Upload
aden-collier
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PREVALENCE, KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICES IN REFRACTIVE ERROR AMONG HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN
NAIROBI COUNTYDr. Margaret W NjugunaDr. Lucy Njambi Ombaba
Review of research literatureUncorrected refractive error(RE)•Global magnitude of uncorrected RE- leading cause of visual impairment and blindness•43% of visual impairment due to Uncorrected RE •80% of visual impairment worldwide can be avoided or cured•In children it may hinder school performance and lead to development of amblyopia.
1.Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, et al. Global Magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull world health Organ 2008; 862.WHO fact sheet on RE 2014
Review of research literature
Knowledge, attitude and practices(KAP) of refractive error•Lack of knowledge and stigmas plays a major role in uptake of refractive services in different continents•the lack of knowledge and awareness of RE are important risk factors for uncorrected RE 2,3,4
2.Congdon N., Z. m. (2008). prevalence and determinants of spectacle non-wear among rural Chinese secondary school children. Arch Ophthalmol., 1717-1723.3.Ebeigbe, J. (2013). attitude and beliefs of Nigerian undergraduates to spectacle wear. Ghana Medical Journal.4.Rosman M, W. T. (2009). Knowledge and beliefs associated with refractive errors and undercorrection: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol.
Study justification• Uncorrected RE -public health concern. • Uncorrected RE hampers performance at school,
reduces productivity and impairs quality of life.• Lack of knowledge, stigma and erroneous beliefs
towards RE plays a major role in uptake of refractive services .2,3,4
• Hardly any studies address KAP in refractive error • Assessing KAP gaps will justify intervention
programmes
1.H.Nzuki. (2004). 2. Helen Significant refractive errors as seen in standard eight pupils attending public schools in langata Division, Nairobi, K 2.Congdon N., Z. m. (2008). prevalence and determinants of spectacle non-wear among rural Chinese secondary school children. Arch Ophthalmol., 1717-1723.3.Ebeigbe, J. (2013). attitude and beliefs of Nigerian undergraduates to spectacle wear. Ghana Medical Journal.4.Rosman M, W. T. (2009). Knowledge and beliefs associated with refractive errors and undercorrection: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol enya 2004
Study ObjectivesBroad objective • To determine the prevalence, knowledge, attitude and
practice in refractive errors among high school students in Nairobi county.
Specific objectives• To determine the prevalence of refractive error among
high school students • To assess the knowledge of refractive error among high
school students • To determine the attitude of high school students towards
refractive errors • To determine the practice in refractive error of high school
students
MethodologyStudy design•Cross sectional school based study with a qualitative componentStudy population •Form 3 high school students in public high schools in Nairobi CountyStudy area•Nairobi county-80 public high schools in 10 divisions
Methodology• Sample size calculation and Sampling
MethodParameters • Estimate of the expected proportion (p)• Desired level of absolute precision (d) • Estimated design effect (DEFF)• Confidence limit (usually 95% and Z score
Methodology• Sample size calculation and Sampling Method• n = 1.962 x 0.1 x 0.9 (1.5)
0.022
• n = 1297• To estimate the assumed prevalence of refractive
error 10% with 95% CI (8% - 12%) among high school students, adjusting for the design effect of 1.5 and confidence limit (usually 95% and Z score = 1.96), the final minimal sample size will be 1297
• Factor 10% to end up with 1500• Total number 37580
MethodologySampling the Procedure•Stratification/Categories of schools- National schools, County schools and District schools•Sub-stratified into boy, girl & mixed•Schools from each category will be randomly selected using spreadsheet program•Participants will be form 3 students•Participants will be allocated a study number
Study area- Nairobi Countystarehe
dagoretti
westlands
Sampling frame of high school students in Nairobi County
News letter of high school performance1000-1500 in National schools, 300-900 in County schools and 200-400 in the District schools
Data collection procedurePresenting VA-Log MAR chart 3m
VA better than 6/12 in better eye. Record
VA
VA worse or equal to 6/12 in the better eye
RE ≥0.50 DS/DC
Power of spectacle -
LensometerObjective refraction & subjective
refraction
Plano/ 0.25 DS/DC
VA doesn’t improve by 2 lines
VA improves 2 lines or more=RE
KAP=FGD or IDI Anterior and
posterior segment examination-
recordyytyffcnhhg
Spectacles-VA sc&cc RE&LE
KAP FGD or IDI
Data management • Data analysis -SPSS 20.0. and Computer
Assisted/Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS).
• Double data entry to ensure accuracy.• Proportions will be used to estimate the
prevalence of R.E and proportion of students knowledgeable in refractive errors.
• Responses to the KAP questions will be scored. • Participants with RE will be assessed in terms of
KAP towards RE and access to ophthalmic services.
• Results will be presented using ratio, proportion, rates, tables and diagrams wherever appropriate.
Ethical considerations1. Approval -Ethical Committee of University of
Nairobi – Kenyatta National Hospital. 2. Permission -Permanent Secretary, Ministry of
Education and Head teachers of schools 3. Assent- Participants.4. Confidentially of participants records.5. Spectacle prescription and follow up for
participants with RE.6. Students with other ocular disease will be
referred to eye centers.
Tentative Timetable
• Ethical Approval by April 2014• Collection of data May- June 2014• Data Analysis July-August 31st 2014• Presentation of results September 2nd 2014• Hand in bound book by January 1st 2015