41
Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions Top 10 Estate Planning Mistakes November 15, 2011 7 Hotel Street Warrenton, VA 20186 www.handfordfinancial.com

Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

  • Upload
    micol

  • View
    27

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions Top 10 Estate Planning Mistakes November 15, 2011 7 Hotel Street Warrenton, VA 20186 www.handfordfinancial.com. Macro Economic Strife. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Planning Vs. ReactingA Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Top 10 Estate Planning Mistakes November 15, 2011

7 Hotel Street Warrenton, VA 20186

www.handfordfinancial.com

Page 2: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Macro Economic Strife

Page 3: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Board of Certified Financial Planners

Investments

Estate

RetirementTax Efficiency

Risk Management

Page 4: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

A Clear Path

Page 5: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Choices, Wrong Turns, Indecision

Page 6: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Healthy Habits

Page 7: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Unhealthy Habits

Page 8: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Board of Certified Financial Planners

Investments

Estate

RetirementTax Efficiency

Risk Management

Page 9: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Emotional v. Rational

Page 10: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

A Solid Plan

Page 11: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Planning Vs. ReactingA Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic

Conditions

Page 12: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Name That Feeling

Page 13: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

The Emotional Reality• You are not alone.

– Fear and anxiety have become commonplace as the market continues to experience periods of fluctuation.

– The reality is that your investments have likely declined along with theoverall market performance.

• An emotional response is a natural response.– We’re humans, not machines! Emotions will always play a role in how

we deal with challenging situations.– But how can we acknowledge our emotions and still manage our finances?

• Take some time to verbalize how you feel.– Sometimes simply stating how you feel or writing it down can help release

the tension.– Once you’ve respected the emotion, you may be able to focus on action.

Page 14: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

666

Page 15: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

S&P 500

1565 October 9, 2007666 March 6, 2009 (57.44%)1250 November 8, 2011 87%

Page 16: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

What’s the Secret to Worrying Less?

• No magic bullet• Empowerment through action• The benefits of financial planning– Results of a recent study* by the Financial

Planning Association and a leading financial institution

Page 17: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Study Statistics Worth Noting• 50% of the planning participants feel that they are in

control of their financial future.

• 9 out of 10 planning participants (88%) feel that they have clear financial direction, which is about 50% higher than those who don’t have professional support.

Page 18: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

• Planning participants are 50% more likely to say their goalsand dreams are financially secure.

• 42% of planning participants feel extremely or very prepared for retirement (vs. 16% of those without an advisor).

Study Statistics Worth Noting continued

Page 19: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

What’s Most Important to You?• One benefit of planning is that it gets you thinking

about whatis really most important to you.

• Your concerns over your finances are likely more specific than“I want more money.”– What is the “why?” behind your goals?

• What is meaningful to you may not always be quantified in dollarsand cents.

Page 20: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Important, Intangible Goals• We already mentioned that some of the items that are

important to you are going to be less tangible, like:– Family– Community service– Leaving a legacy

• These intangible items can be reframed in terms of quantifiable financial planning goals, like:– Protecting your family by having adequate insurance– Leaving behind a legacy with a properly structured estate plan– Giving back to your community with a charitable trust

Page 21: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

A Methodical Approach to What-If Worries

• It’s normal to question how things would look for you if differentvariables changed.– How will adjusting certain goals for time and cost impact your

ability to attain them?– What if you were to save more and spend less?– What if you had to save less?– What if your investments declined more or less over time?

• A Monte Carlo simulation can provide perspective– Takes into account the bad years (kind of like what we’re seeing now)

and shuffles the cards in order to convey a realistic expectation of what could

happen based on different scenarios.

Page 22: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

A Written Financial Plan• Road map to your goals• Includes probability of reaching goals based on testing• Living, breathing document

– A good plan is updated regularly—typically annually—to ensure that it still matches your current situation and accounts for any changes.

– A financial professional monitors the plan and keeps you on track with your goals.

– Just like no two clients are alike, no two plans are alike!

Page 23: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

The Planning Process

Page 24: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

You Don’t Have to Go It Alone

• Taking control does not mean you have to uncover all of the solutions on your own.

• A financial professional can assist you with:– Goal definition– A written financial plan– Financial planning for

• Estate plan coordination• Retirement income planning• Charitable giving• Risk management• And . . . everything else!

• Proactive planning = Less anxiety

Page 25: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Top 10 Estate Planning Mistakes

Page 26: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

We Hear About Celebrities’ Problems . . .

Page 27: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Estates of Famous PeopleName Gross Estate Settlement Cost Net Estate % ShrinkageW.C. Fields $884,680 $329,793 $554,887 37%Humphrey Bogart $910,146 $274,234 $635,912 30%Clark Gable $2,806,526 $1,101,038 $1,705,488 30%Walt Disney $23,004,851 $6,811,943 $16,192,908 30%William Boeing $22,386,158 $10,589,748 $11,796,410 47%

Name Gross Estate Settlement Cost Net Estate % Shrinkage

Marilyn Monroe $819,176 $448,750 $370,426 55%

Elvis Presley $10,165,434 $7,374,635 $2,790,799 73%

J.P. Morgan $17,121,482 $11,893,691 $5,227,791 69%

Alwin C. Ernst, CPA $12,642,431 $7,124,112 $5,518,319 56%Frederick Vanderbuilt $76,838,530 $42,846,112 $33,992,418 56%

Estates that made use of the marital deduction

Estates where the marital deduction was not used or unavailable

Source: Public Probate Records. Under current laws the costs would be different.

Page 28: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Could That Happen to Us?

Page 29: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

1. Failure to Plan

• State intestacy laws determine whom will inherit what.

Page 30: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

1. Failure to Plan continued

Other considerations:

• Court-appointed guardians and executors• Additional expense and time required to

distribute property• Missed opportunity to minimize taxes• State may become beneficiary

Page 31: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

2. Failure to Implement

• Misconception: once documents are executed, process is done

• Reviewing and re-titling assets and reviewing beneficiary designations

• No implementation may result in ineffective plan (see #1)

Page 32: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

3. Failure to Update

Triggering life events:• Marriage• Divorce• Birth• Death

Page 33: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Other triggers:• Change in law• Change in asset value• Change in goals

Page 34: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

4. Failure to Review Beneficiary Designations

• Easiest way to derail a plan• Perform an audit:

– Life insurance– Retirement accounts– Nonqualified annuities– Transfer-on-death accounts– Trusts– Wills – Special needs

Page 35: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

5. Failure to Understand the Plan

• Allocation of assets between spouses– Portability provision

• Structure of policies and titling of assets– Joint tenancy with right of survivorship– Community property vs. separate property– Contractual agreements

Page 36: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

6. Failure to Make Lifetime Gifts

• Leveraging gift tax exemptions: a simple and cost-effective way to reduce estate value

• Irrevocable life insurance trusts (ILITs)• 529 plans

Page 37: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

7. Choosing the Wrong Fiduciary

• Inexperienced, unqualified, or self-serving• The “bad guy”• Family conflict

Page 38: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

8. A Plan That’s Too Simple

• All-to-spouse or joint ownership arrangements

• Unintended beneficiaries• Lack of efficiency• Effort to save hundreds costs thousands

Page 39: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

9. A Plan That’s Too Complex

• What are the goals?– Asset protection– Liquidity– Efficiency– Control

• GRAT, CLAT, FLP, CRUT . . .• Administrative duties

Page 40: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

10. A Plan with No Flexibility

• Must be able to change in light of circumstances

• What does irrevocable mean?• Trustee discretion

Page 41: Planning Vs. Reacting A Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Planning Vs. ReactingA Proactive Approach to Challenging Economic Conditions

Top 10 Estate Planning Mistakes November 15, 2011

7 Hotel Street Warrenton, VA 20186

www.handfordfinancial.com