Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date)

1

Cities - 11 Highway districts – 3 Ada and Canyon

Counties School districts – 2 Valley Regional Transit Idaho Dept of

Environmental Quality

Idaho Transportation Department

Boise State University Capital City

Development Corp Board of 34

Elected/Senior Officials

2

Metropolitan Planning Organization for Ada and Canyon Counties

An MPO is required for areas > 50,000 population in order to use federal funds

Long-range transportation planning Short-range funding priorities Transportation-related air quality

planning Mobility planning – transit, walking,

biking Transportation legislative services Demographic monitoring and projection Travel demand modeling

3

Last plan started in 2004 and was adopted in August 2006

2,000 people participated in a variety of workshops, open house meetings and small group meetings

Implementation of various elements of CIM is underway

4

5

Workshops in Nov 2004 and Feb 2005 Nearly 1,000 people participated Developed many “scenarios” about

how region could grow Two were continued: Trend and

Community Choices

6

Primary character of future growth is low density

Areas of Impact as shown may have been amended since map was prepared

7

Primary character of future growth is mixed density and uses

Areas of Impact as shown may have been amended since map was prepared

8

9

526,000 Population Base

10

825,000 Population BaseCommunity Choices Scenario

11

SH 55

SH

16

SH

16

SH 44

SH

16

Sta

r R

d

SH

69

Deer Flat Rd

Kuna Rd Kuna Rd

Kuna-Mora Rd.

Kuna-Mora Rd

SH

21

I-84

I-84

I-84

I-84 WB

I-84I-84

I-84I-84

I-84

I-84 I-84

I-84

I-84 I-84

I-84

I-84

I-84I-84

I-84 W

B

I-84 EB

I-84

SH 44

Duf

f Ln

KC

ID R

d

So

uth

sid

e B

lvd

So

uth

side

Bl v

d

Melba Rd.

SH

45R

im R

d

SH

45

SH

45

Lake Shore Dr.

SH

55

Riv

ers

ide

Dr

Rim

Rd

US

95

SH 19 SH 19

We

itz R

d

SH 19

Ustick Rd.

Weitz R

d

SH 55

Hwy 18

Hwy 18

Hwy 18

US

95

Red Top Rd

I-84

I-84

US 20/26

Dixie Rd.

Dixie Rd.

Hoskins Rd

I-84

I-84

I-84

Sta

r R

d.

Sw

an

Fa

lls R

d

King Rd

Market Rd

Wa

ms

tad

Rd

Galloway Rd Galloway Rd

SH 44

SH 19

Missouri Ave

Lewis Ln

I-84 EB

Klahr Rd

Peckham Rd

Fa

rgo

Rd

Hill

Rd

Ten Mile Creek Rd

Col

e R

d.

Galloway RdGalloway Rd

Ustick Rd. Ustick Rd.

Hoski ns Rd

I-84

12

SH 55

SH

16

SH 1

6S

tar

Rd

Pine St

Deer Flat Rd

Kuna-Mora Rd.

Kuna-Mora Rd

SH

21

I-84

I-84

I-84

I-84 WB

I-84I-84

I-84I-84

I-84

I-84

I-84

I-84 I-84

I-84

I-84

I-84

I-84 WB

I-84 EB

I-84

Duf

f Ln

So

uth

sid

e B

lvd

So

uth

side

Bl v

d

Melba Rd.

SH

45

Rim

Rd

SH

45

SH

45

Lake Shore Dr.

SH

55

Riv

ers

ide

Dr

Rim

Rd

US

95

SH 19 SH 19

We

itz R

d

SH 19

Ust ick Rd.

We

itz R

d

SH 55

Hwy 18

Hwy 18

Hwy 18

US

95

Red Top Rd

I-84

I-84

Hoskins Rd

I-84

I-84

Sta

r R

d.

Sw

an

Fa

lls R

d

King Rd

Market Rd

Galloway Rd Galloway Rd

SH 44

SH 19

Missouri Ave

SH

16

I-84 EB

Klahr Rd

Peckham Rd

Fa

rgo

Rd

Ferry Rd

Hill

Rd

Ten Mile Creek Rd

Co

le R

d.

Galloway Rd

Ustick Rd.

Hoski ns Rd

I-84

SH

16

I-84

13

14

5%

Based on population of 560,000

14,000 hours of delay

15

23%

Based on population of 825,000

140,000 hours of delay per day

16

75%

Based on population of 1.5 million

1.8 million hours of delay per day

17

18

19

1

Rim

Rd

Sout

hsid

e Bl

vd

Deer Flat Rd

Peckham Rd

Stat

e H

wy

45

10th

Ave

Cherry Ln

Melba Rd

12th

Ave

Lake Shore Dr

Boise River Rd

Lake

Ave

US

Hw

y 95

Missouri Ave

Farg

o Rd

Red Top Rd

Market Rd

Wam

stad

Rd

Kuna Rd

Mid

dlet

on R

d

Greenhurst Rd

Perc

h Rd

Lone Star Rd

Galloway Rd

Not

us R

d

Orchard Ave

Mid

land

Blv

d

Hwy 19

Uof

I Rd

Stat

e H

wy

55

Ustick Rd

Appl

e Va

lley

Rd

Hap

py V

alle

y Rd

Dixie Rd

Bowmont Rd

Rive

rsid

e Rd

Frie

nds

RdMarket St

Wag

ner R

dAlle

ndal

e Rd

Got

sch

Rd

State Hwy 19

Franklin Rd

Rode

o Ln

Pow

erlin

e Rd

US Hwy 20/26

Purple Sage Rd

Hw

y 95

Ross Ln

Simplot Blvd

Klahr Rd

US

Hw

y 95

Hwy 19

Purple Sage Rd

Karcher Rd

Ustick Rd Ustick Rd

Purple Sage Rd

Eagl

e Rd

Blac

k Ca

t

Ustick Rd

Franklin Rd

Kuna-Mora Rd

Lind

er R

d

Clov

erda

le R

d

Ten

Mile

Rd

Overland Rd

McMillan Rd

Five

Mile

Rd

Kuna Rd

Fairview Ave

Swan

Fal

ls R

d

Star

Rd US HWY 20 & 26

W Columbia Rd

King Rd

Beacon Light Rd

Map

le G

rove

Rd

Mer

idia

n Rd

Orc

hard

St

13th

Cherry Ln

Lake Hazel Rd

Kuna

-Mer

idia

n Rd

Avalon S Lo

cust

Gro

ve R

d

Floating Feather Rd

Plea

sant

Val

ley R

d

Pine Ave

Victory Rd

McD

erm

ott R

d

HWY 21

Broa

dway

Mitc

hell

1st S

t

Roos

evel

t

Edna StIrene

Vist

a Av

e

S Co

le R

d

Curti

s Rd

Columbia Rd

Law

Desert

Milw

auke

e St

Northview

Pier

ce P

ark

Rd

Amity Rd

Deer Flat Rd

Appl

eOw

yhee

Homer Rd

Gek

eler

Sunset

Cole

Rd

Boga

rt

Scho

ol A

ve

Targee

Edge

woo

d

Anne

tte

E Amity Rd

Hollandale

Eagl

e Rd

Amity Rd

Star

Rd

Lind

er R

d

Lake Hazel Rd

Pine Ave

Overland Rd

Kuna-Mora Rd

S Co

le R

d

McD

erm

ott R

dM

cDer

mott

Rd

Victory Rd

S Lo

cust

Gro

ve R

dS

Locu

st G

rove

Rd

King Rd

Can-

Ada

Rd

Community Choices Optimal Transit System

Draft

September 1,2005

Bus Route

BRT and Commuter RailEstimated Capital and Operating Cost: $1.1 billion in 2005

20

21

Roads O&M,

$3,168

Roads Minor

Capital, $700

Roads Major

Capital, $2,629

Transit - O&M,

$1,520 Transit - Capital, $270

Costs in MillionsTotal is $8.3 Billion

22% of Total

T:\FY07\600 Projects\661 CIM\FY06\661 CIM\07-PublicMeetings\Presentations\westernplannerconf.ppt

22

Roadway CapitalUnfunded $628,600,000Annual Unfunded $25,144,000Annual share/household $71

Transit TotalUnfunded $1,098,890,000Annual Unfunded $43,955,600Annual share/household $125

Total PlanUnfunded $1,727,490,000Annual Unfunded (25 year period) $69,099,600Annual share/household (2030 base)

$196

Adopted in August 2006. Next update needed no later than August 2010

Refinement—not a start from scratch Funding will be the major challenge A "preservation" scenario based on

comprehensive plans Projects prioritized into five-year

periods

23

24

25

Outreach via organizations - service clubs, neighborhood groups, professional groups. Continuous

Workshops addressing financing – June 2009

Public open house meetings – Fall 2009 Public comment events – Spring 2010 Major reliance on internet

26

Financial – Work Started by Consultant Growth Forecast and Allocation Transit System – New Chapter Management and Operational – New

Chapter Efficiency Maintenance Safety/Security

27

Roadways – Five Year Increments, Typologies and Complete Streets

Pathways – New Chapter Environmental Mitigation – New

Chapter Freight – New Chapter

28

Refine prioritization process to focus on regional needs and desired outcomes

Seek additional funding Local option taxes Increased registration fees and fuel taxes Expanded impact fee base

Congestion Pricing – tolls? Issues

As gas prices go up, consumption and gas tax revenue go down

Massive increases in construction costs since 2003

29

30

Source Transportation Financial ReportOctober 2008

31

Actual

Estimated and

Forecasted

825

432

Transit ridership goes up with frequency of service

No longer an 8-5 economy – but current services shut down at 6:30pm

Community design is also key: compact, mixed-use areas well connected with sidewalks and bike lanes

Need for better information services

32

R² = 0.791

-20.0

-10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Tri

ps/

Cap

ita

Revenue Hours/Capita

Transit Trips and Service Provided Source: FY 2006 National Transit Data

Ada/Canyon Transit

33

Source Transportation Financial ReportOctober 2008

34

Road deficit higher than 2006 Plan Need to remove some corridors

from “funded” list New design typologies under

consideration Design - complete streets concept Adequate public facilities Corridor preservation

35

Federal rules - more consideration of making efficient use of existing system

Preservation of current system is higher priority

Safety and security of system is also critical

36

37

S1104233914

½ Mile

38

http://www.geoearth.uncc.edu/people/iheard/3115Notes/Feb%205.ppt#281,24,Level of Service Measures

39

Source Transportation Financial ReportOctober 2008

40

A 2008 Idaho study concluded

that % of roads in poor-fair shape could triple by

2025

41

42

43

BOISE

Nampa

Caldwell

MiddletonSTAR EAGLE

MERIDIAN

ADA COUNTY

KUNA

CANYON COUNTY

2006 Traffic Counts

124,000

21,000

19,000

October 2006ITD Counters

A 2008 survey found that <5% of external traffic is through trips

44

$5-7 million per mile

$14+ million per mile

$1.1 million per mile

Conformity Finding – Transportation based emissions cannot exceed “budget”

New rules allow testing of only projects in the funded list

Challenge of meeting the new ozone standards – may see area in non-attainment by 2011

Expanding growth numbers could be an issue

45

T:\FY07\600 Projects\661 CIM\FY06\661 CIM\07-PublicMeetings\Presentations\

westernplannerconf.ppt

46

CLEVER CAR 3.3 feet wide 10 feet long

Natural gas - 94-107 mpg

2-passengerTop speed - 60

mph 250 miles cruising

range

47