Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Project 2010-17 Definition of jBulk Electric SystemStandards and Compliance Workshopp p
October 27, 2011P t H id i h FRCC BES D fi iti D fti T Ch iPeter Heidrich, FRCC, BES Definition Drafting Team ChairCarter Edge, SERC, ROP Drafting Team Chair
Topics
• Expanded Project Plan
• Bulk Electric System (BES) Definition Initial Ballot Results
Cl ifi ti Clarifications
• ROP Exception Process (Appendix 5C)
E ti A li ti F• Exception Application Form Initial Ballot Results
Clarifications Clarifications
• Implementation Plan
• Near term Project Milestones
2 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
• Near‐term Project Milestones
Project Plan - Phased Approach
Phase 1 ‐ Addresses directives from Orders N 743 & 743 ANo. 743 & 743‐A:
1. Modify the Definition of Bulk Electric System
Eliminate “as defined by Regions” language
Eliminate “generally defined as” languageg y g g
2. Develop an Exception Process
3 Develop Regional Transition Plans3. Develop Regional Transition Plans
4. Filing Due Date of January 25, 2012
3 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Project Plan - Phased Approach
Phase 2 ‐ Addresses concerns identified through the Standards Developmentthrough the Standards Development Process:
1. Reliability benefit of a contiguous BES
2. 100 kV bright‐line voltage threshold
3. ‘Points of Demarcation’ between Transmission, Generation, and Distribution
4. Threshold for Generation Resources
4 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Project Plan - Phased Approach
Phase 2 ‐ Addresses concerns identified h h h d d lthrough the Standards Development Process:
5. Scope of the equipment which supports the reliable operation of the BES
6. Relationship between the BES definition and the ERO Statement of Compliance Registry Criteria
7. Analysis of the application of, and the results from, the Exception Process
5 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Project Plan – Phased Approach
• Why two phases?f l h l f l f A strong, factual, technical justification is essential if we are
to gain FERC approval for any changes to things such as generator thresholdsg
Need time to run studies and produce technical justifications to support proposals
BES definition due January 25, 2012
6 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Project Plan – Phased Approach
• DRAFT Standard Authorization Requestbl h h f h Establishes Phase 2 of the project
Posted for informational purposes ONLY
Will be posted for comment later in the project Will be posted for comment later in the project
7 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Project Plan – Phased Approach
• NERC Standards Committeed h l h d h Approved the multi‐phased approach
Committed to keeping this project on its “High Priority” project listproject list
Committed to continuing development work with the current SDT through completion of Phase 2
Committed to supplying resources to complete technical research
8 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Project Plan – Phased Approach
• Additional Informationlk l f h Bulk Electric System Definition Project – Fact Sheet
http://www.nerc.com/docs/standards/sar/BES_DefinitionF Sh 20110920 fi l df_Fact_Sheet_20110920_final.pdf
9 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Initial Ballot Results
• BES Definition Ballot Results% Quorum: 92.97%
Approval: 71.68%
• Comments from 255 different people from 156• Comments from 255 different people from 156 companies representing 10 of the 10 industry segmentssegments
10 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Definition – Clarifying Revisions
• Transformer Designations
• Generation Threshold Values
• Reactive Resources
• Behind the Meter Generation
• Local Networks
11 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Bulk Electric System Definition
Core Definition
lk l ( )Bulk Electric System (BES):
Unless modified by the lists shown below, all Transmission y ,Elements operated at 100 kV or higher and Real Power and Reactive Power resources connected at 100 kV or higher. This does not include facilities used in the local distribution of electricdoes not include facilities used in the local distribution of electric energy.
12 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaInclusions
BES Designation Criteria
I1 ‐ Transformers with the primary terminal and at least one secondary terminal operated at 100 kV or higher unless excluded
d E l i E1 E3under Exclusion E1 or E3.
13 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaInclusions
I2 Generating resource(s) with gross individual nameplate rating
BES Designation Criteria
I2 ‐ Generating resource(s) with gross individual nameplate rating greater than 20 MVA or gross plant/facility aggregate nameplate rating greater than 75 MVA including the generator terminals through the high‐side of the step‐up transformer(s) connected at a voltage of 100 kV or above.
14 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaInclusions
BES Designation Criteria
I3 ‐ Blackstart Resources identified in the Transmission Operator’s restoration plan. p
15 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaInclusions
I4 Dispersed power producing resources with aggregate capacity
BES Designation Criteria
I4 ‐ Dispersed power producing resources with aggregate capacity greater than 75 MVA (gross aggregate nameplate rating) utilizing a system designed primarily for aggregating capacity, connected at a common point at a voltage of 100 kV or above.
16 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaInclusions
I5 –Static or dynamic devices (excluding generators) dedicated to
BES Designation Criteria
I5 Static or dynamic devices (excluding generators) dedicated to supplying or absorbing Reactive Power that are connected at 100 kV or higher, or through a dedicated transformer with a high‐side lt f 100 kV hi h th h t f th t ivoltage of 100 kV or higher, or through a transformer that is
designated in Inclusion I1.
17 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaExclusions
BES Designation Criteria
E1 ‐ Radial systems: A group of contiguous transmission Elements that emanates from a single point of connection of 100 kV or higher and:
a) Only serves Load. Or, b) Only includes generation resources, not identified in Inclusion I3, with an aggregate capacity less than or equal to 75 MVA (gross nameplate rating). Or, c) Where the radial system serves Load and includes generation resources, not identified in Inclusion I3 with an aggregate capacity of non retailnot identified in Inclusion I3, with an aggregate capacity of non‐retail generation less than or equal to 75 MVA (gross nameplate rating).
Note A normally open switching device between radial systems as depicted
18 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Note – A normally open switching device between radial systems, as depicted on prints or one‐line diagrams for example, does not affect this exclusion.
BES Designation CriteriaExclusions
BES Designation Criteria
E2 ‐ A generating unit or multiple generating units on the customer’s side of the retail meter that serve all or part of thecustomer s side of the retail meter that serve all or part of theretail Load with electric energy if: (i) the net capacity provided to the BES does not exceed 75 MVA, and (ii) standby, back‐up, and
i t i id d t th ti itmaintenance power services are provided to the generating unit or multiple generating units or to the retail Load by a Balancing Authority, or provided pursuant to a binding obligation with a Generator Owner or Generator Operator, or under terms approved by the applicable regulatory authority.
19 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaExclusions
BES Designation Criteria
E3 ‐ Local networks (LN): A group of contiguous transmission Elements operated at or above 100 kV but less than 300 kV that distribute power to Load rather than transfer bulk power across the interconnected system. LN’s emanate from multiple points of connection at 100 kV or higher to improve the level of service toconnection at 100 kV or higher to improve the level of service to retail customer Load and not to accommodate bulk power transfer across the interconnected system.
20 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaExclusions
BES Designation Criteria
E3 ‐ The LN is characterized by all of the following:
a) Limits on connected generation: The LN and its underlying Elements do not include generation resources identified in Inclusion I3 and do not have an aggregate capacity of non‐Inclusion I3 and do not have an aggregate capacity of nonretail generation greater than 75 MVA (gross nameplate rating);
b) P fl l i h LN d h LN d fb) Power flows only into the LN and the LN does not transfer energy originating outside the LN for delivery through the LN; and
21 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaExclusions
BES Designation Criteria
c) Not part of a Flowgate or transfer path: The LN does not contain a monitored Facility of a permanent Flowgate in the y p gEastern Interconnection, a major transfer path within the Western Interconnection, or a comparable monitored Facility in the ERCOT or Quebec Interconnections and is not ain the ERCOT or Quebec Interconnections, and is not a monitored Facility included in an Interconnection Reliability Operating Limit (IROL).
22 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
BES Designation CriteriaExclusions
BES Designation Criteria
E4 – Reactive Power devices owned and operated by the retail customer solely for it’s own use.
23 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Bulk Electric System Definition
Note ‐ Elements may be included or excluded on a case‐by‐case basis through the Rules of Procedure exception processthrough the Rules of Procedure exception process.
24 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of Procedure Exception Process
• What’s Posted (through October 27, 2011): For Comment
o New Rule 509
o New Rule 1703
o New Appendix 5C
For Information P fl dio Process flow diagrams
o Exception Request Form (Sample)
25 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of ProcedureException Process
New Rule 509 ‐ Exceptions to the Definition of the Bulk Electric System
“Appendix 5C sets forth the procedures by which (i) an entity may request a determination that an Element that falls within the definition of the Bulk Electric System should be exemptedthe definition of the Bulk Electric System should be exempted from being considered a part of the Bulk Electric System, or (ii) an entity may request that an Element that falls outside of the d fi iti f th B lk El t i S t h ld b id ddefinition of the Bulk Electric System should be considered a part of the Bulk Electric System.”
26 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of Procedure Exception Process
• New Rule 1703 – Challenges to NERC Determinations f BES E ti R t d ROPof BES Exception Requests under ROP Leverages existing (proposed) appeals process
NERC’s decision to Approve Disapprove or Terminate NERC s decision to Approve, Disapprove, or Terminate
30 days to appeal
90 days for review panel to decidey p
May request BOTCC review panel discussion
27 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of Procedure Exception Process
• New Appendix 5C –d f f Entity determination of status is a prerequisite for
requesting an exception
Section 4: Whos and WhatsSection 4: Whos and Whatso Who can submit and to whom to submit a request
o What to submit
Wh “ ”o Who “approves”
o What happens if I disagree
Section 5: What to expectp
Testo test
28 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of Procedure Exception Process
• Initial Screening“ ” h f b Region “accepts or rejects” the request for substantive
reviewo Eligible submitter?g
o Request for Exception?
o Required information provided?
29 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of Procedure Exception Process
• Substantive Reviewd “ l l” f Region recommends “Approval or Disapproval” of request
to NERC based on:o “…necessary for the Reliable Operation of the interconnected bulk y ppower transmission system as evidenced by Required Information provided.”
30 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of Procedure Exception Process
• NERC Decisionh d h d NERC receives the request record with a recommendation
from the Regional Entityo States the basis for the recommendation
o Includes information considered by the RE in arriving at its recommendation
Submitting Entity or Owner has opportunity to comment in Submitting Entity or Owner has opportunity to comment in support or opposition to the recommendation
NERC decision final if not appealed
31 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Rules of Procedure Exception Process
• Implementation Plans for Requests“ ” h h h h Status “as is” when going through the process
Some implementation may be necessary for: o New Inclusion Exceptionso New Inclusion Exceptions
o Denials of Exception Requests for Exclusion
– Newly‐constructed or installed Element
W i l d d i h BES d h BES D fi i i i ff– Was not included in the BES under the BES Definition in effect
32 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Exception Process Technical Principles
• Comments from first formal posting
• Reliability benefits of an Element cannot be determined by a single study or analysis of a single parameterparameter
• Not feasible to establish continent‐wide values and/or limitslimits
33 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Exception Process Technical Principles
• The SDT has adopted a new approach:“ l d f d ” “Detailed information to Support and Exception Request” Application Form
Targeted questions for Transmission and GenerationTargeted questions for Transmission and Generation addressing the facility characteristics with guidance on the type of supporting evidence to accompany request.
No hard numbers to guide the evaluation.
Engineering judgment will be utilized to perform the evaluation of the evidence in a consistent repeatable andevaluation of the evidence in a consistent, repeatable, and verifiable process.
34 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Initial Ballot Results
• “Detailed Information to Support an Exception R t” A li ti F B ll t R ltRequest” Application Form Ballot Results Quorum: 89.53%
Approval: 64 03% Approval: 64.03%
• Comments from 137 different people from 83 companies representing 10 of the 10 industrycompanies representing 10 of the 10 industry segments
35 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Technical Principles –Clarifying Revisions
• ‘Element’ vs. ‘facility’
• ‘Generation Resource’ vs. ‘generator’
36 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Application Form –General Instructions
• Entities are required to provide:l b k d d f h l d h A one‐line breaker diagram identifying the Elements and the
Protection Systems at the interface points for which the exception is requested.p q
The data and studies needed to support their submittal. Studies should:
1. Be based on an Interconnection‐wide base case
2. Clearly document all assumptions used
3 Address key performance measures of BES reliability3. Address key performance measures of BES reliability through steady‐state power flow and transient stability analysis
37 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Support for your position from other entities (if available).
Application Form -For Transmission Elements
1. Is there generation connected to the Elements?
2 How does the Element(s) impact permanent Flowgates in the2. How does the Element(s) impact permanent Flowgates in the Eastern Interconnection, major transfer paths within the Western Interconnection, or a comparable monitored facility in the ERCOT Interconnection or the Quebec Interconnection?
3. Is the Element(s) included in an IROL in the Eastern Interconnection ERCOT Interconnection or Q ebecInterconnection, ERCOT Interconnection, or Quebec Interconnection or a major transfer path rating in the Western Interconnection?
4. How does an outage of the Element(s) impact the over‐all reliability of the BES?
38 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Application Form -For Transmission Facilities
5. Is the Element(s) used for off‐site power supply to a nuclear power plant as designated in a mutually agreed upon Nuclear Plant Interface Requirement (NPIR)?Plant Interface Requirement (NPIR)?
6. Is the Element(s) part of a Cranking Path identified in a Transmission Operator’s restoration plan? p p
7. Does power flow through this Element(s) into the BES?
39 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Application Form -For Generation Resources
1. What is the MW value of the host Balancing Authority’s most severe single Contingency and what is the generation resource’spercent of this value?
2. Is the generation resource used to provide reliability relatedA ill S i ?Ancillary Services?
3. Is the generator designated as a must run unit for reliability?
4. How does an outage of the generation resource impact the over‐all reliability of the BES?
5 Does the generation resource use the BES to deliver its actual or5. Does the generation resource use the BES to deliver its actual or scheduled output, or a portion of its actual or scheduled output, to Load?
40 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Exception Process Technical Principles
• Industry Concerns:“h d” d “f ” d Desire “hard” and “fast” guidance
Limited role in process
Impact of ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response to questions Impact of yes or no response to questions
What is the benchmark for evaluation
Phase 2 will examine process resultsp
41 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Exception Process Technical Principles
• SDT Responsed d l bl Individual variables, extenuating circumstances
Open and transparent exception process
Professional experience Professional experience
No single answer will determine outcome
Necessary for the reliable operation of the gridy p g
Phase 2 will examine process results
42 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Implementation Plan
• Effective Datesh d f h ll b ff h f d f h This definition shall become effective on the first day of the second calendar quarter after applicable regulatory approval. ‘pp
In those jurisdictions where no regulatory approval is required the definition shall go into effect on the first day of the second calendar quarter after Board of Trusteesthe second calendar quarter after Board of Trustees adoption.
43 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Implementation Plan
• Compliance Obligationsl bl f l l d d b h Compliance obligations for Elements included by the
definition shall begin 24 months after the applicable effective date of the definition.
SDT believes that the timeframe is needed to:
o Effectively produce reasonable transition plans
o Submit any necessary registration changes
o File for exceptions
P id i ioProvide training
44 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Near-term Project Milestones
• Recirculation Ballot (Nov. 14, 2011)d d f h d ( l d Revised BES definition with designations (inclusions and
exclusions)
Implementation PlanImplementation Plan
‘Detailed Information to Support an Exception Request” Application Form
• Post Phase 2 SAR (Dec. 2011)
• File with the Commission (FERC) by January 25, 2012
45 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Question & AnswerQ
Website: http://www nerc com/filez/standards/Project2010 17 BES html
46 RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY
Website: http://www.nerc.com/filez/standards/Project2010-17_BES.html