Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of ...heritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/.../2019/01/...RACECOURSE-GRANDSTAN… · The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is significant

1

Name: Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand Hermes Number: 201829

Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of cultural heritage significance under Part 3, Division 3 of the Heritage Act 2017

Name Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand Location Sandown Park Racecourse, 591‐659 Princes Highway, Springvale Provisional VHR Number PROV H2391 Provisional VHR Categor(ies) Heritage Place Hermes Number 201829 Heritage Overlay City of Greater Dandenong, HO54 (entire racecourse site)

Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand (October 2018)

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE HERITAGE COUNCIL:

That the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand be included as a Heritage Place in the Victorian Heritage Register under the Heritage Act 2017 [Section 37(1)(a)].

ERIN WILLIAMS Acting Executive Director Recommendation Date: 10 January 2019 Advertising Period: 18 January 2019 – 18 March 2019

This recommendation report has been issued by the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria under s.37 of the Heritage Act

2017. It has not been considered or endorsed by the Heritage Council of Victoria.

2


EXTENT OF NOMINATION Date that the nomination was accepted by the Executive Director 16 July 2018 Written extent of nomination The nomination is for the whole of the building known as the Sandown Racecourse Grandstand, including the original 1960s structure and 1976 addition, with a surrounding curtilage, to the extent of 56 metres to the east and 40 metres to the north and south, and 25 metres to the west. The distances have been determined to manage setting, views and potential development of and around the significant structure. This curtilage would also take in part of the main straight of the motor racing track. The extent of nomination of the Sandown Racecourse Grandstand is shown below, with B1 as the grandstand and L1 as the curtilage. Nomination extent diagram

Is the extent of nomination the same as the recommended extent? Yes

3


RECOMMENDED REGISTRATION All of the place shown hatched on Diagram 2391 encompassing part of Lot 1 on Title Plan 710223 to the extent of 56 metres from the eastern edge of the main grandstand building, 40 metres from the northern and southern edges and 25 metres from the western edge.

The extent of registration of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand in the Victorian Heritage Register affects the whole place shown on Diagram 2391 including the land, all buildings (including the exteriors and interiors), roads, trees and landscape elements.

4


RATIONALE FOR EXTENT The recommended extent for the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand includes the entire grandstand and a curtilage.

The grandstand section encompasses the following elements:

the original 1962 grandstand

the 1976 additions to the north end

the projecting ramps on both sides, namely the new entry porch and covered betting area on the west side, and the undercroft infill at the south end of the grandstand.

A curtilage is recommended to extend 56 metres to the east, 40 metres to the north and south, and 25 metres to the west. This is to maintain the immediate setting of the building, and to preserve key views (especially its distinctive roofline on the trackside). This curtilage includes open lawns to the east side, and a portion of the actual motor race track, to assist interpretation. The western curtilage of 25 metres includes part of the 1980s public betting area. This 1980s fabric is not of cultural heritage significance in the context of the place.

It should be noted that three previous cultural heritage significance assessments of the Sandown Park Racecourse (the entire site including the racetrack) have found that:

The Racecourse is of local level significance. This has been recognised by its inclusion in the Heritage Overlay of the City of Greater Dandenong Planning Scheme (HO54).

The Grandstand if of potential state level significance.

See: City of Greater Dandenong Heritage Study and Heritage Places, 2003 David Bick, Sandown (Park) Racecourse Heritage Assessment (draft), August 2014 Lovell Chen, Sandown Racecourse, Heritage Assessment, January 2015. The Executive Director’s Recommendation is consistent with these previous reports.

5


AERIAL PHOTO OF THE PLACE SHOWING PROPOSED REGISTRATION

BACKGROUND

WHAT IS AT THE PLACE? The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand, located within the broader racecourse complex at 591‐659 Princes Highway, Springvale, is a multi‐storey brick and concrete building on an elongated plan, comprising tiered seating with cantilevered roof and enclosed space to the rear, elevated above an undercroft. This transverse section is extruded across 33 individual bays, articulated by exposed concrete piers along the west side, and projecting concrete roof beams along the east side.

WHAT IS THE HISTORY OF THE PLACE? The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand was commissioned in 1959 from architects Bogle & Banfield and built in 1960‐62. By March 1962, bays 1‐27 had been constructed and were known as the Thomas S Carlyon Stand. Motor racing began in 1962. After an interior fitout and more works horse racing commenced in 1965. The grandstand was extended by six bays to the north in 1976, with several other additions made in the 1990s.

WHO ARE THE TRADITIONAL OWNERS/REGISTERED ABORIGINAL PARTY(IES) FOR THIS PLACE? This site is part of the traditional land of the Kulin Nation.

6


STATEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE

WHAT IS SIGNIFICANT? The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand including the exposed elongated structure of concrete piers and beams, modular bays, low‐pitched butterfly roof, the cantilevered canopy with metal slat lining and massive beams that project beyond the eaves line, the low concrete balustrades to the seating area and ramps, and chequerboard pattern to the exterior cladding at the upper level of the western elevation.

HOW IS IT SIGNIFICANT? The former Sandown Park Racecourse grandstand is of architectural and aesthetic significance to the State of Victoria. It satisfies the following criterion for inclusion in the Victorian Heritage Register:

Criterion D Importance in demonstrating the principal characteristics of a class of cultural places and objects.

Criterion E Importance in exhibiting particular aesthetic characteristics.

WHY IS IT SIGNIFICANT? The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is significant at the State level for the following reasons:

The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is of architectural significance as a notable example of postwar grandstand architecture. The design is fine and innovative and the vast cantilevered roof over one uninterrupted continuous tier is striking in its simplicity and scale. The grandstand is one of the earliest of the group of Modernist grandstands built in postwar Victoria. Its architectural design is pivotal and it is a highly intact example of its class. The grandstand exhibits design characteristics which became standard, such as the accommodation of spectators in a single elongated stand without supporting vertical supports, and the provision of a wide visual field for racegoers without particular emphasis on the winning post. (Criterion D)

The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is of aesthetic significance for its sophisticated and elegant form reflective of a period of vigorous architectural experiment in postwar Melbourne. Its cantilevered roof and bold single tier articulation combine to produce a structure of dynamism and daring visual impact. The grandstand was featured on the front cover of two leading architectural journals of the day and the design was described ‘striking’ and ‘ultra‐modern’. (Criterion E)

7


RECOMMENDATION REASONS REASONS FOR RECOMMENDING INCLUSION IN THE VICTORIAN HERITAGE REGISTER [s.40] Following is the Executive Director's assessment of the place against the tests set out in The

Victorian Heritage Register Criteria and Thresholds Guidelines (2014).

CRITERION A Importance to the course, or pattern, of Victoria’s cultural history.

STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION A

The place/object has a CLEAR ASSOCIATION with an event, phase, period, process, function,

movement, custom or way of life in Victoria’s cultural history.

Plus

The association of the place/object to the event, phase, etc IS EVIDENT in the physical fabric of the

place/object and/or in documentary resources or oral history.

Plus

The EVENT, PHASE, etc is of HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE, having made a strong or influential

contribution to Victoria.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand has a clear association with the development of both horseracing and motor racing in Victoria, both of which have made a strong and influential contribution to Victoria. The association is evident in the physical fabric.

Criterion A is likely to be satisfied.

STEP 2: A BASIC TEST FOR DETERMINING STATE LEVEL SIGNIFICANCE FOR CRITERION A

The place/object allows the clear association with the event, phase etc. of historical importance to

be UNDERSTOOD BETTER THAN MOST OTHER PLACES OR OBJECTS IN VICTORIA WITH

SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME ASSOCIATION.

Executive Director’s Response Although horseracing took place at Sandown Park from the late nineteenth century, the remaining infrastructure, including the grandstand, is associated with the intensive redevelopment of the venue in the postwar era. As such, it cannot be said that the theme of horseracing is understood better at Sandown Park than it is at Melbourne’s other three major racecourses (Flemington VHR H2220, Caulfield or Moonee Valley), all of which have been in continuous use since the nineteenth century and still retain associations and infrastructure dating from the prewar era. Similarly, while motor racing took place at Sandown Park from 1962, the venue was not developed specifically for that use and it cannot be said that association can be better understood than it can at contemporaneous purpose‐built racing circuits such as Winton (1961) and Calder Park (1962), neither of which is in the VHR.

Criterion A is not likely to be satisfied at the State level.

8


CRITERION B Possession of uncommon, rare or endangered aspects of Victoria’s cultural history.

STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION B

The place/object has a clear ASSOCIATION with an event, phase, period, process, function,

movement, custom or way of life of importance in Victoria’s cultural history.

Plus

The association of the place/object to the event, phase, etc IS EVIDENT in the physical fabric of the

place/object and/or in documentary resources or oral history.

Plus

The place/object is RARE OR UNCOMMON, being one of a small number of places/objects remaining

that demonstrates the important event, phase etc.

OR

The place/object is RARE OR UNCOMMON, containing unusual features of note that were not widely

replicated

OR

The existence of the class of place/object that demonstrates the important event, phase etc is

ENDANGERED to the point of rarity due to threats and pressures on such places/objects.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park racecourse, in its entirety, has been described as the only major racecourse in the metropolitan area to be established in the twentieth century. More specifically, it can be said that the racecourse was the only one to be effectively developed from scratch in the post‐WW2 era. In this regard, it is certainly rare amongst Melbourne’s four major horseracing complexes, with the other three (at Caulfield, Flemington and Moonee Valley) all continuously occupied since the nineteenth century, subject to cyclical upgrading and expansion over many subsequent decades. While the broader racecourse complex at Sandown Park may demonstrate rarity in that sense, the Grandstand itself is not unique as an example of a postwar grandstand, either at a major horseracing (or motor racing) venue, or indeed at any other major sporting complex.

Criterion B is not likely to be satisfied.

9


CRITERION C Potential to yield information that will contribute to understanding of Victoria’s cultural history.

STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION C

The:

visible physical fabric; &/or documentary evidence; &/or

oral history, relating to the place/object indicates a likelihood that the place/object contains PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

of historical interest that is NOT CURRENTLY VISIBLE OR UNDERSTOOD.

Plus

From what we know of the place/object, the physical evidence is likely to be of an INTEGRITY and/or

CONDITION that it COULD YIELD INFORMATION through detailed investigation.

Executive Director’s Response This Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand does not have the potential to yield information that will contribute to an understanding of Victoria’s cultural heritage. Architectural and engineering drawings are available and it is unlikely that there is archaeological evidence that could reveal more about the place than is currently understood.

Criterion C is not likely to be satisfied.

CRITERION D Importance in demonstrating the principal characteristics of a class of cultural places and objects.

STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION D

The place/object is one of a CLASS of places/objects that has a clear ASSOCIATION with an event,

phase, period, process, function, movement, important person(s), custom or way of life in Victoria’s

history.

Plus

The EVENT, PHASE, etc is of HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE, having made a strong or influential

contribution to Victoria.

Plus

The principal characteristics of the class are EVIDENT in the physical fabric of the place/object.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand demonstrates the principal characteristics of a grandstand at a major sporting venue, and particularly one associated with a racecourse. It follows the typical form: tiered seating overlooking a track, with canopy roof and associated enclosed spaces to the rear. Although the building has been subject to several phases of addition, alteration and reconfiguration, the principal characteristics of the place remain evident in the physical fabric.

Criterion D is likely to be satisfied.

10


STEP 2: A BASIC TEST FOR DETERMINING STATE LEVEL SIGNIFICANCE FOR CRITERION D

The place/object is a NOTABLE EXAMPLE of the class in Victoria (refer to Reference Tool D).

Executive Director’s Response

Notable

Under the definitions provided in Reference Tool D, the place can be considered as a notable example of its class because it is both a fine example and a pivotal example.

Fine

The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand can be considered a fine example because its design characteristics are of a higher quality than those exhibited by other postwar grandstands in Victoria. Comparable facilities are other major sporting venues (including not only major racecourses but also the RAS Showgrounds, the MCG and other major football grounds) which tended to be far more utilitarian in their expression, largely due to the restrictions imposed by their locations (typically, long‐established venues with limited space for expansion, other structures in proximity, and new grandstands invariably required to be built on the footprints of earlier counterparts). Such were these limitations that, even when designed by eminent architect or firms, grandstands of the 1950s and 60s seldom explored striking architectural forms. The expansive and underdeveloped site at Sandown Park, unencumbered by such limitations, provided a rare and unprecedented opportunity for such exploration.

Pivotal

The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand can also be considered as a pivotal example, in that it encapsulated a key evolutionary stage in the development of grandstand design. In their desire to provide spectators with maximum visibility, the architects made two innovative design decisions: 1) to accommodate spectators in a single elongated and continuous tier without a narrow emphasis on the winning post (rather than the multi‐level layering of tiers that had previously characterised comparable‐scaled facilities); and 2) to articulate the roof as a bold cantilever, without the visual intrusion of vertical members to support the roof. This place was one of the earliest of the group of 1960s and 1970s grandstands in Victoria, and also the earliest to exhibit characteristics which became standard for such structures.

Intactness

The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand has been modified and extended, but overall retains a high level of intactness.

Comment

While not awarded at the time of its opening, the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand has grown in critical regard over the intervening years and both the firm of Bogle and Banfield and the building are now considered to contribute to an understanding of postwar Modernist architecture in Melbourne. The recognition of Bogle and Banfield’s work has also been slow. Total House (VHR H2329), the key element of Bogle and Banfield’s oeuvre, was not added to the VHR until 2013.

Criterion D is likely to be satisfied at the State level.

11


CRITERION E Importance in exhibiting particular aesthetic characteristics.

STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION E

The PHYSICAL FABRIC of the place/object clearly exhibits particular aesthetic characteristics.

Executive Director’s Response The physical fabric of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand exhibits particular aesthetic characteristics which demonstrate a sophistication and elegance of form associated with a period of vigorous architectural experiment during the 1950s and 1960s in Melbourne. Its precise articulation and cantilevering roof combine to produce a structure of dynamism and daring visual impact. A Japanese influence is evident in the elegant slatted canopy lining and the long, low balustrades (anticipating similar detailing at the same architects’ subsequent scheme for Total House) with heavily articulated L‐shaped concrete posts and joists that contrast with more delicate metalwork.

Criterion E is likely to be satisfied.

STEP 2: A BASIC TEST FOR DETERMINING STATE LEVEL SIGNIFICANCE FOR CRITERION E

The aesthetic characteristics are APPRECIATED OR VALUED by the wider community or an

appropriately‐related discipline as evidenced, for example, by:

critical recognition of the aesthetic characteristics of the place/object within a relevant art, design, architectural or related discipline as an outstanding example within Victoria; or

wide public acknowledgement of exceptional merit in Victoria in medium such as songs, poetry, literature, painting, sculpture, publications, print media etc.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand attracted press attention at the time of its construction. It was featured on the front cover of two leading architectural journals of the day: a perspective drawing on the cover of Architecture & Arts in 1959, and a photograph of the completed building on the cover of Foundations in 1965. The accompanying feature article in Architecture & Arts described the design as ‘striking’, while two separate reports in the Herald and Canberra Times newspapers lauded the building as ‘ultra‐modern’. In July 1960, the architects’ model was sent to Switzerland by the Department of Trade as part of the Australian exhibition at the Lausanne Fair.

Criterion E is likely to be satisfied at the State level.

12


CRITERION F Importance in demonstrating a high degree of creative or technical achievement at a particular

period.

STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION F

The place/object contains PHYSICAL EVIDENCE that clearly demonstrates creative or technical ACHIEVEMENT for the time in which it was created.

Plus

The physical evidence demonstrates a HIGH DEGREE OF INTEGRITY.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand demonstrates creative achievement for the time in which it was created. Many of its most prominent architectural features, such as the low‐pitched butterfly roof, cantilevered canopy with slatted lining and projecting beams, boldly expressed structure and distinctive chequerboard façade panels, had never before been seen in the design of a grandstand, or indeed in any major public building of this scale. While the building has been subject to alterations and additions since 1962, it still demonstrates integrity.

Criterion F is likely to be satisfied.

STEP 2: A BASIC TEST FOR DETERMINING STATE LEVEL SIGNIFICANCE FOR CRITERION F

The nature &/or scale of the achievement is OF A HIGH DEGREE or ‘beyond the ordinary’ for the

period in which it was undertaken as evidenced by:

critical acclaim of the place/object within the relevant creative or technological discipline as an outstanding example in Victoria; or

wide acknowledgement of exceptional merit in Victoria in medium such as publications and print media; or

recognition of the place/object as a breakthrough in terms of design, fabrication or construction techniques; or

recognition of the place/object as a successful solution to a technical problem that extended the limits of existing technology; or

recognition of the place/object as an outstanding example of the creative adaptation of available materials and technology of the period.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand was one of many places in Victoria which represent an era of creative and technological innovation in Victoria, Australia and internationally. In this context, its creative qualities are not of a ‘high degree’ or ‘beyond the ordinary’ for the period in which it was undertaken. Lovell Chen notes that its underlying design principles look back to architecture of the 1950s. The cantilevered structural beams, extending unsupported for more than 20 metres provide a degree of structural daring recalling the work of Melbourne architects through the 1950s. Criterion F is not likely to be satisfied at the State level.

13


CRITERION G

Strong or special association with a particular community or cultural group for social, cultural or

spiritual reasons. This includes the significance of a place to indigenous people as part of their

continuing and developing cultural traditions.

STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION G

Evidence exists of a DIRECT ASSOCIATION between the place/object and a PARTICULAR COMMUNITY

OR CULTURAL GROUP.

(For the purpose of these guidelines, ‘COMMUNITY or CULTURAL GROUP’ is defined as a sizable

group of persons who share a common and long‐standing interest or identity).

Plus

The ASSOCIATION between the place/object and the community or cultural group is STRONG OR

SPECIAL, as evidenced by the regular or long‐term use of/engagement with the place/object or the

enduring ceremonial, ritual, commemorative, spiritual or celebratory use of the place/object.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand does not have a strong or special association with a particular community or cultural group for social, cultural or spiritual reasons.

Criterion G is not likely to be satisfied.

CRITERION H Special association with the life or works of a person, or group of persons, of importance in Victoria’s history. STEP 1: A BASIC TEST FOR SATISFYING CRITERION H

The place/object has a DIRECT ASSOCIATION with a person or group of persons who have made a

strong or influential CONTRIBUTION to the course of Victoria’s history.

Plus

The ASSOCIATION of the place/object to the person(s) IS EVIDENT in the physical fabric of the

place/object and/or in documentary resources and/or oral history.

Plus

The ASSOCIATION:

directly relates to ACHIEVEMENTS of the person(s) at, or relating to, the place/object; or

relates to an enduring and/or close INTERACTION between the person(s) and the place/object.

Executive Director’s Response The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand has a direct association with its architects Bogle & Banfield, a productive and noted postwar architectural practice. This direct association is evident in the physical fabric of the place, in documentary evidence, and in oral history. While an important

14


firm, Bogle & Banfield did not make a strong or influential contribution to the wider course of Victoria’s history. The architectural achievements of Bogle and Banfield can be more appropriately recognised by way of Criteria D and E.

Criterion H is not likely to be satisfied.

15


PROPOSED PERMIT POLICY Preamble The purpose of the Permit Policy is to assist when considering or making decisions regarding works to a registered place. It is recommended that any proposed works be discussed with an officer of Heritage Victoria prior to making a permit application. Discussing proposed works will assist in answering questions the owner may have and aid any decisions regarding works to the place. The extent of registration of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand in the Victorian Heritage Register affects the whole place shown on Diagram 2391 including the land, all buildings (exteriors and interiors), roads, trees, landscape elements and other features. Under the Heritage Act 2017 a person must not remove or demolish, damage or despoil, develop or alter or excavate, relocate or disturb the position of any part of a registered place or object without approval. It is acknowledged, however, that alterations and other works may be required to keep places and objects in good repair and adapt them for use into the future. If a person wishes to undertake works or activities in relation to a registered place or registered object, they must apply to the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria for a permit. The purpose of a permit is to enable appropriate change to a place and to effectively manage adverse impacts on the cultural heritage significance of a place as a consequence of change. If an owner is uncertain whether a heritage permit is required, it is recommended that Heritage Victoria be contacted. Permits are required for anything which alters the place or object, unless a permit exemption is granted. Permit exemptions usually cover routine maintenance and upkeep issues faced by owners as well as minor works or works to the elements of the place or object that are not significant. They may include appropriate works that are specified in a conservation management plan. Permit exemptions can be granted at the time of registration (under s.38 of the Heritage Act) or after registration (under s.92 of the Heritage Act). It should be noted that the addition of new buildings to the registered place, as well as alterations to the interior and exterior of existing buildings requires a permit, unless a specific permit exemption is granted. Overview of cultural heritage significance The cultural heritage significance of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand relates to its architectural and aesthetic expression: its scale and length, form and detail. The expressed cantilevering roof form and repetition of clearly articulated, simple, elegant architectural elements, including projecting beams, and features are central to the expression of the building. Other key elements of the exterior include the framing, concrete panels, cantilevering roof, ramps and concourses. The six bays at the north end, added in 1976, echo the modular and structural expression of the original section, albeit with contrasting materials and finishes.

Additions have been made to the eastern side in the 1990s, namely the new entry porch, undercroft infill and covered betting ring, and the interior of the grandstand, which has been much remodelled since the original 1964‐65 fitout.

Conservation management plans Reference should be made to the Sandown Racecourse Conservation Management Plan, 2017 by Lovell Chen.

16


Other approvals Please be aware that approval from other authorities (such as local government) may be required to undertake works.

PROPOSED PERMIT EXEMPTIONS (UNDER SECTION 38 OF THE HERITAGE ACT) It should be noted that Permit Exemptions can be granted at the time of registration (under s.38 of the Heritage Act). Permit Exemptions can also be applied for and granted after registration (under s.92 of the Heritage Act). General Condition 1 All exempted alterations are to be planned and carried out in a manner which prevents damage to the fabric of the registered place or object. General Condition 2 Should it become apparent during further inspection or the carrying out of works that original or previously hidden or inaccessible details of the place or object are revealed which relate to the significance of the place or object, then the exemption covering such works shall cease and Heritage Victoria shall be notified as soon as possible. General Condition 3 All works should ideally be informed by Conservation Management Plans prepared for the place. The Executive Director is not bound by any Conservation Management Plan, and permits still must be obtained for works suggested in any Conservation Management Plan. General Condition 4 Nothing in this determination prevents the Heritage Council from amending or rescinding all or any of the permit exemptions. General Condition 5 Nothing in this determination exempts owners or their agents from the responsibility to seek relevant planning or building permits from the relevant responsible authority, where applicable. Specific Permit Exemptions The grandstand, due to its unusual construction method, has a number of specific maintenance issues. Any maintenance on the grandstand should refer to original drawings to inform an understanding of the construction of the structure. Maintenance challenges primarily relate to the unusual form, detailing and construction of the roof. Repair and maintenance

The repair, maintenance or replacement of missing, damaged or deteriorated fabric that is beyond further maintenance, with material that matches the existing fabric in form, material and method of affixing, and does not involve damage to or the removal of significant fabric. Note: This exemption is not intended to allow for the cumulative replacement of large amounts of the fabric of an item. A permit will be required if the replacement of large amounts of fabric is necessary. If there is uncertainty about the requirement for a permit, advice should be sought from Heritage Victoria.

Maintenance, replacement and installation of building and essential services.

Removal, replacement, repairs to existing safety barriers and universal/disability access structures.

17


Replacement of existing building and essential services including cabling, plumbing, wiring and fire services that uses existing routes, conduits or voids, and does not involve damage to or the removal of significant fabric.

Maintenance and replacement of mechanical plant that uses that uses existing routes, conduits or voids, and does not involve damage to or the removal of significant fabric.

Painting of previously painted elements.

Cleaning including the removal of surface deposits, organic growths, or graffiti by the use of low pressure water and natural detergents and mild brushing and scrubbing.

Vermin control activities provided the works do not adversely affect heritage fabric. Note: Any new materials used in relation to the above permit exemptions must not exacerbate the decay of existing fabric due to chemical incompatibility, obscure existing fabric or limit access to existing fabric for future maintenance. Repair and maintenance must maximise protection and retention of fabric and include the conservation of existing details or elements. Surface patina which has developed on the fabric may be an important part of the item's significance and if so needs to be preserved during maintenance and cleaning. Interiors

Removal of internal fabric, fittings and fixtures which do not impact on the structural elements of the building in the following areas: kitchens, bar, restaurant, betting fit‐out and crowd amenities areas, toilets and the enclosed areas beneath the undercroft. This does not include the original tote building housed in the undercroft.

Public safety and security

Emergency stabilisation works necessary to secure safety where a site feature has been irreparably damaged or destabilised and represents a safety risk. Urgent or emergency site works are to be undertaken by an appropriately qualified specialist such as a structural engineer, or other professional or tradesperson with appropriate heritage experience. The Executive Director must be notified within seven days after the works.

General maintenance for the purposes of safety and security including the removal of broken glass, the temporary shuttering of windows and covering of holes as long as this work is reversible and does not damage the cultural heritage significance.

Events The installation/erection of temporary structures as part of an event (racing or other) of up to

three months duration (including assembly and disassembly), where any affected areas are made good to match the condition prior to the installation of the temporary elements. The structures should not be located in a place where they damage any fabric. The assembly and disassembly process should not damage any fabric.

Non‐structural alterations to all existing promotional elements.

The introduction of temporary security fencing, scaffolding, hoardings or surveillance systems to prevent unauthorised access or secure public safety for a maximum period of six months after which they will be removed, and the structures are not located in a place where they could damage any fabric. The structures should not be located in a place where they damage any fabric. The assembly and disassembly process should not damage any fabric.

18


Landscape

• The process of gardening, including mowing, removal of dead shrubs and replanting, disease and weed control, and maintenance to care for existing plants.

• The removal of dead or dangerous trees and emergency tree works to maintain safety. • Repairs, conservation, and maintenance to hard landscape elements, such as steps, paths,

gutters, drainage and irrigation systems, edging, fences and gates. • Management of trees in accordance with Australian Standard; Pruning of Amenity Trees AS

4373‐1996. • Management of trees in accordance with Australian Standard; Protection of Trees on

Development Sites AS 4970‐2009. • Removal of plants listed as noxious weeds in the Catchment and Land Protection Act 1994. • Vegetation protection and management of possums and vermin. Racetrack works

• All works to racetracks to ensure their functioning and safety for racing purposes in their current form.

Car park areas

• Repairs and maintenance work to asphalted car park surfaces and associated non‐original fencing

• All works to, including demolition of, brick toilet block in car park to north of grandstand Other structures • Repairs, maintenance and removal of, non‐original entry arrangement (in the vicinity of bays

13‐15), including escalators and stairs. • Repairs, maintenance and removal of, the late twentieth century space frame structure over

the betting area (west of bays 1‐12), so long as there is no impact on the grandstand.

RELEVANT INFORMATION Local Government Authority City of Greater Dandenong Heritage Overlay Yes (HO54) Heritage Overlay Controls External Paint: Yes

Internal Alteration: No Tree: No

Other Overlays No Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register No Other Listings No Other Names Thomas S Carlyon Stand

HISTORY

Origins of the Sandown Park Racetrack (1888‐1948)

The first horseracing track at Sandown Park was located at the railway station end of the present‐day racecourse and was smaller. Opening in 1888 it was privately owned and originally named ‘Oakleigh Park Racecourse’. In 1891, this place was sold to the Victorian Trotting Club and was renamed ‘Sandown Park Racecourse’, after the famous track in England. Sandown Park was initially used for horse racing only. However, with the increase in popularity in motor cars in the early twentieth century, the first car race in Australia was held at the track in 1904. Horse racing was held

19


here until 1931, when the Victorian government decided to reduce the number of metropolitan racecourses, closing Sandown Park amongst others.

The Present Sandown Park Racetrack (1948)

The current layout and operation of Sandown Racecourse has its basis in the horse racing reforms undertaken by the State Government in the 1940s, which resulted in tighter regulation of race days and the closure of further suburban racecourses. In 1948, Sandown Park was designated as one of four racecourses (along with those at Flemington, Caulfield and Moonee Valley) where horse racing would be permitted. At the time, the site comprised two racetracks, two grandstands (c.1880s), stables, ancillary buildings and fenced lawns and gardens and lawns. The upgrading of these outdated facilities became a major priority.

Redevelopment of the racecourse (1956‐65)

Sandown Racecourse was redeveloped between 1956 and 1965. In 1955, the government approved the Melbourne Racing Club (MRC) laying a new horse race track at Sandown. The horse racing track was designed by HJ Wagstaff, who had a long history with the design of racecourses. By 1958 the main racecourse track had been set out and a dam had been constructed. In July 1959 the MRC had approved plans for an ‘ultra‐modern grandstand’ at Sandown Park. It engaged architects Bogle & Banfield to prepare a masterplan. As this scheme unfolded during 1959, MRC chairman Thomas Carlyon embarked upon a study tour of racecourses in Manila, Hong Kong, Japan, Bangkok and Singapore, noting that ‘any additional features which he sees designed for the benefit of the racing community will be incorporated into the Sandown Park plans’. Although the site was initially proposed solely as a horse‐racing venue, by the early 1960s there was a push for inclusion of motor racing facilities. It has been suggested that motor racing was incorporated as a way for the MRC to quickly generate additional income from the site. Motor racing had been a ‘minority sport’ through the interwar period, but during the postwar period, as the accessibility of motor cars increased, the popularity of motor racing grew significantly.

A new grandstand (1959‐62)

In July 1960, with development of the site underway, Bogle & Banfield’s grandstand model was sent to Switzerland by the Department of Trade as part of the Australian exhibition at the Lausanne Fair. The grandstand was still under construction in late 1961, when the Age published a photograph of it being inspected by a group of visiting international jockeys that included England’s Lester Piggott.

The grandstand was sited to the west of the main straight of the racetrack, with pedestrian entry ramps on the western side. As designed, the stand featured rows of timber seating fixed on stepped concrete slabs with pedestrian ramp access from the lawn area at the front of the stand. Behind the seating was a concourse area with refreshment facilities, with the open undercroft below the seating incorporating tote windows, toilets, bars and snack bars. The jockeys and racecourse facilities were also located on this level. Photographs of the early 1960s show open courts located at the northern and southern ends of the stand.

The Sandown Park grandstand, built on a large site unencumbered by restrictions, allowed the architects free rein to conceive a structure of uncommonly elongated form, accommodating spectators across a single continuous tier (in contrast to the typical multi‐level tier system), without a narrow visual focus on the winning post.

20


Bogle & Banfield, architects The architectural partnership of Bogle & Banfield was formed in 1955 by Alan Bogle (1902‐1976) and Gordon Banfield (1922‐2007). During its heyday in the late 1950s and 1960s, Bogle, Banfield & Associates became best known for high‐profile mixed‐use buildings in central Melbourne, such as the Total House Carpark (1963‐64), Palladium Entertainment Centre (1964), Mid City Cinemas, Bourke Street (1977) and St Vincent's Private Hospital (1972), Gypsum House, La Trobe Street (1968) as well as a broad range of projects including retail premises, warehouses, factories and houses. The 1960 working drawings for the Sandown Racetrack Grandstand bear the initials of various staff members. There is evidence that Bernard Joyce was the designer. He subsequently designed a racecourse grandstand in Malaysia and won first prize in an international design competition in 1964.

Grandstand Opening 1962 The grandstand and motor racing course were officially opened by the Lord Mayor, Cr Maurice Nathan, on 11 March 1962, with a crowd of 100,000 attending the first two days of motor racing. At the time, it was stated that the grandstand (reported to accommodate 8,000 people) would be known as the Thomas S Carlyon Stand, after the MRC chairman. Although officially opened, work had not yet started on its interior fitout and outbuildings. When this work commenced in 1964, it was undertaken by Mussen & Mackay in association with Trevor Evans & Associates. Horse racing at the new racecourse commenced in 1965, when Sandown Racecourse was officially opened by the Premier of Victoria, Henry Bolte on 19 June 1965. By 1965, the open courts (where large areas had been left open in the roof) had been covered and open ramped seating (bays 28 to 33) had been constructed at the northern end of the grandstand.

Later changes (1970s onwards)

In 1976, the grandstand was extended to the north. This extension, designed by Reg Grouse Pty Ltd Architects, included two upper levels which incorporate the Victory bar with the Leger bar at concourse level above. New sections of the grandstand covered open tiered seating which had existed in this section of the site since 1964. An interstate betting ring and bar was also constructed to the west of the grandstand as part of these works. In 1994, further works were undertaken to the grandstand, including the construction of a new entrance at bays 13‐15. In 1997, the southern end of the undercroft was gutted and infilled to create a large enclosed members’ area. This work was undertaken by architectural firm of Grouse Fleming Bate (a latter incarnation of the office of Reg Grouse, who did the 1976 additions) and was officially opened on 15 November 1997. The covered area, over the betting ring, was added around the same time. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Architect name: Bogle, Banfield & Associates Architectural style name: Post War Modernist Builder name: Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd Construction started date: 1960 Construction ended date: 1962

21


VICTORIAN HISTORICAL THEMES

09 Shaping cultural and creative life 9.1 Participating in sport and recreation 9.3 Achieving design and artistic distinction

PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION

Overall form The Sandown Park Grandstand is rectangular in plan and is approximately 300 metres in length. The building comprises a single tier of stepped trackside seating, with enclosed space to the rear (elevated above an undercroft) and a low asymmetrical butterfly roof extending to form a canopy over the seating area. The building comprises 33 individual bays. The original section comprises 27 bays and the six bays at the northern end were added in 1976. East Side The east side faces the track and is dominated by the cantilevered roof canopy with exposed beams along the upper side (rather than the underside) of the roof plane. The beams to the original grandstand are of reinforced concrete, while those to the 1976 portion are of steel I‐beams. All beams project beyond the eaves line, while the underside of the canopy is lined with metal channels that run parallel to the roof beams. The seating area is elevated on concrete piers. Stepped concrete slabs mounted with timber bench seating in rows extend to the rear, with aisles between. Concrete ramps provide access to ground level and between each pair, a second ramp provides access to the undercroft area. Open or enclosed bays are located at the top of the seating area. Bay 13 incorporates the glass‐walled VIP box and only Bays 1 and 2 retain original multi‐paned window walls. West Side Along the building’s west side, the bays are defined by the fin‐like structure of vertical concrete columns and exposed roof beams. Bays 3, 21, 27 and 33 have concrete ramps up to mezzanine circulation areas below the main level. Bays 12, 27 and 33 incorporate lift shafts. The 1994 public entrance spans bays 13‐15 and comprises a curved ramp up to an open terrace, elevated on circular concrete columns, with a hip‐roofed glass‐fronted entry porch, a racing office, and staircases and escalators. South of the porch, an area with a space‐framed roof (the betting ring) extends to the south end of the building. On the east side, upper level bays 1‐12 and 19‐23 have a vertical ribbed cladding and rows of small windows. Bays 1‐12 also retain the chequerboard pattern. Bays 16‐18 and 24‐26 incorporate recessed balconies with solid balustrades in a matching ribbed finish. Bays 28‐32 have painted brickwork and elongated hit‐and‐miss grilles at the upper level, and a smooth concrete finish and canted bay windows at the lower level. The undercroft extends the full length of the building and is double‐height in the 1962 section and single‐height at the 1976 end. From bays 15 to 27, the undercroft is unobstructed and incorporates brick structures for offices, workshops, toilets and tote facilities.

22


Location of main exterior elements at the place.

INTERIORS

While not every interior space was inspected during the site visit in October 2018, a viewing of the major public spaces and a selection of smaller semi‐public areas (toilets, kitchens, etc) suggests that very little remains of the original fitout in the 1960s part of the grandstand.

The major public spaces generally retain their open‐planned form, with stepped floors and ceilings following the butterfly roof profile. Many spaces have ceilings of plain or perforated acoustic tile (likely to date from the 1960s/70s), but none retains the original textured ceiling tiles in a chequerboard pattern. Some semi‐open areas, such as circulation lobbies and leger area, have ceilings lined with metal slats, matching the canopy underside. Floors generally have dark‐coloured carpet or carpet tiles, while some toilets and kitchens retain original vinyl tiles. Otherwise, little seem to remain of the 1960s fitout. The timber tote counters, bar and railings in the Vo Rogue Room and Samson Room may also be original, but other bars, serveries, etc are of much later date. The doorway to the original liftshaft (Bay 12) retains its glazed mosaic tiled surround. Nothing appears to remain of the interior design scheme, or any original loose furniture.

Conversely, the interiors of the 1976 addition generally remain intact to that period. The so‐called Vintage Room, at the lower level, retains roughly textured ceiling of sprayed vermiculate and large square ceiling‐mounted lightboxes with diffusing screens of suspended plastic panels. Upstairs, the Leger Bar has a ceiling of metal slats, with recessed fluorescent lights subtly integrated.

23


LANDSCAPES, TREES & GARDENS

The open space between the grandstand and the racetrack incorporates some concrete paths and paved areas, as well as two expansive lawn areas (designated as the ‘viewing lawn’ and the ‘members’ lawn’), separated by the semi‐enclosed mounting yard. The three other sides of the grandstand are generally paved in asphalt to facilitate vehicle access to the undercroft. There are a few smaller lawn areas, some with informal plantings or garden beds. A group of three clipped conifers stands alongside the brick feature walls at Bay 25.

ARCHAEOLOGY

There is no identified archaeology of State level significance at this place.

INTEGRITY/INTACTNESS

Intactness – The intactness of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is varied. The interior has been refurbished several times since the 1960s, to the point that little now remains of its original fitout. While the interiors of the 1976 addition are more intact, they are merely representative of their time rather than especially notable in their own right.

Externally, the eastern (track) side of the building remains substantially intact to its original form, with only slight changes such as the removal of one of the three original ramps at the south end, and the reconfiguration of the bay infills at the rear of the seating area. The western side of the building has been subject to more major changes, notably the partial infilling of the undercroft, the creation of a new three‐storey entry sequence, and the large space‐framed covered betting areas. The erection of the new entry sequence necessitated the removal of one of the original concrete ramps (Bay 12) and alterations to what was the original lift shaft. This shaft, and another at Bay 21, have been reclad with metal decking; the one at Bay 33 retains an off‐form concrete finish.

For the most part, other external changes are minor and reversible. They include the installation of additional metal pipe handrails to the centre of original open staircases, and the insertion of a disabled access ramp over the trackside staircase to Bay 12. (October 2018).

Integrity – The integrity of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is very good. Notwithstanding subsequent additions and alterations, the articulation and extent of the original grandstand can be readily interpreted. While the 1976 additions echoed the general form of the 1962 building (most notably, replicating the modular bay system, exposed structural grid and canopy roof), they were otherwise detailed and finished in a contrasting fashion. As such, it remains clearly apparent that it is a later addition. The additions made in the 1990s, such as the infilled undercroft, new entrance porch and covered betting ring, are arguably less sympathetic in form and detailing, but are otherwise expressed as discrete elements that do not confuse interpretation of the original building. (October 2018).

CONDITION

The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand has been well maintained and remains in very good condition, inside and out. Externally, exposed concrete structure, brickwork and external wall claddings, are in generally excellent condition. On the track side, some staining is apparent on the projecting roof beams. There is minor damage to some of the concrete ramp walls and stair treads. The metal slat linings to the canopy roof show some signs of pitting or rusting through, which is most noticeable above bays 1 and 2. Internally, staining to some of the ceiling tiles suggests that there may be some roof leaks. Recent aerial photographs of the building show that the roof cladding has rusted in some areas, especially bays 24 to 26. (October 2018).

24


COMPARISONS

There are a number of grandstands in the Victorian Heritage Register, dating from the 1870s to the 1970s.

Nineteenth Century Grandstands in the VHR

Hamilton Racing Club Grandstand, Hamilton (1873) (VHR H0137) Fitzroy Cricket Ground Grandstand, North Fitzroy (1888) (VHR H0751)

Grandstand (1895) included in the registration of Prince’s Park, Maryborough (VHR H1880)

Grandstand (1899) included in the registration of Central Park, Stawell VHR (location of the Stawell Gift) (VHR H2284).

The Hamilton Racing Club Grandstand (1873) is of architectural significance as one of the earliest surviving grandstands in Victoria. It is significant as a sophisticated example of grandstand design for this era with its turrets giving the structure a distinctive appearance.

Hamilton Racing Club Grandstand (1873)

25


Early Twentieth Century Grandstands in the VHR

Queen Elizabeth Oval Grandstand, Bendigo (1901) (VHR H0803)

Kingston Grandstand, Kingston (1902) (VHR H1300)

Camperdown Turf Club Grandstand, Camperdown (1902‐03) (VHR H2093)

Benalla Showgrounds Grandstand, Benalla (1913) (VHR H0976)

Memorial Grandstand, Winchelsea (1923) (VHR H1525)

Murray Stand 1925-6 (St Kilda Cricket Ground) (VHR H2234) Blackie Ironmonger Stand 1933-4 (St Kilda Cricket Ground) (VHR H2234) Glenferrie Oval Grandstand, Hawthorn (1938) (VHR H0890)

The Glenferrie Oval Grandstand, Hawthorn (1938) (VHR H0890) is of historic and architectural significance to the State of Victoria. The design of the grandstand in the Moderne style is unique and demonstrates the middle‐class values of the club, in contrast to the working‐class origins of most of the league clubs. The Glenferrie Grandstand is historically important in illustrating the status sought by the Hawthorn Club in the league through its Moderne design, most other league clubs favouring a traditional nineteenth century design for their grandstands.

Glenferrie Oval Grandstand, Hawthorn (1938) (VHR H0890)

26


Postwar Grandstands and Stadiums in the VHR During the postwar period, sporting crowds grew with the increase in population and economic recovery. A number of metropolitan sportsgrounds and racecourses constructed new or updated grandstands. The Olympic Games of 1956 was the catalyst for new facilities, a number of which are included in the VHR:

Olympic Swimming Stadium (1956) (VHR H1977)

Lawn Stand (1956), included in the registration of Flemington Racecourse (VHR H2220)

Social Club Stand (1959) (known as the S A Coventry Pavilion) included in the registration of Victoria Park (VHR H0075)

Sherrin Stand (1969) included in the registration of Victoria Park (VHR H0075)

New Hill Stand (1977‐79) included in the registration of Flemington Racecourse (VHR H2220)

Waverley Park Stadium, Mulgrave (1970) (VHR H1883)

The Olympic Swimming Stadium (1956) (VHR H1977) is of architectural significance as an early and influential landmark in the development of Structuralist architecture in Australia in the postwar period. The winning competition entry was acclaimed at the time as a brilliant and original design which would be influential in Australia and overseas. The former Olympic Pool is of scientific (technological) significance as an early example of pre‐tensioned steel frame construction.

Olympic Swimming Stadium (1956) (VHR H1977)

Victoria Park, Abbotsford (VHR H0075) There are two extant grandstands at Victoria Park.

The Social Club Stand (1959) (known as the SA Coventry Pavilion), designed by Robert McIntyre & Associates combines open stadium seating (for 1,250 spectators) with a four‐storey block of administrative offices, bars, functions rooms and viewing areas. During the 1980s, it was enlarged with a fourth and partial fifth storey, and later by a glass‐fronted grandstand (separately designated as the Bob Rose Stand) that cantilevered from the third floor, providing enclosed seating for 300 spectators.

27


The Sherrin Stand (1969) designed by Peter McIntyre & Associates is a steel‐framed structure with stepped concrete tier, glazed infill at each end, and a cantilevered roof on tapered steel beams. Initially providing covered seating for 1,800 spectators and 700 uncovered seats, the stand was enlarged in 1978 to provide a further 1,000 seats. Along the outer perimeter of the stand, extending 80 metres along Lulie Street, the underside of the stepped concrete tier remains exposed, while the upper level is enlivened with black and white stripes.

Sherrin Stand (1969), included in the registration of Victoria Park, Abbotsford (VHR H0075)

Waverley Park, Wellington Road, Mulgrave (VHR H1883) Waverley Park (formerly VFL Park) (VHR H1883) is of historical and architectural (and engineering) significance to the State of Victoria. Influenced by the most recent and important overseas stadia existing at that time, and by American sporting facilities, it was unique in Australia, when conceived, for its size, for its innovative and integrated design, and for its amenities. It reflects an advanced approach to stadium design in the early 1960s and the vision of Australian architect Reginald Padey in collaboration with the engineers John Connell and Associates. The high stand (the Sir Kenneth Luke Stand), designed in 1963 (built 1973‐76) is all that remains of this place.

The Sir Kenneth Luke Stand at Waverley Park, Wellington Road, Mulgrave (VHR H1883). Designed in 1963 (built 1973‐76).

28


Grandstands at the Flemington Racecourse The Flemington Racecourse has been extensively developed. There are only two heritage grandstands extant at the place. Lawn Stand (1958‐59) was designed by architects Leith & Bartlett and built on the site of the old bluestone grandstand. The structure provides rows of open air seating. It is made of reinforced concrete and includes a large open paved ‘elms area’ with a cafeteria along one side. It was officially opened for the 1959 Melbourne Cup season.

Lawn Stand (1958‐59)

(New) Hill Stand (1977‐79) was built on the site of the Old Hill Stand, completed just over two decades before. A five‐level structure, the new stand provided deck seating for almost 4,000 spectators, with an interior capacity of 10,000 and was officially opened in March 1979.

(New) Hill Stand (1977‐79)

29


Bogle & Banfield Buildings In the VHR

Total House and Carpark, 170‐190 Russell Street, Melbourne (VHR H2329) was built between 1963 to 1965. It is architecturally significant as a landmark of post‐World War II modernist design and is one of the earliest and best expressions of Brutalist architecture in Victoria. Brutalism incorporated ideas of the integrity of expression of materials, structure and function. Total House reflects these ideals in differentiating the functional parts of the building and the 'honest' display of its materials and structure. Total House is also an outstanding example of Japanese influence on architecture in Victoria in the postwar period. Until then local architects had been inspired largely by the buildings of Europe and the United States, but the innovative Brutalist concrete architecture of postwar Japan was widely admired and published in the west, and inspired Australian architects to visit Japan at this time to research its architecture and landscapes.

Total House and Carpark, 170‐190 Russell Street, Melbourne (VHR H2329).

SUMMARY OF COMPARISONS

The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is part of the history of racing and sports grandstands and stadiums in Victoria which reaches back to the nineteenth century. The postwar era saw an increase in the number of new and redeveloped sporting venues. In this context, Sandown was the only major racing venue to be developed as a cohesive complex, rather than through a process of successive redevelopments that characterised the three other courses at Flemington, Caulfield and Moonee Valley. The impressive scale and expansive architectural expression of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand can be in part attributed to the fact that the large site was virtually unencumbered by prior development. This allowed the architects, Bogle & Banfield a design degree of freedom to experiment with a sizeable elongated form of simplicity, elegance and dynamism. The only Racecourse in Victoria to be included in the Victorian Heritage Register in its entirety is the Flemington Racecourse. Although the spiritual home of horseracing in the State and the location of the Melbourne Cup, it retains little original fabric. Neither the postwar Lawn Stand nor the New Hill Stand are of sufficient architectural note to warrant individual inclusion in the VHR. These contrast

30


sharply with the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand, which holds its own architecturally and aesthetically, in a manner similar to the Olympic Swimming Stadium which predated it by three years. The (New) Hill Stand at Flemington (1977‐79) (along with the Sherrin Stand (1969), the Member’s Stand at Moonee Valley (1976‐77) and others) demonstrate the influence of the Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand, as architects of period the began to embrace the bold expression of cantilevered roofs and floating structure that had been explored nearly two decades earlier.

KEY REFERENCES USED TO PREPARE ASSESSMENT “MRC plan for £700,000 stand”, Age, 8 July 1959, p 20.

“New racecourse and grandstand for Victoria”, Architecture & Arts, August 1959, pp 38‐41.

Bogle & Banfield, “Sandown Park Racecourse”, working drawings dated Mar, Apr & May 1960. PROV.

“Lord Mayor to open circuit”, Age, 9 February 1962, p 22.

“The New Sandown Park Racecourse”, Foundations, IV, 5 (1965), pp 20‐25.

Fay Woodhouse, “Alan Bogle: A Brief Biography”, Spirit of Progress, VII, 2 (Autumn 2006), pp 10‐13.

Neil Clerehan, “Designed, built and owned landmark buildings”, Age, 5 September 2007, p14.

[obituary for architect Gordon Banfield]

Built Heritage Pty Ltd, “Bogle & Banfield”, Dictionary of Unsung Architects, www.builtheritage.com.au

Lovell Chen, Sandown Racecourse, Heritage Assessment, January 2015.

31


ADDITIONAL IMAGES

Location map.

The Sandown Racecourse (the entire site shown in dark pink) is included in the City of Greater Dandenong Heritage Overlay (HO54).

The Grandstand is shown in light pink within this overlay.

32


General view of the grandstand from east (trackside), looking south‐west.

General view of the grandstand from east (trackside), looking north‐west.

33


Detail of seating area, showing stepped concrete tier, bench seats and canopy underside.

General view of the 1962 grandstand from west (carpark side), looking north‐east.

34


General view of the grandstand from west (carpark side), looking south‐east.

General view of the 1976 additions from west (carpark side), looking north‐east.

35


New entry porch on eastern side (Bays 12‐15), added in 1994.

Typical interior.

36


General view of undercroft area, showing exposed structure and low‐rise infill.

Original tote building in undercroft area (north end), showing hatch‐like windows.

37


HISTORICAL IMAGES

Perspective of Bogle & Banfield’s original masterplan for Sandown Park Racecourse, 1959

Source: Architecture & Arts, August 1959

Perspective of Bogle & Banfield’s initial scheme for grandstand at Sandown Park Racecourse, 1959


38


Thomas Carlyon, chairman of the MRC, photographed with architects’ model of grandstand, 1959


39


The grandstand as photographed by Wolfgang Sievers, 1962

Source: Picture Collection, State Library of Victoria

The grandstand as photographed by Wolfgang Sievers, 1962


40


The grandstand (prior to interior fitout) as seen in aerial photograph by Lyle Fowler, 1963

Source: Picture Collection, State Library of Victoria.

The grandstand (prior to interior fitout) as seen in aerial photograph by Lyle Fowler, 1963

Source: Picture Collection, State Library of Victoria.

41


The grandstand in 1965, following internal fitout (note additional open bays at left end)

Source: Foundations

Views of two typical interior spaces in the grandstand, 1965 Source: Foundations

42


The west (carpark) side of grandstand, photographed in 1974 (note chequerboard façade)

Source: Bruce Trethowan, ‘Nomination of Total House…to the VHR’, January 2014

The grandstand (with 1976 additions) as seen in aerial photograph by Robert James Moss, 1981


43


Historical development of the Sandown Racetrack 1950s‐2000s. Source: Lovell Chen, CMP (2017)

Documents

Recommendation of the Executive Director and assessment of ...heritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/.../2019/01/...RACECOURSE-GRANDSTAN… · The Sandown Park Racecourse Grandstand is significant