
91010203 69 Part of Cinder 03 yes y 91010203 Part of Cinder 03Limit Treat 5 0
82030121 207 East Bear 21 yes y 82030121 East Bear 21 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
84030121 65 Brown eyes 21 yes y 84030121 Brown eyes 21Limit Treat 5 0
84030117 90 Brown eyes 17 yes y 84030117 Brown eyes 17Limit Treat 5 0
84030118 86 Brown eyes 18 yes y 84030118 Brown eyes 18Limit Treat 5 0
8921097 37 high yes y 8921097 Limit Treat high wf/lp/sp/pp 5 0 mcon mcon CPS213
8921130 6 low yes y 8921130 Limit Treat low lp/pp 5 0 large lp pp CPS212
84030123 50 Brown eyes 23 yes y 84030123 Brown eyes 23Limit Treat 5 0
84030122 36 Brown eyes 22 yes y 84030122 Brown eyes 22Limit Treat 5 0
84030119 44 Brown eyes 19 yes y 84030119 Brown eyes 19Limit Treat 5 0
82030123 171 East Bear 23 yes y 82030123 East Bear 23 Limit Treat wf/pp 5 0 pp
8921117 25 high yes y 8921117 Limit Treat high pp 5 0 pp CPS213
8921147 20 low yes y 8921147 Limit Treat low wf/pp 5 0 pp CPS311
82030124 15 EB24 yes y 82030124 EB24 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
8921156 185 low yes y 8921156 Limit Treat low pp 5 0 nt pp CPS213
84030124 34 Brown eyes 24 yes y 84030124 Brown eyes 24Limit Treat 5 0
82030125 27 East Bear 25 yes y 82030125 East Bear 25 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
77010211 162 LEFTOVER 11 below road McCarty 10 above the roadyes y 77010211 LEFTOVER 11 below road McCarty 10 above the roadLimit Treat 5 0
77010207 96 LEFTOVER 07 yes y 77010207 LEFTOVER 07 Limit Treat 5 0
88050219 100 ROW ERC 19 yes y 88050219 ROW ERC 19 Limit Treat 5 0
85050102 111 Little Skeeter2 36 (south) and Knight 02 (north)yes y 85050102 Little Skeeter2 36 (south) and Knight 02 (north)Limit Treat 5 0
88050102 76 NARROW 02 yes y 88050102 NARROW 02 Limit Treat 5 0
85050103 14 KNIGHT 03 yes y 85050103 KNIGHT 03 Limit Treat 5 0
90010120 58 SANDBRUSH 16 and 20 yes y 90010120 SANDBRUSH 16 and 20Limit Treat 5 0
77010329 30 LIL SKEETER 2- 29 no y 77010329 LIL SKEETER 2- 29Limit Treat 5 0
88050304 80 ARROW 04 yes y 88050304 ARROW 04 Limit Treat 5 0 lp CLS211
77010307 67 Lil Skeeter2 - 07a yes y 77010307 Lil Skeeter2 - 07aLimit Treat 5 0
85050104 36 KNIGHT 04 yes y 85050104 KNIGHT 04 Limit Treat 5 0
9021219 17 low yes y 9021219 Limit Treat low 5 0 pp
9021222 26 medium yes n 9021222 Limit Treat medium lp/pp 5 0 riparian systempp CPS212
88050302 41 Arrow 2 no y 88050302 Arrow 2 Limit Treat 5 0 lp CLS211
row16pce 57 ROW yes y row16pce ROW Limit Treat 5 0
psthvst 105 psthvst yes y psthvst psthvst Limit Treat 5 0
82030110 25 East Bear 10 yes y 82030110 East Bear 10 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
82030112 122 East Bear 12 no y 82030112 East Bear 12 Limit Treat 5 0 pp
8921020 142 low yes y 8921020 Limit Treat low pp/lp 6 10 Bear Cr. pp CPS215
8921083 29 low yes y 8921083 Limit Treat low lp/pp 6 12 steep pp CPS312
8921026 11 low yes y 8921026 Limit Treat low lp/pp 6 8 pp CPS215
8921059 15 low yes y 8921059 Limit Treat low lp/pp/sp 6 19 n slope steep pp CPS312
8900037 31 low yes y 8900037 Limit Treat low pp 6 0 pp
8921088 27 low yes y 8921088 Limit Treat low pp 6 11 pp CPS213
8921095 140 medium yes n 8921095 Limit Treat medium lp/pp 6 16 knob pp CPS212
8921040 120 low yes y 8921040 Limit Treat low lp/pp 6 17 pp CPS215
8921098 18 low yes y 8921098 Limit Treat low pp 6 9 pp CPS213
9021111 86 medium yes n 9021111 Limit Treat medium pp 6 10 pp CPS213
9021131 63 medium yes n 9021131 Limit Treat medium lp/pp 6 11 s side of small buttepp CPS213
9021136 87 low yes y 9021136 Limit Treat low lp/sp/pp 6 11 pp CPS213
9021151 132 medium yes y 9021151 Limit Treat medium lp/pp 6 13 rock creek pp CPS213
9321238 71 low yes y 9321238 Limit Treat low lp/pp 6 10 pp pp CPS212
9321264 5 low yes y 9321264 Limit Treat low lp/pp 6 0 pp pp CPS212
9021229 60 medium yes n 9021229 Limit Treat medium pp 6 0 pp CPS213
9021230 62 low yes y 9021230 Limit Treat low pp 6 0 rocks pp CPS213
9221439 21 low yes y 9221439 Limit Treat low wf/sp/pp 6 0 pp p CPS213
9221428 58 low yes y 9221428 Limit Treat low pp 6 14 pp CPS212
8921066 16 meadow low yes y 8921066 meadow low meadow 0 0 Dillon meadowmdw CPS215
meadow 4 no n meadow meadow 0 0
meadow 5 no n meadow meadow 0 0
meadow 6 yes n meadow meadow 0 0
meadowLP 214 no n meadowLP meadow 0 0
mc flat 323 no n mc flat meadow 0 0
meadow 6 yes n meadow meadow 0 0
77010110 23 Little Skeeter unit 10 yes y 77010110 Little Skeeter unit 10NT 1 0
77010119 69 Little Skeeter 19 yes y 77010119 Little Skeeter 19NT 2 0
77010317 26 LIL SKEETER 2- 17 yes y 77010317 LIL SKEETER 2- 17NT 3 0
77010316 39 LIL SKEETER 2- 16 yes y 77010316 LIL SKEETER 2- 16NT 3 0
no data 185 South Jackson 7. 8, 9, 11, 12low yes y no data South Jackson 7. 8, 9, 11, 12NT low 4 0 pp CPS213
no data 21 South Jackson 7. 8, 9, 11, 12low yes y no data South Jackson 7. 8, 9, 11, 12NT low 4 0 ppplantation pp CPS213
8921068 15 high yes y gosh 8921068 nt high wf/wwp/pp 5 0 mcon mcon CPS215
9321222 96 medium yes y gosh 9321222 nt medium lp/pp 5 0 pp pp CLS211
9321239 57 medium yes y gosh 9321239 nt medium lp/pp 5 0 pp pp CPS212
9000187 44 past harvest low yes y 9000187 past harvest NT low lp/pp 5 0 pp
9321243 50 medium yes y gosh 9321243 nt medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CLS211
9021215 45 low yes y 9021215 NT low sp/pp 5 0 pp CPS213
9021214 51 low yes y 9021214 NT low sp/pp 5 0 pp CPS213
9321242 47 medium yes y gosh_p 9321242 nt medium lp/pp 5 0 pp pp CPS212
9321225 33 medium yes y gosh_p 9321225 nt medium lp/pp 5 0 lp lp CLS211
9221437 18 medium yes n 9221437 NT medium lp/pp 5 0 pp p CPS213
9221530 40 medium yes n 9221530 NT medium pp 5 0 open pp CPS213
Row 21 317 ROW no y gosh_p Row 21 ROW nt 5 0
Row 9 20 ROW yes y gosh Row 9 ROW nt 5 0
88050305 62 ARROW 5 yes y gosh 88050305 ARROW 5 nt 5 0 lp CLS211
8921024 55 low yes y gosh_p 8921024 nt low pp/lp 6 26 n. aspect pp CPS311
8921025 21 low yes y gosh 8921025 nt low lp/pp/sp 6 13 n. aspect pp CPS311
8921135 82 high yes n gosh_p 8921135 nt high pp 6 21 pp CPS213
8921072 16 high bigfir yes y gosh 8921072 nt high wf/lp/pp 6 19 mcon mcon CPS311
8921075 32 medium yes n gosh 8921075 nt medium wf/pp 6 12 pp CPS311
9021174 115 medium yes n 9021174 NT medium lp/pp 6 15 Little Yamsay pp CPS213
9021189 64 high yes y 9021189 NT high wf/lp/pp 6 13 Little Yamsay pp CWS112
9021188 93 high yes y 9021188 NT high wf/lp/pp 6 14 Little Yamsay pp CWS112
9021190 32 medium yes n 9021190 NT medium pp 6 0 Little Yamsay pp
9021213 57 medium yes n 9021213 NT medium sp/pp 6 20 Little Yamsay pp CPS213
9321223 158 medium yes y gosh 9321223 nt medium lp/pp 6 0 lp lp CLS211
9021234 51 low yes y 9021234 NT low lp/pp 6 14 pp CPS213
9021233 58 low yes y 9021233 NT low pp 6 18 pp CPS212
9021235 34 low yes y 9021235 NT low wf/pp 6 20 pp CPS212
9221524 52 low yes y 9221524 NT low wf/pp 6 0 mcon mcon CWS112
9221526 52 medium yes y 9221526 NT medium wf/pp 6 17 pp steep pp CWS112
9221438 28 medium yes y 9221438 NT medium wf/lp/pp 6 0 jackson/drainagep CPS213
9221433 6 low yes y 9221433 NT low wf/pp 6 0 pp p CPS212
9221523 36 medium yes n 9221523 NT medium wf/pp 6 23 pp pp CPS212
9021248 45 low yes y 9021248 NT low wf/lp/pp 6 0 mcon above Jackson creekmcon CPS213
9221525 48 medium yes n 9221525 NT medium wf/lp/pp 6 0 pp pp CWS112
9221527 48 low yes y 9221527 NT low wf/pp 6 17 pp pp CWS112
8921140 188 past harvest low yes y 8921140 past harvest spc low lp/pp 1 0 pp CPS215
77010210 64 LEFTOVER 10 yes y 77010210 LEFTOVER 10 spc 1 0
77010113 36 Little Skeeter 13 yes y 77010113 Little Skeeter 13spc 1 0
77010120 72 Little Skeeter unit 20 yes y 77010120 Little Skeeter unit 20spc 2 0
77010106 85 Little Skeeter 06 yes y 77010106 Little Skeeter 06spc 2 0
pp plan* 223 ppplant yes y pp plan* ppplant spc 3 0
past ha* 311 past harvest yes y past ha* past harvest spc 3 0
77010105 106 Litttle Skeeter unit 05 yes y 77010105 Litttle Skeeter unit 05spc 3 0
77010115 143 Little Skeeter 15 yes y 77010115 Little Skeeter 15spc 3 0
77010124 75 Little Skeeter 24 yes y 77010124 Little Skeeter 24spc 3 0
77010126 61 LIL SKEETER 2- 26 and Little Skeeter 26 below roadyes y 77010126 LIL SKEETER 2- 26 and Little Skeeter 26 below roadspc 3 0
77010323 60 LIL SKEETER 2- 23 no y 77010323 LIL SKEETER 2- 23spc 3 0
77010114 102 Little Skeeter 14 (below road) and L Skeeter 07yes y 77010114 Little Skeeter 14 (below road) and L Skeeter 07spc 3 0
80040204 293 SCHOONER 04 no y 80040204 SCHOONER 04 spc 4 0 pp CPS212
84030110 73 Brown eyes 10 yes y 84030110 Brown eyes 10spc 4 0 pp CPS212
84030116 175 past harvest yes y 84030116 past harvest spc lp/pp 5 0
8921150 21 past harvest low yes y 8921150 past harvest spc low lp/pp 5 0 nt pp CPS311
77010309 100 LIL SKEETER 2- 09 no y 77010309 LIL SKEETER 2- 09spc 5 0
Red Knight Silviculture Report 2012
Red Knight
43
