16
The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidity Journal of Financial Economics 75, 2005 Robert Bloomfield, Maureen O’hara, Gideon Sarr Presented by Doug Chung

Presented by Doug Chung

  • Upload
    ike

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidity Journal of Financial Economics 75, 2005 Robert Bloomfield, Maureen O’hara, Gideon Sarr. Presented by Doug Chung. Introduction. Increased presence of electronic markets world wide - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Presented by Doug Chung

The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the

evolution of liquidityJournal of Financial Economics 75, 2005

Robert Bloomfield, Maureen O’hara, Gideon Sarr

Presented by Doug Chung

Page 2: Presented by Doug Chung

Introduction

► Increased presence of electronic markets world wide► Many electronic markets are organized as limit order books

No designated liquidity providers (market makers, dealers)► Questions addressed

How do informed/liquidity traders differ in provision/use of liquidity? How do characteristics of market affect these strategies? How do characteristics of the underlying asset affect provision of

market liquidity?► Results

Informed traders take as well as make liquidity When value of private info is high the informed trade via market orders When value of private info is low the informed trade via limit orders Unlike previous models the informed profit further as liquidity

providers and earn the spread

Page 3: Presented by Doug Chung

Introduction

► Trader types Informed traders: trade with their information to gain profit Liquidity traders: trade based on their liquidity needs

► Order type Limit order: provides liquidity Market order: takes liquidity

Page 4: Presented by Doug Chung

Experimental design

► Definition Cohort: group of six traders who always trade together Security: claim of terminal dividend identified by the value and

liquidity needs Market: time interval of which trade is possible for a specific security Only one security is traded in each market Session: 75min period where traders trade in a series of markets Each cohort trades 20 securities sequentially in a session

Page 5: Presented by Doug Chung

Experimental design

► Basic design 8 Cohorts: 48 participants To manipulate information: informed(2), liquidity(4) To manipulate volatility: high (uniform dist), low (bell shape dist) To manipulate extremity: high (more than $15 from expected value) low (less than $7 from expected value) To manipulate elapsed time: 15 second intervals for 120 seconds

Page 6: Presented by Doug Chung

Experimental design

► Trading Periods Pre-trading: 30 seconds, enter orders Main trading: 120 seconds, trades

► Trader types Two informed traders – given true value of the security Four liquidity traders

Target to sell 20 Target to buy 20 Target to sell 5 Target to buy 5

► Subjects MBA students – Johnson School of Management at Cornell university

Page 7: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► Summary statistics of market wide measures< Volume >

< Price errors = |quote mid point – true value| >

< Spread >

Markets behave very well

Page 8: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► Summary statistics of traders’ strategies

Informed submitted more limit orders – contrary to previous theory

Small traders trade 3 their desired amount – consistent with Odean (1999), Barber and Odean (2000)

U shape trading pattern

Page 9: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► Market vs. limit orders: the influence of time, volatility, extremity

submission rate =

# limit orders / # limit and market orders

Taking rate =

% trades completed by market orders

Page 10: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► The role of time Liquidity traders: use of limit orders decline with time – consistent

with Harris (1998) Informed traders: use of limit orders increase with time (provide

liquidity) – inconsistent with previous theoretical models

Page 11: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► Volatility and extremity

Informed traders behave differently when the realized value is extreme

– Use more market orders and less limit orders

Informed traders benefit from liquidity traders

Page 12: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► Trading strategies: behaviors of informed & liquidity traders

Informed traders use less limit orders and more market orders when

information is valuable

Less demand for immediacy after target is achieved

Remaining targetValue of information Informed has lower SR and higher TR when info is valuable

Page 13: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► Trading losses and trading strategies: a benchmark analysis

Page 14: Presented by Doug Chung

Results

► Trading strategies and the state of the bookLiquidity supply role

Consistent with Parlour (1998)’s model that traders would use less (more) limit orders as book depth on the same side (other side) increases

Unlikely to use limit order due to order priority

SR increases as depth on the other side increases

Page 15: Presented by Doug Chung

Conclusion

► Analysis of the evolution of liquidity in an electronic limit order market

► Large Liquidity traders prefer limit orders in the beginning but preference shift towards using more of market orders

Consistent with predictions of previous theoretical models

► Informed traders employ market orders in the beginning but over time shift to trading mostly limit orders

Another source of profit: the spread by providing liquidity Inconsistent with predictions of previous theoretical models

► Explains why electronic markets can endogenously create liquidity even in the presence of information asymmetry

Page 16: Presented by Doug Chung

Thank You