48
Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Presented at the NAEHCY ConferencePittsburgh, Pennsylvania

November, 2011Presenters:

William CoheeKristi Peters

Carl Love

Page 2: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Identification, Enrollment, Success in School

Description Required Evidence that: Documentation Met Not Met

Comments

The LEA collects and reports assessment data on the educational needs of homeless children and youth. Section 722 (f)(3)

Data Collection: The LEA collects information on homeless children and youth, including their place of residence.

The LEA ensures that homeless students are included in statewide assessments.

The LEA provides the SEA with academic achievement data for homeless students.

The LEA provides the SEA with academic achievement data showing improving performance for homeless students

Page 3: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

3

Gr 3 Rd Gr 3 Math Gr 4 Rd Gr 4 Math Gr 5 Rd Gr 5 Math Gr 6 Rd Gr 6 Math Gr 7 Rd Gr 7 Math Gr 8 Rd Gr 8 Math70.3 70.3 76.3 81.6 76.5 65.2 72.3 58.3 65.4 47.3 60.2 35.774.6 77.7 79.3 84.1 82.4 73.3 76.7 67.8 70 56.9 67.5 46.584 86 87.4 90.2 89.4 83.2 86.1 79.9 81.9 72.7 80.5 65.6

Page 4: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Advent of unique student identifier in Maryland which allows unduplicated counts.

Meetings with stakeholders during the end of 2008 to go over the new flags that would become part of the annual Maryland Attendance Data Collection.

Beginning in 08-09 school year, the LEA Homeless coordinators began to provide the student counts to the Local Accountability Coordinators (LAC)so that the homeless flags could be uploaded into the Attendance data set for each appropriate student.

Page 5: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 6: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Homeless A “Y” or “N” indicator of whether the student is homeless. Students should be identified based on their status at any time during the reporting period.

Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence

Indicator of a homeless student's primary nighttime residence, determined at the initial identification as homeless. Required if Homeless = Y.

S Shelters, Transitional Housing, Awaiting foster care

D Doubled-upU UnshelteredM Motels/Hotels

Homeless Served - McKinney

A “Y” or “N” indicator of whether the student is served with McKinney-Vento funds. Required if Homeless = Y.

Homeless Served - Other

A “Y” or “N” indicator of whether the student is served with funds other than McKinney-Vento. Required if Homeless = Y.

Homeless Unaccompanied Youth Status

A "Y" or "N" indicator for homeless youth who are not in the physical custody of a parent or guardian. Required if Homeless = Y.

Page 7: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Homeless= Y or N A “Y” or “N” indicator of whether the student is

homeless. Students should be identified based on their status at any time during the reporting period identified within this record.

 student’s status at any time during the reporting period identified within this record.

Page 8: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

student’s status at any time during the reporting period identified within this record

Homeless = Y TAS = Y Migrant = Y

Page 9: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Homeless Coordinators in each LEA provide counts to State Homeless Coordinator as well as their LAC who upload the data with homeless flags to the State Division of Accountability and Assessment in annual attendance collection.

The Division of Accountability and Assessment provides a preliminary report to the State Homeless Coordinator which is vetted with the LEA Homeless Coordinators if there are any differences in counts.

Differences are reviewed and corrected data are uploaded as appropriate

Page 10: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Division of Accountability and Assessment create EdFacts files with unduplicated counts using unique student identifiers based on the flags in the attendance data collection.

Data for the Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) are completed using these same data as well as using data collected via a survey sent out by the State Homeless Coordinator regarding services provided in the LEA as well as barriers.

Page 11: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Each Spring, the State Homeless Coordinator has a meeting with the LEA Homeless Coordinators to provide feedback and share statewide data for Maryland.

These meetings provide the opportunity for sharing and as well as discussion regarding the necessity of reviewing the data, especially regarding the academic outcomes within each LEA in order to make sure that services are provided as needed for optimal outcomes.

Page 12: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

12

Page 13: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

13

Page 14: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

14

Page 15: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

15

Unaccompanied Youth, Migrants, Special Education, English

Language Learners

Page 16: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

16

Page 17: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

17

Page 18: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

18

Page 19: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

19

Page 20: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

In each year, 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006, 12 of 24 local school systems received a McKinney-Vento subgrant.

In the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 school years, 11 LEAs received funding.

In 2008-2009, 12 LEAs received subgrants. In 2009-2010, 16 LEAs received subgrants.

20

Page 21: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

The 16 LEAs receiving McKinney-Vento funds in 2009-2010 enrolled 12,621 homeless students (duplicated count).

The 8 non-funded LEAs enrolled 689 homeless students.

Although LEAs receiving funds accounted for the majority of homeless students, unfunded LEAs did enroll 5% of the homeless students in the state in the 2009-2010 school year.

Last year (2008-09), 8% of homeless students were enrolled in LEAs without grants.

21

Page 22: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

22

Page 23: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

23

Page 24: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

24

Page 25: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

25

Page 26: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

26

Page 27: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

27

Page 28: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

28

Page 29: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

29

Page 30: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

30

Page 31: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

31

Page 32: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

32

Page 33: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

33

Page 34: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

34

Page 35: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

35

Page 36: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

36

Page 37: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

37

Gr 3 Rd Gr 3 Math Gr 4 Rd Gr 4 Math Gr 5 Rd Gr 5 Math Gr 6 Rd Gr 6 Math Gr 7 Rd Gr 7 Math Gr 8 Rd Gr 8 Math70.3 70.3 76.3 81.6 76.5 65.2 72.3 58.3 65.4 47.3 60.2 35.774.6 77.7 79.3 84.1 82.4 73.3 76.7 67.8 70 56.9 67.5 46.584 86 87.4 90.2 89.4 83.2 86.1 79.9 81.9 72.7 80.5 65.6

Page 38: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Baltimore County, Maryland Public Schools

Page 39: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 40: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 41: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 42: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 43: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 44: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Baltimore Baltimore CountyCounty

Page 45: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 46: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 47: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love
Page 48: Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love

Teachers can drill down to individual student to adjust teaching methods

Informal assessments for new enrollments Case Management Approach-Begin

informed conversation Training of school personnel Knowing resources are needed Address achievement gaps through

homework clubs