PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE BLACK SEA REGION · Information System (APCIS), PSC information system for the Tokyo MOU, which was also developed by the Russian Federation. The BSIS provides

PORT STATE CONTROLIN THE BLACK SEA REGION

Annual Report 2017

BLACK SEA PORT STATE CONTROL SECRETARIAT

ISTANBUL / TURKEY

This work may be reproduced in whole or part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of thesource but not for commercial usage or sale.

Further information may be obtained from:

Black Sea Port State Control SecretariatBeylerbeyi Mahallesi, Abdullahağa Caddesi, Kıyı Emniyeti Genel MüdürlüğüNo: 16A Kat: 3 Oda: 326 Üsküdar 34676 Istanbul / TurkeyTel : +90 (216) 342 58 87Fax : +90 (216) 334 34 83e-mail : [email protected] : www.bsmou.org

This report will be available at www.bsmou.org

DISCLAIMER

The inspection and detention data in this publication are derived from data input by the memberAuthorities. The BS MOU (its member Authorities, the Secretariat and BSIS Manager) will not beheld liable for any loss, damage or harm resulting from the use of information contained in thispublication, or any reliance on the data accuracy, completeness or timeliness.

PSC IN THE BLACK SEA REGION Annual Report 2017

İ

Foreword

We are pleased to present the seventeenth issue of the Annual Report on Port State Control in the Black Sea region

which is published under the auspices of the Port State Control Committee of the Black Sea MOU.

Port State Control is of particular importance to the BS MOU member Authorities due to the role of shipping in

region’s trade, the sensitivity of the Black Sea basin and its coastline to environmental damage. PSC inspections

are conducted to ensure that foreign ships visiting the Black Sea ports are seaworthy, do not pose a pollution risk,

provide a healthy and safe environment and comply with relevant international regulations and within the scope of

the member Authorities’ national governing laws and regulations.

This PSC Annual report covers the period between 1st January and 31st December 2017. During this period the BS

MOU member Authorities conducted a total of 5,112 inspections, representing 0.9 per cent increase as compared

with 5,066 initial inspections in 2016. The regional inspection rate is 71.1% which is 1.3 per cent increase as

compared with 2016. A total of 283 detentions were warranted to ships found with serious deficiencies. This

represents a detention percentage of 5.54% which is 23.58 per cent increase as compared with 229 detentions in

2016.

During 2017 a total of 21,006 deficiencies were recorded. The average number of deficiencies per inspection was

4.11; resulting in a 0.5 deficiency point increase.

The most significant number of operational deficiencies found in 2017 was in the area of safety of navigation, life

saving appliances followed by health protection, medical care, social security followed by fire safety measures

and structural conditions which constitutes 56.3% of the total deficiencies found.

International Safety Management (ISM) related issues accounted for 7.59 per cent of all detainable deficiencies in

the 2017 reporting period which is 0.68 per cent decrease compared with 2016. Thereby this area remains a

significant concern and the BS MOU continues to scrutinize vessels coming into region for weaknesses in their

Safety Management Systems.

In further promoting safety and environment protection, Concentrated Inspection Campaign(CIC)s are conducted

in conjunction with the Paris and Tokyo Memorandas. Between 1st September 2017 and 30th November 2017, a CIC

was carried out with respect to the Safety of Navigation including ECDIS with the Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, IO MOU

and Vinã del Mar Agreement.

Through the launching new inspection scheme the BS MOU will further increase the pressure on the substandard

ships to encourage them to improve their performance or to force them to leave the region.

Mr. Hayri HASANDAYIOGLUChairmanBS MOU PSC Committee

Hüseyin YÜCESecretary BS MOU Secretariat

Number of Detentions 329 278 286 249 215 184 151 218 229 283

Deficencies / Inspection 4.87 4.76 4.35 4.13 3.89 3.74 3.60 3.62 3.61 4.11

Detainable Deficiencies / Detention 4.47 4.09 4.37 3.54 3.11 3.42 3.35 3.37 3.59 3.39

10 Year Summary of Inspection, Detentions and Deficiency Rate

Annual Report 2017 PSC IN THE BLACK SEA REGION

İİ

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Number of Inspections 5161 4805 4929 4657 4607 5080 5092 4997 5066 5112

Detention % 6.37 5.79 5.80 5.35 4.67 3.62 2.97 4.36 4.52 5.54

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Number of Deficiencies 25118 22885 21464 19255 17916 19022 18350 18094 18266 21006

Deficiencies / Inspection 7.17 7.12 6.73 6.10 5.97 5.75 6.01 6.40 6.42 6.96with Deficiencies

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Number of Detainable Deficiencies 1472 1136 1251 881 669 630 506 734 822 962


1

Table of Contents

Foreword

2017 Annual ReportOverview

Port State Control Committee

Black Sea Information System (BSIS)

Concentrated Inspection Campaign

Training

Interregional Cooperation

PSC Inspections 2017Regional Inspection Data

Inspection Data by Authority

Inspection Data by Flag

Inspection Data by Recognized Organization

Inspection Data by Ship Type

Inspection Data by Deficiency

2017 Maritime Labour Convention Results

Port State Inspection Data for 2017

Statistical Data 2015-2017

List of TablesTable 1- Summary of 2017 Inspection and Trends as Compared with the Previous Year

Table 2- Inspection Data by Authority and Region

Table 3- Inspections Data by Ship Risk Profile

Table 4- Top 5 Inspections by Flag of the Ships

Table 5- 2017 Detentions Per Flag, Exceeding Average Detention Percentage

Table 6- 2017 MLC Results by Ship Flag, Ship Type and Ship Age

Table 7- Inspection Data by Flag

Table 8- Inspection Data by Recognized Organizations

Table 9- Inspection Data by Ship Type

Table 10- Inspection Data by Type of Deficiencies

List of FiguresFigure 1- Inspection and Detention Rates by Authority and Region

Figure 2- Share of Inspections, Inspections with Deficiencies and Detentions of Members as

Percentage of Regional Total

Figure 3- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Deficiencies by the Flags

Figure 4- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of RO Related Detentions and to the Share of

RO Related Detainable Deficiencies

Figure 5- Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Share of Deficiencies for Ship Types

with Detentions

İ

22

3

4

4

5

5

66

6

8

10

10

12

12

14

19

6

7

8

8

9

13

14

16

17

18

7

7

9

10

11


2

2017 Annual ReportOverview

The Governments of Black Sea States in the “Strategic Action Plan for the Rehabilitation and Protection of the BlackSea (adopted at the Ministrial Conference held in Istanbul, 30-31 October, 1996) decided to launch a harmonisedsystem of port State control through the adoption of a Memorandum of Understanding on port State control.

The Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control in the Black Sea Region (BS MOU) was completed andsigned in Istanbul, Turkey on 7 April 2000 by representatives of the Maritime Authorities of Bulgaria, Georgia,Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine.

On December 19, 2000 the Memorandum entered into force in the Black Sea region for three maritime Statesaccepted the BS MOU. By December 12, 2002 the BS MOU entered into effect for all maritime States in the BlackSea, namely: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey and Ukraine.

The Port State Control Committee established under the Memorandum monitors and controls implementation andon-going operation of the Memorandum. The Committee consists of representatives of the maritime Authorities ofthe six member States and observers representatives from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), theInternational Labour Organization (ILO). The Committee granted observer status to the USCG, Paris MOU, MEDMOU, West and Central Africa MOU, Riyadh MOU, the State Maritime Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijanand Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution.

To coordinate daily activity of the organization, on the kind proposal by the Maritime Administration of Turkey, theMOU Authorities decided to establish Headquarter and the Secretariat in Istanbul.

The Russian Federation has developed and launched the Black Sea Information System (BSIS), PSC computerizedinformation system for the Black Sea MOU, basing on the technique used for the Asia Pacific ComputerizedInformation System (APCIS), PSC information system for the Tokyo MOU, which was also developed by the RussianFederation. The BSIS provides necessary tools to assist PSC Officers to conduct inspections. PSC Officers use acomprehensive database which contains data received from a variety of sources on a large number of vessels.This information includes the general particulars of a vessel, and its PSC inspection history.

To provide industry with the MOU news, procedures and inspection results the Black Sea MOU launched the internetweb-site at www.bsmou.org containing general information on MOU, regularly updated detention list. Taking intoaccount of successful operation of the BSIS, it was decided to start open publication of PSC inspection results ininternet through a direct link to the MOU database providing on-the-fly inspection results.

This annual report outlines recent activities on port State control in the Black Sea region, as well as internationalperspectives on port State control and includes the statistical port State inspection data conducted by the memberAuthorities of the BS MOU during the year 2017.

The Eighteenth Meeting of the Black Sea Port State Control Committee was held in İzmir, Turkey from 28 to 30 March2017. The meeting was chaired by Mrs. Natalia KHARCHENKO – Russian Federation.

The meeting was attended by the member Authorities: Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkeyand Ukraine. Representatives of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Riyadh MOU participated in the meeting asobservers. The Mediterranean MOU was represented by the delegation of Turkey.

Observers from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), USCG,Paris MOU, Abuja MOU and the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution were not able toattend.

Member Authorities presented information about their national arrangements for port State control activities, includingimportant organizational changes and availability of dedicated PSC structures.

The Committee adopted amendment to the Memorandum for the inclusion of the BWM Convention as a relevantinstrument effective on 8 September 2017.

The Committee considered outcome of the studies carried out by the Secretariat

- on the incorporation of the criteria for observer and associate membership in the Manual asa Guidance, with slight amendment to the MOU text;

- review of the Memorandum in the light of the new inspection regime and inspection scheme;and

- agreed to entrust the Secretariat to make amendment proposal to the Memorandum andrespective annexes with the support by the Russian Federation and Turkey.

Revisions to the Guidelines due to up-dates during 49th meeting the Paris MoU, and due to new inspection scheme,if any:

- Guidelines for PSCOs on Checking compliance with ECDIS- Guideline MARPOL Annex VI - STCW Manning and qualifications- Guidelines Maritime Labour Convention 2006 - Guideline ISM Code

Revision due to new inspection scheme e.g. incorporation of expanded inspection based upon review of theremaining respective Paris MOU PSCC Instructions:

- Guidelines on MARPOL Annex I


3

Port State Control Committee


4

- Guidelines for the PSCO on the ILLC- Rectification and Detention- Guidance for Checking the Structure of Bulk Carriers & Oil Tankers; and- Guidelines for PSCO on thickness measurements reports, including

The Committee considered follow-up inspection scheme in the light of new inspection scheme, there will be threetype of inspections: initial, detailed and expanded inspection and necessity to verify harmonization of the codingsystem with the Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU.

The Committee considered the report on the concentrated inspection campaign (CIC) on the Cargo Securingarrangements and future CICs and agreed to:

- approve report of the 2016 CIC on the Cargo Securing arrangement;- carry out CIC on on Safety of Navigation, incl. ECDIS in 2017 jointly with the Paris and Tokyo

MOUs; the arrangements for the subject CIC.

The Committee unanimously elected Mr. Tamay ÇETİN (Turkey) and Captain Dmytro PETRENKO (Ukraine) asChairman and Vice Chairman of the Committee.

The Committee agreed to conduct the BS MOU Port State Control Committee 19th meeting in Ukraine on April 2018.

Black Sea Information System (BSIS)

The Black Sea Information System has been established in the Russian Federation, for the purpose of exchanginginformation on port State inspections, in order to make available to Authorities information on inspection of shipsin other regional ports to assist them in their selection of foreign flag ships to be inspected and in the exercise ofport State control on selected ships; and provide effective information exchange facilities regarding port Statecontrol in the region.

As the further step for providing more transparent and timely information on the BS MOU PSC activities, theCommittee gave its approvals to on-line publication of the ship risk profile, PSC inspection and detention data onthe Memorandum web-site.

Concentrated Inspection Campaign

From 1st September 2017 to 30th November 2017, the BS MOU carried out a Concentrated Inspection Campaign(CIC) on Safety of Navigation including ECDIS. This campaign involved all member States of the BS MOU and wasconducted in conjunction with the Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, IO MOU and Vinã Del mar Agreement. The Paris MOUGuidelines and Questionnaire were utilized.

During the course of the campaign a total of 983 inspections of individual ships using the CIC questionnaire. Atotal of 59 ships were detained, in which 28.57% of them were CIC-topic related which means that in 21 cases theNavigation systems and equipment deficiencies, which were serious enough to detain the ship resulting a CIC-topic related detention rate of 2.14%.

A total of 245 non-compliances to the CIC topic requirements have been recorded as a direct result of thiscampaign. The overall average per cent of non-conformities was 2.68.

A total 180 questionnaires had at least one non-compliant response, which resulted 18.31% of CIC inspections notconforming with the requirements set out in questionnaire.


5

One PSCO from Turkey into the Expert Mission Training Course on PSC Muscat and Sohar, Oman 19 February to2 March 2017. One PSCO from Georgia into the Paris MOU Expert Training on Safety of Environment, the Haguethe Netherlands 28 February - 3 March 2017. One PSCO from (Georgia) 7th General Training Course for PSCOs,Yokohama, Japan, 14 August - 8 September 2017. One PSCO from Turkey into the Paris MOU Expert Training onSafety and Environment the Hague the Netherlands 20-23 March 2017.

PSCO Exchange Programme

Within the scope of the regional and interregional PSCO Exchange Programmes ten PSC officer exchanges wereconducted in 2017, two PSCOs from Georgia visited Romania and Turkey, one PSCO from the Russian Federationvisited Bulgaria and Turkey, and PSCOs from the Turkey visited the Russian Federation, Greece, Italy and PSCOsfrom Turkey will visit Germany and Spain.

Training

The BS MOU currently has 6 members, some with dual or even triple membership: Bulgaria, Romania and theRussian Federation with the Paris MOU, while the Russian Federation is also a member of the Tokyo MOU, withTurkey there is further tie with the MED MOU.

In order to further strengthen co-operation with IMO, an agreement for co-operation was concluded with IMO, asan Intergovernmental Organization, which allows the BS MOU (and other MOUs) to submit papers and attend IMOmeetings in its own rights. The BS MOU is represented by the at the IMO III sub-committee meetings and submittingits reports.

The BS MOU is accepted as an observer to several regional PSC agreements, that is, Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU,Mediterranean MoU, Viňa del Mar Agreement, and Indian Ocean MOU.

The BS MOU was represented by the Secretary at the Paris MOU PSCC50 meeting which was held in Gdansk,Poland, from 22 to 26 May 2017.

The BS MOU was represented by the Secretary in the 4th session of the Implementation of IMO Instruments (III)Sub-Committee (from 25 to 29 September 2017) which was held in IMO Headquarter.

The BS MOU was represented by the Russian Federation at the PSCC28 meeting of the Tokyo MOU which washeld in Vladivostok, Russian Federation from 18 to 21 September 2017.

The BS MOU represented by Turkey at the 31st meeting of the Paris MOU Technical Evaluation Group, which wereheld in the Hague, Netherlands from 5-8 December 2017.

Interregional Cooperation

Concentrated Inspection Campaign in 2018

The Committee agreed to participate into the CIC on MARPOL Annex VI during the period of 1st September to 30th

November 2018 and to request the Secretariat to report progress and developments on the 2018 CIC.

Detentions Rate 5.66% 5.75% 0.09%

RO Related Detainable Deficency 41 29 -12 (-29.3%)

Detainable Deficiency / Detention 3.59 3.40 -0.2 (-5.3%)

Deficiency Rate 3.61 4.11 0.5 (13.9%)

Detainable Deficiencies 822 962 140 (17.0%)

Deficiencies Total Deficiencies 18266 21006 2740 (15.0%)

Inspection Rate 69.80% 71.07% 1.3%

Individual Ships 3761 3707 -54 (-1.4%)

Inspections Total PSC Inspections 5066 5112 46 (0.9%)

Inspection with Deficiencies 2845 3018 173 (6.1%)

% Inspections with Deficiencies 56.16% 59.04% 2.9%

% of Total Inspections 4.52% 5.54% 1.02%

Total Detentions 229 283 54 (23.6%)

Detentions Individual Ships 213 258 45 (21%)

Table 1- Summary of 2017 Inspection and Trends as Compared with the Previous Year


6

PSC Inspections 2017Regional Inspection Data

During the 2017 calendar year 5,216 individual ships visited inspection ports in the Black Sea region in which 3,707(71.87%) individual ships inspected and 258 (6.96%) individual ships detained. The number of individual shipsinspected in 2017 (3,707) decreased 1.4 per cent compared with the number of individual ships inspected in 2016(3,761) despite to 3.2 per cent decrease of the individual ship visits in 2017 as compared with 5,388 individual shipvisits in 2016.

5,112 inspections carried out onboard 3,707 individual ships registered by 78 flag Administration. The number ofinspections in 2017 (5,112) increased compared with 2016 (5,066).

The overall detention percentage in the region was 4.52% in 2016; in 2017 it increased up to 5.54% as a per cent ofinspections, rather than the number of individual ships inspected to take into account that many ships are detainedmore than once during any one year. Regional detention rate (percentage of number of individual ships inspected)5.75% is which is higher than 5.66% in 2016.

The number of ships detained in 2017 for deficiencies clearly hazardous to safety, health or environmental amountedto 283. It compares with the number of detained 229 in 2016, 218 in 2015. Number of inspections increased 46 (0.9%),total number of detentions increased 23.6% which resulted 1.02 per cent increase in detention percentage in 2017.Table 1 displays summary of the 2017 inspection data and observed changes compared with the previous year.

2016 2017 Change Compare 2016

Ships Visits Individual Ships 5388 5216 -172 (-3.2%)

Inspection Data by Authority

The BS MOU member Authorities contributions into the regional inspection efforts displayed with Table 2. MemberAuthorities inspection rates (percent of number of individual ships inspected) varied between 22.1% and 70.6%.Figure 1 displays inspection and detention rates for 2017 by member Authorities and in the region. Detentionpercentage of the member Authorities are varied from 3.13 to 11.22 per cent. Per cent of inspections withdeficiencies varies from 36.69 per cent up to 79.13 per cent in the region. As a result of shipping activity the greatestnumber of PSC inspections were undertaken in the Russian Federation and Ukraine ports in 2017.

Georgia 577 270 283 207 1,791 23 23 46.79 8.52 8.13 73.14 6.33 5.54 5

Russia (1) 2,200 1,554 1,866 1,306 9,788 102 97 70.64 6.24 5.47 69.99 5.25 36.50 2

Ukraine 2,140 1,429 1,766 648 4,104 73 73 66.78 5.11 4.13 36.69 2.32 34.55 1


7

Table 2- Inspection Data by Authority and Region

Bulgaria 1,263 279 288 192 961 9 9 22.09 3.23 3.13 66.67 3.34 5.63 2

Romania 1,679 460 508 402 2,519 57 55 27.40 11.96 11.22 79.13 4.96 9.94 11

Turkey (1) 1,212 348 401 263 1,843 19 18 28.71 5.17 4.74 65.59 4.60 7.84 8

Regional 5,216 3,707 5,112 3,018 21,006 283 258 71.07 6.96 5.54 59.04 4.11 29

AUTHORITY NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L S

HIP

VIS

ITS

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

LS

HIP

S I

NS

PEC

TED

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

S W

ITH

RO

RELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F M

OU

TO

TAL

AV

ER

AG

E N

O. O

F D

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

PER

IN

SP

EC

TIO

N

% O

F IN

SP

EC

TIO

NS

WIT

HD

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E (4

)

DETE

NTI

ON

RA

TE (3

)

INS

PEC

TIO

N R

ATE

(2)

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

LS

HIP

S D

ETA

INED

NU

MB

ER

OF

DETE

NTI

ON

S

(1) Data only Black Sea Ports, (2) Individual ships inspected as per cent of individual ships visited(3) Individual ships detained as per cent of individual ships inspected, (4) Detentions as per cent of inspections.

Figure 2- Share of Inspections, Inspections with Deficiencies and Detentions of Members as Percentage of Regional Total

Figure 1- Inspection and Detention Rates by Authority and Region

In order to determine level of contributions of the meber Authorities into the regional inspections, share ofinspections, share of inspections with deficiencies and share of detentions presented in Figure 2.

Malta 620 12.24% 563 11.01% -57 -9.19 11.91%

Ukraine 340 19.3 1,192 67.5 234 13.3 0 0.0 1,766

HRS SRS LRS SRP UNKNOWN NUMBER OF

AUTHORITY NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER % INSPECTIONS

HRS SRS LRS SRP UNKNOWN

NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER % NUMBER %

SHIP RISK PROFILE (SRP) TOTAL

Turkey 427 8.43% 362 7.08% -65 -15.22 7.97%

Marshall Islands 442 8.72% 446 8.72% 4 0.90 8.28%

Liberia 383 7.56% 428 8.37% 45 11.75 8.05%

2016 2017 DIFFERENCE 2015-2017


8

Inspection Data by Flag

2017 Inspections were carried out on ships registered under 79 flags. The flag State with largest number of shipsinspected in the region was Panama with 758 (14.83%) inspection followed by Malta with 563 (11.01%) and MarshallIslands with 446 (8.72%) which constitute 1,767 (34.57%) of total inspections. Table 4 presents top 5 PSCinspections by flags in 2016 and in 2017.

In 2017, ships registered under 38 foreign flags were observed to have deficiencies sufficiently serious to impairthe seaworthiness and warrant detention. High detention percentage observed Comoros (16.67%), Sierra Leone(15.91%) followed by Togo (15.65%) and Ukraine (14.81%) flagged vessels. Table 5 illustrates inspections data byflags exceeding average detention percentage (with inspections more than 20).

Figure 3 presents ratio of the share of inspections to the share of detentions and deficiencies which indicatesrelative level of the detention and deficiencies. Malta, followed by Liberia, Marshall Island, Singapore and Turkeyperforming well concerning detentions. Marshall Islands, followed by Malta and Liberia performing well concerningdeficiencies.

Table 4- Top 5 Inspections by Flag of the Ships

FLAG NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER % SHARE

Panama 697 13.76% 758 14.83% 61 8.75 13.96%

Turkey 125 31.2 242 60.3 34 8.5 0 0.0 401

Romania 131 25.8 318 62.6 58 11.4 1 0.2 508

Russian Federation 283 15.2 1,339 71.8 242 13.0 2 0.1 1,866

Georgia 63 22.3 196 69.3 24 8.5 0 0.0 283

Table 3- Inspection Data by Ship Risk Profile

Bulgaria 58 20.1 193 67.0 31 10.8 6 2.1 288

REGION 1000 19.6 3,480 68.1 623 12.2 9 0.2 5,112

Breakdown of inspections by ship risk profile presented in Table 3. Majority of the inspected ships are standardrisk ship (SRP)s 3,480 (68.1%), followed by high ship risk ship (HRS)s 1000 (16.3%).

Togo 147 130 1207 23 67.0 15.65 10.11 13.21 8.69Ukraine 27 26 221 4 19.0 14.81 9.28 15.79 11.27

Tanzania, United Republic of 162 137 1319 20 74.0 12.35 6.81 14.81 10.29Sierra Leone 132 108 953 21 58.0 15.91 10.37 9.47 4.95

Russian Federation 224 154 944 13 68.7 5.80 0.27 4.71 0.19

Palau 72 56 483 8 37.0 11.11 5.58 9.43 4.91

Denmark 27 23 98 2 24.0 7.41 1.87 0.00 -4.52

Comoros 102 85 764 17 50.0 16.67 11.13 12.50 7.98

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 40 29 195 3 26.0 7.50 1.96 4.44 -0.08

Panama 758 471 3966 58 62.4 7.65 2.12 4.88 0.36

Moldova, Republic of 123 104 830 15 62.0 12.20 6.66 17.07 12.55

Cook Islands 134 93 611 16 79.0 11.94 6.40 6.35 1.83


9

Table 5- 2017 Detentions Per Flag, Exceeding Average Detention Percentage(Number of Inspections>20, with a Detention Percentage Exceeding 5.54%)

Belize 121 84 658 13 67.0 10.74 5.21 3.92 -0.60

FLAG NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

NO

. OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

EFIC

IEN

CIE

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

DETE

NTI

ON

S

% O

F IN

SP

ECTI

ON

S

WIT

H D

EFIC

IEN

CIE

S

DETE

NTI

ON

% 2

017

EXC

ESS

OF

AV

ERA

GE

2016

DETE

NTI

ON

% 2

016

EXC

ESS

OF

AV

ERA

GE

2017

Figure 3- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Deficiencies by the Flags(Inspections>30 Detentions>2)


10

Figure 4- Ratio of the Share of Inspections to the Share of RO Related Detentions and to the Share of RO Related DetainableDeficiencies (Inspections with RO Related Detentions)

Inspection Data by Recognized Organization

The majority of ships inspected are in class with the Nippon Kaiji Kyokai 1093 (15.4%), DNV GL AS 1072 (15.1%)Lloyd’s Register 872 (12.3%), Bureau Veritas 810 (11.4%) and followed by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping516 (7.3%)

Figure 4 presents ratio of the share of inspections to the share of RO related detentions and share of RO relateddetainable deficiencies. Guardian Bureau of Shipping (GBS) followed by Panama Shipping Registrar Inc.,Mediterranean Shipping Register (MSR), International Register of Shipping and National Shipping Adjuster Inc.have high share of RO related detentions and high share of RO related detainable deficiencies compare to theshare of inspections.

Chemical Tanker 347 6.85 352 6.89 5 1.44 7.02

Bulk Carrier 1737 34.29 1779 34.80 42 2.42 22.71

2016 2017 DIFFERENCE 2015-2017


11

Inspection Data by Ship Type

When considering the breakdown of ships inspected by ship type, largest group of the ship inspected during 2017were general cargo/multi purpose ships with 1,915 (37.46%) inspections; bulk carrier 1,779 (34.8%) and oil tanker644 (12.6%) were also inspected which represent 95.4 per cent of inspections. 2017 top 5 inspection by ship typepresented below.

Majority of detained ships were type of general cargo/multi purpose ships with 146 (63.8%) detentions, bulk carrierswith 53 (23.1%) detentions and Ro-Ro cargo ships with 7 (3.1%) detentions, followed by chemical tanker with 6(2.6%) detentions, which were accounted for 92.6 per cent of the total detentions.

Higher per cent of detentions were with Ro-Ro cargo ship (13.2%), tugboat (12.0%), livestock carrier (1.1%),followed by refrigerated cargo ships (18.3%) and general cargo/multi-purpose ships (7.6%) (number of inspectionsmore than 10).

Figure 5 shows how the ship types inspected performed with regards to detentions and deficiencies. Higher shareof detentions and deficiencies compared with share of inspections indicated that type of ship underperformingwith respect to detentions and deficiencies.

Container 157 3.10 145 2.84 -12 -7.64 2.99

SHIP TYPES NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER % SHARE

General Cargo/Multipurpose Ship 1910 37.70 1915 37.46 5 0.26 37.29

Oil Tanker 666 13.15 644 12.60 -22 -3.30 12.40

Figure 5- Share of Inspections to the Share of Detentions and Share of Deficiencies for Ship Types with Detentions

Fire Safety 99 12.0% 120 12.5% 21 0.4% 12.4%

Emergency Systems 110 13.4% 132 13.7% 22 0.3% 14.0%

2016 2017 DIFFERENCE 2015-2017


12

Number of ISM related detainable deficiencies were 535 which accounted for 2.55 per cent of the deficiencies,359 marine pollution MARPOL Annex I related deficiencies observed accounting 1.75 per cent of the totaldeficiencies.

A total 962 detainable deficiencies and 89 RO related detainable deficiencies were recorded during the port Statecontrol inspections. 4.7 per cent of total deficiencies in 2017 were detainable deficiencies, 9.2 per cent of detainabledeficiencies in 2017 were RO related.

Majority of the detainable deficiencies found upon inspections in 2017 were related to safety of navigation (14.0%),emergency systems (13.7%) lifesaving appliances (13.0%), followed by fire safety measures (12.5%), and ISM(7.6%). These five categories make up 60.8% of the total detainable deficiencies found in 2017. Top 5 category ofdetainable deficiencies presented below.

ISM 68 8.3% 73 7.6% 5 -0.7% 7.8%

DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE SHARE

Safety of Navigation 140 17.0% 135 14.0% -5 -3.0% 15.1%

Life Saving Appliances 105 12.8% 125 13.0% 20 0.2% 13.6%

Majority of the RO related detainable deficiencies found upon inspection in 2017 were related to structuralconditions (20.2%), life saving appliances (20.2%), fire safety (12.4%), followed by emergency systems (10.1%)and ship certificates (7.9%). These five categories make up 70.8% of the total RO related detainable deficienciesfound.

2017 Maritime Labour Convention Results

MLC, 2006 compliance is verified during 2,662 PSC inspections carried out in 2017 by Bulgaria, Romania (startedon 24 November 2017) and the Russian Federation and the results are presented in Table 6. This table identifiesthe number of MLC 2006-related deficiencies, detainable deficiencies and detentions by ship flag, ship type andship age.

PSCOs from Bulgaria, Romania and the Russian Federation identified 2,912 deficiencies related to MLC 2006issues. This represented 21.9 per cent of the total deficiencies issued and equated to 1.1 deficiency per inspection.

Of the 586 detainable deficiencies 56 were related to MLC detainable deficiencies. This represented 23.2 per centof the total detainable deficiencies. Of the 168 detentions 39 (23.2%) were due to the MLC, 2006 related detainabledeficiencies which resulted 1.46 detention percentage.

Health Protection/Medical Care/Social Security 1572 8.6% 1173 9.1% -399 0.5% 7.9%

Life Saving Appliances 2657 14.5% 1846 13.3% -811 -1.2% 14.1%

2016 2017 DIFFERENCE 2015-2017

Inspection Data by Deficiency

A total of 21,006 deficiencies were recorded during the port State control inspections in 2017. Majority of thedeficiencies found upon inspection in 2017 were related to safety of navigation (16.4%), life saving appliances(13.3%), fire safety measures (10.4%) and health protection, medical care, social security (9.1%). These fourcategories make up 49.2% of the total deficiencies found. Top 5 category of deficiencies presented below.

Structural Conditions 1173 6.4% 1171 7.2% -2 0.7% 6.7%

CATEGORY OF DEFICIENCIES NUMBER SHARE NUMBER SHARE NUMBER % SHARE

Safety of Navigation 3112 17.0% 2657 16.4% -455 -0.6% 16.9%

Fire Safety 1846 10.1% 1572 10.4% -274 0.3% 10.2%

TOTALS 2662 13268 2912 586 56 168 39

Other Types 783 2230 424 61 0 18 0

General Cargo / Multipurpose 818 6077 1390 398 46 104 30

Chemical Tanker 227 699 137 9 1 3 1

35 + 326 2714 642 221 26 50 17

25 - 29 136 976 219 84 9 18 6

16 - 20 312 1688 396 31 0 11 0

6 - 10 669 2125 447 36 0 17 0

TOTALS 2662 13268 2912 586 56 168 39


13

Table 6- 2017 MLC Results by Ship Flag, Ship Type and Ship Age

TOTALS 2662 13268 2912 586 56 168 39

Livestock Carrier 26 205 75 21 3 4 2

Gas Carrier 33 108 10 9 2 3 2

Bulk Carrier 775 3949 876 88 4 36 4

SHIP TYPE

Total

Detainable

Deficiencies

MLC

Deficiencies

Total

Deficiencies

Number of

Inspections

MLC

Detainable

Deficiencies

Total

Detentions

MLC

Detentions

30 - 34 186 1667 367 112 15 31 10

21 - 24 216 1549 330 62 4 22 4

11 - 15 510 1872 376 35 2 17 2

0 - 5 307 677 135 5 0 2 0

SHIP AGE

Total

Detainable

Deficiencies

MLC

Deficiencies

Total

Deficiencies

Number of

Inspections

MLC

Detainable

Deficiencies

Total

Detentions

MLC

Detentions

Moldova, Republic of 49 408 71 40 1 9 1

Cook Islands 59 380 93 28 1 8 1

Belize 49 359 90 25 2 5 1

Liberia 262 894 220 8 1 4 1

Comoros 40 370 82 48 11 11 6

Algeria 1 30 10 4 1 1 1

SHIP FLAG

Total

Detainable

Deficiencies

MLC

Deficiencies

Total

Deficiencies

Number of

Inspections

MLC

Detainable

Deficiencies

Total

Detentions

MLC

Detentions

Tanzania, United Republic of 82 687 179 20 2 8 2

Russian Federation 75 325 80 41 3 7 1

Palau 28 307 63 29 3 6 1

Sierra Leone 74 635 155 51 6 12 4

Panama 354 2551 564 131 6 37 6

Mongolia 10 83 5 8 1 2 1

Ukraine 16 126 35 22 6 4 3

Tunisia 2 38 9 4 1 1 1

Other Types 1252 4177 808 54 0 28 0

Turkey 208 1002 239 16 2 8 2

Togo 101 896 209 57 9 17 7

Iran, Islamic Republic of 12 3 14 0 10 0.00 25.00

Isle of Man (GB) 34 13 73 1 32 2.94 38.24

Ireland 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

India 9 6 27 0 8 0.00 66.67

Hong Kong, China 159 71 391 2 140 1.26 44.65

Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 10 8 69 2 8 20.00 80.00

Congo 3 3 26 1 2 33.33 100.00

Bulgaria 14 10 52 1 9 7.14 71.43

Bahamas 116 46 241 1 107 0.86 39.66

Croatia 7 3 19 0 7 0.00 42.86

Comoros 102 85 764 17 50 16.67 83.33

Chile 1 1 2 0 1 0.00 100.00

Canada 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Bermuda (GB) 4 3 17 0 3 0.00 75.00

Barbados 11 8 68 0 7 0.00 72.73

Azerbaijan 12 5 43 1 8 8.33 41.67

Antigua and Barbuda 75 49 333 4 66 5.33 65.33

Germany 1 1 13 0 1 0.00 100.00

France 3 2 10 0 3 0.00 66.67

Egypt 19 14 107 0 10 0.00 73.68

Cyprus 54 22 135 0 51 0.00 40.74

Italy 60 26 100 1 51 1.67 43.33

Greece 118 26 127 1 102 0.85 22.03

Korea, Republic of 1 1 3 0 1 0.00 100.00

Cook Islands 134 93 611 16 79 11.94 69.40

China 18 7 26 0 15 0.00 38.89

Cayman Islands (GB) 8 2 11 0 8 0.00 25.00

Cambodia 4 4 36 1 2 25.00 100.00

Belize 121 84 658 13 67 10.74 69.42

Bangladesh 2 1 3 0 1 0.00 50.00

Argentina 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Algeria 5 1 30 1 4 20.00 20.00

Georgia 1 1 6 0 1 0.00 100.00

Ethiopia 2 1 9 0 1 0.00 50.00

Denmark 27 23 98 2 24 7.41 85.19

Israel 4 3 14 0 4 0.00 75.00

Gibraltar (GB) 13 6 32 1 12 7.69 46.15

Kazakhstan 2 1 14 1 1 50.00 50.00


14

Port State Inspection Data for 2017

Table 7- Inspection Data by Flag

FLAG NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DETE

NTI

ON

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L

SH

IPS

INS

PEC

TED

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

Romania 1 1 7 0 1 0.00 100.00

Russian Federation 224 154 944 13 183 5.80 68.75

Panama 758 471 3966 58 535 7.65 62.14

Palau 72 56 483 8 37 11.11 77.78

Pakistan 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Portugal 32 19 95 0 28 0.00 59.38

Philippines 17 7 55 0 15 0.00 41.18

Poland 1 1 8 0 1 0.00 100.00

Mongolia 14 13 119 2 7 14.29 92.86

Montenegro 2 0 0 0 2 0.00 0.00

Liberia 428 208 1164 8 369 1.87 48.60

Lithuania 2 1 3 0 2 0.00 50.00

Marshall Islands 446 182 1081 9 387 2.02 40.81

Moldova, Republic of 123 104 830 15 62 12.20 84.55

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 8 3 13 0 5 0.00 37.50

Malta 563 280 1442 9 453 1.60 49.73

Micronesia, Federated States of 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Netherlands 70 26 148 2 62 2.86 37.14

Norway 30 15 97 0 25 0.00 50.00

Lebanon 7 5 25 0 5 0.00 71.43

Qatar 1 1 2 0 1 0.00 100.00

Sri Lanka 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Sierra Leone 132 108 953 21 58 15.91 81.82

Saudi Arabia 3 2 16 0 3 0.00 66.67

Saint Kitts and Nevis 32 27 145 0 20 0.00 84.38

Tuvalu 16 11 84 3 11 18.75 68.75

Tunisia 4 4 45 1 2 25.00 100.00

Thailand 3 1 8 0 3 0.00 33.33

Syrian Arab Republic 3 3 21 0 2 0.00 100.00

Ukraine 27 26 221 4 19 14.81 96.30

United Kingdom 19 11 59 1 16 5.26 57.89

United States 1 1 6 0 1 0.00 100.00

Switzerland 9 4 21 0 9 0.00 44.44

Singapore 140 67 426 3 129 2.14 47.86

Seychelles 2 2 13 0 2 0.00 100.00

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 40 29 195 3 26 7.50 72.50

Turkey 362 243 1380 11 208 3.04 67.13

Togo 147 130 1207 23 67 15.65 88.44

Tanzania, United Republic of 162 137 1319 20 74 12.35 84.57

Vanuatu 38 32 223 2 29 5.26 84.21

Kuwait 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00


15

FLAG NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DETE

NTI

ON

S

TOTAL 5112 3018 21006 283 3707 5.54 59.04

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L

SH

IPS

INS

PEC

TED

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

Table 7- Inspection Data by Flag (Continue)

Panama Maritime Documentation Services 13 9 136 0 2 0

Venezuelan Register of Shipping 78 64 584 1 16 1

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 139 115 918 7 15 2

RINA Services S.p.A. 276 143 833 0 12 0

Phoenix Register of Shipping 139 105 818 7 19 2

Panama Register Corporation 11 7 68 0 2 0

Turkish Lloyd 178 137 828 0 7 0

Macosnar Corporation 61 46 460 1 8 1

Lloyd's Register 872 423 2,458 1 16 1

Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A. 46 41 419 0 5 0

International Naval Surveys Bureau 184 146 1,366 3 26 3

Indian Register of Shipping 13 10 41 0 1 0

DNV GL AS 1,072 473 2,474 0 11 0

Columbus American Register 13 12 110 0 2 0

Bureau Veritas 810 410 2,595 1 21 1

American Register of Shipping 17 4 13 0 0 0

Overseas Marine Certification Services 16 14 135 0 1 0

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai 1,093 585 3,905 0 47 0

Mediterranean Shipping Register (MSR) 31 27 193 5 3 1

Maritime Bureau of Shipping 16 16 113 0 1 0


16

Korean Register of Shipping 88 40 266 0 3 0

International Register of Shipping 59 52 512 9 12 2

Intermaritime Certification Services, ICS Class 47 30 261 0 3 0

Dromon Bureau of Shipping 189 155 1,268 6 23 1

Table 8- Inspection Data by Recognized Organizations (Number of Inspections>10)

Cosmos Marine Bureau Inc. 13 13 136 0 4 0

China Classification Society 82 28 140 0 0 0

Bulgarian Register of Shipping 72 57 388 0 6 0

American Bureau of Shipping 515 217 1,065 1 6 1

RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Other 135 113 1,052 18 18 4

National Shipping Adjuster Inc. 66 52 571 4 12 1

Maritime Lloyd (ML) 89 83 735 3 11 2

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping 516 334 2,179 3 31 1

Polski Rejestr Statkow (Polish Register of Shipping) 57 34 303 2 7 2

Panama Shipping Registrar Inc. 16 14 165 4 2 1

Panama Marine Survey and Certification Services Inc. 11 8 84 0 3 0

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

S W

ITH

RO

RELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CEN

CIE

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

DETE

NTI

ON

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

RO

RELA

TED

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

Note: Number of inspections and detentions are calculated corresponding to each recognized organization (RO) that issuedcertificate(s) for a ship. In case that ship’s certificates were issued more than one ROs, the inspection and detention would becounted to each of them.

Commercial Yacht 1 1 3 0 1 0.00 100.00

Ro-Ro Cargo 86 76 779 12 37 13.95 88.37

Refrigerated Cargo 12 10 76 0 11 0.00 83.33

Other Special Activities 18 12 79 1 16 5.56 66.67

Offshore Supply 14 9 54 1 14 7.14 64.29

High Speed Passenger Craft 1 1 6 0 1 0.00 100.00

General Cargo / Multipurpose 1,915 1,420 11,013 179 1,161 9.35 74.15

Container 145 105 567 4 112 2.76 72.41

Chemical Tanker 352 182 894 8 290 2.27 51.70

Tugboat 19 12 45 2 15 10.53 63.16

Ro-Ro Passenger Ship 18 12 154 2 11 11.11 66.67


17

Passenger Ship 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.00

Oil Tanker 644 275 1,159 6 549 0.93 42.70

NLS Tanker 4 1 7 0 4 0.00 25.00

Livestock Carrier 38 36 303 5 23 13.16 94.74

Table 9- Inspection Data by Ship Type

Heavy Load 2 2 5 0 2 0.00 100.00

Gas Carrier 54 30 167 3 42 5.56 55.56

Combination Carrier 5 3 36 1 4 20.00 60.00

Bulk Carrier 1,779 829 5,654 59 1,426 3.32 46.60

TYPE OF SHIP NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Vehicle Carrier 2 1 4 0 2 0.00 50.00

ALL TYPES OF SHIPS 5,112 3,018 21,006 283 3,707 5.54 59.04

Special Purpose Ship 2 1 1 0 2 0.00 50.00

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F IN

SP

EC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

EFI

CIE

NC

IES

DETE

NTI

ON

PER

CEN

TAG

E

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H

DETE

NTI

ON

S

NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

NU

MB

ER

OF

IND

IVID

UA

L S

HIP

S

INS

PEC

TED

Anti Fouling 2 1 0 0.01 0.10 0,00

Ballast Water (BWM) 2 0 0 0.01 0.00 0,00


18

Life-saving Appliances 2,800 125 18 13.33 12.99 20,22

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 1,436 35 3 6.84 3.64 3,37

Safety of Navigation 3,446 135 7 16.40 14.03 7,87

Dangerous Goods 52 1 0 0.25 0.10 0,00

SOLAS Fire Safety 1,910 120 11 9.09 12.47 12,36

Alarms 70 9 3 0.33 0.94 3,37

Radio Communications 846 30 2 4.03 3.12 2,25

Cargo Operations Including Equipment 82 4 1 0.39 0.42 1,12

Emerceny Systems 1,145 132 9 5.45 13.72 10,11

Alarm Signals 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0,00

Structural Conditions 1,504 80 18 7.16 8.32 20,22

ISM 535 73 7 2.55 7.59 7.87

Living Conditions 181 2 0 0.86 0.21 0,00

MARPOL Annex I 359 15 1 1.71 1.56 1,12

Table 10- Inspection Data by Type of Deficiencies

Documents Ship Certificates 652 31 7 3.10 3.22 7,87

Certificates Crew Certificates 421 48 0 2.00 4.99 0,00

and Documents 1,292 9 0 6.15 0.94 0,00

CATEGORY OF DEFICIENCIES NO

. O

F R

O R

ELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Annex VI 22 0 0 0.10 0.00 0,00

Operational Deficiencies 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0,00

Prevention Annex IV 67 1 0 0.32 0.10 0,00

Annex V 279 0 0 1.33 0.00 0,00

Annex II 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0,00

Pollution Annex III 8 0 0 0.04 0.00 0,00

NO

. O

F D

ETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F TO

TAL

RO

RELA

TED

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F TO

TAL

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

NU

MB

ER

OF

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

% O

F TO

TAL

DETA

INA

BLE

DEFI

CIE

NC

IES

Accommodation, Recreational 381 9 0 1.81 0.94 0,00

Health Protection, Medical Care, Social Security 2,176 30 0 10.36 3.12 0,00

ILO/MLC Minimum Requirements for Seafarers 18 1 0 0.00 0.10 0.00

Conditions of Employment 22 5 0 0.00 0.52 0.00

Working Conditions 1,150 66 2 5.47 6.86 2.25

Other 147 0 0 0.70 0.00 0.00

TOTAL 21,006 962 89

RUSSIAN 70.27 69.38 69.99 6.47 6.14 5.47 6.88 7.00 6.24 68.55 78.84 70.64

FEDERATION (1)

UKRAINE 2680 1378 2140 1371 1553 1429 1664 1556 1766 599 555 648 8 10 73

UKRAINE 36.00 35.67 36.69 0.48 0.64 4.13 0.52 0.65 5.11 57.95 68.29 66.78

Detention Percentage 4.36 4.52 5.54

Number of Detentions 218 229 283

Number of Inspections with Deficiencies 2825 2845 3018

RUSSIAN 2035 1938 2200 1281 1395 1554 1638 1809 1866 1151 1255 1306 106 111 102

FEDERATION (1)

GEORGIA 783 674 577 353 320 270 339 474 283 202 218 207 16 14 23

GEORGIA 59.59 45.99 73.14 4.72 2.95 8.13 5.00 4.15 8.52 40.87 50.00 46.79

MARITIME % OF INSPECTIONS DETENTION DETENTION INSPECTION

AUTHORITY WITH DEFICIENCIES PERCENTAGE RATE (2) RATE (3)

MARITIME NO. OF INDIVIDUAL NO. OF INDIVIDUAL NUMBER OF NO. OF INSPECTIONS NUMBER OF

AUTHORITY SHIP VISIT SHIP INSPECTED INSPECTIONS WITH DEFICIENCIES DETENTIONS

2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017


19

Statistical Data 2015-2017

Summary

Inspection Data by Authority 2015-2017

Average Number of Deficiencies per Inspection 3.62 3.61 4.11

% of Inspections with Deficiencies 56.53 56.16 59.04

Number of Deficiencies Observed 18094 18266 21006

2015 2016 2017

Number of Inspections 4997 5066 5112

TURKEY (1) 1055 1041 1212 394 341 348 397 374 401 267 226 263 35 21 19

BULGARIA 1335 1346 1263 464 356 279 367 351 288 222 228 192 8 14 9

ROMANIA 1860 1780 1679 729 565 460 592 502 508 384 363 402 45 59 57

2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

TURKEY (1) 67.25 60.43 65.59 8.82 5.61 4.74 9.97 6.17 5.17 32.32 31.12 28.71

BULGARIA 60.49 64.96 66.67 2.18 3.99 3.13 2.25 4.09 3.23 26.67 25.41 22.09

ROMANIA 64.86 72.31 79.13 7.60 11.75 11.22 7.61 12.06 11.96 30.38 27.02 27.40

(1) Data only for the Black Sea Ports(2) Individual ships detained as per cent of individual ships inspected(3) Individual ships inspected as per cent of number of individual ships visited

Ro-Ro Passenger Ship 39 0.8% 13 0.3% 18 0.4% 0.5%

Livestock Carrier 45 0.9% 36 0.7% 38 0.8% 0.8%

Ro-Ro Cargo 94 1.9% 56 1.1% 54 1.1% 1.3%

Chemical Tanker 366 7.3% 347 6.9% 352 6.9% 7.0%

Bulk Carrier 1,709 34.2% 1,737 34.8% 1,779 35.1% 34.4%

Tugboat 22 0.4% 25 0.5% 19 0.4% 0.4%

Gas Carrier 77 1.5% 53 1.1% 86 1.7% 1.4%

Container 152 3.0% 157 3.1% 145 2.9% 3.0%

Oil Tanker 571 11.4% 666 13.3% 644 12.7% 12.4%

General Cargo / Multipurpose 1,834 36.7% 1,910 38.2% 1,915 37.8% 37.3%

Other Types of Ships 88 1.8% 66 1.3% 62 1.2% 1.4%

Singapore 131 2.6% 143 2.8% 140 2.7% 2.7%

Hong Kong, China 180 3.6% 157 3.1% 159 3.1% 3.3%

Russian Federation 257 5.1% 255 5.0% 224 4.4% 4.9%

Liberia 411 8.2% 383 7.6% 428 8.4% 8.1%

Malta 625 12.5% 620 12.2% 563 11.0% 11.9%

Others 1,757 35.2% 1,743 34.4% 1,723 33.7% 4.4%


20

TOTALS 4,997 5,066 5,112

2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2015-2017

SHIP TYPE SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Inspection by Ship Types (in the order of 2017 top 10 inspections)

Inspection by Ship Flag (in the order of 2017 top 10 inspections)

TOTALS 4,997 5,066 5,112

Togo 67 1.3% 106 2.1% 147 2.9% 2.1%

Tanzania, United Republic of 74 1.5% 81 1.6% 162 3.2% 2.1%

Turkey 420 8.4% 427 8.4% 362 7.1% 8.0%

Marshall Islands 369 7.4% 442 8.7% 446 8.7% 8.3%

2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2015-2017

SHIP FLAG SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Panama 664 13.3% 697 13.8% 758 14.8% 14.0%

Ro-Ro Passenger Ship 10 4.6% 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 1.6%

Livestock Carrier 8 3.7% 4 1.7% 5 1.8% 2.3%

Ro-Ro Cargo 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 3 1.1% 0.7%

Chemical Tanker 2 0.9% 6 2.6% 8 2.8% 2.2%

Bulk Carrier 51 23.4% 53 23.1% 59 20.8% 22.3%

Other 43 19.7% 23 10.0% 13 4.6% 10.8%

Ukraine 7 3.2% 3 1.3% 4 1.4% 1.9%

Turkey 32 14.7% 39 17.0% 11 3.9% 11.2%

Tanzania, United Republic of 12 5.5% 12 5.2% 20 7.1% 6.0%

Sierra Leone 6 2.8% 9 3.9% 21 7.4% 4.9%

Russian Federation 22 10.1% 12 5.2% 13 4.6% 6.4%

Palau 9 4.1% 5 2.2% 8 2.8% 3.0%

Mongolia 3 1.4% 2 0.9% 2 0.7% 1.0%

Marshall Islands 4 1.8% 7 3.1% 9 3.2% 2.7%

Liberia 4 1.8% 7 3.1% 8 2.8% 2.6%

Denmark 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 0.3%

Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 2 0.7% 0.5%

Belize 4 1.8% 4 1.7% 13 4.6% 2.9%


21

Vanuatu 1 0.5% 2 0.9% 2 0.7% 0.7%

Tuvalu 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 3 1.1% 0.7%

Togo 9 4.1% 14 6.1% 23 8.1% 6.3%

Singapore 3 1.4% 1 0.4% 3 1.1% 1.0%

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 6 2.8% 2 0.9% 3 1.1% 1.5%

Panama 22 10.1% 34 14.8% 58 20.5% 15.6%

Netherlands 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 0.3%

Moldova, Republic of 18 8.3% 21 9.2% 15 5.3% 7.4%

TOTALS 218 229 283

Tugboat 1 0.5% 3 1.3% 2 0.7% 0.8%

Other Types of Ship 14 6.4% 2 0.9% 3 1.1% 2.6%

Gas Carrier 12 5.5% 7 3.1% 12 4.2% 4.2%

Container 2 0.9% 2 0.9% 4 1.4% 1.1%

Oil Tanker 6 2.8% 5 2.2% 6 2.1% 2.3%

2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2015-2017

SHIP TYPE SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

General Cargo / Multipurpose 119 54.6% 146 63.8% 179 63.3% 60.8%

Detentions by Ship Types (in the order of 2017 top 10 inspections)

Detentions by Ship Flag (more than 1 detentions in 2017)

TOTALS 218 229 283

Malta 7 3.2% 7 3.1% 9 3.2% 3.2%

Hong Kong, China 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.7% 0.3%

Cook Islands 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 16 5.7% 2.5%

Comoros 3 1.4% 10 4.4% 17 6.0% 4.1%

2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2015-2017

SHIP FLAG SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Antigua and Barbuda 1 0.5% 3 1.3% 4 1.4% 1.1%

Ballast Water (BWM) 2 0.01

Life-saving Appliances 2,604 14.39 2,657 14.55 2,800 13.33

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 984 5.44 1,093 5.98 1,436 6.84

Safety of Navigation 3,161 17.47 3,112 17.04 3,446 16.40

Dangerous Goods 60 0.33 42 0.23 52 0.25

SOLAS Fire Safety 1,811 10.01 1,846 10.11 1,910 9.09

Alarms 43 0.24 72 0.39 70 0.33

Radio Communications 868 4.80 855 4.68 846 4.03

Cargo Operations Including Equipment 65 0.36 141 0.77 82 0.39

Emerceny Systems 933 5.16 960 5.26 1,145 5.45

Alarm Signals 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Structural Conditions 1,161 6.42 1,173 6.42 1,504 7.16


22

ISM 584 3.23 443 2.43 535 2,55

Living Conditions 395 2.18 261 1.43 181 0.86

Anti Fouling 0 0.00 1 0.01 2 0.01

MARPOL Annex I 251 1.39 293 1.60 359 1.71

Documents Ship Certificates 727 4.02 579 3.17 652 3.10

CATEGORY OF DEFICIENCIES

Certificates Crew Certificates 240 1.33 202 1.11 421 2.00

and Documents 1,157 6.39 1,171 6.41 1,292 6.15

Annex VI 18 0.10 19 0.10 22 0.10

Operational Deficiencies 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Prevention Annex IV 73 0.40 52 0.28 67 0.32

Annex V 200 1.11 178 0.97 279 1.33

Annex II 3 0.02 11 0.06 1 0.00

Pollution Annex III 6 0.03 6 0.03 8 0.04

Number

2015 2016 2017

Number Number% %%

Accommodation, Recreational 102 0.56 198 1.08 381 1.81

Health Protection, Medical Care, Social Security 1,062 5.87 1,572 8.61 2,176 10.36

ILO/MLC Minimum Requirements for Seafarers 4 0.02 6 0.03 18 0.08

Conditions of Employment 26 0.14 30 0.16 22 0.10

Working Conditions 1,445 7.99 1,132 6.20 1,150 5.47

Other 111 0.61 161 0.88 147 0.70

TOTAL 18,094 18,266 21,006

Major Category of Deficiencies 2015-2017

Health Protection, Medical Care, 1,062 5.9% 1,572 8.6% 1,910 9.09% 7.9%

Social Security

Fire Safety 1,811 10.0% 1,846 10.1% 2,176 10.36% 10.2%

Others 2,908 16.1% 2,695 14.8% 3,301 15.71% 15.5%

Radio Communications 868 4.8% 855 4.7% 846 4.03% 4.5%

Working Conditions 1,445 8.0% 1,132 6.2% 1,150 5.47% 6.5%

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 984 5.4% 1,093 6.0% 1,436 6.84% 6.1%

Certificate & Documentation/Documents 1,157 6.4% 1,171 6.4% 1,292 6.15% 6.3%

Life Saving Appliances 2,604 14.4% 2,657 14.5% 2,800 13.33% 14.1%

Emergency Systems 933 5.2% 960 5.3% 1,145 5.45% 5.3%

Structural Conditions 1,161 6.4% 1,173 6.4% 1,504 7.16% 6.7%

Safety of Navigation 3,161 17.5% 3,112 17.0% 3,446 16.40% 16.9%

TOTALS 18,094 18,266 21,006

Emergency, Lighting Batteries Lifebuoys Incl. Provision and Emergency, Lighting, Batteriesand Switches 461 (2.55%) Disposition 470 (2.57%) and Switches 494 (2.35%)

Nautical Publication 607 (3.35%) Lights, Shapes, Sound-Signals Lights, Shapes, Sound-Signals600 (3.28%) 681 (3.34%)

Lifebuoys Incl. Provision and Emergency, Lighting, Batteries Access / Structural Features (Ship)Disposition 453 (2.50%) and Switches 450 (2.46%) 473 (2.25%)

Lights Shapes Sound-Signals 564 (3.12%) Nautical Publications 579 (3.17%) Nautical Publications 580 (2.76%)

Lifeboat 678 (3.75%) Lifeboats 627 (3.43%) Lifeboats 689 (3.28%)

2015 2016 2017


23

2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2015-2017

DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORY SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Major Deficiencies by Category (in the order 2017 top 10)

Top 5 Deficiencies 2015-2017

All Other Deficiencies 10 33.3% 10 21.3% 3 7.3% 19.5%

TOTALS 30 47 41


Emergency Systems 109 14.9% 110 13.4% 132 13.7% 14.0%

Fire Safety 2 6.7% 3 6.4% 10 24.4% 12.7%

Emerceny Systems 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 2 4.9% 2.5%

ISM 4 13.3% 4 8.5% 5 12.2% 11.0%

Certificate & Documentation/Ship Certificates 46 6.3% 37 4.5% 31 3.2% 4.5%

Crew Certificates 16 2.2% 32 3.9% 48 5.0% 3.8%

Structural Conditions 58 7.9% 67 8.2% 80 8.3% 8.1%

Fire Safety 92 12.6% 99 12.0% 120 12.5% 12.4%

Emergency, Lighting, Batteries Charts 32 (3.89%) Emergency, Lighting, Batteriesand Switches 28 (3.81%) and Switches 34 (3.53%)

Charts 30 (4.09%) Other (ISM) 41 (4.99%) Lifeboats 44 (4.57%)


24

Safety of Navigation 4 13.3% 2 4.3% 2 4.9% 6.8%

Ship Certificates 1 3.3% 8 17.0% 2 4.9% 9.3%

RO RELATED DETAINABLE 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2015-2017

DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORY SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Structural Conditions 4 13.3% 13 27.7% 8 19.5% 21.2%

Major RO Related Detainable Deficiencies by Category 2015-2017 (in the order 2017 top 5)

Emergency Fire Pump and Emergency Fire Pump and Lights, Shapes andIts Pipes 25 (3.41%) Its Pipes 29 (3.53%) Sound-Signals 32 (3.3%)

Other (ISM) 29 (3.95%) Lifeboats 34 (4.14%) Cleanliness of Engine Room35 (3.64%)

Lifeboats 46 (6.27%) Nautical Publications 46 (5.60%) Other (ISM) 50 (5.20%)

2015 2016 2017

TOTALS 732 822 962

Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery 20 2.7% 31 3.8% 35 3.6% 3.4%

Others 101 13.8% 114 13.9% 117 12.2% 13.2%

Working Conditions 18 2.5% 19 2.3% 66 6.9% 4.1%

ISM 54 7.4% 68 8.3% 73 7.6% 7.8%


DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2015-2017

BY CATEGORY SHARE SHARE SHARE SHARE

Safety of Navigation 105 14.3% 140 17.0% 135 14.0% 15.1%

Major Detainable Deficiencies by Category 2015-2017 (in the order 2017 top 10)

Top 5 Detainable Deficiencies 2015-2017

Pumping Piping and Discharge Doors 3 (7.32%) Lifeboats 4 (8.16%)Arrangements 3 (6.38%)

Ventilators Air Pipes Casings Lifeboats 4 (9.76%) Covers (Hatchway-, Portable-,3 (6.38%) Tarpaulins, etc.) 4 (8.16%)


25

Safety Management Certificate Ventilators, Air Pipes, Casings Rescue Boats 4 (8.16%)(SMC/ISM Code) 2 (4.26%) 3 (7.32%)

Rescue Boats 3 (3.68%) Documentation-ISM 4 (9.76%) Emergency, Lighting, Batteriesand Switches 4 (8.16%)

Ballast. Fuel and Other Tanks Fire Doors / Openings in Other (ISM) 6 (12.24%)3 (6.38%) Fire-Resisting Divisions 4 (9.76%)

2015 2016 2017

RO Related Detainable Deficiencies 2015-2017

Top 5 MLC Deficiencies 2015-2017

Top 5 MLC Detainable Deficiencies 2015-2017

Anchoring Devices 80 (6.3%) Records of Rest 141 (6.94%) Electrical 212 (7.28%)

Ropes and Wires 238 (18.7%) Access / Structural Features (Ship) Lighting (Working Spaces)334 (16.43%) 432 (14.84%)

Electrical 78 (6.2%) Electrical 130 (6.39%) Steam Pipes, Pressure Pipes,Wires (Insulation) 133 (4.57%)

Lighting (Working Spaces) 200 (15.7%) Ropes and Wires 275 (13.53%) Ropes and Wires 283 (9.72%)

Access / Structural Features (Ship) Lighting (Working Spaces) Access / Structural Features284 (22.3%) 358 (17.61%) (Ship) 473 (16.24%)

2015 2016 2017

Maritime Labour Certificate 2 (5.9%) Wages 3 (7.14%) Anchoring Devices 5 (8.93%)

Calculation and Payment of Cleanliness of Engine Room Ropes and Wires 4 (7.14%)Wages 2 (5.9%) 3 (7.14%)Heating, Air Conditioning and Access / Structural Features Ventilation 2 (5.9%) (Ship) 3 (7.14%)Electrical 2 (5.9%) Cleanliness ofEngine Room 2 (5.9%)

Ropes and Wires 5 (14.1%) Manning Specified by the Minimum Cleanliness of Engine RoomSafe Manning Doc 5 (11.90%) 6 (10.71%)

Legal Documentation on Work and Anchoring Devices 3 (7.14%) Wages 5 (8.93%)Rest Hours 2 (5.9%)

Seafarers' Employment Agreement Seafarers' Employment Agreement Winches & Capstans 5 (8.93%)4 (11.8%) (SEA) 4 (9.52%)

Wages 5 (14.7%) Ropes and Wires 6 (14.29%) Ropes and Wires 6 (10.71%)

2015 2016 2017

SHIP FLAGNUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS

WITH DEFICIENCIES


26

Inspection Detention Deficiency Data by Ship Flag 2015-2017

Algeria

Antigua and Barbuda

Argentina

Azerbaijan

Bahamas

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Belgium

Belize

Bermuda (GB)

Bolivia

Bulgaria

Cambodia

Canada

Cayman Islands (GB)

Chile

China

Comoros

Congo

Congo, the Democratic Republic of the

Cook Islands

Croatia

Curacao

Cyprus

Denmark

Egypt

Ethiopia

Faroe Islands

Finland

France

Georgia

Germany

Gibraltar (GB)

Greece

Honduras

Hong Kong, China

India

Iran, Islamic Republic of

Ireland

Isle of Man (GB)

Israel

Italy

Japan

Kazakhstan

Korea, Republic of

Kuwait

Latvia

7

278

1

24

342

1

8

30

11

345

7

6

41

183

1

30

1

61

225

32

37

363

21

5

180

74

51

8

2

1

6

6

3

54

407

1

496

20

31

2

84

7

214

5

3

11

3

1

35

929

0

83

784

4

39

132

13

1,826

23

66

194

1,281

0

71

2

81

1,632

272

261

1,685

34

45

387

255

315

33

2

0

14

25

27

109

491

27

908

48

143

0

187

31

333

0

19

19

2

3

1

8

0

1

5

0

0

0

0

21

0

0

4

20

0

0

0

1

30

4

4

26

0

0

4

2

2

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

3

1

4

0

2

0

3

0

2

0

1

0

0

0

3

157

0

9

139

1

5

21

4

265

5

5

30

161

0

11

1

16

185

27

29

272

5

5

69

54

40

5

1

0

3

5

3

26

99

1

171

11

12

0

32

4

84

0

2

3

1

1

4

14

0

4

12

0

0

0

0

75

0

0

9

85

0

0

0

2

117

13

19

84

0

0

7

3

3

0

0

0

0

5

0

2

4

13

6

0

8

0

4

0

4

0

3

0

0

0


27

SHIP FLAGLebanon

Liberia

Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Malta

Marshall Islands

Micronesia, Federated States of

Moldova, Republic of

Mongolia

Montenegro

Netherlands

Norway

Pakistan

Palau

Panama

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Qatar

Romania

Russian Federation

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Samoa

Saudi Arabia

Seychelles

Sierra Leone

Singapore

South Africa

Spain

Sri Lanka

Switzerland

Syrian Arab Republic

Tanzania, United Republic of

Thailand

Togo

Tunisia

Turkey

Tuvalu

Ukraine

United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom

United States

Vanuatu

Vietnam

TOTAL

Inspection Detention Deficiency Data by Ship Flag 2015-2017 (Continue)

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS

WITH DEFICIENCIES

33

1,222

23

9

4

3

1,808

1,257

6

387

38

9

197

87

3

172

2,119

47

1

63

3

2

736

135

147

1

4

2

301

414

1

1

3

31

8

317

20

320

9

1,209

41

83

1

62

5

99

2

15,175

193

3,107

32

10

7

0

4,157

2,715

22

2,927

296

8

384

195

2

1,258

9,097

142

8

203

2

8

2,814

635

757

23

16

13

2,077

1,046

0

0

15

71

41

2,843

49

2,678

64

5,004

211

618

0

187

9

517

34

57,365

3

19

0

0

0

0

23

20

1

54

7

0

2

1

0

22

114

2

0

1

0

0

47

9

11

0

0

0

36

7

0

0

0

1

0

44

0

46

1

82

5

14

0

1

0

5

1

730

26

554

7

3

2

0

839

517

5

342

32

2

76

33

1

138

1,286

26

1

39

1

2

484

101

104

1

2

2

255

192

0

0

2

13

5

287

9

288

7

800

29

74

0

33

2

80

2

8,687

9

34

0

0

0

0

50

32

4

269

38

0

3

2

0

106

384

5

0

2

0

0

159

25

33

0

0

0

144

14

0

0

0

4

0

222

0

194

4

188

11

67

0

1

0

12

2

2,518

RECOGNIZED

ORGANIZATION

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

WITH

DEFICIENCIES


28

RO Inspection Deficiency and Detention Data 2015-2017

American Bureau of Shipping

American Register of Shipping

ASIA Classification Society

Bulgarian Register of Shipping

Bureau Veritas

Caspian Register of Shipping

China Classification Society

Columbus American Register

Cosmos Marine Bureau Inc.

CR Classification Society (CCRS)

Croatian Register of Shipping

Cyprus Bureau of Shipping

Det Norske Veritas

DNV GL AS

Dromon Bureau of Shipping

Ferriby Marine

Germanischer Lloyd

Global Marine Bureau Inc.

Global Shipping Bureau Inc

Global Shipping Class Inc.

Guardian Bureau of Shipping (GBS)

Hellenic Register of Shipping

Honduras Maritime Inspection Inc.

Indian Register of Shipping

Inspeccion y Clasificacion Maritima

(INCLAMAR)

Intermaritime Certification Services,

ICS Class

International Maritime Register

International Naval Surveys Bureau

International Register of Shipping

International Ship Classification

Iranian Classification Society

Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A.

Korea Classification Society

Korean Register of Shipping

Libyan Surveyor Mr. Sif Ennasar

Abdulhamid Giahmi

1,592

39

10

231

2,586

2

289

38

20

3

30

2

499

2,772

482

11

429

51

7

1

20

12

2

23

6

107

13

417

243

23

9

108

6

251

2

1

0

0

3

2

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

14

0

0

0

0

0

13

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

26

0

0

7

0

0

0

1

0

0

3

2

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

4

0

0

1

0

0

0

3,028

75

79

1,467

7,473

8

382

367

212

15

86

6

768

5,911

3,206

37

1,091

376

45

7

213

49

27

60

69

668

101

2,933

1,815

141

3

799

12

725

10

21

2

1

23

72

0

2

6

6

0

1

0

3

29

49

0

10

5

1

1

4

0

1

1

1

10

2

45

33

4

0

10

0

10

0

45

12

2

118

148

0

3

37

28

0

1

0

9

56

192

0

24

25

2

2

32

0

13

4

1

35

8

156

149

9

0

27

0

23

0

625

15

8

190

1,285

1

75

37

18

3

11

2

167

1,177

416

5

209

46

7

1

18

8

1

14

5

77

12

350

208

18

1

93

3

120

2


29

RO Inspection Deficiency and Detention Data 2015-2017 (Continue)

Note: Number of inspections and detentions are calculated corresponding to each recognized organization (RO) that issuedcertificate(s) for a ship. In case that ship’s certificates were issued more than one ROs, the inspection and detention would becounted to each of them.

RECOGNIZED

ORGANIZATION

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

RO RELATED

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

DETENTIONS

NUMBER OF

DETAINABLE

DEFICIENCIES

NUMBER OF

INSPECTIONS

WITH

DEFICIENCIES

2,560

146

44

218

58

1

159

5

3,229

6

302

52

4

36

35

2

48

40

290

133

762

1,777

2

6

460

587

3

4

180

3

22,279

1

5

0

13

9

0

4

0

5

0

22

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

11

2

0

9

0

0

13

0

0

0

4

0

174

1

2

0

4

2

0

1

0

3

0

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

3

2

0

4

0

0

5

0

0

0

2

0

58

6,267

1,021

370

1,923

364

0

1,103

8

10,533

18

2,434

395

14

219

275

4

219

307

1,687

754

2,012

6,699

6

45

2,910

2,755

28

22

1,711

40

77,905

38

16

5

32

7

0

17

0

125

0

34

5

1

3

5

0

4

5

28

10

21

79

0

1

48

49

1

1

36

1

932

80

72

21

140

27

0

54

0

308

0

141

21

2

11

18

0

15

25

91

27

48

250

0

1

222

125

5

3

166

2

3,048

1,137

121

43

207

49

0

124

2

1,701

3

259

41

2

30

25

2

31

37

227

95

371

1,111

1

4

376

433

3

3

162

3

12,161

Lloyd's Register

Macosnar Corporation

Maritime Bureau of Shipping

Maritime Lloyd (ML)

Mediterranean Shipping Register (MSR)

National Cargo Bureau Inc.

National Shipping Adjuster Inc.

New United International Marine

Services Ltd.

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai

No class

Other

Overseas Marine Certification Services

Panama Bureau of Shipping

Panama Marine Survey and

Certification Services Inc.

Panama Maritime Documentation

Services

Panama Maritime Surveyor Bureau Inc.

Panama Register Corporation

Panama Shipping Registrar Inc.

Phoenix Register of Shipping

Polski Rejestr Statkow

(Polish Register of Shipping)

RINA Services S.p.A.

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping

Russian River Register

Ship Classification Of Malaysia

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU)

Turkish Lloyd

Universal Maritime Bureau Ltd

Universal Shipping Bureau Inc.

Venezuelan Register of Shipping

Vietnam Register

TOTAL

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) Ukraine 82 2 2.44 0.75

Maritime Lloyd (ML) Tanzania, United Republic of 132 3 2.27 0.58

Venezuelan Register of Shipping Tanzania, United Republic of 65 2 3.08 1.38

International Register of Shipping Palau 81 2 2.47 0.78

International Naval Surveys Bureau 49 1 2.04 0.35

Dromon Bureau of Shipping 126 1 0.79 -0.90

Ukraine Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 82 2 2.44 0.75

Tanzania, Maritime Lloyd (ML) 132 3 2.27 0.58

Sierra Leone Dromon Bureau of Shipping 256 3 1.17 -0.52

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 114 1 0.88 -0.81

Moldova, Republic of Bulgarian Register of Shipping 65 2 3.08 1.38

International Register of Shipping Moldova, Republic of 39 1 2.56 0.76

Bulgarian Register of Shipping Comoros 88 2 2.27 0.58


30

TOTAL 1,241 21 1.69

Togo International Naval Surveys Bureau 122 1 0.82 -0.87

Palau International Register of Shipping 81 2 2.47 0.78

Comoros Bulgarian Register of Shipping 31 1 3.23 1.53

Cambodia International Register of Shipping 25 1 4.00 2.31

Shipping Register of Ukraine (SRU) 93 1 1.08 -0.62

FLAG STATE RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

(+/-

) EX

CES

SA

VER

AG

E 1

.69%

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

ETE

NTI

ON

S

DETE

NTI

ON

%

Bulgarian Register of Shipping Moldova, Republic of 65 2 3.08 1.38

International Register of Shipping Cambodia 25 1 4.00 2.31

RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION FLAG STATE NU

MB

ER

OF

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

(+/-

) EX

CES

SA

VER

AG

E 1

.69%

INS

PEC

TIO

NS

WIT

H D

ETE

NTI

ON

S

DETE

NTI

ON

%

Flag Administrations with Very High Detention Index Level with Corresponding ROswith an Average Detention Percentage ≥ 1.69% 2015-2017

United Republic of Venezuelan Register of Shipping 65 2 3.08 1.38

Flag Administrations with Very High Detention Index Level1 with Corresponding ROwith an Excess Factor ≥ 0.5% Detention 2015-2017

1 Detention Index Greater Than 2 Times of the Regional Average Detention Index

BulgariaBulgarian Maritime Administration

Ministry of Transport and Communication9, Dyakon Ignatiy St., 1000 Sofia / Bulgaria

Tel: +359 2 930 0910 • Fax: +359 2 930 0920e-mail: [email protected]

GeorgiaMaritime Transport Agency

Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia50 Bako Street, Batumi 6000 Georgia

Tel: +995 222 74925 • Fax: +995 222 73929e-mail: [email protected]

RomaniaRomanian Naval Authority

Constanta Port No.1 Gate 1-8700 Constanta / RomaniaTel: +40 241 61 6124 • Fax: +40 241 61 6229

e-mail: [email protected]

Russian FederationDepartment of the State Policy for Maritime and River Transport, Ministry of Transport

1, bldg 1, Rozhdestvenska st., Moscow 109012 RussiaTel: +7 499 495 0000 • Fax: +7 499 495 0010


TurkeyRepublic of Turkey

Directorate General for Regulation of Maritime and Inland Waters Ministry of Transport,Maritime Affairs and Communications

Hakkı Turayliç Cad. No: 5 Emek 06338 Ankara / TurkeyTel: + 90 312 203 10 00, +90 312 203 22 20 • Fax: +90 312 231 33 06

e-mail: [email protected] - [email protected]

UkraineState Service of Ukraine for Transport Safety

14 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 01135, UkraineTel: +380 44 351 44 01 • Fax: +380 44 351 47 62


www.etkilesimltd.com