Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Slide 1 Dr. John R. Barr, Motorola

September 2002Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Submission Title: [WG-TG3 closing Report Sept02]

Date Submitted: [12Sept02]

Source: [John Barr] Company [Motorola]Address [1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schuamburg, IL 60196]Voice:[+1 847 576-8706], FAX: [+1 847 576-6758], E-Mail:[[email protected]]

Re: [02338r4P802-15_TG3-Sept02-Meeting-Objective-and-Agenda.xls]

Abstract: [TG3 Chair Report to 802.15 WG]

Purpose: [TG3 chair report to WG to update them on work completed in Vancouver.]

Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by 802.15.

September 2002

Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks

TG3 Closing ReportSeptember 2002, Monterey, CA

USA

802.15

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Agenda

• Goals of September Meeting

• Letter Ballot Status

• Motion for Recirculation Letter Ballot

• October 7-9 BRC Meeting

• Goals for November Meeting

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Goals for September

Conference call status, including approval of any ad hoc business.

+ Letter Ballot Comment resolution

• Update Draft as Required (D11)

• Ballot Recirculation

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB12 Results

• 75 out of 89 voters returned a ballot

• 41 voted yes (66.1 %)

• 21 voted no (33.9 %)

• 4 abstained (6.1 % of total votes)

• 58 resolved yes (93.5 %)

• 4 unsatisfied resolution (6.5 %)

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB12 No Voter Status

NO (22) E T TR Total Reply Status Unsatisfied Resolution1 Akahane 27 - 2 29 Resolved2 Bain 24 23 9 56 Resolved3 Chen, KC 3 - 6 9 Resolved4 Dydyk 3 3 - 6 Resolved5 Golmie - 1 - 1 Resolved6 Huang 23 4 13 40 Resolved7 Lansford - 1 - 1 Resolved Signed off on hard copy.8 Rofheart - - 3 3 Resolved9 Young 5 2 12 19 Resolved

10 Cypher 2 - 6 8 Unresolved # 8911 Gubbi 24 - 42 66 Unresolved 24 unsatisfied (No response)12 Chen, HK 3 - 6 9 Unresolved # 175413 DuVal 59 26 10 95 Resolved14 Heberling 33 83 59 175 Resolved15 Herold - 1 - 1 Resolved16 Kerry - 1 - 1 Resolved Signed off on hard copy.17 Kleindl 29 6 17 52 Resolved18 Liang - 2 - 2 Resolved19 Roberts 142 154 135 431 Resolved20 Seals - 1 4 5 Resolved Signed off on hard copy.21 Shellhammer - 3 7 10 Resolved22 Shvodian 124 83 170 377 Unresolved #1629 & #1648

Total 501 394 501 1396

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB17 ResultsJune 12 – July 2

• 75 out of 89 voters• 64 voted yes (87.7 %)• 9 voted no (12.3 %)• 2 abstained (2.7 % of total votes)• Participation (84.3 %)• 67 resolved yes (91.7 %)• 6 unsatisfied resolution (8.3 %)

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB17 Comment Status

E T TR E T TR1 Allen Y/C 11 0 0 11 02 Bain N 53 37 10 100 2 925 and 9433 Barr Y/C 8 0 0 8 0 04 HK Chen 0 05 Cypher N Cypher 1 2 1 4 0 06 Gifford Y/C 57 0 0 57 07 Gilb N 272 38 94 404 08 Gubbi 0 4 496, 540, 536, 548

9 Heberling N 110 6 208 324 656, 109, 150, 180, 186, 372

10 Rasor N 6 0 26 32 1 100911 Roberts Y/C 50 3 1 54 012 Schrader N 1 1 9 11 1 115913 Shellhamer Y/C 0 8 0 8 014 Shvodian N Shvodian 55 33 96 184 3 823, 875, 878

624 128 445 1197 17

LB17 VoterLB12 Unresolved

CommentsTotalComments Unresolved

Vote

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB19 ResultsAugust 12 – September 8

• 75 out of 89 voters

• 66 voted yes (89.2 %)

• 8 voted no (10.8%)

• 1 abstained (1.3 % of total votes)

• Participation (84.3 %)

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB19 Comment Status

E T TR E T TR1 Herold Y/C 3 0 0 3 02 Bain N 20 17 1 38 7 13 Barr N 4 1 5 10 0 16 Gifford Y/C 6 0 0 6 07 Gilb N 7 6 99 112 1 258 Gubbi N Gubbi 33 23 71 127 4 339 Heberling N 77 24 114 215 5 38

11 Roberts N 0 0 5 5 0 212 Schrader N 1 1 13 15 1 1314 Shvodian N Shvodian 2 0 18 20 0 4

153 72 326 551 18 117

LB19 VoterLB12/LB17 Unresolved

CommentsTotalComments Unresolved

Vote

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB12 – LB19 Comparison

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

E T TR

LB12 LB17 LB19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

YES NO Abstain

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

LB19 Comment Resolution Process• Ballot Resolution Committee Formed

– Comment resolution in Monterey– Email comment resolution until ad hoc– October 7-9 ad hoc meeting in San Diego

• Major Issues Resolved in Monterey– ACL moved to Security Manager– Bit ordering resolved– Only two security modes (on or off)– Handover of ACL information

• Editorial comments to be resolved by editor• 10-day recirculation prior to November plenary

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

802.15.3 Ballot Resolution Committee

• Chair: James P. Gilb• Members:

– Jim Allen– Jay Bain– John Barr– Al Heberling– Bob Huang– Jeyhan Karaoguz– Mark Schrader– Bill Shvodian

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Next Steps• Conference Calls

– 10AM C(hair)T Tuesdays starting October 1– BRC calls

• September 17, 18, 20, 24, 26• October 1, 3

• Resolve comments and prepare for final recirculation– Complete resolution and draft editing– Post interim version for review– Final edits and post for recirculation ballot

• Final comment resolution and preparation for sponsor ballot at November plenary Meeting.

• Party in Hawaii!!!

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Motion to Authorize Recirculation Ballot

• Motion: Authorize 802.15 TG3 10-day recirculation letter ballot following BRC completion of comment resolution for LB19. Starting no sooner than October 21 and no later than October 31.

• TG3 Motion–Allen, 2nd –Gilb, Passed - UConsent• Moved: John Barr• Second: James Gilb• Vote: yy/nn/aa Motion xxxx

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Goals for November

• Conference call status, including approval of any ad hoc business.

• Letter ballot comment resolution.

• Update draft as required.

• Obtain approval to go to sponsor ballot!

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

October 7-9 BRC Meeting

• Sponsored by Appairent, San Diego, CA

• 1PM October 7 through Noon October 9

• Objectives:– BRC comment resolution– Editing of draft for recirculation

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Publicity Committee Input• Major revision of IEEE 802.15.3 draft

standard prepared for evaluation by the 802.15 Working Group.

• Successful letter ballot with 89% approval.

• Initial comment resolution performed with resolution of last major issues remaining prior to sponsor ballot.

• IEEE 802.15.3 expected to be released for sponsor ballot in November, 2002.

September 2002


doc.: IEEE 802.15-02/354r0

Submission

Montereh?

Documents

Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)