Pushkal Pandey Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    1/9

    Financial crisis

    The term financial crisis is applied broadly to a variety of situations in which some financial

    institutions or assets suddenly lose a large part of their value. In the 19th and early 20th

    centuries, many financial crises were associated with banking panics, and many recessions

    coincided with these panics. Other situations that are often called financial crises include stock

    market crashes and the bursting of other financial bubbles, currency crises, and sovereign

    defaults.Financial crises directly result in a loss ofpaper wealth; they do not directly result in

    changes in the real economy unless a recession or depression follows.

    Many economists have offered theories about how financial crises develop and how they could

    be prevented. There is little consensus, however, and financial crises are still a regular

    occurrence around the world.

    European sovereign debt crisis

    The European sovereign debt crisis is an ongoing financial crisis that has made it difficult or

    impossible for some countries in the euro area to re-finance their government debt without the

    assistance of third parties.

    From late 2009, fears of a sovereign debt crisis developed among investors as a result of the

    rising government debt levels around the world together with a wave of downgrading of

    government debt in some European states. Concerns intensified in early 2010 and

    thereafter,leading Europe's finance ministers on 9 May 2010 to approve a rescue package worth

    750 billion aimed at ensuring financial stability across Europe by creating the European

    Financial Stability Facility (EFSF). In October 2011, the eurozone leaders agreed on another

    package of measures designed to prevent the collapse of member economies. This included an

    agreement whereby banks would accept a 50% write-off ofGreek debt owed to private creditors,

    increasing the EFSF to about 1 trillion, and requiring European banks to achieve 9%

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_run#Systemic_banking_criseshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recessionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_market_crashhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_market_crashhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_bubblehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_defaulthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_defaulthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_wealthhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_areahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refinancehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_debthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_debt_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe#Political_geographyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s_European_sovereign_debt_crisis_timelinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s_European_sovereign_debt_crisis_timelinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Financial_Stability_Facilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Financial_Stability_Facilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government_debt_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creditorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creditorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government_debt_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Financial_Stability_Facilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Financial_Stability_Facilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s_European_sovereign_debt_crisis_timelinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000s_European_sovereign_debt_crisis_timelinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe#Political_geographyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_debt_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_debthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refinancehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_areahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_wealthhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_defaulthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_defaulthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_bubblehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_market_crashhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_market_crashhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recessionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_run#Systemic_banking_crises
  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    2/9

    capitalisation. To restore confidence in Europe, EU leaders also agreed to create a common fiscal

    union including the commitment of each participating country to introduce a balanced budget

    amendment.

    While sovereign debt has risen substantially in only a few eurozone countries, it has become a

    perceived problem for the area as a whole. Nevertheless, the European currency has remained

    stable. As of mid-November 2011, the euro was even trading slightly higher against the bloc's

    major trading partners than at the beginning of the crisis. The three countries most affected,

    Greece, Ireland and Portugal, collectively account for six percent of the eurozone's gross

    domestic product (GDP).

    Overview

    Since the fall of 2009, the European Union has been struggling with a slow-moving but

    unshakable crisis over the enormous debts faced by its weakest economies, such as Greece and

    Portugal, or those most battered by the global recession, like Ireland.

    A series of negotiations, bailouts and austerity packages have failed to stop the slide of investor

    confidence or to restore the growth needed to give struggling countries a way out of their debt

    traps. By August 2011 European leaders found themselves scrambling once again to intervene in

    the markets, this time to protect Italy and Spain, two countries seen as too big to bail out.

    The crisis has produced the deepest tensions within the union in memory, as Germany in

    particular has resisted aid to countries it sees as profligate, and has raised questions about

    whether the euro can survive as a multinational currency, since countries like Greece have been

    unable to boost their exports by devaluing their own currency.

    It has posed great risks to many of the continents banks, which invested heavily in government

    bonds, and forced deep and painful cuts in government spending that drove up unemployment

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_requirementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Fiscal_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Fiscal_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_budget_amendmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_budget_amendmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government_debt_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932012_Irish_financial_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_Portugal#Economic_crisis:_the_2010shttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_producthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_producthttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/greece/index.htmlhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/portugal/index.htmlhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/portugal/index.htmlhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/ireland/index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=ireland%20&st=csehttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/business/global/as-market-tension-builds-world-leaders-ponder-response.html?_r=1http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/business/global/as-market-tension-builds-world-leaders-ponder-response.html?_r=1http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/business/global/as-market-tension-builds-world-leaders-ponder-response.html?_r=1http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/business/global/as-market-tension-builds-world-leaders-ponder-response.html?_r=1http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/ireland/index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=ireland%20&st=csehttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/portugal/index.htmlhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/portugal/index.htmlhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/greece/index.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_producthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_producthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_Portugal#Economic_crisis:_the_2010shttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008%E2%80%932012_Irish_financial_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_government_debt_crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_budget_amendmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_budget_amendmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Fiscal_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Fiscal_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_requirement
  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    3/9

    and put several countries back into deep recessions, leading a growing number of economists to

    call the austerity policies self-defeating.

    The economic crisis gradually became a political one as well, leading to the ouster of

    governments in Ireland, Portugal, Greece and Italy. Protests by traditional interest groups like

    public sector unions were joined by crowds of young people who camped out in Madrid and

    Athens in imitation of the Arab Spring demonstrations.

    In the fall of 2011, even as European leaders struggled to come up with a new bailout plan for

    Greece, much larger fears loomed. Interest rates soared for Italy, the continents third largest

    economy, and rose for France, whose banks hold large amounts of Italian government bonds, and

    where government finances are strained. The continents economy was teetering on the brink of

    a second recession.

    A growing number of economists called for the European Central Bank to step forward as a

    lender of last resort, as the Federal Reserve has done, to stop the contagion. But the bank, whose

    mandate is focused solely on preventing inflation, has resisted, saying a political solution is

    required.

    As the crisis deepened, banks in Europe began to hoard capital, straining the finances of their

    counterparts and hurting companies across the globe that depend on them for loans.

    In December, leaders of the countries that use the euro agreed to an intergovernmental pact

    adopting tighter fiscal controls. All 17 of the countries that use the euro agreed to join, as did six

    others. But Britain refused, raising questions about its future in which it has become increasingly

    isolated.

    The agreement, which can be adopted more quickly than a change to the European Union treaty

    and without Britains consent would reassert rules limiting deficits to 3 percent of gross

    domestic product and total debt to 60 percent. Violators would be hit with sanctions unless a

    majority of other countries agreed.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/world/europe/17greece.html?hp=&pagewanted=printhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/european_central_bank/index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=european%20central%20bank&st=csehttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/business/businesses-scramble-as-credit-tightens-in-europe.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=printhttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/10/business/global/european-leaders-agree-on-fiscal-treaty.html?_r=1&hphttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/10/business/global/european-leaders-agree-on-fiscal-treaty.html?_r=1&hphttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/10/business/global/european-leaders-agree-on-fiscal-treaty.html?_r=1&hphttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/10/business/global/european-leaders-agree-on-fiscal-treaty.html?_r=1&hphttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/business/businesses-scramble-as-credit-tightens-in-europe.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=printhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/european_central_bank/index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=european%20central%20bank&st=csehttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/world/europe/17greece.html?hp=&pagewanted=print
  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    4/9

    After the summit, the familiar pattern of market relief followed by new market worries was

    repeated. But on Dec. 21, banks borrowed more than $600 billion from the European Central

    Bank at the extraordinarily easy terms of 1 percent interest for a three-year loan. Analysts

    suggested that the Bank had hit upon an indirect method of stopping the market spiral

    threatening Italy, Spain and other governments, by flooding banks with money they could use to

    lock in guaranteed profits by buying sovereign debt.

    The next week, Italys short-term borrowing costs fell by half, in the most concrete indication of

    market confidence yet.

    Background

    The debt crisis first surfaced in Greece in October 2009, when the newly elected Socialist

    government of Prime Minister George A. Papandreou announced that his predecessor had

    disguised the size of the countrys ballooning deficit.

    But its roots of the crisis go back further, beginning with a strong euro and the rock-bottom

    interest rates that prevailed for much of the previous decade. Greece took advantage of this easy

    money to drive up borrowing by the countrys consumers and its government, which built up

    $400 billion in debt.

    In Spain and Ireland, government spending was kept under control, but easy money helped turn

    real-estate booms there into bubblesa process helped in Irelands case by the aggressive

    deregulation of its banks that helped draw investment from around the world. After the bubble

    burst, the Irish government made the banks problems its own by guaranteeing all theirliabilities.

    After the extent of Greek debt was revealed, markets reacted by sending interest rates up not

    only for its debt, but also for borrowing by Spain, Portugal and Ireland.

    In early 2010, the European Union and the International Monetary Fund put together a series of

    bailout packages for Greece that totalled 110 billion euros ($163 billion) in a process that critics

    http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/george_a_papandreou/index.html?inline=nyt-perhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/world/europe/30greece.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/world/europe/30greece.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/world/europe/30greece.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/world/europe/30greece.htmlhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/george_a_papandreou/index.html?inline=nyt-per
  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    5/9

    said ended up costing more because European leaders failed to get ahead of the curve. In May,

    leaders approved a contingency fund of 500 billions euro (about $680 billion) for the union at

    large.

    The hope was that the fund would never have to be tapped, as its existence would calm investors.

    But in the fall of 2010 interest rates began creeping up again, as countries that reduced spending

    to meet tough deficit targets found themselves falling farther behind, as their economies slowed

    and revenues declined. In November, European officials arranged a bailout of 85 billion euros

    (roughly $112 billion) for Ireland, after overcoming the resistance of Irish officials to the move,

    which they saw an attack on sovereignty. (In fact, news of the deal led Prime Minister Brian

    Cowen to announce that he would step down after passing a new round of budget cuts, and his

    party was ousted at the next election).

    In the spring of 2010, after much hesitation, the European Union and the International Monetary

    Fund combined first to offer Greece a bailout package of 110 billion euros ($163 billion),

    followed by a broader contingency fund of 500 billions euro (about $680 billion). The hope was

    that this show of financial force would reassure markets about the solvency of euro countries.

    But the new loans, combined with the effect of the austerity measures demanded of Greece,

    Ireland and Portugal, drove them into recession and did little to ease their debt burdenGreeces debt load even increased. As the debt crisis renewed over the winter of 2010 and spring

    of 2011 it led to the fall of governments in Ireland and Portugal, and saw unrest rise in Spain,

    where unemployment remained close to 20 percent.

    Contagion Fears Return

    By the summer of 2011, it was clear that Greece would need a second big bailout package, and

    worries rose again about contagion, as Italy and Spain saw the interest rates charged on its

    borrowing rise steeply. The European Central Bank responded by buying large amounts of

    Italian and Spanish bonds, as leaders put together a plan that would increase the powers of the

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/11/business/global/11euro.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/11/business/global/11euro.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/11/business/global/11euro.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/11/business/global/11euro.html
  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    6/9

    European Financial Stability Facility to head off a run' on governments seen as in danger of

    default.

    By September, with growth slowing, stalled or in reverse across the continent, European leaders

    were increasingly discussing the creation of a central financial authoritywith powers in areas

    like taxation, bond issuance and budget approvalthat could eventually turn the euro zone into

    something resembling a United States of Europe.

    But talk of long-term solutions did little to calm markets worried about the weakness of banks in

    France and elsewhere that held large amounts of debt from Greece and other shaky governments.

    And the resignation of Jrgen Stark, a top German official at the European Central Bank,

    highlighted the depth of policy discord among senior policymakers. Mr. Stark, like many

    German officials, had opposed the banks large-scale purchases of government debt.

    Another potential crisis bubbled up in September, as European officials angrily warned Greece

    that the next installment of its bailout funding would be withheld in Octobera step that would

    lead to certain bankruptcyunless further radical cuts in government spending were pushed

    through.

    Earlier that summer, Greece, which had started the crisis, faced its more dire fiscal emergency,

    as it stood to run out of cash in August without a new installment of money from the first bailout.

    European leaders refused to release the funds until a second, more drastic round of austerity

    measures were adopted, including the sale of $72 billion in state assets. The government of

    Prime Minister George Papandreou teetered, but the measure was pushed through after days of

    giant street protests.

    The basic conflict over the shape of a new bailout plan was between Germanys chancellor,

    Angela Merkel, who insisted that private banks pay part of the cost by taking losses on Greek

    bonds, and the European Central Bank, who opposed even a voluntary haircut' for banks,

    saying it would be seen as a default.

    http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/european_financial_stability_facility/index.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/business/global/reluctantly-europe-inches-closer-to-a-fiscal-union.html?src=un&feedurl=http://json8.nytimes.com/pages/business/global/index.jsonp&pagewanted=printhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/currency/euro/index.html?inline=nyt-classifierhttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/10/business/global/a-top-ecb-official-to-resign.html?scp=1&sq=jurgen%20stark&st=csehttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/george_a_papandreou/index.html?inline=nyt-perhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/george_a_papandreou/index.html?inline=nyt-perhttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/10/business/global/a-top-ecb-official-to-resign.html?scp=1&sq=jurgen%20stark&st=csehttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/currency/euro/index.html?inline=nyt-classifierhttp://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/business/global/reluctantly-europe-inches-closer-to-a-fiscal-union.html?src=un&feedurl=http://json8.nytimes.com/pages/business/global/index.jsonp&pagewanted=printhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/european_financial_stability_facility/index.html
  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    7/9

    European Debt Crisis: Implications and Lessons

    for ASEAN

    With the global economy still coming out of its misery in 2008-2009, Greece got badly exposed

    for its years of unrestrained spending and failure to implement financial reforms. The countrys

    statistics revealed a national debt of US$414 billion, bigger than the countrys economy, and a

    fiscal deficit of 12.7 percent of the GDP. Greece' credit rating has been downgraded, implying s

    worsening investors confidence for the economy. This has raised fears that Greeces problem

    will infect other eurozone economies, especially the weaker members like Portugal, Ireland, Italy

    and Spain (or the PIIGS). The 16 nations sharing the euro currency came up with an emergencyrescue plan of US$1 trillion on 9th of May to prevent the crisis from spreading through the

    region and to keep the euro currency from imploding. The package included loans, guarantees,

    bond purchases and US$318 billion of assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

    What does this mean for ASEAN economies? ASEAN exports in the short term could face some

    problems from the Greek debt contagion. As the Eurozone governments try to get their budget

    deficits back to the blocs 3 percent limit, Europes export demand could take a hit if fiscal

    spending has to be cut significantly. The ASEAN region would also be affected as the banks may

    get guarded on its lending activities and businesses may find it difficult to raise capital through

    unpredictable stock markets in next couple of months. All this would lead to higher borrowing

    costs in the region. However, the impact is likely to be minimal in the long run. The EU bailout

    plan is expected to contain the spread of the debt crisis. In the case of ASEAN, its Asian

    neighbors play a more significant role, accounting for 33 percent of the total Groupings export.

    This is against EUs share of only 13 percent. Moreover, most ASEAN exports go to larger

    European economies like Germany and France and thus the crisis in the smaller economies of

    PIIGS would not be felt much by the exporters in the region.

  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    8/9

    The ASEAN financial markets may witness higher volatility as uncertainty remains about the

    sovereign debt crisis engulfing the eurozone. There are also several concerns about the financing

    package. Firstly, the richer European members have to convince their taxpayers to help the

    troubled economies, which is difficult to carry on in practice. Secondly, the bailout package

    includes conditionality that the PIIGS would implement austerity measures related to reining

    in fiscal excesses. This is not easy to implement as it may generate social unrest in the domestic

    economy. Most of the stock indices of ASEAN (Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia)

    plunged 1-5 percent since April 2010, but bounced back briefly after the announcement of the

    EU package. The fall in equity markets was primarily due to capital flight out of the country into

    safe havens like US Treasuries, and mirrored the sell-off on Wall Street. Officials in Indonesia

    and the Philippines have however ruled out imposing capital controls immediately. Singapores

    central bank said that it will continue to monitor international developments and will respond to

    the market turmoil if there is a need. The ASEAN policy makers believe that the economies are

    strong fundamentally. It has ample foreign reserves and fiscal affairs are relatively stable. Hence,

    fast remedies due to problems elsewhere could affect investor confidence and encourage selling

    in many countries. The ASEAN economic recovery from the 2008 financial crisis is unlikely to

    be derailed by the European debt crisis, albeit it may slow it temporarily. The rebound in global

    economic activity in the last twelve months was mainly led by the resurgence of Asia. According

    to the IMF, the growth rates in the emerging and developing economies are expected to reach

    around 6.3 percent in 2010-2011, as against 2.2 percent growth in the advanced world. A

    stronger economic framework and appropriate policy response are helping most of the Asian

    economies to cushion imported shocks and re-attract capital flows quickly. On the other hand,

    the economic growth rates in European economies are still not on a firm footing as they continue

    to suffer from balance sheet problems of households, banks, and the government. What is likely

    to happen is that the ASEAN Central Banks that started raising the policy rates or have not

    started their tightening cycle as yet are likely to maintain a looser stance, at least until

  • 8/2/2019 Pushkal Pandey Report

    9/9

    the policy makers see clear signs of stability in the euro economies. For example, Bank Negara

    Malaysia, who had raised the Overnight Policy Rate to 2.5 percent recently, is likely to wait for

    the next few months. Bank Indonesia and the Bank of Thailand, who were maintaining low

    interest rate policies till recently, will display extreme caution in raising policy rates anytime

    soon. The US$1 trillion emergency package is expected to bring back some stability to the Euro

    and is expected to calm the financial markets, preventing a repeat of 2008s disaster. But what

    ASEAN must learn from the Greek crisis? Excessive debt build-up without a solution to

    minimize it will extract a high price in the future. Among the ASEAN members, Malaysia has a

    public debt of 54 percent of GDP and the Philippines, 62 percent of GDP. While their economic

    condition is nowhere near that of the troubled European economies, they should still head the

    lesson from the current crisis before things run out of hand. At the current juncture, when the

    ASEAN member countries are comfortably coming out of the last years recession, slashing

    budget deficits is not an easy task to accomplish. Cutting public expenditure too soon is likely to

    reduce consumption and may hamper economic growth. It is therefore important to introduce

    measures to increase the efficiency in tax collection and find ways to minimize the big subsidy

    bill that is incurred by most of the ASEAN governments on an annual basis. ASEAN is

    undergoing its own regional economic integration process. ASEAN leaders are aiming to

    establish an ASEAN Economic Community by 2015. However, it has its own challenges and one

    of them is the issue of the development divide, especially since the admission of Cambodia,

    Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam. ASEAN must be able to narrow the divide at least partially by

    2015 because with economic integration the member countries would be more dependent on

    each other in terms of export and investment, securities and property markets, and even

    consumer and investor confidence. This implies that any disturbance or problem of one country

    can eventually lead to disruption in another. Thus, in an increasingly integrated region the policy

    planning must take into account the issues of the weaker members so that a situation similar to

    EU does not occur in ASEAN. The writer is Lead Researcher for Economic Affairs at the Asean

    Studies Centre, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.