Upload
thegame1101
View
222
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
1/110
A PROJ ECT REPORT ON
A STUDY ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TOWARDS
ROOM SERVICE AT LE MERIDIEN, BANGALORE.
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements of the Masters Degree in Business
Administration course of Bangalore University
By
SHRUTHI SRINIVAS
04XQCM6089
2004-2006
Under the Guidance ofProf. Ramgopal
M.P. Birla Institute of Management
Associate Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
Bangalore 560001.
1
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
2/110
DECLARATION
I, Shruthi Srinivas, student of MBA 4th Semester MP Birla Institute of
Management hereby declare that this project report titled A Study On
Customer Satisfaction Towards Room Service at Le Meridien, Bangalore
submitted by me under the guidance of Prof. Ramgopal is original and not
copied from earlier reports.
I further declare that this project report has not formed a basis for the award
of any Degree/Diploma of the institution or any other university.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Shruthi Srinivas)
2
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
3/110
GUIDES CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Ms. Shruthi Srinivas has satisfactorily completed the
project report titled A study on customer satisfaction towards room service
at Le Meridien, Bangalore, in the partial fulfillment of the requirement for
the award of Master of Business Administration for the academic year 2004-
2006.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Mr. Ramgopal)
Guide
M.P. Birla Institute of Management
3
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
4/110
PRINICPALS CPERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that this project is an offshoot of the research work
undertaken and completed by Ms. Shruthi Srinivas under the guidance of
Prof. Ramgopal, Faculty, M.P. Birla Institute of Management, Associate
Bharatiya VIdya Bhavan, Bangalore.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Dr.Nagesh.S.Malavalli)
Principal
M.P.Birla Institute of Management
4
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
5/110
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to take this opportunity to express my profound gratitude to all
those who have been instrumental in the preparation.
Acknowledgement of thanks is due to Dr. N.S. Malavalli, Principal, MP
Birla Institute of Management for providing an opportunity to gain practical
experience by working on this project.
I extend my sincere thanks to Mr. Ramgopal for his able guidance and
assistance rendered in the preparation of this report.
At the outset, I would like to sincerely thank Ms. Alia Begum, HR Manager
and Mr. Sarabjeet Singh, Training Manager for their encouragement and
valuable support during my stay with them.
Lastly, I would like to thank my parents and friends for their continuous help
and support.
Place: Bangalore
Date:
(Shruthi Srinivas)
5
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
6/110
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Economic liberalisation has given a new impetus to the hospitality industry.
It costs an average of US$50-80 million to set up five-star hotels with 300
rentable rooms in India. The gestation period is usually between three and
four years. Movements in real estate prices have to be watched, though they
have stabilised in the past three years or so. The Indian hospitality industry
is growing at a rate of 15 percent annually. The current gap between supply(61,000 rooms) and demand (90,000 rooms) is expected to widen further as
the economy opens and grows. The government forecasts an additional
requirement of 200,000 rooms by the turn of the century. A rapidly growing
middle class, the advent of corporate incentive travel and the multinational
companies into India has boosted prospects for tourism. India's easy visa
rules, public freedoms and its many attractions as an ancient civilisation
makes tourism development easier than in many other countries. Several
international chains including Sheraton, Holiday Inn, Intercontinental, Le
Meridien, Hyatt, Radisson, Hilton, Quality Inn, and Marriott International
are entering or expanding their hotel network in India.
The research was conducted to study the consumers satisfaction towards
room service at Le Meridien the city of Bangalore. The methodology
followed is questionnaire method with a total sample size of 1000
respondents. The data is tabulated and graphically represented. Findings and
recommendations are listed at the end of this project.
6
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
7/110
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
7
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
8/110
INTRODUCTION TO HOTEL INDUSTRY
Service has increasingly assumed as an important role in the Indian
economy. The trend was set in the nineties, service had gained dominance.
On the other hand the competition in service organization is becoming
intense and severe. As a result the service organization, have to have a more
professional approach to manage their business organization.
Tourism is Indias largest forex earner, and contributing largely to the influx
of tourists is the large number of hotels, to suit the plethora of needs, whims
and fancies of the tourists. The hospitality industry in India comprises of
properties, which are either privately owned or run by the government.
The industry is very competitive and clearly only the hotels that provide
value added services stand to gain. The breadwinner in most hotels is the
food and beverages department, which cater to the tastes and fancies of
various guests.
The hospitality industry suffers from seasonal fluctuations in demand, which
are reflected in the occupancy percentages, it is therefore of paramount
importance. The hotel constantly innovate and evolve in order to provide the
complete "hospitality experience".
8
Hence, the contribution made by this industry to the country, cannot be
undermined.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
9/110
INTRODUCTION TO CONSUMER
BEHAVIOR
Understanding the buying behavior of the target market is the essential task
of marketing manager under the marketing concept. The consumer market
consists of all the individuals and households that buy goods and services for
personnel consumption. Consumers may vary in age, income, and taste.
Marketers find useful to distinguish different consumers groups or segments
to develop products and services tailored to their needs. Increasingly,
managers have had to turn to consumer research for answers to the most
important questions about any market, called seven O's of the market place.
1. Who constitutes the market? Occupations
2. What does the market buy? Objects
3. Why does the market buy? Objectives
4. Who participates in buying? Organization
5. How does the market buy? Operation
6. When does the market buy? Occasion
7. Where does the market buy? Outlets
Of central interest is the question, how do consumer respond to various
markets controlled stimuli? The company that understands how consumers
will respond to the different product features, prices, advertising appeals,
and so on will have an enormous advantage over its competitors. There is a
9
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
10/110
lot of research done in finding the relationship between marketing stimuli
and consumer's response. The starting point is the stimulus response model,
which shows marketing and other stimuli entering the buyers "black box"and producing the buyer's responses. Marketing stimuli consists of the 4 P's.
Product, Price, Place and Promotion.Environmental stimuli consists of
Major forces and events in the buyer's macro-environmental: Economic,
technological, political and cultural. All these stimuli pass through the
buyer's black box and produce the buyer's purchase decisions shown on the
right product choice, brand choice, dealer choice, purchase timing and
purchase amount.
The marketer's main task is to understand what happens in the buyer's black
box between outside stimuli and the buyer's purchase decision.
Thus, we can ask two questions: -
1. What does a consumer want?
2. How does the consumer respond to various market controlled stimuli?
Let us consider Philip Kotler's "BLACK BOX" which lists factors
influencing consumer behaviour.
10
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
11/110
Buyer Characteristics Buyer Decision Process
Cultural Problem Recognition
Social Information Search
Personal Evaluation
Psychological Post Purchase Behavior
The Black Box restricts itself to the internal factors that influence decision.
However, market must look beyond this, at the buyer-grid network of
purchase.
BUYER-GRID NETWORK
INITIATOR - Person who first suggests the buying
of a product/service.
INFLUENCER - Person who is opinion holds weights
in the purchase.
DECIDER - Person deciding on the components
of a sale like when to buy, how to
much to buy, how to buy etc.
BUYER - Actual purchaser
USER -Final consumer
11
By recognising these roles in the consumer groups, the marketer should
market his offering to the appropriate player. Such care will reduce the
marketing expenses, thus, bringing down the non-respondent rate
considerably.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
12/110
BUYER BEHAVIOR PATTERNS
Consumers exhibit four most important recurring behavior patterns
They are listed below:
1. Complex buying behavior
2. Dissonance reducing behavior
3. Habitual buying behavior
4. Variety seeking buying behavior
A single consumer may exhibit all the above depending on the offering, time
of purchase, value exchanged, and occasion of purchase necessity of
consumer and other related variables.
It is essential for a marketer to pre-empt the behavior pattern of a consumer
to make a successful sale. Considering the first oil crisis of 1973 as
milestone of change, the business environment has moved from a
relatively stable form to one of high uncertainty. Globalization, emergence
of corporate raiders, government deregulation, and privatization has all
forced companies to re-orient and reposition themselves i.e. companies have
had to create a new identity to survive. Corporate identity is formed by in
organizations history its ownership and personality of its leaders.
Nevertheless, identity parse, is not what the consumer recognizes. Its more
internalized to the company alone.
12
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
13/110
'Corporate image' is in the eye of the receiver. A company may transmit any
number of messages to convey a particular self-image, but it is the
'reception' of the message that is important. One advantage of image is that itis transmutable.
Perceptions may be changed with considerable efforts from a corporate
perspective; 'image' assumes importance due to certain reasons:
1. Product/services have rapid flowing lifecycles.
2. A continuous re-orientation is necessary for companies if, they wish to
maintain/remain in business.
3. In the process of reorientation, if a company does not have a stable image,
the uncertainty among distributors and consumers increase.
Needless to say that a corporate image has close links with the consumer,
Virginia Valentine of Semiotic Solutions, a market research firm, explains
the tie like this: '"For the purpose of understanding corporate imagery the
whole focus is on the way in which a consumer forms a symbol. The
mythologies which guide the consumers deepest and most emotional
decisions are of the great importance."
The above note leads to these conclusions:
1. To complete effectively, companies have to match strategy with image.
13
2. Communication of distinctive corporate identity is s major means of
achieving a unique positioning.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
14/110
3. Geographically dispersed operations can be managed with a corporate
identity alone.
4. For a budget hotel, development of identities related to individual states isthe winning trick
5. Most important of all, economics of communication can be achieved by
presenting a well-defined image.
SERVICE SECTOR
Service sector plays an important role in the Indian economy. The trend was
set and in the nineties, service had gained dominance. On the other hand the
competition in service organization is becoming intense and severe. As a
result the service organization, if they have to be successful, has to have amore professional approach to manage their business organization.
Specific demand for service marketing concepts has come from the
deregulated industries and professional services as both of these groups have
gone through rapid changes in the ways they do business. In the past, the
government has deregulated many very large service industries including
airlines, banking telecommunications and trucking. As a result, marketing
decisions that used to be tightly controlled by the government are now
partially, and in some cases totally, within the control of individual firms.
14
Because of the advances in information based technologies a multitude of
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
15/110
new services concepts have exploded in to the market place. Fax machines,
voice mail and cellular phones are examples of technology-based concepts
that have substituted for traditional ways of a delivering similar service.
In most industries, providing quality services is no longer simply an option.
The quick pace of developing technologies and increasing competition make
it difficult to gain strategic competitive advantage through physical products
alone. Plus customers are more demanding. They not only expect excellent,
high quality goods they also expect high levels of service along with them.
Almost all of the absolute growth in number of jobs and the fastest growth
rates in job information are in services industries. There is a growing market
for services and increasing dominance force in countries around the world as
can be seen in global feature. The tremendous growth and economic
contribution of the service sector have drawn increasing attention to the
issues and problems of service sector industries.
Put in most simple terms, services are deeds, processes and performances.
Relying on the simple broad definition of services, it quickly becomes
apparent that services are produced not only by service business such as
those just described but are also integral to the offering of many
manufactured goods producers.
15
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
16/110
Hotel: The concept and Marketing
At the outset it is essential to go through the conceptual aspect of hotel. The
common law says that hotel is a place where all who conduct themselves
properly and who being able and ready to pay for their entertainment,
accommodation and other services including the boarding like a temporary
home. It is home away from home where all amenities and facilities are
available but chargeable.
The aforesaid viewpoints regarding a hotel clarifies that hotel is a public
place where all possible facilities entertainment, meals, accommodation etc,
become essential products of hotel. The American concept regarding the
hotel considers a place for business together. Further it is also supposed to
be a place where tourists stop, cease to be travelers and become guests.
Boarding and lodging thus became primary and fundamental characteristics
of a hotel. Incidental to such a fundamental and principal business, the hotels
may also furnish quarters and facilities for the assembly of people for social,
business or entertainment purposes. Hotels are also furnished with big
conference halls and banquet halls where maximum possible
accommodations can be made.
16
Further the facilities may also get the provision of amusement centers,
shopping complex, swimming pool, garden, car parking, conference hall and
advance communication facilities. In a hotel industry thus, the formulation
of product mix becomes significant as new sophisticated and refine services
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
17/110
bear the efficacy of wooing customers. Besides, sound behavioral
management helps in excelling competition and is found instrumental in
turning the potential customers in to actual customers.
In the yesteryears, we have witnessed large-scale movement of human
resources maximum emphasis on foreign trade, cultural exchange etc. The
emerging positive trends in the world tourism indicate that hotel industry is
like reservoir from where foreign exchange flows. This naturally draws our
attention on hotel management. In addition the domestic tourism also
indicates a positive trend. All these new trends favor scientific management
of hotels, which is possible when management practices general and
marketing practices in particular get an intensive care.
Now the organization engaged in hotel business is required to say good- bye
to the traditional management practices in which the marketing strategies
were also traditional. Of late, it is essential that the hotel organizations
assign over riding priority to modem management in which customers are
always supposed to be right.
17
The concept of hotel marketing confirms the alignment of marketing
principles in the hotel business where customer's satisfaction is an important
dimension. The application of marketing principles in hotel industry is
consider essential with the motto of initiating qualitative improvements in
the service and generating satisfaction so that the guests' expectations are
entertained. The managerial proficiency is found difficult unless marketing
practices become an integral part of hotel management. The customary
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
18/110
marketing concept adopted in other industries is found effective even in the
hotel industry. Marketing is considered to be a customer satisfaction
engineering tool. Hotel management is a managerial approach to satisfyguests and strengthen the promotional measures so that the potential guests
are motivated and thus transformed in to actual guests.
Publicity and promotion are found to be two important components helpful
in making the marketing decisions. Promotional strategies are found
effective in raising magnitude of sensitivity. Here the expectations of
customers are based on intangible qualities like atmosphere and image.
Before buying customers have certain expectations. It is significant that the
potential customers get correct and time-honored information regarding the
product.
In addition to the usual advertising and publicity, the promotional tools
include folders, cards, price list and list of general and special items to be
served. Thus, hotel marketing is a device to promote business, generate
profits and satisfy customers. It is a managerial approach in which the
magnitude of success is influenced by customer's satisfaction image
projection is also an integral past of hotel marketing.
18
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
19/110
Classification of a hotel:
The following are the types of hotels:
1. Residential hotel
2. Commercial hotel
3. Resort hotel
4. International hotel
5. Floating hotel
1. Residential hotels: The residential hotels work as apartment house, often
called as apartment hotels. These charge rent on a monthly, half yearly
or yearly basis. The accommodation may be
Furnished / unfurnished. These hotels are generally found located in big
cities where no meals are served to the guests.
2. Commercial hotels: These are meant for the people who visit a place for
commerce/business purposes and so these hotels are found located at the
commercial or industrial centers. They usually focus their attention on
individual travel and run by owners.
3. Resort hotels: The resort hotels are meant for the holidaymakers, touristsand for those who need a change in atmosphere mainly on health ground.
These are found located near the sea, mountain and other areas having a
natural beauty and healthy atmosphere.
19
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
20/110
4. International hotels: These are the modem luxurious hotels, classified on
the basis of international guidelines. These are placed in various star
categories five star deluxe, five star, three star, two star, and one star.These hotels are mostly owned by public companies where B.O.D is
constituted for its control. These are found suitable for metropolitan cities
where affluent sections of the society and foreign tourists are government
representative stay.
5. Floating hotels: The floating hotels are located on water surface. Places like
sea, river or lake are considered suitable. For floating hotels, these provide
almost facilities a good hotel provides. In developed countries, old luxury
ships have been converted in to floating hotels.
20
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
21/110
Hotel product:
In the hotel marketing, it is pertinent that we have a descriptive idea of the
product/service offered by hotels. Following figures gives an idea of the
products and services offered in a hotel.
Main products in a hotel:
Reception - Welcome
Boarding - Catering, Restaurant, Cafeteria
Lodging - Room, bed, light, air, sanitation etc
Entertainment - TV/ VCR / VCP, Internet, dance, music,
cultural shows, drama. Shopping arcade,
organization of fair and exhibition.
Medical - First aid / ambulance
Personal - Space
Communication - Telephone, newspaper, reservation,
21
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
22/110
Hotel marketing in Indian Environment
The plantation of a western concept in Indian environment was made by
British, which at the initial stage served their own purposes. The Taj Mahal
hotel built by Jamshedji Nauroji Tata in Bombay in 1903 is the only
exception since till dawn of independence all hotels in India were owned and
operated by British or Swiss.
The hotel industry, particularly in the Indian context has often considered
marketing a tantamount of sale. But the business terms, specially after the
development of modem marketing concept, have classified both the terms
just to avoid confusion. The task of the hotel marketers is to make the
industry remunerate and to make available to the visitors the best possible
services. This naturally aggravates the functional responsibility of a hotel
manager of today. Today, he is expected to make an in-depth study of whatthe competitors are during, determining objectives and strategies, advertising
a promise which is genuine and credible, keeping the promises simple and
strengthening consumer oriented proposition and in formation system for
monitoring of progress.
22
The aforesaid facts make it clear that in the Indian context, the application of
marketing concept in hotel business is at the stage of infancy which
necessitates handling of problems in proper perspective so that a strong
foundation is engineered for its repaid development as industry, making
available world-class services to its users. In Indian context, it is not only
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
23/110
sufficient that we concentrate on classified hotels but also, attempt to
improve the managerial proficiency of unclassified hotels as all the tourists
or travelers are not in a position to afford the high pricing strategy of worldclass groups. With a viewpoint of promoting cosmetic tourism or social
tourism, this aspect needs priority attention.
The main thing for development of hotel industry is to encourage tourism
industry so that growing tourists influx raises the demand of hotels and
increase occupational ratio. The governmental support in terms of making
available the infrastructure facilities and offering tax holiday incentives to
up coming hotels is required to be strengthened.
Despite, the number of constraints, the future prospects of hotel industry in
India appears to be bright. Now it is upon the marketers to regulate the
intensity of business. Marketers need to have a sound inform system
regarding the need to the opening of new hotels, arrival of new competitors,
new amenities/ facilities/infrastructures being offered, price charged else
where etc, in order to satisfy their guests.
23
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
24/110
CHAPTER 2
RESEARCHDESIGN
24
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
25/110
INTRODUCTION
Hospitality or hotel industry forms a major part of the 'PURE SERVICES
segment. Hotels have come to play a vital role, supporting the life styles of
contemporary man - a keen and a compulsive traveler.
A hotel is a business enterprise having a building for accommodation that
furnishes lodging and usually provides meals, beverages and personal
services. It offers depending on its category, entertainment, and rooms for
meetings, banquet halls, ballrooms, parlors, specialty stores, lounges,
lobbies, cafes, bars and restaurant. To gain in-depth knowledge of customer
perception towards services evaluated series wise in the hotel industry with
special reference to theLe Meridien, Bangalore.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The problem has been selected to know the customers perception room wise
and series wise, the product quality that involve image, external look, price,
food quality, availability of rooms, overall experience etc. Thus by knowing
what customer expects in this hotel, the organization can change their
service pattern.
25
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
26/110
OBJ ECTIVES
The following are the objectives of this study:
1. To ascertain the quality of the room services provided in the hotel.
2. To assess the overall satisfaction level of the customer, series wise.
3. To ascertain which service is doing the best in a particular series.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The scope of the study is limited only to customers of Le Meridien,
Bangalore who have used the rooms and its services being provided by the
hotel.
METHODOLOGY
A disciplined study was undertaken to ascertain the customers perception
towards room service at Le Meridien, Bangalore. For the purpose of the
study a restricted, purposive sample survey method was used and primary
data was obtained by distributing questionnaires to the customers who have
availed the facility of room service in Le Meridien. The questionnaire
consists of open-ended and close-ended questions. Data collected was
compiled, collected and tabulated for analysis. Statistical tools were used for
analysis and findings and conclusions were arrived at. Suitable suggestions
were given based on findings and conclusions.
26
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
27/110
SAMPLING PLAN
The information was obtained from 1100 consumers, as 100% occupancy
was observed. The total population was interviewed. The consumers selected
were those who used the room service facilities. This was done so that we
could know the level of satisfaction of the consumers. The census method is
adopted.
TOOLS OF DATA COLLECTION
Primary data is collected through administering schedules to the
respondents. Secondary data was acquired through business and marketing
magazines, internet, textbooks and internal sources of information like
brochures of Le Meridien, Bangalore. The primary data was collected
through the guest satisfaction tracking system cards, which forms the
questionnaire. Fieldwork was conducted for 8 weeks in Le Meridien,
Bangalore.
27
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
28/110
LIMITATIONS
There were a few hurdles or constraints experienced while carrying out the
study. They were as follows:
1. The respondents are mainly professional who could spare very less
time for such kind of activities. The responses have a great extent of
bias.
2. This study cannot be generalized to any other 5 star hotels in or outside
Bangalore.
3. The study conducted is not representative of the entire population and
represents only a limited section.
4. Since it is an academic project it is time bound and only finite samples
could be administered.
PLAN OF ANALYSIS
A structured schedule was devised, relating to the objectives. Further,
schedules were administered on the respondents. For the convenience of the
study, basic statistical techniques such as drawing of percentages for
generalization, use of graphs and charts for better pictorial understanding,
drawing of tables for tabulation of the primary data was widely used. Finally
data was analyzed and inferences were drawn.
28
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
29/110
OVERVIEW OF CHAPTER SCHEME
Chapter 1: Introduction to hotel industry
This chapter deals with introduction to marketing concepts, service industry,
history of hotel industry and the marketing concepts of hotel industry in
Indian environment.
Chapter 2: Research DesignThe chapter deals with the objectives of the study conducted and tell us
about the scope of study, limitations, and the research area and research
methodology.
Chapter 3: Profile of Le Meridien, Bangalore
This chapter tells us about the profile of Le Meridien in terms of nature of
business, product profile, and organization structure and staff pattern.
Chapter 4: Analysis of Consumer perception of the room services
This chapter deals with the analysis and interpretation of data collected. The
collected data has been analyzed and interpreted through tables and graphs.
Chapter 5: Summary of F indings, Conclusions and Recommendations
This chapter contains the summary of the project and the information
collected through the study and recommendations that have been given to
improve the services.
29
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
30/110
CHAPTER 3
PROFILE OFLE MERIDIEN
30
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
31/110
LE MERIDIEN WORLDWIDE
Le Meridien is an award-winning hotel group with a portfolio of 130 luxury
and upscale hotels (34,000 rooms) in 56 countries worldwide. The majority
of its properties are located in the world's top cities and resorts throughout
Europe, the Americas, Asia Pacific, Africa and the Middle East.
The company also enjoys a strategic alliance with JAL-owned Nikko Hotels,
providing loyal guests access to an additional 44 properties around the
world. Le Meridien Hotels and Resorts Limited is headquartered in London.
31
Some of the world's landmark hotels are included in Le Meridien's portfolio,
including Hotel Eden, A Royal Meridien Hotel, Rome, Italy; Le Royal
Meridien Bristol, Warsaw, Poland; Le Royal Meridien King Edward,
Toronto, Canada; Dom Hotel, A Meridien Hotel, Cologne, Germany; Le
Royal Meridien Excelsior Hotel Gallia, Milan, Italy; Le Meridien Budapest,
Hungary; and Le Royal Meridien National, Moscow, Russia.
Le Meridien debuted its innovative Art + Tech design concept at several
new hotels in 2003, including Le Meridien Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA;Le Royal Meridien Hamburg, Germany; Le Meridien Vienna, Austria; and
Le Meridien Lingotto Art +Tech, Turin, Italy. Le Meridien also added new
hotels in such destinations as Palm Springs, California, USA; The Hague,
Netherlands; Jaipur, India; Kuwait and Mauritius.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
32/110
Le Meridien promises its hotel customers a hotel experience, delivered
through its four core values,
A sophisticated, elegant European style-with a French accent: La
Difference.
A high level of personal service, exciting cuisine and an extensive
range of facilities for business, conferences/meetings, banqueting
and leisure.
A respect for the local culture.
Highly trained and motivated staff, committed to providingexcellent service and anticipating the needs of the guests.
MISSION STATEMENT
As a company Le Meridien firmly believes in the individual identity of theirbusiness.
Primary aim of Le Meridien is to:
Operate profitable and sound business
Provide customer satisfaction
Seek market leadership
Offer high quality services at appropriate price
Recruit, train and develop talented people
32
Recognize and award success and achievement
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
33/110
VISION AND VALUES OF LE MERIDIEN
They are growth and result oriented whilst believing work should
be fun.
They aim for high quality of service.
They welcome and promote change as an opportunity not a threat.
They work to promote confidence in their ability to handle the
future to both their staff and their customers.
Their style is open with little emphasis of status of bureaucracy.
They encourage and support new and creative ways of doing
things.
They stress both the benefits of teamwork and the ability of each
individual to add values.
LE MERIDIEN BRAND VALUES
European with the French accent
Respect for local culture
Innovation
Care and Attention
33
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
34/110
LE MERIDIEN ART + TECH
Art + Tech Rooms at Le Meridien
At the heart of Meridians recently announced development programme is
the introduction of a dramatically different style of hotel bedroom, the Art &
Tech room, designed to offer today's increasingly sophisticated traveller the
ultimate in innovative luxury.
Concept
The creation of a space that will not only provide luxury
accommodation but an environment that will engage surprise and
intrigue Le Meridien's guests.
Using a neutral backdrop, colour is used dramatically either in painted
wall panels, soft furnishing or by the addition of coloured gels to light
fittings.
Furniture is designed and detailed using a minimal palette of
materials, pale maple, satin stainless steel and glass (clear, frosted and
etched). Surfaces are kept clear wherever possible providing a
minimalist, clutter-free feel.
34
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
35/110
Art
Backlit photographs, commissioned for Le Meridien, are set into
sections of timber panelling and an inset showcase within the console
table displays other elements of art within the room.
These elements are designed specifically for each hotel, taking
inspiration from the individual building, the locality or nearby galleries
or museums and their collections. Being unique to each hotel site
allows the concept to evolve and change and ensures that every hotel
maintains its individuality.
The headboard of the bed represents one of the strongest visual
elements in the room, featuring an edge-lit handcrafted etched glass
panel. Headboards are placed either back to the wall or into the room
acting as a divider and providing a view of the room, which for smaller
rooms gives a real sense of space.
Art + Tech
The Art +Tech room concept is underpinned by the use of technology
and meticulous detailing.
The wall-mounted Phillips 42-inch plasma screen TV houses the in-
room entertainment system providing video and music on demand, as
well as hotel information (including on-line billing).
High-speed Internet access is provided via the plasma screen, an ISDN
line or "plug and play" modem point.
35
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
36/110
Sleeping
All rooms provide the ultimate sleep experience. Specially engineered
beds and mattresses combined crisp white cotton duvets and a choice of
feather or anti-allergic pillows are provided.
Bathroom
The Art +Tech bathrooms are either shower rooms with freestanding
shower tower incorporating shower and body jets with glass screens, or
bathrooms where a large steel bath with a circular end allows a
comfortable standing area for showering.
In some rooms, where space allows, there are Victorian-style roll top
baths with drencher rose and rain bars.
An etched glass wash hand basin sits on a limestone top wash table to
match the finish of the limestone flooring.
36
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
37/110
LE MERIDIEN, BANGALORE
Address: Le Meridien Bangalore28 Sankey Road
P B No 174
Bangalore-560052
India
Tel: +91 80 22262323 / 22282828
Fax intl: (91 80) 22267676 / 22262050
Website: www.lemeridien.com
37
http://www.lemeridien.com/http://www.lemeridien.com/7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
38/110
LOCATION
Located in close proximity to the citys shopping and business centres, Le
Meridien Bangalore overlooks the golf course. It offers a panoramic view of
the Garden City. The hotel offers Le Royal Club and varied cuisine at a
choice of restaurants.
Primary Airport - Bangalore Airport
Distance from hotel - 12km
Direction from hotel Southeast
TRANSPORTATION TO THE HOTEL
The average taxi fare from the airport to the hotel is USD 15.00 (+10% tax
each way by car).
TRAVEL INFORMATION
38
Bangalore is situated in the southern central part of India, at a height of 3000
feet above sea level, and is known as India's Garden City as it is rich in
parks and tree-lined avenues. Le Meridien Bangalore is situated on Sankey
Road, a 20-minute drive from the airport.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
39/110
The hotel incorporates all the following amenities that you would expect in a
Le Meridien hotel including:
24-hour Front desk and Concierge desk
24-hour travel desk/travel and tour desk
Barber shop
Beauty salon
Bellman and porter
Business center and secretarial service
Car rental desk
Chemist/Pharmacy
Currency exchange
Disabled ramp and wheelchair access
Doctor on call
Elevators
Express check-in / check-out Florist
Gift shop
Newsstand
Non-smoking rooms
Nurse (on call)
Outdoor and indoor parking
Valet parking
Health club, fitness center and outdoor swimming pool
Laundry service
39
Tour desk
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
40/110
FEATURES
Le Meridien offers the following types of rooms to its customers;
1. Superior - all rooms were refurbished in 2001 and are available with
either a king-size or twin beds. The bedrooms are very spacious, at
approximately 32.52 square metres, and also have plenty of storage space.
All rooms can accommodate an extra bed and are very popular with our
family guests as they also interconnect to other Superior bedrooms. Thebathroom features all the amenities, with a bathtub and shower, hairdryer
and magnifying shaving mirror. Our bedrooms offer a golf course, pool or
green view. All rooms have a high security electronic locking system with
'Dialock' facility.
2. Executive Suite - these suites are elegant and spacious, with an area of
46.46 square meters, accommodating separate seating and dining areas and a
king-size bed. Ideal for both the business and leisure traveler, these suites
are also well suited for families.
40
3. Royal Club Room - these bedrooms are on Le Royal Club Executive
floor, with enhanced facilities. The entire floor is dedicated to meeting the
exacting demands of our discerning business travelers, including a separate
check-in area, express check-in and check-out facility, valet service and a
dedicated business lounge for business as well as happy hour. The bathroom
features enhanced amenities, with a bathtub and shower, hairdryer,
magnifying shaving mirror and a Jacuzzi in some rooms.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
41/110
4. Royal Club Suite - elegant and spacious rooms, with an area of 46.46
square metres, accommodating separate seating and dining areas with all the
features of Royal Club rooms.
5. Deluxe Suite - the Deluxe Suites comprise two elegant and spacious
rooms, with an area of 85.5 square metres, and are tastefully furnished with
a complimentary minibar. A few of these suites also have a kitchenette and a
separate bar counter. The bathroom features enhanced amenities with a
separate bathtub and walk-in shower
BUSINESS MATTERS
For all the business matters Le Meridien has an entire ground floor. Le
Meridien Bangalore has a choice of six convention halls to choose from.
Elegantly furnished and equipped with the latest state-of-the-art equipment
is the business center, with its two very own boardrooms.
With Le Meridien Business Class you get;
Business Class Room
Buffet Breakfast
20% discount off Business Centre services
Free local calls
Priority placement on the waiting list for early arrivals
41
Late 3pm checkout
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
42/110
Here in Le Meridien, it has the following types ofRestaurants and Bars,
they are mentioned below;
La Brasserie - overlooking the translucent swimming pool is La Brasserie,
the 24-hour multi cuisine restaurant that boasts an la carte and phenomenal
buffet spread for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Insomnia - the citys nightclub.
F-Bar & Lounge- Fashionable cocktail lounge.
Leisure facilitiesaround Le Meridien are;
Vidhana Soudha (Legislative Assembly) - 1 km
Bull Temple - 9 km
Lal Bagh Gardens - 6 km
Banerghatta National Park - 22 km Sathyasaibaba Ashram - 27 km
42
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
43/110
CHAPTER 4
ANALYSIS ANDINTERPRETATIO-N OF DATA
43
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
44/110
THE ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION TOWARDS ROOMSERVICES AT LE MERIDIEN, BANGALORE.
The information which was gathered in the process of conducting this study
has been analyzed and suitable inferences have been drawn, which have
been listed in this following chapter. Some of the variables analyzed are:
Respondents Profile
Purpose of the visit
Frequency and length of visit
The satisfaction level of all the attributes of room services-
series wise
The tables have been drawn using basic statistical techniques such as
drawing of percentages and use of graphs. The data which was collected
from primary sources have been tabulated by adopting the method of single
and bi-variant tables. After the tables have been tabulated, graphs have been
drawn for better pictorial understanding.
44
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
45/110
TABLE 1: SHOWING THE GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS.
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the number of male and female respondents. The
male respondents constituted 74% of the respondents and the remaining 26%
were female respondents.
INFERENCE:
Fromthis table we can infer that majority of the respondents were males.
45
GENDER NO. OF RESPONDENTS
814MALE
(74%)
286FEMALE
(26%)
1100TOTAL(100%)
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
46/110
GRAPH 1: SHOWING THE GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Male Female
Gender
Percentage
NO.OF
RESPONDENTS
46
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
47/110
TABLE 2: SHOWING PURPOSE OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
PURPOSE OF VISIT MALE FEMALE TOTAL
500 88BUSINESS
(61.40%) (30.80%)588
189 86CONFERENCE
(23.20%) (30.00%)
275
125 112LEISURE
(15.40%) (39.10%)237
814 286TOTAL
(100%) (100%)1100
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the purpose of visit of the male and female
respondents. Most of the male respondents purpose of visit was business i.e.
61.40% and 23.20% of them was for conference and a very low percentage
was for leisure, i.e. 15.40%. Majority of the female respondents purpose of t
visit was leisure, i.e. 39.10% and 30% was for conference purpose and
30.80% was for business purpose.
47
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
48/110
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that majority of the male respondents visit LeMeridien for business purposes and majority of the female respondents were
there for relaxation.
48
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
49/110
GRAPH 2: SHOWING THE PURPOSE OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Per
centage
Business Conference Leisure
Purpose of Visit
MaleFemale
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
50/110
TABLE 3: SHOWING THE REGULARITY OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
REGULARITY OF
VISITMALE FEMALE TOTAL
368 108FIRST TIME
(45.20%) (37.70%)476
446 178REPEATED
(54.70%) (62.20%)
624
814 286TOTAL
(100%) (100%)1100
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the number of male respondents who were visitingthe hotel for the first time which was very low 45.20%. The respondents
who had visited repeatedly were 54.70% and the female respondents who
were visiting the hotel for the first time was also very low, i.e.37.70% and
who were visiting repeatedly was 62.20% from the total respondents.
INFERENCE:
50
From this we can infer that the percentage of respondents visiting the hotel
repeatedly is high. Most of the respondents were from the corporate world
and the companies sponsor them. Thus there was regularity in visits.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
51/110
GRAPH 3: SHOWING THE REGULARITY OF VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
51
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Per
centage
Male Female
Gender
First TimeRepeat
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
52/110
TABLE 4: SHOWING THE LENGTH OF THE VISIT OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
LENGTH OF THE STAY MALE FEMALE TOTAL
572 94
1 NIGHT (70.20%) (32.80%)
666
109 86
2-4 NIGHTS (13.30%) (30.00%) 195
133 106
5 OR MORE NIGHTS(16.30%) (37.20%)
239
814 286TOTAL
(100%) (l00%)1100
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the length of the stay of male and female
respondents, in which the male respondents 70.20% of them have stayed for
a night, which is very high percentage, 13.30% stayed for 2-4 nights and a
very low percentage 16.30% stayed for more than 5 nights. The female
respondents percentage is higher in the 5 or more nights comparatively.
52
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
53/110
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the male respondents stay was usually for 1 dayas the purpose of visit was usually for business, and the female respondents
stay was for more than 4-5 nights as the purpose of their visit was usually for
leisure.
53
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
54/110
GRAPH 4: SHOWING THE LENGTH OF STAY OF THE
RESPONDENTS.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Percentage
1 Night 2- 4 Nights 5 or morenights
Length of Visit
MaleFemale
54
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
55/110
TABLE 5: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS RELATING TO VARIOUS
ATTRIBUTES OF 11 SERIES ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
55
ATTRIBUT-
ES
SATISFA-
CTION
NEUTRA
-L
DISSATISF
-ACTIONTOTAL
SATISFA-
CTIONNEUTRAL
DISSATISF-
ACTIONTOTAL
63 3 2 28 3 1DCOR OF
ROOM (92.60%) (4.40%) (2.90%)68
(87.50%) (9.30%) (3.10%)32
60 5 3 26 4 2QUALITY OF
ROOM (88.20%) (7.30%) (4.40%)68
(81.20%) (1.20%) (6.20%)32
62 4 2 27 3 2QUALITY OF
HOUSEKEEP
ING(91.10%) (5.80%) (2.90%)
68(84.30%) (9.30%) (6.20%)
32
61 5 2 26 5 1MAINTENAN
CE (89.70%) (7.30%) (2.90%)68
(81.20%) (1.50%) (3.10%)32
59 6 3 23 6 3IN-ROOM
DINING (86.70%) (8.80%) (4.40%)68
(71.80%) (1.80%) (9.30%)32
63 4 1 28 4 0APPEARANC
E OF HOTEL (92.60%) (5.80%) (1.40%)68
(87.50%) (1.20%) (0%)32
62 5 1 25 4 3VALUE FORMONEY (91.10%) (7.30%) (1.40%)
68(78.10%) (1.20%) (9.30%)
32
63 3 2 24 3 3OVERALL
SATISFACTI
ON (92.60%) (4.40%) (2.90%)68
(75.00%) (1.50%) (9.30%)32
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
56/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of various attributes of 11 series rooms.
The satisfaction level of the male respondents relating to the decor of the
room was relatively high, i.e. 92% than the female respondents was 87%.
The dissatisfaction level was very low in both the cases. The satisfaction
level relating to the quality of the room in the both the cases were 88% and
81 % respectively. The dissatisfaction level was very low, i.e. 4% and 60%.
The satisfaction level of quality of housekeeping was relatively high 91%
and the dissatisfaction level was relatively low 4%. The satisfaction level of
the male and female respondents relating to overall satisfaction was high
92% and 75% respectively. This was low compared to the dissatisfaction
level of 2% and 9% respectively.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction level of all the attributes was
relatively high in all the 11 series. The satisfaction level of appearance of the
hotel was the highest in male respondents and female respondents. The
dissatisfaction level of male and female respondents was highest relating to
in-room dinning.
56
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
57/110
GRAPH 5.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL RELATING TO VARIOUS ATTRIBUTES
OF SERIES 11 ROOMS.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Dcor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for moneyOverall satisfaction
Attributes
11 SERIES MALEsatisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
57
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
58/110
GRAPH 5.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL RELATING TO VARIOUS ATTRIBUTES
OF SERIES 11 ROOMS.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
11 SERIES FEMALEsatisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
58
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
59/110
TABLE 6: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF SERIES
12 ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
59
ATTRIBUTE
S
SATISFA
CTION
NEUTRA
L
DISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
SATISFAC
TION
NEUTRA
L
DISSATISFAC
TIONTOTAL
42 22 19 9 5 3DCOR OF
ROOM
(50.60%) (26.51 %) (22.89%)
83
(52.90%) (29.41%) (17.64%)
17
46 20 17 10 3 4QUALTIY OF
ROOM (54.42%) (24.09%) (20.50%)83
(58.83%) (17.64%) (23.53%)17
54 17 12 12 3 2QUALITY OF
HOUSEKEEP
ING (65.10%) (20.50%) (14.50%)83
(70.59%) (17.64%) (11.76%)17
58 16 9 11 4 2MAINTENAN
CE (69.90%) (19.30%) (10.90%) 83 (64.71 %) (23.53%) (11.76%) 17
49 21 13 8 4 5IN-ROOM
DINING (59.00%) (25.30%) (15.70%)83
(47.06%) (23.53%) (29.41%)17
62 13 8 7 6 4APPEARANC
E OF HOTEL (74.40%) (15.70%) (9.60%)83
(41.18%) (35.29%) (23.53%)17
56 22 5 8 3 4VALUE FORMONEY (67.50%) (26.50%) (6.02%)
83(47.06%) (17.64%) (23.53%)
17
47 21 15 6 7 4OVERALL
SATISFACTI
ON (56.70%) (25.30%) (18.07%)83
(35.29%) (41.18%) (23.53%)17
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
60/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 12 series rooms. Thesatisfaction level of the decor of the room was 50%, which is comparatively
low, and neutral was 26% and dissatisfaction was 22%. For the female
respondents the satisfaction level of decor of room was 52%, 29.41 % was
neutral and 17.65% was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction percentage of the
quality of the room was 54.42%, neutral were 24.09% and 20.05% was
dissatisfaction for the male respondents.58.83% was satisfaction, 29.41%
neutral and 17.65% was dissatisfaction of the female respondents. The
satisfaction level of housekeeping was low, which was 65.1% for the male
respondents and for female respondents it was 70.59%. The satisfaction
level of the male and female respondents for quality of housekeeping was
low, and the service received for the value of money paid was low in both
male and female respondents. Overall satisfaction had been very low for
male respondents-56.7%, neutral-25.3% and 18.07% was dissatisfaction. For
female respondents, the satisfaction level was 35.29%, 14.81% was neutral
and 23.53% was dissatisfaction.
INFERENCE:
60
From this we can infer that for the male respondents satisfaction level
relating to the appearance of the hotel and for the female respondents the
quality of housekeeping was the highest. The dissatisfaction level for the
male respondents was decor of the room and for female respondents, quality
of in-room dinning was the highest.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
61/110
GRAPH 6.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 12 SERIES ROOMS.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of
housekeeping
In-room dining
Value for
money
Attributes
12 SERIES MAL E
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
61
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
62/110
GRAPH 6.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 12 SERIES ROOMS.
62
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Overall satisfaction
Attr
ibutes
12 SERIES FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
63/110
TABLE 7: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 14
SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTES
SATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTALSATISFAC
TIONNEUTRA
LDISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
42 18 14 10 8 8DCOR OFROOM (56.80%) (24.30%) (19.00%)
74(38.40%) (30.80%) (30.80%)
26
53 12 9 12 8 6QUALITY OFROOM (71.60%) (16.20%) (12.10%)
74(46.10%) (30.80%) (23.10%)
26
46 18 10 14 7 5QUALITY OFHOUSEKEEPING (62.10%) (24.30%) (13.50%)
74(53.80%) (26.90%) (19.20%)
26
54 14 6 13 8 5MAINTENANCE (73.00%) (19.00%) (8.10%)
74(50.00%) (30.80%) (19.20%)
26
62 7 5 21 4 2IN-ROOMDINING (83.70%) (9.45%) (6.70%)
74(80.80%) (22.20%) (7.70%)
26
48 22 4 20 6 0APPEARANCE OF HOTEL (64.90%) (9.70%) (5.40%)
74(76.90%) (23.10%) (0.00%)
26
64 6 4 23 2 1VALUE FOR
MONEY (86.40%) (8.10%) (5.40%)
74
(88.50%) (7.60%) (3.80%)
26
48 19 7 17 5 4OVERALLSATISFACTION (64.90%) (25.70%) (9.50%)
74(65.45%) (19.20%) (63.20%)
26
63
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
64/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 14 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 56.8%, which is low,
neutral was 24.3% and dissatisfaction was 19%, which is relatively high. For
the female respondents the satisfaction level of decor of room was 38.4%,
which was very low, 30.8% was neutral and 30.8% was dissatisfaction,
which was very high. The satisfaction percentage of the quality of the room
was 71.6%, 16.2% was neutral and 12.1% dissatisfaction for the male
respondents. For the female respondents 46.1% was satisfaction, 30.8%
neutral and 23.1 % was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction level of
housekeeping for the male respondents were 62.1% and for female
respondents were 53.8% which was very low. The service received for the
value of money paid was high in both male and female respondents. Overallsatisfaction has been very low for male respondents which was 64.9%,
25.7% was neutral and 9.5% was dissatisfaction. For female respondents, the
satisfaction level was 65.5%, 19.2% was neutral and 22.2% was
dissatisfaction which was high comparatively.
INFERENCE:
64
From this we can infer that for the male and female respondents satisfaction
level for the value for money was highest, and dissatisfaction level relating
to the decor of room was the highest for male and female respondents.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
65/110
GRAPH 7.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of roomQuality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
14 SERIES DOWN MALE satisfactionneutral
dissatisfaction
65
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
66/110
GRAPH 7.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
66
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Overall satisfaction
Attr
ibutes
14 SERIES DOWN FEMALE
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
67/110
TABLE 8: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 14
SERIES UP ROOMS.
67
MALE FEMALEATTRIBUTES SATISFACT
IONNEUTRA
LDISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
SATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTAL
63 20 9 5 2 1DCOR OFROOM (68.40%) (21.70%) (9.70%)
92(62.50%) (25.00%) (12.50%)
8
84 6 2 4 2 2QUALITYOF ROOM (91.30%) (6.50%) (2.10%)
92(50.00%) (25.00%) (25.00%)
8
75 9 8 6 2 0QUALITYOFHOUSEKEEPING
(81.50%) (9.70%) (9.80%)92
(75.00%) (25.00%) (0.00%)8
61 20 11 7 1 0MAINTENANCE (66.30%) (21.70%) (11.90%)
92(87.50%) (12.50%) (0.00%)
8
58 19 15 6 1 1IN-ROOMDINING (63.04%) (20.70%) (16.30%)
92(75.00%) (12.50%) (12.50%)
8
72 14 16 5 2 1APPEARANCE OFHOTEL (78.30%) (15.20%) (17.30%)
92(62.50%) (25.00%) (12.50%)
8
77 8 7 4 3 1VALUEFOR
MONEY (83.75%) (8.69%) (7.60%)
92
(50.00%) (37.50%) (12.50%)
8
80 7 5 6 1 1OVERALLSATISFACTION (86.90%) (7.60%) (5.43%)
92(75.00%) (12.50%) (12.50%)
8
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
68/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level ofthe male and female respondents of the attributes of 14 series up rooms.
The satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 68.4%, which was low,
neutral was 21.7% and dissatisfaction was 9.7%. For the female respondents
the satisfaction level of decor of room was 62.5%, 25% was neutral and
12.5% was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction percentage of the quality of the
room was 91.3%, which was high, 6.5% was neutral and 2.1%
dissatisfaction for the male respondents was low. 50% satisfaction, 25%
neutral and 25% dissatisfaction was high for female respondents. The
satisfaction level of housekeeping for the male respondents were 81.5% and
for female respondents were 75% which was high. Overall satisfaction has
been very high for male respondents 86.9%, 7.6% was neutral and 5.43%
was dissatisfaction. For female respondents, the satisfaction level was 75%,
12.5% was neutral and 12.5% was dissatisfaction.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that for the male respondents the satisfaction of
quality of room and for female respondents the quality of maintenance was
the highest. The dissatisfaction level for the male respondents for quality of
in-room dinning and for the female respondents the value of money was the
highest.
68
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
69/110
GRAPH 8.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES UP ROOMS.
69
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of roomQuality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
14 SERIES UP MAL E
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
70/110
GRAPH 8.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 14 SERIES UP ROOMS.
70
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Overall satisfaction
Attr
ibutes
14 SERIES UP FEMALEsatisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
71/110
TABLE 9: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 15
SERIES UP ROOMS.
71
MALE FEMALE
ATTRIBUTES
SATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTALSATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTAL
56 8 6 20 5 5DCOR OFROOM (80.00%) (11.40%) (8.50%)
70(66.60%) (16.70%) (16.70%)
30
62 6 2 12 10 8
QUALITY OFROOM (88.50%) (8.50%) (2.85%)70
(40.00%) (33.30%) (26.70%)30
60 7 3 17 7 6QUALITY OFHOUSEKEEPING (85.70%) (10.00%) (4.20%)
70(56.70%) (23.30%) (20.00%)
30
48 20 2 21 5 4MAINTENENANCE (68.50%) (28.50%) (2.85%)
70(70.00%) (16.70%) (13.30%)
30
41 19 10 14 8 8IN-ROOMDINING (58.50%) (27.10%) (14.30%)
70(46.70%) (26.70%) (26.70%)
30
54 9 7 16 9 5APPEARANCE OF HOTEL (77.10%) (12.80%) (10.00%)
70(53.30%) (30.00%) (16.70%)
30
52 10 8 20 6 4VALUE FORMONEY (74.20%) (14.30%) (11.40%)
70(66.60%) (20.00%) (13.30%)
30
51 12 7 18 7 5RECOMMENADTION (72.80%) (17.14%) (10.00%)
70(60.00%) (23.30%) (16.70%)
30
63 6 1 19 8 3OVERALLSATISFACTION (90.00%) (8.50%) (1.42%)
70(63.30%) (26.70%) (10.00%)
30
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
72/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 15 series rooms. The
satisfaction level of the decor of the room was 56%, which was low, neutral
was 11.4% and dissatisfaction was 8.5%. For the female respondents the
satisfaction level of decor of room was 66.6%, 16.7% was neutral and 16.7%
was dissatisfaction. The satisfaction percentage of the quality of the room
was 88.5%, which was high, 8.5% was neutral and 2.85% was
dissatisfaction for the male respondents, which was low. 40% satisfaction,
33.3% neutral and 26.7% dissatisfaction was high for female respondents.
The satisfaction level of housekeeping for the male respondents was 85.7%
and for female respondents it was 56.7%, which was comparatively low. The
quality of maintenance was average in both the cases. Overall satisfaction
for male respondents was 90%, 8.5% was neutral and 1.42% wasdissatisfaction. For female respondents, the satisfaction level was 63.3%,
26.7% was neutral and 3% was dissatisfaction.
INFERENCE:
72
From this we can infer that for the male respondents the overall satisfaction
was the highest and for female respondents the quality of maintenance was
the highest. The dissatisfaction level for male respondents was value of
money paid and for female respondents the quality of room was the highest.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
73/110
GRAPH 9.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 15 SERIES UP ROOMS.
73
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality ofhousekeeping
In-room dining
Value for money
Overall
satisfaction
Attributes
15 SERIES UP MAL E
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
74/110
GRAPH 9.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 15 SERIES UP ROOMS.
74
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeepingMaintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
15 SERIES UP FEMALEsatisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
75/110
TABLE 10: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF
16 SERIES DOWN ROOMS
MALE FEMALE
75
ATTRIBUTES
SATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTALSATISFACT
IONNEUTRA
LDISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
65 7 7 18 3 0DCOR OFROOM (82.20%) (8.80%) (8.80%)
79(85.70%) (14.20%) (0.00%)
21
72 5 2 16 3 2QUALITY OFROOM (91.10%) (6.30%) (2.50%)
79(76.10%) (14.20%) (9.50%)
21
74 3 2 12 5 4QUALITY OFHOUSEKEEPING (93.60%) (3.70%) (2.50%)
79(57.10%) (23.80%) (19.00%)
21
68 6 5 14 5 2MAINTENENCE (86.10%) (7.50%) (6.30%)
79(66.60%) (23.80%) (9.50%)
21
67 6 6 17 3 1IN-ROOMDINING (84.80%) (7.50%) (7.50%)
79(80.90%) (14.20%) (4.70%)
21
63 9 7 16 4 1APPEARANCE OF HOTEL (79.70%) (11.30%) (8.80%)
79(76.10%) (19.00%) (4.70%)
21
64 9 6 13 5 3VALUE FORMONEY (81%) (11.30%) (7.50%)
79(61.90%) (23.80%) (14.20%)
21
70 5 4 19 2 0RECOMMEANDATION (88.60%) (6.30%) (5.10%)
79(90.50%) (9.50%) (0.00%)
21
69 5 5 18 2 1OVERALLSATISFACTION (87.30%) (6.30%) (6.30%)
79(85.70%) (9.50%) (4.70%)
21
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
76/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 16 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of male respondents for decor of room was 82.2%,
which was high, 85.7% was for female respondents which was also high,
and the dissatisfaction level was nil. The satisfaction level of quality of room
was 91%, for female respondents it was 76.1 % which was also high. The
male respondents were satisfied with the quality of housekeeping but forfemale respondents it was comparatively low. The satisfaction level of
quality of maintenance and quality of in-room dinning of male respondents
was relatively high but for female respondents the quality of maintenance
was low and the in-room dinning was almost the same. Satisfaction level of
appearance of hotel for male respondents was 79.7% and for female
respondents it was 76.1%, which was good. The services received for the
value of money paid was satisfactory in both the cases. The overall
satisfaction level for male respondents was 87.3% and for female
respondents it was 85.7% which was high in both the cases.
INFERENCE:
76
From this we can infer that the male respondents, satisfaction level relating
to the quality of housekeeping and for female respondents the decor of the
room was the highest. The dissatisfaction level of quality of maintenance
was high in both the cases.
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
77/110
GRAPH 10.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.16 SERIES DOWN MALE
77
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeepingMaintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
78/110
GRAPH 10.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
16 SERIES DOWN FEMALE
78
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
79/110
TABLE 11: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS 0F THE A TTRIB UTES OF
16 SERIES UP ROOMS
MALE FEMALEATTRIBUTES SATISFACT
IONNEUTRA
LDISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
SATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTAL
52 8 7 25 4 4DCOR OFROOM (77.60%) (11.90%) (10.40%)
67(75.70%) (12.10%) (12.10%)
33
48 10 9 18 8 7
QUALITY OFROOM (71.60%) (14.90%) (13.40%)67
(54.50%) (24.20%) (21.10%)33
63 2 2 21 6 6QUALITY OFHOUSEKEEPING (94.00%) (2.98%) (2.98%)
67(63.60%) (18.10%) (18.10%)
33
46 11 10 24 5 4MAINTENENCE (68.60%) (16.40%) (14.90%)
67(72.70%) (15.15%) (12.10%)
33
54 8 5 28 3 2IN-ROOMDINING (80.50%) (11.90%) (7.50%)
67(84.80%) (9.09%) (6.06%)
33
60 5 2 20 7 6APPEARANCE OF HOTEL (89.50%) (7.46%) (2.98%)
67(60.60%) (21.20%) (18.10%)
33
53 7 7 19 9 5VALUE FORMONEY (79.10%) (10.40%) (10.40%)
67(57.50%) (27.20%) (15.15%)
33
56 6 5 23 5 5RECOMMENDATION (83.50%) (8.90%) (7.50%)
67(69.60%) (15.15%) (15.15%)
33
57 5 5 27 4 2OVERALLSATISFACTION (85.00%) (7.50%) (7.50%)
67(81.80%) (12.10%) (6.06%)
33
79
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
80/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 16 series up rooms. The
satisfaction level of decor of room was 77.6% for male respondents and
75.7% for female respondents. The satisfaction level of quality of room was
71.6% for male respondents and for females it was 54.5% which was low
comparatively. The satisfaction level of quality of housekeeping of male
respondents was 94% and for female respondents it was 63.3% which was
comparatively very low. The dissatisfaction was 18.1 % which was high in
this case. The dissatisfaction level of maintenance was high in male
respondents 14.9% and for female respondents was 72.7%. The in-room
dinning in both the cases was high i.e. 80.5% and 84.8% respectively. The
overall satisfaction for male respondents was 85% and for female
respondents it was 81.8%, which was high in both the cases.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction level of male respondents
relating to the appearance of hotel and female respondents relating to the
quality of in-room dinning was the highest. The dissatisfaction level of male
respondents in quality of maintenance and for female respondents the quality
of room was the highest.
80
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
81/110
GRAPH 11.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES UP ROOMS.16 SERIES UP MALE
81
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
MaintenanceIn-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
82/110
GRAPH 11.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 16 SERIES UP ROOMS.16 SERIES UP FEMALE
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
RecommendationOverall satisfaction
Attributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
82
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
83/110
TABLE 12: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF
17 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
83
MALE FEMALEATTRIBUTES
SATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTALSATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTAL
58 4 2 26 3 2DCOR OFROOM (90.60%) (6.20%) (3.10%)
64(83.80%) (9.60%) (6.50%)
31
60 4 0 20 7 4
QUALITY OFROOM (93.70%) (6.20%) (0%)64
(64.50%) (22.50%) (12.90%)31
59 4 1 24 4 3QUALITY OFHOUSEKEEPING (92.10%) (6.20%) (1.50%)
64(77.40%) (12.90%) (9.60%
31
54 7 3 19 7 5MAINTENENANCE (84.30%) (10.90%) (4.60%)
64(61.20%) (22.50%) (16.10%)
31
53 7 4 18 8 5IN-ROOMDINING (82.80%) (10.90%) (6.20%)
64(58.06%) (25.80%) (16.10%)
31
50 8 6 24 5 2APPEARANCE OF HOTEL (78.10%) (12.50%) (9.30%)
64(77.40%) (16.10%) (6.50%)
31
53 8 3 20 8 3VALUE FORMONEY (82.80%) (12.50%) (4.60%)
64(64.50%) (25.80%) (9.60%)
31
51 7 6 16 12 6RECOMMENDATION (69.60%) (10.90%) (9.30%)
64(51.60%) (38.70%) (19.30%)
31
57 5 2 24 6 4OVERALLSATISFACTION (89.06%) (7.80%) (3.10%)
64(77.40%) (19.30%) (12.90%)
31
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
84/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 17 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of male respondents relating to the quality of room
was 90.6% and for female respondents it was 83.8%, which was very high.
Satisfaction level of male respondent for quality of room was 93.7% and
dissatisfaction level was nil. For female respondents the dissatisfaction level
had been high 12.9% and quality of housekeeping was also high. It was92.1% for male respondents and for female respondents it was 77.4% and
12.9% were neutral. The quality of housekeeping for male respondents was
92.1%, which was relatively high compared to female respondents. The
dissatisfaction level had been high, which was 16.1%. The satisfaction level
of male respondents for quality of in-room dinning had also been high which
was 82.8% and was low for female respondents at 58.06%. The satisfaction
level for the appearance of the hotel was the same in both the cases. The
overall satisfaction for male respondents was 89.06% and for females it was
77.4%.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction level of male respondentsrelating to quality of room and for female respondents relating to the decor
of room was the highest. The dissatisfaction was high relating to the
appearance of hotel in both the cases.
84
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
85/110
GRAPH 12.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
17 SERIES DOWN MALE
85
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Att
ributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
86/110
GRAPH 12.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
17 SERIES DOWN FEMALE
86
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
87/110
TABLE 13: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE MALE
AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF 17 SERIES UP
ROOMS.
87
MALE FEMALEATTRIBUTES SATISFACT
IONNEUTRA
LDISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
SATISFACTION
NEUTRAL
DISSATISFACTION
TOTAL
68 3 1 24 2 2DCOR OFROOM (94.40%) (4.16%) (1.38%)
72(85.70%) (7.10%) (7.10%)
28
64 5 3 27 1 0QUALITY OFROOM (88.80%) (6.94%) (4.16%)
72(96.40%) (3.50%) (0.00%)
28
67 3 2 21 5 2QUALITY OFHOUSEKEEPING (93.10%) (4.16%) (2.70%)
72(75.00%) (17.80%) (7.10%)
28
58 8 6 19 5 4MAINENANCE (80.50%) (11.10%) (8.30%)
72
(67.80%) (17.80%) (14.20%)
28
60 6 6 20 6 2IN-ROOMDINING (83.30%) (8.30%) (8.30%)
72(71.40%) (21.40%) (7.10%)
28
65 6 1 18 5 5APPEARANCE OF HOTEL (90.27%) (8.30%) (1.30%)
72(64.20%) (17.80%) (17.80%)
28
64 4 4 16 7 5VALUE FORMONEY (88.80%) (5.50%) (5.50%)
72(57.10%) (25.00%) (17.80%)
28
68 2 2 23 3 2RECOMMEANDATION (94.40%) (2.70%) (2.70%)
72(82.10%) (10.70%) (7.10%)
28
67 3 2 17 7 4OVERALLSATISFACTION (93.10%) (4.16%) (2.70%)
72
(60.70%) (25.00%) (14.20%)
28
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
88/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 17 series up rooms. The
satisfaction level of male respondents of decor of the rooms was 94.4% andthe female respondents were 85.7%, which was high in both the cases. The
quality of rooms for male respondents was 88.8% and for female it was
96.4% which was also very high. The dissatisfaction level was also nil in
this case. The male respondents quality of housekeeping was 93.1% and for
females it was 75%, 17.8% was neutral and 7.1% was dissatisfaction. The
maintenance for female respondents was 67.8%. The dissatisfaction was
very high, which was 14.2%. The in-room dinning of male respondents was
83.3%, 8.3% was neutral and 8.3% was dissatisfaction. For female
respondents satisfaction level was 71.4%, 21.4% was neutral and 7.1% was
dissatisfaction. The satisfaction level of male respondents relating to
appearance of hotel was 90.27%, which was very high, and 1.3% was
dissatisfaction, which was very low. The female respondents satisfaction
percentage was 64.2%, 17.8% was neutral and 17.8% was dissatisfaction.
The value for money paid in both the cases was high. The overall
satisfaction for male respondents was 93.1% and for female respondents it
was 60.7%and dissatisfaction was 14.2%.
INFERENCE:
From this we can infer that the satisfaction percentage of male respondents
in decor of room and female respondents in quality of room was highest.
The dissatisfaction level of quality of maintenance was highest in both the
cases.
88
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
89/110
GRAPH 13.1: SHOWING THE MALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES UP ROOMS.
17 SERIES UP MALE
89
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeeping
Maintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
90/110
GRAPH 13.2: SHOWING THE FEMALE RESPONDENTS
SATISFACTION LEVEL IN PERCENTAGE OF THE ATTRIBUTES
OF 17 SERIES UP ROOMS.
17 SERIES UP FEMALE
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage
Decor of room
Quality of room
Quality of housekeepingMaintenance
In-room dining
Appearance of hotel
Value for money
Recommendation
Overall satisfaction
Attributes
satisfaction
neutral
dissatisfaction
90
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
91/110
TABLE 14: SHOWING THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE
MALE AND FEMALE RESPONDENTS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF
18 SERIES DOWN ROOMS.
MALE FEMALE
91
ATTRIBUTE
S
SATISFAC
TI ON
NEUTRA
L
DISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
SATISFACT
IONNEUTRAL
DISSATISFA
CTIONTOTAL
65 6 5 20 3 1DCOR OF
ROOM (85.50%) (7.89%) (6.57%)76
(83.30%) (12.50%) (4.10%)24
60 11 5 21 2 1QUALITY OF
ROOM (78.90%) (14.40%) (6.57%)76
(87.00%) (8.30%) (4.10%)24
58 10 8 18 4 2QUALTIY OF
HOUSEKEEPI
NG (76.31%) (13.15%) (10.50%)76
(75.00%) (16.70%) (8.30%)24
70 4 2 16 6 2MAINTENAN
CE (92.10%) (5.26%) (2.63%)76
(66.70%) (25.00%) (8.30%)24
69 6 1 17 5 2IN-ROOM
DINING (90.70%) (7.89%) (1.30%)76
(70.80%) (20.80%) (8.30%)24
56 15 5 15 6 3APPEARANC
E OF HOTEL (73.60%) (19.70%) (6.57%)76
(62.50%) (25.00%) (12.50%)24
54 19 3 13 7 4VALUE FOR
MONEY (71.10%) (25.00%) (3.90%)76
(54.10%) (29.10%) (16.70%)24
61 8 7 14 8 2REOMMEND
ATION (80.30%) (10.50%) (9.21 %)76
(58.30%) (33.30%) (8.30%)24
57 14 5 22 2 0OVERALL
SATISFACTIO
N (75%) (18.40%) (6.50%)76
(91.70%) (8.30%) (0.00%)24
7/29/2019 project on consumer satisfaction
92/110
ANALYSIS:
The above table shows the satisfaction, neutral, and dissatisfaction level of
the male and female respondents of the attributes of 18 series down rooms.
The satisfaction level of male respondents of decor of room was 85.5%,
7.89% was neutral and 6.57% was dissatisfaction. The female respondents
satisfaction level was 83.3%, 12.5% was neutral and 4.1% was
dissatisfaction. The satisfaction level of quality of room of male respondents
was 78.9% and for females it was high in both the cases. The satisfaction
level of quality of housekeeping of male respondents was 76.31%, 13.15%neutral, which was high. For female respondents it was 75% satisfaction,
16.7% was neutral, which was high, and 8.3% dissatisfaction. Satisfaction
level of male respondents of quality of maintenance was highest i.e. 92.7%
but for female respondents it was 66.7% and 25% was neutral which was a
very high percentage. The dissatisfaction level of appearance of hotel of
female respondents was high at 12.5% for and male respondents it was
6.57%. The overall satisfaction level of male respondents was 75% which
was low and 18.4% was neutral. For female