Upload
dotruc
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Motivation Climate change and shifting migration patterns
Avian mortality and endangered species
Habitat disruption
How can migration prediction help? Allows us to offset damage done to endangered species with human
intervention
Gives us a good index for global climate change fluctuations
The Data Set Ninigret National Wildlife Refuge Banding Summary 2008-2012
Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership Annual Monitoring Report 2008-2012
Texas Observation Station Banding Summary
Evaluation of Shorebird use of Selected Refuge Habitats in the Lower Mississippi Valley
Based on data sets, the experiment became more of a classification problem
The Feature Set Data sets included:
Weights Season of Arrival* Flock size (or Total birds found) Gender Time Spotted
Shorebird Vs Land bird feature manually added by data set
K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier Weighted Euclidean Distance formula used
Best classification results found for testing sets with 10+ nearest neighbors used within calculations Classification rate jumps from ~76% to ~84% between 10 and 11
neighbors, but declines afterwards
Conclusions 11 Neighbors optimal for classification of this particular dataset
Caveats: The data set used was parsed together Missing information Unreliable data upkeep pre-2009 Classification could be more reliable with a more spanning data set
References "IBP the MAPS Program." IBP the MAPS Program. Web. 20 Mar. 2016. "California Avian Data Center." California Avian Data Center. Web. 20
Mar. 2016. Cotton P.A, 2003 Avian migration phenology and global climate change.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 100,12219–12222. Richard Easterbrook, 2013, Ninigret National Wildlife Refuge Banding
Summary 2008-2012 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2012, Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership
Annual Monitoring Report 2008-2012 J. Wang and J.-D. Zucker, “Solving the multiple-instance problem: a lazy
learning approach,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stanford, CA, 2000, pp. 1119–1125.