56
Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Quality Management -Standards

Joan Kelley28th Nov 2002

Page 2: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Background

• Employed UK MoD Assessor in QC system

• Transferred to UKAS (then NATLAS) on inception

• Testing lab UKAS (now ISO 17025) Accredited since 1984

Page 3: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Accreditation Bodies

• UKAS-UK Accreditation Service• NAB-National Accreditation

Board,Ireland• BELCERT and BELTEST, Belgium• Comite Francais d’Accreditation• Deutscher Akkreditierungsrat• Raad voor Accreditatie

Page 4: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Cooperative Bodies

• European co-operation for Accreditation (EA)– EA 4/10 Accreditation for

Microbiological Laboratories, July 2002www.european- accreditation.org– International Laboratory Accreditation

Cooperation (ILAC)www.ilac.org

Page 5: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Context

• Regulations = EN45001, European Standard (others GLP, ISO 9000 etc)

• But since early 2000………….• ISO/IEC 17025 came into force• General Requirements for the

Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories

Page 6: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Current Standards

• ISO 17025- Testing and ‘methods’• ISO 9000 series-production and

management systems• National and international GLP

standards-Medical research

Page 7: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Change in Philosophy

• Process driven approach• -does the system work, rather than

-does it contain specific features• More flexibility for the lab.

Page 8: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Format

• Most technical standards have two main sections ……………...

• Management requirements• Technical requirements

Page 9: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Management

• If part of larger company, key personnel for lab must be defined

• Lab must have tech management but can be a team-individual not necessary

Page 10: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Documents

• Quality Manual• Methods (Technical Operating

Procedures)• Standard Operating Procedures

Page 11: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Quality System

• Management review• Audit programme• Document control• Control of complaints and anomolies• Clear job descriptions• Training records• etc etc etc

Page 12: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Contract Review

• Lab must have procedures which ensure that……

• methods to be used are defined,documented and understood

• lab assured it has capability and resources to carry out work

• appropriate methods are used to meet clients needs

Page 13: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Preventive Actions

• Pro-active look for opportunities to improve not just corrective actions

• Can come from……..• Internal audits,review of AQC

data,staff suggestions,management review

Page 14: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Technical requirements ISO 17025

• Increased emphasis on uncertainty of measurement, always a minefield for microbiol.

• In house calibrations given emphasis

• Future training to be addressed• Opinions and interpretations can be

accredited

Page 15: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Application of Standards to Microbiology labs

Some Guidelines

Page 16: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Quality Control

• Internal AQC to monitor individual performances,cross checks between microbiologists,duplicate preps. of single samples by different people.

• QC of batches of media and diluents ( more later)

Page 17: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Inter-laboratory comparisons

• Lab should participate in external AQC schemes when available and appropriate-Collections to establish system??

• eg PHLS Water and Food QC, FAPAS,NEQAS, SMART etc etc

• Must be seen to act on results-don’t just file and forget

Page 18: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Staff

• Senior member of staff must have appropriate qualifications

• Alternatives may be acceptable with extensive experience

Page 19: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Equipment

• Records for all essential equipment• Cleaning programmes for

appropriate equipment together with documented records

• eg water baths, incubators, fridges, freezers

Page 20: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Reagents

• Generally ANALAR• Water -deionised or distilled• Regents labelled, identity, opening

and expiry dates,conc, storage requirements

• Includes all media and diluents

Page 21: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Calibration

• Must have a co-ordinated, recorded programme encompassing all lab activities

• Measurements of significance to methods must be traceable to national/international standards

Page 22: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Temperature Measuring Devices

• Fridges, incubators,water baths,drying ovens, autoclaves

• Where temp needs to be better than +/- 1C calibrated thermometer in appropriate range essential

• Otherwise BS 593 may be adequate or calibrated ref used to check working thermometers

Page 23: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Cont…….

• Ref thermometers, calibrated every 5 years

• Annual ice point check• Thermocouples-traceable to

national standards • Working thermocouples can be

calibrated in house against ref standards

Page 24: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Weights and Balances

• Must be calibrated at least annually depending on use and environment

• In house or by Accredited service• Daily drift checks

Page 25: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Volume

• Pipettes etc must be calibrated and traceable to national standards

• Variable volume automatic pipettes discouraged

• Disposable pipettes should be batch checked even if supplied from ISO manufacturer

Page 26: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

pH

• Checked daily or before use• Buffers from quality supplier• Buffers prepared to standard and

stored appropriately with an expiry date

Page 27: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Humidity

• Must be calibrated and traceable• Easiest to send to experts!

Page 28: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Autoclaves

• On purchase-multi point validation for all typical loads and put results to use!

• Traceable to national standards• Thereafter calibration of timer and

temperature measuring equipment annually

• Again act on the results

Page 29: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Cont

• Records of all loads and runs must be taken and kept

• In addition load monitors must be used with each load

Page 30: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Air velocity

• If used in eg safety cabinets (ie not done under contract) must be checked for accuracy at regular intervals.

Page 31: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Method Validation

• Methods developed in house, modifications and applications of standard methods must be validated

• But also need to prove you can get the correct results even in standard tests

Page 32: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Essential Features

• Limits of detection• Selectivity• Precision• Reproducibility• Procedures depend on

requirements/qualitative or quantitative/new or existing method?

• Reference materials

Page 33: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Qualitative Results (Presence or Absence)

• Limit of detection• Selectivity determined to ensure

interference not occurring-use a range of micro-organisms

Page 34: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Quantitative methods

• Sensitivity• Selectivity• Precision• Expression of uncertainty

Page 35: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Environment

• Restricted access• Lab coats• ‘Potential for contamination

minimised’ ie non-absorbent surfaces,easy clean, blinds,no plants,no personal possessions,minimal paperwork

• Documented cleaning programme

Page 36: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Cont

• Microbiological monitoring• Records kept• Action and alert limits• Documented procedures

Page 37: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Sample/Deposit Handling and Identification

• System can be simple as notebook or complex LIMS system

• Adequate facilities for storage and segregation essential (fridges,freezers)

• Samples must be stored and examined under conditions which minimise changes in the numbers or viability of micro-organisms

Page 38: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Disposal of Contaminated Waste

• All waste should be autoclaved before leaving the laboratory

• If disposal of waste is subcontracted control measures must be in place

• However if pathogens involved also follow ACDP guidelines and WHO Manuals

Page 39: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Organisms in Quality Systems

Use, preservation and traceability

Page 40: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Organisms in Quality Systems

• Challenge testing• Method validation• Media QC• Analytical Quality Control (AQC)• Proficiency Testing

Page 41: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Guidance for ISO 17025

• States two fundamental requirements:-‘…shall maintain records of checks

on batch to batch variation of media and other reagents by using working standards of known micro-organisms’

‘...shall hold reference cultures obtained from a recognised national collection in order to demonstrate traceability’

Page 42: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Common Confusions

• Definitions of reference/stock/working cultures

• Can you subculture and if so how many times

• Are the newer delivery systems acceptable

Page 43: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Reference Organisms-1

• Reference cultures (i.e. from a collection) may be subcultured once to provide reference stocks

• Reference stocks shall be maintained ‘...by techniques which maintain the desired characteristics of the strains’

• Examples-freeze drying, LN,deep freeze methods

Page 44: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Reference Organisms-2

• Reference stocks are used to prepare working stocks for routine use

• Working stocks can be subcultured if:-– required by a standard method– documentary evidence exists to show

changes do not occur over a defined number of subcultures, and this has been validated

Page 45: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Reference Organisms-3

• Once thawed or otherwise reconstituted reference stocks must not be refrozen or re-used

• Working stocks must not be sub-cultured to replace reference stocks

Page 46: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Things often forgotten

• Document traceability of strains including date purchased,dates sub-cultured dates beads removed etc..

• Continuous monitoring of freezer temp. or at least max/min.

• Place shelf life on all stocks, reference and working

Page 47: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

‘New’ Delivery Systems

• E.g Culti loops, Quanticult etc• All previous requirements still apply• Proof of quality, traceability etc falls

to the laboratory• Treat like any other goods and

service supply but with extra ‘calibration’ requirements

Page 48: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Questions to Ask

• ISO 9000.. Company?• But what for -manufacture,supply?

Who actually makes the products?• Traceability to national collection?• How many passages?• What preservation techniques are

used?

Page 49: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Documents Required

• Validated methods and QC data• Certificate of traceability to

National Collection number• Statement of uncertainty i.e. if

quantitative, number of cfu +/- but also details of how this is calculated, cumulative errors etc.

Page 50: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Finally

• Whatever route chosen, the onus falls on the laboratory to demonstrate quality is being maintained.

Page 51: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Media Quality Control

Why and How

Page 52: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Media QC

• Checked to ensure support growth of appropriate organisms (this includes negative control)

• Must be quantitative if counts involved• Sterility must be confirmed• pH,and other parameters set by

manufacturer must be checked post sterilisation

Page 53: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Diluent QC

• As media where appropriate• Volume of batches dispensed prior

to autoclave must be established post sterilisation and monitored at intervals if stored

• Select percentage, assess gravimetrically

Page 54: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

Media QC Records-

• Type• Batch number• Container• pH• Date (of set up

and read)• Sterility• Volume

• Test strains (+ve,-ve)

• Test conditions (temp,atmosphere)

• Results (expected and actual)

• Signature of staff• Cross ref to

autoclave batch and strain records

Page 55: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

QC Methods

• Simple streak/assess growth and morphology

• Quantitative/known count• Spiked simulated samples-

available for purchase or prepare in-house

Page 56: Quality Management - Standards Joan Kelley 28th Nov 2002

References

• Brown,MRW;Gilbert P. Microbiological Quality Assurance: a guide towards relevance and reproducibility. Boca Raton,FL:CRC Press, 1994

• National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard M22-A2. Quality Assurance for Commercially prepared microbiological culture media. Wayne PA NCCLS, 1996