Premature Medication

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Premature Medication

    1/3

    7/30/10 4:remature medication : Nature News

    Page ttp://www.nature.com/news/2006/061222/full/news061218-14.html

    Published online 22 December 2006 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news061218-14

    Column

    Premature medication

    Handing out experimental drugs to desperate patients is not a good

    idea, says Apoorva Mandavilli.

    Apoorva Mandavilli

    At first glance it seems only kind and right to let people with serious illnesses take whatever

    medicines they want. Some have campaigned so hard for this that the US Food and Drug

    Administration agreed on 11 December to let patients buy experimental drugs direct from themanufacturer when there are no other options available.

    But this could have some terrible consequences.

    Yes, the humanitarian argument for giving access is compelling. And yes, on an individual basis,

    seems cruel to deny a medicine to someone who is suffering. But if the drug hasnt been properly

    tested, how do we know it wont aggravate the illness or, worse still, prove fatal to the people who

    take it? It may even actively discourage companies from investing in proper trials for those drugs

    where the only customers are desperate patients.

    Some untested drugs, such as those for AIDS and cancer, have been available under

    compassionate use programmes since the 1970s but only in emergencies and only to those wh

    are expected to die within months of a terminal disease.

    The new rule, by contrast, gives anyone with a serious condition that affects functioning or

    quality of life schizophrenia and rheumatoid arthritis, for example, but not allergies or minor

    pain access to drugs that have only been through a phase I trial, provided there are no viable

    alternatives. At that stage, the drug has been tested in as few as 10 healthy volunteers not in

    people with the illness and scientists may know little about its safety and nothing about itseffectiveness.

    Consider this: 70% of drugs make it past this first stage of trials, but only 8% are approved in the

    end.

    Winners and losers

  • 8/8/2019 Premature Medication

    2/3

    7/30/10 4:remature medication : Nature News

    Page ttp://www.nature.com/news/2006/061222/full/news061218-14.html

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Some groups that have sued the FDA for access cite the example of Erbitux, which was promising

    from the start and went on to be approved for head, neck and colon cancers. Patient groups

    vigorously campaigned for early access to this drug, and won their case in court this May.

    But heres another example: earlier this month, development of Pfizers torcetrapib, a cholesterol

    drug that was expected to work miracles, was halted after it contributed to the death of people

    taking it. It was only in a large phase III trial that this effect became obvious.

    The fact is that drug development is wildly unpredictable. For every Erbitux that makes it, there

    are about 10 torcetrapibs that dash expectations.

    You might still argue that its up to each individual a constitutional right, as some groups argu

    to make that decision. After decades of fighting against this issue, the FDA, now under new

    management, seems to think so too. As Janet Woodcock, the FDA's deputy commissioner for

    operations, told reporters: Some people definitely want to take that risk and we want to give the

    that choice."

    But is it an informed choice? The grim statistics of failed drugs are not widely known. It is the

    success stories that usually grab headlines, but the chance of success is slim. Offering the drugs

    may seem like a lifeline to those who have lost hope, but it will probably put their lives, and the

    lives of many others, at risk.

    Second chance

    Imagine this scenario: a seriously ill patient takes a promising drug, hoping against hope for a

    miracle. Even the best drugs can have nasty side effects, particularly in a small subset of people,and the drug in this case kills the patient. After the hue and cry that follows, would anyone give

    the drug a second chance? Would a healthy volunteer, let alone someone who is sick, enrol in a

    clinical trial to test it further?

    And theres another serious consideration: if the drug

    is available under compassionate use before approval,

    what incentive does anyone ever have to enrol in a

    clinical trial where there is no guarantee if they end

    up in the placebo group that they will receive it?

    What incentive does the company have to develop it,

    knowing they can sell the untested drug?

    The FDA says it plans to make sure none of these

    things happen, but its not yet clear how. The rules

    http://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v8/39e7/0/0/%2a/x;225501967;0-0;0;9916591;4307-300/250;37009369/37027247/1;;~sscs=%3fhttps://secure.nature.com/store/svc/campaign?prod=NATURE&text=NA1006EB000
  • 8/8/2019 Premature Medication

    3/3

    7/30/10 4:remature medication : Nature News

    Page ttp://www.nature.com/news/2006/061222/full/news061218-14.html

    About NPG

    Contact NPG

    RSS web feeds

    Help

    Privacy policy

    Legal notice

    Accessibility statement

    Terms

    Nature News

    Naturejobs

    Nature Asia

    Nature Education

    About Nature News

    Nature News Sitemap

    Search: go

    Nature ISSN 1744-7933 EISSN 1476-4687

    arent set in stone yet there is a public comment

    period of 90 days.

    Lets assume that companies wont exploit the situation, that the FDA will make sure they play fa

    and that the companies will continue to test the drug further. Putting untested drugs in the hand

    of desperate people is still a recipe for disaster.

    Visit our newsblog to read and post comments about this story.

    2010 Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. AllRights Reserved.

    partner ofAGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, CrossRef and COUNTER

    http://www.nature.com/info/partners.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/info/copyright_statement.htmlhttp://blogs.nature.com/news/blog/2006/12/premature_medication.htmlhttp://ad.doubleclick.net/click;h=v8/39e7/0/0/%2a/x;225501967;0-0;0;9916591;4307-300/250;37009369/37027247/1;;~sscs=%3fhttps://secure.nature.com/store/svc/campaign?prod=NATURE&text=NA1006EB000http://www.nature.com/news/about-this-site.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/news/about-us.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/scitable/http://www.natureasia.com/http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/http://www.nature.com/news/http://www.nature.com/info/tandc.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/info/accessibility_statement.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/info/legal_notice.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/info/privacy.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/help/http://www.nature.com/webfeeds/http://www.nature.com/npg_/contact/http://www.nature.com/npg/