Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Power Line Relocation – Low Level Road
TECHNICAL REVIEW OF ROUTE OPTIONS
Prepared for:
Lamont (Monty) Hurd, EngL, ASct, CPWI 3 Project Engineer
City of North Vancouver
Prepared by:
Willis Energy Services Ltd. 500 – 885 Dunsmuir Street Vancouver, BC V6C 1N5
April 23, 2013
Power Line Relocation Technical Review Of Route Options
Executive Summary
Willis Energy Services was engaged by the City of North Vancouver, BC on March 27, 2013
to perform a technical review of route options to relocate the BC Hydro 69 kV service to
Port Metro. Ralph Zbarsky, P. Eng., Willis Energy Services Associate, completed this review.
The power line relocation has been necessitated by planned rail improvements which
require realignment and upgrades to the Low Level Road, the existing 69 kV line route. The
review comprised the proposed BC Hydro/Port Metro preferred route and additional
identified options.
This review has found that while the existing BC Hydro power line must be relocated,
electricity service to BC Hydro’s customer must be maintained throughout the entire
project realigning the Low Level Road and relocating the power line. There are limited
viable options that can meet these constraints and be cost-effectively constructed within
the realignment project’s schedule.
BC Hydro/Port Metro provided their preferred design that essentially involves rebuilding
and upgrading an existing overhead pole line that runs north-south along St. David’s
Avenue in order to cost-effectively meet the project schedule while maintaining 69 kV
service to BC Hydro customers throughout the project.
Other design options and route alternatives have been considered in this review. After
field investigation and consideration of the many factors, including potential
neighbourhood visual impacts, which determine a preferred design, the proposed BC
Hydro/Port Metro preferred route along St. David’s Avenue is seen as the suitable option in
this case.
It is the Reviewer’s opinion that implementing the BC Hydro/Port Metro preferred design
along St. David’s Avenue does not preclude the development, at some time in the future,
of an electricity transmission line located exclusively on Port Metro Property. As Pacific
Rim export demand continues to grow, it can be expected that Port Metro will pursue
material handling efficiency improvements that will require additional power. Planning
and design of any major Port Metro facility expansion or retrofit should consider
integrating on site power delivery and supply. Port Metro Property – Routes A and B are
examples of onsite routes.
Successful upgrades to the port will need to integrate power supply into the early project
planning stages. This would be beneficial to the long-term planning of BC Hydro, Port
Metro, and the City of North Vancouver.
Power Line Relocation Technical Review Of Route Options
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
1 Scope of Work .................................................................................................................... 1
2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 1
3 Review ................................................................................................................................ 2
3.1 St. David’s Avenue - New Taller Poles to provide 69 kV and 12 kV Service ................. 2
3.2 St. David’s Avenue - Underground Existing 12 kV line, New Taller Poles for 69 kV ..... 4
3.3 St. David’s Avenue - Underground New 69 kV Line, Maintain Existing 12 kV Line ....... 6
3.4 Eastern Routes Parallel to Low Level Road ................................................................. 7
3.5 Port Metro Property Route ........................................................................................... 7
4 Pole Replacement ..............................................................................................................12
5 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................12
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1: Typical Installation located outside the City ................................................................ 2
Exhibit 2: Typical Installation - Low Level Road.......................................................................... 3
Exhibit 3 Typical 12 kV and 69 kV Installation – 3rd Street ......................................................... 3
Exhibit 4: A typical pole with only 69 kV circuit ........................................................................... 4
Exhibit 5 At-grade Transformer for Underground 12 kV System ................................................ 5
Exhibit 6 Below-grade Mounted Switchgear for Underground 12 kV System ............................. 5
Exhibit 7: Typical Multiple poles ................................................................................................. 6
Exhibit 8: South of the Low Level Road ...................................................................................... 7
Exhibit 9: St. George’s Avenue and East Esplanade .................................................................. 8
Exhibit 10: Port Metro Property - Route A .................................................................................. 9
Exhibit 11: Vancouver Drydock Substation Looking East ..........................................................10
Exhibit 12: Vancouver Drydock Substation Looking East on Port Metro Property ......................10
Exhibit 13: Port Metro Property – Route B .................................................................................11
Exhibit 14 Distribution Pole for Replacement ...........................................................................12
Technical Review of Route Options Page 1 April 23, 2013
1 Scope of Work
A brief review of the BC Hydro/Port Metro preferred route and additional identified
options was requested by the City, as well as commentary on other relocation alternatives
that may become evident during the investigation.
The following options for St. David’s Avenue, along with alternative locations, were
reviewed.
1. St. David’s Avenue – New Taller Poles to provide 69 kV and 12 kV Service,
2. St. David’s Avenue – Underground Existing 12 kV Line, New Taller Poles for 69 kV
Line,
3. St. David’s Avenue – Underground 69 kV Service, Maintain Existing Overhead 12 kV
Line,
4. Port Metro Property Routes, and
5. Eastern Routes Parallel to Low Level Road.
2 Methodology
Based on information received from the City, I performed the following:
• conducted field investigations of the St. David’s route and other identified options,
• reviewed the BC Hydro 69 kV circuitry from the North Van Substation to the Low
Level Road area, and the existing 12 kV circuitry, to determine any other viable
options
• examined the railway alignments throughout the Port Metro property,
• reviewed the proposed re-alignment of the Low Level Road,
• discussed various design elements of this project with two of the lead designers
(with permission), to confirm the various professional standards they utilized in
their work, and
• identified structures similar to those proposed, to aid in the evaluation of the
considered options.
This brief review considered the following factors for each option:
a) Constructability
b) Maintenance requirements for ‘new’ lines
c) Site accessibility for future work
d) Rights-of-Way Procurement
e) Schedule constraints re: preparing additional designs for new construction
f) Material and equipment acquisition
g) Impact on neighbouring residents, both during construction and from the finished
project.
Technical Review of Route Options Page 2 April 23, 2013
3 Review
3.1 St. David’s Avenue - New Taller Poles to provide 69 kV and 12 kV Service
This proposed BC Hydro/Port Metro preferred design involves rebuilding the existing
overhead lines with taller poles to accommodate the 69 kV conductors. With regard to
the factors a) through f) listed above, there are no significant issues. The impact on
residents, factor g), will be that some views may be impacted by the additional pole
height and additional conductors. Exhibit 1 presents a typical design installation, located
outside the City. Exhibit 2 presents another example of typical design along the Low
Level Road.
Exhibit 1: Typical Installation located outside the City
Technical Review of Route Options Page 3 April 23, 2013
Exhibit 2: Typical Installation - Low Level Road
This structure design is in place along 3rd
Street as well. As seen in Exhibit 3 the sight lines
from the residences along 3rd
Street appear to be below the 69 kV lines. This would be
the case for single-family and low-rise residences as well. The sight lines for the existing
residences along St. David’s Avenue also appear be below the proposed 69 kV lines.
Exhibit 3 Typical 12 kV and 69 kV Installation – 3
rd Street
Technical Review of Route Options Page 4 April 23, 2013
3.2 St. David’s Avenue - Underground Existing 12 kV line, New Taller Poles for 69 kV
This option appears that it could mitigate the potential visual impact of the project by
avoiding the installation of some taller poles. Exhibit 4 shows a typical pole that would be
used in this option, with a 69 kV circuit only, located along 3rd
Street.
Exhibit 4: A typical pole with only 69 kV circuit
The existing 12 kV line would be placed underground in this option. The additional
infrastructure required would also impact the neighbourhood, while increasing the total
project costs. Considerable design effort would be required to determine appropriate
locations for at-grade transformers and below-grade junction boxes and possible
switchgear. Exhibit 5 presents the typical pad-mounted equipment often required to
provide for an underground distribution system, while Exhibit 6 is the at-grade view of
the cover for below-grade equipment. The below-grade footprint is likely to be three
times that of the visible cover, and may conflict with adjacent underground structures.
Technical Review of Route Options Page 5 April 23, 2013
Exhibit 5 At-grade Transformer for Underground 12 kV System
Exhibit 6 Below-grade Mounted Switchgear for Underground 12 kV System
These structures, when retrofitted, require considerable redesign of the existing system
and will result in extensive disruptive construction activity in the neighbourhood.
Technical Review of Route Options Page 6 April 23, 2013
3.3 St. David’s Avenue - Underground New 69 kV Line, Maintain Existing 12 kV Line
This option would maintain the existing pole height, but would require a complex design,
increased construction activity, and will require additional poles. The poles are required
for cable terminations and disconnect switches. As seen in Exhibit 7, the constructed
poles present considerable visual and land use impact on their neighbourhood.
Exhibit 7: Typical Multiple poles
These installations are costly due to the requisite larger size of right-of-way, complex
engineering design, and necessary specialized materials and construction techniques. In
addition, this option would likely require long procurement lead times for cable and
equipment.
For these reasons, this option would not be viable to successfully maintain 69 kV service
throughout the construction period or to meet the project schedule. Both of these
factors would contribute to significantly increased project total cost. Due to the existence
of multiple utility service connections and limited space availability, this route is not likely
to have the required corridor space for the proposed underground and overhead lines.
Technical Review of Route Options Page 7 April 23, 2013
3.4 Eastern Routes Parallel to Low Level Road
Exhibit 8 demonstrates that there is insufficient space to the south of the Low Level Road
to accommodate a new overhead line. In our opinion, the size of the available land
corridor is inadequate to meet 69 kV clearance requirements.
Exhibit 8: South of the Low Level Road
To the north of the Low Level Road it is technically feasible to construct a new 69 kV line.
However this would require placing the line through the City’s Moodyville Park,
necessitating removal of a wide corridor of trees, and permission from the City.
3.5 Port Metro Property Route
There is an existing 69kV line located on the west side of the Port Metro property, coming
down St. George’s Avenue and crossing East Esplanade, as seen in Exhibit 9. The existing
line travels to the Port Metro property to serve the Vancouver Drydock Substation.
Technical Review of Route Options Page 8 April 23, 2013
Exhibit 9: St. George’s Avenue and East Esplanade
This alternative would see a new line interconnected to the Vancouver Drydock
Substation and extended east across Port Metro. There are two routes presented here.
The first example extends the line on Port Metro property up to the convergence of the
railroad lines and then travels north to Alder Street, east along Alder to St. David’s
Avenue, and heads south to cross the Low Level Road to the Richardson substation. The
second example travels east along the southern perimeter to the Richardson substation.
It needs to be noted that this option would require the acquisition of railway crossing
permits and Rights-of-Way from Port Metro in favour of BC Hydro. Those processes can
be lengthy and complicated and must be included in early planning estimates.
a) After leaving the Drydock Substation, the line runs parallel and south of the railroad
until it is south of Alder Street to the north. At that point, due mainly to the
convergence of multiple railroad lines, the 69 kV line would cross three railroad lines
and the Low Level Road, and head north to the Spirit Trail. The Exhibit 10 map below
outlines the route location (blue) and shows the completed Spirit Trail (mustard).
Technical Review of Route Options Page 9 April 23, 2013
Exhibit 10: Port Metro Property - Route A
Exhibit 11 shows the Vancouver Drydock Substation, looking east along East Esplanade.
Implementing this option would require considerable tree removal along the Spirit Trail,
encounter difficulty anchoring lines for crossing the tracks, and once installed would
present a large visual impact on the neighbourhood. For these reasons, this option is
not likely to be viable.
Technical Review of Route Options Page 10 April 23, 2013
Exhibit 11: Vancouver Drydock Substation Looking East
b) An alternative example is to construct the 69 kV line from the Drydock Substation
going east and remaining on Port Metro property through to the Richardson
Substation. Seen in Exhibit 12, the route passes south of the railroad and the large dry
dock buildings.
Exhibit 12: Vancouver Drydock Substation Looking East on Port Metro Property
Technical Review of Route Options Page 11 April 23, 2013
Exhibit 13 shows this alternate route, turning south after the dry dock buildings, and
then heading east again, parallel to the southern-most track, towards the Richardson
Substation.
Exhibit 13: Port Metro Property – Route B
Constructing any alternative within Port Metro property would place the new 69 kV line
in an industrial zone, and would likely have limited visual impact on the surrounding
neighbourhood.
This option may require some track removal near the Richardson Substation and
undergrounding a portion of the 69 kV. CSA Standard CSA C22.3-7-10, and BC Hydro
ES54 H4 provide some guidance regarding underground installations on railway rights-
of-way. Several other project issues would arise and the time needed by the parties to
reach the necessary agreements is not in the proposed schedule. It would be prudent,
Technical Review of Route Options Page 12 April 23, 2013
however, in the design for the relocation of the Richardson Substation, to try and
accommodate possible future 69 kV supply locations.
4 Pole Replacement
This project provides the opportunity to upgrade the existing poles and avoid ongoing
intermittent pole replacement that would otherwise be required over the coming years.
As shown in Exhibit 14, the existing poles have years of ground-line and pole butt
treatment (date tags and treatment ingress points are seen here) and are ready for
replacement. Replacing these poles at this time to include 69 kV lines would be cost-
effective and minimize the long-term construction impact on the neighbourhood.
Exhibit 14 Distribution Pole for Replacement
5 Conclusion
Given the constraints placed on this project, the proposed BC Hydro/Port Metro preferred
design is the most viable selection. The project, as designed, will maintain 69 kV service
throughout construction and installation, can be coordinated successfully with other Low
Technical Review of Route Options Page 13 April 23, 2013
Level Road reconstruction activity, and will not likely pose any budget overrun risks due to
complex engineering or equipment installation.
The designers have confirmed that this project is designed in accordance with BC Hydro
Standards ES 43, ES 53, ES 54, and ES 41. BC Hydro standard ES 43 applies to the railway
crossing, and CSA C22.3 No 1 applies to the appropriate clearance requirements.
It is the Reviewer’s opinion that implementing the BC Hydro/Port Metro preferred design
along St. David’s Avenue does not preclude the development, at some time in the future,
of an electricity transmission line located exclusively on Port Metro Property. As Pacific
Rim export demand continues to grow, it can be expected that Port Metro will pursue
material handling efficiency improvements that will require additional power. Planning
and design of any major Port Metro facility expansion or retrofit should consider
integrating on site power delivery and supply. Port Metro Property – Routes A and B are
examples of onsite routes.
Successful upgrades to the port will need to integrate power supply into the early project
planning stages. This would be beneficial to the long-term planning of BC Hydro, Port
Metro, and the City of North Vancouver.