22
Supporting Information for Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Z52253 © Wiley-VCH 2003 69451 Weinheim, Germany

Polymorphism TNB Text&Suppl - Wiley-VCH · 2004. 2. 18. · Crystal data and structure refinement for TNB Form I . Identification code TNB Form I Empirical formula C6 H3 N3 O6 Formula

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Supporting Information

    for

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Z52253

    © Wiley-VCH 200369451 Weinheim, Germany

  • Polymorphism of 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene induced by trisindane additive**

    Praveen K. Thallapally, Ram K. R. Jetti, Amy K. Katz, H. L. Carrell, Kuldeep Singh,

    Kakali Lahiri, Sambasivarao Kotha, Roland Boese,* Gautam R. Desiraju*

    [*] Prof. G. R. Desiraju, Dr. P. K. Thallapally

    School of Chemistry, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500 046, India

    Fax: (+91) 40-2301-0567

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Prof. Dr. R. Boese, Dr. R. K. R. Jetti

    Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Essen,

    Universitätstrasse 5-7, D-45177 Essen, Germany

    Fax: (+49) 201-183-2535

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Dr. H. L. Carrell, A. K. Katz

    The Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Avenue,

    Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA

    Prof. S. Kotha, K. Singh, Dr. K. Lahiri

    Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai, 400 076,

    India

  • 1

    Form I

    Form II

    Form III

    TI

  • 2

    Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for TNB Form I .

    Identification code TNB Form I

    Empirical formula C6 H3 N3 O6

    Formula weight 213.11 Da

    Density (calculated) 1.729 g cm-3

    F(000) 1728

    Temperature 183(2) K

    Crystal size 0.43 x 0.21 x 0.07 mm

    Crystal color colorless

    Crystal description plate

    Wavelength 0.71073 Å

    Crystal system orthorhombic

    Space group Pbca

    Unit cell dimensions a = 12.587(11) Å α = 90°

    b = 9.684(9) Å β = 90°

    c = 26.86(2) Å γ = 90°

    Volume 3274(5) Å3

    Z 16

    Cell measurement reflections used 1658

    Cell measurement theta min/max 2.76° to 18.16°

    Diffractometer control software Bruker AXS SMART Vers. 5.054 1997/98

    Diffractometer measurement device Siemens SMART CCD area detector system

    Diffractometer measurement method Full sphere data collection

    in omega at 0.3° scan width

    two runs with 720 frames, phi = 0°, 270°

    and two runs with 436 frames, phi = 88°, 180°

    Theta range for data collection 2.22° to 28.75°

    Completeness to theta = 28.75° 98.5 %

    Index ranges -16

  • 3

    Computing structure refinement Bruker AXS SHELXTL Vers.6.10, DOS/WIN95/NT/2000

    Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2

    Reflections collected 36564

    Independent reflections 4188 [R(int) = 0.1760]

    Data / restraints / parameters 1396 / 0 / 271

    Goodness-of-fit on F2 0.831

    Weighting details w = 1/[σ2 (Fo2)+ (0.0635*P)2]

    where P = (Fo2+2Fc2)/3

    Final R indices [I>2sigma(I)] R1 = 0.0450, wR2 = 0.0985

    R indices (all data) R1 = 0.1883, wR2 = 0.1422

    Largest diff. peak and hole 0.188 and -0.191 eÅ-3

    Treatment of hydrogen atoms Riding model on idealized geometries

    with the 1.2 fold isotropic displacement

    parameters of the equivalent Uij of the

    corresponding carbon atom

  • 4

    Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for TNB Form II

    Identification code Form II

    Empirical formula C6 H3 N3 O6

    Formula weight 213.11

    Temperature 120(2) K

    Wavelength 0.71073 Å

    Crystal system Orthorhombic

    Space group Pca21

    Unit cell dimensions a = 9.2970(19) Å, α = 90°

    b = 18.730(4) Å, β = 90°

    c = 9.6330(19) Å, γ = 90°

    Volume 1677.4(6) A3

    Z, Calculated density 8, 1.688 Mg/m3

    Absorption coefficient 0.155 mm-1

    F(000) 864

    Crystal size 0.3 x 0.3 x 0.1 mm

    Theta range for data collection 2.45 to 27.88°

    Limiting indices 0

  • 5

    Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for TNB Form III .

    Identification code TNB Form III

    Empirical formula C6 H3 N3 O6

    Formula weight 213.11 Da

    Density (calculated) 1.717 g cm-3

    F(000) 432

    Temperature 183(2) K

    Crystal size 0.57 x 0.35 x 0.15 mm

    Crystal color yellow

    Crystal description plate

    Wavelength 0.71073 Å

    Crystal system monoclinic

    Space group P 21/c

    Unit cell dimensions a = 12.896(5) Å α = 90°

    b = 5.723(2) Å β = 98.190(8)°

    c = 11.287(5) Å γ = 90°

    Volume 824.5(6) Å3

    Z 4

    Cell measurement reflections used 1353

    Cell measurement theta min/max 3.19° to 27.32°

    Diffractometer control software Bruker AXS SMART Vers. 5.054 1997/98

    Diffractometer measurement device Siemens SMART CCD area detector system

    Diffractometer measurement method Full sphere data collection

    in omega at 0.3° scan width

    two runs with 720 frames, phi = 0°, 270°

    and two runs with 436 frames, phi = 88°, 180°

    Theta range for data collection 3.19° to 28.30°

    Completeness to theta = 28.30° 97.8 %

    Index ranges -17

  • 6

    Computing structure solution Bruker AXS SHELXTL Vers.6.10, DOS/WIN95/NT/2000

    Computing structure refinement Bruker AXS SHELXTL Vers.6.10, DOS/WIN95/NT/2000

    Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2

    Reflections collected 4936

    Independent reflections 2008 [R(int) = 0.0331]

    Data / restraints / parameters 1221 / 0 / 136

    Goodness-of-fit on F2 0.962

    Weighting details w = 1/[σ2 (Fo2)+ (0.1095*P)2]

    where P = (Fo2+2Fc2)/3

    Final R indices [I>2sigma(I)] R1 = 0.0609, wR2 = 0.1462

    R indices (all data) R1 = 0.0967, wR2 = 0.1705

    Largest diff. peak and hole 0.419 and -0.231 eÅ-3

    Treatment of hydrogen atoms Riding model on idealized geometries

    with the 1.2 fold isotropic displacement

    parameters of the equivalent Uij of the

    corresponding carbon atom

  • 7

    Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement for TI.

    Identification code TI

    Empirical formula C15 H18

    Formula weight 198.29 Da

    Density (calculated) 1.172 g cm-3

    F(000) 432

    Temperature 203(2) K

    Crystal size 0.45 x 0.32 x 0.21 mm

    Crystal color colorless

    Crystal description block

    Wavelength 0.71073 Å

    Crystal system monoclinic

    Space group P21/c

    Unit cell dimensions a = 11.920(3) Å α = 90°

    b = 6.0733(13) Å β = 110.670(4)°

    c = 16.584(4) Å γ = 90°

    Volume 1123.4(4) Å3

    Z 4

    Cell measurement reflections used 2165

    Cell measurement two theta min/max 5.196° to 47.370°

    Diffractometer control software Bruker AXS SMART Vers. 5.054 1997/98

    Diffractometer measurement device Siemens SMART CCD area detector system

    Diffractometer measurement method Full sphere data collection

    in omega at 0.3° scan width

    two runs with 720 frames, phi = 0°, 270°

    and two runs with 436 frames, phi = 88°, 180°

    Theta range for data collection 1.83° to 27.00°

    Completeness to theta = 27.00° 99.4 %

    Index ranges -15

  • 8

    Computing structure refinement Bruker AXS SHELXTL Vers. 6.10 DOS/WIN95/NT/2000

    Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2

    Reflections collected 12490

    Independent reflections 2443 [R(int) = 0.0696]

    Data / restraints / parameters 1428 / 0 / 136

    Goodness-of-fit on F2 0.974

    Weighting details w = 1/[σ2 (Fo2)+ (0.0589P)2+0.5439P]

    where P = (Fo2+2Fc2)/3

    Final R indices [I>2sigma(I)] R1 = 0.0559, wR2 = 0.1260

    R indices (all data) R1 = 0.1051, wR2 = 0.1610

    Largest diff. peak and hole 0.208 and -0.139 eÅ-3

    Treatment of hydrogen atoms Riding model on idealized geometries

    with the 1.2 fold isotropic displacement

    parameters of the equivalent Uij of the

    corresponding carbon atom

  • 9

    Crystal structure of TI

    view along b-axis

    view along a-axis

  • 10

    Powder X-ray Diffraction

    Powder diffraction data were collected on a Siemens D5000 Powder X-ray Diffractometer with 7° OED. The sample was obtained by grinding the crystals grown from methanol solution of Form I and micro crystals of pure TNB. The powder diffractogram recorded is shown below. The powder patterns for Form I, II and III are simulated using the program, Platon.[1] There were no discrepancies noted between the experimental and simulation in terms of 2θ values for Form I and Pure TNB; the experimental pattern was found to be consistent in several samples. This shows there is no phase transition in the pure sample and is same as Form I. In contrast, the simulated powder patterns of form II and III shows that indeed they are different from Form I and are formed due to the additive, TI.

    [1] Platon–version 1.05, 2002: A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr. 1990, A46, C34.

  • 11

  • 12

    DSC Diffrential scanning thermograms for Form I and pure TNB were recorded on

    NETZSCH, Phoenix DSC 2004. The thermograms are shown below. There were no

    additional peaks in the thermograms indicating phase transition.

  • 13

    Melting Point Melting point of crystals of Form I and Form III were recorded on Olympus BX40 hot

    stage microscope connected with Wagner & Munz Poly Therm A heater. The melting

    point pictures are shown below. The Melting Point (MP) analysis shows that the Form I

    crystals melts at lower temperature (mp: 121.8 °C) than Form III crystals (mp: 122.7 °C)

    which suggests that Form I is kinetic and From III is thermodynamic.

    Form I crystals

    Form I crystal at room temperature

    Melting of Form I crystal at 122.7 °C

  • 14

    Form III crystals

    Form III crystal at room temperature

    Melting of Form III crystal at 122.7 °C

  • 15

    Morphology of Form I

    Crystal faces have been calculated using BDFH method in Morphology module in

    Cerius2 program. Atom-atom potentials were estimated using Dreiding 2.21 force field

    and atomic charges were estimated using the charge equilibration method. Cerius2,

    Accelrys, Cambridge (UK). See www.accelrys.com

    Morphology of Form I Form I : Pbca (two molecules in the asymmetric unit) ------------------

    specified minimum slice thickness gave rise to too many faces. Minimum slice thickness actually used is 3.000 Angstroms. The total surface area is 2308.7288 units Area of face ( 4 0 2) is 0.0000 units List Areas by form Form { 1 0 2} accounts for 27.27 percent of the total area.

  • 16

    Form { 1 1 1} accounts for 39.42 percent of the total area. Form { 0 0 2} accounts for 33.31 percent of the total area.

    Calculate Angle between 4 0 2 and -4 0 2 is Angle between normals to ( 4 0 2) and ( -4 0 2) is 153.4763 degrees Internal angle between ( 4 0 2) ) and ( -4 0 2) is 26.5237 degrees. Aspect ratio is : 2.3754 List of First Two Faces -------------------------------------------------------------- H K L Distance Color D-spacing Area Corners ( 0 0 2) 7.5182 PINK 13.3011 384.5252 6 ( 0 0 -2) 7.5182 PINK 13.3011 384.5252 6 ( 1 0 2) 10.9599 PINK 9.1241 157.3730 4 ( -1 0 2) 10.9599 PINK 9.1241 157.3730 4 ( -1 0 -2) 10.9599 PINK 9.1241 157.3730 4 ( 1 0 -2) 10.9599 PINK 9.1241 157.3730 4

  • 17

    Table 3. Dihedral angles of TNB polymorphs

    Form I Form II Form II I

    τ1 5.5 1.6 3.5

    τ2 4.1 13.5 6.7

    τ3 31.9 4.2 8.7

    τ4 6.6 4.3

    τ5 9.9 3.9

    τ6 10.4 2.5

    Table 4. Geometrical parameters of hydrogen bonds

    Interaction d (Å)a D (Å) θ (º)

    Form I C–H···O 2.98 3.84 137.1

    C–H···O 2.21 3.29 173.0

    C–H···O 2.25 3.26 155.0

    C–H···O 2.87 3.90 160.4

    C–H···O 2.90 3.93 159.0

    N–O···O 3.04 157.0

    N–O···O 2.97 151.0

    N–O···N 2.86 152.0

    N–O···N 2.97 142.2

    Form II C–H···O 2.35 3.41 165.5

    C–H···O 2.45 3.48 158.7

    C–H···O 2.41 3.48 170.1

    C–H···O 2.63 3.48 134.9

    C–H···O 2.27 3.31 159.2

    C–H···N 3.08 4.13 164.0

    C–H···N 2.69 3.70 154.1

  • 18

    C–H···N 2.81 3.84 158.1

    N–O···O 3.00 153.0

    N–O···O 3.14 156.6

    N–O···O 2.97 139.3

    N–O···N 2.84 143.0

    N–O···N 2.97 146.0

    N–O···N 2.78 159.0

    Form III C–H···O 2.69 3.73 161.1

    C–H···O 2.46 3.21 125.3

    C–H···O 2.43 3.40 147.6

    C–H···O 2.34 3.40 166.0

    C–H···O 2.85 3.78 144.1

    N–O···O 2.94 144.6

    N–O···N 2.99 124.2

    N–O···N 2.989 124.0

    N–O···N 2.99 150.2

    N–O···N 3.01 140.0

  • 19

    Cambridge Structural Database (CSD)

    The N-O···N interactions were searched in aromatic nitro compounds in the CSD. The search was performed using CSD 5.23 April 2002 version. The following screens were used: R-factor < or = 7.5, no disorder, no ions, only organics, 3D coordinates present.

    Scatter plot of N···O interactions in CSD

    The N···O distances in the Forms I, II and III are shown with colour in the figure. Blue

    circle (Form I), Red square (Form II), Pink triangle (Form III). The N···O interaction in

    Form II is one of the shortest such interactions in CSD.

  • 20

    Supramolecular Synthons

    H

    O2N

    O2N

    N

    O

    O NO

    O

    N

    O

    O

    NO

    OH

    N

    OO H

    NOO

    HN O

    O

    H

    O2N

    H

    NO O

    H

    NO

    O

    H

    N

    O

    O

    NO2

    NO2

    N

    O

    O

    N OO

    HO2N

    I (Form I) II (Form II)

    III (Form II) IV (Form III)

    Hits = 2 Hits = 342

    Hits = 0 Hits = 6

    The occurrences of the above supramolecular synthons in Forms I, II and III was

    searched for aromatic nitro compounds in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). The

    search was performed using CSD 5.23 April 2002 version. There are only 2 hits for

    synthon I (Form I), 0 hits for synthon III (Form II) and 6 hits for synthon IV (Form III).

    However, synthon II in Form II (hits 342) is very commonly observed in the CSD. The

    N-O···N distance in synthon II which is observed in Form II is one of the shortest in

    CSD.