Preserving Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflicts

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/18/2019 Preserving Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflicts

    1/4

    Wilson Briefs | April 2016

    From the demolition of Iraqi archeological sites during the recent Iraq War, to thebulldozing of the Buddhas of Bamiyan by the Taliban in March 2001, to the recent

    destruction of some ancient Syrian artifacts and the looting of others by the Islamic State

    (ISIS), crimes against cultural heritage in armed conflicts pose a major challenge to the

    humanities in the 21st century. Cultural heritage has become a target in the Middle East

    because it represents a people’s history, memory, and culture, all of which are subject to

    erasure. As Michel Foucault remarked in a 1975 interview on film and popular memory:

    Preserving CulturalHeritage in Armed Conflicts

    by Yue Zhang

    The ongoing armed conflicts in the Middle East have caused severe damageto the region’s cultural heritage. Despite the challenges, great joint efforts

    have been made between local heritage professionals and the international

    heritage community. Such efforts demonstrate creative approaches to

    preserving cultural heritage in conflict zones, and illuminate the future of

    more efficient international cooperation.

    SUMMARY

    Open ruins of ancient city Ebla, S

  • 8/18/2019 Preserving Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflicts

    2/4WILSON BRIEFS 2

    Since memory is actually a very important factor in struggle, … if one controls

    people’s memory, one controls their dynamism. And one also controls their

    experience, their knowledge of previous struggles.1 

    Safeguarding an afflicted population’s cultural heritage, by contrast, not only respects

    human dignity by protecting their collective memory and way of life, but also lays a

    foundation for a return to normalcy following a disaster.

    International Institutions and Local Professionals

    In response to crimes against cultural heritage, local heritage professionals and the

    international heritage community have raised a great joint effort. Participants include

    archaeologists, museum professionals, historic preservationists, historians, librarians,

    archivists, and experts at major international cultural organizations concerned with heritage

    preservation, such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization

    (UNESCO), the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), the InternationalCentre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM),

    and the International Council of Museums (ICOM).

    The Safeguarding the Heritage of Syria Initiative Project, known as SHOSI, is one of the

    major humanitarian interventions. Created in spring 2013, SHOSI is a consortium of the

    Penn Cultural Heritage Center at the University of Pennsylvania Museum; the Office

    of the Under Secretary for History, Art, and Culture at the Smithsonian Institution; the

    Geospatial Technologies Project at the American Association for the Advancement of

    Science; the United States Institute of Peace; and the Day After Association (a Syrian

    nongovernmental organization). In summer 2014, as ISIS advanced into Iraq, SHOSI

    expanded its efforts to support Iraqi heritage professionals, and renamed itself the

    Safeguarding the Heritage of Syria and Iraq Project.

    In late June 2014, SHOSI conducted a three-day course on emergency care for Syrian

    museum collections in Gaziantep, Turkey. Approximately 20 heritage professionals,

    primarily from the provinces of Aleppo and Idlib, attended. The workshop taught

    participants how to protect portable objects during emergencies and provided basic

    supplies for packing and securing museum collections that could be put to immediate

    use. More important, it created a dialogue among local heritage professionals about

    emergency needs and responses. Following ISIS attacks in Iraq and the occupation

    of Mosul in summer 2014, SHOSI brought a similar emergency heritage protection

    workshop and a short course to an audience of Iraqi heritage professionals in Erbil, Iraq.

    Training programs or e-training courses for affected regions’ heritage professionals

    also have been offred by UNESCO, ICOMOS, and ICCROM. Emergency training has

    1 Michel Foucault, “Film and Popular Memory: An Interview with Michel Foucault,”

    Radical Philosophy  11, no. 11 (1975), 28.

  • 8/18/2019 Preserving Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflicts

    3/4WILSON BRIEFS 3

    attracted participants from Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, and Turkey. The courses broadly

    cover ways to combat illicit trafficking, provide emergency stabilization for built heritage,

    protect moveable heritage, and record intangible heritage. In addition to training, SHOSI

    is engaging emergency preservation projects for at-risk cultural heritage. One such

    timely measure successfully protected the building and mosaic collection of the Ma’arraMuseum, located south of Aleppo, from the Assad regime’s June 2015 air force attack.

    Dangers and Other Obstacles

    Many challenges hinder the preservation of cultural heritage in a conflict zone. First

    and foremost, the conflict itself endangers heritage professionals in the region who

    might otherwise act. The personal safety of those undertaking emergency preservation

    efforts remains a paramount concern. Second, the international heritage community is

    constrained not only by the difficulty of travelling to these areas but also by the legal

    environment in which they must act. In Syria, for example, the United States and the

    European Union have imposed sanctions against activities that involve the Syrian financial

    system. For the United States, additionally, sanctions extend to collaboration with the

    Syrian government and its instrumentalities, one of which is Syria’s Directorate General

    of Antiquities and Museums (DGAM). American heritage professionals, therefore, are

    legally forbidden from working directly with the Syrian DGAM.

    Brian Daniels, director of research and programs at the Penn Museum, divulged in a

    conversation that all local partners of SHOSI have to be vetted by the U.S. Department

    of State for participation in the Assad regime’s unlawful activities or linkage to a terrorist

    or extremist group. SHOSI’s financial transactions have been subject to monitoring by

    the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. Although such

    scrutiny may be necessary, the multiple layers of bureaucratic oversight may impair

    timely reaction to a crisis.

    Reinforced and stabilized mosaics at the Ma’arra Museum,

    December 2014. Photograph source anonymous for protection.

    Ma’arra Museum curatorial staff preparing the mosaics for

    sandbagging, December 2014. Photograph source and staff

    members anonymous for protection.

  • 8/18/2019 Preserving Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflicts

    4/4WILSON BRIEFS 4

    Yue Zhang is an associate professor of political science at the University of Illinois atChicago, and a 2015–16 Wilson Center fellow.

    Roles for International Institutions, Local Professionals, and

    Policymakers

    The emergency heritage preservation projects in the Middle East have saved specific

    historic sites and antiquities and demonstrated a promising model for protecting cultural

    heritage when government capacity is destroyed in armed conflict. Recent experience

    supports the following recommendations:

    • The international heritage community should actively assist heritage professionals

    caught in armed conflict with information, dialogue, and supplies in order to

    increase their capacity to respond to emergencies.

    • Local heritage professionals must take the lead in emergency preservation.

    Only they are in a position to assess the risks involved in protecting sites and

    implementing projects.

    • Policymakers should regularly include heritage protection among humanitarian

    actions that directly support populations in crisis. With expanded policy support,

    international heritage institutions and local heritage professionals can be better

    integrated into the humanitarian and disaster response community and translate

    their expertise into action.

    The Wilson Center 

    @TheWilsonCenter

    facebook.com/WoodrowWilsonCenter

      www.wilsoncenter.org

    Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

    One Woodrow Wilson Plaza

    1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

    Washington, DC 20004-3027