Upload
milo-caldwell
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Presentation Overview
• We will be presenting problems and solutions for two different projects at the Dallas Zoo.– Project 1: Reduce or disguise excessive internal
maintenance vehicle traffic.– Project 2: Present ideas for a more secure perimeter
gating system.
Current Internal Vehicle Traffic
• The Dallas Zoo has an enormous amount of interaction between the visitors and the zoo vehicles in Zoo North.
• During zoo hours, the internal vehicles range from golf carts and Daihatsu’s (off-road vehicles) to half-ton trucks (road vehicles).
• These vehicles frequently interrupt pedestrian traffic as the following two slides will illustrate.
Off-Road Vehicles
• The off-road vehicles such as golf carts and Daihatsu’s do not have a set pattern or starting point and cannot be re-routed outside the zoo.– We suggest that these vehicles should be disguised for visitors
viewing pleasure.
– Here are a couple of examples.
Road Vehicles
• We have designed an external routing system for road vehicles using the Shortest-Path Model with a distance factor versus a disturbance factor.
• The objective was to find the smallest amount of disturbance from each origin(node) to the destination.
3
6
7
4
21
5
9
810
Employee Gate
(7,633)
( - , 0)
(4,438)
(7, 369)
(5,805)
(7, 422)
(6,234)
(7,424)
(5, 663)
(8, 851)
[100%]
[100%]
[0%]
[95%]
[95%]
[95%]
[100%]
[100%]
[90%]
[90%]
[90%]
[90%]
ROUTING DISTANCE VS. DISTURBANCE FROM EMPLOYEE GATE
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
NODES
MIL
ES
DISTANCE 1 0.509 0.277 0.401 0.251 0.267 0.148 0.268 0.452 0.325
DISTURBANCE 1 290 295 200 200 200 100 200 290 290
DISTANCE 2 1.8 1.8 0.8 1.8 2.04 0.148 10.06 10.13 10
DISTURBANCE 2 0 0 0 95 90 100 90 90 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Current Gating System
• The Dallas Zoo currently secures all gates with padlocks.
• The policy of the Dallas Zoo states that gates should be locked at all times.
• Unfortunately this policy is not upheld or enforced creating:– easy and free access into the zoo– a weak second barrier for animal containment
Gates Left Open and/or Unlocked
• After extensive visits we noticed the same gates being left unlocked.
• Of the 5 gates surrounding the outside perimeter of Zoo North, 2 of the 5 gates were frequently left open.
• Also, 4 of the 5 gates were usually left unlocked • Gates referenced:
– Employee Gate on Clarendon– Havendon– Page Street– Page Street (Construction Gate)– Marsalis
Our observations show a 40% chance of a loose animal escaping, and an 80% chance of someone entering for free.
These percentages show that Zoo North is an extremely ineffective perimeter Here are a few pictures to demonstrate.
60
40
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percentage of Closed/ Open Perimeter Gates in Zoo North
Closed Gates Open Gates
20
80
0
20
40
60
80
100
Percentage of Locked/ Unlocked Perimeter Gates in Zoo North
Locked Gates Unlocked Gates
Researching Gating Alternatives
• We did extensive research on alternatives for making the gates stay closed, locked, and secured.
• Our research consisted of contacting several different gating and fencing companies along with an extensive Internet search.
• We would like to recommend two local companies that were quite helpful in our research effort:– Jeff Goodwin at Southwest Automated Security– Chris Brown at Fence Supply Inc.
We recommend using the existing swing gates and adding automation. Which consists of:
1. A swing gate operator 6. Inductive Loops
2. A control panel 7. An exit switch
3. An entrance switch 8. Gate stops
4. Reversing Loops 9. Warning lights
5. Photocell
Six Decisions on Selecting a Gate Operator
• What direction should the gate swing, inward or outward?
• How many degrees of swing are required? This is usually 90 degrees.
• What type of mounting geometry or placement is needed for the swing gate arm to achieve the desired effects?
• What type of internal locking is needed, “gate safe” or “gate secure”?
• What speed should the gate leaf travel? This depends on the length of the gate leaf.
• How many operations per hour, or in other words how many times will each gate open and close?
Initial Ideas
• In deciding recommendations for each gate, we initially wanted to recommend a barrier arm with a card reader for the employee entrance. This was much more expensive and hard to maintain because each card cost $4.
• We also considered solar powered gating systems, but they were not recommended for industrial use.
• Sliding gates were another option, but retrofitting an existing swing gate would be more expensive than using the original swing gate.
Recommendations
• We recommend utilizing Station 1, which is currently an office that is manned 8:00a.m. to 6:00p.m. 7 days a week for any future intercom or closed-circuit television installed.
• We have eight gates that we recommend for automation.
• Gate 1: Employee Gate on Clarendon– recommend automating the existing swinging gate– install a digital keypad with an intercom– possibly install closed-circuit television
Recommendations Cont.
• Page Street (Current Intercom)• Page Street (Construction Gate)• Havendon • Marsalis (Construction Gate)
– automate the existing swing gates– install an intercom with closed-circuit
television– possibly install digital keypad with intercom
Recommendations Cont.
• Subway Gate, internal gate between employee entrance and the zoo
• 15th Street• Gate under Marsalis by visitor entrance
– Automate the current swing gate and install loops detectors that allow automatic entry by detecting a magnetic field of an automobile.
Conclusion and Recommendations
• We recommend utilizing an external path for road vehicles to reduce disturbance.
• Off-road vehicles should be decorated to create a more enjoyable atmosphere.
• Perimeter swing gates are recommended for automation to increase security and to prevent future lost revenue.