Pre-1028 January 25, 2007 Clark-Pleasant Middle School THE CLARK-PLEASANT COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION The mission of the Clark-Pleasant Community School

Pre-1028 January 25, 2007

Clark-Pleasant Middle School

THE CLARK-PLEASANT COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION

The mission of the Clark-Pleasant Community School Corporation is to provide an educational program that enables students to make positive contributions to society. They should be challenged to excel as responsible lifelong learners, held accountable for setting and achieving personal goals, and develop positive self-esteem




Agenda

1. Introduction of Pre-1028 Design Workshop Process

2. Recap of Building Program (Scope)

3. Workshop No. 2: “Develop Basis of Design and Conceptual Design (QUALITY)”

4. Review Public Survey Questions

5. Stakeholder Concerns, Questions/Answers

6. Next Workshop





1.1 Welcome

1.2 Team Introduction of Workshop Attendees

1.3 CPCSC Board of School Trustees

David Stephenson

Howard Young

Jeff Brinkman

Brian Drake

David Penoff





1.4 CPCSC Administration

Dr. J.T. Coopman, SuperintendentMr. Steve Sonntag, Director of BusinessMr. Jay Wise, Facilities and Project ManagerMr. Jim White, Director of TechnologyMrs. Sondra Wooton, Principal, CPCSC Middle SchoolMr. Brad Arbuckle, Assistant Principal, CPCSC Middle

SchoolMr. Jay Staley, Athletic Director, CPCSC Middle School





1.5 Consulting Team: CSO Schenkel Shultz and Educational Services

Jim Schellinger, AIA – PrincipalJohn Rigsbee, AIA, LEEP®AP – Principal/Project ManagerDr. Rosemary Rehak, LEEP®AP – Educational

Programmer/ PlannerRejan Westfall, LEEP®AP – Project ArchitectDr. Tom Grabill – President, Educational ServicesDr. Donald Dyck – Consultant, Educational Services




1. Introduction of Pre-1028 Design Workshop Process (Continued)

1.6 Project Balance…………………For The Middle School Project

SCOPE(Program

Requirements)

QUALITY(Conceptual/

Basis of Design)

COST(Basis of Budget)

Project Schedule





1.7 Pre-1028 Design Workshop ScheduleWorkshop No. 1: “Establishing the Need, Understanding Stakeholder

Concerns/ Questions and Development of the Building Program (SCOPE)”

Thursday, January 11, 20076:30 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.Clark-Pleasant Middle School

Workshop No. 2: “Develop Basis of Design and Conceptual Design (QUALITY)”

Thursday, January 25, 20076:30 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.Clark-Pleasant Middle School

Workshop No. 3: “Establish Basis of Budget (COST), Tax Impact and Project Timeline”

Thursday, February 8, 20076:30 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.Clark-Pleasant Middle School





1.7 Pre-1028 Design Workshop Schedule (Continued)Pre-1028 Board Board meeting to wrap-up Pre-1028 workshops and

gain Meeting: consensus on the project’s scope, quality, cost and schedule.

Tuesday, February 20, 20076:30 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.Clark-Pleasant Administration Building

1028 and Preliminary 1028 Hearing and the PreliminaryDetermination Determination Hearing.Hearings:






1.8 “Establishing the Need”

“Decades of Excellence Taskforce Summary”

• 50 member long range facilities taskforce of community members and staff convened by Superintendent Dr. J. T. Coopman in November 2005.

• Taskforce Focus – To update the corporation’s long range (10 year) facilities plans through 2016.

• Twenty-two (22) taskforce meetings throughout 2005/2006 with two public forum presentations.

– December 11, 2006 @ Clark Elementary School– December 13, 2006 @ WCHS





1.8 “Establishing the Need” (Continued)

• Taskforce Issues and Considerations:

– Explosive growth of student enrollment over past 10 years and projected over next 10 years.

– Severe facility shortage within next 3 years (High School – Intermediate Level – Middle School)

– Maintaining safe environment for students, staff and community.

– Maintain quality of community life during period of rapid growth with quality schools.






• Taskforce Issues and Considerations: (Continued)

– Limited tax base

– Serious consequences of actions by legislative bodies, state education agencies and local planning commissions

– All day Kindergarten

– Rapidly changing demographic profile of the school corporation with more diverse students

– Need for greater dialog among community members






• Taskforce recommendations included personnel, curriculum and facility recommendations.

• Based on enrollment projections, the “maximum” capacity levels will be reached and additional space will be needed for:

– Grades 9-12 by 2008/2009– Grades 5-6 by 2009/2010– Grades 7-8 by 2010/2011– Grades K-4 by 2011/2012

(includes new Pleasant Crossing Elementary opening in 2007/2008)






• Selected Option “B”:

– New Middle School for 1,600 students with “common use space “designed to accommodate a future 500 student Intermediate School.

– The existing Middle School will become part of the High School Campus as a ninth grade academy for 900 students which will free up space for growth within the High School which will accommodate 3,500 students in 2015.






• Selected Option “B”:

– A new Intermediate School for 500 students adjoining the new Middle School. At that point, all Middle and Intermediate School students will be on the same site.

– A future new Elementary School.

– All options considered will require use of temporary classrooms.

• CPCSC will then conduct a demographic study once every two years to evaluate enrollment and growth trends.




2. Recap Building Program (Scope)

2.1 “Student Learning Spaces (SCOPE)”

SPACE DESCRIPTION PROGRAM NOTES1600 planned students, grades 7 -8 assumed 7 period day

each total each total

NET SQUARE

FEET

PROGRAM SPACE CHARTPROGRAMSTUDENTSSPACES

teaching stations

non-teaching stations

A. Langauge Arts

1. Language Arts Classrooms 10 26 260 1,000 10,000

2. Department storage/office 1 1,000 1,000

3. Small tutoring/resource room 1 300 300

Sub-Total: 10 260 11,300

B. Reading

1. Language Arts Classrooms 10 26 260 1,000 10,000



Sub-Total: 10 260 11,300

C. Math

1. Math Classrooms 10 26 260 1,000 10,000



Sub-Total: 10 260 11,300





2.1 “Student Learning Spaces (SCOPE)” (con’t)



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


D. Science

1. Science Classrooms 10 26 260 1,000 10,000

2. Science prep 1 300 300

3. Science Storage 1 1,000 1,000

4. Science Lab 2 1,950 3,900


6. Departmental Office Space 1 500 500

Sub-Total: 10 260 16,000

E. Social Studies

1. Social Studies Classrooms 10 26 260 1,000 10,000



Sub-Total: 10 260 11,300

F. Special Ed.

1. Essential Skills 1 10 10 1,200 1,200 include 2 rest rooms and 50 sq ft time out

2. Resource Rooms 4 1,000 4,000

3. Office 1 150 150

Sub-Total: 1 10 5,350





2.1 “Student Learning Spaces (SCOPE)” (con’t.)



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


G. Related Arts

1. FACS 2 26 52 1,400 2,800

2. Career Education 2 26 52 1,400 2,800

3. Foreign Language 1 26 26 1,000 1,000

4. Agriculture 1 26 26 1,000 1,000

5. Health 2 26 52 1,000 2,000

6. Physical Education 2 26 52 1,000 2,000

7. Humanities 2 26 52 1,200 2,400

8. Office space 4 120 480

9. Related Arts Storage 4 100 400

Sub-Total: 12 312 14,880

Total student learning spaces 63 1,622 81,430





2.2 “Performing and Visual Arts Space (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


A. Visual Arts

1. Art Classrooms 2 26 52 1,200 2,400

2. Art Prep/Storage 1 500 500

3. Kiln/Clay Room 1 250 250 2 kilns

Sub-Total: 2 52 3,150

B. Music

1. Performance band room 1 70 70 3,000 3,000

2. Instrument storage room 1 500 500

3. Choir / Orchestra 2 60 120 1,600 3,200

4. Orchestra instrument storage 1 500 500

5. Storage 1 500 500

6. Practice room : large 1 500 500

7. Practice room : small 3 150 450

8. Practice room : small 3 80 240

9. Music library 1 150 150

10. Music office 1 300 300

Sub-Total: 3 190 9,340

C. Large Group Instruction

1. LGI 1 3,600 3,600 With Operable Wall

2. Stage 1 600 600

3. Dressing room 2 500 1,000 includes restrooms

4. Chair Storage 1 500 500

Sub-Total: 0 0 5,700

Total performing and visual arts spaces 5 242 18,190





2.3 “Media Center and Technology Spaces (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


3 MEDIA CENTER AND TECHNOLOGY SPACES

A. Library/Media Center

1. Stacks 1 0 1,200 1,200

2. Reference section 1 0 500 500

3. Formal/Informal seating 1 0 1,200 1,200

4. Electronic card catalog 8 0 12.5 100

5. Circulation desk - entry 1 0 300 300

6. Small group study 2 0 150 300

7. Librarian office and workroom 1 0 300 300


0

B. Media Technology 0

1. AV stor / repair / production 1 0 500 500

2. Television production studio 1 0 300 300

3. Media distribution Center 1 0 200 200

4. Software / CD storage 1 0 200 200

5. Technology office 1 0 150 150


0

C. Computer/Tech Labs 0

1. Computer /Tech Labs 6 0 1,200 7,200

2. Multi-media Labs 2 26 52 1,200 2,400

Sub-Total: 0 52 9,600

Total media center and technology spaces 0 52 14,850





2.4 “ Fitness and Wellness Spaces (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


4 FITNESS AND WELLNESS SPACES

A. Gymnasiums

1. Main Gymnasium 1 0 12,000 12,000 bleacher seating for 1600, divider curtain, enhanced acoustics, sound system and lighting

2. Field House 1 0 20,000 20,000 Three basketball courts, wood flooring at one court, multi-purpose flooring on other courts, two divider curtains

3. Storage 3 0 1,000 3,000

Sub-Total: 0 0 35,000

B. Wrestling

1. Wrestling room 1 4,000 4,000

2. Wrestling storage 1 500 500


C. Weights/ Cardiovascular

1. Cardio/ Weight room 1 4,000 4,000

2. Storage 1 250 250






2.4 “ Fitness and Wellness Spaces (SCOPE)” (con’t.)



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


D. Locker facilities

1. P.E. lockers : Boys 1 1,800 1,800 400-500 two-tier lockers

2. P.E. lockers : Girls 1 1,800 1,800 400-500 two-tier lockers

3. Team lockers : Boys 2 1,500 3,000

4. Team lockers : Girls 2 1,500 3,000

5. Athletic director's office 1 300 300

6. Coach's office / lockers 1 500 500 include toilet & shower

7. P.E. office 1 450 450

8. Laundry 1 150 150

9. Uniform and equipment storage 2 250 500

10. Training room 1 500 500

11. Concessions 1 300 300

12. Officials Locker room 2 150 300

13. P.E. storage 2 500 1,000

Sub-Total: 0 0 13,600

Total fitness and wellness spaces 0 0 57,350





2.5 “ Cafeteria/Kitchen Spaces (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


5 CAFETERIA AND KITCHEN SPACES

A. Cafeteria

1. Common Cafeteria 1 8,000 8,000Accommodate 4 lunch periods @ 525 split

between intermediate & middle

2. Faculty lounge 1 1,200 1,200 adjacent to cafeteria


B. KITCHEN/SERVIING AND SUPPORT

4. Serving Area 1 1,680 1,680 1 at 1080,; 1 at 600

1. Cafeteria director's office 2 100 200

2. Receiving and storage 1 150 150

3. Prep and Production 1 1,500 1,500

4. Dry storage 1 500 500

5. Ref / freezer storage 1 500 500

6. Washing and tray return 2 500 1,000

7. Staff toilets - lockers 1 150 150

8. Laundry 1 150 150

9. Cart Storage 1 150 150

10. Janitor - cleaning 1 50 50


Total cafeteria and kitchen spaces 0 0 15,230





2.6 “ Administration and Staff Spaces (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


A. Administrative Suite

1. Waiting and reception area 1 500 500

2. Principal's office 1 225 225

3. Assistant principal's office 2 200 400

4. Dean's office 2 150 300

5. General conference room 1 500 500

6. Office/Teacher Workroom 1 500 500

7. Treasurer office/Vault 1 200 200

8 File storage 1 250 250

9 Coat Closet 1 30 30

10 Parent room 1 700 700


B. Nurse's Area

1. Waiting area 1 80 80 shared supervision w/ admin

2. Office (nurse) 1 100 100

3. Exam - treatment rooms 2 180 360 with sink

4. Cot room 7 100 700

5. Storage -supplies 1 100 100

6 Toilet 2 75 150 with shower






2.6 “ Administration and Staff Spaces (SCOPE)” (con’t.)



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


C. Guidance

1. Waiting area 1 300 300 8-15 people

2. Guidance counselor's office 4 150 600 (1) for psychometrist

3. Speech therapist's office 1 150 150 shared with vision/psych/social

4. Shared conference room 1 250 250

5. In - school suspension 1 500 500


D. Staff Rest Rooms

1. Staff rest rooms 12 100 1,200


Total administration and staff spaces 0 0 8,095





2.7 “ Common/Interaction Spaces (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


A. Book store

1. Book store 1 600 600

Sub-Total: 0 0 600

B. Public Areas

1. Lobby 1 1,500 1,500

2. Student Commons 1 2,500 2,500


C. Rest Rooms

1. Public/Student Rest Rooms 20 400 8,000


Total common and interaction spaces 0 0 12,600





2.8 “ Facility Management and Support Spaces (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


A. Mechanical, electrical and Custodial

1. Central mechanical room 1 3,500 3,500

2. Mechanical fan rooms 8 1,500 12,000

3. Custodial office 1 120 120

4. Custodial lockers 1 120 120

5. Custodial closets 8 50 400

6. MDF 1 150 150

7. IDF 6 100 600

8. Main electrical switchgear room 1 300 300

9 Electrical Distribution Rooms 6 100 600

Sub-Total: 0 0 17,790

B. Property Control

1. Shipping and receiving/Loading dock 1 500 500

2. Building maintenance - supplies 1 500 500

3 Secured staging - storage 1 1,000 1,000

4. Receiving office 1 150 150


Total facility management and support spaces0 0 19,940





2.9 “ Outdoor Facilities (SCOPE)”



NET SQUARE

FEET


teaching stations


A. Athletic Fields

1. 400M track 0 08 lanes, 2 shot put, 2 discus throws, 2 high

jumps, 2 long jumps

2. Football field 1 0 with Lights and synthetic turf

3. Practice Football Field 1 0

4. Football grandstands 1 0 match existing capacity

5. Baseball Fields 4 0 2 fields with lights

6. Softball Diamonds 4 0 2 diamonds with lights

7. Soccer Field 1 0 with Lights and synthetic turf

8. Practice Soccer Field 2 0

9 Tennis Courts 10 0 with Lights

Sub-Total: 0 0 0

B. Concessions/Storage/Rest Rooms

1. Baseball/Softball Concessions 1 500 500

2. Public Rest Rooms 2 500 1,000

3. Outdoor Storage Area 4 500 2,000

4. Football/Soccer Concessions 1 500 500

5. Baseball/Softball Pressbox 1 500 500

6. Football/Soccer Pressbox 1 500 500

7. Ticket booth 2 200 400


Total outdoor facilities 0 0 5,400





2.10 “Development of the Site and Building Program (SCOPE)” Clark Pleasant - Middle School Program for 1600 students with Support Spaces for 2200Whiteland, IndianaJanuary 11, 2007

PROGRAM SUMMARY

Net Programmed Area

Low High Low High

1. Student Learning Spaces 81,430 sf 1.30 1.35 105,859 sf 109,931 sf2. Performing and Visual Arts Space 18,190 sf 1.30 1.35 23,647 sf 24,557 sf3. Media Center and Technology Spaces 12,450 sf 1.30 1.35 16,185 sf 16,808 sf4. Fitness and Wellness Spaces 57,350 sf 1.30 1.35 74,555 sf 77,423 sf5. Cafeteria/Kitchen Spaces 15,230 sf 1.30 1.35 19,799 sf 20,561 sf6. Administration & Staff Spaces 8,095 sf 1.30 1.35 10,524 sf 10,928 sf7. Common/Interaction Spaces 12,600 sf 1.30 1.35 16,380 sf 17,010 sf8. Facility Management & Support Spaces 19,940 sf 1.30 1.35 25,922 sf 26,919 sf

Sub-Total Net S.F. 225,285 sf 292,871 sf 304,135 sf

9. Outdoor Facilities 5,400 sf 1.10 1.10 5,940 sf 5,940 sfTotal Net S.F. 230,685 sf 298,811 sf 310,075 sf

* Definition of Grossing Factor:

Programmed1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

Grossing Factor* Gross Building Area

Allowance for all other 'non-program' building areas, such as corridors, stairs, mechanical shafts, wall thicknesses, etc.

Building Areas

Clark Pleasant - Middle School Program for 1600 students with Support Spaces for 2200Whiteland, IndianaJanuary 11, 2007

PROGRAM SUMMARY

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

Programmed1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.





2.11 “Development of the Site and Building Program (SCOPE)”


PROGRAM SUMMARY

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

180 sf 187 sf

Programmed1. Student Learning Spaces 632. Performing and Visual Arts Space 53. Media Center and Technology Spaces 04. Fitness and Wellness Spaces 05. Cafeteria/Kitchen Spaces 06. Administration & Staff Spaces 07. Common/Interaction Spaces 08. Facility Management & Support Spaces 0

Sub-Total Teaching Stations 68

9. Outdoor Facilities 0Total Teaching Stations 68

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

Teaching Stations

Area per Student (not including outdoor facilities)


PROGRAM SUMMARY

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

Programmed1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

9.





2.12 “Development of the Site and Building Program (SCOPE)”

PROGRAM SUMMARY

ProgrammedTotal Actual

Students

1. Student Learning Spaces 1,622 0.85 13792. Performing and Visual Arts Space 242 0.85 2063. Media Center and Technology Spaces 52 0.85 444. Fitness and W ellness Spaces 0 N/A 05. Cafeteria/Kitchen Spaces 0 N/A 06. Administration & Staff Spaces 0 N/A 07. Common/Interaction Spaces 0 N/A 08. Facility Management & Support Spaces 0 N/A 0

Sub-Total Student Capacity 1916 1629

9. Outdoor Facilities 0 N/A 0

Total Student Capacity 1916 1629

Students Efficiency Factor




Table of Contents• Sitework

• Building Structural Systems

• Building Exterior

• Building Interior

• Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System

• Plumbing Systems

• Electrical Systems

• Technology Systems

Definitions• Base Design: A fully functioning middle school, of good construction quality level, that

addresses the basic academic needs of most middle schools and whose cost will be at or near the Indiana DLGF construction cost thresholds

• Design Upgrades: Upgrades to the base design that the community and school corporation may determine need to be included in the design of the project to:

» fulfill the current and future needs of the community and students

» Result in a more energy efficient, easier to maintain and less costly to operate building

3. Workshop No. 2: “Develop Basis of Design and Conceptual Design

3.1 Basis Of Design (Quality)




Sitework – Base Design• Clear, physical separation between bus drop-off/parking and car drop-off/parking• Driveway connection to Intermediate School parking• Adequate parking for faculty, staff, visitors, and after-hours events• Minimal, low-maintenance landscaping to facilitate supervision and security• Adequate site lighting for after-hours events, faculty and security• Adequate directional signage• Illuminated ground-mounted sign• Water service for new building, outdoor facilities and fire protection system• Electrical service for new building and outdoor facilities• Storm drainage system to comply with Johnson County/City of Greenwood requirements• Sanitary sewer for new building and outdoor facilities• Outdoor facilities

Football field with bleachers, press box and lighting Football/soccer practice field Running track with field events Soccer field Softball diamond Storage Baseball field






Sitework – Design Upgrades• Additional outdoor facilities

Dedicated football practice field Dedicated soccer practice field(s) Additional softball diamonds Additional baseball fields Lighting at baseball and/or soccer field(s) Bleacher seating at soccer field Concessions, rest rooms, additional storage Press box(es) at baseball field and/or softball diamond Press box at soccer field

• Additional roadwork improvements if required by Johnson County or City of Greenwood• Additional parking for large non-school related activities• Security fencing around property






Building Structural Systems – Base Design• Combination of masonry bearing-wall system or precast concrete bearing-wall system along with

conventional steel framing system for support of elevated floor and roof systems • Roof system of open-web steel joists with standard metal roof decking• Elevated Floor system of open-web steel joists with concrete on standard metal decking designed to

comply with building codes (potential for more noticeable bounce in floors)• Concrete slabs at floors on grade• Thickened slabs to support interior masonry walls• Non-AISC certified fabricators• Standard requirements for concrete floor levelness and flatness

Building Structural Systems – Design Upgrades• All conventional steel framing for support of elevated floor system and roof system (facilitates

more rapid construction and provides more flexibility for future renovations)• Elevated floor system of composite steel beams with concrete on composite metal decking (to

reduce potential for noticeable bounce in floor)• Continuous footings to support interior masonry walls (reduces cracking of floor slab)• Acoustical roof or floor decking at large open areas with exposed structure (i.e., gymnasium,

fieldhouse, student commons, etc.)• AISC certified fabricators (higher degree of quality control)






Building Exterior – Base Design• Materials to be a combination of durable, low maintenance materials (brick, heavy gage metal

panel, limestone, etc.) at high abuse areas and more cost effective materials at all other areas (i.e., EIFS, light gage metal panel, etc.)

• Simple design using simple details • Roofing system to be low-maintenance, rubber membrane system with 20 year warranty, sloped to

roof drains, with R20 roof insulation• Window framing system to be aluminum “storefront” framing system • Exterior glass to be standard, clear insulated glass• All instructional areas to have adequate natural lighting (up to 50 square feet of window area per

classroom)• Entry doors and framing systems to be standard-duty aluminum with minimal glass areas• Automatic door operators at main entrance only• Roof drains to be connected to storm water management system






Building Exterior – Design Upgrades• Materials to be a durable, low maintenance (brick, heavy gage metal panel, limestone, etc.) at all

areas• Roofing system to be low-maintenance, Energy Star Compliant, high performing membrane or

modified bitumen system with 30 year warranty, sloped to roof drains, with R25 insulation• Window framing system to be combination of aluminum “storefront” and “curtainwall” framing

system • Colored window framing system• Exterior glass to be tinted, low-e insulated glass for improved energy performance• Colored glass tint (i.e., blue, green or gold colored glass)• All instructional areas to have maximum natural lighting (up to 150 square feet of window area per

classroom) to improve energy performance and provide brighter learning spaces• Operable window units in classrooms• Entry doors and framing systems to be heavy-duty aluminum with large glass areas• Automatic door operators at all public entrances/exits






Building Interior – Base Design• Partitions in gym, fieldhouse, weight room, wrestling room, kitchen and locker areas to be concrete

masonry• Partitions in all other areas to be gypsum wallboard (drywall) • Walls in office areas to have vinyl wall covering• Walls in rest rooms to have ceramic tile on 50% of total wall surface• Typical interior door system to be solid wood doors with metal frames• Classroom doors to have narrow vision lite• Classrooms to have “intruder” function locksets• Classroom casework (cabinetry) to be educational grade plastic laminate casework with plastic

laminate counter tops• Student lockers to be 12” deep x 12” wide x 60” high with combination lock (1600 total)• Ceilings in classrooms, offices, cafeteria, media center, etc. to be 2’ x 2’ lay-in acoustical ceiling –

minimum ceiling height of 9’-0”• Ceilings in rest rooms to be moisture resistant gypsum wallboard• Flooring in administration areas, media center and LGI room to be carpet squares• Flooring in corridors to be vinyl composition tile• Flooring in classrooms to be carpet• Flooring in cafeteria to be vinyl composition tile• Flooring in rest rooms to be ceramic tile

Develop Basis of Design (Quality)




Building Interior – Base Design (continued)• Flooring in gym to be wood gym floor system• Flooring in fieldhouse to be rubber sports flooring• Flooring in kitchen to be quarry tile• Projection Screens to be provided in instructional areas• Each instructional area to have adequate marker board and tack board areas• Toilet partitions to be metal partitions with baked enamel painted finished• Gym to have electrically operated, retractable seating system for 800 spectators/students• Kitchen to be commercial grade kitchen to serve 525 students (4 lunch periods)• LGI to have full-height, manually operated wall to provide maximum flexibility• LGI and cafeteria to have large, electrically operated projection screen• Elevator to be standard duty, hydraulic elevator – elevator cab finishes to be painted steel doors and

frame, vinyl tile flooring, plastic laminate wall panels, and stainless steel rails






Building Interior – Design Upgrades• Partitions in corridors, cafeteria and rest rooms to be concrete masonry• Gypsum wallboard on partitions between classrooms to be abuse resistant wallboard• Gypsum wallboard at exterior walls to be mold resistant• Science room casework (cabinetry) to be educational grade wood casework with epoxy resin

counter tops• Student lockers to be 16” wide (100 additional lockers to allow for breakage and flexibility)• Flooring in corridors to be terrazzo• Flooring in cafeteria to be terrazzo• Flooring for one basketball court in fieldhouse to be wood gym floor system• Material of toilet partitions to be solid plastic• Capacity of retractable seating system in gym to be increased to 1600• Operable partition in LGI room to have electrical operation• Acoustical wall treatment in large assembly spaces and music spaces• Additional acoustical treatment in gymnasium for music performances






Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System – Base Design• System to provide comply with codes and national standards for comfort and energy efficiency• Eliminate use of unit ventilators in instructional areas• Adequate fresh outside air with humidity control• Standard efficiency equipment with standard manufacturer’s warranty• Individual space controls in all instructional areas• Galvanized steel ductwork• Basic digital controls system

Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) System – Design Upgrades• Occupancy sensors or CO2 controls in each instructional area for energy efficiency• High efficiency equipment with extended warranty• Additional zones of temperature control in non-instructional areas areas• Design ductwork to minimize noise in instructional areas• Advanced energy saving and maintenance reducing control strategies• Geothermal and/or energy recovery systems for lower life cycle costs






Plumbing System – Base Design• Standard, commercial grade fixtures• Adequate fixture quantities to meet current building codes• Variety of heights of fixtures at rest rooms to accommodate both students and adults• Code required fire protection

Plumbing System – Design Upgrades• High quality, longer life, reduced maintenance fixtures• Additional fixture quantities to meet periods of higher demand such as music performances or

athletic events• Infrared flush valves and faucets in rest rooms






Electrical Systems –Base Design• New electrical service• Energy efficient lighting fixtures• Provide adequate lighting levels in all instructional areas to meet current needs and electrical code• Sufficient electrical receptacles in all areas to meet current need• Code required fire alarm and smoke detection systems• Classroom intercom system• Standard battery clock system• Minimal performance lighting at stage or platform

Electrical Systems –Design Upgrades• Indirect lighting in instructional areas for improved glare resistance• Motion detection for lighting controls for energy efficiency• Variable lighting levels in all instructional areas• Additional electrical receptacles in all areas fore greater flexibility and future needs• GPS clock system• Emergency electrical power back-up system (UPS, generator, etc.)• Theatrical lighting at stage or platform






Technology Systems – Base Design• Technology system design and installation to be compliant with School Corporation’s standards• Data receptacles for three student computer stations plus one teacher’s station in each classroom• Media center to have adequate computer stations for research and instruction• Provide centralized networked printers and copiers for faculty• Basic security and access systems to be installed in accordance with School Corporation’s

standards• Minimal auxiliary sound systems in gymnasium, cafeteria, and LGI• Minimal athletic field lighting

Technology Systems – Design Upgrades• Energy management system• Data for two additional student computer stations in each classroom• Wireless network capabilities in media center, commons, or classrooms• Provide several networked printers and copiers for faculty throughout the building• Upgraded security and access systems (I.e., additional cameras, card access, etc.)• Networked, LCD projectors in instructional areas with auxiliary sound• LCD or plasma screens for information and messages in main public and administrative areas• Sound reinforcement systems for teachers in all instructional areas• Enhanced auxiliary sound systems• Enhanced video production and distribution infrastructure






Workshop No. 2: “Develop Basis of Design and Conceptual Design 3.2 Conceptual Design - Aerial Photograph of Site





3.2 Conceptual Design – Existing Site Plan





3.2 Conceptual Site Plan





3.2 Conceptual Design – Enlarged Conceptual Plan




4. Review Public Survey Questions

1 Many believe that quality schools result in a better quality of life for communities. Do you agree that having quality schools here in the Clark-Pleasant Community School Corporation can help in retaining and attracting new jobs and help improve the overall climate in the community?

1 – YES, schools make a difference: 2 – NO, schools don’t make that much of a difference: 3 – Undecided/don’t know:

2 The Clark-Pleasant Community School Corporation is ranked as number four among

Indiana’s fastest growing school corporations, with a substantial number (over 1,300) new students in the past five (5) years. Were you aware that the Clark-Pleasant School Corporation had this increase in student enrollment?

1 - YES. 2 - NO:

3 The Clark-Pleasant School Corporation has implemented a series of recent construction projects to handle the increased enrollment and better serve the children in the school district. In the past five (5) years, the School Corporation has constructed an agricultural greenhouse building, renovated and enlarged Whiteland Community High School and Whiteland Elementary School, constructed an intermediate school for fifth and sixth graders, added portable learning labs and constructed a new elementary school. Were you aware of these construction projects that will help address the growing enrollment in the district?

1 – Yes 2 – No 3 – Undecided/Don’t know:




4. Review Public Survey Questions (con’t.)

4 Student safety remains a priority for the Clark-Pleasant School Corporation. Studies have shown that lower class sizes and adequate space for instruction help ensure student safety and reduce discipline problems. Do you support spending money to build additional classrooms so that student safety remains a priority for the School Corporation?

1 – Yes, support spending money to address student safety issues. 2 – No, do not support spending money to address student safety issues. 3 – Undecided/don’t know:

5 The Clark-Pleasant School Corporation created a Task Force of community representatives to

determine the best options to address the growing enrollment in the district. This Task Force reviewed several options in order to ensure that recommendations made reflected the most cost-effective approaches possible. Numerous public meetings were held to receive input from the public. Were you aware of the meetings and efforts being made by the Task Force?

1-Yes, I was aware of the meetings and work being done by the Task Force. ] 2-No, I was not aware of the meetings and work being done by the Task Force

3-Undecided/Don’t Know:




4. Review Public Survey Questions (con’t)

6 A key part of the study conducted by the Task Force and discussions held during the community forums was an emphasis on building a new middle school while staying within the limits of local debt capacity for the School Corporation. This is designed to keep costs as low as possible and to establish accountability to taxpayers. If costs are kept low and accountability is established for taxpayers, would you support construction of a new middle school?

1-Yes, support construction of a new middle school. 2-No, do not support building a new middle school. 3-Do not support either proposal. 4-Undecided/Don’t Know.

7 The citizen-based Task Force stressed that the new middle school must be built, designed and constructed with materials that will ensure that the building will handle future curriculum development and enrollment increases. In addition, the Task Force approved plans that will enable the construction to start on time in order to be open by the 2010-2011 school years. Do you believe that it is important to build a new middle school with quality design, durable materials and a school that will be open on time to meet the growing enrollment needs of the district?

1 – Yes, quality, design and schedule are important to me. 2 - No, quality, design and schedule are not important to me. I do not support building a new middle school. 3 – Undecided/don’t know:




4. Review Public Survey Questions (con’t.)

8 Thank you for taking time to participate in this survey. We just have a few more questions. One of the most important is to determine your thoughts about the Clark-Pleasant School Corporation. We would like to gauge your beliefs on how the Clark-Pleasant School Corporation is educating our young people and preparing them for the future. Which of the following statements best characterize how you feel?

1 – The Clark-Pleasant School Corporation is doing a good job educating

and preparing our young people for the future. 2 – The Clark-Pleasant School Corporation is improving on educating and

preparing our young people for the future. 3 – The Clark-Pleasant School Corporation is not doing a good job

educating and preparing our young people for the future.




5. Stakeholder Concerns/Questions

The following questions were received from a stakeholder following Workshop Number 1:

•Please share the following:

•A list of all the land CPCSC currently owns which it has not developed, and the prices paid for the owned parcels.

•All budgets and final actual expenses for any school system construction project over $100,000 since 1996.

•Tax impact studies (if they exist) for the proposed schools/additions found in the Long Range Task Force Report presented in November, 2006 to the School Board.

•The process for determining current bus routes and bus schedules, and information about each bus run ( start/end/route, and usual duration of route).

•Information on portable classrooms – which vendors provide these, and what are the prices and features of the portable classrooms.





The following questions were received from a stakeholder following Workshop Number 1: (con’t.)

•It appears the school system employs a number of consultants to help it deal with issues related to growth, including the Educational Services Company, and CSO Schenkel Shultz Architects. For each consulting individual or group, we would request:

•The fees being paid to each consultant, by year, and generally itemized (e.g. by date, or type of work) if possible

•A copy of the contract under which the consultant is or has worked for CPCSC

•The qualifications (if possible V’s or resumes) for the consultants.

•Teacher Pay and qualifications – some of the data with regard to teacher pay appears in various places on the web, we were wondering if it would be possible to have a list of current salaries and qualifications (i.e., educational or extracurricular qualification (BS, MA info) and years experience.)





The following questions were received from a stakeholder following Workshop Number 1: (con’t.)

•The number of students eating breakfast at school (the totals for each school, if possible for the last three years and free lunch program data (again, just the total for each school in the system for the past 3 years.)

•The number of students for whom English is a Second Language, just a total per school (again, for the last 3 years would be great).

•A brief description of the relationship between CPCSC and the Growing Schools Coalition (are we members of this organization, if so, for how long, what are we spending to be members, and briefly, what is their objective and what outcomes have they been able to achieve to date.




5. Stakeholder Concerns/Questions (con’t)

The following questions were received from a stakeholder following Workshop Number 1:

•Who is conducting the Public Survey?

•How is the survey being conducted?

•Who is formulating the questions?

•What are the survey questions?

•It would be helpful if we had a clear calendar of events in terms of what is upcoming regarding school construction and growth issues.

•It would be helpful is agenda for School Board meeting were published in some way prior to the meetings (preferable at least a week in advance).





•The number of baseball and softball fields seems like overkill particularly with the north/south layout of the fields.

•We will indicate the difference between base needs and design options.

•I think that would be a good idea. It seems as though the building is just a small blip on the screen.

•When you talk about the base design and the upgrades, how much of that are we looking at? (We’re not sure right now, but will base it on cost.)

•I would like to think that the priority would be on efficiency rather than aesthetics.

•We will put a base bid together and then decide what alternates to include.

•Those kinds of upgrades are easier to defend if you are putting in things that save money down the road.

•Is the purchase of the property included in this estimate? (That all depends on the price, but it would be included in the project.)

•I understand there is a strong push in the legislature to do away with property taxes. Could you address that in the next workshop? ( We will try)





•If the kids have a band performance, where do you anticipate them performing? (We talked about enhancing the main gym so that it would be a good environment for performance. There is quite a bit of space in the music area. The LGI would be suitable for some performances.)

•I thought originally that the middle school would share space with the intermediate school and that it would be bridged. (The restrictions on the site make that difficult and we thought we would be better off by making this the best facility we could.)

•Can you make this into a joint elementary middle school and intermediate school and would the intermediate school become an elementary school? ( The thought is that the one wing would be an additional small intermediate school.)




4. Next Workshop

Workshop No. 3: “Establish Basis of Budget (COST), Tax Impact and Project Timeline


Documents

Pre-1028 January 25, 2007 Clark-Pleasant Middle School THE CLARK-PLEASANT COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION The mission of the Clark-Pleasant Community School