5
Name: Gallardo D. Subject: English didactics Teacher: Correa R.

Reaction paper - L1 and L2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Reaction paper - L1 and L2

Name: Gallardo D.

Subject: English didactics

Teacher: Correa R.

Page 2: Reaction paper - L1 and L2

Summary

In this reaction paper will be analised four texts about thf first language acquisition

and the second language learning. The first one is called “Second language acquisition

and second language learning, chapter 5 , from Stephen D Krashen, Freeman´s chapter 1

and 2, and First and second language learning from V. J. Cook.

What Krashen wants to express is that findings on first language influence on second

language performance are quite consistent with findings and hypotheses from other

apparently nonrelated areas, and that they contribute to a clear theoretical picture of

second language acquisition and performance.

Cook´s text presents the factors that are involved in the L1 an L2 learning, stating

that the use of the fisrt language goes hand in hand with the child´s interests, that the

learning of a first language has many sides and is not simply a matter of learning syntax

and vocabulary, for example.

The first Freeman´s text presents the first language acquisition from the very

beginning, when the children starts babbling. Freeman presents how Beahaviourism is

present at the beginning and how the Environment is important because of the

interaction and the social settings that the children is sorrounded by and helps him to

develop his communication.

The second Freeman´s text shows how the second language is acquired, by writting,

reading, etc, and shows the diferents factors involved in the learning process, the

neurological factors, cognitive factors, affective factors and the fossilization. Also it

presents two views of language development. On is the that language is learned and the

second on is that language is acquired.

Page 3: Reaction paper - L1 and L2

Evaluation

In Krashen´s text is presented an idea from Wode (1978, 1979) wich suggest that:

“there is a structural prerequisite for first language influence: the performer´s

interlinguistic structural description, his idea of the target language rule, must be similar

to the structural description of the rule in his first language”. I completely agree with

this idea because during my period of practice at school, I have seen that the students

tend to form the sentences with englsh words but with the order that they use in their

first language wich is spanish, using the structural description of the rule in his first

language.

Cook`s text also present an interesting idea wich says that the child´s use and

learning of language is partly determined by mental capacity. I think this is a correct

idea because as Cook says “mental capacity is used to refer to all internal psychological

process, including those of attention, organisation and memory”. I think this is

important beacause if I´m going to be a teacher I need to know if my hole class is

learning at the time I give the lessons, or if there are students which have a smaller

mental capacity with the ones I have to work harder, finding solutions to help them to

learn.

Freeman´s chapter 1 text presents the idea of behavoiurism. As it says

“Behabiorists held that all learning, including language learning happened as a process

of stimulus and response and the children´s language learning begins when the child

produces a sound and a parent or other caregiver reinforces that action positively”. It

can be seen constantly whit parents wich have little children. Sometimes childrem make

things and the parents congrats them and sometimes the children learn to do things by

answering what their parents do or tell to them.

Page 4: Reaction paper - L1 and L2

Finally,from the second Freeman´s text I would like to highlight is the two views of

language development. The first is that language is learned and it says that: “ teachers

who hold learning view break language into its component parts and teach them

directly”. And the second view is tha language is acquired, and it says that: “ teachers

who hold an acquisition view attempt to make written and oral language

comprehensible”. I strongly think that we pay attention to this two views of language

development we are going to be able to teach to everyone having success.

References

Page 5: Reaction paper - L1 and L2

Second Language Learning and Language Teaching, 3ed ViVian Cook 2011

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/vivian.c/Writings/Papers/L1&L21979.htm

Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning (1981) Stephen D

KrashenUniversity of Southern California