28
Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES & PEER Annual Meeting San Francisco, 8 -9 October 2010

Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions

Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran

University of Washington

NEES & PEER Annual MeetingSan Francisco, 8 -9 October 2010

Page 2: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Acknowledgments

WSDOT

TRANSNOW

Valle Foundation

FHWA, Highways for Life Program

PEER

Page 3: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Background

Accelerate on-site bridge construction.

Use precast concrete components.

Connection details:

seismic-resistant

construct

Page 4: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Construction Procedure

1) Excavate footing.

Page 5: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

2) Position and brace precast column.

Construction Procedure

Page 6: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

3) Place footing reinforcement and cast.

Construction Procedure

Page 7: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

4) Set cap-beam, grout bars into ducts.

Construction Procedure

Page 8: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

5) Place girders, diaphragms and deck.

Construction Procedure

Page 9: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Precast

Prestressed

CIP

RC (ref)

Precast

RC

Cap-Beam

to Column

Column to

Spread Footing

Column to

Drilled Shaft

Connections

Page 10: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Column-to-Cap-BeamConnection

Page 11: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Cap Beam Connection: Many small bars and ducts

Courtesy: BERGER/ABAM Engineers

Tight tolerances.

Page 12: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Precast column

Precast cap beam

6 # 18 rebar

8.5” corrugated steel ducts

High strength grout

Cap-Beam Connection: Large bars

Page 13: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Cap-Beam Connection: Conclusions

• Failure occurs in the column.

• Large-bar precast connection behaves the same as a cast-in-place connection.

Page 14: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Column-to-FootingConnection

Page 15: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Footing Connection: Construction

Headed bars

Page 16: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Footing Connection: Headed Bars

Strut and Tie Model.

Page 17: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Footing ConnectionHooked bars facing out(Conventional cip)

Load transfer is tangential to hook.

Ineffective!

Page 18: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Footing Connection: Construction

Page 19: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Spread Footing Connection

Vertical (gravity) load.

Lateral (seismic) load.

Page 20: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Spread Footing Connection: Test

After seismic testing. Foundation undamaged.

Page 21: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Spread Footing Connection – Gravity Load Test

Column crushed at: 3.5 * (1.25DL + 1.75LL).

No damage to footing. No sign of punching failure.

Page 22: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Spread Footing Connection

Constructability:- Column has no projecting bars.- No “form-savers”.- Easy to fabricate and transport.

Page 23: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Spread Footing Connection

Structural Performance:• Terminators provide better anchorage than

hooked bars facing outwards.• Failure in column. Footing undamaged in

lateral load and vertical load tests.• Seismic performance as good as, or better

than, conventional c.i.p. construction.

Page 24: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Implementation

Bid Opening:

October 14th

Page 25: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Pre-Tensioned System

Page 26: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Pre-Tensioned System PC cap-

beamSleeved strand

Bonded strandc.i.p.

footing

Bonded rebar

Cracking plane

Page 27: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Pre-Tensioned System

1.Pre-tensioning solves corrosion problems perceived to exist in post-tensioning.

2.Pre-tension in a plant.

• Good QC.

• Special equipment and extra site time for post-tensioning are not needed.

• Can add rebars for energy dissipation.

Page 28: Precast Bent System for Bridges in Seismic Regions Marc Eberhard, John Stanton Olafur Haraldsson, Todd Janes, Hung Viet Tran University of Washington NEES

Thank You