Principles of Mapping Scale for Landslide

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 Principles of Mapping Scale for Landslide

    1/3

    MAPPING SCALE[APPLICABILTY OF MAPS]

    GEO-INFO FOR SPATIAL PLANNING AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT Page 1By: Rini Meiarti (Pompon Watershed Team) [email protected]

    PRINCIPLE OF MAPPING SCALE PARTICULARLY FOR LANDSLIDE

    INTRODUCTION:

    Determining of base map particularly for landslide susceptibility, hazard,

    vulnerability, and risk assessment; morpho conservation; and geology

    geomorphology depends on scale of analysis. Scale of analysis on the output of

    mapping scale. Furthermore, mapping scale emphasizes area of research location

    (m2).

    1. Determining the smallest polygon area by Sutanto, 1996:

    The formula could be defined by as follow below:

    Table 1shows the smallest polygon area in each mapping scale.

    Table 1. Principle of determining smallest polygon

    area in each mapping scale

    No ScaleSmallest polygon area

    ha m2

    1 1:5,000 0.125 1,250

    2 1:10,000 0.25 2,500

    3 1:15,000 0.375 3,750

    4 1:25,000 0.625 6,250

    5 1:50,000 1.25 12,500

    6 1:100,000 2.5 25,000

    7 1:150,000 3.75 37,500

    8 1:200,000 5 50,000

    9 1:250,000 6.25 62,500Source: Principle of Remote Sensing by Sutanto year 1996,

    modified

    Table 2shows the range area between levels mapping scale.

    Table 2. Applicability of mapping scale principle related

    methods of landslide

    No Scale class ScaleRange of smallest

    polygon area (m2)

    1 Large > 1:10,000 > 2,500

    2 Medium 25,000 - 50,000 6,250 - 12,500

    3 Regional > 1:100,000 > 25,000

    Source: Multi - hazards risk assessment by van Westen year 2011, modified

    0,5 x 0,5 x denominator of mapping scale

  • 7/24/2019 Principles of Mapping Scale for Landslide

    2/3

    MAPPING SCALE[APPLICABILTY OF MAPS]

    GEO-INFO FOR SPATIAL PLANNING AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT Page 2By: Rini Meiarti (Pompon Watershed Team) [email protected]

    2. Correspondence of Mapping Scale by Tobler, 1959:

    Map Scale = Spatial Resolution (in meter) * 2 * 1,000

    = 1 x 2 x 1,000

    = 2,000 or 1:2,000

    Table 3shows the establishment of relation between spatial resolution and

    mapping scale.

    Table 3. Correspondence between mapping scale and spatial resolution

    No Mappingscale

    Inmeter

    Spatial

    resolution/Pixel value(m)

    Related satellite imagery

    Type P/M

    1 1:1,000 1 0.5 QuickBird P = 0.6

    Worldview-1 P = 0.5

    GeoEye-1 P = 0.4

    2 1:2,000 2 1 Ikonos P = 1

    GeoEye M = 1.65

    Worldview-2 M = 1.8

    3 1:5,000 5 2.5 QuickBird M = 2.4 and 2.8

    SPOT-5 P = 2.5 - 5

    Formosat-2 P = 2

    ALOS P = 2.5

    4 1:10,000 10 5 SPOT-5 P = 2.5 - 5

    Ikonos M = 4

    Aerial

    Photograph

    (result of UAV) P = 25

    5 1:15,000 15 7.5 Formosat-2 M = 8

    6 1:25,000 25 12.5 SPOT-5 M = 10

    Landsat TM P = 15

    ALOS M = 10

    ASTER VNIR = 15

    7 1:50,000 50 25 Landsat TM M = 30

    Aster SVVIR = 30

    8 1:100,000 100 50 Landsat TM M = 30

    Source: Automation and Cartography by W. R. Tobler year 1959

    REFERENCES:

    Sutanto. 1996. Penginderaan Jauh Dasar. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University

    Press.

  • 7/24/2019 Principles of Mapping Scale for Landslide

    3/3

    MAPPING SCALE[APPLICABILTY OF MAPS]

    GEO-INFO FOR SPATIAL PLANNING AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT Page 3By: Rini Meiarti (Pompon Watershed Team) [email protected]

    Tobler, W. R. 1959. Automation and Cartography. California: Pamphlet.

    van Westen, C. J., D. Alkema, M. C. J. Damen, N. Kerle, and N. C. Kingma.2011. Guide book: Multi hazards risk assessment. Enschede Netherland:

    ITC. p: 71 72.