Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
P R E VA L E N C ES U R V E Y
2018
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
DATA AND INFORMATION RESEARCH CENTERDATA AND INFORMATION RESEARCH CENTERDATA AND INFORMATION RESEARCH CENTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS BOARDNATIONAL NARCOTICS BOARDNATIONAL NARCOTICS BOARD
2019
P R E VA L E N C ES U R V E Y
2 0 1 8
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNN
ISBN : 978-602-74498-6-2
Prevalence Survey 2018Copyright @2019
Editorial Board :Supervisor : Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.Si, M.H.Advisor : Dr. Sri Sunarti Purwaningsih, M.A Drs. Masyhuri Imron, M.AChief Editor : Dra. Endang Mulyani, M.SiSecretary : Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP., S.H., M.SiTeam Members : Dwi Sulistyorini, S.Si., M.Si Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H Erma Antasari, S.Si Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi Armita Eki Indahsari, S.Si Radityo Kunto Harimurti, S. StatCover & Content Design : Indoyanu Muhamad
All rights reserved.It is prohibited to quote or reproduce part or all of the contents of this book without written permission from the Publisher.
Publisher :Pusat Penelitian Data dan Informasi (Data and Information Research Center)Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia (National Narcotics Board of the Republic of Indonesia)Jl. MT. Haryono No. 11 Cawang, East JakartaTelp.(021) 80871566, 80871567Fax. (021) 80885225, 80871591, 80871593Email : [email protected] Center : 184SMS Center : 081221675675Email : [email protected] : www.bnn.go.id
Perpus
takaa
n Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si
Perpus
takaa
n Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md
Perpus
takaa
n Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom
Perpus
takaa
n Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi
Perpus
takaa
n Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi Armita Eki Indahsari, S.Si
Perpus
takaa
n Armita Eki Indahsari, S.Si Radityo Kunto Harimurti, S. Stat
Perpus
takaa
n
Radityo Kunto Harimurti, S. StatCover & Content Design : Indoyanu Muhamad
Perpus
takaa
n
Cover & Content Design : Indoyanu Muhamad
It is prohibited to quote or reproduce part or all of the contents of this book
Perpus
takaa
n
It is prohibited to quote or reproduce part or all of the contents of this book without written permission from the Publisher.Perp
ustak
aan
without written permission from the Publisher.
BNN Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si
BNN Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H
BNN Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H Erma Antasari, S.Si
BNN Erma Antasari, S.Si Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.SiBNN Sri Haryanti, S.Sos., M.Si
i
Assalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh. May peace be upon us.
Let us praise to God the Almighty for the blessing that BNN in cooperation with the Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI has completed the Book of Prevalence Survey 2018. The survey is conducted in three groups namely the group of students/university students, workers, and household.
abuse (ever use and current user) students/university students and workers
drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to identify the rate of household vulnerability toward the danger of drugs. With this the survey, it is expected that the society and stakeholders will aware of the issues on drug abuse in Indonesia and its development year by year.
Finally, as Chief of BNN, we would like to convey our gratitude to Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) as the supervisor of research functions and to all parties involving in the formulation of this Book that enable us to publish it ontime. We hope that the results of this research can be used widely to support the policy of prevention and eradication of drug
this would be a reference for all ministries or institutions as well as society to
Thank you Wassalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh. Jakarta, October 2019 Chief of National Narcotics Board
Drs. Heru Winarko, S.H
Foreword
iPrevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to
Perpus
takaa
n drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to identify the rate of household vulnerability toward the danger of drugs. With
Perpus
takaa
n identify the rate of household vulnerability toward the danger of drugs. With this the survey, it is expected that the society and stakeholders will aware of
Perpus
takaa
n this the survey, it is expected that the society and stakeholders will aware of the issues on drug abuse in Indonesia and its development year by year.
Perpus
takaa
n the issues on drug abuse in Indonesia and its development year by year.
Finally, as Chief of BNN, we would like to convey our gratitude to
Perpus
takaa
n
Finally, as Chief of BNN, we would like to convey our gratitude to Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) as the supervisor of research
Perpus
takaa
n
Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) as the supervisor of research functions and to all parties involving in the formulation of this Book that
Perpus
takaa
n
functions and to all parties involving in the formulation of this Book that enable us to publish it ontime. We hope that the results of this research can
Perpus
takaa
n
enable us to publish it ontime. We hope that the results of this research can be used widely to support the policy of prevention and eradication of drug Perp
ustak
aan
be used widely to support the policy of prevention and eradication of drug Perpus
takaa
n
this would be a reference for all ministries or institutions as well as society to Perp
ustak
aan
this would be a reference for all ministries or institutions as well as society to
BNNBNNabuse (ever use and current user) students/university students and workers
BNNabuse (ever use and current user) students/university students and workers
BNNBNN
drugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to BNNdrugs, and P4GN program intervention. Furthermore, this research aims to
ii
Praise be to God the Almighty for his grace and guidance to us for completing the Book of Prevalence Survey 2018 on time. This research is a collaboration between Badan Narkotika Nasional (National Narcotics Board/BNN) and Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI. This research was assisted by University Researchers in 13 Provinces in Indonesia.
among students and university students, drug abuse prevalence among workers, and vulnerability rate of household toward the danger of drugs.
This survey involves many parties including expert team of BNN,
informan, enumerator, and university local partner in 13 Provinces. In this opportunity, we would like to convey our gratitude to Chief of BNN Drs. Heru Winarko S.H and Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H as Primary Secretary of BNN for the instruction. We would like to deliver our gratitude as well to Head of Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani, M.Si, Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si, Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si, Erma Antasari, S.Si, Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si, Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H, Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md and all BNN staffs for the assistance and cooperation in each stage of this study, from instrument development to report writing.
Furthermore, we would like deliver our gratitude to Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI and all local universities partner namely: University of Syiah Kuala Aceh, University of Sumatera Utara, University of Sriwijaya Palembang, University of Nasional Jakarta, University of Padjajaran Bandung, University of Gajah Mada Yogyakarta, University of Airlangga Surabaya, University of Riau Kepulauan Batam, University of Udayana Bali, University of Mulawarman Samarinda, Politeknik Kesehatan (Polytechnic of Health) Pontianak, University of Hasanuddin Makassar, University of Cendrawasih Papua.
contribution on decision making and improvement on Prevention and
Jakarta, October 2019
Editorial Board
Preface
ii Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani,
Perpus
takaa
n Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani, M.Si, Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si, Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si, Erma
Perpus
takaa
n M.Si, Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si, Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si, Erma Antasari, S.Si, Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si, Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H, Quazar
Perpus
takaa
n Antasari, S.Si, Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si, Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H, Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md and all BNN staffs for the assistance and cooperation
Perpus
takaa
n Noor Azhim, A.Md and all BNN staffs for the assistance and cooperation in each stage of this study, from instrument development to report writing.
Perpus
takaa
n in each stage of this study, from instrument development to report writing.
Furthermore, we would like deliver our gratitude to Culture and
Perpus
takaa
n
Furthermore, we would like deliver our gratitude to Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI and all local universities partner namely:
Perpus
takaa
n
Society Research Center of LIPI and all local universities partner namely: University of Syiah Kuala Aceh, University of Sumatera Utara, University
Perpus
takaa
n
University of Syiah Kuala Aceh, University of Sumatera Utara, University of Sriwijaya Palembang, University of Nasional Jakarta, University of
Perpus
takaa
n
of Sriwijaya Palembang, University of Nasional Jakarta, University of Padjajaran Bandung, University of Gajah Mada Yogyakarta, University of Perp
ustak
aan
Padjajaran Bandung, University of Gajah Mada Yogyakarta, University of Airlangga Surabaya, University of Riau Kepulauan Batam, University of Perp
ustak
aan
Airlangga Surabaya, University of Riau Kepulauan Batam, University of
BNNopportunity, we would like to convey our gratitude to Chief of BNN Drs.
BNNopportunity, we would like to convey our gratitude to Chief of BNN Drs. Heru Winarko S.H and Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H as Primary Secretary of BNN
BNNHeru Winarko S.H and Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H as Primary Secretary of BNN for the instruction. We would like to deliver our gratitude as well to Head of BNNfor the instruction. We would like to deliver our gratitude as well to Head of Research Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani, BNNResearch Center, Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.H., M.Si, Dra. Endang Mulyani,
iii
Prologue
iii
Currently, Indonesia has stated that the state is in drug emergency situation as drug abuse has spread to all layers of the society across the country. According to research by BNN in collaboration with Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia in 2017, the prevalence rate of drug abusers was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,115 of Indonesian population and the social-economic loss due to drug abuse was Rp 84.7 trillion.
Data on prevalence rate of drug abuse is obtained through a survey. In 2004-2017, BNN in cooperation with Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia conducted a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse in three groups of the community, namely students and university stduents, workers, and households. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three groups of the community, namely students and university stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.
and LIPI in 2018. New facts revealed by this research such as prevalence rate of drug abuse (ever use and current user) among students and university students, and workers as well as related factors such as the
on drugs, and the P4GN program intervention. In addition, the survey on
toward the danger of drugs. With the result of this research, it is expected that the policy in prevention and eradication of drug abuse and its illegal
Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in
Perpus
takaa
n stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands,
Perpus
takaa
n 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West
Perpus
takaa
n Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.
Perpus
takaa
n Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.
Perpus
takaa
n
and LIPI in 2018. New facts revealed by this research such as prevalence
Perpus
takaa
n
and LIPI in 2018. New facts revealed by this research such as prevalence rate of drug abuse (ever use and current user) among students and
Perpus
takaa
n
rate of drug abuse (ever use and current user) among students and university students, and workers as well as related factors such as the
Perpus
takaa
n
university students, and workers as well as related factors such as the
Perpus
takaa
n
on drugs, and the P4GN program intervention. In addition, the survey on Perpus
takaa
n
on drugs, and the P4GN program intervention. In addition, the survey on
BNNuniversity stduents, workers, and households. In 2018, BNN in cooperation
BNNuniversity stduents, workers, and households. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to
BNNwith Culture and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried
BNNcalculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three groups of the community, namely students and university BNNout in three groups of the community, namely students and university stduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in BNNstduents, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in
iviv
FOREWORDPREFACEPROLOGUE TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF TABLE LIST OF GRAPHIC
PENDAHULUAN1.1. Background 1.2. Issues 1.3. Objective and Target1.4. Conceptual Framework
1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and Its Impact 1.4.3. Workers and Drugs 1.4.4 Students and Drugs1.4.5 Household and Drugs
1.5. Research Methodology 1.5.1. Research Location 1.5.2. Data Collection Technique 1.5.3. Data Analysis 1.5.4. Research Instrument
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY STUDENTS2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic
2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education 2.1.2. Current Place of Residence 2.1.3. Monthly Pocket Money 2.1.4. Parents’ Condition
2.2. Knowledge on Drugs2.2.1. Knowledge on Types of Drugs 2.2.2. Distribution of Respondents According to Level of Education and Knowledge on Types of Drugs 2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types of Drugs and Province 2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018
iiiiv
vix
xii
135677
101516171818182021
2325252727282929
31
32
32
Table Contents
Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n 1.5.2. Data Collection Technique
Perpus
takaa
n 1.5.2. Data Collection Technique 1.5.3. Data Analysis
Perpus
takaa
n
1.5.3. Data Analysis 1.5.4. Research Instrument
Perpus
takaa
n
1.5.4. Research Instrument
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY
Perpus
takaa
n
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY
2.1. Respondents’ CharacteristicPerpus
takaa
n
2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education
Perpus
takaa
n
2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education
BNN
v
Table Contents
v
2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students and University Students
2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students 2.2.7. Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues due to Drug Abuse 2.2.8 Attitude toward Drug Abuse
2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University Students 2.3.2 Prevalence Rate per Province 2.3.3. Risky Behavior Toward Drug Abuse 2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease) 2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently and Years Before)
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS 3.1. Characteristics of Respondents among Workers 3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs among Workers
3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs among Workers 3.2.2. Attitude toward Drug Abuse
3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province 3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers 3.3.4. Source to Obtain Drugs among Workers
FAMILY VULNERABILITY IN FACING THE DANGER OF DRUG ABUSE
4.1.1. Characteristics of Household Demography 4.1.2 Gender of Household Members 4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age 4.1.4. Marital Status of Household Members4.1.5. Residence Status of Household Members
33
34
353636
36404243
43
4547
4848505151555859
61636364
656667
Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n Currently and Years Before)
Perpus
takaa
n Currently and Years Before)
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS
Perpus
takaa
n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS 3.1. Characteristics of Respondents among Workers
Perpus
takaa
n 3.1. Characteristics of Respondents among Workers 3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs among
Perpus
takaa
n 3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs among
3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs among Workers
Perpus
takaa
n
3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs among Workers 3.2.2. Attitude toward Drug Abuse
Perpus
takaa
n
3.2.2. Attitude toward Drug Abuse
Perpus
takaa
n
3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers Perpus
takaa
n
3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province Perp
ustak
aan
3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province 3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers
Perpus
takaa
n
3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers
BNN2.3.3. Risky Behavior Toward Drug Abuse
BNN2.3.3. Risky Behavior Toward Drug Abuse 2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease)
BNN2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease) 2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs BNN2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs
vi
Table Contents
vi
4.2. Social Condition 4.2.1. Education 4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household 4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation 4.2.4. Household’s Average Income and Spending
4.3. Sensitivity of Household toward the Danger of Drugs 4.3.1. Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs 4.3.2. Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use 4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and Occupation 4.3.4. View and Attitude on Drugs Abuse
4.4. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs 4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members 4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs
4.5 Household’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs
P4GN (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING) PROGRAM INTERVENVENTION5.1. P4GN Program Implementation5.2. P4GN Program Among Workers
CLOSING6.1. Summary 6.2. Recommendation
6.2.1 Prevention 6.2.2 Community Empowerment 6.2.3 Rehabilitation
LIST OF ABBREVIATION & LIST OF RESEARCHERS List of AbbreviationList of BNN and LIPI Researchers
APPENDICESAppendix 1 Distribution of Respondents According to Types of Drugs And Province, 2018 (%) Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues Due to Drug Abuse (%)
676768
6970717171737475757677
798182
858788888989
919396
97
99
99
Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n P4GN (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND
Perpus
takaa
n P4GN (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING) PROGRAM INTERVENVENTION
Perpus
takaa
n ILLICIT TRAFICKING) PROGRAM INTERVENVENTION5.1. P4GN Program Implementation
Perpus
takaa
n 5.1. P4GN Program Implementation5.2. P4GN Program Among Workers
Perpus
takaa
n 5.2. P4GN Program Among Workers
6.2. Recommendation
Perpus
takaa
n
6.2. Recommendation 6.2.1 Prevention Perp
ustak
aan
6.2.1 Prevention 6.2.2 Community Empowerment Perp
ustak
aan
6.2.2 Community Empowerment
BNN4.4. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs
BNN4.4. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs
4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members
BNN4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members 4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs
BNN4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs Household’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs BNNHousehold’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs
vii
Table Contents
vii
Appendix 3 Distribution of Perception on the Attitude Toward Drug Abuse According to The Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%)Appendix 4 Respondents’ Knowledge on Social Impact From Drug Abuse Appendix 5 Perception on Attitude toward Drug Abuse According to the Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%) Appendix 6 Types of Consumed Drugs and the Age when Using Drugs for the First Time, 2018
EPILOG UE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
100
101
102
103
104
105
Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
viiiviii
Table 1 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017Table2 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017Table 3 Respondent’s Knowledge on Types of Drugs, 2018Table 4 Distribution of Respondents based on the Level of Education and Knowledge on Types of Drugs (%)Table 5 Distribution of Respondents Based on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018 (%)Table 6 Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students, 2018 (%)Table 7 Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User Among Students and University Students According to the Level of Education (%)Table 8 Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students According to the Level of Education and GenderTable 9 Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of UsageTable 10 Reasons of Using DrugsTabel 11 Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past YearTable 12 Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level of Education Per Capital City of ProvinceTable 13 Prevalence Rate of Past Year According to the Status of Usage in 13 Capital Cities of the ProvinceTable 14 Distribution of Respondents According to Profession SectorTable 15 Respondents’ Knowledge on Types of Drugs
Table 17 Respondents’ Attitude When Friends or Family Members Use DrugsTable 18 Prevalence of Ever Use and Current User Table 19 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to GenderTable 20 Prevalence Rate of Current User According to the Status of Usage
15
1630
32
33
35
37
37
383940
41
42
474950
515152
53
List of Table
Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n Among Students and University Students According
Perpus
takaa
n Among Students and University Students According to the Level of Education (%)
Perpus
takaa
n to the Level of Education (%)Table 8 Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students
Perpus
takaa
n Table 8 Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students According to the Level of
Perpus
takaa
n and University Students According to the Level of Education and Gender
Perpus
takaa
n Education and GenderTable 9 Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of
Perpus
takaa
n
Table 9 Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of
Table 10 Reasons of Using Drugs
Perpus
takaa
n
Table 10 Reasons of Using DrugsTabel 11 Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past Year
Perpus
takaa
n
Tabel 11 Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past YearTable 12 Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level Perp
ustak
aan
Table 12 Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level of Education Per Capital City of ProvincePerp
ustak
aan
of Education Per Capital City of Province
BNNTable 6 Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug
BNNTable 6 Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students,
BNN Abuse Among Students and University Students,
Table 7 Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User BNNTable 7 Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User Among Students and University Students According BNN Among Students and University Students According
ix
List of Table
ix
Table 21 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Work
Table 22 Respondent’s Reason of Using Drugs for the First Time Table 23 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Province and Gender Table 24 Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Province and Status of UsageTable 25 Number of Smoker, Electric Smoker, and Alcoholics Among Workers in the Past Year According to GenderTable 26 The Age of Smoking, Smoking Electric Cigarette, and Drinking Alcohol for the First TimeTable 27 Ways to Obtain Drugs (N= 248)Table 28 The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According to Types of Drugs (N = 248)Table 29 Household Income and SpendingTable 30 Environment Exposure from the Danger of DrugsTable 31 Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use
Table 33 Implementing Agency of P4GN Program According to Drug Users and Non-Drug User WorkersTable 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention According to Workers
54
55
56
57
58
5859
6070717274
83
84
Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n Table 29 Household Income and Spending
Perpus
takaa
n Table 29 Household Income and SpendingTable 30 Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs
Perpus
takaa
n Table 30 Environment Exposure from the Danger of DrugsTable 31 Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use
Perpus
takaa
n Table 31 Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use
Perpus
takaa
n Table 33 Implementing Agency of P4GN Program According
Perpus
takaa
n Table 33 Implementing Agency of P4GN Program According to Drug Users and Non-Drug User Workers
Perpus
takaa
n
to Drug Users and Non-Drug User WorkersTable 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention
Perpus
takaa
n
Table 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention According to Workers
Perpus
takaa
n
According to Workers
BNNTable 28 The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According
BNNTable 28 The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According
Table 29 Household Income and SpendingBNNTable 29 Household Income and Spending
x
Daftar Isi List of Graphic
x
Graphic 1 Respondents’ Gender Graphic 2 Respondents’ Level of Education Graphic 3 Current Respondents’ Place of Residence Graphic 4 Respondents’ Monthly Pocket Money Graphic 5 Respondents’ Parents Condition Graphic 6 Knowledge on Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students, 2018 Graphic 7 Comparison of Prevalence Rate Among Students and University Students According to Gender Graphic 8 Graphic of Prevalence Rate Comparison Among Drug User Students and University Students in the Past Year According to GenderGraphic 9 Number of Household MembersGraphic 10 Gender of Household MembersGraphic 11 Household Members by GenderGraphic 12 Marital Status of Household MembersGraphic 13 Residence StatusGraphic 14 Level of Education of Household MembersGraphic 15 Social Status of Head of Household Graphic 16 Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past MonthGraphic 17 Household Members with Smoking Habit Graphic 18 Household Members with Attitude toward Drugs AbuseGraphic 19 Types of Drugs Consumed by Household MembersGraphic 20 Household Members Who Have an Issue with Law
Have Been Sentenced Due to Drugs Graphic 21 Distribution of Household Which Knows the Household Members’ Close Friend Graphic 22 P4GN Program Implementing Agency According to Student Respondents
2828293030
36
46
47686970717172
7374808182
83
84
88
Perpus
takaa
n Graphic 12 Marital Status of Household Members
Perpus
takaa
n Graphic 12 Marital Status of Household Members
Graphic 14 Level of Education of Household Members
Perpus
takaa
n Graphic 14 Level of Education of Household MembersGraphic 15 Social Status of Head of Household
Perpus
takaa
n Graphic 15 Social Status of Head of Household
Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month
Perpus
takaa
n Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month
Graphic 17 Household Members with Smoking Habit
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 17 Household Members with Smoking Habit Graphic 18 Household Members with Attitude toward Drugs
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 18 Household Members with Attitude toward Drugs Abuse
Perpus
takaa
n
AbuseGraphic 19 Types of Drugs Consumed by
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 19 Types of Drugs Consumed by Graphic 20 Household Members Who Have an Issue with Law Perp
ustak
aan
Graphic 20 Household Members Who Have an Issue with Law Perpus
takaa
n BNN
Graphic 11 Household Members by Gender BNNGraphic 11 Household Members by GenderGraphic 12 Marital Status of Household MembersBNNGraphic 12 Marital Status of Household Members
INTRODUCTION
I
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n INTRODUCTION
Perpus
takaa
n INTRODUCTIONBNNINTRODUCTIONBNNINTRODUCTION
2
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
3Prevalence Survey 2018
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
The vast ocean in Indonesia Unitary State which is larger than the maindland has encouraged drugs syndicate to smuggle drugs to Indonesia. In 2018, BNN seized 3.6 ton meth, 7.3 tons marijuana, 531 thousand ecstasies, 68 kilos cathinone, and 28,000 PCC/ Carisoprodol pills.1 Indonesia has become a target of drugs smuggling from international syndicate. Indonesia’s large population and high economic growth have been an attraction for drugs syndicate.
Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia (UI) in 2017, the prevalence trend of drug abuse was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,114 drug abusers. This number consists of several categories, namely 1,909,319 of experimental abusers, 920,100 of regular users, 489,197 non-injected drug addicts, and 58,498 injected drug addicts. The total of drug abusers was 3,376,115 people.
Until 2018, 74 types of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) have been in circulation in Indonesia in which 66 of them have been regulated to the Ministry of Health Regulation. In BNN survey in 2017, several types
I
1 Research, Data, and Information Center of BNN, Research Findings of BNN & PPK UI, 2016
Perpus
takaa
n The vast ocean in Indonesia Unitary State which is larger than
Perpus
takaa
n The vast ocean in Indonesia Unitary State which is larger than the maindland has encouraged drugs syndicate to smuggle drugs to
Perpus
takaa
n the maindland has encouraged drugs syndicate to smuggle drugs to Indonesia. In 2018, BNN seized 3.6 ton meth, 7.3 tons marijuana, 531
Perpus
takaa
n Indonesia. In 2018, BNN seized 3.6 ton meth, 7.3 tons marijuana, 531 thousand ecstasies, 68 kilos cathinone, and 28,000 PCC/ Carisoprodol
Perpus
takaa
n thousand ecstasies, 68 kilos cathinone, and 28,000 PCC/ Carisoprodol pills.1 Indonesia has become a target of drugs smuggling from
Perpus
takaa
n
pills.1 Indonesia has become a target of drugs smuggling from international syndicate. Indonesia’s large population and high economic
Perpus
takaa
n
international syndicate. Indonesia’s large population and high economic growth have been an attraction for drugs syndicate.
Perpus
takaa
n
growth have been an attraction for drugs syndicate.
Perpus
takaa
n
Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia (UI) in 2017, the Perpus
takaa
n
Health Research Center of the University of Indonesia (UI) in 2017, the prevalence trend of drug abuse was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,114 drug
Perpus
takaa
n
prevalence trend of drug abuse was 1.77% or equal to 3,376,114 drug
BNN
4 Prevalence Survey 2018
and PCC pill which have become a serious threat to the community, especially a case in Kendari in September 2017.2
The data of drug seize through the years indicates that drug
revealed 46,537 cases across Indonesia as well as arrested 58,365 suspects, 34 suspects of money laundering, and 79 suspects who
were then known as drugs dealer and syndicate in Indonesia. The
ecstasy pills, and 627.84 kilogram of liquid ecstasy. In addition, BNN
vehicles, property, land, jewelry, cash money, and money in the account amounting to Rp 105 billion.3
2008 to 2011 of about 0.24% or equal to 911,805 abusers. Meanwhile, prevalence rate of drug abuse from 2011 to 2014 decreased about 0.05% or equal to 251.555 abusers. However, until 2017, the prevalence rate decreased 0.14% per year. The declining prevalence rate can be seen also in 2017 survey which shows that the prevalence rate among workers decreased from 12.8% in 2012 into 9.1% in 2017 (Health Research Center and BNN, 2017).
The declining prevalence rate of drug abuse is one of the indicators of the government success cq Ministry/Institution in reducing the prevalence rate of drug abuse in P4GN. In implementing P4GN, the operational pillars of BNN have formulated a number of strategies in the
Prevention, Community Empowerment, Eradication, and Rehabilitation.
Strategies and program are needed in eradicating drugs abuse as the implementation of P4GN. In order that the strategies and program meet the target, a survey on drug abuse is conducted. Related to
2 Research, Data, and Information Center of BNN, Survey Findings on Drug Abuse in 34 Provinces, 20173 https://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/fullhttps://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/full
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 2008 to 2011 of about 0.24% or equal to 911,805 abusers. Meanwhile,
Perpus
takaa
n 2008 to 2011 of about 0.24% or equal to 911,805 abusers. Meanwhile, prevalence rate of drug abuse from 2011 to 2014 decreased about
Perpus
takaa
n prevalence rate of drug abuse from 2011 to 2014 decreased about 0.05% or equal to 251.555 abusers. However, until 2017, the prevalence
Perpus
takaa
n 0.05% or equal to 251.555 abusers. However, until 2017, the prevalence rate decreased 0.14% per year. The declining prevalence rate can be
Perpus
takaa
n
rate decreased 0.14% per year. The declining prevalence rate can be seen also in 2017 survey which shows that the prevalence rate among
Perpus
takaa
n
seen also in 2017 survey which shows that the prevalence rate among workers decreased from 12.8% in 2012 into 9.1% in 2017 (Health
Perpus
takaa
n
workers decreased from 12.8% in 2012 into 9.1% in 2017 (Health Research Center and BNN, 2017).
Perpus
takaa
n
Research Center and BNN, 2017).
The declining prevalence rate of drug abuse is one of the indicators Perpus
takaa
n
The declining prevalence rate of drug abuse is one of the indicators
BNNecstasy pills, and 627.84 kilogram of liquid ecstasy. In addition, BNN
BNNecstasy pills, and 627.84 kilogram of liquid ecstasy. In addition, BNN
BNNvehicles, property, land, jewelry, cash money, and money in the account
BNNvehicles, property, land, jewelry, cash money, and money in the account
5Prevalence Survey 2018
this, BNN had conducted several surveys on drug abuse of which the result, especialy the prevalence rate of drug abuse, has been applied by Bappenas to arrange the main target in Defense and Security development 2015-2019. The result of the research has been used also in the annual international report like CND Annual Meeting, ASOD
etc.
The negative impact of drugs has made everyone worried since Indonesian population and the wide territory are a major market for drug dealers. It is not only the duty of the police to anticipate drug
ministry and state institution. Presidential Instruction No.6 of 2018 on National Action Plan of P4GN has become a legal basis to all ministry and state institution to implement this activity.
1.2. Issues
Drug abuse tends to increase in the community. Hence, data on drug abuse should be updated through the years. It is also important
expected to be able to answer drugs development in Indonesia through the prevalence rate. Related to this, the main questions in this research are the level of prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018.
The questions of the research are: 1. How high is the prevalence rate of drug abuse among workers,
students, and university students?2. How is drug abuse among workers, students, and university
students being described according to the history of usage, method, and distribution pattern?
3. students, and university students?
4. What is the description of risky behaviour (smoking, drinking alcohol) toward drugs among workers, students, and university students?
Perpus
takaa
n Drug abuse tends to increase in the community. Hence, data on
Perpus
takaa
n Drug abuse tends to increase in the community. Hence, data on
drug abuse should be updated through the years. It is also important
Perpus
takaa
n drug abuse should be updated through the years. It is also important
Perpus
takaa
n
expected to be able to answer drugs development in Indonesia through
Perpus
takaa
n
expected to be able to answer drugs development in Indonesia through the prevalence rate. Related to this, the main questions in this research
Perpus
takaa
n
the prevalence rate. Related to this, the main questions in this research are the level of prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018.
Perpus
takaa
n
are the level of prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018.
The questions of the research are: Perpus
takaa
n
The questions of the research are: 1. How high is the prevalence rate of drug abuse among workers, Perp
ustak
aan
1. How high is the prevalence rate of drug abuse among workers,
BNNministry and state institution. Presidential Instruction No.6 of 2018 on
BNNministry and state institution. Presidential Instruction No.6 of 2018 on National Action Plan of P4GN has become a legal basis to all ministry
BNNNational Action Plan of P4GN has become a legal basis to all ministry and state institution to implement this activity.
BNNand state institution to implement this activity.
6 Prevalence Survey 2018
5. What is the level of knowledge on drugs and attitude toward the danger of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students?
6. What is the intervention of P4GN program both from the government and non-government institution among workers, students, and university students?
In addition, the questions related to household are: 1. How vulnerable is the family in the community toward the danger of
drugs?2. How is the household environment being exposed to the danger of
drugs?3. How is the household’s sensitivity to the danger of drugs? 4. How is the household being exposed to the danger of drugs?5. What is the household’s strategy not to be exposed to the danger of
drugs?
1.3. Objective and Target
rate of drug abuse among workers, students and university students, as well as to identify the vulnerability rate of household in dealing with drug threat in 13 provinces in 2018. Here are details of the particular objectives related to prevalence rate of drug abuse: 1. To identify the estimated prevalence of drug abuse among workers,
students, and university students according to usage time and category.
2. To know the illustration of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students according to the history of usage, method, and distribution pattern.
3. students, and university students.
4. alcohol, and sexual intercourse) toward drug among workers, students and university students.
5. the danger of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students.
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n rate of drug abuse among workers, students and university students, as
Perpus
takaa
n rate of drug abuse among workers, students and university students, as well as to identify the vulnerability rate of household in dealing with
Perpus
takaa
n
well as to identify the vulnerability rate of household in dealing with drug threat in 13 provinces in 2018. Here are details of the particular
Perpus
takaa
n
drug threat in 13 provinces in 2018. Here are details of the particular objectives related to prevalence rate of drug abuse:
Perpus
takaa
n
objectives related to prevalence rate of drug abuse: 1. To identify the estimated prevalence of drug abuse among workers,
Perpus
takaa
n
1. To identify the estimated prevalence of drug abuse among workers, students, and university students according to usage time and Perp
ustak
aan
students, and university students according to usage time and
BNN3. How is the household’s sensitivity to the danger of drugs?
BNN3. How is the household’s sensitivity to the danger of drugs? 4. How is the household being exposed to the danger of drugs?
BNN4. How is the household being exposed to the danger of drugs?5. What is the household’s strategy not to be exposed to the danger of
BNN5. What is the household’s strategy not to be exposed to the danger of
7Prevalence Survey 2018
6. government and non-government institution among workers, students, and university students.
The targets of this research are workers, students, and university student as well as household members.
1.4. Conceptual Framework
Drugs cover narcotics, psychotropics, and addictive substances. The term of drugs is not stated in laws and regulations. Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics only says that narcotics are substances or drugs from plants or non-plants, either synthetic or semi-synthetic, which can cause degradation or alteration of consciousness, loss of taste, reduction or elimination of the pain, and can lead to dependency.
Synthetic narcotics are category of narcotics which require synthetic process for medical and research need as analgesic. The examples are amphetamine, methadone, dextropropakasifen, dexamphetamine, and others. Meanwhile, semi-synthetic narcotics are substances/drugs which are produced through isolation, extraction and others such as heroin, morphine, codeine, and others. Outside this category is called natural narcotics, namely substances and drugs which can be directly consumed as narcotics without fermentation, isolation, and other process since they can be directly consumed with simple process. The examples of natural narcotics are marijuana and coca leaf.
Based on Article 6 Paragraph 1 Law on Narcotics, narcotics are
Perpus
takaa
n Drugs cover narcotics, psychotropics, and addictive substances.
Perpus
takaa
n Drugs cover narcotics, psychotropics, and addictive substances. The term of drugs is not stated in laws and regulations. Law No.35 of
Perpus
takaa
n The term of drugs is not stated in laws and regulations. Law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics only says that narcotics are substances or drugs
Perpus
takaa
n 2009 on Narcotics only says that narcotics are substances or drugs from plants or non-plants, either synthetic or semi-synthetic, which
Perpus
takaa
n from plants or non-plants, either synthetic or semi-synthetic, which can cause degradation or alteration of consciousness, loss of taste,
Perpus
takaa
n
can cause degradation or alteration of consciousness, loss of taste, reduction or elimination of the pain, and can lead to dependency.
Perpus
takaa
n
reduction or elimination of the pain, and can lead to dependency.
Synthetic narcotics are category of narcotics which require synthetic
Perpus
takaa
n
Synthetic narcotics are category of narcotics which require synthetic process for medical and research need as analgesic. The examples are Perp
ustak
aan
process for medical and research need as analgesic. The examples are amphetamine, methadone, dextropropakasifen, dexamphetamine, and Perp
ustak
aan
amphetamine, methadone, dextropropakasifen, dexamphetamine, and
BNN
8 Prevalence Survey 2018
and cannot be used in theraphy, having very high potential of causing
or for the development of science, having high potential of causing dependency), and narcotics category III (narcotics which are purposed for medication and used a alot in theraphy and/or for the development of science, having low potential of causing dependency).
Appendix I of Law on Narcotics contains types of narcotics in category I, category II, and category III. However, with the consideration on the increase of new drugs abuse with very high potential to cause dependency which is not included in the category listed in Appendix I of Law No 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Minister of Health Regulation No.13 of 2014 on Change of Narcotics Category, based on Minister of Health Regulation No.2 of 2017 on Change of Narcotics category, narcotics is then categorized into category I, II and III. The Minister of Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category is then changed again into category I, II and III.
Psychotropic is regulated in Law No.5 of 1997 on Psychotropic. Article 1 of the Law on Psychotropic states that psychotropic is substance or drug, both non drugs-natural and synthetic, with
system which causes typical change in mental and behaviour activity.
Psychotropic which has the potential to cause a dependency syndrome is grouped into 4 categories, namely psychotropic category I (psychotropic which can only be used for the purpose of science and can not be used in theraphy, but it has very strong potential to cause dependency syndrome), psychotropic category II (psychotropic which is used for medication and can be used in therapy and/or for the purpose of science, having moderate potential to cause dependency syndrome), psychotropic category III (psychotropic wich is used for medication and is used alot in theraphy and/or for the purpose of science, having moderate potential to cause dependency syndrome), and psychotropic category IV (psychotropic which is used for medication and widely used in theraphy and/or for the purpose of science, having light potential to cause dependency syndrome).
Perpus
takaa
n Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category
Perpus
takaa
n Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category is then changed again into category I, II and III.
Perpus
takaa
n is then changed again into category I, II and III.
Psychotropic is regulated in Law No.5 of 1997 on Psychotropic.
Perpus
takaa
n Psychotropic is regulated in Law No.5 of 1997 on Psychotropic.
Article 1 of the Law on Psychotropic states that psychotropic is
Perpus
takaa
n Article 1 of the Law on Psychotropic states that psychotropic is substance or drug, both non drugs-natural and synthetic, with
Perpus
takaa
n
substance or drug, both non drugs-natural and synthetic, with
Perpus
takaa
n
system which causes typical change in mental and behaviour activity.
Perpus
takaa
n
system which causes typical change in mental and behaviour activity.
Psychotropic which has the potential to cause a dependency Perpus
takaa
n
Psychotropic which has the potential to cause a dependency syndrome is grouped into 4 categories, namely psychotropic category Perp
ustak
aan
syndrome is grouped into 4 categories, namely psychotropic category
BNNof Law No 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Minister of Health Regulation
BNNof Law No 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Minister of Health Regulation No.13 of 2014 on Change of Narcotics Category, based on Minister
BNNNo.13 of 2014 on Change of Narcotics Category, based on Minister of Health Regulation No.2 of 2017 on Change of Narcotics category,
BNNof Health Regulation No.2 of 2017 on Change of Narcotics category, narcotics is then categorized into category I, II and III. The Minister of BNNnarcotics is then categorized into category I, II and III. The Minister of Health Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category BNNHealth Regulation No.58 of 2017 on the Change of Narcotics Category
9Prevalence Survey 2018
Psychotropic category I is psychotropic which can only be used for the purpose of science and is not used in theraphy. It has very strong potential to cause dependency syndrome. The examples of this psychotropic are:
MDMA (Methylene Dioxy Meth Amphethamine), or Inex (Methylene Dioxy Meth Amphethamine), or Inex (Methylene Dioxy Meth Amphethamine),Shabu or UbasPsilocybin and psilosinLSD atorau Lisergic Acid Dietilamine derived from a type of ergot fungus that grows on white wheat and rye. Meskalina (peyote)
medication and can be used in a therapy and/or for the purpose of science as and has strong potential to cause dependency syndrome. Substances in this category are: amphetamine, methamfetamine, metacualona, methylphenidate, and etc.
medication and used alot in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has moderate potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types of psychotropic in this category are: aKatina and etc.
medication and widely used in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has light potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types of psychotropic in this category are: barbital, bromazepam, diazepam, estazolam, phenobarbital, clobazam, lorazepam, nitrazepam and etc. estazolam, phenobarbital, clobazam, lorazepam, nitrazepam and etc. estazolam, phenobarbital, clobazam, lorazepam, nitrazepam
Psychotropic category I and II based on Article 153 law No.35 of 2009 on Narcotics has been revoked and is included in the category of narcotics as mentioned in the Appendix of Law on Narcotics. The emergence of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) in the last several years has potentially endangered the community since it is not under the international control. This substance has caused the increasing addiction. Many people have been hospitalized for consuming this substance. It even causes death. These psychoactive substances are usually known as ‘legal’ alternative as substances that are not under
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n medication and used alot in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of
Perpus
takaa
n medication and used alot in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has moderate potential in causing dependency syndrome.
Perpus
takaa
n science and has moderate potential in causing dependency syndrome.
Perpus
takaa
n Types of psychotropic in this category are: a
Perpus
takaa
n Types of psychotropic in this category are: a
Perpus
takaa
n
medication and widely used in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of
Perpus
takaa
n
medication and widely used in a therapy and/or used for the purpose of science and has light potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types Perp
ustak
aan
science and has light potential in causing dependency syndrome. Types of psychotropic in this category are: Perp
ustak
aan
of psychotropic in this category are:
BNNmedication and can be used in a therapy and/or for the purpose of
BNNmedication and can be used in a therapy and/or for the purpose of science as and has strong potential to cause dependency syndrome.
BNNscience as and has strong potential to cause dependency syndrome. amphetamine, methamfetamine,
BNNamphetamine, methamfetamine,
10 Prevalence Survey 2018
risk.4 The Ministry of Health Regulation No.3 of 2017 has changed the category of psychotropic, especially psychotropic category II and IV. The Ministry of Health Regulation No.57 of 2017 has changed again the psychotropic category II and IV as mentioned in Appendix 2.
NPS has been well known in the market as “designer drugs”, “legal highs”, “herbal highs”, “bath salts”, “research chemicals”, or “laboratory reagents”. In order to clarify the terminology of this issue, UNODC only
as “drugs abuse, both in the form of genuine or mixture, which is not controlled by Single Convention on Narcotics Drug of 1961 or Convention on Psychotripic Substances of 1971 but causes a threat to the public’s health. The term “new”does not always refer to new discovery (several
new substances emerge in the market and are not listed in the above conventions. Types or main category of NPS as delivered by UNODC
Appendix 3. For cases in Indonesia, especially, BNN in its website in 5
1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and its Impact
Article 7 of Law on Narcotics says that narcotics may only be used for the purpose of health services and/or science and technology. Hence, the use of narcotics outside these purposes can be categorized as abuse. It is based on provisions in Article 1 No.15 Law on Narcotics which says that drugs abuse is people who use narcotics without rights or against the law.
Continous use of drugs may cause dependency which refers to Article 1 No.14 Law of Narcotics as a condition marked with a motivation to use drugs continuously with increasing dose to create the same effect and if the use is reduced and/or stopped suddenly, it will generate typical physical and psychological symptoms.
4 New psychoactive substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches, Commission on Narcotic Drugs
Fifty-ninth session, Vienna, 14-22 March 20145 National Narcotics Board. List of NPS Substances already identified in Indonesia. 31 January 2016 http://lab.
bnn.go.id/nps_alert_system/12.%20Lampiran%20zat%20NPS%20terdeteksi%20di%20Indonesia.php
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Appendix 3. For cases in Indonesia, especially, BNN in its website in
Perpus
takaa
n Appendix 3. For cases in Indonesia, especially, BNN in its website in
Perpus
takaa
n 1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and its Impact
Perpus
takaa
n 1.4.2. Drugs Abuse and its Impact
Article 7 of Law on Narcotics says that narcotics may only be
Perpus
takaa
n
Article 7 of Law on Narcotics says that narcotics may only be used for the purpose of health services and/or science and technology.
Perpus
takaa
n
used for the purpose of health services and/or science and technology. Hence, the use of narcotics outside these purposes can be categorized
Perpus
takaa
n
Hence, the use of narcotics outside these purposes can be categorized as abuse. It is based on provisions in Article 1 No.15 Law on Narcotics Perp
ustak
aan
as abuse. It is based on provisions in Article 1 No.15 Law on Narcotics which says that drugs abuse is people who use narcotics without rights Perp
ustak
aan
which says that drugs abuse is people who use narcotics without rights
BNNhealth. The term “new”does not always refer to new discovery (several
BNNhealth. The term “new”does not always refer to new discovery (several
BNNnew substances emerge in the market and are not listed in the above
BNNnew substances emerge in the market and are not listed in the above conventions. Types or main category of NPS as delivered by UNODC BNNconventions. Types or main category of NPS as delivered by UNODC BNN
11Prevalence Survey 2018
There are several factors which motivate people to abuse drugs. The factors are grouped into three sources, namely:1. Causative factors from oneself, consisting of:
a) Great curiosity to try, unconseously and without a long thinking on the impact in the future.
b) Curiosity to try. c) Having fun. d) Willing to be accepted in a certain community or environment. e) Workaholic to be always in an activity by using stimulant. f) Running from problem, boring, or life bitterness. g) Feeling exhausted and lossing the spirit to study. h) Suffering from anxiety and bitterness.i) Addicted to smoking and drinking alcohol. These two things
lead to narcotics abuse. j) Self-entertaining and enjoying life to the fullest.k) Lossing weight or obesity by consuming excessive medicine for
appetite control.l) Feeling inattentive, unacceptable or unloved, in a family or social
environment.m) Inability to adjust to the environment.n) Ignorance on the effects and dangers of drug abuse.o) The misconception that trying drugs will never cause a problem.p) Not able or dare to face pressure from the environment or social
groups to use drugs.q) Unable to say NO to drugs.
2. Environmental factors, consisting of:a) Broken home.b) Having a drug user or abuser or dealer father, mother or both or
sibling. c) Being in a wrong association or community where one of or
several and all members are drug users or dealers.d) Visiting nightclubs frequently (cafe, discotheque, karaoke, etc).e) Having a spare time, dropout or unemployed. f) A less/not harmonious family. g) A family with no love, communication, openness, attention, and
respect between the family members.
Perpus
takaa
n l) Feeling inattentive, unacceptable or unloved, in a family or social
Perpus
takaa
n l) Feeling inattentive, unacceptable or unloved, in a family or social
m) Inability to adjust to the environment.
Perpus
takaa
n m) Inability to adjust to the environment.n) Ignorance on the effects and dangers of drug abuse.
Perpus
takaa
n n) Ignorance on the effects and dangers of drug abuse.o) The misconception that trying drugs will never cause a problem.
Perpus
takaa
n
o) The misconception that trying drugs will never cause a problem.p) Not able or dare to face pressure from the environment or social
Perpus
takaa
n
p) Not able or dare to face pressure from the environment or social groups to use drugs.
Perpus
takaa
n
groups to use drugs.q) Unable to say NO to drugs.
Perpus
takaa
n
q) Unable to say NO to drugs.
2. Environmental factors, consisting of:Perpus
takaa
n
2. Environmental factors, consisting of:
BNNi) Addicted to smoking and drinking alcohol. These two things
BNNi) Addicted to smoking and drinking alcohol. These two things
j) Self-entertaining and enjoying life to the fullest.
BNNj) Self-entertaining and enjoying life to the fullest.k) Lossing weight or obesity by consuming excessive medicine for BNNk) Lossing weight or obesity by consuming excessive medicine for
12 Prevalence Survey 2018
h) Having authoritarian parents. i) Permissive, indifferent, permissible, and less/no supervision
parents/family.j) busy parents/family.k) A social environment with high competition and uncertainty. l) A hectic urban life, people are not known personally, there is no
primary relationship, disintegration, loss of social control from
high crime rate.m) Poverty, unemployment, dropouts and abandonment.
3. Drugs availability factorDrugs have become a driving factor for someone to use drugs when:a) Drugs are easily obtained and bought.b) Price of drugs is cheap and affordable by people’s purchasing
power. c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form
of packaging
e) There are still many illegal drug laboratories that have not been revealed.
g) More accessible internet that provides information on drug making.
syndicates.
Uncontrolled drug use will ruin someone’s life. The impact is 207,400 death cases due to drug abuse in the world.6 The use of drugs in general and the use of psychotropic which is not according to the rules will create an effect that will endanger the body. The effect of drug abuse can be divided into three, namely:
6 World Drugs Report Tahun 2016. UNODC
Perpus
takaa
n c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form
Perpus
takaa
n c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n e) There are still many illegal drug laboratories that have not been
Perpus
takaa
n e) There are still many illegal drug laboratories that have not been
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
g) More accessible internet that provides information on drug
Perpus
takaa
n
g) More accessible internet that provides information on drug making. Perp
ustak
aan
making. Perpus
takaa
n BNN
Drugs have become a driving factor for someone to use drugs when:
BNNDrugs have become a driving factor for someone to use drugs when:
b) Price of drugs is cheap and affordable by people’s purchasing
BNNb) Price of drugs is cheap and affordable by people’s purchasing
c) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form BNNc) Drugs are increasingly diverse in type, method of use, and form
13Prevalence Survey 2018
1. Depressants, which suppress the central nerves system and reduce the functional activities of the body so that the user feels calm. They can even make the user sleep and unconscious. The case of overdosing can lead to death. Types of depressant drugs include opioda, and various derivatives such as morphine and heroin. The example is Putaw.
2. Stimulants, stimulate the functions of body and increase Stimulants, stimulate the functions of body and increase Stimulantsexcitement and awareness. Types of stimulants: Caffeine, Cocaine, Amphetamine. Examples that are now often used are meth and Ecstasy.
3. Hallucinogens, the main effect is to change the perception or cause Hallucinogens, the main effect is to change the perception or cause Hallucinogenshallucinations. Hallucinogens mostly come from plants such as mescaline from cactus and psilocybin from mold-fungi. In addition, there are also mixed in the laboratory such as LSD. The most widely used is marijuana or cannabis.
Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse are physical, psychiological, and socio-environmental impact. These various impacts have encouraged the government to declare a war against narcotics.
The impacts of narcotics abuse to the physical are:a. Disorders in nerves system (neurological) such as seizures,
hallucinations, disturbance of consciousness and peripheral nerve damage.
b. Disorders of the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular) such as acute infections of the heart muscle and circulatory disorders.
c. Skin disorders (dermatological) such as abdominal (abscess), allergies and eczema.
d. Lungs disorders (pulmonary) such as suppression of respiratory
e. Frequent headaches, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, increased body temperature, muscle wasting of the liver and insomnia.
f. Disruption of endocrine hormones, such as decreased function of reproductive hormones (estrogen, progesterone, testosterone) and sexual dysfunction
g. Disruption of reproductive health in adolescent girls, including changes in menstrual periods, menstrual irregularities or amenorrhea.
Perpus
takaa
n Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse
Perpus
takaa
n Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse are physical, psychiological, and socio-environmental impact. These
Perpus
takaa
n are physical, psychiological, and socio-environmental impact. These various impacts have encouraged the government to declare a war
Perpus
takaa
n various impacts have encouraged the government to declare a war
Perpus
takaa
n
The impacts of narcotics abuse to the physical are:
Perpus
takaa
n
The impacts of narcotics abuse to the physical are:a. Disorders in nerves system (neurological) such as seizures,
Perpus
takaa
n
a. Disorders in nerves system (neurological) such as seizures, hallucinations, disturbance of consciousness and peripheral nerve
Perpus
takaa
n
hallucinations, disturbance of consciousness and peripheral nerve
b. Disorders of the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular) such as Perpus
takaa
n
b. Disorders of the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular) such as acute infections of the heart muscle and circulatory disorders.Perp
ustak
aan
acute infections of the heart muscle and circulatory disorders.
BNNmescaline from cactus and psilocybin from mold-fungi. In addition,
BNNmescaline from cactus and psilocybin from mold-fungi. In addition, there are also mixed in the laboratory such as LSD. The most widely
BNNthere are also mixed in the laboratory such as LSD. The most widely
Haryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse BNNHaryanto (2012) says that the negative impacts of drug abuse
14 Prevalence Survey 2018
h. For addicts, abusers and victims of narcotics abuse through syringes, especially the use of needles interchangeably, the risk can be contracted by diseases such as hepatitis B, C, and HIV which is no cure until now.
i. Narcotics abuse can be fatal in the case of overdose when narcotics consumption exceeds the body’s ability to accept it, and it can even cause death.
The physical impact includes: a. Work slowly, work carelessly, often tense and anxious.
c. Aggressive, being violent and having brutal behaviour.d. to concentrate.e. Tend to hurt oneself, feeling insecure, even wanting to suicide
The impacts of drug abuse to socio-environment are:a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by
the environment.b. Troublesome and a burden on the family.c. Education is disrupted and the future is bleak.
The physical, psychological, and social impacts are closely related. The physical dependency will cause tremendous pain (withdrawal) if abusers are not consuming drugs on time and strong psychological stimulus to consume drugs (the slang word is suggest). The physical suggest). The physical suggestand psychological impacts also correlate with social impact such as the suggestion to lie to parents, stealing, being grumpy, manipulative, etc.
Besides negative impacts to the users, narcotics also give negative impacts to the national security. As we know, national security is a nation’s ability to face and overcome threats, challenges, obstacles, and interference both from inside or outside directly or indirectly to guarantee the identity, integrity, life of the nation and state in achieving national goals. In other word, national security is the nation’s ability to defend its life and lives from threats. This ability is achieved only if the people are in healthy condition, physicaly and spiritually. Hence, if many nationals use narcotics, this nation would be weak and would not be able to face the threats.
Perpus
takaa
n a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by
Perpus
takaa
n a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by
b. Troublesome and a burden on the family.
Perpus
takaa
n b. Troublesome and a burden on the family.c. Education is disrupted and the future is bleak.
Perpus
takaa
n c. Education is disrupted and the future is bleak.
The physical, psychological, and social impacts are closely related.
Perpus
takaa
n
The physical, psychological, and social impacts are closely related. The physical dependency will cause tremendous pain (withdrawal)
Perpus
takaa
n
The physical dependency will cause tremendous pain (withdrawal) if abusers are not consuming drugs on time and strong psychological
Perpus
takaa
n
if abusers are not consuming drugs on time and strong psychological stimulus to consume drugs (the slang word is
Perpus
takaa
n
stimulus to consume drugs (the slang word is and psychological impacts also correlate with social impact such as the Perp
ustak
aan
and psychological impacts also correlate with social impact such as the suggestion to lie to parents, stealing, being grumpy, manipulative, etc.Perp
ustak
aan
suggestion to lie to parents, stealing, being grumpy, manipulative, etc.
BNNe. Tend to hurt oneself, feeling insecure, even wanting to suicide
BNNe. Tend to hurt oneself, feeling insecure, even wanting to suicide
The impacts of drug abuse to socio-environment are:BNNThe impacts of drug abuse to socio-environment are:a. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by BNNa. Mental disorders, anti-social and immoral as well as ostracized by
15Prevalence Survey 2018
1.4.3. Worker and Drugs
Worker is a drug abuse prone-social group. Based on drug case
with the declining percentage of 10.07% from 51,464 cases in 2017 into 46,283 cases in 2018. The declining suspects occurred in the group of Civil Servants from 422 in 2017 into 399 in 2018, private sector workers from 25,984 in 2017 into 20,150 in 2018, entrepreneurs from 17,200 in 2017 into 16,483 in 2018.7
Meanwhile, the increasing suspects occurred in the group of Police/Indonesian Army from 367 in 2017 into 426 in 2018, farmers from 2,625 in 2017 into 2,628 in 2018, labor from 6,902 in 2017 into 7,540 in 2018, and unemployment from 8,650 in 2017 into 9,256 in 2018. The survey by BNN and PPK UI shows the estimation of prevalence rate in students and workers in drug abuse as shown in the following table
Table 1 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence
Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017
Male Female % Prevalence
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male Female
Workers living in
boarding house
829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7
Workers not living in
boarding house
1,582,573 1,743,573 314,445 347,340 2.9 0.9
Students living in
boarding house
254,777 254,777 54,623 59,935 11.1 4.2254,777 254,777 54,623 59,935 11.1 4.2
Students not living
in boarding house
464,440 510,909 126,405 141,798 4.7 1.5
Female Sex Workers - - 63,191 69,719 - 27.6Female Sex Workers - - 63,191 69,719 - 27.6
Street children 12,671 13,802 1,949 2,187 17.4 10.8
Household 176,640 203,393 63,359 70,361 1.2 0.2Household 176,640 203,393 63,359 70,361 1.2 0.2
Source: BNN & PPKUI, 2017
7 BNN, Summary of Journal on Drug Abuse and Illicit Traficking Prevention and Eradication (P4GN), 2017, 2018 Edition
Perpus
takaa
n Table 1
Perpus
takaa
n Table 1 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence
Perpus
takaa
n Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence
Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017
Perpus
takaa
n Rate According to Gender and Types of Group, 2017
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Male
Perpus
takaa
n
Male
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male F
Perpus
takaa
n
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male F
829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7
Perpus
takaa
n
829,826 924,826 134,209 148,816 9.0 2.7
Workers not living in Perpus
takaa
n
Workers not living in 1,582,573 1,743,573 314,445 347,340 2.9 0.9Perpus
takaa
n
1,582,573 1,743,573 314,445 347,340 2.9 0.9
BNNfrom 2,625 in 2017 into 2,628 in 2018, labor from 6,902 in 2017 into
BNNfrom 2,625 in 2017 into 2,628 in 2018, labor from 6,902 in 2017 into 7,540 in 2018, and unemployment from 8,650 in 2017 into 9,256 in 2018.
BNN7,540 in 2018, and unemployment from 8,650 in 2017 into 9,256 in 2018. The survey by BNN and PPK UI shows the estimation of prevalence rate
BNNThe survey by BNN and PPK UI shows the estimation of prevalence rate in students and workers in drug abuse as shown in the following tableBNNin students and workers in drug abuse as shown in the following table
16 Prevalence Survey 2018
1.4.4 Students and Drugs
Each student has different need and shows different growth rate.
to students in formal schools from Junior High School, Senior High School and University. The group of student is a social group which is prone to drug abuse.
trend in drug case relatively with the percentage of 10.07% from 51,464 cases in 2017 into 46,283 cases in 2018. The declining suspects occurred in university students from 1,327 in 2017 into 1,282 in 2018. In the group of students, the increase was from 1,050 in 2017 into 1,127 in 2018.8 Based on research by BNN and PPK UI in 2016, there was a declining prevalence rate in pupils and university students in 2011-2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in male students is higher than female students. Based on the residence, the prevalence rate of students living in boarding house is higher than those who are not living in the boarding house. It occurs both in male and female students as shown in the following table.
Table 2 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017
Source : BNN & PPKUI, 2017.
Male Female % Prevalence
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male Female
Students living in
boarding house
254,777 254,777 54,623 59,935 11.1 4.2
Students not
living in boarding
house
464,440 510,909 126.,405 141,798 4.7 1.5
8 BNN, Summary of Journal on Drug Abuse and Illicit Traficking Prevention and Eradication (P4GN), 2017, 2018 Edition
Perpus
takaa
n 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in
Perpus
takaa
n 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in male students is higher than female students. Based on the residence,
Perpus
takaa
n male students is higher than female students. Based on the residence, the prevalence rate of students living in boarding house is higher than
Perpus
takaa
n the prevalence rate of students living in boarding house is higher than those who are not living in the boarding house. It occurs both in male
Perpus
takaa
n those who are not living in the boarding house. It occurs both in male and female students as shown in the following table.
Perpus
takaa
n and female students as shown in the following table.
Table 2
Perpus
takaa
n
Table 2 Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence
Perpus
takaa
n
Estimation on the Number of Drug Users and Current User Prevalence Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017
Perpus
takaa
n
Rate Among Students According to Gender and Type of Group, 2017
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
MalePerpus
takaa
n
Male
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male FPerpus
takaa
n
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Male F
BNNIn the group of students, the increase was from 1,050 in 2017 into 1,127
BNNIn the group of students, the increase was from 1,050 in 2017 into 1,127
Based on research by BNN and PPK UI in 2016, there was
BNN Based on research by BNN and PPK UI in 2016, there was a declining prevalence rate in pupils and university students in 2011-
BNNa declining prevalence rate in pupils and university students in 2011-2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in BNN2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in 2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in BNN2016. It increased again in 2017. In general, the drug abuse prevalence in
17Prevalence Survey 2018
Based on BNN and PPK UI research in 2016, there was a declining prevalence rate in students and university students in 2011-2016. In 2011, the prevalence rate was 2.9% and declined into 1.9% in 2016. It increased again in 2017.
1.4.5 Household and Drugs
unit in the society consisting of head of family and family members living in a place under the same roof and being interdependence. Family is also
of father, mother and children. 2. Extended family, a nuclear family added with relatives living in the same house. 3. Serial family, a woman and a man who are married more than once and are one nuclear family. 4. Single family, a family with divorce or death. 5. Composite family, polygamous family and living together. 6. Cohabitation, two people forming a family without a marriage.9
danger of drug. Hence, family resistance is a condition created to face the danger of drug abuse. If the family resistance is created, the functions of family will work well to protect teh family from the danger of drugs. Family serves the function of protection. Family may also serve as an institution to give a protection to its family members and to give a safe and peaceful feeling.
A complete family is very effective since the family gives love. It means that there is love between the family members. Thus, there is a strong bond in the family. If a family has it, then any life problems faced by the family members would be able to be handled and will not use drugs easily as the solution to the life problems. A family has the function to grow the religious basis to its children and family members. A family also has the function to educate children before entering the formal schools. A family should also educate children from the early age to the growing and forming personality stage.
9 Irwanteasosial.blogspot.co.id, downloaded on 7 Maret 2018
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n danger of drug. Hence, family resistance is a condition created to face the
Perpus
takaa
n danger of drug. Hence, family resistance is a condition created to face the danger of drug abuse. If the family resistance is created, the functions of
Perpus
takaa
n
danger of drug abuse. If the family resistance is created, the functions of family will work well to protect teh family from the danger of drugs. Family
Perpus
takaa
n
family will work well to protect teh family from the danger of drugs. Family serves the function of protection. Family may also serve as an institution
Perpus
takaa
n
serves the function of protection. Family may also serve as an institution to give a protection to its family members and to give a safe and peaceful
Perpus
takaa
n
to give a protection to its family members and to give a safe and peaceful
BNNwith relatives living in the same house. 3. Serial family, a woman and a
BNNwith relatives living in the same house. 3. Serial family, a woman and a man who are married more than once and are one nuclear family. 4. Single
BNNman who are married more than once and are one nuclear family. 4. Single family, a family with divorce or death. 5. Composite family, polygamous
BNNfamily, a family with divorce or death. 5. Composite family, polygamous family and living together. 6. Cohabitation, two people forming a family BNNfamily and living together. 6. Cohabitation, two people forming a family BNN
18 Prevalence Survey 2018
1.5. Research Methodology
1.5.1. Research Location
on drug abuse national projection which was grouped into 3 categories namely: low, moderate, and high category. Each category takes four provinces with the highest national projection, except high category
Indonesia. The provinces in each category are as follow:1. Low category, covering: Bali, West Kalimantan, DIY and South
Sumatera2. Moderate category, covering: East Java, Riau Island, Aceh and
Papua3. High category, covering: DKI Jakarta, North Sumatera, East
Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and West Java.
From each province of the research location, one city (the capital city of the province) is chosen to be studied. The capital city of the province is chosen with the reason that it is the city with most population and has the highest potential of drug abuse. However, there is an exception for particular provinces where the capital city has less population than the other cities. Then, the research location is another city, such as Batam in the Province of Riau Island.
Furthermore, For the capital city of province which lies very close with other regencies, the sample is taken from adjacent-location such as the city of Yogyakarta which is located very closely to the Regency of Sleman and Bantul, but these two regencies are inseparable with the city of Yogyakarta.
1.5.2. Data Collection Technique
This is a quantitative research. Data collection is conducted in two techniques, namely structured interview and secondary data collection. Structured interview is done by using questionnaire to the respondent. The determination of sample quantity is done in quota system (quota sampling).
Perpus
takaa
n From each province of the research location, one city (the
Perpus
takaa
n From each province of the research location, one city (the capital city of the province) is chosen to be studied. The capital city
Perpus
takaa
n capital city of the province) is chosen to be studied. The capital city of the province is chosen with the reason that it is the city with most
Perpus
takaa
n of the province is chosen with the reason that it is the city with most population and has the highest potential of drug abuse. However, there
Perpus
takaa
n population and has the highest potential of drug abuse. However, there is an exception for particular provinces where the capital city has less
Perpus
takaa
n
is an exception for particular provinces where the capital city has less population than the other cities. Then, the research location is another
Perpus
takaa
n
population than the other cities. Then, the research location is another city, such as Batam in the Province of Riau Island.
Perpus
takaa
n
city, such as Batam in the Province of Riau Island.
Furthermore, For the capital city of province which lies very close Perpus
takaa
n
Furthermore, For the capital city of province which lies very close with other regencies, the sample is taken from adjacent-location such Perp
ustak
aan
with other regencies, the sample is taken from adjacent-location such
BNN2. Moderate category, covering: East Java, Riau Island, Aceh and
BNN2. Moderate category, covering: East Java, Riau Island, Aceh and
3. High category, covering: DKI Jakarta, North Sumatera, East
BNN3. High category, covering: DKI Jakarta, North Sumatera, East Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and West Java. BNNKalimantan, South Sulawesi, and West Java.
19Prevalence Survey 2018
A. The Determination on the Number of Sample in The Group of WorkersThe workers taken as samples in this research are workers in
formal sectors in companies with more than 20 workers. It occurs since the company data sampling is using BPS data which only covers medium and large enterprise (with more than 20 workers).
The companies are from 9 business sectors. They are:1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Financial Institution /Real Estate/Rental & Business Services
7. 8. 9. Electricity-gas-drinking water
If a location has less than 9 business sectors, real sectors in the location are taken. Each location takes at least 10 companies. The number of companies is taken proportionally. Meanwhile, the number of respondents in each company is determined proportionally.
B. Sample-taking in the Group of Students and University StudentsThe data collection among students and university students is
The method to determine respondents from the group of students and university students:
Group of students in Junior High School and Senior High School. The distribution of sample in each level is: 100 respondents from Junior High School, 150 respondents from Senior High School, 150 respondents from University Students. The number of respondents from Junior High School is smaller since it is assumed that more drug users are from Senior High School and University Students.
Perpus
takaa
n If a location has less than 9 business sectors, real sectors in the
Perpus
takaa
n If a location has less than 9 business sectors, real sectors in the
location are taken. Each location takes at least 10 companies. The
Perpus
takaa
n location are taken. Each location takes at least 10 companies. The number of companies is taken proportionally. Meanwhile, the number
Perpus
takaa
n number of companies is taken proportionally. Meanwhile, the number of respondents in each company is determined proportionally.
Perpus
takaa
n
of respondents in each company is determined proportionally.
B. Sample-taking in the Group of Students and University Students
Perpus
takaa
n
B. Sample-taking in the Group of Students and University StudentsThe data collection among students and university students is
Perpus
takaa
n
The data collection among students and university students is
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
6. Financial Institution /Real Estate/Rental & Business Services
BNN6. Financial Institution /Real Estate/Rental & Business Services
BNN
20 Prevalence Survey 2018
In line with the quantity of respondents per level, the number of school as sample is: 4 Junior High Schools, 6 Senior High Schools, and 6 Universities. If a location has less than 6 universities, then all universities in that location are taken as samples. The sampling of Junior High School, Senior High School and University uses PPS (Probability Proportional to Size) method. With this method, the chosen school and university are those with more number of students. Meanwhile, the data of Junior High School and Senior High School in the city will be taken from Dapodiknas (basic data on primary and Junior High education) in the address http:// http://dapo.dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/pddapo.dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id/pd, while the data of university will be taken from the website on information of higher education in the address https://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggihttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi.
C. Sample-taking in the Group of HouseholdThe number of sample in household is 5,200 respondents. The
comparison of 60% prone-urban village and 40% non-prone urban village based on the information from BNN or Regional Police in each location.
prone-sub districts randomly. Then, in each sub district, 2 prone-urban villages and 2 non-prone urban villages are taken randomly.
D. Secondary Data CollectionSecondary data collection is done by searching documents in
1.5.3. Data Analysis
All compiled data is entered in SPSS data system. The data processing will also use SPSS program. Before data entry, data cleaning
that there is no more invalid data. Data cleaning is done to make new category in the data obtained from open question.
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n comparison of 60% prone-urban village and 40% non-prone urban village
Perpus
takaa
n comparison of 60% prone-urban village and 40% non-prone urban village based on the information from BNN or Regional Police in each location.
Perpus
takaa
n based on the information from BNN or Regional Police in each location.
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
prone-sub districts randomly. Then, in each sub district, 2 prone-urban
Perpus
takaa
n
prone-sub districts randomly. Then, in each sub district, 2 prone-urban villages and 2 non-prone urban villages are taken randomly.
Perpus
takaa
n
villages and 2 non-prone urban villages are taken randomly.
D. Secondary Data CollectionPerpus
takaa
n
D. Secondary Data CollectionSecondary data collection is done by searching documents in Perp
ustak
aan
Secondary data collection is done by searching documents in
BNNhttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi
BNNhttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggihttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi
BNNhttps://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi
The number of sample in household is 5,200 respondents. The BNNThe number of sample in household is 5,200 respondents. The BNN
21Prevalence Survey 2018
Data analysis is conducted in two ways, namely frequency distribution and cross tabulation inter-variable. To ease the data
document collection.
1.5.4. Research Instrument
The instrument in this research is a questionnaire which is composed in simple form to be easily understood by respondents since
In general, type of question to respondents in the group of students, university students and workers is given to obtain data on:1. Characteristics of respondents (gender, education level, type of
school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding
2. Family background (parents’ job, education of intact parents broken
3. Utilization of spare time outside of school (participation in
6. Impacts of drug use (health impacts, economic impacts, social
8. Intervention of the P4GN Program (type of intervention program, origin of the intervention program, involvement in the program,
9. Drug use behavior (frequency of use, types of drugs, how to use drugs, reasons for use, history of usege, source to obtain drugs,
Meanwhile, type of research question in the group of household is to obtain data on:1. Characteristics of household respondents (gender, age, education
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 2. Family background (parents’ job, education of intact parents broken
Perpus
takaa
n 2. Family background (parents’ job, education of intact parents broken
Perpus
takaa
n 3. Utilization of spare time outside of school (participation in
Perpus
takaa
n 3. Utilization of spare time outside of school (participation in
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
6. Impacts of drug use (health impacts, economic impacts, social
Perpus
takaa
n
6. Impacts of drug use (health impacts, economic impacts, social
Perpus
takaa
n
8. Intervention of the P4GN Program (type of intervention program, Perpus
takaa
n
8. Intervention of the P4GN Program (type of intervention program,
BNNIn general, type of question to respondents in the group of students,
BNNIn general, type of question to respondents in the group of students, university students and workers is given to obtain data on:
BNNuniversity students and workers is given to obtain data on:1. Characteristics of respondents (gender, education level, type of
BNN1. Characteristics of respondents (gender, education level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding BNNschool (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding BNN
22 Prevalence Survey 2018
2. Family background (number of family members, parents’ occupation, education of parents and family members, intact/broken home
3. Environmental safety from the danger of drugs (drug exposure in
4. 5. 6. Family strategies in dealing with the danger of drugs.
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
23
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG STUDENTS ANDUNIVERSITY STUDENTS
II
Perpus
takaa
n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE
Perpus
takaa
n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG STUDENTS AND
Perpus
takaa
n AMONG STUDENTS AND
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Perpus
takaa
n UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
BNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEBNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE
24
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
25Prevalence Survey 2018
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG STUDENTS AND UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
The result of survey which is based on several key questions reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding house, with parents, living with relatives, dormitory), pocket money, family background (parents’ occupation, intact/broken home parents’ education, closeness with parents), the use of spare time outside of school (participation in organizations/extracurricular) and
aspects which are as important as the respondents’ characteristics are respodents’ knowledge and attitude to drugs and drug use impact (health impact, economic impact, and social impact).
2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic
In the part of respondents’ characteristics, several data to be exposed are: gender and education level, current place of residence, monthly pocket money, and parents’ condition.
2.1.1. Gender and Level of Education
From the total 5,200 respondents from the group of students and university students, the majority is female with 2,761 (53.1%), while male respondents are 2,439 (46.9%). The gap between male and female respondents is not too standout. Hence, it indirectly emphasizes that
II
Perpus
takaa
n reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education
Perpus
takaa
n reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence
Perpus
takaa
n level, type of school (private, public, religious), place of residence (boarding house, with parents, living with relatives, dormitory), pocket
Perpus
takaa
n (boarding house, with parents, living with relatives, dormitory), pocket money, family background (parents’ occupation, intact/broken home
Perpus
takaa
n money, family background (parents’ occupation, intact/broken home parents’ education, closeness with parents), the use of spare time
Perpus
takaa
n parents’ education, closeness with parents), the use of spare time outside of school (participation in organizations/extracurricular) and
Perpus
takaa
n
outside of school (participation in organizations/extracurricular) and
Perpus
takaa
n
aspects which are as important as the respondents’ characteristics
Perpus
takaa
n
aspects which are as important as the respondents’ characteristics are respodents’ knowledge and attitude to drugs and drug use impact
Perpus
takaa
n
are respodents’ knowledge and attitude to drugs and drug use impact
Perpus
takaa
n
(health impact, economic impact, and social impact). Perpus
takaa
n
(health impact, economic impact, and social impact).
2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic Perp
ustak
aan
2.1. Respondents’ Characteristic
BNNThe result of survey which is based on several key questions BNNThe result of survey which is based on several key questions
reveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education BNNreveals the respondents characteristics comprising gender, education
26 Prevalence Survey 2018
this survey is not gender-bias. The respondents sampling is based on the sampling method as mentioned in the previous chapter..
Graphic 1. Respondents’ Gender
From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3 clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University Student. The number of respondents in this survey should be equal. The percentage of students is 25.3% in Junior High School and 38.3% in Senior High School. Meanwhile, respondent in university is 36.4%. The comparison between three clusters can be seen in Graphic 2 below.
Graphic 2. Respondents’ Level of Education
Male Female
53,9 46,9
Junior High School
and equivalent
Senior High School
and equivalent
University
25,3
38,338,3 36,445,040,035,030,025,020,015,010,0
5,00,0
Perpus
takaa
n From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3
Perpus
takaa
n From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3
clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University
Perpus
takaa
n clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University Student. The number of respondents in this survey should be equal.
Perpus
takaa
n Student. The number of respondents in this survey should be equal. The percentage of students is 25.3% in Junior High School and 38.3% in
Perpus
takaa
n The percentage of students is 25.3% in Junior High School and 38.3% in Senior High School. Meanwhile, respondent in university is 36.4%. The
Perpus
takaa
n Senior High School. Meanwhile, respondent in university is 36.4%. The comparison between three clusters can be seen in Graphic 2 below.
Perpus
takaa
n
comparison between three clusters can be seen in Graphic 2 below.
Graphic 2. Respondents’ Level of Education
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 2. Respondents’ Level of Education
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
40,0 Perpus
takaa
n
40,0
BNNBNN
From the level of education, respondents are divided into 3 BNNFrom the level of education, respondents are divided into 3
clusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University BNNclusters namely: Junior High School, Senior High School, and University
27Prevalence Survey 2018
2.1.2. Current Place of Residence
Based on the result of survey, the majority of respondents are still living with parents (76%). The number of respondents living in the boarding house is in the second biggest number with 16.1%. Respondents studying in university are mostly living in boarding house. Meanwhile, respondents living in school/university dormitory or apartment are less than 5%. This data show that the majority or 2/3 respondents of students and university students are still under parents or relatives’ supervision and guidance since they are still living together. The rest of respondents are living alone without others’ supervision.
Graphic 3. Current Respondents’ Place of Residence
2.1.3. Monthly Pocket Money
The majority of respondents of 55.6% receive monthly pocket money amounting to Rp 100,000 to Rp 499,999. Respondents with monthly pocket money less than Rp 100,000 are the lowest (4.6%). Respondents with monthly pocket money of around Rp 500,000 to Rp 1 million are quite big of around 19.7%. Respondents with bigger amount of pocket money show smaller number. Interestingly, respondents with pocket money higher than Rp 1.5 million are relatively high of 9%. This survey data shows that the majority of students have enough money to buy things as they wish.
Others
Apartement separated with parents
School/university dormitory
Boarding house
Relatives’ house (grandfather, grand-
mother, uncle/aunt)
Parents’ house
2,5
0,4
4,1
16,1
9,9
67,0
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Boarding house
Perpus
takaa
n Boarding house
Perpus
takaa
n
Relatives’ house (grandfather, grand-
Perpus
takaa
n
Relatives’ house (grandfather, grand-
mother, uncle/aunt)
Perpus
takaa
n
mother, uncle/aunt)
Perpus
takaa
n
Parents’ house
Perpus
takaa
n
Parents’ house
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 4,1
Perpus
takaa
n 4,1
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
Current Respondents’ Place of Residence
BNNCurrent Respondents’ Place of Residence
BNNBNN
28 Prevalence Survey 2018
Graphic 4. Respondents’ Monthly Pocket Money
2.1.4. Parents’ Condition
The majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are still alive. Around 10% of respondents are orphans having only a father or a mother. Respondents with deceased parents are 0.92%. The survey shows that the majority of respondents have parents who are still alive and are still under parents’ supervision both directly or indirectly.
Graphic 5. Respondents’ Parents Condition
Both parents are still aliveDeceased fatherDeceased motherDeceased parents
89,10
7,10 2,882,88 0,920,92
9,111,0
19,7
4,6
55,6
> Rp. 1.500.000
Rp. 1.000.000 - 1
.499.999
Rp. 500.000 - 9
99.999
Rp. 100.000 - 4
99.999
< Rp. 100.000
Perpus
takaa
n The majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are
Perpus
takaa
n The majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are
still alive. Around 10% of respondents are orphans having only a father
Perpus
takaa
n still alive. Around 10% of respondents are orphans having only a father or a mother. Respondents with deceased parents are 0.92%. The survey
Perpus
takaa
n or a mother. Respondents with deceased parents are 0.92%. The survey shows that the majority of respondents have parents who are still alive
Perpus
takaa
n shows that the majority of respondents have parents who are still alive and are still under parents’ supervision both directly or indirectly.
Perpus
takaa
n and are still under parents’ supervision both directly or indirectly.
Graphic 5. Respondents’ Parents Condition
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 5. Respondents’ Parents Condition
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
7,10
Perpus
takaa
n
7,10
Perpus
takaa
n
2,88
Perpus
takaa
n
2,882,88
Perpus
takaa
n
2,88
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNThe majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are BNNThe majority of respondents of about 89% have parents who are
29Prevalence Survey 2018
2.2. Knowledge on Drugs
2.2.1. Knowledge on Types of Drugs
Narcotics are divided into several types, namely potent drugs, addictive substances, psychotropic drugs, natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semisynthetic drugs. Potent drugs, natural drugs, and semisynthetic drugs are divided again in several types (see Table 1). The respondents’ knowledge on types of drugs is varied, but the majority of respondents (77.4%) know natural drugs such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda). The second most-known drugs are shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas as synthetic drugs.
For poten drugs, respondents know about headache medicine which is consumed excessively or overdose (49.3%) and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as dextro (dextromethorpan) which is consumed excessively, tramadol, and trihexyphenidyl/trihex/THP/yellow pill are less known by respondents.
Other types of drugs known by respondents are aibon glue, gasoline, markers, and electric hits (64.6%). The high knowledge of respondents on addictive substances is probably since these substances are very close with people’s daily life. Furthermore, the price is relatively cheap and it is easily obtained.
Meanwhile, synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents are shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas (methamphetamines) (71.1%).
tobacco are known by 48.0% respondents. The amphetamine (seed, dex, adderall, dan dexamphetamine) is synthetic drugs which are less known by respondents.
Semi-synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents are heroin (60.20%) and cocaine (59.4%), while other types less known by respondents are putaw (28.5%) and morphine (38.3%). The respondents’
drugs in their surrounding or types of drugs frequently heard. In details,
Perpus
takaa
n medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as
Perpus
takaa
n medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as dextro (dextromethorpan) which is consumed excessively, tramadol, and
Perpus
takaa
n dextro (dextromethorpan) which is consumed excessively, tramadol, and trihexyphenidyl/trihex/THP/yellow pill are less known by respondents.
Perpus
takaa
n trihexyphenidyl/trihex/THP/yellow pill are less known by respondents.
Other types of drugs known by respondents are aibon glue, gasoline,
Perpus
takaa
n Other types of drugs known by respondents are aibon glue, gasoline,
markers, and electric hits (64.6%). The high knowledge of respondents
Perpus
takaa
n
markers, and electric hits (64.6%). The high knowledge of respondents on addictive substances is probably since these substances are very
Perpus
takaa
n
on addictive substances is probably since these substances are very close with people’s daily life. Furthermore, the price is relatively cheap
Perpus
takaa
n
close with people’s daily life. Furthermore, the price is relatively cheap and it is easily obtained.
Perpus
takaa
n
and it is easily obtained.
Meanwhile, synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents Perpus
takaa
n
Meanwhile, synthetic drugs which are mostly known by respondents
BNNare shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas as synthetic drugs.
BNNare shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, and ubas as synthetic drugs.
For poten drugs, respondents know about headache medicine
BNNFor poten drugs, respondents know about headache medicine which is consumed excessively or overdose (49.3%) and headache BNNwhich is consumed excessively or overdose (49.3%) and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as BNNmedicine which is mixed with soda drink (41.1%). Potent drugs such as
30 Prevalence Survey 2018
respondents’ knowledge on types of drugs can be seen in table 3 below.
Table 3. Respondent’s Knowledge on Types of drugs, 2018
Types of drug N %N %
Potent Drug
1 Dextromethorphan consumed excessively1 Dextromethorphan consumed excessively 901 17.30901 17.30
2 Tramadol2 Tramadol 1,105 21.301,105 21.30
3 Trihexyphenidyl3 Trihexyphenidyl 1,163 22.401,163 22.40
4 Medicine for headache consumed excessively4 Medicine for headache consumed excessively 2,564 49.302,564 49.30
5 Medicine for headache mixed with soda5 Medicine for headache mixed with soda 2,137 41.102,137 41.10
Addictive substances
6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers, 6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers,
electric mosquito, etc)
3,357 64.603,357 64.60
Psychotropics
7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda 1,901 36.601,901 36.60
Natural Drug
8 Marijuana8 Marijuana 4,026 77.404,026 77.40
Synthetics Drug
9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla 2.494 48,002.494 48,00
10 Ekstasi10 Ekstasi (inex, XTC, cece, happyfive) 2.533 48,702.533 48,70
11 Amphetamine 11 Amphetamine (Seed, Dex, Adderall, Dexamphetamine) 1.090 21,001.090 21,00
12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas 12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas (Methamphetamines) 3.697 71,103.697 71,10
Semi-Synthetics Drug
13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin) 1,481 28.501,481 28.50
14 Morphine14 Morphine 1,990 38.301,990 38.30
15 Heroin15 Heroin 3,129 60.203,129 60.20
16 Cocaine 3,087 59.4016 Cocaine 3,087 59.4016 Cocaine 3,087 59.4016 Cocaine 3,087 59.40
17 Others17 Others 64 1.2364 1.23
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla
Perpus
takaa
n
9 Tembakau beruang, tembakau gorilla
(inex, XTC, cece, happyfive)
Perpus
takaa
n
(inex, XTC, cece, happyfive)
(Seed, Dex, Adderall, Dexamphetamine)
Perpus
takaa
n
(Seed, Dex, Adderall, Dexamphetamine)
12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas Perpus
takaa
n
12 Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas
Semi-Synthetics DrugPerpus
takaa
n
Semi-Synthetics Drug
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers,
BNN6 Substances inhaled continuously (aibon glue, gasoline, markers, 3,357 64.60
BNN3,357 64.60
31Prevalence Survey 2018
2.2.2. Distribution of Respondents According to Level of Education and Knowledge on Types of Drugs
In general, the highest respondents’ knowledge on types of drugs is potent drugs (77.42%) and addictive substances (77.92%). It occurs in respondents in the group of Junior High School, Senior High School, and University. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge is on natural drugs of 36.56% compared to psychotropic (66.25%), semi-synthetic drugs (64.73%), and synthetic drugs (64.56%). The same pattern and tendency happens in all level of education (Junior High School, Senior High School, and University).
Respondents in Junior High School has the highest knowledge on potent drugs of 72.51%. Respondents in Senior High School have the highest knowledge on addictive substances of 79.18%, while respondents in University have the highest knowledge on addictive subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of drugs acoording to level of education is natural drugs for Junior High School (27.8%), natural drugs for Senior High School (35.93%), and natural drugs for university (43.295). .
The data above shows that respondents in Senior High School and University have higher knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Junior High School. It can be seen from the higher proportion of respondents who have the knowledge on types of drugs. In other word, respondents in Junior High School have lower knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Senior High School and University. Thus, the higher level of education, the higher knowledge on types of drugs it has.
Perpus
takaa
n subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of
Perpus
takaa
n subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of drugs acoording to level of education is natural drugs for Junior High
Perpus
takaa
n drugs acoording to level of education is natural drugs for Junior High School (27.8%), natural drugs for Senior High School (35.93%), and
Perpus
takaa
n School (27.8%), natural drugs for Senior High School (35.93%), and natural drugs for university (43.295). .
Perpus
takaa
n natural drugs for university (43.295). .
The data above shows that respondents in Senior High School and
Perpus
takaa
n
The data above shows that respondents in Senior High School and University have higher knowledge on types of drugs than respondents
Perpus
takaa
n
University have higher knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Junior High School. It can be seen from the higher proportion of
Perpus
takaa
n
in Junior High School. It can be seen from the higher proportion of
Perpus
takaa
n
respondents who have the knowledge on types of drugs. In other word,
Perpus
takaa
n
respondents who have the knowledge on types of drugs. In other word, respondents in Junior High School have lower knowledge on types of Perp
ustak
aan
respondents in Junior High School have lower knowledge on types of drugs than respondents in Senior High School and University. Thus, the Perp
ustak
aan
drugs than respondents in Senior High School and University. Thus, the
BNNRespondents in Junior High School has the highest knowledge
BNNRespondents in Junior High School has the highest knowledge
on potent drugs of 72.51%. Respondents in Senior High School have
BNNon potent drugs of 72.51%. Respondents in Senior High School have the highest knowledge on addictive substances of 79.18%, while
BNNthe highest knowledge on addictive substances of 79.18%, while
BNNrespondents in University have the highest knowledge on addictive BNNrespondents in University have the highest knowledge on addictive subtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of BNNsubtances of 80.78%. Meanwhile, the lowest knowledge on types of
32 Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 4 Distribution of Respondents based on the Level of Education and
Knowledge on Types of Drugs (%)
2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types of Drugs and Province
Based on survey of respondents’ knowledge on drugs, potent drugs and addictive substances are types of drugs mostly known by respondents in all provinces as survey locations (13 provinces). Appendix 1 shows that these two types of drugs have the biggest proportion of respondents in each province, except South Sulawesi where most respondents know better semi-synthetich drugs of around 74.3%.
2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018
Based on the survey, in general the respondents’ knowledge on the
know the impact of drug abuse to health, except the impact of feeling stronger/energetic. The most known impact is that drugs can cause hallucination or imagination (77.6%), followed by depression, concentration at work and hallucination. The respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drugs which is least known is that drugs make the users feel stronger or more eenergetic (34.9%). It means that respondents less know that drugs can make the users stronger.
Type of drug Junior high Type of drug Junior high
school
Senior high
school
University TotalUniversity Total
Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42Potent drug 72.51 78.12 80.10 77.42
Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92Addictive substances 71.90 79.18 80.78 77.92
Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25Psychotropic 50.80 66.48 76.72 66.25
Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56Natural drugs 27.80 35.93 43.29 36.56
Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56Synthetics drugs 61.23 65.28 66.10 64.56
Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73Semi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73
Perpus
takaa
n Based on survey of respondents’ knowledge on drugs, potent
Perpus
takaa
n Based on survey of respondents’ knowledge on drugs, potent drugs and addictive substances are types of drugs mostly known
Perpus
takaa
n drugs and addictive substances are types of drugs mostly known by respondents in all provinces as survey locations (13 provinces).
Perpus
takaa
n by respondents in all provinces as survey locations (13 provinces).
shows that these two types of drugs have the biggest
Perpus
takaa
n
shows that these two types of drugs have the biggest proportion of respondents in each province, except South Sulawesi
Perpus
takaa
n
proportion of respondents in each province, except South Sulawesi where most respondents know better semi-synthetich drugs of around
Perpus
takaa
n
where most respondents know better semi-synthetich drugs of around
2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Perpus
takaa
n
2.2.4. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018Perp
ustak
aan
Impact of Drug Abuse to Health, 2018
BNNBNN
2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types BNN2.2.3. Distribution of Respondents According to Knowledge on Types BNN
BNNSemi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73
BNNSemi-synthetic drugs 57.50 66.83 67.53 64.73
33Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 5Distribution of Respondents Based on the Impact of Drug Abuse to
Health, 2018 (%)
2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students and University Students
The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High School, Senior High School, and University mostly know the impact of drug abuse to health namely hallucination. Besides hallucination, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse is depression, problem with concentration in studying, and dependency. Another drugs impact namely making stronger or energetic is less known than other impacts. Less than half of respondents or around 42% knows this impact. In other word, making drug users feeling stronger is not one of the drugs impacts.
Based on the level of education, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse to health in university is higher than respondents’ knowledge in Junior High School and Senior High School. From the survey, it can be seen that respondents with higher level of education have higher knowledge on the impact of drug abuse (see Graphic 6).
Impact to Health Yes No Don’t knowYes No Don’t knowYes No Don’t know
Causing depression 70.70 2.80 26.4070.70 2.80 26.4070.70 2.80 26.40
Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50Hallucination 77.60 0.90 21.50
Feeling stronger 34.90 16.80 48.3034.90 16.80 48.3034.90 16.80 48.30
Causing Addiction 69.60 1.80 28.5069.60 1.80 28.5069.60 1.80 28.50
Concentration at work 70.60 1.40 28.0070.60 1.40 28.0070.60 1.40 28.00
Perpus
takaa
n The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High
Perpus
takaa
n The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High
School, Senior High School, and University mostly know the impact
Perpus
takaa
n School, Senior High School, and University mostly know the impact of drug abuse to health namely hallucination. Besides hallucination,
Perpus
takaa
n of drug abuse to health namely hallucination. Besides hallucination, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse is depression,
Perpus
takaa
n respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse is depression, problem with concentration in studying, and dependency. Another
Perpus
takaa
n problem with concentration in studying, and dependency. Another drugs impact namely making stronger or energetic is less known than
Perpus
takaa
n
drugs impact namely making stronger or energetic is less known than other impacts. Less than half of respondents or around 42% knows this
Perpus
takaa
n
other impacts. Less than half of respondents or around 42% knows this impact. In other word, making drug users feeling stronger is not one of
Perpus
takaa
n
impact. In other word, making drug users feeling stronger is not one of the drugs impacts.
Perpus
takaa
n
the drugs impacts.
Based on the level of education, respondents’ knowledge on the Perpus
takaa
n
Based on the level of education, respondents’ knowledge on the impact of drug abuse to health in university is higher than respondents’
Perpus
takaa
n
impact of drug abuse to health in university is higher than respondents’
BNN2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among
BNN2.2.5. Knowledge on the Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among
The survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High BNNThe survey obtains data that respondents studying in Junior High
34 Prevalence Survey 2018
Graphic 6Knowledge on Impact of Drug Abuse to Health Among Students, 2018
2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students
Based on the data of survey to students respondents with the knowledge on social impact such as shunned, bullied, hostiled, and ostracized in the friendship, with friends from different school, with family, and people around the resident, it is known that concerning the knowledge of social impact on drug abuse, the majority of respondents know that the relation with society especially those in neighbourhood is in a problem of being shunned by the society. It is indicated that the highest average of survey on social impact shows 64.0% respondents choose this. Another impact highly known by respondents from the survey is being shunned in friendship of 60.9%. The next impact known by the majority of respondents is being ostracized by people in neighbourhood of 57.5%. Meanwhile, the least known social impact compared to other impacts is being bullied in the family of 28.5%.
Depression Hallucination Stronger or more
energetic
Causing
dependency
Breaking
concentration in
studying
67,0
0%
69,9
0%
74,1
0%
70,7
0%
71,1
0% 77,8
0%
81,9
0%
77,6
0%
23,9
0% 34,7
0% 42,7
0%
34,9
0%
56,3
0%
69,1
0% 79,4
0%
69,6
0%
64,9
0%
70,6
0%
70,6
0%
74,7
0%
TOTALPTSMASMP
Junior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University TotalJunior High School Senior High School University Total
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse
Perpus
takaa
n 2.2.6. Distribution of Knowledge on the Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among Students and University Students
Perpus
takaa
n Among Students and University Students
Based on the data of survey to students respondents with the
Perpus
takaa
n
Based on the data of survey to students respondents with the knowledge on social impact such as shunned, bullied, hostiled, and
Perpus
takaa
n
knowledge on social impact such as shunned, bullied, hostiled, and ostracized in the friendship, with friends from different school, with
Perpus
takaa
n
ostracized in the friendship, with friends from different school, with family, and people around the resident, it is known that concerning the
Perpus
takaa
n
family, and people around the resident, it is known that concerning the knowledge of social impact on drug abuse, the majority of respondents Perp
ustak
aan
knowledge of social impact on drug abuse, the majority of respondents know that the relation with society especially those in neighbourhood Perp
ustak
aan
know that the relation with society especially those in neighbourhood
BNNBNNBNNBNNCausing
BNNCausing
dependency
BNNdependency
BNN
35Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 6Distribution of Knowledge to Social Impact of Drug Abuse Among
Students and University Students, 2018 (%)
2.2.7. Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues due to Drug Abuse
Based on the survey, student respondents state that almost all issues may occur due to drug abuse. Adding the burden to family shows the highest percentage of 79.4%, followed by spending the saving of 78.1%. Immoral action is the least issue known by respondents as the
Social Impact Junior High Social Impact Junior High
School
Senior High
School
University TotalUniversity Total
Friendship
a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90a. Shunned 60.90 59.00 62.90 60.90
b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90b. Bullied 36.30 35.40 38.80 36.90
c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30c. Hostile 45.20 40.40 42.30 42.30
d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80d. Ostracized 46.90 47.60 51.40 48.80
Different school friends relationship
a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60
b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30
c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20
d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20
Relationship with family
a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60
b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50
c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90
d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30
Social relationship in the neighbourhood
a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00
b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30
c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80
d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50d. Ostracized 54.50 56.20 60.90 57.50
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20
Perpus
takaa
n d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20
a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60
Perpus
takaa
n a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60
Perpus
takaa
n a. Shunned 49.40 44.40 46.90 46.60
b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50
Perpus
takaa
n b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50
Perpus
takaa
n b. Bullied 24.80 27.70 31.70 28.50
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90
Perpus
takaa
n
c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90
Perpus
takaa
n
c. Hostile 32.20 31.90 34.30 32.90
d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30
Perpus
takaa
n
d. Ostracized 42.70 42.20 44.80 43.30
Social relationship in the neighbourhood
Perpus
takaa
n
Social relationship in the neighbourhood
a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00
Perpus
takaa
n
a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00
Perpus
takaa
n
a. Shunned 63.10 62.00 66.60 64.00
b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30Perpus
takaa
n
b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30Perpus
takaa
n
b. Bullied 37.80 40.20 47.70 42.30
c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80Perp
ustak
aan
c. Hostile 46.20 46.60 50.30 47.80
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNa. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60
BNNa. Shunned 53.90 44.40 46.90 46.60
b. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30
BNNb. Bullied 33.80 34.00 35.10 34.30
c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20BNNc. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20BNNc. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20c. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20BNNc. Hostile 32.20 37.50 36.50 38.20
d. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20BNNd. Ostracized 42.90 42.90 43.70 43.20
36 Prevalence Survey 2018
impact of drug abuse with 69% (see Appendix 2). This data shows that students’ knowledge on the issues of drug abuse is adequate. Students know well the impact of drug abuse.
2.2.8 Attitude Toward Drug Abuse
Respondents with Junior High School background are asked about their response on a case where their school friend is trading drugs. Most of them will report to school (41.00%) or report to police (36.40%). Those who choose to give advice are only around 15.70%. (See Appendix 3)
The attitude when being offered to buy drugs is mostly rejecting (98.305). Almost no respondents answer ‘accepting”. Respondents with doubtful answer are only 1.60%. This pattern of answer also occurs in respondents in the education level of Junior High School, Senior High School and University.
In the case of having school friend which uses drug, more than half of Junior High School students (55.105) will report to the police. Some wil give advice (20.30%) and prohibit (16.60%). Only few will keep silent.
2.3. Drug Abuse and Influencing Factors
2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University Students
Overall, the prevalence rate among current users-students and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492 people. The prevalence rate of Senior High School students as ever used is the highest compared to Junior High School students and University students. In Senior High School, the prevalence rate is 6.40% (for ever used-respondents) and 3.60% (for current users-respondents).
The prevalence rate of Senior High School students is the highest compared to Junior High School students and university students. The prevalence rate of ever used-university students is below the
Perpus
takaa
n In the case of having school friend which uses drug, more than half
Perpus
takaa
n In the case of having school friend which uses drug, more than half
of Junior High School students (55.105) will report to the police. Some
Perpus
takaa
n of Junior High School students (55.105) will report to the police. Some wil give advice (20.30%) and prohibit (16.60%). Only few will keep silent.
Perpus
takaa
n wil give advice (20.30%) and prohibit (16.60%). Only few will keep silent.
2.3. Drug Abuse and Influencing Factors
Perpus
takaa
n
2.3. Drug Abuse and Influencing Factors
2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University
Perpus
takaa
n
2.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use Among Students and University Students Perp
ustak
aan
Students
BNNThe attitude when being offered to buy drugs is mostly rejecting
BNNThe attitude when being offered to buy drugs is mostly rejecting
(98.305). Almost no respondents answer ‘accepting”. Respondents with
BNN(98.305). Almost no respondents answer ‘accepting”. Respondents with doubtful answer are only 1.60%. This pattern of answer also occurs in
BNNdoubtful answer are only 1.60%. This pattern of answer also occurs in respondents in the education level of Junior High School, Senior High BNNrespondents in the education level of Junior High School, Senior High
37Prevalence Survey 2018
prevalence rate of Senior High School students with 6.00% followed by the prevalence rate of Junior High School students with 3.30%. Meanwhile, the prevalence rate of drug abuse in university student in the last one year is 2.80%.
Table 7Prevalence Rate of Ever Used and Current User
Among Students and University Students Acoording to the Level of Education (%)
The prevalence rate of drug abuse in Junior High School students is almost equal of 3.40% in male students and 3.20% in female students. Hence, current users among Junior High School students are equal in gender. The thing that differentiates is the use of drugs among Senior High School students and university students which is dominated by male students.
Table 8Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students
According to the Level of Education and Gender
Ever used Current User
N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %
Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%Junior High School 63 4.80% 43 3.30%
Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%
University 113 6.00% 53 2.80%113 6.00% 53 2.80%113 6.00% 53 2.80%113 6.00% 53 2.80%
Total 303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%
Male Female
N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %
Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20Junior High School 20 3.40 23 3.20
Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30Senior High School 47 5.00 24 2.30
University 39 4.30 14 1.4039 4.30 14 1.4039 4.30 14 1.4039 4.30 14 1.40
Total 106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20106 4.30 61 2.20
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n The prevalence rate of drug abuse in Junior High School students
Perpus
takaa
n The prevalence rate of drug abuse in Junior High School students
is almost equal of 3.40% in male students and 3.20% in female students.
Perpus
takaa
n is almost equal of 3.40% in male students and 3.20% in female students. Hence, current users among Junior High School students are equal in
Perpus
takaa
n Hence, current users among Junior High School students are equal in gender. The thing that differentiates is the use of drugs among Senior
Perpus
takaa
n
gender. The thing that differentiates is the use of drugs among Senior High School students and university students which is dominated by
Perpus
takaa
n
High School students and university students which is dominated by
Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students Perpus
takaa
n
Prevalence Rate of Current User Among Students and University Students
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
Senior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%
BNNSenior High School 127 6.40% 71 3.60%
113 6.00% 53 2.80%
BNN113 6.00% 53 2.80%
303 5.80% 167 3.20%
BNN303 5.80% 167 3.20%303 5.80% 167 3.20%
BNN303 5.80% 167 3.20%
38 Prevalence Survey 2018
The survey among Junior and Senior High School students and University students shows that in the last one year, they consume drugs as an experiment or a trial (1.40%) with the highest reason compared to as a regular use (0.44%) and addiction (0.175). Meanwhile, students and university student respondents which use injected drugs are very low (0.06%).
Table 9Current Use of Drugs According to the Status of Usage
The survey shows that the reason to try is very dominant (64.00%) among students and university students as ever used and current users, followed by the reason for having fun (16.80%). Being persuaded or forced by a friend is also a reason with quite high percentage of 6.60%. Why do student and university students use drugs? This group of
by friends. Meanwhile, the factor of personal stress among students and university students shows the smallest percentage (5.605) among the four biggest reasons to use drugs in students and university student.
Status of Usage N %N %
Experiment 73 1.4073 1.40
Regular 23 0.4423 0.44
Addicted 9 0.179 0.17
Injected drug 3 0.063 0.06
Perpus
takaa
n The survey shows that the reason to try is very dominant (64.00%)
Perpus
takaa
n The survey shows that the reason to try is very dominant (64.00%) among students and university students as ever used and current
Perpus
takaa
n among students and university students as ever used and current users, followed by the reason for having fun (16.80%). Being persuaded
Perpus
takaa
n users, followed by the reason for having fun (16.80%). Being persuaded or forced by a friend is also a reason with quite high percentage of
Perpus
takaa
n
or forced by a friend is also a reason with quite high percentage of 6.60%. Why do student and university students use drugs? This group of
Perpus
takaa
n
6.60%. Why do student and university students use drugs? This group of
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
by friends. Meanwhile, the factor of personal stress among students
Perpus
takaa
n
by friends. Meanwhile, the factor of personal stress among students and university students shows the smallest percentage (5.605) among
Perpus
takaa
n
and university students shows the smallest percentage (5.605) among the four biggest reasons to use drugs in students and university student. Perp
ustak
aan
the four biggest reasons to use drugs in students and university student.
BNNBNN
9 0.17
BNN9 0.17
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN3 0.06
BNN3 0.06
39Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 10Reasons of Using Drugs
From the result of survey in table 11, less Junior High School students consumes drugs. The Junior High School students tend to use non drugs-addictive substances. Meanwhile, Senior High School and University students consume both drugs and non drugs-addictive substances. Students in Senior High School consume more varied hazardous drugs, both drugs and non-drugs addictive substances than University students. The detail use of drugs and other addictive substances can be seen in the following table.
Reasons N %N %
Experiment 194 64.00194 64.00
Having fun 51 16.8051 16.80
Forced by friends 20 6.6020 6.60
Forced by boyfriend/girlfriend 1 0.301 0.30
Stressed due to family problem 6 2.006 2.00
Stressed due to personal problem 17 5.6017 5.60
Stressed due to job 1 0.301 0.30
Being set up 7 2.307 2.30
Others 6 2.00
Total 303 100.00303 100.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n From the result of survey in table 11, less Junior High School
Perpus
takaa
n From the result of survey in table 11, less Junior High School
students consumes drugs. The Junior High School students tend to
Perpus
takaa
n students consumes drugs. The Junior High School students tend to use non drugs-addictive substances. Meanwhile, Senior High School
Perpus
takaa
n use non drugs-addictive substances. Meanwhile, Senior High School and University students consume both drugs and non drugs-addictive
Perpus
takaa
n
and University students consume both drugs and non drugs-addictive substances. Students in Senior High School consume more varied
Perpus
takaa
n
substances. Students in Senior High School consume more varied hazardous drugs, both drugs and non-drugs addictive substances
Perpus
takaa
n
hazardous drugs, both drugs and non-drugs addictive substances than University students. The detail use of drugs and other addictive
Perpus
takaa
n
than University students. The detail use of drugs and other addictive substances can be seen in the following table. Perp
ustak
aan
substances can be seen in the following table.
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
7 2.30
BNN7 2.307 2.30
BNN7 2.30
6 2.00
BNN6 2.006 2.00
BNN6 2.00
303 100.00BNN303 100.00303 100.00BNN303 100.00
40 Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 11Types of Drugs Consumed in the Past Year
Type of drug and other addic-
tive substances
Junior high
school
Senior
high
school
University TotalUniversity Total
N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %
Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00Dextromethorpan overly consumed 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.8 5 3.00
Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80Tramadol 1 2.30 4 5.60 3 5.70 8 4.80
Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00Trihexiphenidyl 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00
Headache medicine overly
consumed
4 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.604 9.30 14 19.70 8 15.10 26 15.60
Headache medicine mixed with
drinking soda
3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60
Substances inhaled continuously
(glue, gasoline, markers, electric
mosquito,etc. )
12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80
Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40
Marijuana 0Marijuana 0 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60
Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00
Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Amphetamine (seed, dex Adderall,
dexamphetamine)
0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60
Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00
Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Heroin 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40Cocaine 0 0.00 3 4.20 1 1.90 4 2.40
2.3.2 Prevalence Rate per Province
From the use of drugs and other addictive substances in the past one year, cities like Surabaya, Samarinda, Bandung, Jakarta and Yogyakarta are the cities with the highest prevalence rate of drugs and non drugs-addictive substances abuse compared to other cites.
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40
Perpus
takaa
n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40
Perpus
takaa
n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40
Perpus
takaa
n Koplo pill, BK, mboat, mboti, roda 1 2.30 3 4.20 0 0.00 4 2.40
0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60
Perpus
takaa
n 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60
Perpus
takaa
n 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.600.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60
Perpus
takaa
n 0.00 8 11.30 8 15.10 16 9.60
Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0
Perpus
takaa
n Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00
Perpus
takaa
n 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.000.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00
Perpus
takaa
n 0.00 3 4.20 2 3.80 5 3.00
Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Perpus
takaa
n
Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Perpus
takaa
n
Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Perpus
takaa
n
Ecstasy 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Amphetamine (seed, dex Adderall,
Perpus
takaa
n
Amphetamine (seed, dex Adderall, 0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60
Perpus
takaa
n
0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.600 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60
Perpus
takaa
n
0 0.00 1 1.40 0 0.00 1 0.60
Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Methaphetamine 0 0.00 4 5.60 1 1.90 5 3.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Perpus
takaa
n
Putau 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80Perp
ustak
aan
Morphine 0 0.00 3 4.20 0 0.00 3 1.80
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60
BNN3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.603 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60
BNN3 7.00 6 8.50 2 3.80 11 6.60
12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80
BNN12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80
BNN12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.8012 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80
BNN12 27.90 9 12.70 2 3.80 23 13.80
41Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 12Prevalence Rate in Past Year According to the Level of Education
Per Capital City of Province
Meanwhile, based on drugs dependency rate (ever used, regular and addiction), the highest prevalence rate among students and university students as current users are in Surabaya with ever used (4.5%), regular (2.0%), and addiction (1.0%).
City
Junior high
school
Senior high
schoolCollege TotalCollege Total
N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %N % N % N % N %
Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50Banda Aceh 1 1.00 5 3.30 4 2.70 10 2.50
Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50Medan 5 5.00 2 1.30 3 2.00 10 2.50
Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30Palembang 3 2.90 5 3.40 1 0.70 9 2.30
Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50Batam 1 1.00 4 2.50 5 3.60 10 2.50
Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00Jakarta 2 2.00 11 6.30 3 2.40 16 4.00
Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50
Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50
Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80
Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30
Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30
Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30
Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50
Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30
Perpus
takaa
n Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30
Perpus
takaa
n Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30
Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30
Perpus
takaa
n Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30
Perpus
takaa
n Samarinda 5 5.00 8 5.20 8 5.40 21 5.30
Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30
Perpus
takaa
n Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30
Perpus
takaa
n Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30
Perpus
takaa
n Pontianak 1 1.00 3 2.00 1 0.70 5 1.30
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50
Perpus
takaa
n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50
Perpus
takaa
n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50
Perpus
takaa
n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50
Perpus
takaa
n Makassar 1 1.00 5 3.30 8 5.40 14 3.50
Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Jayapura 2 2.00 2 1.40 4 2.70 8 2.00
Perpus
takaa
n
Meanwhile, based on drugs dependency rate (ever used, regular
Perpus
takaa
n
Meanwhile, based on drugs dependency rate (ever used, regular and addiction), the highest prevalence rate among students and Perp
ustak
aan
and addiction), the highest prevalence rate among students and university students as current users are in Surabaya with ever used Perp
ustak
aan
university students as current users are in Surabaya with ever used (4.5%), regular (2.0%), and addiction (1.0%).
Perpus
takaa
n
(4.5%), regular (2.0%), and addiction (1.0%).Perp
ustak
aan B
NNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50
BNNBandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50Bandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50
BNNBandung 7 6.90 5 3.40 6 4.00 18 4.50
Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50
BNNSurabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50
BNNSurabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50Surabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50
BNNSurabaya 8 7.60 14 9.40 8 5.50 30 7.50
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80BNNYogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80BNNYogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80Yogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80BNNYogyakarta 7 6.90 7 4.70 1 0.70 15 3.80
Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30BNNDenpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30Denpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30BNNDenpasar 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.70 1 0.30
42 Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 13Prevalence Rate of Past Year
According to the Status of Usage in 13 Capital Cities of the Province
2.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse
The risky behaviour toward drugs abuse is the activity among students and university students with the frequency and intensity that may create vulnerability on drugs use.
Students and university students with drinking alcohol experience is about 26.7%. This percentage has experienced being drunk because of alcohol. Based on the level of education, drinking alcohol was experienced by 21.6% of Junior High School students, 29.6% of Senior High School students, and 25.9% of University students.
The second-quite prominent risky behaviour among students and university students is the habit of smoking reaching 12.3% in Junior
Cities Experimental Cities Experimental
use
Regular Addicted Injected Regular Addicted Injected Regular Addicted Injected
drug use
Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -Banda Aceh 1,00% 0,75% 0,75% -
Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -Medan 2,00% 0,25% 0,25% -
Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Palembang 1,25% 0,50% 0,50% -
Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%Batam 1,50% 0,75% - 0,25%
DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -DKI Jakarta 2,25% 1,75% - -
Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Bandung 3,50% 0,75% 0,25% -
Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -
Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -
Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -Denpasar - - 0,25% -
Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -
Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -
Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -
Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -
Perpus
takaa
n Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -
Perpus
takaa
n Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -
Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -
Perpus
takaa
n Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -
Perpus
takaa
n Pontianak 0,25% 0,50% 0,50% -
Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -
Perpus
takaa
n Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -
Perpus
takaa
n Makassar 2,50% 0,75% 0,25% -
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
2.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse
Perpus
takaa
n
2.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse
The risky behaviour toward drugs abuse is the activity among Perpus
takaa
n
The risky behaviour toward drugs abuse is the activity among
Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%
Perpus
takaa
n Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%
Perpus
takaa
n Jayapura 1,50% 0,25% - 0,25%
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNSurabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -
BNNSurabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -Surabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -
BNNSurabaya 4,50% 2,00% 1,00% -
Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -
BNNYogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -Yogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -
BNNYogyakarta 2,00% 1,50% 0,25% -
Denpasar - - 0,25% -BNNDenpasar - - 0,25% -
Samarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -BNNSamarinda 4,25% 0,75% 0,25% -
43Prevalence Survey 2018
High School, 22.2% in Senior High School, and 24.4% in University. Generally, respondents admitted that they started smoking at the age of 14. The next risky behaviour among students and university students is smoking with vaping and visiting nightclubs. Smoking with vaping is known among 10.4% of Junior High School students and 12.8% of Senior High School students. They mostly confessed having vaping in the age of 16. Smoking with vaping is not popular among university students. Visiting nightclubs becomes a risky behaviour towatd drug abuse (15.8%).
2.3.4. Source of Obtaining Drugs (Source, Level of Ease)
Students and university students obtain drugs from being offered (17.9%) and by buying (17.9%) from hang out friends. They also obtain drugs from being offered by a friend (10.6%) and by buying from school/
there are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less respondents admit on it. They are marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hemp leaf [linda]), and bear tobacco or gorilla tobacco.
2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently and Years before)
Students and university students realize that drug use is not for medication, but for enjoying its impact since it is mostly started with trial, being offered, or buying from hang out friends. Since drug substances are addictive, there is the potential of addiction even in excessive amount, regularly and long enough that may cause health, phisycal, mental and social disorder. From the previous surveys, drug
not easy to prevent drug use especially among students and university students. Graphic 7 shows that the trend of drug use among students and university students from 2006, 2009 and 2011 was declining from 8.1% (2006), 7.8% (2009), and 4.3% (2011). However, the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2011 was higher than in 2016. The prevalence rate of drug abuse increased into 6.4% in 2016 and declined into 5.8% in 2018.
Perpus
takaa
n there are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less
Perpus
takaa
n there are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less respondents admit on it. They are marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana,
Perpus
takaa
n respondents admit on it. They are marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hemp leaf [linda]), and bear tobacco or gorilla tobacco.
Perpus
takaa
n getok, hemp leaf [linda]), and bear tobacco or gorilla tobacco.
2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently
Perpus
takaa
n 2.3.5 Trend of Drug Use (Comparing the Use of Drugs Currently and Years before)
Perpus
takaa
n
and Years before)
Students and university students realize that drug use is not
Perpus
takaa
n
Students and university students realize that drug use is not for medication, but for enjoying its impact since it is mostly started
Perpus
takaa
n
for medication, but for enjoying its impact since it is mostly started with trial, being offered, or buying from hang out friends. Since drug Perp
ustak
aan
with trial, being offered, or buying from hang out friends. Since drug substances are addictive, there is the potential of addiction even in Perp
ustak
aan
substances are addictive, there is the potential of addiction even in
BNNStudents and university students obtain drugs from being offered
BNNStudents and university students obtain drugs from being offered
(17.9%) and by buying (17.9%) from hang out friends. They also obtain
BNN(17.9%) and by buying (17.9%) from hang out friends. They also obtain drugs from being offered by a friend (10.6%) and by buying from school/
BNNdrugs from being offered by a friend (10.6%) and by buying from school/
BNNthere are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less BNNthere are two types of drugs that are easiest to get despite that less
44 Prevalence Survey 2018
Based on gender, the prevalence rate of drug abuse among male and female was declining in 2011 and increasing in 2016 compared to in 2018. The prevalence rate is increasing respectably among female students and university students.
Graphic 7Comparison of Prevalence Rate Among Students and University Students
According to Gender
Compared to prevalence rate of druig abuse in the past year among students and university students, there has been a difference. The tendency to use drugs among students and university students in total from 2006 to 2016 was declining from 5.2% (2006), 5.1% (2009), 2.9% (2011) and 1.9% (2016). The prevalence rate according to gender shows that prevalence rate of drug abuse both among male and female students and university students was declining from 2011 to 2016. However, compared to the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018, the prevalence rate was increasing both in total and between male and female. The detail prevalence rate is shown in Graphic 8.
Graphic 8Graphic of Prevalence Rate Comparison among Drug User Students and
University Students in the Past Year According to Gender
Male Female TotalTotalTotal
9,19,19,1
7,5
4,84,8 3,54,35,25,2
5,15,15,1
2,92,93,21,91,9 2,8
1,31,31,3 0,60,60,62,2
1,91,91,9
2006 2009 2011 2016 2018
Male Female
15
10
5
0
13,713,7
11,3
7,17,1 6,46,47,88,18,1
7,87,87,8
4,34,35,8
3,33,3 4,74,7
1,91,91,9 1,61,61,64,1
20062009
2011 2016
6,4
2018
Perpus
takaa
n Compared to prevalence rate of druig abuse in the past year among
Perpus
takaa
n Compared to prevalence rate of druig abuse in the past year among students and university students, there has been a difference. The
Perpus
takaa
n students and university students, there has been a difference. The tendency to use drugs among students and university students in total
Perpus
takaa
n tendency to use drugs among students and university students in total from 2006 to 2016 was declining from 5.2% (2006), 5.1% (2009), 2.9%
Perpus
takaa
n from 2006 to 2016 was declining from 5.2% (2006), 5.1% (2009), 2.9% (2011) and 1.9% (2016). The prevalence rate according to gender shows
Perpus
takaa
n
(2011) and 1.9% (2016). The prevalence rate according to gender shows that prevalence rate of drug abuse both among male and female students
Perpus
takaa
n
that prevalence rate of drug abuse both among male and female students and university students was declining from 2011 to 2016. However,
Perpus
takaa
n
and university students was declining from 2011 to 2016. However, compared to the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018, the prevalence
Perpus
takaa
n
compared to the prevalence rate of drug abuse in 2018, the prevalence rate was increasing both in total and between male and female. The detail
Perpus
takaa
n
rate was increasing both in total and between male and female. The detail prevalence rate is shown in Graphic 8.Perp
ustak
aan
prevalence rate is shown in Graphic 8.
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNTotal
BNNTotalTotal
BNNTotalTotal
BNNTotal
BNN
45
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG WORKERS
III
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE
Perpus
takaa
n SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEAMONG WORKERS
Perpus
takaa
n AMONG WORKERS
BNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSEBNNSURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE
46
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
47Prevalence Survey 2018
SURVEY ON DRUG ABUSE AMONG WORKERS
3.1. Characteristics of Respondents Among Workers
The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces is 5,200 workers, consisting of 3,066 male workers (59.0%) and 2,134 female workers (41%). The result of reaserach survey on drug abuse in 13 provinces in Indonesia shows that more than half of respondents (51%) are married and 47.2% are not married.
Table 14 Distribution of Respondents According to Profession Sector
Professional sector N % N %
1 Agriculture1 Agriculture 0.0%
2 Mine dan excavation2 Mine dan excavation 60 1.2%60 1.2%
3 Industry of proces3 Industry of proces 463 8.9%463 8.9%
4 electricity, gas, water4 electricity, gas, water 40 0.8%40 0.8%
5 construction5 construction 640 12.3%640 12.3%
6 commerce, restaurant dan hotel6 commerce, restaurant dan hotel 2,411 46.4%2,411 46.4%
7 transportation, warehousesing, communication7 transportation, warehousesing, communication 460 8.8%460 8.8%
8 finance, real estate, rental dan service company8 finance, real estate, rental dan service company 140 2.7%140 2.7%
9 Social service/ private social9 Social service/ private social 986 19.0%986 19.0%
Total 5,200 100% 5,200 100%
III
Perpus
takaa
n The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces
Perpus
takaa
n The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces is 5,200 workers, consisting of 3,066 male workers (59.0%) and 2,134
Perpus
takaa
n is 5,200 workers, consisting of 3,066 male workers (59.0%) and 2,134 female workers (41%). The result of reaserach survey on drug abuse in
Perpus
takaa
n female workers (41%). The result of reaserach survey on drug abuse in 13 provinces in Indonesia shows that more than half of respondents
Perpus
takaa
n 13 provinces in Indonesia shows that more than half of respondents (51%) are married and 47.2% are not married.
Perpus
takaa
n (51%) are married and 47.2% are not married.
Table 14
Perpus
takaa
n
Table 14 Distribution of Respondents According to Profession Sector
Perpus
takaa
n
Distribution of Respondents According to Profession Sector
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Professional sector
Perpus
takaa
n
Professional sector
1 Agriculture Perpus
takaa
n
1 Agriculture
2 Mine dan excavationPerpus
takaa
n
2 Mine dan excavation
BNN3.1. Characteristics of Respondents Among Workers
BNN3.1. Characteristics of Respondents Among Workers
The total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces BNNThe total number of respondents in the capital city of 13 provinces
48 Prevalence Survey 2018
3.2. Knowledge and Attitude on the Danger of Drugs Among Workers
3.2.1. Knowledge on Drugs Among Workers
Worker respondents’ knowledge on the types of drugs is varied. Basically, there are six groups of drugs type known by respondents, such as potent drug, addictive substances, psychotropic,natural drugs, synthetic drugs, and semi-synthetic drugs.
Semi-synthetic drugs are quite well known by most respondents, such as heroine (57.5%) and cocaine (53.7%). Meanwhile, morphine and putaw including etep and pete are also known by respondents reaching 45.2% and 43.4% from the total respondents (Table 15).
Worker respondents also know types of potent drug which have the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-potent medicine can cause tremendous effect when consumed excessively. Around 31.0% respondents know that headache medine when mixed with soda may cause drugs effect also. Meanwhile, psychotropic drug mostly known by workers is koplo pill of around 39.1%.
Perpus
takaa
n the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-
Perpus
takaa
n the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-
Perpus
takaa
n potent medicine can cause tremendous effect when consumed
Perpus
takaa
n potent medicine can cause tremendous effect when consumed excessively. Around 31.0% respondents know that headache medine
Perpus
takaa
n excessively. Around 31.0% respondents know that headache medine when mixed with soda may cause drugs effect also. Meanwhile,
Perpus
takaa
n when mixed with soda may cause drugs effect also. Meanwhile, psychotropic drug mostly known by workers is koplo pill of around
Perpus
takaa
n psychotropic drug mostly known by workers is koplo pill of around
BNNand putaw including etep and pete are also known by respondents
BNNand putaw including etep and pete are also known by respondents reaching 45.2% and 43.4% from the total respondents (Table 15).
BNNreaching 45.2% and 43.4% from the total respondents (Table 15).
Worker respondents also know types of potent drug which have BNNWorker respondents also know types of potent drug which have
the effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-BNNthe effect as drugs. Most respondents (31.5%) know that headache-
49Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 15 Respondents’ Knowledge on Types of Drugs
Respondents also know other impacts of drug abuse in three
relatives, and society (see Appendix 4). More than half of respondents
Types of drug N %N %
Potent medicine
1 Dextromethorphan overly consumed 1 Dextromethorphan overly consumed 1,278 24.6%1,278 24.6%
2 Tramadol2 Tramadol 1,068 20.5%1,068 20.5%
3 Trihexyphenidyl3 Trihexyphenidyl 887 17.1%887 17.1%
4 Medicine for headache overly consumed4 Medicine for headache overly consumed 1,640 31.5%1,640 31.5%
5 Medicine for headache that’s mixed with drinking soda5 Medicine for headache that’s mixed with drinking soda 1,610 31.0%1,610 31.0%
Addictive substances
6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers, 6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers,
electric mosquito, etc
2,436 46,8%2,436 46,8%
Psychotropics
7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda7 Koplo pill, BK, Mboat, Mboti, roda 2,436 46,8%2,436 46,8%
Natural drug
8 Marijuana8 Marijuana 3,572 68.7%3,572 68.7%
Synthetics drug
9 Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco9 Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 1,911 36.8%1,911 36.8%
10 Ecstasy 2,912 56.0%2,912 56.0%
11 Amphetamine (seed, dex, addrall, dexamphetamine) 1.123 21.6%1.123 21.6%
12 Methamphetamine 3,431 66.0%3,431 66.0%
Semi-synthetics drug
13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin) 2.255 43.4%2.255 43.4%
14 Morphine14 Morphine 2,348 45.2%2,348 45.2%
15 Heroin15 Heroin 2,992 57.5%2,992 57.5%
16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%16 Cocaine 2,790 53.7%
17 Others17 Others 64 1.23%64 1.23%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Amphetamine (seed, dex, addrall, dexamphetamine)
Perpus
takaa
n
Amphetamine (seed, dex, addrall, dexamphetamine)
Methamphetamine
Perpus
takaa
n
Methamphetamine
Semi-synthetics drugPerpus
takaa
n
Semi-synthetics drug
13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)Perpus
takaa
n
13 Putau (the lowest grade of heroin)
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers,
BNN6 Substances inhaled continuously (glue aibon, gasoline, markers,
50 Prevalence Survey 2018
(51.3%) acknolwdges the social impact of drug abuse such as being
also ostracized from the community when being caught of using drugs. The percentage reaches 37.9%.
3.2.2. Attitude Toward Drug Abuse
Attitude is a representation of what someone will do in facing a situation related to drug abuse. This research shows that more than one third of respondents (38.6%) has the viewpoint and will give an
one fourth of respondents (28.2%) will report it to the police, while
will keep silent.
Table 16
The respondents’ knowledge and attitude is varied when knowing that their friend and family are involved in drug abuse. This research shows that almost half of respondents (45.5%) will expressly prohibit when their parents are involved in drug abuse. Furthermore, almost half of respondents (48.9%) will strictly prohibit if their spouse, husband or wife, is involved in drug abuse (Table 17).
WHAT’S IS YOUR RESPONSE IF YOUR OFFICE MATE INVOLVED IN
DRUGS DEALING
N %N %
Keep silent 344 6.6%Keep silent 344 6.6%Keep silent 344 6.6%Keep silent 344 6.6%
Advise them 2,009 38.6%Advise them 2,009 38.6%Advise them 2,009 38.6%
Forbid them 1,287 24%Forbid them 1,287 24%Forbid them 1,287 24%
Report them to the police 1,468 28%Report them to the police 1,468 28%Report them to the police 1,468 28%
Others 92 1.8%Others 92 1.8%Others 92 1.8%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n WHAT’S IS YOUR RESPONSE IF YOUR OFFICE MATE INVOLVED IN
Perpus
takaa
n WHAT’S IS YOUR RESPONSE IF YOUR OFFICE MATE INVOLVED IN
DRUGS DEALING
Perpus
takaa
n DRUGS DEALING
Keep silent 344 6.6%
Perpus
takaa
n Keep silent 344 6.6%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Advise them 2,009 38.6%
Perpus
takaa
n
Advise them 2,009 38.6%
Forbid them 1,287 24%
Perpus
takaa
n
Forbid them 1,287 24%
Report them to the police 1,468 28%
Perpus
takaa
n
Report them to the police 1,468 28%
Others 92 1.8%
Perpus
takaa
n
Others 92 1.8%
BNNBNNBNN
51Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 17Respondents’ Attitude When Friends or Family Members Use Drugs
3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers
The prevalence rate of drug use in the past year among workers in 13 capitals of the provinces in 2018 was 2.10% or equivalent to 1,514,037 workers. Table 18 below shows that male workers have higher prevalence rate compared to female workers of 2.7%.
Table 18Prevalence of Ever Use and Current User
Attitude
If respondents have
Office
mate
using
drugs
Relatives
using drugs
Parents
using
drugs
Boyfriend/
Girlfriend
Your
couple
using
drugs
Keep silent 7.1% 2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%2.2% 1.3% 1.0% 0.9%
Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%Advise them 43.7% 39.7% 32.5% 25.2% 25.3%
Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%Forbid them 22.5% 37.0% 45.5% 45.0% 48.9%
Report to the
police
24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%24.5% 19.3% 18.6% 22.5% 20.2%
Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%
GENDER EVER USED DRUGGENDER EVER USED DRUG CURRENT USE
Male 199 6.50% 84 2.70%199 6.50% 84 2.70%199 6.50% 84 2.70%199 6.50% 84 2.70%
Female 49 2.30% 24 1.10%49 2.30% 24 1.10%49 2.30% 24 1.10%49 2.30% 24 1.10%
Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%248 4.80% 108 2.10%248 4.80% 108 2.10%248 4.80% 108 2.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers
Perpus
takaa
n 3.3.1. Prevalence Rate of Drug Use among Workers
The prevalence rate of drug use in the past year among workers
Perpus
takaa
n
The prevalence rate of drug use in the past year among workers in 13 capitals of the provinces in 2018 was
Perpus
takaa
n
in 13 capitals of the provinces in 2018 was 1,514,037 workers.
Perpus
takaa
n
1,514,037 workers. Table 18 below shows that male workers have
Perpus
takaa
n
Table 18 below shows that male workers have higher prevalence rate compared to female workers of 2.7%.
Perpus
takaa
n
higher prevalence rate compared to female workers of 2.7%.
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNOthers 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%
BNNOthers 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%Others 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%
BNNOthers 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 6.4% 4.6%
52 Prevalence Survey 2018
Based on prevalence of drug use among workers in the past year (current users), this survey tries to further study the prevalence according to age, level of education, marital status and residence. Table 19 shows that the prevalence of drug use among male workers
43 workers (2.70%) under 30 years old and 41 workers (2.80%) over 30 years old.
Table 19Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Gender
CURRENT USE
Group of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCEGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCEGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE
Male Female Male FemaleMale Female Male FemaleMale Female Male FemaleMale Female Male Female
GROUP OF AGE
<30 43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%
30 + 41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%41 10 2.80% 1.40%
EDUCATIONAL LEVEL
Junior high school and under 8 2 4.00% 2.90%8 2 4.00% 2.90%8 2 4.00% 2.90%8 2 4.00% 2.90%
Senior high school 42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%42 9 2.60% 0.90%
Diploma degree 34 13 2.80% 1.30%34 13 2.80% 1.30%34 13 2.80% 1.30%34 13 2.80% 1.30%
MARITAL STATUS
Not married 40 10 3.00% 0.90%40 10 3.00% 0.90%40 10 3.00% 0.90%40 10 3.00% 0.90%
Menikah 44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%44 9 2.60% 1.00%
Divorce (live) 0 5 0.00% 12.80%0 5 0.00% 12.80%0 5 0.00% 12.80%0 5 0.00% 12.80%
Divorce (die) 0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%0 0 0.00% 0.00%
RESIDENCE
Own house 20 5 2.10% 1.00%20 5 2.10% 1.00%20 5 2.10% 1.00%20 5 2.10% 1.00%
Family’s house 37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%37 8 3.40% 0.80%
Official residence 1 1 0.60% 1.30%1 1 0.60% 1.30%1 1 0.60% 1.30%1 1 0.60% 1.30%
House for rent 26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%26 10 3.10% 1.80%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 43 14 2.70% 1.00%
Perpus
takaa
n 43 14 2.70% 1.00%
41 10 2.80% 1.40%
Perpus
takaa
n 41 10 2.80% 1.40%BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
Group of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE
BNNGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCEGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE
BNNGroup of age, educational level, status, residence N PREVALENCE
Male Female Male Female
BNNMale Female Male FemaleMale Female Male Female
BNNMale Female Male Female
BNNBNNBNN
43 14 2.70% 1.00%BNN43 14 2.70% 1.00%43 14 2.70% 1.00%BNN43 14 2.70% 1.00%
53Prevalence Survey 2018
The survey in 2018 was also targeted on the age of workers
consumed drugs. Types of consumed drugs are divided into 6 (six) groups, namely: potent drugs, addictive substances, psychotropic, natural drugs, synthethic drugs, and semi-synthethic drugs.
Table 20Prevalence Rate of Current User According to the Status of Usage
In 2018, group of workers in 13 capitals of the provinces was
contribution to the economy of the capital of the province. Since agriculture in each city is not among the six major sectors, workers in agriculture sector are not being surveyed.
Type of use N %N %
Experiment 73 1.40%Experiment 73 1.40%Experiment 73 1.40%
Regular 23 0.44%23 0.44%
Addicted 9 0.17%9 0.17%9 0.17%
Injected drug 3 0.06%
Others 92 1.80%92 1.80%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n In 2018, group of workers in 13 capitals of the provinces was
Perpus
takaa
n In 2018, group of workers in 13 capitals of the provinces was
Perpus
takaa
n
contribution to the economy of the capital of the province. Since
Perpus
takaa
n
contribution to the economy of the capital of the province. Since agriculture in each city is not among the six major sectors, workers in
Perpus
takaa
n
agriculture in each city is not among the six major sectors, workers in agriculture sector are not being surveyed.
Perpus
takaa
n
agriculture sector are not being surveyed.
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNN23 0.44%
BNN23 0.44%
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN9 0.17%
BNN9 0.17%9 0.17%
BNN9 0.17%
3 0.06%
BNN3 0.06%3 0.06%
BNN3 0.06%
BNNBNN
92 1.80%BNN92 1.80%92 1.80%BNN92 1.80%
54 Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 21 Prevalence Rate of Current Use
trial is the reason with then highest percentage of 57.7% followed by the reason of being persuaded/forced by friends with the percentage of 11.7%. The reason with the lowest percentage of 0.8% is being persuaded/forced by boyfriend/girlfriend
SECTOR MALE+FEMALE
N %N %
Agriculture
Mining and Quarrying
Processing Industry 9 1.90%9 1.90%
Electricity, gas and water
Construction 15 2.3%15 2.3%
Trade, restaurant, hotel 44 1.80%44 1.80%
Transportation, ware housing, communication 13 2.80%13 2.80%
Finance, real estate, rental and service company 1 0.70%
Social/private services 26 2.60%26 2.60%
POSITION IN COMPANY
Leader (manager, supervisor, foreman) 12 2.40%12 2.40%
Administrative staff 11 1.10%11 1.10%
Operational staff 85 2.30%85 2.30%
STATUS OF STAFFING
Permanent workers 57 2.20%57 2.20%
Contract workers 35 1.70%35 1.70%
Daily workers 15 3.70%15 3.70%
Outsourcing workers 1 0.60%1 0.60%
Others 92 1.80%92 1.80%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
44 1.80%
BNN44 1.80%
13 2.80%
BNN13 2.80%
1
BNN1
55Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 22Respondent’s Reason of Using Drugs for the First Time
3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province
The lowest prevalence rate among drug used-workers in 13 capitals of provinces occurs in Bali and Papua with 1.50%. However, this position is not in line with the prevalence rate of current users-workers in West Kalimantan with 1.00%. Despite that the gap with the lowest
are in the second lowest position after West Kalimantan.
Reason of using drug for the first time N %N %
Experiment 143 57.7143 57.7
Having fun 25 10.125 10.1
Forced by friend 29 11.729 11.7
Forced by lover 2 0.82 0.8
Stressed due to family problem 4 1.64 1.6
Stressed due to personal problem 10 4.010 4.0
Stressed due to work problem 3 1.23 1.2
Being set up 26 10.526 10.5
Others 6 2.46 2.4
Total 248 100.0248 100.0
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province
Perpus
takaa
n 3.3.2. Prevalence Rate per Province
The lowest prevalence rate among drug used-workers in 13
Perpus
takaa
n The lowest prevalence rate among drug used-workers in 13
capitals of provinces occurs in Bali and Papua with 1.50%. However, this
Perpus
takaa
n
capitals of provinces occurs in Bali and Papua with 1.50%. However, this position is not in line with the prevalence rate of current users-workers
Perpus
takaa
n
position is not in line with the prevalence rate of current users-workers in West Kalimantan with 1.00%. Despite that the gap with the lowest
Perpus
takaa
n
in West Kalimantan with 1.00%. Despite that the gap with the lowest
Perpus
takaa
n
are in the second lowest position after West Kalimantan.Perpus
takaa
n
are in the second lowest position after West Kalimantan.
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
26 10.5
BNN26 10.5
6 2.4
BNN6 2.46 2.4
BNN6 2.4
248 100.0
BNN248 100.0
56 Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 23Prevalence Rate of Current Use According to Province and Gender
ProvinceEver used Current use GenderEver used Current use GenderEver used Current use GenderEver used Current use Gender
N %N %N % N %N % Male FemaleMale Female
Aceh 19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%19 4.80% 7 1.80% 2.20% 0.80%
North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%North Sumatera 16 4.00% 6 1.50% 2.00% 0.70%
South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%South Sumatera 30 7.50% 14 3.50% 5.90% 0.60%
Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%Riau Islands 21 5.30% 5 1.30% 1.40% 0.80%
Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80% Jakarta 22 5.50% 6 1.50% 1.80% 0.80%
West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%West java 33 8.30% 22 5.50% 5.20% 5.80%
East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%
Special region of
Yogyakarta
18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -
Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%
East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -
West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%
South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%
Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%
Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%
Based on Table 23, when current user workers are grouped according to gender, it can be seen in Table 24 that in general the average prevalence rate for male in each province is relatively higher than female, except in West Java and Papua where the prevalence rate of female is higher than male.
The province with the highest prevalence rate of male-current users is South Sumatera (5.90%), followed by West Java (5.20%) and East Kalimantan (3.70%). Meanwhile, the highest prevalence rate for female-current user workers is in West Java (5.80%), followed by East Java (1.70%) and Papua (1.30%). The prevalence rate of current user workers in West Java is relatively the same, 5.20% for male and 5.80% for female. Meanwhile, the lowest prevalence rate for female-current
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%
Perpus
takaa
n Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%
East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -
Perpus
takaa
n East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -
Perpus
takaa
n East Kalimantan 21 5.30% 8 2.00% 3.70% -
West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%
Perpus
takaa
n West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%
Perpus
takaa
n West Kalimantan 8 2.00% 4 1.00% 1.4% 0.80%
South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%
Perpus
takaa
n South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%
Perpus
takaa
n South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%
Perpus
takaa
n South Sulawesi 26 6.50% 10 2.50% 3.50% 1.20%
Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%
Perpus
takaa
n
Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%
Perpus
takaa
n
Papua 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.20% 1.30%
Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Total 248 4.80% 108 2.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Based on Table 23, when current user workers are grouped
Perpus
takaa
n
Based on Table 23, when current user workers are grouped according to gender, it can be seen in Table 24 that in general the Perp
ustak
aan
according to gender, it can be seen in Table 24 that in general the average prevalence rate for male in each province is relatively higher Perp
ustak
aan
average prevalence rate for male in each province is relatively higher
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
East java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%
BNNEast java 22 5.50% 11 2.80% 3.20% 1.70%
18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -
BNN18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -
BNN18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -
BNN18 4.50% 5 1.30% 2.30% -
Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%BNNBali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%Bali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%BNNBali 6 1.50% 5 1.30% 1.90% 0.50%
57Prevalence Survey 2018
Survey in 2018 also sees the prevalence rate according to status of drug use, namely whether current users are being in trial with the
to 49 times, addicts with the frequency of more than 50 times in the last one year, and using injection drugs.
Table 24Prevalence Rate of Current Use
According to Province and Status of Usage
user workers is in D.I. Yogyakarta and East Kalimantan with 0% since there are no female workers used drugs in the past year.
Province Experiment RegularExperiment Regular AddictInjected
drug
Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%
North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%
South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%
Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%
Jakarta 1.50%Jakarta 1.50%
West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%
East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%
Special region of
Yogyakarta
1.25% 0.50%1.25% 0.50%
Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%
East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%
West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%West kalimantan 0.75% 0.25%
South Sulawesi 2.00% 0.50%South Sulawesi 2.00% 0.50%South Sulawesi 2.00% 0.50%
Papua 1.00% 0.25%Papua 1.00% 0.25%Papua 1.00% 0.25%Papua 1.00% 0.25%
Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%Total 1.40% 0.44% 0.17 0.06%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%
South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%
Perpus
takaa
n South Sumatera 2.25% 0.50% 0.25% 0.50%
Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n Riau Islands 1.00% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Jakarta 1.50%
Perpus
takaa
n Jakarta 1.50%
West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n
West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n
West java 2.00% 3.00% 0.25% 0.25%
East java 2.00% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n
East java 2.00% 0.25%East java 2.00% 0.25%
Perpus
takaa
n
East java 2.00% 0.25%
1.25% 0.50%
Perpus
takaa
n
1.25% 0.50%
Bali 0.75% 0.50%Perpus
takaa
n
Bali 0.75% 0.50%Bali 0.75% 0.50%Perpus
takaa
n
Bali 0.75% 0.50%
East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%Perp
ustak
aan
East kalimantan 1.50% 0.50%
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNAddict
BNNAddict
Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%BNNAceh 1.00% - 0.75%Aceh 1.00% - 0.75%BNNAceh 1.00% - 0.75%
North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%BNNNorth Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%BNNNorth Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%North Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%BNNNorth Sumatera 1.25% 0.25%
58 Prevalence Survey 2018
3.3.3. Risky Behaviour toward Drug Abuse Among Workers
Survey on drug illicit and abuse in 2018 also touches upon the risky behaviour among workers in the last one year. The risky behaviour consists of three behaviours namely smoking, vaping, and drinking alcohol. The prevalence rate of the most risky behaviour among workers, both male and female, is smoking with 38.20%.
Table 25Number of Smoker, Electric Smoker, and Alcoholics among Workers in
the Past Year According to Gender
years old. They did vaping at the age of 10 years old and drinking alcohol at the age of 7 years old.
Kind of worker’s habitMale Female TotalMale Female TotalMale Female TotalMale Female Total
N %N % N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %N % N %
Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%
Smoking electric cigarette (vaping) 290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%
Drinking alcohol 752Drinking alcohol 752 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%
Type of Worker’s
habit Mean MedianMean Median Mode Minimum MaximumMode Minimum MaximumMode Minimum Maximum
Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54Smoking cigarette 18 18 20 6 54
Smoking electric
cigarette (vaping)
24 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 4224 22 20 10 42
Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45Drinking alcohol 20 20 20 7 45
Tabel 26Umur Pertama kali Merokok, Mengisap Rokok Elektrik, dan Minum
Minuman Beralkohol Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
years old. They did vaping at the age of 10 years old and drinking
Perpus
takaa
n
years old. They did vaping at the age of 10 years old and drinking alcohol at the age of 7 years old.
Perpus
takaa
n
alcohol at the age of 7 years old.
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%
Perpus
takaa
n 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%
Perpus
takaa
n 24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Tabel 26
Perpus
takaa
n
Tabel 26Umur Pertama kali Merokok, Mengisap Rokok Elektrik, dan Minum
Perpus
takaa
n
Umur Pertama kali Merokok, Mengisap Rokok Elektrik, dan Minum Minuman Beralkohol Perpus
takaa
n
Minuman Beralkohol
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNN % N %
BNNN % N %N % N %
BNNN % N %
Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%
BNNSmoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%
BNNSmoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%Smoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%
BNNSmoking cigarette 1.879 61.30% 105 4.90% 1,984 38.20%
290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%BNN290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%BNN290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%BNN290 9.50% 32 1.50% 322 6.20%
24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%BNN24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%BNN24.50% 125 5.90% 877 16.90%
59Prevalence Survey 2018
3.3.4. Source to Obtain Drugs Among Workers
Based on Table 27, workers obtain drugs mostly by being given by hang out friends with the percentage of 23.00%. The second source to obtain drugs with the percentage of 21.40% is by buying from hang out friends. Hence, hang out friends are the easiest source to obtain drugs. The least wat to obtain drugs is through relatives/family with the percentage of 2.40% followed by being given by unknown person with the percentage of 3.20%.
Table 27Ways to Obtain Drugs (N= 248)
The way to get drug N %N %
Directly buying from the dealer 44 17.70%44 17.70%
buying from the courier 40 16.10%40 16.10%
buying from office mate 26 10.50%26 10.50%
Buying from other than office mate 41 16.50%41 16.50%
Buying from hangout friends 53 21.40%53 21.40%
Buying from friends with the same hobby 25 10.10%25 10.10%
Buying from relatives 6 2.40%6 2.40%
Buying in drug store 19 7.70%19 7.70%
Buying from the strangers 13 5.20%13 5.20%
Given by lover 16 6.50%16 6.50%
Given by office mate 24 9.70%24 9.70%
Given by friends other than office mate 39 15.70%39 15.70%
Given by hangout friends 57 23.00%57 23.00%
Given by friends with the same hobby 30 12.10%30 12.10%
Given by relatives 14 5.60%14 5.60%
Given by strangers 8 3.20%8 3.20%
Given by parents 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Others 7 2.80%7 2.80%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Buying from friends with the same hobby
Perpus
takaa
n Buying from friends with the same hobby
Buying from the strangers
Perpus
takaa
n
Buying from the strangers
Given by lover
Perpus
takaa
n
Given by lover
Given by office matePerpus
takaa
n
Given by office mate
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNN %
BNNN %
44 17.70%
BNN44 17.70%
60 Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 28 shows the level of easiness in obtaining drugs and types of drugs in eoking place. The categories are very easy, easy, not easy, and doesn’t know. Among workers, marijuana is type of drugs that is easy (5.205) and very easy to be obtaines in working place (5.20%). Other types of drugs with very easy and easy category are shabu, yaba, SS, tastus, ubas with the percentage of 4.00%. The survey also
Table 28
The Ease of Obtaining Drugs in Workplace According to Types of Drugs (N = 248)
Type of Drug
Ease of Getting Drug
Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t
know
Marijuana 5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%
Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%
Ecstasy 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%
Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%
Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%
Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%
Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%
Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%
Perpus
takaa
n Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%
Perpus
takaa
n 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%
Perpus
takaa
n 2.00% 3.60% 21.40% 73.00%
Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%
Perpus
takaa
n Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%
Perpus
takaa
n Methamphetamine 4.00% 4.00% 21.40% 70.60%
Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%
Perpus
takaa
n Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%
Perpus
takaa
n Putau (heroin) 2.00% 2.00% 19.40% 76.60%
Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%
Perpus
takaa
n
Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%
Perpus
takaa
n
Morphine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 75.40%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%
Perpus
takaa
n
Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%
Perpus
takaa
n
Cocaine 1.20% 1.60% 21.80% 76.20%
Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%
Perpus
takaa
n
Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%
Perpus
takaa
n
Others 0.40% - 69.40% 30.20%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
Ease of Getting Drug
BNNEase of Getting Drug
Very Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t
BNNVery Easy Easy Not Easy Don’t
5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%BNN5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%BNN5.20% 5.20% 22.20% 67.30%
Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%BNNBear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%Bear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%BNNBear tobacco, gorilla tobacco 0.80% 3.60% 19.40% 76.20%
61
FAMILY VULNERABILITYIN FACING THE DANGEROF DRUG ABUSE
IV
Perpus
takaa
n FAMILY VULNERABILITY
Perpus
takaa
n FAMILY VULNERABILITYIN FACING THE DANGER
Perpus
takaa
n IN FACING THE DANGER
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n OF DRUG ABUSE
Perpus
takaa
n OF DRUG ABUSE
BNNFAMILY VULNERABILITYBNNFAMILY VULNERABILITY
62
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
63Prevalence Survey 2018
FAMILY VULNERABILITY IN FACING THE DANGER OF DRUG ABUSE
4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography
Household in this research is a group of people living in the same house and consuming the food from the same kitchen. In other word, household is a residential unit with the orientation on duties to carry out economy-production, consumption and distribution function to meet the daily need. But the most important thing is the social unit with the interaction between one household and anothers (Fox, 1982)..10
The number of research sample in drug abuse prevention is 5,200 housheolds spread in 13 capitals of provinces in Indonesia. A number of 400 households in each province (capital of the province) is taken
questions in the quiestionaire. The target of household respondents reaches 100 percent.
Around 46.92% respondents are son/daughter and son/daughter-in-law. The proportion of son/daughter and son/daughter-in-law living in the same house shows the characteristic of respondent household with little children and children in school age who are still under the
10 Fox, R, .1982 Kinship and Marriage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IV
Perpus
takaa
n 4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography
Perpus
takaa
n 4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography
Household in this research is a group of people living in the same
Perpus
takaa
n Household in this research is a group of people living in the same
house and consuming the food from the same kitchen. In other word,
Perpus
takaa
n house and consuming the food from the same kitchen. In other word, household is a residential unit with the orientation on duties to carry out
Perpus
takaa
n household is a residential unit with the orientation on duties to carry out economy-production, consumption and distribution function to meet
Perpus
takaa
n
economy-production, consumption and distribution function to meet the daily need. But the most important thing is the social unit with the
Perpus
takaa
n
the daily need. But the most important thing is the social unit with the interaction between one household and anothers (Fox, 1982)..
Perpus
takaa
n
interaction between one household and anothers (Fox, 1982)..
The number of research sample in drug abuse prevention is 5,200 Perpus
takaa
n
The number of research sample in drug abuse prevention is 5,200 housheolds spread in 13 capitals of provinces in Indonesia. A number Perp
ustak
aan
housheolds spread in 13 capitals of provinces in Indonesia. A number
BNN4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography BNN4.1.1. Characteristic of Household Demography
64 Prevalence Survey 2018
parents’ supervision. Meanwhile, son/daughter-in-law living in the same house does not mean that they are not independent. It is more on the reason that they are there to takecare elderly parents. Thus, they are not leaving the house.
Another biggest proportion is more household in research location
household is represented only husband or wife. This data strengthen the previous hypothesis that many son/daughter and son/daughter-in-law are not allowed to leave the house to takecare the parents.
4.1.2 Gender of Household Members
Reviewed from the composition of the household members’ gender in 13 research locations, the number of male is bigger than female (50.1% compared to 49.9%) (see Graphic 10). This data shows that the sex ratio of household members is similar to sex ratio of Indonesian population in total. It means that the number of male and female population is balanced. It can be summarized that their participation is economic development is the same.
Graphic 9. Number of Household Members
50,00
45,00
40,00
35,00
30,00
25,00
20,00
15,00
10,00
5,00
0,00
Head of House
hold
Wife/H
usband
Grandchild
ren
Parents/parents-
in-law
Relatives
Others
24,59 21,78
46,92
1,50 2,19 0,29
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
son/d
aughter/son-in
-law/
Perpus
takaa
n
son/d
aughter/son-in
-law/
son/d
aughter/son-in
-law/
Perpus
takaa
n
son/d
aughter/son-in
-law/
daughter-in-la
w
Perpus
takaa
n
daughter-in-la
w
Perpus
takaa
n
Grandchild
ren
Perpus
takaa
n
Grandchild
ren
Perpus
takaa
n 2,73
Perpus
takaa
n 2,73
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNN
65Prevalence Survey 2018
4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age
The distribution of household member respondents according to age shows that most respondents are young. The group of young respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and 20 to 24 years old with the percentage of 10 percent each (Graphic 11). Conversely, the proportion of household members in older age is declining. This graphic also shows that the pyramid of household members is big in the middle and smaller in the upper and lower part.
The number of household members wih young age is almost the same with the composition of Indonesian population according to age. Based on composition of age of household member respondents, it can be concluded that the ratio of deopendency is low. Thus, it is assumed that the economic potential in a region is the high number of productive age. The high number of productive age can be utilized optimally as an asset in resources development.
On the other hand, many of them are household member respondents in school age. Usually, this group of age is evry vulnerable to drug abuse. In fact, older population is also involved in drug abuse. It is proved that drug offenders are mostly over 50 years old.11
Graphic 10. Gender of Household Members
Male Female
50,149,9
11 Interview with Head of LAPAS Class IIA. Banda Aceh
Perpus
takaa
n respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and
Perpus
takaa
n respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and 20 to 24 years old with the percentage of 10 percent each
Perpus
takaa
n 20 to 24 years old with the percentage of 10 percent each Conversely, the proportion of household members in older age
Perpus
takaa
n Conversely, the proportion of household members in older age
is declining. This graphic also shows that the pyramid of household
Perpus
takaa
n is declining. This graphic also shows that the pyramid of household members is big in the middle and smaller in the upper and lower part.
Perpus
takaa
n members is big in the middle and smaller in the upper and lower part.
The number of household members wih young age is almost the
Perpus
takaa
n
The number of household members wih young age is almost the same with the composition of Indonesian population according to age.
Perpus
takaa
n
same with the composition of Indonesian population according to age. Based on composition of age of household member respondents, it can
Perpus
takaa
n
Based on composition of age of household member respondents, it can be concluded that the ratio of deopendency is low. Thus, it is assumed Perp
ustak
aan
be concluded that the ratio of deopendency is low. Thus, it is assumed that the economic potential in a region is the high number of productive Perp
ustak
aan
that the economic potential in a region is the high number of productive
BNN4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age
BNN4.1.3. Composition of Household Members According to Age
The distribution of household member respondents according
BNNThe distribution of household member respondents according to age shows that most respondents are young. The group of young BNNto age shows that most respondents are young. The group of young respondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and BNNrespondents is in productive age ranging from 15 to 19 years old and
66 Prevalence Survey 2018
4.1.4. Marital Status of Household Members
Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. It is well understood since the research is conducted in household. Meanwhile, the proportion of not married respondents is 28.32%.
MaleFemale
Graphic 12. Marital Status of Household Members
28,32
64,9070,00
60,00
50,00
40,00
30,00
20,00
10,00
0,00
Not Married Married Widow/Widower
6,78
Graphic 11. Household Members by Gender
-15,00 -10,00 -5,00 0,00 5,00 10,00 15,00
60 years old+
60-64 years old
55-59 years old 55-59 years old 55-59 y
50-54 years old 50-54 years old 50-54 y
45-49 years old 45-49 years old 45-49 y
40-44 years old 40-44 years old 40-44 y
35-39 years old 35-39 years old 35-39 y
30-34 years old 30-34 years old 30-34 y
25-29 years old 25-29 years old 25-29 y
20-24 years old 20-24 years old 20-24 y
15-19 years old 15-19 years old 15-19 y
10-14 years old 10-14 years old 10-14 y
5-9 years old 5-9 years old 5-9 y
0-4 years old 0-4 years old 0-4 y
Perpus
takaa
n Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905.
Perpus
takaa
n Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. It is well understood since the research is conducted in household.
Perpus
takaa
n It is well understood since the research is conducted in household. Meanwhile, the proportion of not married respondents is 28.32%.
Perpus
takaa
n Meanwhile, the proportion of not married respondents is 28.32%.
Graphic 12. Marital Status of Household Members
Perpus
takaa
n Graphic 12. Marital Status of Household Members
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
Married respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. BNNMarried respondents show the biggest proportion with 64.905. BNN
67Prevalence Survey 2018
4.1.5. Residence Status of Household Members
The highest distribution of household members’ residence status is living in their own residence (61/6%). This data indirectly shows the socio-economy level of the household members. Meanwhile, household member respondents who reside in leased residence is 19.1%. Those who reside in parents/parents-in-law’s house is 14.5%. Only few reside in
13).
4.2. Social Condition
4.2.1. Education
PBoth formal and non formal education is one of the means in improving the quality of human resources in a region, especially in supporting the development. According to the level of education, the distribution of household respondents is dominated by Senior High School graduates with 39.77% followed by Elementary School graduates with 22.14%, Junior High School graduates with 17.21% and University graduates with 15.18% (Graphic 14). It can be concluded that
half of respondents are Senior High School or University graduates.
Graphic 13. Residence Status
70,00
60,00
50,00
40,00
30,00
20,00
10,00
0,00
own residence
official residence
lease
parents-in-law/parents residence
relatives residence
others
61,6
19,1
14,5
1,1 2,4
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
4.2. Social Condition
Perpus
takaa
n
4.2. Social Condition
4.2.1. EducationPerpus
takaa
n
4.2.1. Education
1,3
Perpus
takaa
n 1,3
Perpus
takaa
n 2,4
Perpus
takaa
n 2,4
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNown residence
BNNown residence
BNNofficial residence
BNNofficial residence
68 Prevalence Survey 2018
4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household
the toughness of a household. Head of household, both a father or a mother, is a captain to guide and shape the character of household members which is different one to another. Related to drugs abuse, head of household has an important role in taking care each member of the household from the use of illicit goods.
The result of research on drug abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces shows that a father or a mother as the head of household is in majority having the status of ordinary people. The slight difference is that a
a mother as a head of household (10.1% compared to 5.96%) (Graphic 15).
Graphic 14. Level of Education of Household Members
5,715,715,715,715,715,71
15,1815,1815,1815,1815,1815,1815,1815,18
39,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,7739,77
17,2117,2117,2117,2117,2117,2117,21
22,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,1422,14
45,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,0045,00
40,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,0040,00
35,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,0035,00
30,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,0030,00
25,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,0025,00
20,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,0020,00
15,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,0015,00
10,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,0010,00
5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00
0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Not yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in schoolNot yet in school UniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversityUniversity
Elementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary SchoolElementary School
Junior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High SchoolJunior High School
Senior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High SchoolSenior High School
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n the toughness of a household. Head of household, both a father or a
Perpus
takaa
n the toughness of a household. Head of household, both a father or a mother, is a captain to guide and shape the character of household
Perpus
takaa
n mother, is a captain to guide and shape the character of household members which is different one to another. Related to drugs abuse,
Perpus
takaa
n members which is different one to another. Related to drugs abuse, head of household has an important role in taking care each member of
Perpus
takaa
n
head of household has an important role in taking care each member of the household from the use of illicit goods.
Perpus
takaa
n
the household from the use of illicit goods.
The result of research on drug abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces
Perpus
takaa
n
The result of research on drug abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces shows that a father or a mother as the head of household is in majority Perp
ustak
aan
shows that a father or a mother as the head of household is in majority having the status of ordinary people. The slight difference is that a Perp
ustak
aan
having the status of ordinary people. The slight difference is that a
BNN4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household BNN4.2.2. Social Status of the Head of Household BNN
BNNBNNBNN
69Prevalence Survey 2018
4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation
The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the last one month shows biggest portion in respondents with occupation (46.56%). Most of the working respondents are male. This phenomenon usually occurs in the society since male is taking the responsibility in a household. Meanwhile, the unemployed household members or those who are applying for jobs is 11.10% (Graphic 16).
Graphic 15. Social Status of Head of Household
100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%
60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%60%
40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%
0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%FatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFatherFather MotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMotherMother
Public FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic FigurePublic Figure Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People Ordinary People
10,10 5,96
89,90 94,04
Graphic 16. Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Monthothers, mention it: 2,12%
Taking care of household
17,50%
working ; 46,56%
Studying at school 22,75%
unemployed; 11,07%
Perpus
takaa
n The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the
Perpus
takaa
n The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the last one month shows biggest portion in respondents with occupation
Perpus
takaa
n last one month shows biggest portion in respondents with occupation (46.56%). Most of the working respondents are male. This phenomenon
Perpus
takaa
n (46.56%). Most of the working respondents are male. This phenomenon usually occurs in the society since male is taking the responsibility in a
Perpus
takaa
n usually occurs in the society since male is taking the responsibility in a household. Meanwhile, the unemployed household members or those
Perpus
takaa
n household. Meanwhile, the unemployed household members or those who are applying for jobs is 11.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
who are applying for jobs is 11.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 16. Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 16. Household Members’ Main Activity in the Past Month
Perpus
takaa
n
Taking care of household Perpus
takaa
n
Taking care of household
17,50%Perpus
takaa
n
17,50%
BNNBNN4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation
BNN4.2.3. Economic Condition of Household According to Occupation
The distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the BNNThe distribution of household member respondents’ activity in the
70 Prevalence Survey 2018
4.2.4. Household’s Average Income and Spending
Income and spending are two economic indicators which become the measurement to describe society’s welfare in a region. The higher amount of income and spending in a society becomes a proxy that the people’s welfare of the area is improving. The improving economic condition in a region refers to the development of Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP).
each supporting sector. GRDP of a region is derived from three sectors namely primary, secondary, and tertiary sector. The primary sector is a sector of which the main activity related to direct natural resources management such as agriculture, mining and quarrying. Secondary sector is the sector which further manages primary sector, such as gas processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting production sector such as tarde, services, hotel, telecommunication, and transportation.
According to household’s average income and spending in 13 capitals of the provinces, it can be described that the income is two times higher then the spending (Rp. 4.46 million compared to Rp 2.75 million) (Table 29). This data indirectly shows that most respondents have very good level of welfare. It means that the average of household respondents have the residual income due to less spending.
Table 29. Household Income and Spending
Data Income SpendingIncome Spending
Mean 4,462,676 2,758,7714,462,676 2,758,771
Median 3,500,000 2,350,0003,500,000 2,350,000
Mode 3,000,000 2,000,0003,000,000 2,000,000
Standard Deviation 3,359,972 1,868,223Standard Deviation 3,359,972 1,868,223Standard Deviation 3,359,972 1,868,223
Minimum 100,000 80,00
Maximum 42,000,000 20,000,00042,000,000 20,000,000
Perpus
takaa
n processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting
Perpus
takaa
n processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting production sector such as tarde, services, hotel, telecommunication,
Perpus
takaa
n production sector such as tarde, services, hotel, telecommunication,
According to household’s average income and spending in 13
Perpus
takaa
n According to household’s average income and spending in 13
capitals of the provinces, it can be described that the income is two
Perpus
takaa
n
capitals of the provinces, it can be described that the income is two times higher then the spending (Rp. 4.46 million compared to Rp 2.75
Perpus
takaa
n
times higher then the spending (Rp. 4.46 million compared to Rp 2.75 This data indirectly shows that most respondents
Perpus
takaa
n
This data indirectly shows that most respondents have very good level of welfare. It means that the average of household
Perpus
takaa
n
have very good level of welfare. It means that the average of household respondents have the residual income due to less spending.
Perpus
takaa
n
respondents have the residual income due to less spending.
Table 29. Household Income and Spending Perpus
takaa
n
Table 29. Household Income and Spending
BNNa sector of which the main activity related to direct natural resources
BNNa sector of which the main activity related to direct natural resources management such as agriculture, mining and quarrying. Secondary
BNNmanagement such as agriculture, mining and quarrying. Secondary sector is the sector which further manages primary sector, such as gas BNNsector is the sector which further manages primary sector, such as gas processing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting BNNprocessing industry, water and building. Tertiary sector is the supporting
71Prevalence Survey 2018
4.3. Sensitivity of Household toward the Danger of Drugs
4.3.1. Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs
Almost all residential environments are involved in drugs, both as dealer, user, dealings with the police, or deceased victim due to drugs. Despite that the percentage of each category is below 15%, the data shows that the level of exposure of the environment toward the danger of drugs is quite high. It can be seen from the result of research in 13 capitals of the provinces that the level of exposure of drug users in residential environment is quite high of 14.0 (Table 30).
Despite of its small proportion, there are inhabitants died due to drugs exposure (4.8%). Anticipation should be taken immediately upon this warning to early prevent illicit drugs in residential environment and its inhabitants.
Table 30Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs
4.3.2. Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use
In general, there are three impacts when someone uses drugs namely health, social, and economic impact. The three impacts are correlated one and another. If someone’s health is worsening due to
More than three fourth of respondents say that drug abuse gives impact on health such as stress (84.06%), hallucination (84.375), dependency (84.48%), and concentration disruption in studying (81.96%).
Description Many Few NoneMany Few NoneMany Few NoneMany Few NoneDon’t know
People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5
People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7
People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6
People arrested by the police as they use drug 10.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.910.5 16.7 45.8 26.9
People died as they use drug 4.8 7.1 61.1 27.04.8 7.1 61.1 27.04.8 7.1 61.1 27.04.8 7.1 61.1 27.0Perpus
takaa
n Table 30
Perpus
takaa
n Table 30Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs
Perpus
takaa
n Environment Exposure from the Danger of Drugs
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Many Few None
Perpus
takaa
n Many Few None
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5
Perpus
takaa
n
People dealing drug in your environment 11.2 13.6 44.7 30.5
People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7
Perpus
takaa
n
People using drug in your neighbourhood 14.0 17.5 40.8 27.7
People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6
Perpus
takaa
n
People arrested by the police as they deal drug 9.7 14.7 47.1 28.6
People arrested by the police as they use drug
Perpus
takaa
n
People arrested by the police as they use drug
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
People died as they use drugPerpus
takaa
n
People died as they use drug
BNNDespite of its small proportion, there are inhabitants died due to
BNNDespite of its small proportion, there are inhabitants died due to
drugs exposure (4.8%). Anticipation should be taken immediately upon
BNNdrugs exposure (4.8%). Anticipation should be taken immediately upon this warning to early prevent illicit drugs in residential environment and
BNNthis warning to early prevent illicit drugs in residential environment and
72 Prevalence Survey 2018
The social impact of drugs is varied according to social relation. However, most respondents say that drug users are mostly shunned by others. The research shows that most drug user-respondents in their social relation will be shunned since they interference the relation with neighbours (61.5%), friends (56.25), relatives (39.0%), and society near residence (56.5%) (Table 31).
Description Yes NoYes NoDon’t
know Total
A. Health Impact
Drug abuse potentially causes stress 84.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.00
Drug abuse can lead to hallucination 84.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.00
Drug abuse can make nore energetic 49.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.0049.31 19.37 31.33 100.00
Drug abuse can cause addiction 84.48 2.10 13.42 100,0084.48 2.10 13.42 100,0084.48 2.10 13.42 100,00
Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00
B. Social Impact
1. Drug use impact to neighbourhood relationship
a.Shunned 61.5 26.7 11.9 100,0061.5 26.7 11.9 100,0061.5 26.7 11.9 100,0061.5 26.7 11.9 100,00
b. Bullied 20.0 57.8 22.2 100.0020.0 57.8 22.2 100.0020.0 57.8 22.2 100.0020.0 57.8 22.2 100.00
c. Hostile 23.8 55.6 20.7 100.0023.8 55.6 20.7 100.0023.8 55.6 20.7 100.0023.8 55.6 20.7 100.00
d. Ostracized 28.1 51.9 19.9 100.0028.1 51.9 19.9 100.0028.1 51.9 19.9 100.0028.1 51.9 19.9 100.00
2. Drug use impact to friendship
a.Shunned 56.2 30.7 13.1 100.0056.2 30.7 13.1 100.0056.2 30.7 13.1 100.0056.2 30.7 13.1 100.00
b. Bullied 20.4 57.7 21.9 100.0020.4 57.7 21.9 100.0020.4 57.7 21.9 100.0020.4 57.7 21.9 100.00
c. Hostile 23.2 55.4 21.4 100.0023.2 55.4 21.4 100.0023.2 55.4 21.4 100.0023.2 55.4 21.4 100.00
d. Ostracized 27.3 52.4 20.3 100.0027.3 52.4 20.3 100.0027.3 52.4 20.3 100.0027.3 52.4 20.3 100.00
3. Drug use impact to family relationship
a.Shunned 39.0 48.6 12.3 100.0039.0 48.6 12.3 100.0039.0 48.6 12.3 100.0039.0 48.6 12.3 100.00
b. Bullied 16.0 64.2 19.7 100.0016.0 64.2 19.7 100.0016.0 64.2 19.7 100.0016.0 64.2 19.7 100.00
c. Hostile 16.8 63.8 19.5 100.0016.8 63.8 19.5 100.0016.8 63.8 19.5 100.0016.8 63.8 19.5 100.00
d. Ostracized 19.8 61.6 18.7 100.0019.8 61.6 18.7 100.0019.8 61.6 18.7 100.0019.8 61.6 18.7 100.00
Table 31Knowledge on the Impact of Drugs Use
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00
Perpus
takaa
n 49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00
84.48 2.10 13.42 100,00
Perpus
takaa
n 84.48 2.10 13.42 100,0084.48 2.10 13.42 100,00
Perpus
takaa
n 84.48 2.10 13.42 100,00
Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00
Perpus
takaa
n Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00
Perpus
takaa
n Drug abuse can interfere concentration in studying 81.96 2.31 15.73 100.00
1. Drug use impact to neighbourhood relationship
Perpus
takaa
n
1. Drug use impact to neighbourhood relationship
2. Drug use impact to friendship Perpus
takaa
n
2. Drug use impact to friendship
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN84.06 2.35 13.60 100.00
BNN84.06 2.35 13.60 100.0084.06 2.35 13.60 100.00
BNN84.06 2.35 13.60 100.00
84.37 1.85 13.79 100.00BNN84.37 1.85 13.79 100.0084.37 1.85 13.79 100.00BNN84.37 1.85 13.79 100.00
49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00BNN49.31 19.37 31.33 100.00
73Prevalence Survey 2018
4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and Occupation
The respondents’ knowledge on drugs prone-place and occupation is varied. However, the most drugs-prone place according to respondents is nightclubs with 94.12%. Other drugs illicit-prone places are hotel apartment, and low cost apartment (72.46%). The next prone-places are boarding house/dormitory (68.12%), billyard place (67.85%), and hangout places (66.56%) (Table 32).
Description Yes NoYes NoDon’t
know Total
4. Drug use effect to social relationship in the neighbourhood
a.Shunned 56.5 30.3 13.2 100.0056.5 30.3 13.2 100.0056.5 30.3 13.2 100.0056.5 30.3 13.2 100.00
b. Bullied 21.1 57.0 21.9 100.00b. Bullied 21.1 57.0 21.9 100.00b. Bullied 21.1 57.0 21.9 100.00b. Bullied 21.1 57.0 21.9 100.00b. Bullied 21.1 57.0 21.9 100.00
c. Hostile 24.3 54.4 21.2 100.0024.3 54.4 21.2 100.0024.3 54.4 21.2 100.0024.3 54.4 21.2 100.00
d. Ostracized 29.6 51.2 19.2 100.0029.6 51.2 19.2 100.0029.6 51.2 19.2 100.0029.6 51.2 19.2 100.00
C. Economic effect
Study continuity 89.5 2.7 7.8 100.0089.5 2.7 7.8 100.0089.5 2.7 7.8 100.0089.5 2.7 7.8 100.00
Difficulty to get job 86.2 3.6 10.3 100.0086.2 3.6 10.3 100.0086.2 3.6 10.3 100.0086.2 3.6 10.3 100.00
Family burden 89.6 2.4 8.0 100.0089.6 2.4 8.0 100.0089.6 2.4 8.0 100.0089.6 2.4 8.0 100.00
Spending the saving 88.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.00
Wasting family’s properties 89.6 2.3 10.0 100.0089.6 2.3 10.0 100.0089.6 2.3 10.0 100.00
Selling personal asset 87.9 2.2 9.9 100.0087.9 2.2 9.9 100.0087.9 2.2 9.9 100.00
Spending on cost due to law process 85.9 2.7 11.4 100.0085.9 2.7 11.4 100.0085.9 2.7 11.4 100.0085.9 2.7 11.4 100.00
Adding Debt 86.7 2.4 10.9 100.0086.7 2.4 10.9 100.0086.7 2.4 10.9 100.0086.7 2.4 10.9 100.00
Conducting crime (stealing , robbing) 88.8 2.4 8.8 100.0088.8 2.4 8.8 100.0088.8 2.4 8.8 100.0088.8 2.4 8.8 100.00
Being drug courier 84.6 2.8 12.6 100.0084.6 2.8 12.6 100.0084.6 2.8 12.6 100.0084.6 2.8 12.6 100.00
Immoral act 81.3 4.1 14.6 100.0081.3 4.1 14.6 100.0081.3 4.1 14.6 100.0081.3 4.1 14.6 100.00
Lainnya 2,0 3,7 94,3 100,002,0 3,7 94,3 100,002,0 3,7 94,3 100,002,0 3,7 94,3 100,00
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00
Perpus
takaa
n 85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00
86.7 2.4 10.9 100.00
Perpus
takaa
n 86.7 2.4 10.9 100.00
Perpus
takaa
n
4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and OccupationPerpus
takaa
n
4.3.3. Knowledge on Drugs Prone-Place and OccupationPerpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN88.3 2.4 9.3 100.00
BNN88.3 2.4 9.3 100.0088.3 2.4 9.3 100.00
BNN88.3 2.4 9.3 100.00
89.6 2.3 10.0 100.00
BNN89.6 2.3 10.0 100.0089.6 2.3 10.0 100.00
BNN89.6 2.3 10.0 100.00
87.9 2.2 9.9 100.00BNN87.9 2.2 9.9 100.0087.9 2.2 9.9 100.00BNN87.9 2.2 9.9 100.00
85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00BNN85.9 2.7 11.4 100.00
74 Prevalence Survey 2018
4.3.4. View and Attitude on Drugs Abuse
People’s view on drugs abuse is changing through the years. In the past, people thought that the main factor which caused drugs abuse was worse social conditions such as habitation, unemployment, and poverty. It is highly dependent on someone’s knowledge. However, this view is shifting. People said that drugs abuse was caused by family issue. This view occurred since 1960s (Pattison, 1980).12
The research on drugs abuse in 13 capitals of the provinces shows that most household respondents (92.8%) are not agree on drugs abuse (Graphic 17). It means that there is a tendency of respondents to avoid, keep a distance, and hate drugs abuse which is now very booming. It is since most household respondents have the basic knowledge on drugs abuse that it gives a positive impact on forming the respondents’ attitude especially in avoiding and keeping a distance from drugs abuse.
Location Yes No totalYes No totalYes No total
Nightclubs (discotheque, bar, pub,and cafe) 94.12 5.88 100.0094.12 5.88 100.0094.12 5.88 100.00
Salon, spa, massage parlor 50.15 49.85 100.0050.15 49.85 100.0050.15 49.85 100.00
lounge 66.56 33.44 100.0066.56 33.44 100.0066.56 33.44 100.00
Coffee shop, Javanese food stall (angkringan) 41.10 58.90 100.0041.10 58.90 100.0041.10 58.90 100.00
Billiard center 67.85 32.15 100.0067.85 32.15 100.0067.85 32.15 100.00
Internet cafe 49.42 50.58 100.0049.42 50.58 100.0049.42 50.58 100.00
Hotel, apartment, low cost apartment 72.26 27.54 100.0072.26 27.54 100.0072.26 27.54 100.00
restaurant 32.46 67.54 100.0032.46 67.54 100.0032.46 67.54 100.00
Boarding house 68.12 31.88 100.0068.12 31.88 100.0068.12 31.88 100.00
school/campus 48.85 51.15 100.0048.85 51.15 100.00
Work place 39.65 60.35 100.0039.65 60.35 100.0039.65 60.35 100.00
Street alleys 65.54 35.46 100.0065.54 35.46 100.0065.54 35.46 100.00
Others 3.83 96.17 100.003.83 96.17 100.003.83 96.17 100.00
12 Pattison. 1980. “Pandangan Keluarga dan Masyarakat Terhadap Permasalahan Penyalahgunaan dan
Ketergantungan Narkoba”. Medanoline.
Table 32
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
4.3.4. View and Attitude on Drugs Abuse
Perpus
takaa
n
4.3.4. View and Attitude on Drugs Abuse
People’s view on drugs abuse is changing through the years. In the
Perpus
takaa
n
People’s view on drugs abuse is changing through the years. In the past, people thought that the main factor which caused drugs abuse
Perpus
takaa
n
past, people thought that the main factor which caused drugs abuse was worse social conditions such as habitation, unemployment, and
Perpus
takaa
n
was worse social conditions such as habitation, unemployment, and poverty. It is highly dependent on someone’s knowledge. However, this Perp
ustak
aan
poverty. It is highly dependent on someone’s knowledge. However, this view is shifting. People said that drugs abuse was caused by family Perp
ustak
aan
view is shifting. People said that drugs abuse was caused by family Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN32.46 67.54 100.00
BNN32.46 67.54 100.00
68.12 31.88 100.00
BNN68.12 31.88 100.0068.12 31.88 100.00
BNN68.12 31.88 100.00
48.85 51.15 100.00
BNN48.85 51.15 100.0048.85 51.15 100.00
BNN48.85 51.15 100.00
39.65 60.35 100.00BNN39.65 60.35 100.00
75Prevalence Survey 2018
4.4. Household Exposure Toward the Danger of Drugs
4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members
The risky behaviour is negative behaviour which enables someone to be exposed by drugs. Several risky behaviours in this book include smoking, vaping, drinking alcohol, visiting nightclubs, and hanging out.
Graphic 18 below shows that 16.44% of household members have the habit of smoking. Meanwhile, 45.98% of household members don not have the habit of smoking. However, it should be noted that many respondents do not know wthether that their members are smoking or not (37.58%). It shows their ignorance toward the behaviour of their household members.
Graphic 17. Attitude toward Drugs Abuse
2,6%2,6% 4,5%4,5%
92,8%
a. agree b. disagree c. ignorantc. ignorant
Yes No Dont know/no answer
16,44%37,58%37,58%
45,98%45,98%
Graphic 18. Household Members with Smoking HabitGraphic 18. Household Members with Smoking Habit
Perpus
takaa
n 4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members
Perpus
takaa
n 4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members
The risky behaviour is negative behaviour which enables someone
Perpus
takaa
n The risky behaviour is negative behaviour which enables someone to be exposed by drugs. Several risky behaviours in this book include
Perpus
takaa
n to be exposed by drugs. Several risky behaviours in this book include smoking, vaping, drinking alcohol, visiting nightclubs, and hanging out.
Perpus
takaa
n smoking, vaping, drinking alcohol, visiting nightclubs, and hanging out.
Graphic 18 below shows that 16.44% of household members have
Perpus
takaa
n
Graphic 18 below shows that 16.44% of household members have the habit of smoking. Meanwhile, 45.98% of household members don
Perpus
takaa
n
the habit of smoking. Meanwhile, 45.98% of household members don not have the habit of smoking. However, it should be noted that many
Perpus
takaa
n
not have the habit of smoking. However, it should be noted that many respondents do not know wthether that their members are smoking
Perpus
takaa
n
respondents do not know wthether that their members are smoking or not (37.58%). It shows their ignorance toward the behaviour of their Perp
ustak
aan
or not (37.58%). It shows their ignorance toward the behaviour of their household members. Perp
ustak
aan
household members.
BNNBNN4.4. Household Exposure Toward the Danger of Drugs
BNN4.4. Household Exposure Toward the Danger of Drugs
4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household MembersBNN4.4.1. Risky Behaviour of Household Members
76 Prevalence Survey 2018
Meanwhile, household members with risky behaviour usually have the habit of vaping (1.98%), drinking alcohol (2.27%), visiting nightclubs (1.00%), and hanging out (3%).
4.4.2. Household Exposure toward the Danger of Drugs Household exposure shows the quantity of household and
household members exposed to drugs use. The research shows that only 92 households of which the members are exposed to drugs. Meanwhile, there are 102 household members that are exposed to drugs.
Types of drugs mostly used by household member respondents are Methampetamine, such as Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus and Ubas. The number of household members who consume these drugs is 43.1% from the total 102 users. Another type of drugs consumed by household members is marijuana with 25.5% (Graphic 19). Hence, these two types of drgugs are the most popular among household members.
The drugs-exposed household and risky behaviour (smoking, smoking electric cigarette, drinking alcohol, visiting night entertainment place, and night hanging out) are closely related. The result of Chi square shows that all risky behaviours, except smoking electric cigarette
with 1% of the level of mistake.
Graphic 19. Types of Drugs Consumed by Household Members
marijuana and shabu
others, mention it
Putau, Etep, Pete
Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus, Ubas (Methamphetamines)
Ekstasi (inex, XTC, Cece, Happyfive)
Bear or gorilla tobacco
Marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hand-rolled Marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, hand-rolled
Dextro (Dextromethorpan) which is consumed..
Trihexyphenidyl/ Trihex/ THP/ Pil kuning
Koplo Pills, BK, mboat, mboti, roda
substances that are purposively sniffing (ex: glue..)
headache medicine which is mixed with
2,92,9
3,93,9
1,01,0
43,143,1
6,96,9
25,525,5
2,02,0
5,95,9
2,92,9
2,92,9
2,02,0
1,01,0
0,00,0 10,010,0 20,020,0 30,030,0 40,040,0 50,050,0
Perpus
takaa
n (Graphic 19)
Perpus
takaa
n (Graphic 19). Hence, these two types
Perpus
takaa
n . Hence, these two types of drgugs are the most popular among household members.
Perpus
takaa
n of drgugs are the most popular among household members.
The drugs-exposed household and risky behaviour (smoking,
Perpus
takaa
n The drugs-exposed household and risky behaviour (smoking,
smoking electric cigarette, drinking alcohol, visiting night entertainment
Perpus
takaa
n smoking electric cigarette, drinking alcohol, visiting night entertainment place, and night hanging out) are closely related. The result of Chi square
Perpus
takaa
n
place, and night hanging out) are closely related. The result of Chi square shows that all risky behaviours, except smoking electric cigarette
Perpus
takaa
n
shows that all risky behaviours, except smoking electric cigarette
Perpus
takaa
n
with 1% of the level of mistake.
Perpus
takaa
n
with 1% of the level of mistake.
Graphic 19. Types of Drugs Consumed by Household MembersPerpus
takaa
n
Graphic 19. Types of Drugs Consumed by Household MembersPerpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
Types of drugs mostly used by household member respondents
BNNTypes of drugs mostly used by household member respondents
are Methampetamine, such as Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus and Ubas. The
BNNare Methampetamine, such as Shabu, Yaba, SS, Tastus and Ubas. The number of household members who consume these drugs is 43.1%
BNNnumber of household members who consume these drugs is 43.1% from the total 102 users. Another type of drugs consumed by household BNNfrom the total 102 users. Another type of drugs consumed by household
. Hence, these two types BNN
. Hence, these two types
77Prevalence Survey 2018
Besides being exposed to drugs, several household members are also known for having an issue with the law due to drugs, being rehabilitated, or
number of household members who have been sentenced due to drugs is 19.6% or 1 out of 5. The household members who have been rehabilitated are 35.3% or 1 out of 3. Meanwhile, the household members who have
4.5 Household’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs
Each household has a strategy to face drugs’ threat in order to avoid drugs exposure. There are 9 (nine) indicators as the household’s startegies to avoid drugs exposure. They are:1. Involving household members in drug prevention activities2. Spending time together with household members3. Involving household members in religious activities4. Knowing members’ close friends5. Knowing household members’ behavior outside the house6. Prohibiting household members from smoking 7. Prohibiting household members from drinking alcohol8. Prohibiting household members from visiting nightclubs9. Prohibiting household members from hanging out or staying up late
Graphic 20. Household Members Who Have An Issue with Law
Sentenced Due to Drugs120,0
100,0
80,0
60,0
40,0
20,0
0,0having an issue with law
enforcement officersHave been rehabilitated have been sentenced due to drugs
74,5 64,7 80,4
25,5 35,319,6
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Have been rehabilitated
Perpus
takaa
n Have been rehabilitated
Perpus
takaa
n Yes
Perpus
takaa
n Yes
Perpus
takaa
n No
Perpus
takaa
n No
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
4.5 Household’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs
Perpus
takaa
n
4.5 Household’s Strategy to Face the Danger of Drugs
Each household has a strategy to face drugs’ threat in order to avoid
Perpus
takaa
n
Each household has a strategy to face drugs’ threat in order to avoid drugs exposure. There are 9 (nine) indicators as the household’s startegies Perp
ustak
aan
drugs exposure. There are 9 (nine) indicators as the household’s startegies to avoid drugs exposure. They are:Perp
ustak
aan
to avoid drugs exposure. They are:Perpus
takaa
n BNN
78 Prevalence Survey 2018
Graphic 21 shows the head of household’s knowledge on household members’ close friend and behaviour outside the house. Only 47.92% heads of household know most household members’ close friends. Around 40.46% heads of household know very few of household members’ close friends and 12.25% heads of household know none of household members’ close friends.
Graphic 21. Distribution of Household which Knows the Household Members’ Close Friend
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Knowing Most Knowing few Knowing None
47,2947,29
40,4640,46
12,2512,25
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Knowing few
Perpus
takaa
n Knowing few
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNBNNBNNBNN
12,25
BNN12,2512,25
BNN12,25
79
P4GN PROGRAM INTERVENSION(PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)
V
Perpus
takaa
n P4GN PROGRAM
Perpus
takaa
n P4GN PROGRAM INTERVENSION
Perpus
takaa
n INTERVENSION
Perpus
takaa
n (PREVENTION AND
Perpus
takaa
n (PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE
Perpus
takaa
n
ERADICATION OF DRUG ABUSE
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)
Perpus
takaa
n
AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)
BNNP4GN PROGRAM BNNP4GN PROGRAM
80
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
81Prevalence Survey 2018
P4GN PROGRAM INTERVENSION(PREVENTION AND ERADICATION OF DRUG
ABUSE AND ILLICIT TRAFICKING)
5.1. P4GN Program Implementation
The survey shows that the most appropriate activity to deliver P4GN program according to students as respondents is lecture/counselling. The detail percentage is as follow:
1) Lecture/counseling: 1,857 (35.7%) respondents.2) Interactive discussion/dialogue: 399 (7.70%) respondents.
respondents4) Seminar/workshop: 478 (9,20%) respondents.5) Training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company:
779 (15%) respondents.6) Anti-drug campaign: 660 (12.70%) respondents.7) Joint sports activities: 346 (6.70%) respondents.8) Others: 85 (1.60%) of respondents.
The survey also shows that according to students and university student respondents, the police is the most appropriate institution
school/university, BNNK, Hospital, BNNP, TNI (Indonesian Army), Social
V
Perpus
takaa
n The survey shows that the most appropriate activity to deliver P4GN
Perpus
takaa
n The survey shows that the most appropriate activity to deliver P4GN program according to students as respondents is lecture/
Perpus
takaa
n program according to students as respondents is lecture/counselling. The detail percentage is as follow:
Perpus
takaa
n counselling. The detail percentage is as follow:
1) Lecture/counseling: 1,857 (35.7%) respondents.
Perpus
takaa
n
1) Lecture/counseling: 1,857 (35.7%) respondents.2) Interactive discussion/dialogue: 399 (7.70%) respondents.
Perpus
takaa
n
2) Interactive discussion/dialogue: 399 (7.70%) respondents.
Perpus
takaa
n
respondents
Perpus
takaa
n
respondents
Perpus
takaa
n
4) Seminar/workshop: 478 (9,20%) respondents.
Perpus
takaa
n
4) Seminar/workshop: 478 (9,20%) respondents.5) Training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company: Perp
ustak
aan
5) Training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company: 779 (15%) respondents.Perp
ustak
aan
779 (15%) respondents.
BNN
82 Prevalence Survey 2018
Graphic 22. P4GN Program Implementing Agency According to Student Respondents
5.2. P4GN Program among Workers
5.2.1. Knowledge on P4GN Program
From the total 5,200 worker respondents surveyed in 13 cities in Indonesia, all of them has seen or heard about drugs prevention promotion. From 93 narcotics user-workers, 86.10% has seen or heard about P4GN. From 4,420 non drugs user-workers, 86.80% has never seen or heard about drugs prevention promotion. The rest answers “do not know”.
Based on the survey, BNN as the institution which gives drugs prevention activity is known by 76.20% respondents. Other institutions which carry out P4GN program beside BNN are the police (69.605),
(38.00%), Indonesian Army (38.705), company (38.605), social services
The Police
BNN
Public Health Office
School/University
BNNKHospital
BNNP
TNI
Social Service Office
MUI, etc
NGO
Regional Service Office
Manpower Office
79%77%
74%71%
63%
63%61%
40%
39%39%
36%
31%
21%
63%
63%61%
79%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
5.2. P4GN Program among Workers
Perpus
takaa
n
5.2. P4GN Program among Workers
5.2.1. Knowledge on P4GN Program
Perpus
takaa
n
5.2.1. Knowledge on P4GN Program
From the total 5,200 worker respondents surveyed in 13 cities in Perpus
takaa
n
From the total 5,200 worker respondents surveyed in 13 cities in Indonesia, all of them has seen or heard about drugs prevention
Perpus
takaa
n
Indonesia, all of them has seen or heard about drugs prevention
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Perpus
takaa
n 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
BNNBNN
83Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 33Implementing Agency of P4GN Program
According to Drug Users and Non-Drug User Workers
Sumber : Survei Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba, 2018
The most appropriate activity of drugs prevention program according to workers is lecture or counselling (39.90%), anti narcotics campaign (13.20%), interactive discussion or dialog (11.30%), anti
sports activity (8.70%), seminar or workshop (8.00%), and training as a member of the anti-drug Task Force in the company (7.20%).
Institutions conducting
drug preventions
Using drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs Total
N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %
BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%BNN (National Narcotic Board) 83 76.90% 3,878 76.20% 3,961 76.20%
BNNP (Provincial-National Narcotic
Board)64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%64 59.30% 3,092 60.70% 3,156 60.70%
BNNK (Municipal-National Narcotic
Board)63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%
Health office 57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%
Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%
Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%
Regional Office of Religion
affairs25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%
Social services Office 40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%
Manpower office 31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%
Non-governmental organization 41 38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%38.00% 1,935 38.00% 1,976 38.00%
hospital 54 50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%50.00% 2,701 53.00% 2,755 53%
Religious organization 33Religious organization 33Religious organization 33 30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%30.60% 1,910 37.50% 1,943 37.40%
Company 45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%45 41.70% 1,964 38.60% 2,009 38.60%
others 1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%1 3.70% 137 12.30% 138 12.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%
Perpus
takaa
n Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%
Perpus
takaa
n Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%
Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%
Perpus
takaa
n Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%
Perpus
takaa
n Indonesian National Army 45 41.70% 1,965 38.60% 2,010 38.70%
25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%
Perpus
takaa
n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%
Perpus
takaa
n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%
Perpus
takaa
n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%
Perpus
takaa
n 25 23.10% 1,498 29.40% 1,523 29.30%
40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%
Perpus
takaa
n
40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%
Perpus
takaa
n
40 37.00% 1,929 37.90% 1.969 37.90%
31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%
Perpus
takaa
n
31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%
Perpus
takaa
n
31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%
Perpus
takaa
n
31 28.70% 1,527 30.00% 1,558 30.00%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Non-governmental organization 41
Perpus
takaa
n
Non-governmental organization 41Non-governmental organization 41
Perpus
takaa
n
Non-governmental organization 41
Religious organization 33Perpus
takaa
n
Religious organization 33
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%
BNN63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%
BNN63 58.30% 3,021 63,60% 3,294 59.30%
57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%BNN57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%BNN57 52.80% 3,237 63.60% 3,294 63.30%
Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%BNNIndonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%Indonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%BNNIndonesian National Police 68 63.00% 3,553 69.80% 3,621 69.60%
84 Prevalence Survey 2018
Table 34 The Most Effective Program for Drugs Prevention According to Workers
The most effective activitiesUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs TotalUsing drugs Not using drugs Total
N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %N % N % N %
Lecture/counseling 45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%45 41.70% 2,031 39.90% 2,076 39.90%
Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%Interactive discussion/dialog 11 10.20% 576 11.30% 587 11.30%
anti-drug film/ performance/
concert13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%13 12.00% 529 10.40% 542 10.40%
Seminar/ workshop 9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%9 8.30% 407 8.00% 416 8.00%
Anti-drug Taskforce training in the
company
Anti-drug campaign 8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%
Joint Sport activity 11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%
others 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%
Perpus
takaa
n 11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%
Perpus
takaa
n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%
Perpus
takaa
n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%
Perpus
takaa
n 0 0.00% 56 1.10% 56 1.10%
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%
BNN8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%
BNN8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%
BNN8 7.40% 680 13.40% 688 13.20%
11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%BNN11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%BNN11 10.20% 440 8.60% 451 8.70%
85
CLOSING
VI
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
86
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
87Prevalence Survey 2018
CLOSING
6.1 Summary
1. The survey on student and university student shows that the majority of student and university student respondents knows about the type of natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semi-synthetic drugs, such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda), shabu, heroin and cocaine. The majority of respondents also knows non drugs-addictive substance especially headache medicine which is consumed excessively and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink. The prevalence rate of current user-students and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492.
2. The prevalence rate of current user-workers in 13 capitals of provinces is 2.10%. This prevalence rate is slightly declining compared to the prevalence rate in 2017 of 2.90%. Based on gender, drug users are dominated by male. Drug user among workers is not limited to gender since both male and female workers have become drug users.
3. 3. Based on the survey of sources to obtain drugs, marijuana (10.405) and shabu (8.005) should be taken into attention since they are relatively easy and very easy to be obtained in working place. It can be concluded that working place is a place of drugs transaction and drugs abuse.
4. The research shows that only 92 households of which the members are exposed to drugs. The total household members exposed to drugs are 102.
VI
Perpus
takaa
n majority of student and university student respondents knows
Perpus
takaa
n majority of student and university student respondents knows about the type of natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semi-synthetic
Perpus
takaa
n about the type of natural drugs, synthetic drugs and semi-synthetic drugs, such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda),
Perpus
takaa
n drugs, such as marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda), shabu, heroin and cocaine. The majority of respondents also knows
Perpus
takaa
n shabu, heroin and cocaine. The majority of respondents also knows non drugs-addictive substance especially headache medicine
Perpus
takaa
n non drugs-addictive substance especially headache medicine which is consumed excessively and headache medicine which is
Perpus
takaa
n
which is consumed excessively and headache medicine which is mixed with soda drink. The prevalence rate of current user-students
Perpus
takaa
n
mixed with soda drink. The prevalence rate of current user-students and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492.
Perpus
takaa
n
and university students is 3.2% or equivalent to 2,297,492. 2. The prevalence rate of current user-workers in 13 capitals of
Perpus
takaa
n
2. The prevalence rate of current user-workers in 13 capitals of provinces is 2.10%. This prevalence rate is slightly declining Perp
ustak
aan
provinces is 2.10%. This prevalence rate is slightly declining Perpus
takaa
n
compared to the prevalence rate in 2017 of 2.90%. Based on gender, Perpus
takaa
n
compared to the prevalence rate in 2017 of 2.90%. Based on gender, drug users are dominated by male. Drug user among workers is not
Perpus
takaa
n
drug users are dominated by male. Drug user among workers is not
BNN1. The survey on student and university student shows that the BNN1. The survey on student and university student shows that the
majority of student and university student respondents knows BNNmajority of student and university student respondents knows
88 Prevalence Survey 2018
5. Type of drugsmostly consumed by household member respondents is methamphetamine, such as shabu, tastus and ubas. The number of household members who consume this type of drug is 43.1% from the total 102 members. Another type of drugs consumed by household members is marijuana of 25.5%.
6.2 Recommendation
Several recommendations to prevent drugs among students/university students, workers and households are:1. The need of special supervison on drugs-prone places, such as:
nightclubs massage place (beauty shop and sauna), coffee shop, billyard palce, internet cafe, hotel/apartment/low cost apartment, restaurant, boarding house/dormitory, school/campus, working places, street alleys.
2. Information-sharing or socialization for certain professions that are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender, masseuse, DJ, capster, billyard guide, night shift worker, cruiser.
3. Information-sharing or socialization on the impact of drugs abuse should be encouraged in household.
4. In order to protect household members from drugs abuse, heads of household are suggested to conduct these activities:
Involving household members in drug prevention activitiesSpending time together with household members Knowing members’ close friendsKnowing household members’ behavior outside the houseConsistenly prohibiting household members from smoking Consistenly prohibiting household members from drinking alcoholProhibiting household members from visiting nightclubs, staying up late or hanging out
6.2.1 Prevention
1. Advising boarding house owner and local people to increase the supervision to boarding house occupants by involving community
Perpus
takaa
n are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender,
Perpus
takaa
n are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender, masseuse, DJ, capster, billyard guide, night shift worker, cruiser.
Perpus
takaa
n masseuse, DJ, capster, billyard guide, night shift worker, cruiser.3. Information-sharing or socialization on the impact of drugs abuse
Perpus
takaa
n 3. Information-sharing or socialization on the impact of drugs abuse
should be encouraged in household.
Perpus
takaa
n should be encouraged in household.
4. In order to protect household members from drugs abuse, heads of
Perpus
takaa
n 4. In order to protect household members from drugs abuse, heads of
household are suggested to conduct these activities:
Perpus
takaa
n
household are suggested to conduct these activities:Involving household members in drug prevention activities
Perpus
takaa
n
Involving household members in drug prevention activitiesSpending time together with household members
Perpus
takaa
n
Spending time together with household members Knowing members’ close friends
Perpus
takaa
n
Knowing members’ close friendsKnowing household members’ behavior outside the housePerp
ustak
aan
Knowing household members’ behavior outside the housePerpus
takaa
n
Consistenly prohibiting household members from smoking Perpus
takaa
n
Consistenly prohibiting household members from smoking
BNNbillyard palce, internet cafe, hotel/apartment/low cost apartment,
BNNbillyard palce, internet cafe, hotel/apartment/low cost apartment, restaurant, boarding house/dormitory, school/campus, working
BNNrestaurant, boarding house/dormitory, school/campus, working
2. Information-sharing or socialization for certain professions that BNN2. Information-sharing or socialization for certain professions that
are most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender, BNNare most likely to abuse drugs, such as song guide, bartender,
89Prevalence Survey 2018
2. Cooperation with school/university in increasing the supervision in hang out places visited oftenly by students or university students.
3. Advising school/university to monitor students or university students indicated as drugs users..
4. Conducting information sharing or socialization to the society that drugs user is not a ‘disgrace’ to the family, but a patient who needs a medication or rehabilitation to recover them from drug addiction
6.2.2 Community Empowerment
1. Increasing raids in boarding houses by involving the community.2. Increasing the empowerment of anti-drugs task force and
community to jointly supervise hang out places in the community environment.
3. Increasing the role of parents and teachers in giving accompaniment to ex-drug addicts to come back to the community and school/university and not to use drugs again (relaps).
6.2.3 Rehabilitation
1. Information sharing or socialization on the existence of rehabilitation center by forming network between BNN – School/University – Rehabilitation Center.
2. The involvement of school or university in Integrated Assesment Team in drugs abuse case by students or university students. The
rehabilitated to save their future. Perpus
takaa
n university and not to use drugs again (relaps).
Perpus
takaa
n university and not to use drugs again (relaps).
1. Information sharing or socialization on the existence of rehabilitation
Perpus
takaa
n 1. Information sharing or socialization on the existence of rehabilitation
center by forming network between BNN – School/University –
Perpus
takaa
n
center by forming network between BNN – School/University – Rehabilitation Center.
Perpus
takaa
n
Rehabilitation Center.2. The involvement of school or university in Integrated Assesment
Perpus
takaa
n
2. The involvement of school or university in Integrated Assesment Team in drugs abuse case by students or university students. The
Perpus
takaa
n
Team in drugs abuse case by students or university students. The
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
rehabilitated to save their future. Perpus
takaa
n
rehabilitated to save their future.
BNNcommunity to jointly supervise hang out places in the community
BNNcommunity to jointly supervise hang out places in the community
3. Increasing the role of parents and teachers in giving accompaniment
BNN3. Increasing the role of parents and teachers in giving accompaniment
BNNto ex-drug addicts to come back to the community and school/BNNto ex-drug addicts to come back to the community and school/university and not to use drugs again (relaps).BNNuniversity and not to use drugs again (relaps).
90 Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
91
LIST OF ABBREVIATION & LIST OF RESEARCHERS
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNNLIST OF ABBREVIATION &
BNNLIST OF ABBREVIATION & LIST OF RESEARCHERSBNNLIST OF RESEARCHERS
92
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
93Prevalence Survey 2018 93Prevalence Survey 2018
List of Abbreviation
ARQ : Annual Report Questionnaire is an Annual Development Report on Drugs Abuse
Babinsa : Bintara Pembina Desa Functioning to carry out coaching and having the main
as well Supervision of Defense and Security facilities and infrastructure at villages.
Bhabinkamtib- : Bhayangkara Pembina Keamanan dan Ketertiban mas Masyarakat. In charge of conducting community coaching, early detection and mediation/negotiation to create conducive conditionsin the village
BNN : Badan Narkotika Nasional a non-ministerial government agency in Indonesia
BNNP : Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Organization (BNN)
BNNK : Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten/Kota a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Organization (BNN)
CND : Commission on Narcotic Drugs a decision-making body under UNODC
DAINAP : Drug Abuse Information Network for Asia and
reported quarterly and annually
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN : Badan Narkotika Nasional
Perpus
takaa
n BNN : Badan Narkotika Nasional a non-ministerial government agency in Indonesia
Perpus
takaa
n a non-ministerial government agency in Indonesia
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
BNNP : Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi
Perpus
takaa
n
BNNP : Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency
Perpus
takaa
n
a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Organization (BNN)
Perpus
takaa
n
Organization (BNN)
BNNK : Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten/KotaPerpus
takaa
n
BNNK : Badan Narkotika Nasional Kabupaten/Kota a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency Perp
ustak
aan
a vertical agency of the National Narcotics Agency
BNNBNN In charge of conducting community coaching, early
BNN In charge of conducting community coaching, early detection and mediation/negotiation to create
BNN detection and mediation/negotiation to create conducive conditionsin the villageBNN conducive conditionsin the village
94 Prevalence Survey 201894 Prevalence Survey 2018
Dinsos : Dinas Sosial Agency that helps the Regent carrying out
Disnaker : Dinas Tenaga Kerja
Kanwil Agama : Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Agama
LAPAS : Lembaga Permasyarakatan A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional students in Indonesia
LSM : Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat Non governmental organization, An organization founded by individuals or a group of people who volunteered to provide services to the public
MUI : Majelis Ulama Indonesia An institution that facilitates Islamic scholars, zuama, and intellectuals in Indonesia to guide, foster and nurture Muslims throughout Indonesia
NPS : New Psychoactive Substances Drug abuse, whether in pure or mixed form, which is not controlled by the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotics Drug or the 1971 Convention on Psychotripic Substances but which poses a public health threat.
List of Abbreviation
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional
Perpus
takaa
n A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional
LSM : Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat
Perpus
takaa
n LSM : Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat
Non governmental organization, An organization
Perpus
takaa
n Non governmental organization, An organization
founded by individuals or a group of people who
Perpus
takaa
n
founded by individuals or a group of people who volunteered to provide services to the public
Perpus
takaa
n
volunteered to provide services to the public
Perpus
takaa
n
MUI : Majelis Ulama IndonesiaPerpus
takaa
n
MUI : Majelis Ulama Indonesia An institution that facilitates Islamic scholars, zuama, Perp
ustak
aan
An institution that facilitates Islamic scholars, zuama, and intellectuals in Indonesia to guide, foster and
Perpus
takaa
n
and intellectuals in Indonesia to guide, foster and
BNNBNNBNNBNN
A place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional BNNA place to conduct coaching of inmates and correctional
95Prevalence Survey 2018 95Prevalence Survey 2018
List of Abbreviation
P4GN : Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan, Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba (Prevention and
PPK UI : Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia Health Research Center of University of Indonesia
RS : Rumah Sakit (Hospital) A professional health care institution of which the services are provided by doctors, nurses, and other health professionals.
RT : Rumah Tangga (Household) The division of territory in Indonesia under the Neighborhood.
SATGAS Anti Narkoba : Satuan Tugas Anti Narkoba (Anti-drugs Task Force)
SMA : Sekolah Menengah Atas (Senior High School) Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal education after graduating from Junior High School (or equivalent)
SMP : Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Junior High School) Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal education after graduating from elementary school
TAT : Tim Asesmen Terpadu (Integrated Assesment Team) is an assessment and medical analysis, psychosocial, and therapy and rehabilitation plan recommendation for someone who has been arrested and/or red-handed in
TNI : Tentara Nasional Indonesia Indonesian national army
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Satuan Tugas Anti Narkoba (Anti-drugs Task Force)
Perpus
takaa
n Satuan Tugas Anti Narkoba (Anti-drugs Task Force)
SMA : Sekolah Menengah Atas (Senior High School)
Perpus
takaa
n SMA : Sekolah Menengah Atas (Senior High School)
Is a level of secondary education in
Perpus
takaa
n
Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal education after graduating from
Perpus
takaa
n
Indonesia formal education after graduating from Junior High School (or equivalent)
Perpus
takaa
n
Junior High School (or equivalent)
SMP : Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Junior High School)Perpus
takaa
n
SMP : Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Junior High School) Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal Perp
ustak
aan
Is a level of secondary education in Indonesia formal
BNNBNN The division of territory in Indonesia under
BNN The division of territory in Indonesia under
96 Prevalence Survey 201896 Prevalence Survey 2018
List of Researchers
List of Researchers
1. Drs. Heru Winarko, S.H.2. Drs. Adhi Prawoto, S.H.3. Drs. Agus Irianto, S.H., M.Si., M.H.4. Drs. Endang Mulyani, M.Si5. Siti Nurlela Marliani, SP, S.H, M.Si6. Dwi Sulistyorini, S.Si., M.Si7. Sri Lestari, S.Kom., M.Si8. Sri Haryanti, S.Sos, M.Si9. Novita Sari, S.Sos., M.H.10. Erma Antasari, S.Si11. Ranny Febriani, A.Md12. Quazar Noor Azhim, A.Md13. Suryaman, S.Kom14. Sri Indarsih, S.Kom15. Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi16. Tri Sugiharto, S.Kom
1. Dr. Sri Sunarti Purwaningsih2. Drs. Masyhuri Imron.,MA3. Prof. Dr. Dwi Purwoko, M.Si 4. Drs. Ary Wahyono, M.Sc5. Dr. Robert Siburian, SE., M.Si6. Dr. Fadjri Alihar7. Drs. Suprihadi8. Dr. M. Alie Humaedi, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.Hum9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si 10. Drs Aziz Suganda SH., M.Si11. Drs. Agus Santoso12. Drs. Sudiyono
14. Drs. Ujud Tahajuddin, MBA15. Drs. Bayu Setiawan, MPS.,MA 16. Drs. M. Azzam Manan, MA17. Fanny Henry Tondo, M. Hum 18. Devi Asiati, SE., MS 19. Usman S. , S.Ag.,MA20. Dr. Laely Nurhidayah, SH., LLM21. Lamijo, S.S., M.Phil22. 23. Jane K. Propiana, SKM., M.Kes24. 25. Radot Manalu, S.Sos26. Muhammad Saifullah Rohman, S.S., MA 27. Dede Wardiat, M.Si28. Luis Feneteruma, SH29. Djoko Kristijanto, S.Sos30. Hermadi
Perpus
takaa
n
15. Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi
Perpus
takaa
n
15. Rizky Purnamasari, S.Psi
9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si
Perpus
takaa
n 9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si 10. Drs Aziz Suganda SH., M.Si
Perpus
takaa
n 10. Drs Aziz Suganda SH., M.Si11. Drs. Agus Santoso
Perpus
takaa
n 11. Drs. Agus Santoso12. Drs. Sudiyono
Perpus
takaa
n 12. Drs. Sudiyono13.
Perpus
takaa
n 13.
Perpus
takaa
n
14. Drs. Ujud Tahajuddin, MBA
Perpus
takaa
n
14. Drs. Ujud Tahajuddin, MBA15. Drs. Bayu Setiawan, MPS.,MA
Perpus
takaa
n
15. Drs. Bayu Setiawan, MPS.,MA
BNN4. Drs. Ary Wahyono, M.Sc
BNN4. Drs. Ary Wahyono, M.Sc5. Dr. Robert Siburian, SE., M.Si
BNN5. Dr. Robert Siburian, SE., M.Si6. Dr. Fadjri Alihar
BNN6. Dr. Fadjri Alihar7. Drs. Suprihadi
BNN7. Drs. Suprihadi
BNN8. Dr. M. Alie Humaedi, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.HumBNN8. Dr. M. Alie Humaedi, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.Hum9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si BNN9. Dra. DTP. Kusumawardhani, M.Si
97
APPENDICES, EPILOGUEBIBLIOGRAPHY
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BIBLIOGRAPHY
Perpus
takaa
n BIBLIOGRAPHYBNNAPPENDICES, EPILOGUE
BNNAPPENDICES, EPILOGUEBIBLIOGRAPHYBNNBIBLIOGRAPHY
98
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
99Prevalence Survey 2018 99Prevalence Survey 2018
Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues Due to Drug Abuse (%)
Drug abuse impact Junior high
school
Senior high
school
University TotalUniversity Total
Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10
Difficulty to get job 64.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.8064.80 74.20 82.40 74.80
Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40
spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10spending the saving 68.50 77.60 85.30 78.10
Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00Wasting family’s properties 67.20 75.60 82.60 76.00
Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70Selling personal asset 68.20 75.60 83.70 75.70
spending on cost due to law process 68.20 76.60 84.60 77.4068.20 76.60 84.60 77.4068.20 76.60 84.60 77.4068.20 76.60 84.60 77.40
adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80adding Debt 64.40 74.90 81.80 74.80
conducting crime (stealing , robbing) 68.20 76.90 84.70 77.6068.20 76.90 84.70 77.6068.20 76.90 84.70 77.6068.20 76.90 84.70 77.60
Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30Being drug courier 64.60 74.20 81.20 74.30
Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10Immoral act 56.20 68.80 78.20 69.10
Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60Others 4.40 5.60 6.40 5.60
Appendix 1 Distribution of Respondents According to Types of Drugs and Province, 2018 (%)
Province
Potent
medi-
cine
Addic-
tive sub-
stances
Psycho-
tropic
Natural
drug
Synthetic
drug
Semi-
synthetic
drug
Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50Aceh 80.30 76.80 65.00 23.00 66.00 55.50
North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50North Sumatera 80.80 81.80 68.80 29.30 64.00 54.50
South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00South Sumatera 76.50 82.30 61.30 31.80 75.50 59.00
Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80Riau Islands 74.30 76.80 68.50 29.80 62.50 65.80
Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30Jakarta 77.50 77.00 64.80 38.00 63.80 71.30
West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80West Java 81.50 83.50 75.30 31.30 73.80 73.80
East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80
DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30
Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30
East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50
West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50
South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30
Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30
Appendices
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50
Perpus
takaa
n East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50
Perpus
takaa
n East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50
West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50
Perpus
takaa
n West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50
Perpus
takaa
n West Kalimantan 72.50 75.50 62.80 29.50 61.00 63.50
South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30
Perpus
takaa
n South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30
Perpus
takaa
n South Sulawesi 65.00 64.30 50.50 17.80 58.80 74.30
Perpus
takaa
n Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues
Perpus
takaa
n Appendix 2 Distribution of Students’ Knowledge on Issues Due to Drug Abuse (%)
Perpus
takaa
n
Due to Drug Abuse (%)
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Drug abuse impact Junior high
Perpus
takaa
n
Drug abuse impact Junior high Drug abuse impact Junior high
Perpus
takaa
n
Drug abuse impact Junior high
Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10
Perpus
takaa
n
Education continuity 63.90 74.50 83.50 75.10
get jobPerpus
takaa
n
get job
Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Perp
ustak
aan
Family burden 71.70 79.20 85.00 79.40Perp
ustak
aan
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30
Perpus
takaa
n Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30
Perpus
takaa
n Papua 76.00 68.00 63.50 24.30 68.00 64.30
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
East java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80
BNNEast java 78.00 76.80 68.80 68.50 64.00 66.80
DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30
BNNDI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30DI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30
BNNDI Yogyakarta 84.80 83.80 77.50 62.00 73.30 74.30
Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30
BNNBali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30Bali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30
BNNBali 86.30 88.00 75.50 50.00 49.30 55.30
East Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50BNNEast Kalimantan 73.30 78.80 59.30 40.30 59.50 63.50
100 Prevalence Survey 2018100 Prevalence Survey 2018
Appendices
APPENDIX 3 Distribution of Perception on the Attitude Toward Drug Abuse According to the Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%)
Responds Junior high
school
Senior high
school
University TotalUniversity Total
Respond when someone dealing drug in school or campus
Keep silent 5.50 9.00 10.30 8.605.50 9.00 10.30 8.605.50 9.00 10.30 8.605.50 9.00 10.30 8.60
Advising 15.70 25.00 28.70 24.0015.70 25.00 28.70 24.0015.70 25.00 28.70 24.0015.70 25.00 28.70 24.00
Reporting to school or campus staff 41.00 39.20 29.80 36.2041.00 39.20 29.80 36.2041.00 39.20 29.80 36.2041.00 39.20 29.80 36.20
Reporting to the police 36.40 24.60 28.00 28.0036.40 24.60 28.00 28.0036.40 24.60 28.00 28.0036.40 24.60 28.00 28.00
Others 1.40 2.20 3.20 2.401.40 2.20 3.20 2.401.40 2.20 3.20 2.401.40 2.20 3.20 2.40
Reaction when offered to buy drug
Refusing 98.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.30
Accepting 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.30
Being doubtful 1.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.401.60 1.60 1.20 4.40
Reaction when offered drug for free
Refusing 98.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.60
Accepting 0.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.80
Being doubtful 1.70 1.70 1.40 1.601.70 1.70 1.40 1.601.70 1.70 1.40 1.601.70 1.70 1.40 1.60
Reaction when asked to give drug to others
Refusing 97,90 98,00 98,70 98,2097,90 98,00 98,70 98,2097,90 98,00 98,70 98,2097,90 98,00 98,70 98,20
Accepting 0,30 0,30 0,20 0,300,30 0,30 0,20 0,300,30 0,30 0,20 0,300,30 0,30 0,20 0,30
Being doubtful 1,80 1,70 1,20 1,501,80 1,70 1,20 1,501,80 1,70 1,20 1,501,80 1,70 1,20 1,50
Reaction when asked to selling drug to others
Refusing 98,40 98,30 98,80 98,5098,40 98,30 98,80 98,5098,40 98,30 98,80 98,5098,40 98,30 98,80 98,50
Accepting 0,20 0,40 0,20 0,300,20 0,40 0,20 0,300,20 0,40 0,20 0,300,20 0,40 0,20 0,30
Being doubtful 1,40 1,40 1,00 1,201,40 1,40 1,00 1,201,40 1,40 1,00 1,201,40 1,40 1,00 1,20
Reaction when someone using drug in school or campus
Keep silent 5,20 8,20 8,70 7,605,20 8,20 8,70 7,605,20 8,20 8,70 7,605,20 8,20 8,70 7,60
Advising 20,30 32,30 36,90 30,9020,30 32,30 36,90 30,9020,30 32,30 36,90 30,9020,30 32,30 36,90 30,90
Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40Reporting to school or campus staff 16,60 18,40 17,00 17,40
Reporting to the police 55,10 37,70 33,90 40,7055,10 37,70 33,90 40,7055,10 37,70 33,90 40,7055,10 37,70 33,90 40,70
Others 2,90 3,50 3,50 3,302,90 3,50 3,50 3,302,90 3,50 3,50 3,302,90 3,50 3,50 3,30
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40
Perpus
takaa
n 1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40
98.10 97.40 97.60 97.60
Perpus
takaa
n 98.10 97.40 97.60 97.6098.10 97.40 97.60 97.60
Perpus
takaa
n 98.10 97.40 97.60 97.60
0.20 1.00 1.10 0.80
Perpus
takaa
n 0.20 1.00 1.10 0.800.20 1.00 1.10 0.80
Perpus
takaa
n 0.20 1.00 1.10 0.80
1.70 1.70 1.40 1.60
Perpus
takaa
n
1.70 1.70 1.40 1.60
Reaction when asked to give drug to others
Perpus
takaa
n
Reaction when asked to give drug to others
Reaction when asked to selling drug to othersPerp
ustak
aan
Reaction when asked to selling drug to others
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN98.30 98.10 98.50 98.30
BNN98.30 98.10 98.50 98.3098.30 98.10 98.50 98.30
BNN98.30 98.10 98.50 98.30
0.10 0.40 0.40 0.30BNN0.10 0.40 0.40 0.300.10 0.40 0.40 0.30BNN0.10 0.40 0.40 0.30
1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40BNN1.60 1.60 1.20 4.40
101Prevalence Survey 2018 101Prevalence Survey 2018
APPENDIX 4 Respondents’ Knowledge on Social Impact From Drug Abuse (%)
Appendices
Social Impact Yes No TotalYes No TotalYes No TotalYes No Total
Friendship
a. Shunned 53.0% 12.0% 35.0%53.0% 12.0% 35.0%53.0% 12.0% 35.0%53.0% 12.0% 35.0%
b. Bullied 31.3% 25.0% 43.7%31.3% 25.0% 43.7%31.3% 25.0% 43.7%
c. Hostile 32.8% 24.8% 42.4%32.8% 24.8% 42.4%32.8% 24.8% 42.4%32.8% 24.8% 42.4%
d. Ostracized 38.8% 20.9% 40.3%38.8% 20.9% 40.3%38.8% 20.9% 40.3%
Friends other than office mate
a. Shunned 51.3% 11.3% 37.4%51.3% 11.3% 37.4%51.3% 11.3% 37.4%51.3% 11.3% 37.4%
b. Bullied 31.4% 23.6% 45.1%31.4% 23.6% 45.1%31.4% 23.6% 45.1%31.4% 23.6% 45.1%
c. Hostile 32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%
d. Ostracized 37.9% 19.6% 42.5%37.9% 19.6% 42.5%37.9% 19.6% 42.5%
Relationship with family or relatives
a. Shunned 41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%41.4% 22.0% 36.6%
b. Bullied 27.8% 29.7% 42.5%27.8% 29.7% 42.5%27.8% 29.7% 42.5%
c. Hostile 29.3% 29.3% 41.4%29.3% 29.3% 41.4%29.3% 29.3% 41.4%29.3% 29.3% 41.4%
d. Ostracized 34.2% 25.7% 40.1%34.2% 25.7% 40.1%34.2% 25.7% 40.1%
Relationship in the society
a. Shunned 55.0% 10.5% 34.4%55.0% 10.5% 34.4%55.0% 10.5% 34.4%55.0% 10.5% 34.4%
b. Bullied 37.0% 21.8% 41.2%37.0% 21.8% 41.2%37.0% 21.8% 41.2%
c. Hostile 39.2% 20.6% 40.2%39.2% 20.6% 40.2%39.2% 20.6% 40.2%39.2% 20.6% 40.2%
d. Ostracized 44.6% 17.2% 38.2%44.6% 17.2% 38.2%44.6% 17.2% 38.2%Perp
ustak
aan
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 41.4% 22.0% 36.6%
Perpus
takaa
n 41.4% 22.0% 36.6%
27.8% 29.7% 42.5%
Perpus
takaa
n 27.8% 29.7% 42.5%
29.3% 29.3% 41.4%
Perpus
takaa
n 29.3% 29.3% 41.4%
Relationship in the society
Perpus
takaa
n
Relationship in the society
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
51.3% 11.3% 37.4%
BNN51.3% 11.3% 37.4%
31.4% 23.6% 45.1%
BNN31.4% 23.6% 45.1%
32.7% 23.2% 44.2%
BNN32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%
BNN32.7% 23.2% 44.2%32.7% 23.2% 44.2%
BNN32.7% 23.2% 44.2%
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNN
37.9% 19.6% 42.5%BNN37.9% 19.6% 42.5%37.9% 19.6% 42.5%BNN37.9% 19.6% 42.5%
102 Prevalence Survey 2018102 Prevalence Survey 2018
APPENDIX 5 Perception on Attitude Toward Drug Abuse According to the Level of Education Among Students and University Students (%)
Perception toward drug abuseJunior high
school
Senior high
schoolUniversity totalUniversity total
Reaction when a family member or relative uses drugs
Keep silent 3.10 3.40 2.90 3.103.10 3.40 2.90 3.103.10 3.40 2.90 3.103.10 3.40 2.90 3.10
Advising 21.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.9021.90 29.80 35.60 29.90
Forbidding 31.20 33.30 30.00 31.6031.20 33.30 30.00 31.6031.20 33.30 30.00 31.6031.20 33.30 30.00 31.60
Reporting to the police 42.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.2042.50 30.90 29.00 33.20
Others 1.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.30
Reaction when your parent use drugs
Keep silent 2.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.00
Advising 17.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.3017.10 22.40 25.90 22.30
Forbidding 43.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.10
Reporting to the police 35.50 28.70 28.90 30.5035.50 28.70 28.90 30.5035.50 28.70 28.90 30.5035.50 28.70 28.90 30.5035.50 28.70 28.90 30.50
Others 1.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.10
Reaction when your boyfriend/girlfriend uses drugs
Keep silent 1.40 1.30 1.10 1.301.40 1.30 1.10 1.301.40 1.30 1.10 1.301.40 1.30 1.10 1.30
Advising 13.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.2013.50 18.20 21.40 18.20
Forbidding 38.60 40.90 37.90 39.2038.60 40.90 37.90 39.2038.60 40.90 37.90 39.2038.60 40.90 37.90 39.20
Reporting to the police 40.30 31.00 32.00 33.7040.30 31.00 32.00 33.7040.30 31.00 32.00 33.7040.30 31.00 32.00 33.7040.30 31.00 32.00 33.70
Others 6.20 8.60 7.60 7.706.20 8.60 7.60 7.706.20 8.60 7.60 7.706.20 8.60 7.60 7.70
Appendices
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30
Perpus
takaa
n 17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30
43.10 43.50 40.10 42.10
Perpus
takaa
n 43.10 43.50 40.10 42.1043.10 43.50 40.10 42.10
Perpus
takaa
n 43.10 43.50 40.10 42.10
35.50 28.70 28.90 30.50
Perpus
takaa
n 35.50 28.70 28.90 30.5035.50 28.70 28.90 30.50
Perpus
takaa
n 35.50 28.70 28.90 30.50
1.30 3.70 3.20 3.10
Perpus
takaa
n 1.30 3.70 3.20 3.101.30 3.70 3.20 3.10
Perpus
takaa
n 1.30 3.70 3.20 3.10
Reaction when your boyfriend/girlfriend uses drugs
Perpus
takaa
n
Reaction when your boyfriend/girlfriend uses drugs
Reporting to the police Perpus
takaa
n
Reporting to the police
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN1.30 2.70 2.50 2.30
BNN1.30 2.70 2.50 2.301.30 2.70 2.50 2.30
BNN1.30 2.70 2.50 2.30
2.40 1.80 1.90 2.00BNN2.40 1.80 1.90 2.002.40 1.80 1.90 2.00BNN2.40 1.80 1.90 2.00
17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30BNN17.10 22.40 25.90 22.30
103Prevalence Survey 2018 103Prevalence Survey 2018
APPENDIX 6 Types of Consumed Drugs and the Age when Using Drugs for the First Time, 2018
Type of drug Amount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min MaxAmount % Mean Median Mode Min Max
Dextromethorphan overly
consumed
11 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 1011 6.6 16 17 17 10 10
Tramadol 17 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 1917 10.2 16 16 16 12 19
Trihexiphenidyl 11 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 1911 6.6 16 16 16 13 19
Headache medicine
excessively consumed
50 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 2050 29.9 15 15 15 10 20
Headache medicine mixed
with soda drink
21 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 1721 12.6 14 14 12 10 17
Substances inhaled
continuously (glue,
gasoline, markers, electric
mosquito,etc. )
49 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 22
Koplo pill, BK, mboat,
mboti, roda
13 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 17
Marijuana 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22
Bear tobacco, gorilla
tobacco
20 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 20
Ecstasy 8 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 19
Amphetamine
(seed, dex Adderall,
dexamphetamine)
4 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 17
Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20
Putau 3 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 193 1.8 18 17 17 17 19
Morphine 4 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 174 2.4 17 17 17 17 17
Heroin 6 3.6 17Heroin 6 3.6 17Heroin 6 3.6 17Heroin 6 3.6 17 17 17 17 1717 17 17 1717 17 17 1717 17 17 17
Cocaine 7 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 197 4.2 15 17 10 10 19
Others 8 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 188 3.6 17 17 16 16 18
Appendices
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n 13 7.8 15 16 16 12 17
Perpus
takaa
n 13 7.8 15 16 16 12 1713 7.8 15 16 16 12 17
Perpus
takaa
n 13 7.8 15 16 16 12 17
42 25.1 16 16 15 10 22
Perpus
takaa
n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22
Perpus
takaa
n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22
Perpus
takaa
n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 2242 25.1 16 16 15 10 22
Perpus
takaa
n 42 25.1 16 16 15 10 22
20 12.0 16 16 14 12 20
Perpus
takaa
n
20 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 20
Perpus
takaa
n
20 12.0 16 16 14 12 2020 12.0 16 16 14 12 20
Perpus
takaa
n
20 12.0 16 16 14 12 20
8 4.8 17 17 16 14 19
Perpus
takaa
n
8 4.8 17 17 16 14 198 4.8 17 17 16 14 19
Perpus
takaa
n
8 4.8 17 17 16 14 19
(seed, dex Adderall,
Perpus
takaa
n
(seed, dex Adderall,
dexamphetamine) Perpus
takaa
n
dexamphetamine)
4 2.4 17 17 17 17 17
Perpus
takaa
n
4 2.4 17 17 17 17 17
Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20Perp
ustak
aan
Methamphetamine 15 9.0 16 17 17 8 20
BNNBNNBNNBNNBNNBNN49 29.3 13 13 13 7 22
BNN49 29.3 13 13 13 7 2249 29.3 13 13 13 7 22
BNN49 29.3 13 13 13 7 22
104 Prevalence Survey 2018104 Prevalence Survey 2018
The data presented in this book is the result of research by BNN and LIPI. The research shows that the majority of student and university student respondents have the knowledge on the types of drugs such as natural narcotics, synthetic and semi-synthetic drugs including marijuana (gele, cimeng, marijuana, getok, linda), shabu, heroine and cocaine. The majority of respondents also have the knowledge that the misuse of addictive substances will endanger theirselves such as the excessive use of headache medicine and the use of headache medicine mixed with soda drink. The data shows that drug abuse has been known by all layers of the community, including students and university students.
The publication of this book is expected to present real facts of drug abuse and drug issues in this nation to policy maker (the government) and the community. The level of severe condition described in the continuous research is expected to increase the
of drugs.
Epilogue
Perpus
takaa
n government) and the community. The level of severe condition
Perpus
takaa
n government) and the community. The level of severe condition described in the continuous research is expected to increase the
Perpus
takaa
n described in the continuous research is expected to increase the
Perpus
takaa
n BNNThe publication of this book is expected to present real facts
BNNThe publication of this book is expected to present real facts of drug abuse and drug issues in this nation to policy maker (the BNNof drug abuse and drug issues in this nation to policy maker (the government) and the community. The level of severe condition BNNgovernment) and the community. The level of severe condition
105Prevalence Survey 2018 105Prevalence Survey 2018
Bibliography
Anggreni, Dewi. 2015. “Dampak bagi pengguna narkotika, psikotropika, dan
Dalam e-Journal Sosiatri-Sosiologi 3(3). Hlm.: 37-51.
Badan Narkotika Nasional, 2009. Advokasi Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Narkoba. Jakarta, BNNRI.Narkoba. Jakarta, BNNRI.Narkoba.
Badan Narkotika Nasional, 2016. http://lab.bnn.go.id/nps_alert_ http://lab.bnn.go.id/nps_alert_ http://lab.bnn.go.id/nps_alert_
system/12.%20 Lampiran%20zat%20NPS%20terdeteksi%20di%20system/12.%20 Lampiran%20zat%20NPS%20terdeteksi%20di%20Indonesia.php.Indonesia.php.
Badan Narkotika Nasional, Ringkasan Jurnal Data Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba (P4GN) Tahun 2015. Edisi Tahun 2016.(P4GN) Tahun 2015. Edisi Tahun 2016.(P4GN) Tahun 2015.
Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014. New psychoactive substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.Vienna, 14-22 March 2014.
David C. McClelland. (1985). Human Motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Human Motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Human Motivation.
Fremont Ellsworth Kast & James Erwin Rosenzweig. (1970). Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. New York: and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach. New York: and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach.McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Gordon, L., Tinsley, L., Godfrey, C., Parott, S. 2006. The economic and social costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004. Home costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004. Home costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004.
Haryanto, 2012. Dampak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. http://belajarpsikologi. http://belajarpsikologi.Dampak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika. http://belajarpsikologi.Dampak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika.com/dampak-penyalahgunaan-Narkotika/.com/dampak-penyalahgunaan-Narkotika/.
Kompas. 2018. “Makin Mudah Beli Narkoba”. Dalam KOMPAS, Jumat 21 KOMPAS, Jumat 21 KOMPASDesember 2018. Hlm.: 27.
Kompas. 2018. “Narkotika: Oknum Polisi Kawal Pengiriman Sabu”. Dalam KOMPAS, Jumat 21 Desember 2018. Hlm.: 21. KOMPAS, Jumat 21 Desember 2018. Hlm.: 21. KOMPAS,
Lestari, Anna Puji. 2018. “Komunikasi imun penyalahgunaan narkoba”. Dalam https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/188564/komunikasi-imun-https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/188564/komunikasi-imun-penyalahgunaan-narkoba. Akses 5 Maret 2018.penyalahgunaan-narkoba. Akses 5 Maret 2018.
Perpus
takaa
n Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014.
Perpus
takaa
n Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014.
substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.
Perpus
takaa
n substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.
Human Motivation.
Perpus
takaa
n Human Motivation.
Fremont Ellsworth Kast & James Erwin Rosenzweig. (1970).
Perpus
takaa
n
Fremont Ellsworth Kast & James Erwin Rosenzweig. (1970). and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach.
Perpus
takaa
n
and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach.McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Perpus
takaa
n
McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Gordon, L., Tinsley, L., Godfrey, C., Parott, S. 2006.
Perpus
takaa
n
Gordon, L., Tinsley, L., Godfrey, C., Parott, S. 2006. costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004.Perp
ustak
aan
costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales 2003/2004.Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
Ringkasan Jurnal Data Pencegahan dan
BNNRingkasan Jurnal Data Pencegahan dan
Pemberantasan Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba
BNNPemberantasan Penyalahgunaan dan Peredaran Gelap Narkoba
BNNCommission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014. BNNCommission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session, 2014.
substances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.BNNsubstances: overview of trends, challenges and legal approaches.
106 Prevalence Survey 2018
Mantra, I.B. 2003. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Maulana, Heri.D.J.(2009). Promosi Kesehatan,Promosi Kesehatan,Promosi Kesehatan,Jakarta: EGC
Puslitkes UI dan BNN, 2017. Laporan Akhir Survei Nasional Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017. Bagian I. Kelompok Pekerja. Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017. Bagian I. Kelompok Pekerja. Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017Jakarta Puslitkes UI.
Rahmawati, Ira. 2016. “Buwas: Pengguna Narkoba di Indonesia Meningkat hingga 5,9 Juta Orang”. Dalam https://regional.kompas.com/hingga 5,9 Juta Orang”. Dalam https://regional.kompas.com/read/2016/01/11/14313191/Buwas.Peng-guna.Narkoba.di.Indonesia.read/2016/01/11/14313191/Buwas.Peng-guna.Narkoba.di.Indonesia.Meningkat.hingga.5.9.Juta.Orang. Akses, 5 Maret 2018.Meningkat.hingga.5.9.Juta.Orang. Akses, 5 Maret 2018.
juta”. Dalam Sindonews.com edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret Sindonews.com edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret Sindonews.com2018.
Survey Nasional
Akhir). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia Akhir). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia Akhir).
Ulfah, Desi Maria. 2005. F
UNODC. 2018. World Drugs Report Tahun 2018.
Ditjen Pemasyarakatan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI, Maret 2016.
Perundangan:
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Narkotika,
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Psikotropika,
106 Prevalence Survey 2018
Mantra, I.B. 2003. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Maulana, Heri.D.J.(2009). Promosi Kesehatan,Jakarta: EGC
Puslitkes UI dan BNN, 2017. Laporan Akhir Survei Nasional Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017. Bagian I. Kelompok Pekerja.7Jakarta Puslitkes UI.
Rahmawati, Ira. 2016. “Buwas: Pengguna Narkoba di Indonesia Meningkat hingga 5,9 Juta Orang”. Dalam https://regional.kompas.com/p // g p /read/2016/01/11/14313191/Buwas.Peng-guna.Narkoba.di.Indonesia./ / / / / g gMeningkat.hingga.5.9.Juta.Orang. Akses, 5 Maret 2018.g gg g ,
Satibi, M. 2013. “BNN perkirakan 2015 jumlah pengguna narkotika capai 5,1 juta”. Dalam Sindonews.com edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret m2018.
Sucahya, Purwa Kurnia dan kawan-kawan. 2017.Survey Nasional Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017 (Laporan Akhir). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesiadisampaikan kepada Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Ulfah, Desi Maria. 2005. Faktor-Faktor Penggunaan Minuman Keras Di Kalangan Remaja Di Desa Losari Kecamatan Rembang Kabupaten Purbalingga.Skripsi untuk memperoleh gelar Sarjana Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan pada Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Jurusan Hukum danKewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Semarang.
UNODC, 2016. World Drugs Report Tahun 2016.
UNODC. 2018. World Drugs Report Tahun 2018.
Ditjen Pemasyarakatan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI, Maret 2016.
Perundangan:
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang PerubahanPenggolongan Narkotika,
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang PerubahanPenggolongan Psikotropika,
Bibliography
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n a, Purwa Kurnia dan kawan-kawan. 2017
Perpus
takaa
n a, Purwa Kurnia dan kawan-kawan. 2017
Perpus
takaa
n Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017 (Laporan
Perpus
takaa
n Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di 34 Provinsi Tahun 2017 (Laporan
Perpus
takaa
n Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia
Perpus
takaa
n Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia
Perpus
takaa
n ada Badan Narkotika Nasional Re
Perpus
takaa
n ada Badan Narkotika Nasional Re
Perpus
takaa
n
aktor-Faktor Penggunaan Minuman Keras Di Kalangan
Perpus
takaa
n
aktor-Faktor Penggunaan Minuman Keras Di Kalangan
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
Remaja Di Desa Losari Kecamatan Rembang Kabupaten Purbalingga.
Perpus
takaa
n
Remaja Di Desa Losari Kecamatan Rembang Kabupaten Purbalingga.
Perpus
takaa
n
kripsi untuk memperoleh
Perpus
takaa
n
kripsi untuk memperoleh
Perpus
takaa
n
araan pada Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Jurusan Hukum dan
Perpus
takaa
n
araan pada Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Jurusan Hukum dan
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
ane
Perpus
takaa
n
aneg
Perpus
takaa
n
garaan Universitas Ne
Perpus
takaa
n
araan Universitas Ne
Perpus
takaa
n
Perpus
takaa
n
UNODC, 2016. World DruPerpus
takaa
n
UNODC, 2016. World Dru
BNNBNNBNNBNNuna narkotika capai 5,1
BNNuna narkotika capai 5,1
BNN edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret
BNN edisi Selasa, 4 Juni 2013. Akses 5 Maret
107Prevalence Survey 2018 107Prevalence Survey 2018
Bibliography
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 57 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Narkotika,
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 58 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan Penggolongan Psikotropika
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2025
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik
Website:
http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html Akses pada tanggal 11 Desember 2018.
https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.
https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.
https://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-https://news.idntimes.com/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjang-tahun-2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/full Akses pada tanggal 10 2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/full Akses pada tanggal 10 November 2018.
https://news.okezone.com/read/2017/07/20/337/1740743/https://news.okezone.com/read/2017/07/20/337/1740743/mencengangkan-pecandu-narkoba-di-indonesia-tembus-6-juta-mencengangkan-pecandu-narkoba-di-indonesia-tembus-6-juta-orang. Akses pada tanggal 11 November 2018.orang. Akses pada tanggal 11 November 2018.
https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/tahun-2017-jumlah-pengguna-https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/tahun-2017-jumlah-pengguna-narkoba-di-kalangan-pelajar-surabaya-meningkat.html Akses pada narkoba-di-kalangan-pelajar-surabaya-meningkat.html Akses pada tanggal 21 Desember 2018.
Perpus
takaa
n http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html
Perpus
takaa
n http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html
Perpus
takaa
n http://sosiologimuchibbur.blogspot.co.id/2013/01/sosiologi-keluarga.html
Perpus
takaa
n Akses pada tanggal 11 Desember 2018.
Perpus
takaa
n Akses pada tanggal 11 Desember 2018.
https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-
Perpus
takaa
n https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-
Perpus
takaa
n https://majalahqalam.wordpress.com/artikel-2/artikel-keluarga/dampak-
narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember
Perpus
takaa
n
narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember
Perpus
takaa
n
narkoba-bagi-lingkungan-keluarga/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember
https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-
Perpus
takaa
n
https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-
Perpus
takaa
n
https://marhenyantoz.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses
Perpus
takaa
n
penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses
Perpus
takaa
n
penyalahgunaan-narkoba-dampak-penyalahgunaan-narkoba/ Akses pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.Perp
ustak
aan
pada tanggal 18 Desember 2018.
BNNUndang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika
BNNUndang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1997 tentang Psikotropika
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik
BNNUndang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik
108 Prevalence Survey 2018108 Prevalence Survey 2018
Malaysia”. Dalam https://m.liputan6.co. Akses pada tanggal 21 Malaysia”. Dalam https://m.liputan6.co. Akses pada tanggal 21 Desember 2018.
http://jakarta.tribunnews.com/2018/12/20/sepanjang-tahun-2018-bnn-http://jakarta.tribunnews.com/2018/12/20/sepanjang-tahun-2018-bnn-ungkap-914-kasus-narkoba-dan-tangkap-1355-tersangka#gref Akses ungkap-914-kasus-narkoba-dan-tangkap-1355-tersangka#gref Akses pada tanggal 12 Januari 2019.
http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2018/12/19/jumlah-napi-dan-http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2018/12/19/jumlah-napi-dan-tahanan-narkoba-kian-meningkat-menkum-ham-pengguna-tidak-tahanan-narkoba-kian-meningkat-menkum-ham-pengguna-tidak-perlu-dipenjara. Akses pada tanggal 12 Januari 2018.perlu-dipenjara. Akses pada tanggal 12 Januari 2018.
https://tirto.id/27-persen-pengguna-narkoba-di-indonesia-adalah-pelajar-https://tirto.id/27-persen-pengguna-narkoba-di-indonesia-adalah-pelajar-amp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.amp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.
https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember 2018.
Pelajarindo.com, downloaded 7 Maret 2018
Bibliography
Perpus
takaa
n Pelajarindo.com, downloaded 7 Maret 2018
Perpus
takaa
n Pelajarindo.com, downloaded 7 Maret 2018
BNNamp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.
BNNamp-mahasiswa-czi5. Akses pada tanggal 22 Desember 2018.
https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-
BNNhttps://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-
BNNhttps://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3553484/kepala-bnn-674-jenis-narkoba-
BNNbelum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember BNNbelum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember belum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember BNNbelum-terdaftar-di-undang-undang. Diakses pada tanggal 26 Desember
109Prevalence Survey 2018
Perpus
takaa
n BNN
Data and Information Research Center Data and Information Research Center National Narcotics Board of the Republic of IndonesiaNational Narcotics Board of the Republic of Indonesia(PUSLITDATIN BNN)(PUSLITDATIN BNN)Jl. MT Haryono No 11 Cawang. East JakartaJl. MT Haryono No 11 Cawang. East JakartaJl. MT Haryono No 11 Cawang. East JakartaTelp. (021) 80871566, 80871567Telp. (021) 80871566, 80871567Telp. (021) 80871566, 80871567Fax. (021) 80885225, 80871591, 80871593Fax. (021) 80885225, 80871591, 80871593Website : www.bnn.go.idWebsite : www.bnn.go.idEmail : [email protected] : [email protected] Center : 184Call Center : 184Sms Center : 0812-221-675-67Sms Center : 0812-221-675-675
P R E VA L E N C E S U RV E Y 2018
Currently, Indonesia has stated that the state is in drug emergency urrently, Indonesia has stated that the state is in drug emergency situation as drug abuse has spread to all layers of the society situation as drug abuse has spread to all layers of the society and across the country. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture and across the country. In 2018, BNN in cooperation with Culture
and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the and Society Research Center of LIPI carried out a survey to calculate the prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three prevalence rate of drug abuse. The survey was also carried out in three groups of the community, namely students and university students, groups of the community, namely students and university students, workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 workers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13 Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Provinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, and Papua.
Perpus
takaa
n BNNworkers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13
BNNworkers, and households. The survey in 2018 was conducted in 13
BNNProvinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands,
BNNProvinces, namely Aceh, North Sumatera, South Sumatera, Riau Islands, Jakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West BNNJakarta, West Java, East Java, DI Yogyakarta, Bali, East Kalimantan, West