Upload
kenokuniya
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
1/48
Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
CHAPTER 14
GENE REGULATION IN BACTERIAAND BACTERIOPHAGES
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
2/48
Introduction
The term gene regulation means that the level of
gene expression can vary under different conditions
Genes that have constant levels of expression aretermed constitutive sometimes called housekeeping genes
The benefit of regulating genes is that encoded
proteins will be produced only when required
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
3/48
Most regulation of gene expression is attranscriptional level rate of RNA synthesis increased or decreased
Transcriptional regulation involves actions of twotypes of regulatory proteins Repressors Bind to DNA & inhibit transcription Activators Bind to DNA & increase transcription
Negative control refers to transcriptional regulationby repressor proteins
Positive control to regulation by activator proteins
Transcriptional Regulation
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
4/48
Small effector molecules affect transcription regulation bind to regulatory proteins not to DNA directly
effector molecule may increase transcription inducers
Bind activators & cause activator to bind DNA
Bind repressors & prevent repressor from binding DNA Genes regulated this way are inducible
effector molecule may inhibit transcription Corepressors
bind repressors & cause repressor to bind DNA
Inhibitors bind activators & prevent activator from binding DNA
Genes regulated this way are repressible
Transcriptional Regulation
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
5/48
Regulatory proteins havetwo binding sites One for a small effector
molecule The other for DNA
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
6/48
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
7/48
gene regulation gods
Franois Jacob & Andr Lwoff 1953 CSH SymposiumJacques Monod Paris 1961
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
8/48
Diauxic Growth Curve DemonstratedAdaptation to Lac Metabolism
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
9/4814-13Figure 14.3 Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
The lacOperon
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
10/48
Regulatory Sequences of the Lac Operon
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
11/48
Negative - repressor protein - LacI
Positive - activator protein CAP or CRP
Induction of Lac operon requires 2 events
Release of repression lactose binds to the lac repressor causing the repressor to release
operator site in DNA
Activation
cAMP binds CAP protein, cAMP-CAP dimerizes & binds CAP sitein DNA
Insures that operon is on only if lactose is present
glucose is low
The LacOperon Is Regulated both
Positively & Negatively
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
12/4814-15Figure 14.4
Constitutive
expression
RNA pol
cannot initiate
transcription
The lacoperon is now
repressed
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
13/48
Lac repressor protein (violet)forms a tetramer which binds to
two operator sites (red) located
93 bp apart in the DNA causing
a loop to form in the DNA. As a
result expression of the lacoperon is turned off. This model
also shows the CAP protein
(dark blue) binding to the CAP
site in the promoter (dark blue
DNA). The -10 & -35 sequences
of the promoter are indicated in
green.
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
14/4814-16Figure 14.4 Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
The conformation of the
repressor is now altered
Repressor can no longer
bind to operator
TranslationThe lacoperon is now
induced
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
15/48
The cycle oflacoperon induction & repressionFigure 14.5
Repressor does not completely
inhibit transcription
small amounts of the enzymes
are made
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
16/48
1950s, Jacob & Monod, & Arthur Pardee, identified
mutant bacteria with abnormal lactose adaptation
defect in lacIgene designated lacII = induction mutant
caused constitutive expression oflacoperon
(ie in absence of lactose)
The lacI mutations mapped very close to the lacoperon
The lacIGene Encodes a Repressor
Protein
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
17/48
Jacob, Monod & Pardee hypothesized 2 ways forlacI
to function
Used genetic approach to test hypotheses
This hypothesis predicts that
lacI works in trans manner This hypothesis predicts thatlacI works in a cis manner
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
18/48
Used F plasmids carrying part oflacoperon Put into mutant bacteria by conjugation
Bacteria that get F have 2 copies oflacI
gene merodipoloids
PaJaMo Experiment
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
19/48
2 lacIgenes in a merodiploid are alleles lacI on the chromosome lacI+ on the F factor
Genes on F plasmid are trans to bacterialchromosome If hypothesis 1 is correct
repressor produced from F plasmid can regulate the lac
operon on the bacterial chromosome If hypothesis 2 is correct
binding site on F plasmid cannot affect lacoperon on thebacterial chromosome, because they are not physically
adjacent
PaJaMo Experiment
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
20/48
14-23Figure 14.7
PaJoMo Experiment
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
21/48
Figure 14.7 14-24
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
22/48
Figure 14.7 14-25
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
23/48
Results
Lactose addition has no effect
because operon is already onInduction is restored in merodiploid.
Now lactose addition is required to
turn operon on
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
24/48
From Jacob & Monod, 1961,J Mol Biol3:318
Wildtype
Induction
mutants
Analysis of Lac Operon Mutants
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
25/48
Analysis of Lac Operon Mutants
-
FI-O+Z+Y+
I+O+Z-Y+
lacI
From Jacob & Monod, 1961, J Mol Biol 3:318
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
26/48
From Jacob & Monod, 1961,J Mol Biol3:318
l f O
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
27/48
Analysis of Lac Operon Mutants
-
-
Mutation is
cis
In merodiploid, LacZ constitutive, but LacY inducible
OC
controls transcription of DNA on which OC
islocated
O (operator) is cis-regulatory element
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
28/48
Interpreting the Data
The interaction between regulatory proteins & DNAsequences have led to two definitions Trans-effect & trans-actingfactor
Genetic regulation that can occur even though DNA segments are
not physically adjacent Mediated by genes that encode DNA-binding regulatory proteins
Example: The action of the lacrepressor on the lacoperon
Cis-effect & cis-actingelement A DNA sequence adjacent to the gene(s) it regulates
Mediated by sequences that are bound by regulatory proteins
Example: The lacoperator
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
29/48
Genetic Implications ofTrans vs Cis
mutations in trans-acting factors complemented by2nd wt gene
mutations in cis-acting elements ARE NOTcomplemented by 2nd wt element
Trans interactions (complementation) indicate
mutation in structural gene
Cis interactions indicate mutations in regulatory
sequences
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
30/48
From Jacob & Monod, 1961,J Mol Biol3:318
Wildtype
Induction
suppression
mutant
Dominant
Negative
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
31/48
Dominant Inhibitors orDominant Negatives
Proteins with multiple functional domains &form multimeric complexes may be altered
to prevent one function, but allow the other When mutants retain ability to form
multimeric complexes, dominant inhibition
may occur
Analysis of Lac Operon Mutants
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
32/48
Analysis of Lac Operon Mutants
Mutation is
trans
Dominant-negative
Mutation disrupts ligand binding domain of repressor
Analysis of Lac Operon Mutants
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
33/48
Analysis of Lac Operon Mutants
Mutation disrupts DNA binding domain of repressor
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
34/48
catabolite repression
When exposed to both lactose & glucose E. coliuses glucose first, & catabolite repression prevents
the use of lactose
When glucose is depleted, catabolite repression is
alleviated, & the lacoperon is expressed
The sequential use of two sugars by a bacterium is
termed diauxic growth
lacOperon Also Regulated By Activator Protein
The lac Operon Is Also Regulated By an Activator
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
35/48
Effector molecule in catabolite repression cAMP
(cyclic AMP)
cAMP is produced from ATP by adenylyl cyclase
cAMP binds activator protein CAP orCRP(CataboliteActivator Protein) or(cyclic AMP receptor protein)
The lacOperon Is Also Regulated By an Activator
Protein
States of Lac Regulation
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
36/48
Figure 14.8
States of Lac Regulation
(b) Lactose but no cAMP
States
of Lac Regulation
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
37/48
Figure 14.8
States of Lac Regulation
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
38/48
Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
The trp operon (pronounced trip) is involved in the
biosynthesis of the amino acid tryptophan
The genes trpE, trpD,trpC, trpB & trpA encode enzymesinvolved in tryptophan biosynthesis
The genes trpR& trpL are involved in regulation trpREncodes the trp repressor protein
Functions in repression
trpL Encodes a short peptide called the Leader peptide Functions in attenuation
The trp Operon
14-44
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
39/48
Organization of the trp operon & regulation via the trp
repressor protein
Figure 14.13
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
40/48
14-47
Organization of the trp operon & regulation via the trp
repressor protein
Figure 14.13
Another mechanism
of regulation
Med
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
41/48
14-45
Organization of the trp operon & regulation via the trp
repressor protein
Figure 14.13
Cannot bind to
the operator site
RNA pol can bind
to the promoter
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
42/48
Attenuation occurs in bacteria because of the coupling of
transcription & translation
During attenuation, transcription actually begins but it isterminated before the entire mRNA is made A segment of DNA, termed the attenuator, is important in facilitating
this termination
In the case of the trp operon, transcription terminates shortly past
the trpL region (Figure 14.13c) Thus attenuation inhibits the further production of tryptophan
The segment oftrp operon immediately downstream from the
operator site plays a critical role in attenuation The first gene in the trp operon is trpL
It encodes a short peptide termed the Leader peptide
R i 2 i l i 1 & 3
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
43/48
Sequence of the trpL mRNA produced during attenuationFigure 14.14
These two codons provide a wayto sense if there is sufficient
tryptophan for translation
The 3-4 stem loop is
followed by a sequence ofUracils
Region 2 is complementary to regions 1 & 3
Region 3 is complementary to regions 2 & 4
Therefore several stem-loops structures are possible
It acts as an intrinsic
( -independent) terminator
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
44/48
Therefore, the formation of the 3-4 stem-loop
causes RNA pol to terminate transcription at the
end of the trpL gene
Conditions that favor the formation of the 3-4
stem-loop rely on the translation of the trpL mRNA
There are three possible scenarios 1. High levels of tryptophan
2. Medium levels of tryptophan high trp-tRNA
3. Low levels of tryptophan med-low trp-tRNA
Repression occurs
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
45/48
Organization of the trp operon & regulation via the trp
repressor protein
Figure 14.13
Repression occurs
Attenuation occurs
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
46/48
Possible stem-loop structures formed from trpL mRNA under
different conditions of translationFigure 14.15
Sufficient amounts of tRNAtrp
Translation of the trpL mRNA
progresses until stop codon
Region 2 cannot base pair
with any other region
3-4 stem-loop forms
Transcription
terminatesRNA polymerase pauses
Med
Attenuation occurs
ranscr p on occurs
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
47/48
Possible stem-loop structures formed from trpL mRNA under
different conditions of translationFigure 14.15
Insufficient amounts
of tRNAtrp
Region 1 is blocked
3-4 stem-loop
does not form
RNA pol transcribes
rest of operon
ranscr p on occurs
7/31/2019 Prok Gene Reg
48/48
The study of many operons revealed a general trendconcerning inducible versus repressible regulation
Operons involved in catabolism (ie. breakdown of a
substance) are typically inducible The substance to be broken down (or a related compound) acts
as the inducer
Operons involved in anabolism (ie. biosynthesis of asubstance) are typically repressible The inhibitor or corepressor is the small molecule that is the
product of the operon
Inducible vs Repressible Regulation