Upload
lycong
View
222
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Your Biologics and Vaccines CDMO Partner of Choice.
Process Design for an All Single-Use Manufacturing Facility:Scaling Low to High Titer Processes to Fit Standard mAbEquipment
BioProcess International WestMarch 2, 2017
Kelly ThomAssociate Principal ScientistFujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies
One Global Company
3SITES
Billingham, UKCollege Station, TXRTP, North Carolina
1,100EMPLOYEES
World Wide6LICENSES
For commercial manufacturing.
20+YEARS
Of Biologics CDMO experience.
280+MOLECULES
In process development and/or manufacturing.
With you all along the road To clinical success
Regulatory
ApprovalLaunchPhase IIIPhase I Phase IIPreclinical
Gene Expression &Strain / Cell Line
Development
Process Invention
Pre-clinicalManufacture
Process Development& Optimization
Analytical & Stability
cGMP ManufactureFill/Finish
ProcessCharacterization
Process Validation
cGMP Manufacture
Stability
CommercialProduction
Post-approvalActivities
with
55CHO Programs
Our Cell Culture Experience
65+Cell Culture Programs, including CHO
and Baculovirus
10Baculovirus Programs
1Commercially Approved
Cell Culture Product Manufactured at FDB
FDB Single-Use Bioprocessing Journey
• Learning from Early Adoption of Single-Use Technologies
• Process Design Goals for New Facility
• Facility Layout, Room Classifications, and Closure Strategy
• Upstream and Downstream Single-Use Processes and Equipment
• Modeling to Design Small (2 g/L), Medium (5 g/L), and Large (8 g/L) Downstream Process
Creating biomanufacturing capacityA global partnership
1000 L project
1000 L project
2000 L project
• Single-use WAVE Bioreactor™ systems
• Xcellerex™ XDR cell culture suite
• ÄKTA™ready and ReadyToProcess™
prepacked columns
2013
2012
2014
2015
Billingham, UK
Driven by the industry need for
cGMP mammalian cell culture
biomanufacturing capacity
Four successful capacity expansion
projects on two continents
Creating the UK’s first fully single-use
biomanufacturing facility
2017 20182019
• Xcellerex single-use mixers
• Xcellerex XDR cell culture suite
• ÄKTA™ready purification system
• Xcellerex XDR 2000L
bioreactor added
Research Triangle Park, US
Research Triangle Park, US
2000 L project
• Xcellerex XDR 2000L
bioreactor added
Billingham, UK
Ongoing partnership
Development of FDB Single Use Bioreactor Platform
• Why Single Use?– Capacity can be increased quickly– Capital investment and payback time are less– Footprints are reduced– Less utilities are required (CIP/SIP)– No cleaning verification/validation– Less cost for room classifications, EM monitoring, personnel gowning/flow– Multi-product manufacture (“ballroom”) suites– Multiple products in multiple suites (reduced changeover times)
• Production Bioreactor Selection– Process performance (mixing, mass transfer, sparger flexibility)– Engineering design (hardware and bag design)– Control system capability and automation tie-in– Equipment cost and product support– Speed and ease of implementation and qualification– Track record
200L SUB
1000L SUB
110L SS
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
VC
D (
10
5c
ell
s/m
L)
Time (days)
110LSS Avg (n=3) 200LSUB Avg (n=3) 1000L SUB Avg (n=2)
Stainless Steel vs. Single Use Bioreactor
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20P
rod
uc
t (g
/L)
Time (days)
110LSS Avg (n=3) 200L SUB Avg (n=3) 1000LSUB Avg (n=2)
Product Quality: Glycosylation Patterns
SUB Scale Up by Mass Transfer
• O2 kLa characterization performed for all SUBs– 10, 50, 200, 500, 1000 and 2000 L
• kLa models are being developed in MODDE
• CO2 stripping characterization is on the horizon
± 20%
0 – 50%
Dis
so
lve
d O
xyg
en
(%
) O2
Sp
arg
e(s
Lp
m)
Culture Duration (14 days)
1000 L CHO Process (~30 E6 cells/mL)
To achieve peak kLa = 7 hr-1
100 rpm = 50% sparge120 rpm = 38% sparge
SUB Scale Up to 1000 L GMP
Upstream Learning from Early Adoption
• Hardware Design– MFC sizing
– Automated exhaust filter strategy
• SUB Bag Design– Enough addition lines with correct
diameters
– Tubing is long enough for all connections
– Multiple exhaust filters
– Evaluate the bag film
• Connectivity– Minimize the number of sterile
connections
– Welding vs. sterile connectors
– Solution bags with on-board filters and tubing to match the SUB
• Raw Materials– Liquid media
– Pre-made solutions (nutrient feeds if stability allows, glucose, glutamine, antifoam)
– Have capability to formulate if needed
Development of FDB Single Use Downstream Platform
• Manufacturing experience with multiple single-use vendors and equipment
Chrom Skids Pre-packed Columns Single Use TFF Skids Single Use Mixers
GE AKTAReady GE ReadytoProcess Pall SU TFF GE XDM / XDUO
Repligen Opus Sartorius FlexAct Sartorius Palletank
Millipore Mobius
Downstream Learning from Early Adoption
• Design Limitations– Skids: flow rates, mixing, temperature control, hydroxide exposure,
flow kit max usage time (limited tubing lifetime in peristaltic pump)
– mAb throughputs: low chrom skid flow rates, low TFF membrane throughput
• Instrumentation Limitations– Sensor (P, T, UV, flow, conductivity) issues
– Use of traditional pH probe instead of inline pH probe
• Installation Limitations– Operators must standardize sensors as part of self check
– Manifold installation is cumbersome
– Lack of manifold labeling can result in cross connectivity issues
– Standard manifold tubing sizes may require different connectors (connecting 1” to ½” tubing)
• Tubing management and consumable design were key early learnings
• Need to manage customization against cost
Process Design Goals for HT, mAb Facility
• Standardized offering • All single-use equipment • Medium/high density fed batch CHO (10 – 40 E6 cells/mL)• Downstream to process a wide range of upstream titers
– Small (2 g/L), Medium (5 g/L) and Large (8 g/L) Downstream Scenarios
• One set of standard equipment with scaling flexibility• Define closed processing needs and connectivity strategy• Placement of unit operations for optimal suite scheduling and process flow• Allowable process duration for each unit operation• Off-the-shelf products wherever possible • BOMs for small, medium, and large downstream• Raw material and consumable costs for a batch
Design Approaches
• GE Flex Factory equipment and automation (USP, partial DSP)
• Super Pro Modeling: Created a simulation to scale the FDB platform process over a range of 2 – 8 g/L
Model Inputs Model Outputs
2000 L Harvest Titer Unit Op and Total Batch Duration
Filter Fluxes Column Sizes
Resin Capacities Number of Column Cycles
Step Yields Filter/Membrane Areas
Buffer and Process Volumes
SUM Sizes
Raw Material Cost per Gram
Unit Operations by Suite
• Harvest one batch per week• At steady state, up to nine products in flight
Single-Use Upstream PFD
Single-Use Downstream PFD
Super Pro Model
Protein A ViralInactivation
CEX
AEX Nanofiltration TFF Bulk Fill
Chromatography Estimates and SUM Sizing
Protein A CEX
Protein Titer Column Size CyclesProcess
DurationColumn Size Cycles
Process Duration
(g/L) (L) (#) (hr) (L) (#) (hr)Small 2 - 3 10 8 - 12 48 - 62 10 6 - 9 20 - 30Medium 3 - 5 20 6 - 10 31 - 45 20 4 - 7 14 - 24Large 5 - 8 32 7 -10 31 - 41 32 5 - 7 17 - 24
Clarified Harvest
VI SUM 1 VI SUM 2 CEX Eluate AEX Eluate Nanofiltrate
Protein Titer SUM A SUM B SUM C SUM D SUM E SUM F
(g/L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L) (L)Small 2 - 3 2500 200 200 1000 1000 1000Medium 3 - 5 2500 500 500 1000 1000 1000Large 5 - 8 2500 1000 1000 2500 2500 1000
NOTE: SUM sizes were determined from process volumes, which are not shown.
Raw Materials Cost per Gram
TFF Design
Protein Titer (g/L)
DS Conc. 2 3 5 8
(mg/mL) TFF Retentate / Final DS Volume (L)
1
10 236 354 590 944
50 47 71 118 189
100 24 35 59 94
180 20 33 52
• Assumption that DF will occur at 10 – 50 mg/mL retentate concentration• 50 L and 200 L retentate tanks will be used• 1000 L SUM used for retentate volume > 200 L
Summary
• FDB leveraged learnings from early adoption of single-use technologies to guide process/facility design
• The new facility utilizes the multi-product ballroom approach– Harvest of one batch per week
– Up to nine products in flight at steady state
• Super Pro modeling was used to define small, medium and large downstream processes– Equipment
– Processes
– Durations
– Cost
Acknowledgements
Upstream Development
• Sharyn Farnsworth
• Simon Uphill
Downstream Development
• Patrick Daley
• Mark Chavez
• Jonathan Haigh
• Michael Murray
• Phil Ropp
• Kevin Short
• Matt Teten
Process/Facility Design
• Mike Jones
• Peter Large
• Stewart McNaull
• Thomas Page
• Mary Vo-Harris
• GE Flex Factory Design Team
FUJIFILM Diosynth BiotechnologiesAdvancing Tomorrow’s Medicines
TO LEARN MORE VISIT US AT
BOOTH 908