6
7/23/2019 Q3 Eval Natt http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/q3-eval-natt 1/6 What have you learned from your audience feedback? Nathaniel J ohnson

Q3 Eval Natt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Q3 Eval Natt

7/23/2019 Q3 Eval Natt

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/q3-eval-natt 1/6

What have you learnedfrom your audience

feedback?Nathaniel J

ohnson

Page 2: Q3 Eval Natt

7/23/2019 Q3 Eval Natt

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/q3-eval-natt 2/6

What the audience said

The audience said that theythought it tted in with thethriller genre well.

The ashback scene worked wellat carrying the narrative.

They thought the cli-hanger wasa good ending.

Created good elements of tension.

Page 3: Q3 Eval Natt

7/23/2019 Q3 Eval Natt

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/q3-eval-natt 3/6

trengths

!it the genre of thriller. Created elements ofe"citement and tension.

#udience were ke$t hooked and engaged.

%uild u$ of tension was well done. ongcoming baby monitor brought the thrilleras$ect.

Cinematogra$hy was very good and workedwell.

&usic choice was good and sus$enseful.

Camera angles and shots worked well in thehouse.

Page 4: Q3 Eval Natt

7/23/2019 Q3 Eval Natt

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/q3-eval-natt 4/6

Weaknesses

• 'arrative was sim$le and audience got lost. torywas sometimes hard to follow and should besim$lied.

• ound editing could have been smoother.

• (ighting )um$ed from dark to light shots suddenly.• *diting wasn+t as smooth as could have been.

#s$ect ration changed form ," to /"0 randomly.• !lash back se1uence caused some confusion.

ound of baby monitor sometimes too distorted.• (ighting at beginning was too daark and camera

image was grainy.

Page 5: Q3 Eval Natt

7/23/2019 Q3 Eval Natt

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/q3-eval-natt 5/6

What do 2 think of thefeedback?

• 2 agree with the feedbackgoiven3 there were some verygood and well-done as$ects of

the lm which brought abouttension3 sus$ense3 and allhel$ed with the thriller theme.

• 2 also agree with the negativefeedback3 there were some clearas$ects of our lm that could

have been done better3 and were

Page 6: Q3 Eval Natt

7/23/2019 Q3 Eval Natt

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/q3-eval-natt 6/6

What would 2 dodierently?

• 2f 2 redid the movie again3 2 would obviously usea real baby 4 allowing us to get more shots ofthe baby. Thisd would hel$ with the narrative3as the audience never really saw the baby and

that could be a $roblem. 2t would also allow forbetter chemistry in the activing between thefather and the son.

• 2 would like to make the movie longer than 5minutes. This would hel$ us t in more of the

narrative and story. 2f more narrative were herethe audience could connect more with thecharacters and we could have created morede$th within the characters3 too.