Portland Community College€¦ · Portland Community College Monthly Report-01 Facilities Plan – Phase 1 December 23, 2016 2 Space Utilization Work Group 12.23.16: Summary of activities:

Portland Community College

Facilities Plan - Phase 1

Monthly Report

December 23, 2016

Portland Community College Monthly Report-01

Facilities Plan – Phase 1 December 23, 2016

1

Summary The sections in this monthly report outline the status for each work group up through the current

month. This addresses the key activities, areas of focus, outstanding questions or information requests

and the next steps. The next month report notes would follow as shown on the first work group to track

progress from month to month. A work group summary may be followed directly with a team consultant

report update.

Overall Project Outstanding Items:

1. Team Access to the Google Drives will be critical for distributing project information and for

team communications.

Contents Space Utilization Work Group ....................................................................................................................... 2

Facilities Condition Work Group ................................................................................................................... 3

Capital Projects Work Group ........................................................................................................................ 5

Safety and Security ....................................................................................................................................... 6

Transportation and Parking Work Group ..................................................................................................... 7

Information Technology Work Group ........................................................................................................... 8

ADA Work Group........................................................................................................................................... 9

Sustainability Work Group .......................................................................................................................... 10

Draft Schedule for site visits (attached) ...................................................................................................... 11



2

Space Utilization Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Key Focus for month: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Outstanding Items: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

Next Steps: See attached summary from Tom Hier of Biddison Hier.

01.27.17: (future notes to track progress from month to month)

Summary of activities:

Key Focus for month: PCC

Outstanding Items: PCC

Next Steps: PCC

Chair Members Consultant Team

Kurt Simonds

Dean of Instruction

Cascade Campus

Laura Massey

Tonya Booker

Tricia Brand

Ken Dodge

Karen Sanders

Tatyana Batazhan

Nita Posada (SRG)

Robert Lochner (SRG)

Tom Hier (Biddison Hier)

BIDDISON HIER, LTD. Consultants to Higher Education 1515 Fifteenth Street, NW Ste 613 Washington, DC 20011 202.882.8700 202.726.2251 fax www.biddhier.com

15 December 2016

Memorandum To: Kurt Simonds From: Tom Hier RE: Space Utilization Analyses – Additional Thoughts and Next Steps This memo is a follow-up to our 29 November teleconference, where we reviewed scope of the space utilization assessment and data issues. During our teleconference, there were essentially two significant areas of discussion regarding the scope of space utilization analyses, as follows: The range of space types (e.g., academic, administrative, instructional) to include in our space

utilization assessments as well as the nature of the analyses to undertake.

For instructional spaces, how to organize data for reporting (e.g., by physical campus location; campus budgetary authority).

For your review and comment, I have summarized below what I believe we concluded, identified areas where further information is necessary, and set out some next steps.

2

1 Range o f Spa ce Type s t o I n c l u de i n Spa ce Ut i l i z a t i on As s e s smen t s

While the initial focus of our work was to assess space utilization for regularly-scheduled instructional space – and this remains the primary focus – we also discussed the utility of having better information on the amount and type of space available in other space categories on each campus. The chart below outlines these different space types and the associated analyses that may be useful for each.

To summarize:

General and Academic Administrative Space: Analyze square footage allocations (e.g., per person, per department) for the primary types of administrative space – offices, conference rooms and support spaces.

Regularly‐scheduled Instructional Space: Evaluate room and seat utilization and other standard performance metrics for regularly-scheduled instructional space.

Event Space: Catalog the various event spaces across PCC and, where possible, provide qualitative insights into their use. By their nature, activities that occur in event spaces are generally not regularly-scheduled, vary widely from week to week, can have widely variable attendance, and lack complete data on each event. So it is not possible to quantify utilization in any meaningful way. Nonetheless, there was consensus that having more complete knowledge of what event spaces exist across the institution would be helpful.

Student Support Space: As is the case with event space, catalog the various student support spaces across PCC and, where possible, provide qualitative insights into their use.

Please confirm that this is your understanding of the approach that we should adopt. We are currently trying to discover what space data are available, and obviously the ability to create the analyses noted here will be dependent on the nature and completeness of PCC space datasets.

6

Proposed Scope Revisions Based on October Steering Committee Meeting

General

Administrative

Space

Offices

Conference rooms

Support spaces

Academic

Administrative

Space

Offices

Conference rooms

Support spaces

Regularly‐

Scheduled

Instructional

SpaceClassrooms

Teaching Labs

Event

Space

Meeting rooms

Assembly spaces

Student

Support Space

Community space

Student service space

Tutoring space

Advising offices

Space Types Included

Nature of Analyses

Analysis of current utilization

Develop Instructional Space Master Plan

Record space data

Gather qualitative information on use

Record space data

Gather qualitative information on use

Square footage allocation analyses, e.g.:

Per person

Per department

Per Campus

Square footage allocation analyses, e.g.:

Per person

Per department

Per Campus

3

2 Organ i z i ng Da ta f o r Repo r t i n g on Regu l a r l y ‐Schedu l ed I n s t r u c t i on a l Spa ce s Regularly-scheduled instructional activities are held at a variety of locations across the city – some directly at the campuses, some at major centers, and others at satellite locations. Regardless of physical location, all courses are also generally associated with one of the following campuses or areas (called “Campus (or Area) of Record” for simplicity) – which we believe to be related in some fashion to budgeting considerations: Cascade

Rock Creek

Sylvania

Southeast

Workforce & Community Education

Educational Services.

A chart in the 29 November presentation, reproduced below, shows the relationship between Campus Physical Locations of Buildings in which courses are held and the Campus or Area of Record above.

Since space utilization analyses are physical in nature, it makes most sense to evaluate space use by Campus Physical Location, and in our discussions on 29 November, the group concurred with this approach. There may also be situations, however, where it is helpful to look at utilization by Campus or Area of Record.

4

Accordingly, the following steps are required to prepare for analyses. Step 1. Simplify the number of physical locations and determine which – if any – to exclude from analyses.

In the chart above, there are 25 distinct categories of physical location, some with very few courses identified. The table below offers an initial attempt at collapsing these 25 categories into 14 categories. Detailed lists of courses included in each category are provided in an attached Excel spreadsheet. (Each aggregated physical location is a separate tab in the Excel file.) Please review the aggregation and confirm or suggest updates, as required. Further, it seems obvious that the first 11 major categories would be included in analyses. There is a question about how to handle categories 12 (Distance Learning), 13 (Off-Campus) and 14 (Null or Other – TBD). Please review courses in the Excel spreadsheet associated with these categories and advise as to how they should be treated for space utilization analyses.

Physical Locations

Physical Location Aggregated Physical Location

1 Cascade Cascade

Cascade (off campus)

2 Rock Creek Rock Creek

Rock Creek (off campus)

3 Southeast Southeast

Southeast (off campus)

4 Sylvania Sylvania

Sylvania (Distance Learning)

Sylvania (off campus)

5 CLIMB Climb Center

6 Downtown Center Downtown Center

7 Hillboro Center Hillsboro Center

8 Metro Center Metro Center (Portland Metropolitian Workforce Training Center)

9 Newberg Center Newberg Center

10 Swan Island Trades Center Swan Island Trades Center

11 Willow Creek Willow Creek Center

12 Distance Learning Distance Learning (Community Education)

Distance Learning (for Newberg Center)

Distance Learning (PCC District)

13 Off‐Campus Off Campus

Off Campus (PCC District Wide)

14 Null or Other ‐‐ TBD Columbia Center

Null ‐ location to be determined

Open Campus (PCC District Wide)

TBD

5

Step 2. Analyzing by Physical Location vs. Campus of Record.

Beyond analyzing space utilization by physical location, are there analyses that should be done by Campus or Area of Record? For example, there are a substantial number of courses associated with the Workforce and Community Education area, which are spread among various campuses and centers (e.g., CLIMB, Southeast, Sylvania, Willow Creek). Please consider what types of analyses might be desirable and informative, and advise how to proceed. 3 Nex t S t ep s In preparation for our next meeting sometime in mid-January, it would be helpful to address the issues raised in this memo, and to obtain guidance on and resolution of as many open questions as possible. To that end, would it be possible to schedule time for a short phone call before the holiday to review this memo with you, address any questions you have, and figure out how best to get these issues resolved? Thank you. Attachment

Excel file include course lists by major campus physical location CC:

Bryan Higgins, SRG Nita Posada, SRG



3

Facilities Condition Assessment Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: The Facilities Work Group has met every 2 weeks since 10/31/16.

Key Focus for month: Reviewing existing material and organizing site visits. See attached schedule for

draft dates from each consultant. The schedule indicates which consultants will need to access buildings

and which consultants will focus on site only visits and may not need as much assistance.

Outstanding Items: All Consultants are currently reviewing the existing materials sent that consists of

existing plans and specifications. After review we will develop a list of outstanding items.

Site Visits:

1. PCC will be providing key cards for consultants that need to access buildings during site visits.

2. Coordination will be needed for any needed assistance during site visits.

3. Parking passes will be needed for each consultant group.

PAE: The following is a draft of PAE’s site visit process for each campus.

1. One week ahead of our meeting with PCC FMS staff responsible for maintenance of MEP system

on the particular campus, PAE will send a list with the building names on that campus and the

general questions about MEP systems. If time permits and FMS staff can return responses to

those questions ahead of our on-site meeting that would be great. If not, we can use the list as

an agenda item in our meeting.

2. We would like to ask that PCC assign FMS contact person for each campus and for each

discipline, so we can coordinate equipment testing and contact him or her during assessment

with questions that may come out from our site observations.

3. We propose to start our assessment at Southeast Campus and meet with FMS early in the week,

preferred Monday, January 9th. The person(s) with the most historical knowledge available for

that campus and each discipline should be at the kick-off meeting. We would like our team to

walk the campus with assigned FMS contacts after the meeting so that all PAE team members

are familiar with buildings and the access to rooms and equipment that need to be assessed.

The same day we would like to go through any required orientation, meet with security, get

badges or identifications and be informed of any limitations we may have during the assessment

(any events that may take place on the campus, midterms, areas that are off the limits, etc.). We

do not anticipate that any additional meetings will be required, but we need to be able to follow

up with either email or phone call to FMS contacts and will need our questions answered while


Tony Ichsan

Director

Facilities Support Services

John MacLean

Joe Gamble

Donna Bezio

Mark Erickson

Zahava Jones

Heidi VanBrocklin

Gary Danielson (SRG)

Bryan Higgins (SRG)

Nedzib Biberic (PAE)

Jared Lewis (Catena)

Tom Jaleski (Code Unlimited)

Brady Berry (WH Pacific)

Alex Simpson (WH Pacific)

Melinda Graham (2.ink)



4

we are still working on that campus. It will take us three weeks to finish the work at Southeast

Campus.

4. We would than follow up with the same approach on Rock Creek, Cascade and Sylvania

campuses. We propose to meet with FMS on the following dates:

a. Rock Creek: Friday, January 27th.

b. Cascade: Friday, February 24th.

c. Sylvania: Friday, March 17th.

5. We anticipate that we will be able to assess two PCC centers per week. Please see attached

schedule for proposed times that we would be at each center. Similar what we are proposing for

campuses, we will provide questions to FMS staff on centers (at least a week prior to our site

visit).

PAE will need the following from PCC:

• FMS contacts for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems on each individual

campus.

• Contacts for outside firms maintaining MEP equipment and permission to contact

them regarding equipment they maintain.

• Contacts for Fire Alarm Vendors and permission to contact them.

• One year of utility bills for all buildings (water, electricity, gas or propane).

• Existing facility assessment reports.

• Existing commissioning reports.

• We received one energy audit report for Sylvania campus. If energy audit reports are

available for other campuses and sites, we would need those as well.

• Balancing reports completed within last 12 months.

• Hydrant flow test completed within last 12 months.

Next Steps: PCC



5

Capital Projects Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: The SRG Planning Team has sent pricing packages for the Tier I and select Tier II

bond projects to RLB for pricing as follows:

Tier I

01 Health Professions / IPT Building – Combined with 04 IT Location

02 Metro Center

03 OMIC Columbia County Center – Awaiting on PCC to provide original estimate, this will be a

verification from an existing report. We will send as soon as we receive from PCC sometime next week.

04 IT Location – Combined with 01 Health Professions / IPT Building

05 Cascade Public Safety Building

06 Sylvania Site Improvements

07 Student Housing Feasibility Study – Removed from scope

08 Rock Creek Events Center Parking Lot- Verification from existing estimate

09 Sylvania Health Technologies Building – This was previously a verification item, the scope has been

slightly modified since previous estimate was completed

Tier II

01 Sylvania Makerspace – Removed from Scope

02 Rock Creek CTE Building

03 Rock Creek Makerspace – Removed from scope

04 Hillsboro Center

05 Downtown Center

Key Focus for month: RLB will be pricing the bond projects package over the next 2-1/2 weeks and SRG

will field any questions.

Outstanding Items: NA

Next Steps: A meeting is scheduled with PCC to review the pricing on 1/6/17 prior to the January board

meeting.


Linda Degman

Director

Bond Program

Zahava Jones

Debra Jarcho

Rebecca Ocken

Gary Sutton

Tony Ichsan

Nita Posada (SRG)

Jason Karam (SRG)

Susan Gust (SRG)



6

Safety and Security Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: A proposal from Layne Consultants was sent out for comment 11/16/16. The

work group reviewed the proposal in a conference call on 12/20/16. Everyone agreed that the proposal

addressed the scope of work expected by PCC. However, PCC would like to look at an additional scope of

work for standards development. Layne will send this to the team as a separate item for review.

Key Focus for month: Layne Consultants are currently reviewing the existing materials sent that consists

of existing plans and specifications.

Outstanding Items: Layne Consultants are currently reviewing the existing materials sent that consists

of existing plans and specifications. After review we will develop a list of outstanding items.

1. Stantec’s Basis of Design document for review

Next Steps: During the last conference call we are looking at the schedule for the first site visit.

Site Visit #1: January 10th – 13th. This would include campus site visits followed by a meeting with Derrick

Foxworth and team for review.


Derrick Foxworth

Director

Public Safety

Debra Jarcho

Alan Bral

Mike Sturgill

Kevin Crowley

Tony Ichsan

Neal Naigus

Ryan Aiello


Bryan Higgins (SRG)

Rob Layne (Layne)

Mark Peterson (Layne)



7

Transportation and Parking Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: The Transportation and Parking Work Group has met every 2 weeks since

10/31/16. During this time the scope has been refined and included in the overall project proposal for

review.

Key Focus for month: The meetings for this month have focused on completing the key strategies and

developing a cost benefit matrix. See attached draft strategies table under development.



Next Steps: Through investigating the existing materials develop clear site plans of each campus to base

site visits and findings on.


Kathleen McMullen

Manager

Transportation and Parking

Karissa Nickerson

Wendy Palmer

Jennifer deLaix

Mark Gorman

Michael Kuehn

Narce Rodriguez

Dean Halley

Bryan Higgins (SRG)


Todd Mobley (Lancaster)

Miranda Wells (Lancaster)

Phil Worth (Kittelson)

Portland Community College

Master Plan

Lancaster Engineering

DRAFT December 2016

Portland Community College Master Plan

Transportation and Parking

Portland Community College Master Plan – Transportation and Parking 1

Strategies There are many policy changes that are not easy to evaluate with a cost estimate or a broad benefit analysis as the solutions that were identified

in the previous section. These are broader strategies to reach the goals The advisory team reviewed the 2012 TDM and identified the most

relevant stratgies to prioritize based on the updated existing conditions and staff availability and capabilities. The recommended strategies are

outlined in Table X

Strategy Implementation Recommendations Maintenance and Expansion Considerations

Add additional

resources to the PCC

transportation and

parking team

• Hire one full-time (1 FTE) staff member to be an ambassador

• Hire one full-time (1 FTE) staff member to be an active

transportation lead

• Two additional FTE for maintenance for evenings for shuttle

services

• Additional drivers to support additional higher shuttle frequency

and longer hours

• Additional office support staff for transportation and parking

department

• Additional enforcement staff (2 FTE) for transportation and

parking

• New grant for ambassador and active

transportation lead covers the first two

years, but funding needs to be extended

forever and ever

• These staff needs are without any

additional strategies applied, additional

strategies applied may require additional

staff.

Improve the method at

which to incorporate

transportation

solutions into other

projects

• Integrate campus and center needed improvement into local

agency projects where possible:

-Powell/Division

-SW Corridor

-Springville

-Planning and Policy Plans (i.e., transportation safety action plans,

transportation system plans)

• New campus and centers input from transportation and parking

department at early stages

• Ensure staff dedicated to this…

Long-term evaluation

of impact to changing

parking fees and

structure

• Conduct a detailed study to evaluate costs and impacts for

parking fee increases.

• Identify methods that allow flexibility in parking fees by campuses

and centers.

• Negotiate language in union contract to allow for more flexibility

for staff parking fees.

• Set-up so that changes can be on-going…

Integrate

transportation specific

guidelines for new PCC

buildings, campuses,

and centers and have

transportation input

sooner for new

infrastructure

• All new infrastructure should include bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and

safe crossings.

• All new infrastructure should include safe bicycle storage areas

and showers if size is large enough.

• All new infrastructure should exceed ADA guidelines. – paths from

parking to building (meet owner standards and needs of the

population)

• Throw in power and communication as you go – create plan

Integrate new

technology solutions

for parking (i.e., pay by

space, license plate

reader)

• Learn from the work OHSU?? And PSU?? LPR System is currently

doing to integrate these technologies into their parking.

• Build the capital cost for these solutions into longer term plans

(i.e., PCC Master Plan).

• Require new or expanding campuses and centers to build systems

in as they are constructing new infrastructure.

Shift locations for

programs (i.e., nursing

from Sylvania to off-

site facility)

• Evaluate high attendance programs and minimize the overlap of

these programs at the same locations and times.

Create a district wide

communications plan

for transportation

options

• Hire an ambassador who’s primary job is getting communication

out about transportation options – been funded… but needs to

carry on

• Reintegrate discussion of transportation options into welcome

day, new employee orientation,

• Transportation solutions in permit renewal email and other mass

email options

• Create a transportation communications plan

• Partnering with other district services

Make alternative

modes to single

occupancy vehicles

more attractive for

employees

• Integrate a wellness incentive program in for employees.

• Highly subsidize transit passes.

• Increase frequency of shuttle services to better serve staff

schedules.

• Add shuttle stops at centers.

• Integrate a guaranteed ride home program.

Improve facilities to

support alternative

modes for students

and employees

• More showers at campuses and centers.

• More bike storage at campuses and centers.

•

Redo the Shuttle

Program

• Create hubs at each campus.

• Develop a program that allows the shuttle service to operate as a

typical transit program:

o Keep maintenance in house

o Hire dipatch service

o Integrate additional technology into shuttles

Housing next to

campus

• Use land that PCC owns next to Sylvania to build housing

• Evaluate purchases of land near other campuses for building

housing

• Guidelines for new campuses to buy additional land for building

housing near the campus

Add additional electric

vehicle stations

• Build infrastructure as you go

Improve pedestrian,

bicycle, and ADA

infrastructure to

buildings

• Path from all the way back to the buildings for all modes

• Make sure new projects coming in integrate improvements (i.e.,

SW corridor improving ADA and implementing ped, and bike

improvements from transit stops to buildings)

• Add additional ADA spots



8

Information Technology Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: A third revision to the Vantage Consultants proposal was reviewed by the work

group on 12/5/16 and was generally approved, just needed one final review.

Key Focus for month: Once Vantage has access to the existing information from Google Drive they can

start to review and provide comments on other outstanding information needed for review.

Outstanding Items:

Vantage: At least 3 weeks prior to the initial site visit vantage will need the following information:

1. IT specific info which was being provided by the stakeholders on the Google Drive

2. A list of TRs and other spaces for each building

a. A list has been sent by PCC, attached is a pass at locating these to buildings

b. 88 IDF’s identified

c. There are (10) UPS locations which had names not matching named buildings in the

building list

d. 21 buildings currently are listed with no IDFs

3. The rest of the items we requested in our proposal’s Methodology section

4. Schedule of the unavailable dates for district’s facilities staff and other essential team members,

as well as the Districts’ preferred site visit schedule.

Next Steps: PCC will provide Vantage with additional comments to the proposal. Vantage will start

looking at scheduling their first site visits based on getting the information mentioned above.


Michael Northover,

Chief Information Officer

Information Technology

Val Moreno

Debra Jarcho

James Reece

Ed Hawkins

Payam Damghani

Andy Freed

Kevin Edwards

Charmagne Ehrenhaus

Hank Schottland

Bryan Higgins (SRG)

Bjorn Clouten (SRG)

Richard Bussell (Vantage)

Ken Godachy (Vantage)

Jon Young (Vantage)

VANTAGE TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING GROUP

Campus TR Reconciliation list

Cells in YELLOW indicate buildings without currently identied Technology Rooms or IDFs

Please verify Qty or indicate as N/A

Campus Qty of TRs

Building

Abbrev Building Name

Building

AiM

Number

UPS LOCATIONS

(Unmatched) Actual Building name

SY Campus General Campus 1000GC

SY 1 AM Automotive Metals 1010 CA EP BDF

SY ASB Automotice Storage Building 1015 CA PG BDF

SY 1 BK Bookstore 1020 CP MDF

SY 5 CC College Center 1030 SE AA BDF

SY 2 CSB College Services Building 1040 SE AS BDF

SY 2 CT Communication Technology 1050 SE AS IDF1

SY 1 HP Heat Plant 1060 SE LC BDF

SY 3 HT Health Technology 1070 SE LC IDF1

SY Gate House SE NP BDF

SY 2 LRC Library 1080 SE WP BDF

SY 1 PAC Performing Arts Center 1090

SY 1 SCB South Classroom Building 1100

SY 2 SS Social Science 1110

SY 2 ST Science Technology 1120

SY 4 TCB Technology Classroom Building 1130

CA Campus General Campus 2000GC

CA 3 CH Cascade Hall 2005

CA 2 JH Jackson Hall 2010

CA 2 MAHB Moriarty Arts and Humanities Building 2020

CA 1 PEB Physical Education Building 2030

CA 1 PSEB Public Service Education Building 2040

CA 1 PS Public Safety 2050

CA SC Student Center & Library 2060

CA 2 SSB Student Services Building 2070

CA 3 SU Student Union 2075

CA 3 TEB Technology Education Building 2080

CA 2 TH Terrell Hall 2090

CA KB Kanjaya Building 2100

CA 1 PB Paragon Club 2110

CA UGP Underground Parking 2120

RC Campus General Campus 3000GC

RC 1 B1 Building 1 3010








RC KEN Kennel 3110

UPS LOCATIONS in BLUE indicate locations named differently than Building Abbrev. Please provide correct Building name.

RC Care Takers Dwelling None

RC Farm Storage Building None

RC Farm Shop Building None

RC Farm Shop Building None

RC Barn None

RC New Shop Building None

RC Cattle Builidng None

RC Toilet Building None

RC Pole Building None

RC Green House None

RC Greenhouse (Hoops) None

SE Campus General Campus 4000GC

SE CHA Community Hall Annex 4003

SE LIBR Learning Commons 4005

SE 1 MSH Mount Scott Hall 4010

SE 4 MTH Mount Tabor Hall 4020

SE SAB Southeast Administration Building 4030

SE 3 SCOM Student Commons 4040

CLIMB Campus General Campus 5100GC

CLIMB CLIMB

Continuous Learning for Individuals,

Management and Business 5100

DC Campus General Campus 5200GC

DC 2 DC Downtown Center 5200

HTC Campus General Campus 5300GC

HTC ECB Education Center Building 5300

NB Campus General Campus 5400GC

NB 1 NB Newberg Center 5400

PMWTC Campus General Campus 5500GC

PMWTC 1 B1 Portland Metro Building 1 5500

PMWTC 1 B2 Portland Metro Building 2 5510

WC Campus General Campus 5600GC

WC 4 WC Willow Creek 5600

STC Campus General Campus 5700GC

STC 1 STC Swan Island 5700

CDSB Campus General Campus 6000GC

CDSB 1 CDSB Central Distribution Services Building 6010

TOTAL 88 District-wide Technology spaces



9

ADA Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities:

After meetings on 11/15/16 & 11/29/16 it was determined the ADA scope is the following:

Transportation (Lancaster and Kittelson Engineering): Review existing reports and confirm existing ADA

parking and required ADA parking and locations at all campuses and centers.

Site (SRG & WH Pacific Engineering): Provide an ADA assessment of the existing path of travel from ADA

parking and transit stops to the main entry at each building at all campuses and centers.

Building (SRG & Code Unlimited): Provide a list of applicable codes for accessibility for each of the

buildings. Review drawings of all of the buildings in the inventory for accessibility compliance issues.

Key Focus for month: All Consultants are currently reviewing the existing materials sent that consists of

existing plans and specifications.



Next Steps: Meet with PCC and all consultants involved to review the schedule, scope of work and

outstanding items needed.


Jennifer Gossett

Accessibility Specialist

Disability Services

Wendy Palmer

Donna Bezio

Jody Giffen

Maria Mendez

Kathy McMullen

Alex Baldino

Jason Karam (SRG)


Brady Berry (WH Pacific)

Alex Simpson (WH Pacific)

Tom Jaleski (Code Unlimited)



10

Sustainability Work Group

12.23.16:

Summary of activities: The sustainability Work Group has met several times now and have developed a

scope of work vision as follows:

Version 3. We will develop a Sustainability Plan to include an assessment evaluating current college

systems and guidelines for college practices emphasizing sustainability in seven key areas:

● Energy & Emissions

● College Operations

● Construction & Renovation

● Grounds & Natural Systems

● Health & Well-being

● Education & Culture

● Resiliency

Key Focus for month:

Outstanding Items:

Next Steps: Inventory of existing resources and data gaps. Identify where we’re at and goals for the

future.


Briar Schoon

Manager

Sustainability

Laura Ward

Julie Mast

Alyson Lighthart

Elaine Cole

Jack Lussier

Lisa Peterson (SRG)

PCC SITE VISIT SCHEDULE WORK SHEET

TASK DURATION/DATE 0 1 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28

5-11 12-18 19-25 26-1 2-8 9-15 16-22 23-29 30-6 7-13 21-27 28-3 4-10 11-17 18-24 25-1

CAMPUSSYLVANIA (14 Bldgs: 886,286sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne 1/10-1/13

Code Unlimited

2.ink

ROCKCREEK (20 Bldgs: 595,026sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (2/6-2/8)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

SOUTHEAST (6 Bldgs: 228,455sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (2/6-2/8)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

CASCADE (14 Bldgs: 517,148sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (3/13-3/15)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

MAR

1-7 8-14 15-21 22-28 29-4 5-11 12-18 19-25 26-4

JAN FEBDEC

13 23

2017

11

2016

8 9 10 122 4 5 6 7

November 28, 2016

2017

APR MAY JUN

14-20

3 weeks

4 weeks

3 weeks

4 weeks

PCC MASTER PLAN PROJECT SCHEDULE SRG PARTNERSHIP, INC.



5-11 12-18 19-25 26-1 2-8 9-15 16-22 23-29 30-6 7-13 21-27 28-3 4-10 11-17 18-24 25-1

CENTERCLIMB (35,646sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (2/6)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

DOWNTOWN (43,595sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (3/14)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

NEWBERG (12,880sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (1/10)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

SWAN ISLAND (22,517sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (2/6)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

23

2016 2017 2017

2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

DEC JAN FEB MAR APR

14-20

November 28, 2016

JUN

1-7 8-14 15-21 22-28 29-4 5-11 12-18 19-25 26-4

MAY

11 12 13



5-11 12-18 19-25 26-1 2-8 9-15 16-22 23-29 30-6 7-13 21-27 28-3 4-10 11-17 18-24 25-1

CENTERHILLSBORO (9,522sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne

Code Unlimited

2.ink

METRO (32,570sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (2/6)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

WILLOW CREEK (95,308sf)

SRG

PAE

Catena

WH Pacific

Vantage

Lancaster

Kittelson

Layne (3/14)

Code Unlimited

2.ink

November 28, 2016

2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 23

2016 2017 2017

DEC JAN FEB MAR APR

14-20

JUN

1-7 8-14 15-21 22-28 29-4 5-11 12-18 19-25 26-4

MAY

Documents

Portland Community College€¦ · Portland Community College Monthly Report-01 Facilities Plan – Phase 1 December 23, 2016 2 Space Utilization Work Group 12.23.16: Summary of activities: