15
Presented by Márton Kelemen Advisor: Tamás Haidegger Budapest University of Technologyand Economics, Hungary

Pozícióbecslési módszerek elemző összehasonlítása orvosi ... · Pozícióbecslési módszerek elemző összehasonlítása orvosi navigációs rendszerekben Author: Kelemen

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Presented by Márton Kelemen

    Advisor: Tamás HaideggerBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary

  • ØCIS, MIS, IGSØ Surgical tracking systems

    Ø OpticalØ OpticalØ ElectromagneticØ Other modalities

    ØPre-operative 3D-model of the patient(mostly MRI- or CT-based)

  • ØProvides a feedback to the surgeon

    Ø If robot operates: the joint-variablesØ If robot operates: the joint-variablesare well-known -> just for control(detect the crash of incrementalencoders or the drift from the initialregistration)

  • 1) To find the „optimal” representationfor coordinate-transformation

    2) Elaboration of a method, whichmakes us able to be more precise bythe pose-estimation of the end-the pose-estimation of the end-effector during the operation

  • Ø Translation + rotation -> homogeneoustransformation matrix

    Ø Comparison between 4 well-knownrepresentations (Euler, RPY, axis-angle and quaternion-based)quaternion-based)

    Ø Examined their sensitivity for disturbancesand non-linear distortions deriving + abilityfor interpolation (linear or SLERP)

    Ø Result: there aren’t significant differences, but the quaternions are mathematically more favourable (matrix-operations, no gimballock)

  • 0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45Euler-rotáció esetén a phi-szög átlagtól való eltérése és szórása különböző nagyságú phi-szögekre, a zaj szórásának függvényében

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    Normális eloszlású zaj szórása az elfordulási szögekre terhelve, %-ban megadva

    Phi

    szö

    g je

    llem

    zői [

    °]

    átlag, phi=0.5°szórás, phi=0.5°regressziós egyenes, phi=0.5°átlag, phi=5°szórás, phi=5°regressziós egyenes, phi=5°átlag, phi=45°szórás, phi=45°regressziós egyenes, phi=45°

  • ØProblem: coupled disturbances can’tbe removed from useful signal

    ØGoal: increased accuracy of theestimated pose -> rise of SNR

    ØConsiderations:ØConsiderations:Ø Noise modeled with Gaussian

    distributionØ Process can be stationary or dinamicØ Filter specification in the time domain

    Ø 2 methods were examined:Ø Moving average smoothingØ Kalman filtering

  • ØLPF, where span ~ cut-off frequencyØWider window -> smoother signal,

    but worse dinamic characteristics(slow response time)

    ØConclusion: only for stationary signals

  • 63.725

    63.73

    63.735

    green = samples of a 7 Hz signalmagenta = averaged 7Hz signalred = on value-changes

    100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 11063.7

    63.705

    63.71

    63.715

    63.72

    changesaveraged 7 Hz signalblue = 60 Hz interpolated redsignal

  • Ø Optimal linear estimator, one-step predictor-corrector algorithm

    Ø Weighting between actual measured and formerly estimated value during the Kalman gain

    Ø State space modelState space modelØ Succeed in tracking dinamic signals too, but with

    overshoots can’t be admitted in surgicalapplications

  • 63.8

    63.85

    63.8

    63.85

    black = original signalblue = filtered signalred = pre-estimatedsignal

    15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.563.6

    63.65

    63.7

    63.75

    15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.563.6

    63.65

    63.7

    63.75

  • ØNot steadily acquired dataØLow resolution camera -> certain

    values exist during more samples (see 50100

    150

    200

    250

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    values exist during more samples (seehistogram)

    Ø Solution: only the value-changes aretaken into consideration

    ØRate changing (interpolation and decimation) – not integer factor

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

    0

  • ØEKF, UKF, Markov-chains, Monte Carlo simulation

    Ø Sensor fusion, hybrid systemsØDevelopment of an intelligent filter byØDevelopment of an intelligent filter by

    means of a filter bank (event-basedestimation)

    ØPhysical modelling (noise still can be removed?) – e.g. with finite elementmethod by electromagneticdisturbances

  • Ø Lantos – Robot control; Academic Publisher, Budapest 2001

    Ø B. Danette Allen, Gary Bishop and Greg Welch – „Tracking: Beyond 15 Minutes of Thought”; SIGGRAPH 2001, Course 11

    Ø P. Grunnert, K. Darabi, j. Espinosa, R. Filippi – „Computer-aidednavigation in neurosurgery”; Neurosurg Rev (2003) 26:73-99

    Ø Andreas Tobergte, Mihai Pomarlan and Gerd Hirzinger – „Robust Multi Sensor Pose Estimation for Medical Applications”; 2009 Multi Sensor Pose Estimation for Medical Applications”; 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems

    Ø Russell H. Taylor, Fellow, IEEE and Dan Stoianovici – „MedicalRobotics in Computer-Integrated Surgery”; IEEE Transactions OnRobotics And Automation, Vol. 19, Nr. 5., October 2003

    Ø Gregory Scott Fischer – „Electromagnetic Tracker Characterizationand Optimal Tool Design (with Applications to Ent Surgery)”; John Hopkins University MSc Thesis, Baltimore, Maryland, 2005

    Ø Verena Elisabeth Kremer – „Quaternions and SLERP”; SeminarCharacter Animation, University of Saarbrücken, 2008

    Ø http://www.ndigital.com/medical

  • Thank you for your attention!

    Any questions?

    [email protected]