Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORIGINAL(Red)
IAGOY AND LYONS 151 WEST GAY STREETATTORNEYS AT LAW WEST CHESTER. PENNSYLVANIA 19380
(215)431-0400
U.S. POST OFFICE BUILDINGMICHAEL J. LYONS ROUTE 1. BOX 55STEPHEN P. LAGOY CHADDS FORD, PENNSYLVANIA 1931 7ROBERT C.EWING (215)388-7371LINDA L MacELREE
PLEASE REPLY TO WEST CHESTERMarch 19, 1986
Ellen Teplitzki, EsquireAssistant Regional CounselU.S. E.P.ARegion Three841 Chestnut StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19107
RE: Blosenski Land Fill
Dear Ellen:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Second Amended Complaintregarding Hartmetz v. Blosenski. If you need any furtherinformation, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
LAGOY AND LYONS
Robert C. Ewing
RCE/bd RECEIVEDfv;AR 211986
OF^CEOFRtSoNALCOUNSa
200338
ORIGINAL(Red)
LAGOY AND LYONS : ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFSBY: ROBERT C. EWING, ESQUIREATTORNEY I.D. NO: 38364151 West Gay StreetWest Chester, PA 19380(215) 431-0400
JACOB HARTMETZ and IRENE : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEASHARTMETZ, h/w, individuallyand as parents and guardians : CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIAof JAMES HARTMETZ, KATHERINEHARTMETZ and HOLLY HARTMETZ, : CIVIL ACTION - COMPLAINTminors,
Plaintiffs : NO. 84-07288
vs. :
JOSEPH BLOSENSKI, JR., and :ADA BLOSENSKI, h/w, indivi-dually and jointly by the :entireties and t/a BLOSENSKIDISPOSAL SERVICE; PERRY : 15PHILLIPS and JEANNE PHILLIPS, "-_. •&h/w, individually and jointly : •' .' ' ~= __„by the entireties; THE BUDD . :. --•. ^ _iiCO., TRAILER DIV. ; I.C.I. : "' ' co '~~AMERICAS, INC., A. JOHNSON ;- : tpCO.; SARTOMER CO., a/k/a : • - > •-->SARTOMER INDUSTRIES; L.N.P. - . : —CORP.; INLAND PUMPING & : ' " 1 1DREDGING CORPORATION and ' v, >BARNEY BURNHOUSE, :
Defendants
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiffs, JACOB AND IRENE HARTMETZ, husband and wife,-
are adult individuals and are the parents and natural guardians
Of minor Plaintiffs, JAMES HARTMETZ, KATHERINE HARTMETZ and HOLLY
HARTMETZ. All Plaintiffs reside at Tall Timbers, R.D. #2, Box
81H, Coatesville, Chester County, Pennsylvania.
200939
ORIGINAL(Red)
2. Plaintiffs JACOB AND IRENE HARTMETZ, presently own
property and live with their children, the minor Plaintiffs,
directly adjacent to a site known as Blosenski Dump on Route 340
in West Cain Township, 'Chester County, Pennsylvania which has
been listed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
as one of the 418 worst toxic wastes sites in the United States.
3. The Defendants, JOSEPH BLOSENSKI, JR., and ADA
BLOSENSKI, his wife, are adult individuals t/a BLOSENSKI DISPOSAL
SERVICE and reside at and/or do business at R.D. #1, Lippit Road,
Honeybrook, Chester County, Pennsylvania and from August 26, 1971
until the present time have been the owners or equitable owners
of a large dumpsite at Route 340, West Cain Township, Chester
Cou'nty, Pennsylvania, known as Blosenski Dump.
4. The Defendants, Perry Phillips and Jeanne Phillips, his
wife, are individuals residing at or doing business at Wilmington
Road, West Cain Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania, and from
February 19, 1953, until May 26, 1971, were the owners or
equitable owners of a dump site at Route 340, West Cain Township,
Chester County, Pennsylvania, presently known as Blosenski Dump.
5. Defendant, The Budd Company, Trailer Division, is a
corporation authorized and existing pursuant to the Laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, having a principal place of
business at Route 100, Eagle, Chester County, Pennsylvania, which
at all times relevant hereto has been engaged in the business of
manufacturing.
O00840
(Red;6. Defendant, I.C.I. Americas, Inc., is a corporation
authorized and existing pursuant to the Laws of the State of
Delaware, having a principal place of business at 310 Turner
Lane, Chester County, Pennsylvania, which at all times relevant
hereto has been engaged in the business of manufacturing.
7. Defendant, A. Johnson Company, is a corporation
authorized and existing pursuant to the Laws of the State of
Delaware, having a principal place of business at 215 Welsh Pool
Road, Lionville, Chester County, Pennsylvania, which at all times
relevant hereto has been engaged in the business of
manufacturing.
8. Defendant, Sartomer Company, a/k/a Sartomer Industries,
is or are a corporation(s) authorized and existing pursuant to
the Laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of
business at Bolmar and Nields Streets, West Chester, Chester
County, Pennsylvania, which at all times relevant hereto has
(have) been engaged in the business of manufacturing.
9. Defendant, L.N.P. Corporation is a corporation
authorized and existing pursuant to the laws of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania having a principal place of business at S. Bailey
Road, Thorndale, Chester County, Pennsylvania, which at'all times
relevant hereto has been engaged in the business of
manufacturing.
10. Defendant, Inland Pumping & Dredging Corporation is a
Pennsylvania corporation with an address for the purpose of
200941
service of process as 138 West Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown,
Chester County, Pennsylvania, which at all times relevant hereto
did consign, assign, sell and trust, give, transfer, discharge,
dump or dispose, or authorize the same, waste of various kinds
and characters upon the ground site known as Blosenski Dump.
11. Defendant, Barney Burnhouse, is an adult individual
with an unknown address who was last believed to live in Chester,
Pennsylvania, who did consign, assign, sell and trust, give,
transfer, discharge, dump or dispose, or authorize the same,
wastes of various kinds and characters upon the ground site known
as Blosenski Dump.
12. This action involves the discharge, by the Defendants
of toxic chemicals including but not limited to,
trichloroethylene and/or tetrachlorethylene, tetrofluroethelene
and trichlorofluromethane under the conditions and according to
the facts as more fully set forth below.
13. Trichlorethylene (hereinafter referred to as TCE), when
exposed to heat or open flame, decomposes and forms phosgene gas
which is toxic and potentially deadly to human beings as well as
forming caustic hydrochloric acids.
14. TCE, when inhaled or ingested by human beings or when
put in contact with human skin, causes various effects, including
but not limited to headaches, visual disturbances, dizziness,
disturbed gait, general picture of drunkenness, unconsciousness,
nose and throat irritations, the binding of TCE with tissue
200942
ORIGINAL(Red)
macromolecules such as DNA, hepatic microsomal proteins, etc.,
damage to the liver and kidneys, carcinogenisis, or death.
15. Certain of the health effects caused by TCE are
irreversible and are likely to become life threatening, even
after exposure has ceased.
16. TCE is a "hazardous waste" within the meaning of the
Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management Act, See Pa. Code Section
75.261. It is also listed in the latest edition of the "Registry
of Toxic Effects of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) which
indicates that "the substance has the documented potential of
being harmful is misused and care must be exercised to prevent
tragic consequences."
17. At all times relevant hereto, Plaintiffs' water supply
for both potable water used otherwise in the Plaintiffs' everyday
life has come from wells situated on Plainitffs1 propertly which
are fed or draw upon the subsurface water that comes from the
Blosenski Dump site.
COUNT IALL PLAINTIFFS vs. JOSEPH BLOSENSKI, JR. and ADA BLOSENSKI,HIS WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY and t/a BLOSENSKI DISPOSAL SERVICE
18. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 17 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
19. For a period throughout the 1970's and possibly up to
the present the Defendants, Joseph Blosenski, Jr. and Ada
200943
Blosenski, his wife, t/a Blosenski Disposal Service and/or their
agents, servants, workmen or employees, dumped, spread, burned,
deposited and/or disposed of certain solid and/or liquid waste
materials which constituted hazardous waste materials as defined
by relevant Stated and Federal Statutes/ from industrial,
commerical, agricultural, residential and/or other sources on,
over and in the ground on the site known as and hereinafter
referred to as "Blosenski Dump" on or about Route 340 in West
Cain Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania, to which legal
and/or equitable title was held since May 26, 1971 by Joseph
Blosenski, Jr. and Ada Blosenski, his wife, which wastes
contained carcinogenic substances, toxic substances and/or
substances deleterious to the health of Plaintiffs and
deleterious to the health of the public, including but not
limited to substances known as trichloroethylene and/or
tetrachlorethylene, tetrafluroethelene and trichlorofluromethane.
20. Joseph Blosenski and Ada Blosenski, h/w, individually
and jointly by the entireties and-tr^a Blosenski Disposal Service,
acting individually and/or by his, her or its agents, servants,
workmen or employees have (has) acted in an intentional,
negligent, reckless, ultrahazardous, unreasonable and/or illegal
manner in that he, she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land;
(b) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
water in water courses, thus-causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well;200344
ORIGINAL(Red)(c) Failed to have the necessary permits and/or
licenses required under various Acts of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for burning, dumping, spreading, depositing and/or
disposing of certain solid and/or liquid waste materials from
industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
(d) Invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act •(k) Violated the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(1) Violated the Federal Act known as the Resource
Conservation Recovery Act.
200345
21. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid,' the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT IIALL PLAINTIFFS VS. JOSEPH BLOSENSKI, JR. and ADA BLOSENSKI,HIS WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY and t/a BLOSENSKI DISPOSAL SERVICE
NUISANCE
22. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each allegation
contained in Paragraphs 1 through 21 as though the same were set
forth at length herein.
23. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes are causing or contributing to the
pollution.
24. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs' rights common to the general
public, including the rights to potable water, clean air and good
health.
25. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
200346
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT IIIALL PLAINTIFFS vs. JOSEPH BLOSENSKI, JR. and ADA BLOSENSKI,HIS WIPE, INDIVIDUALLY and t/a BLOSENSKI DISPOSAL SERVICE
ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
26. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 25 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
27. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore
alleged, including inter a1ia bringing or permitting industrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and
aonormally dangerous activity in that:
(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would oe
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried on
in a residential neighborhood.
28. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages .as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
200947
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT IVALL PLAINTIFFS VS. JOSEPH BLOSENSKI, JR. and ADA BLOSENSKI,HIS WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY and t/a BLOSENSKI DISPOSAL SERVICE
STRICT LIABILITY
29. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 28 as though the
same were set forth at length herein..
30. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section 402(A)
of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
31. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT VALL PLAINTIFFS V. PERRY PHILLIPS and JEANNE PHILLIPS/ h/w,
INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY BY THE ENTIRETIES
32. Plaintiffs incorporate herein by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 31 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
10 200948
33. For a period throughout the 1950's until approximately
1971, the Defendant, Perry Phillips and Jeanne Phillips, his wife
and/or agents, servants, workmen, or employees dumped, spread,
burned, deposited and/or disposed of certain solid and/or liquid
waste materials which constituted hazardous waste materials as
defined by relevant state and Federal Statutes/ from industrial,
commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other sources on,
over and in the ground on the site presently known as hereinafter
referred to as Blosenski's Dump on or about Route 340 in West
Cain Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania/ to which legal
and/or equitable title was held during said period by Perry
Phillips and Jeanne Phillips, his wife, which wastes contained
carcinogenic substances, toxic substances and/or substances
deleterious to the health of Plaintiffs and deleterious to the
health of the public, including but not limited to substances
known as trichloroethylene and/or tetrachlorethylene,
tetrofluroethelene, and trichlorofluromethane.
34. Perry Phillips and Jeanne Phillips, h/w, individualy
and jointly by the entireties acting individually and/or by his,
her or its agents, servants, workmen or employees have (has
acted in an intentional, negligent, reckless, ultrahazardous,
unreasonable and/or illegal manner in that he, she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land;
(b) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
'water in water courses, thus causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well;200949
11
(c) Failed to have the necessary permits and/or
licenses required under various Acts of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for burning, dumping, spreading, depositing and/or
disposing of certain solid and/or liquid waste materials from
industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
(d) Invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act;
(k) Violated the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(1) Violated the Federal Act known as the Resource
Conservation Recovery Act.
20035012
35. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT VIALL PLAINTIFFS V. PERRY PHILLIPS and JEANNE PHILLIPS, h/w,
INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY BY THE ENTIRETIESNUISANCE
36. Plaintiffs incorporate herein by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraph 1 through 35 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
37. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge .as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes are causing or contributing to the
pollution.
38. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs' rights common to the general
public, including the rights to potable water, clean air and good
health.
39. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
13 200951
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT VIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. PERRY PHILLIPS and JEANNE PHILLIPS, h/W,
INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY BY THE ENTIRETIESULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
40. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 39 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
41. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore
alleged, including inter alia bringing or permitting industrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and
abnormally dangerous activity in that:
(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would be
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried on
in a residential neighborhood.
42. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
14 "00952
(Red)WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT VIIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. PERRY PHILLIPS and JEANNE PHILLIPS, h/w,
INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY BY THE ENTIRETIESSTRICT LIABILITY
43. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 42 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
44. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section 402(A)
of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
45. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT IXALL PLAINTIFFS V. THE BUDD CO., TRAILER DIV.
46. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 45 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
15 200953
47. On or about August 21, 1978, The Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources discovered that Defendant,
Budd Company, Trailer Div.; did consign/ assign, sell, entrust,
give, transfer, discharge or permit to be discharged, industrial
wastes that constituted hazardous wastes containing carcinogenic
substances, toxic substances and/or substances deleterious to the
health of the Plaintiffs and deleterious to the health of the
public, including but not limited to substances known as
trichloroethylene and/or tetrachlorethylene, tetrofluroethelene,
and trichlorofluromethane which were dumped, burned, deposited,
discharged, stored, treated, processed or disposed of at the site
known as Blosenski's Dump. Specific dates of Defendant's
activities are unknown to Plaintiffs as this information is
within Defendant's exclusive knowledge and control. Further
information is expected to be revealed during the course of
discovery.
48. The Budd Co., Trailer Div., acting individually and/or
by his, her or its agents, servants, workmen or employees have
(has) acted in an intentional, negligent, reckless,
ultrahazardous, unreasonable and/or illegal manner in that he,
she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land;
(b) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
water in water courses, thus causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well;
200954
)(c) Failed to have the necessary permits and/or
licenses required under various Acts of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for burning, dumping, spreading, depositing and/or
disposing of certain solid and/or liquid waste materials from
industrial/ commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
(d) invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to "adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act;
(k) Violated the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(1) Violated the Federal Act known as the Resource
Conservation Recovery Act.209355
17
49. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XALL PLAINTIFFS V. THE BUDD CO., TRAILER DIV.
NUISANCE
50. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 49 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
51. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes are causing or contributing to the
pollution.
52. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs' rights common to the general
public, including the rights to potable water, clean air and good
health.
53. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as-
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
is 200956
COUNT XIALL PLAINTIFFS V. THE BUDD CO., TRAILER DIV.
ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
54. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 53 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
55. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore
alleged, including inter alia bringing or permitting industrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and
abnormally dangerous activity in that:
(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would be
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried on
in a residential neighborhood.
56. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants a.s
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
19 200957
COUNT XIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. THE BUDD CO., TRAILER DIV.
STRICT LIABILITY
57. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 56 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
58. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section 402(A)
of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
59. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XIIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. I.C.I. AMERICAS, INC.
60. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 59 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
61. On or about August 21, 1978, The Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources discovered that
Defendant, I.C.I. Americas, Inc; did consign, assign, sell,
entrust, give, transfer, discharge or permit to be discharged,
industrial wastes that constituted hazardous wastes containing
20 200958
carcinogenic suostances, toxic substances and/or substances
deleterious to the health of the Plaintiffs and deleterious to
the health of the public, including but not limited to substances
known as trichloroethylene and/or tetrachlorethylene,
tetrofluroethelene, and trichlorofluoromethane which were dumped,
burned, deposited, discharged, stored, treated, processed or
disposed of at the site known as Blosenski's Dump. Specific
dates of Defendant's activities are unknown to Plaintiffs as this
information is within Defendant's exclusive knowledge and
control. Further information is expected to be revealed during
the course of discovery.
62. I.C.I. Americas, Inc. acting individually and/or by
his, her or its agents, servants, workmen or employees have (has)
acted in an intentional, negligent, reckless, ultrahazardous,
unreasonable and/or illegal manner in that he, she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land;
(b) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
water in water courses, thus causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well; r(c) Failed to have the necessary permits and/or
licenses required under various Acts of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for burning, dumping, spreading, depositing and/or
disposing of certain solid and/or liquid waste materials from
industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
21
200959
(d) Invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to '
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act;(k) Violated the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(1) Violated the Federal Act known as the Resource
Conservation Recovery Act.
63. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, co.sts and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
22
200960
COUNT XIVALL PLAINTIFFS V. I.C.I. AMERICAS, INC.
NUISANCE
64. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 63 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
65. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes are causing or contributing to the
pollution.
66. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs' rights common to the general
public, including the rights to potable water, clean air and good
health.
67. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XVALL PLAINTIFFS V. I.C.I. AMERICAS, INC.
ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
68. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 67 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
20095123
69. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore
alleged, including inter alia bringing or permitting industrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and
abnormally dangerous activity in that:
(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would be
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried on
in a residential neighborhood.
70. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XVIALL PLAINTIFFS V. I.C.I. AMERICAS, INC.
STRICT LIABILITY
71. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 70 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
24 200962
72. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section 402(A)
of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to -reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
73. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XVIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. A. JOHNSON COMPANY
74. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 73 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
75. On or about August 21, 1978, The Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources discovered that
Defendant, A. Johnson Company did consign, assign, sell, entrust,
give, transfer, discharge or permit to be discharged, industrial
wastes that constituted hazardous wastes containing carcinogenic
substances, toxic substances and/or substances deleterious to the
health of the Plaintiffs and deleterious to the health of the
public, including but not limited to substances known as
trichloroethylene and/or tetrachlorethylene, tetrofluroethelene,
and trichlorofluoromethane which were dumped, burned, deposited,
discharged, stored, treated, processed or disposed of at the site
20095325
known as Blosenski's Dump. Specific dates of Defendant's
activities are unknown to Plaintiffs as this information is
within Defendant's exclusive knowledge and control. Further
information is expected to be revealed during the course of
discovery.
76. A. Johnson Company/ acting individually and/or by his,
her or its agents, servants, workmen or employees have (has)
acted in an intentional, negligent, reckless, ultrahazardous,
unreasonable and/or illegal manner in that he, she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land;
(b) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
water in water courses, thus causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well;
(c) Failed to have the necessary permits -and/or
licenses required under various Acts of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for burning, dumping, spreading, depositing and/or
disposing of certain solid and/or liquid waste materials from
industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
(d) Invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
26 200984
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act;(k) Violated the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(1) Violated the Federal Act known as the Resource
Conservation Recovery Act.
77. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XVIIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. A. JOHNSON COMPANY
NUISANCE
78. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 77 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
2G09S5
79. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes are causing' or contributing to the
pollution.
80. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs' rights common to the general
public, including the rights to potable water, clean air and good
health.
81. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XIXALL PLAINTIFFS V. A. JOHNSON COMPANY
ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
82. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 81 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
83. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore •
alleged, including inter alia bringing or permitting industrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and
abnormally dangerous activity in that:
28
2009S6
(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would be
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried on
in a residential neighborhood.
84. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXALL PLAINTIFFS V. A. JOHNSON COMPANY
STRICT LIABILITY
85. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each and every
allegation contained in Paragraphs 1 through 84 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
86. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section 402 (A)
of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
87. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
29
200987
'°
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXIALL PLAINTIFFS V. SARTOMER CO., a/k/a SARTOMER INDUSTRIES
88. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 87 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
89. From a period of approximately 1971 until 1979 and
possibly up to the present, Sartomer Company, a/k/a Sartomer
Industries, did consign, assign, sell, entrust, give, transfer,
discharge or permit to be discharged, industrial wastes that
consituted hazardous wastes containing a carcinogenic substance,
toxic substance and/or substance deleterious to the health of the
Plaintiffs and deleterious to the health of the public, known as
trichloroethylene and/or tetrachlorethylene, tetrofluoethelene,
and trichlorofluoromethane which was dumped, burned, deposited,
discharged, stored, treated, processed or disposed of at the site
known as Blosenski's Dump. Specific dates of Defendant's
activities are unknown to Plaintiffs as this information is
within Defendant's exclusive knowledge and control. Further
information is expected to be revealed during the course of '
discovery.
90. Sartomer Co., a/k/a, Sartomer Industries, acting
individually and/or by his, her or its agents, servants, workmen
or employees have (has) acted in an intentional, negligent,
so 200938
reckless, ultrahazardous, unreasonable and/or illegal manner in
that he, she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land;
(b) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
water in water courses, thus causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well;
(c) Failed to have the necessary permits and/or
licenses required under various Acts of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for ourning, dumping, spreading, depositing and/or
disposing of certain solid and/or liquid waste materials from
industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
(d) Invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
31 200989
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act;(k) Violated.the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(.1) Violated the Federal Act known as the Resource
Conservation Recovery' Act.
91. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. SARTOMER CO., a/fc/a SARTOMER INDUSTRIES
NUISANCE
92. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 91 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
93. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes are causing- or contributing to the
pollution.
94. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs.' rights common to the general
32 . 200970
public, including the rights to potable water, clean air and good
health.
95. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXIIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. SARTOMER CO., a/k/a SARTOMER INDUSTRIES
ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACITIVTY
96. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 95 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
97. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore
alleged, including inter alia bringing or permitting industrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and
abnormally dangerous activity in that:
(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would be
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
33 200971
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried <3(Red)in a residential neighborhood. '
98. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXIVALL PLAINTIFFS V. SARTOMER CO., a/k/a SARTOMER INDUSTRIES
STRICT LIABILITY
99. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 98 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
100. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section
402(A) of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
101. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
34 20G372
ORIGINAL(Red)
COUNT XXVALL PLAINTIFFS V. L.N.P. CORPORATION
102. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 101 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
103. Defendants, L.N.P. Corporation, did consign, assign,
sell, entrust, give, transfer, discharge or permit to be
discharged, industrial wastes that consituted hazardous wastes
containing a carcinogenic substance, toxic substance and/or
substance deleterious to the health of the Plaintiffs and
deleterious to the health of the public, known as
trichloroethylene and/or tetrachlorethylene, which was dumped,
burned, deposited, discharged, stored, treated, processed or
disposed of at the site known as Blosenski's Dump. The exact
dates of these activities are within Defendant's exclusive
knowledge and control. Further information is expected to be
revealed during the course of discovery.
104. L.N.P. Corporation, acting individually and/or by
his, her or its agents, servants, workmen or employees have (has)
acted in an intentional, negligent, reckless, ultrahazardous,
unreasonable and/or illegal manner in that he, she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land/-
Co) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
water in water courses, thus causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well;
20097335
ORIGINAL(Red)
industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
(d) Invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act;
(k) Violated the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(1) Violated the Federal Act known as the , Resource .
Conservation Recovery Act.
119. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
20097441
ORIGINAL(Red)
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXXIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. INLAND PUMPING & DREDGING CORPORATION
NUISANCE
120. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 119 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
121. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes are causing or contributing to the
pollution.
122. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs' rights common to the general
public, including the rights to potable water, clean air and good
health.
123. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
20097542
ORIGINAL(Rtr
COUNT XXXIIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. INLAND PUMPING & DREDGING CORPORATION
ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
124. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 123 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
125. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore
alleged, including inter alia bringing or permitting indusbrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and
abnormally dangerous activity in that:
(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would be
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried on
in a residential neighborhood.
126. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same..
43 200976
ORIGINAL
COUNT XXXIVALL PLAINTIFFS V. INLAND PUMPING & DREDGING CORPORATION
STRICT LIABILITY
127. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 126 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
128. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section
402 (A) of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
129. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXXVALL PLAINTIFFS V. BARNEY BURNHOUSE
130. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 129 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
131. Defendant, Barney Burnhouse, did consign, assign,
sell, entrust, give, transfer, discharge or permit to be
discharged, industrial wastes that consituted hazardous wastes
containing a carcinogenic substance, toxic substance and/or
substance deleterious to the health of the Plaintiffs and
20097744
ORIGINAL(Red)
deleterious to the health of the public, known as
trichloroethylena and/or tetrachlorethylene, which was dumped,
burned, deposited, discharged, stored, treated, processed or
disposed of at the site known as Blosenski's Dump.
132. Barney Burnhouse, acting individually and/or by his,
her or its agents, servants, workmen or employees have (has)
acted in an intentional, negligent, reckless, ultrahazardbus,
unreasonable and/or illegal manner in that he, she, it or they:
(a) Invaded the Plaintiffs' interest in their private
use and enjoyment of their land;
(b) Polluted surface and/or subterranean waters or
water in water courses, thus causing pollution of Plaintiffs'
well;
(c) Failed to have the necessary permits and/or
licenses required under various Acts of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania for burning, dumping, spreading, depositing and/or
disposing of certain solid and/or liquid waste materials from
industrial, commercial, agricultural, residential and/or other
sources;
(d) Invaded the Plaintiffs' constitutional rights to
clean air, pure water and to the preservation and natural and
asthetic values of the environment;
(e) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the danger of
contamination to their water supply;
(f) Failed to warn Plaintiffs of the effects of TCE or
other hazardous carcinogenic or toxic substances to their
physical well being;
20097845
ORIGINALi Red)
(g) Failed to adequately test or inspect the Blosenski
Dump for the escape of hazardous waste onto the Plaintiff's
property;
(h) Failed to adequately regulate the disposal of
hazardous waste on the Blosenski Dump when the resulting injuries
and damages were or should have been known;
(i) Created a legal nuisance on the Plaintiffs'
property;
(j) Violated the Pennsylvania Solid Waste Management
Act;
(k) Violated the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law;
(1) Violated the Federal Act known as the Resource
Conservation Recovery Act.
133. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXXVIALL PLAINTIFFS V. BARNEY BURNHOUSE
NUISANCE
134. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 133 as though the
'same were set forth at length herein.
20097946
ORIGINAL(Red)
135. The aforesaid Defendants' discharge as heretofore
alleged constitutes a continuing public nuisance per se in that
the Defendants' wastes- are causing or contributing to the
pollution.
136. The Defendants' aforesaid discharge unreasonably
interferred with Plaintiffs' rights common to the general
public, including the rights to potable water/ clean air and good
health.
137. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every" Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXXVIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. BARNEY BURNHOUSE
ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
138. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 137 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
139. The aforesaid Defendants' conduct as heretofore
alleged, including inter alia bringing or permitting industrial
and hazardous wastes, including but not limited to, TCE to be
brought upon the Blosenski Dump site, under the circumstances
there and then existing, constitutes an ultrahazardous and. K 200980abnormally dangerous activity in that:
(Ktc(a) there was a high risk that Plaintiffs' water would be
contaminated;
(b) the likelihood of the aforementioned harm was great;
(c) the Defendants' manner of disposing of the afore-
mentioned hazardous wastes was not a matter of common usage;
(d) the Defendants' actions were inappropriately carried on
in a residential neighborhood.
140. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
COUNT XXXVIIIALL PLAINTIFFS V. BARNEY BURNHOUSE
STRICT LIABILITY
141. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference each of the
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 140 as though the
same were set forth at length herein.
142. The Defendants are strictly liable under Section
402(A) of the Restatement (2nd) of Torts for the industrial and .
hazardous wastes which they caused or allowed to reach the
Plaintiffs as previously alleged.
143. Solely as a result of the actions of the Defendants as
aforesaid, the Plaintiffs have suffered the damages as more fully
set forth hereinafter.
48 200981
ORIGINAL(Red)
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant an
amount in excess of $20,000.00 together with interest, costs and
punitive damages and bring this suit to recover the same.
DAMAGES
144. As a result of the actions and/or inactions of each
of the Defendants/ as set forth with more specificity in the
previous paragraphs of this Complaint, the wells on the
Plaintiffs' property, as aforesaid, have become polluted, the
water therefrom rendered nonusable and unsafe for use by the
Plaintiffs.
145. Solely as a result of the actions and/or inactions of
the Defendants as aforesaid, the Plaintiffs and the minor
Plaintiffs:
(a) Have ingested and inhaled toxic and/or carcinogenic
and/or hazardous suostances that the Defendants caused or allowed
to infiltrate their well and water systems and caused to
infiltrate the air that they have breathed and will breathe;
(b) Have been exposed to and caused to inhale noxious and
sickening odors in the air that they have breathed and will
breath and which odors were caused by toxic and/or carcinogenic
and/or hazardous substances;
(c) Have been or may be compelled to obtain medical
attention in an effort to diagnose their illness or condition
resulting from the said inhalation and ingestion, and upon
information believe that further diagnosis and treatment'will be
necessary in the future;
49 • 200982
ORIGINAL(Red;
(d) Have suffered headaches, dizziness and nose and throat
irritations;
(e) Have been violently shaken and have suffered severe
injuries to their bodies/- internal organs, nervous systems,
bones, cartileges, muscles, ligaments and body tissue, the extent
of which may not be known for many years, all of which may be
permanent. All injuries to Plaintiffs have not been and are not
at present medically objective or symptom producing , but consist
of forces which were sent forth within the bodies of the
Plaintiffs Dy the aforesaid actions and/or inactions of each of
the Defendants, which may cause medically objective injuries and
sumptomology in the future;
(f) Have and will continue to suffer great mental anguish,
shock, horror and fear of contracting diseases such as cancer.
146. Solely as a result of the actions and/or inactions of
the Defendants as aforesaid, Plaintiff, Irene Hartmetz suffered
a miscarriage.
147. Further, the minor Plaintiffs allege that following
the date that they will attain the age of 18 years, they will be
obliged to incur expense in connection with such medical
treatment, for the purchase of drugs and other related expenses. •
148. Further, Plaintiffs claim of each and every Defendant,
punitive damages in such an amount that would act as a deterrent
to the Defendants and others from the future commission of like
offenses and wrongs.200983
50
ORIGINAL(Red)
149. Solely as a result of the actions or inactions by the
Defendants, individually and/or his, her, its agents, servants,
workmen or employees as aforesaid, the Plaintiffs and their
property have been severely and permanently damaged in that the
value of the Plaintiffs' real estate has diminished as a result
of having nonusable water from its wells, the Plaintiffs' have
been put to considerable aggravation, cost and expense to bring
in water for their use, and the Plaintiffs will be put to
considerable aggravation, costs and expense in order to obtain
water on their property which is usable for all purposes,
including consumption. Specifically the Plaintiffs' damages
include, but are not limited to:
(a) Decreased property value - $150,000.00
(b) Water filter system installation _ $ 250.00
(c) Replacement carbon filters _ $ 45.00
LAGOY AND LYONS
BY:.ROBERT C. EWING, ESQUIREAttorney for Plaintiffs
20098451
(Red)
VERIFICATION
I vericv t^-st the facts set forth in the foregoing pleadings
are true and -j^.cir^ct to the best of my knowledge, information and
belief. I ;.-•:'.'-:•?": sn :1 chat false statements herein are made
subject t o - b'":•'.• nenalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date:JACOB HARTMETZ
2U0985
ORIGINAL(Red)
I veri:"/ ':'•.-': ':V̂ [Tar.ts set forth in the foregoing pleadings
are true a •"••'I •'•::••:•;•" V; :::io bost -O? my knowledge, information and;
belief. I u-\ i-.'/:3'::-v: "; t'-'̂ t false statements herein are mane
subject to thi- Penalties of IB Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to
unsworn fals i " •'..:;"• r. ion to authorities.
IRENE HARTMETZ
200986
ORIGINAL(Red)
VERIFICATION
I ver i cv. ...thnt the Iracbs set forth in the foregoing pleadings
are true and -; o c :: •? c t to the best of: my knowledge, information and
belief. I -.in^r-can.;! that false statements herein are rr.acle
subject to c'li-j ' penalties of IB Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to
unsworn f als i ;"; tcst.ion "to. authorities.
As the Parents and Guardiansof James Hartmetz
JACOB HARTMETZ
IRENE HARTMET
200987
ORIGINAL(Red)
VERIFICATION
I veric-Y '.".'int the facts set forth in the foregoing pleadings
are true and c'):::-'vc; to the best of my knowledge, information and
belief. I u;-vl2r:s-t-?.n:1 that false statements herein are made
subject to t:.)•-• Penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
As the Parents and Guardiansof Katherine Hartmetz
Date:JACOB HARTMETZ
_IRENE HARTMETZ
200988
ORIGINAL(Red)
VERIFICATION
I veri-;--- tVit the facts set forth in .the foregoing pleadings
are true and o^rv-sct to the best of: my knowledge, information, and
belief. I ui'.lsrstan:l thai: false statements herein are made
subject to th2 penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904, relating to
unsworn falsification to authorities.
As the Parents and Guardians. • . . ' o f H o l l y H a r t m e t z
Date:JACOB HARTMETZ
IR'ENE HARTMETZ
200989