Upload
brian-armstrong
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Recent Results from STARMarkus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
Munich, Germany
For the STAR Collaboration
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
2
Outline
• RHIC
• STAR
• Analyses– Anisotropic Flow
– Jets at RHIC
– Ultra-Peripheral Collisions
• Summary
• Outlook
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
3
The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
• Two independent accelerator rings• 3.83 km in circumference• Accelerates everything from p to Au
Running conditions: Au-Au 2001• 55-56 bunches per ring
(tested up to 110)• 7.5108 Au/bunch @ storage energy• Storage energy: 100 GeV/A• Peak luminosity: 51026 cm-2 s-1
Running conditions: pp 2001• 55 bunches per ring• 0.81011 p/bunch• Energy/beam: 100 GeV• Peak luminosity: 1.51030 cm-2 s-1
• Beam polarization ~ 25% ( AGS)Long IslandLong Island
STAR
The STAR experiment at RHIC
STAR uses the world’s largest Time Projection Chamber
One of the first Au on Au Events at CM Energy of 200 GeVA
STARSTAR
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
6
Anisotropic Flow• Look at peripheral collisions
• Overlap region is not symmetric in coordinate space
• Almond shaped overlap region– Easier for particles to emerge in the direction of x-z
plane
– Larger area shines to the side
x
yz
px
py
y
x
nvn cosx
y
p
patan
• Spatial anisotropy Momemtum anisotropy– Interactions among constituents generate a pressure
which transforms the initial spatial anisotropy into the observed momentum anisotropy
• Perform a Fourier decomposition of the momentum space particle distributions in the x-y plane
– vn is the n-th harmonic Fourier coefficient of the distribution of particles with repsect to the reaction plane
• v1: “directed flow”
• v2: “elliptic flow”
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
7
PRL 86, (2001) 402
more central
v2 vs. Centrality (130 GeV)
• v2 is large– 6% in peripheral
collisions– Smaller for central
collisions
• Hydro calculations are in reasonable agreement with the data
– In contrast to lower collision energies where hydro over-predicts anisotropic flow
• Anisotropic flow is developed by rescattering
– Data suggests early time history
– Quenched at later timesAnisotropic transverse flow is large at RHIC
Hydro predictions
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
8
v2 vs. pt and Particle Mass (130 GeV)
• The mass dependence is reproduced by hydrodynamic models– Hydro assumes local
thermal equilibrium
– At early times
– Followed by hydrodynamic expansion
PRL 86, 402 (2001) & nucl-ex/0107003
Hydro does a surprisingly good job
D. Teaney et al., QM2001 Proc.P. Huovinen et al., nucl-th/0104020
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
9
v2 for High pt Particles (130 GeV)
• pQCD inelastic energy loss + parameterized hydro component (M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev and X.N. Wang, PRL 86 (2001) 2537)
– value of v2 at high pt sensitive to the initial gluon density
– saturation and decrease of v2 as a function of pt at higher pt
• data starts to deviate from hydrodynamics at pt > 2 GeV/c
Adler et al., nucl-ex/0206006
Data is in qualitative agreement
with ‘jet-quenching’ scenario
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
10
Centrality dependence of v2(pt)
• v2 is saturated at high pt and it does not come back down as rapidly as expected
• What does v2 do at very high pt ?
200 GeV (preliminary)
130 GeV
peripheral
central
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
11
v2 up to 12 GeV/c
v2 seems to remain saturated
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
12
Hard Probes in Heavy-Ion Collisions• New opportunity using Heavy Ions at RHIC Hard Parton Scattering
sNN = 200 GeV at RHIC – 17 GeV at CERN SPS
• Jets and mini-jets – 30-50 % of particle production– High pt leading particles– Azimuthal correlations
• Extend into perturbative regime– Calculations reliable (?)
• Scattered partons propagate through matter &radiate energy (dE/dx ~ x) in colored medium
– Interaction of parton with partonic matter– Suppression of high pt particles: “jet quenching”– Suppression of angular correlations
hadrons
q
q
hadronsleadingparticle
leading particle
schematic view of jet production
QGP
Vacuum
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
13
Jets in Hadronic Collisions
p+p jet+jet (STAR@RHIC)
Au+Au ??? (STAR@RHIC)
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
14
Identifying jets on a statistical basis in Au-Au
• Given a trigger particle with pt > pt (trigger), associate particles with pt > pt (associated)
• Au+Au– flow
• p+p and Au+Au collisions:– dijets– momentum
conservation– jets – resonances
STAR Preliminary Au+Au @ 200 GeV/c, 0-5% most central
4 < pt(trig) < 6 GeV/c, 2 < pt(assoc.) < pt(trig)
Small
All
),()(11
)(2 NdefficiencyN
Ctrigger
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
15
Peripheral Au+Au data vs. pp+flow
C2(Au Au) C2(p p) A *(1 2v22 cos(2))
Ansatz: A high pt triggered Au+Au event is a superposition of a high pt triggered p+p event plus anisotropic transverse flow
v2 from reaction plane analysis
“A” is fit in non-jet region (0.75 < || < 2.24)
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
16
Central Au+Au data vs. pp+flow
C2(Au Au) C2(p p) A *(1 2v22 cos(2))
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
17
Jets at RHIC
• The backward going jet is missing in central Au-Au collisions when compared to p-p data + flow
• Other features of the data– High pt charged hadrons dominated by jet
fragments• Relative charge• Azimuthal correlation width• Evolution of jet cone azimuthal correlation
strength with centrality?
Surface emission?
Suppression of back-to-back correlations in central Au+Au collisions
• Other explanations for the disappearance of back-to-back correlations in central Au-Au?
– Investigate nuclear kT effects
• Experiment: p+Au or d+Au
• Theory: Add realistic nuclear kT to the models
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
18
Ultra-Peripheral Collisions
• b > 2RA;
– no hadronic interactions– <b> ~ 20-60 fermi at RHIC
• Ions are sources of fields– Fields couple coherently to ions
• pt < h/RA, ~30 MeV/c for heavy ions
• p|| < h/RA ~ 3 GeV/c at RHIC
• Photonuclear (Photon-Pomeron) Interactions
A ’, , , J/,… A – Vector Meson Dominance
• A ’ qqA ’ (elastic scattering) ’ VA
– ~ 350 mb at 130 GeV/nucleon• 5% of AuAu(had.)
• Electromagnetic particle production
’leptons, mesons– Strong Field (nonperturbative?) QED
Au
Au
Coupling ~ nuclear form factor
, P, or meson
-
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
19
Exclusive 0
pt<0.15 GeV
0 pt
Signal region:
pt<0.15 GeV
200GeV
Preliminary
• Trigger on low multiplicity events• veto on cosmic rays
• 2 track vertex w/ charge 0– reject (coplanar) cosmic rays
• peak for pt < 150 MeV/c
• and give background shape– scaled up by 2.1
-)
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
20
Minimum Bias Data
• 800,000 triggers neutron signals in ZDCs
• Nuclear excitation ‘tag’s small b interactions– excitation and 0 are independent
• Analysis same as in peripheral Preliminary
200 GeV
Signal region:
pt<0.15 GeV
d/
dM
m
b/G
eV 200 GeV
Preliminary
0 pt
-)
130 GeV STAR Theory0 with XnXn 36.6 2.4 8.9 mb 27 mb0 with 1n1n 2.50.40.6 mb 2.6 mbExclusive 0 410190100 mb 350 mb
• Normalized to 7.2 b hadronic cross section
• Systematic uncertainties: luminosity, overlapping events, vertex & tracking simulations, single neutron selection, etc.
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
21
Summary of Analyses
shown:• Anisotropic Flow
• Jets at RHIC
• Ultra-Peripheral Collisions
not shown:• Particle yields / ratios / spectra• Interferometry (HBT)• Fluctuations• Gluon density saturation
• Spin physics program
Results:• Large anisotropic flow, consistent
with hydrodynamical picture
• Saturation of v2 at high pt
Jet quenching?
• Suppression of back-to-back ‘jets’ Surface emission?
• 0 cross sections measured in ultra-peripheral Au-Au collisions, good agreement to theory
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
22
RHIC Performance Goals for 2003
• 29 weeks of d-Au (including cooldown)
• 8 weeks of pp• (We won’t have Si-Si nor Au-Au next year.)
More interesting physics to come ...
Markus D. Oldenburg
14th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics
23
STAR InstitutionsU.S. Labs:
Argonne, Brookhaven, and Lawrence Berkeley National Labs
U.S. Universities:
UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UCLA, Carnegie Mellon, Creighton, Indiana, Kent State, Michigan State, CCNY, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Rice, UT Austin, Texas A&M, Valparaiso, Washington, Wayne State, Yale
Brazil: Universidade de Sao Paolo
China:IPP - Wuhan, IMP - Lanzhou USTC, SINR, Tsinghua University, IHEP - Beijing
England: University of Birmingham
France: IReS - Strasbourg SUBATECH - Nantes
Germany: Max Planck Institute - Munich University of Frankfurt
India:Institute of Physics - BhubaneswarIIT - Mumbai, VECC - Calcutta Jammu University, Panjab UniversityUniversity of Rajasthan
The Netherlands:NIKHEF
Poland: Warsaw University of TechnologyRussia:
MEPHI - Moscow, IHEP - ProtvinoLPP & LHE JINR - Dubna