26
Pursuing Best Cost Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better Focus Co. A Better Focus Co.

Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Pursuing Best Cost Solar Pursuing Best Cost Solar ConcentrationConcentration

Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, ArizonaConference in Phoenix, Arizona

Doug SimmersDoug Simmers

A Better Focus Co.A Better Focus Co.

Page 2: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

World Energy Consumption is Projected to World Energy Consumption is Projected to Continue IncreasingContinue Increasing

Page 3: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Most of the world’s growing energy needs through 2030 will continue to be met by oil, gas, and coal.

Source: “The Outlook for Energy”, ExxonMobil 2006

Forecasted Growth of Energy ProductionForecasted Growth of Energy ProductionForecasted Growth of Energy ProductionForecasted Growth of Energy Production

Page 4: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

ProblemProblem

• Increasing energy costs, coupled with global warming concerns make all solar applications more viable

• But-- there is still a significant cost differential between delivered solar energy, and traditional sources

• We must close this cost gap in order for solar technology to gain widespread acceptance

Page 5: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Best Cost ConcentrationBest Cost Concentration

• A Better Focus Co. is dedicated to designing and manufacturing a “best cost” concentrating solar dish– Lowest materials cost – Superior performance to glass mirror systems– Excellent long-term weatherability

Page 6: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Solar Cooking DishesSolar Cooking Dishes

Page 7: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Vacu-Dish TechnologyVacu-Dish TechnologyHow Does it Work?How Does it Work?

A tight seal is required so that a vacuum can be pulled inside the frame

Reflective film is precisely stretched across a

perfectly round frame

Page 8: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

With Application of vacuum, The film deforms into a concave shape, focusing light to a single hot spot.The backplane material also becomes slightly concave, Increasing the total strength of the assembly

US Patent #US Patent #. # 7374301. # 7374301

Page 9: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Design Solution- Strong, Design Solution- Strong, Lightweight, DishLightweight, Dish

• Just Film- no underlayment

• Self-supporting- Requires external frame for sun tracking, only

• Successfully scaled to 8’ diameter. 10’ diameter dish is envisioned

• ¼ scale model implemented into a 4-dish tracking structure

Patent PendingPatent Pending

Page 10: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Vacu-Dish Development Problems, Vacu-Dish Development Problems, and Solutionsand Solutions

• Reflective films are not new,– First patents for solar applications date

back to 1962– Many others have moved the art

forward, but there have been problems• Wrinkling of film- addressed via

patented floating batten• Spherical aberrations• Thermal stability- 20F to 120 F

demonstrated• Vacuum overhead- Improved seals hold

vacuum for days• Weather ability

– Film design– Abrasion resistance, catastrophic wind

and hail events• Expensive and heavy support structures• Receiver implementation• Cost

Page 11: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

• Vacuum-formed film has spherical aberrations that results in a string of focal points.

• Total size of the spot at the best focal point is larger than optimum

•Optimal focal points are desired to minimize the radiant and convective losses at the receiver. •This is a key advantage of point-focus systems compared to line focus trough or linear fresnel systems

Page 12: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Design Solution- Characterized film significantly Design Solution- Characterized film significantly improves concentration ratiosimproves concentration ratios

4’ dia. dish4’ dia. dishUncharacterized filmUncharacterized film

12’ focal length12’ focal length

4’ dia. dish4’ dia. dishCharacterized filmCharacterized film

25’ focal length25’ focal length

4’ dia. dish4’ dia. dishCharacterized filmCharacterized film

12’ focal length12’ focal length

Page 13: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Vacu-Dish Development Problems, Vacu-Dish Development Problems, and Solutionsand Solutions

• Reflective membranes are not new,– First patents for solar applications date back to 1962– Many others have moved the art forward, but there

have been problems• Wrinkling of film- addressed via patented floating batten• Spherical aberrations, and scaling difficulties- to be

discussed• Thermal stability- 20F to 120 F demonstrated• Vacuum overhead- Improved seals hold vacuum for days• Weather ability

– Film design– Abrasion resistance, catastrophic wind and hail events

• Receiver implementation • Expensive and heavy support structures- to be discussed• Cost

Page 14: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Addressing Catastrophic Wind and Addressing Catastrophic Wind and Hail EventsHail Events

Page 15: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Addressing Catastrophic Wind and Addressing Catastrophic Wind and Hail EventsHail Events

• Weathervane stowage mode turns dishes away from the wind, protecting reflective surfaces from blowing sand and hail

• Dishes rotate upwards to significantly reduce surface areas incident to the oncoming wind• Note positive pressure inside dishes, which establishes a safe convex shape to the mirror, and

also prevents damaging rippling of the film• Stowage mode is the default and unpowered- requires no motors or processors to implement

Testing of ¼ scale model at 50 mphTesting of ¼ scale model at 50 mph

Page 16: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Wind DeflectorWind Deflector

• Directs oncoming wind downward to enhance upward rotation of the dish

• Area reduction in high wind conditions is 60%

Patent PendingPatent Pending

Page 17: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Vacu-Dish Development Problems, Vacu-Dish Development Problems, and Solutionsand Solutions

• Reflective membranes are not new,– First patents for solar applications date back to 1962– Many others have moved the art forward, but there

have been problems• Wrinkling of film- addressed via patented floating batten• Spherical aberrations, and scaling difficulties- to be

discussed• Thermal stability- 20F to 120 F demonstrated• Vacuum overhead- Improved seals hold vacuum for days• Weather ability

– Film design– Abrasion resistance, catastrophic wind and hail events

• Receiver implementation • Expensive and heavy support structures• Cost

Page 18: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Dish/Thermal vs. Mini Power TowerDish/Thermal vs. Mini Power Tower

• Implementation as a “dish/thermal” system with integral receiver is optically optimal– Always on-axis to the sun

• Integral receiver disadvantages– Complexity in getting heat

exchange fluids through rotating structure

– Significant outboard weight– It’s costly to duplicate the

receiver at each tracker

Temperature vs. Solar Insolution

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 200 400 600 800

Degrees C

W/M

2

W/M2

Page 19: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Mini Power Tower Implementation Mini Power Tower Implementation

• Implementation as a mini power tower with a common fixed receiver is optically inferior – Off-Axis operation most of the day

• Integral receiver advantages– Tracker cost is significantly reduces– Fixed receiver is easier to design

and maintain

Unlike most existing large power tower arrangements, Unlike most existing large power tower arrangements, this is a focusing system, requiring only a 10-12” aperture at the receiver.this is a focusing system, requiring only a 10-12” aperture at the receiver.

Page 20: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Vacu-Dish Development Problems, Vacu-Dish Development Problems, and Solutionsand Solutions

• Reflective membranes are not new,– First patents for solar applications date back to 1962– Many others have moved the art forward, but there

have been problems• Wrinkling of film- addressed via patented floating batten• Spherical aberrations, and scaling difficulties- to be

discussed• Thermal stability- 20F to 120 F demonstrated• Vacuum overhead- Improved seals hold vacuum for days• Weather ability

– Film design– Abrasion resistance, catastrophic wind and hail events

• Receiver implementation • Expensive and heavy support structures• Cost

Page 21: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Material CostMaterial Cost

– Material Cost• 4’ diameter dishes are currently manufactured in low volumes• Material cost is $ 24/M2

• 8’ diameter prototype with weatherable film material cost is $55/M2

– Labor hours are currently very high, but the design is suitable for high-volume manufacture

• Powered rotary fixtures• Combining multiple operations in each revolution

Page 22: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Material CostMaterial CostReflective films and backplane materials are manufactured Reflective films and backplane materials are manufactured

in rolls that result in long rectangular sheetsin rolls that result in long rectangular sheets21% wasted material results when a 21% wasted material results when a circular section is cut out for a dishcircular section is cut out for a dish

Two 4’ diameter cooking dishes result Two 4’ diameter cooking dishes result from the leftover corners of one 10’ from the leftover corners of one 10’ diameter power dish. 3% wastage. diameter power dish. 3% wastage.

Page 23: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Latest DevelopmentsLatest Developments

• Dish instrumentation has been developed– Film concavity sensor- focal length– Film tension = circumfer. T – ambient T

• Improving ease of film replacement- Zip-Loc technology

Page 24: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Next Step- Full Scale UnitNext Step- Full Scale Unit We are seeking a company or institution that has a need for steam

or hot water, and is interested in jointly developing a full scale unit for solar steam generation

25 HP (68KBTU / hr.) of steam (or pressurized hot water)generation, Up to 100 PSI Scalable up to 125 HP (100 Kw) by adding additional trackers Desired partner attributes

Industrial/Institutional user with a year-round need for steam or pressurized hot water

Must have good solar resource Must be willing to share performance data Must be willing to share in the construction costs

A Better Focus Co. is willing to share intellectual property jointly developed.

Page 25: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

SummarySummary• The use of reflective film enables a lightweight dish

design• Lightweight dish design enables a lightweight tracking

structure• But large dish surface areas still must endure high wind

events• Weathervane stowage mode protects the reflective

surfaces, and upward rotation reduces surface area presented to the wind by 60%

• Dish/Thermal reciever implementation is optically optimal• Mini power tower is optically inferior, but much less

costly, and offers good scalability

Page 26: Pursuing Best Cost Solar Concentration Presented at the 2010 American Solar Energy Society Conference in Phoenix, Arizona Doug Simmers Doug Simmers A Better

Thank You- Questions?Thank You- Questions? Doug SimmersDoug Simmers

ABF Co.ABF Co.

www.abetterfocus.comwww.abetterfocus.com

[email protected]@abetterfocus.com

330-309-7561330-309-7561

Please join us for a live demonstration of our concentrating dishes

at our hospitality reception at the Wyndham Hotel, 50 W.

Adams St., from 5-7 PM

WyndhamWyndhamHyattHyatt

Symphony Symphony HallHall

ConventionConventionCenterCenter

XX

WW

NN

SS

EE