Click here to load reader
Upload
doandien
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Student Name ___________________ Score _______/ 12
Portfolio Rubric: AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (Portfolio is 20% of MP grade)
Element Descriptions of levels of performance:
1 -‐ 2 -‐ 3 -‐ 4 -‐ Cornell Notes • Notes are not in Cornell format
• Paper appears to have been scrunched, put through a blender, or used as a napkin
• Notes only cover a part of the selection.
• Notes are a word for word reporting of materials.
• Notes contain at least 2-‐4 relevant questions.
• Key concepts are missing • Key concepts do not relate to the main ideas of the notes.
• Only section headings or bold words are used.
• Summary re-‐states the notes. • Summary is not connected to learning
• Notes cover most of the selection, but are missing a part.
• Some essential information or concepts are missing.
• Important and/or unknown words are not defined.
• Notes are NOT a word for word reporting of materials.
• Notes contain at least 5 relevant questions, none of which require higher level thinking skills.
• Key concepts capture some ideas from the notes.
• Key concepts are copied out of the book (section headings or bold words)
• Summary demonstrates some learning by identifying some main ideas.
• Notes and questions are in the right column; key concepts are in the left column, summary is at the bottom.
• Notes cover the entire selection. • Essential information and concepts are clearly captured.
• Important and/or unknown words are clearly defined.
• Notes are NOT a word for word reporting of materials.
• Notes contain at least 5 relevant questions addressing the selection.
• 3 of the questions require higher level thinking skills.
• Key concepts accurately capture the main idea of the notes.
• Summary shows learning by connecting main ideas.
• Summary connects selection to broader learning from class.
All of 3, and includes: • Exceptional organization or
neatness. • Clear that extra time was spent on
the notes. • Notes are notably thorough. • Everything is written in student’s
own words based on his/her complete understanding.
• Notes contain noticeably more relevant questions.
• Questions are unique. • All questions require higher level
thinking • Notes contain noticeably more
relevant questions.
Laboratory Investigations
• Student is continuously absent for lab investigations and does not make up on their own time
• Student does not participate in lab activities.
• Student does not include lab sheets in portfolio.
• Student partially participates in lab activities, spends some time during lab investigations on other tasks.
• Student partially completes lab sheets included in portfolio or they are illegible and unrecognizable
• Student actively participates in lab activity.
• All lab sheets are accurately completed, graphing analysis and extension questions have been given thought.
• When asked, student can describe what they are doing, what they are looking to show/prove, and prediction
All of 3, and includes: • When asked, student can describe
what they are doing, what they are looking to show/prove, and prediction
• Students find errors in labs, and troubleshoot ways to improve on laboratory technique
Journal Entries • Journal entries are incomplete, missing, and it is apparent that little time has bas been put into thinking about topics.
• Answers are superficial and do not reflect thoughtful consideration or reflect important aspects of the student's life or experiences or are irrelevant to the issues in the journal or the chapter
• Answers are vague, but appear to be sincere attempts to answer the questions; they demonstrate some understanding of course material, but the journal does not clearly connect the student's life to course content.
• Answers reflect honest, thoughtful responses that are linked to the student's own life and experiences AND that go beyond just answering the questions by connecting the student's experiences to the chapter/course material