56
Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10 Breakout D Breakout D Pharmacopoieal Requirements and the New ICH Quality and the New ICH Quality Paradigm – Time for a Change? International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use

Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10

Breakout DBreakout DPharmacopoieal Requirements and the New ICH Qualityand the New ICH Quality Paradigm – Time for a Change?

International Conference on Harmonisation of TechnicalRequirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use

Page 2: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

IntroductionS f• Structure of this session

- Presentation of key principles of the European- Presentation of key principles of the European Pharmacopoeia – General Notices, General Chapters, General Monographs

- Case study / discussion- Breakout report

slide 2Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 3: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General NoticesGeneral Notices

slide 3Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 4: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General NoticesPut at the very beginning of the Ph. Eur. (page 1), y g g (p g )they address general issues and are aimed at providing the basic information to the user.

► Apply to all texts► Rules to understand texts, conventional expressions► Rules to understand texts, conventional expressions

Essential reading before starting to use monographs

slide 4Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 5: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: what is repeated at least 3000 times in the Ph Eur ?times in the Ph. Eur.?• A: Test for heavy metals• B: Reference to BSE/TSE• C: Reference to General Notices

D U l th i j tifi d d th i d• D: « Unless otherwise justified and authorised »

slide 5Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 6: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: What is repeated at least 3000 times in the Ph Eur ?times in the Ph. Eur.?• A: Test for heavy metals• B: Reference to BSE/TSE• C: Reference to General Notices

D U l th i j tifi d d th i d• D: « Unless otherwise justified and authorised »

slide 6Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 7: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

?? Typical questions that are answered in the General Notices

► Do specifications apply throughout shelf-life?► Are alternative methods allowed?► Are alternative methods allowed?► The monograph specifies 1.000 g to be weighed for the

test, what is the tolerance?► Is Solubility a mandatory requirement?► Is the Second Identification compulsory?

slide 7Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 8: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Alt ti th dAlternative methodsPh. Eur. tests are reference methods, essential in cases,of disputeCompliance is required, but alternative methods may bep q yused as long as they lead to the same pass/fail result. Itis the responsibility of the user to demonstrate theirsuitability. Approval of the competent authority isnecessary in many cases.

slide 8Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 9: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: The monograph specifies 1 000 g to beQuiz: The monograph specifies 1.000 g to be weighed for the test (test with a numerical limit)

• A: You must weigh between 0.9995 and 1.0005g• B: You may weigh a quantity between 0 9 and 1 1 g but• B: You may weigh a quantity between 0.9 and 1.1 g, but

with a tolerance of +/- 0.5 mg• C: You must weigh exactly 1.000 g

slide 9Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 10: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: The monograph specifies 1.000 g to be weighed for the test (test with a numerical limit)

• A: You must weigh between 0.9995 and 1.0005g• B: You may weigh a quantity between 0.9 and 1.1 g, but with a y g q y g,

tolerace of +/- 0.5 mg• C: You must weigh exactly 1.000 g

slide 10Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 11: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: The monograph specifies 1.0 g to be weighed for a comparative test (sulphates, chlorides etc )chlorides, etc…)

• A: You must weigh between 0.95 and 1.05gA: You must weigh between 0.95 and 1.05g• B: You may weigh a quantity between 0.9 and 1.1

g, but with a tolerace of +/- 0.05 g• C: You must weigh exactly 1.0 g

slide 11Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 12: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: The monograph specifies 1.0 g to be weighed for a comparative test (sulphates, chlorides etc )chlorides, etc…)

• A: You must weigh between 0.95 and 1.05g• B: You may weigh a quantity between 0.9 and 1.1

g, but with a tolerace of +/- 0.05 g• C: You must weigh exactly 1 0 gC: You must weigh exactly 1.0 g

slide 12Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 13: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Q i Th h ifi 1 0 l fQuiz: The monograph specifies 1.0 ml of a solution to used for a test

• A: You have to use between 0.95 ml and 1.05 ml• B: You have to sample the solution with aB: You have to sample the solution with a

pipette, a volumetric flask or a burette• C: You have to use a balance for the

determination

slide 13Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 14: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: Quiz: The monograph specifies 1.0 ml of a solution The monograph specifies 1.0 ml of a solution to be used for a testto be used for a test

• A: You have to use between 0.95 ml and 1.05 ml• B: You have to sample the solution with a pipetteB: You have to sample the solution with a pipette,

a volumetric flask or a burette• C: You have to use a balance for the

determination

slide 14Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 15: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Sample size• Accuracy defined by the number of significantAccuracy defined by the number of significant

figures: 1.000 g ⇒ ± 0.5 mg• For test/assay with calculated result, amount to y ,

be used is within 10 % (absorbance, water, loss on drying etc.)

• For comparative tests (sulphates, chlorides, etc.) amount defined by number of significant figures: 1 0 g ⇒ 0 95-1 04 g1.0 g ⇒ 0.95-1.04 g

slide 15Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 16: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Q i I h d d h dQuiz: I have demonstrated that my process does not generate an impurity for which a test is prescribed in the monographprescribed in the monograph

• A: Compliance with Ph. Eur. necessitates the verification that the test is performed on each batch to verify that the level of the impurity isbatch to verify that the level of the impurity is below the specific limit

• B: The test does not need to be carried out atB: The test does not need to be carried out at all

slide 16Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 17: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial RequirementsQuiz: I have demonstrated that my process does notQuiz: I have demonstrated that my process does not generate an impurity for which a test is prescribed in the monographg p

• A: Compliance with Ph Eur necessitates the verificationA: Compliance with Ph. Eur. necessitates the verification that the test is performed on each batch to verify that the level of the impurity is below the specific limitB Th t t d t d t b i d t t ll• B: The test does not need to be carried out at all

slide 17Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 18: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Q i Th h ib t t fQuiz: The monograph prescribes a test for sterility

• A: A sterility test is to be used for compliance to Ph. Eur.

• B: I have demonstrated by appropriate equipment validation and in process controls that my process will consistently lead to a sterile product. With the agreement of the competent authority a sterility test can be omittedcan be omitted

slide 18Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 19: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Q i Th h ib t t fQuiz: The monograph prescribes a test for sterility

• A: A sterility test is to be used for compliance to Ph. EurEur.

• B: I have demonstrated by appropriate equipment validation and in process controls that my processvalidation and in process controls that my process will consistently lead to a sterile product. With the agreement of the competent authority a sterility test

b itt dcan be omitted

slide 19Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 20: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Waiving of tests

• In some cases some tests may be omitted based on validation data or other suitable justification

• Tests for process-specific impurities may be omitted if it is demonstrated that the ill not occ r ith theit is demonstrated that they will not occur with the particular process used

slide 20Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 21: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Waiving of tests

• « The manufacturer may obtain assurance that a product is of Pharmacopoeia quality from data derived, f l f lid ti t di f thfor example, from validation studies of the manufacturing process and from in-process controls. Parametric release in circumstances deemedParametric release in circumstances deemed appropriate by the competent authority is thus not precluded by the need to comply with the Ph iPharmacopoeia. »

slide 21Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 22: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Legal status of monographs

• Monographs are “official standards” • The Convention on the Elaboration of a European

Pharmacopoeia makes the texts of the Ph EurPharmacopoeia makes the texts of the Ph. Eur. mandatory in all signatory parties

• The pharmaceutical legislation in the European Union p g pmakes monographs obligatory standards (2001/83/EC, 2001/81/EC)

• Monographs may be accepted as suitable standards• Monographs may be accepted as suitable standards even when not obligatory

slide 22Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 23: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: Reference to regulatory documents

• A: When the Ph. Eur. refers to a regulatory document (e g EU note for guidance) it becomesdocument (e.g. EU note for guidance) it becomes mandatory.

• B: Reference to a regulatory document does not change its original status

slide 23Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 24: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: Reference to regulatory documents

• A: When the Ph. Eur. refers to a regulatory document (e.g. EU note for guidance) it becomes mandatory.

• B: Reference to a regulatory document does not change its original stat schange its original status

slide 24Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 25: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Reference to regulatory documents

• « These references are provided for information for users for the Pharmacopoeia. Inclusion of such a reference does not modify the status of thereference does not modify the status of the documents referred to, which may be mandatory or for guidance. »

General Notices, 7th edition

slide 25Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 26: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Q i D Ph E ifi ti lQuiz: Do Ph. Eur. specifications apply throughout shelf-life?

• A: Yes, specifications apply until time of use for raw materials and throughout period of validity forraw materials and throughout period of validity for preparations

• B: No, Ph. Eur. requirements are for release only.

slide 26Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 27: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Q i D Ph E ifi ti lQuiz: Do Ph. Eur. specifications apply throughout shelf-life?

• A: Yes, specifications apply until time of use for raw materials and throughout period of validity for g p ypreparations

• B: No, Ph. Eur. requirements are for release only.

slide 27Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 28: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

What does compliance mean?

• Compliance with a monograph• All mandatory parts of a monograph

C f f• Compliance until time of use for raw materials, ingredients

• Compliance throughout period of validity for• Compliance throughout period of validity for preparations

• In-use compliance decided by licensing authority forIn use compliance decided by licensing authority for each preparation

slide 28Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 29: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Wh t t l ?What must comply?

• Mandatory for all substances for pharmaceutical useMandatory for all substances for pharmaceutical use• Ingredients (incl. excipients) of final formulation• Components of solvents, buffers etc in or used to make up

final formulation• Solvents used for purification? If a monograph exists, then

compliance will usually be requiredcompliance will usually be required• Reagents? Not usually needed for upstream use

slide 29Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 30: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

What is mandatory?

• Mandatory unless otherwise indicated:- Characters, Storage, Functionality-related

Characteristics sectionsCharacteristics sections• “Should” ⇒ informative or advisory (i.e. not

mandatory)y)• “This chapter/section is published for information

and guidance”

slide 30Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 31: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: Validation of Pharmacopoeial methods

• A: All methods of the Ph. Eur. need to be revalidated in order to check robustness

• B: Methods of the Ph Eur have been validated• B: Methods of the Ph. Eur. have been validated. Validation by the analyst is not required.

slide 31Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 32: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: Validation of Pharmacopoeial methods

• A: All methods of the Ph. Eur. need to be revalidated in order to check robustness

• B: Methods of the Ph Eur have been validated• B: Methods of the Ph. Eur. have been validated. Validation by the analyst is not required.

slide 32Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 33: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Validation of Pharmacopoeial methodsTh t t th d i i h d l• « The test methods given in monographs and general

chapters have been validated in accordance with accepted scientific practice and current recommendations on analytical validation. Unless otherwise stated in the monograph or general chapter, validation of the test methods by the analyst is not y yrequired. »

General Notices, 7th edition

slide 33Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 34: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Human and veterinary use• Unless otherwise stated monographs coverUnless otherwise stated, monographs cover

human and veterinary use• Where a substance is used in both human and

veterinary products, the same quality specification is appliedWh th h titl b “f t i• When the monograph title bears “for veterinary use” the substance is intended only for veterinary productsproducts

slide 34Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 35: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General ChaptersGeneral Chapters

slide 35Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 36: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Why general chapters?

• Analytical methods:- Editorial convenience : avoid repeating standard

methods in each monographmethods in each monograph- Provide standard methods that can be used where

there is no monograph- Give general requirements for equipment, equipment

verification

slide 36Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 37: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General chapters

“• Not mandatory “per se”• When referred to in a monograph, they become

part of the standardpart of the standard• Can be used for substances not covered by

monographs, may need validationmonographs, may need validation• Some general chapters are not referred to in any

monograph (Raman spectrometry): useful guidance, can be referred to in applications

slide 37Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 38: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General chapters (2)

• Many have validity or equipment-verification requirements

• These requirements become part of monograph• These requirements become part of monograph

slide 38Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 39: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Chromatographic separation techniquesChromatographic separation techniques 2.2.46

LC SEC GC TLC d SFC• LC, SEC, GC, TLC and SFC• System suitability:

- Peak symmetry- Repeatability (for assays)- Limit of quantification

• Adjustment of operating conditionsj p g• Requirements apply wherever methods are prescribed in

monographs

slide 39Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 40: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General chapters in section 5not analytical methodsnot analytical methods

5.1 Preparation of sterile products / Microbiology5 2 Production and QC of vaccines5.2 Production and QC of vaccines5.3 Statistical Analysis5.4 Residual solvents…5.9 Polymorphism5.10 Control of impurities (5.10)

slide 40Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 41: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Mi bi l i l litMicrobiological quality

• Microbiological examination of non-sterileMicrobiological examination of non sterile products: total viable aerobic count (2.6.12)

• Microbiological examination of non-sterile products: test for specified micro-organisms (2.6.13)

• Mi bi l i l lit f h ti l• Microbiological quality of pharmaceutical preparations (5.1.4)

slide 41Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 42: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General MonographsGeneral Monographs

slide 42Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 43: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Why general monographs?

• Two types:

- General monographs on classes of substances

- General monographs on dosage formsGeneral monographs on dosage forms

slide 43Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 44: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General monographs

• “Classes” defined by different criteria: production method, origin, risk factors

• Aspects that cannot be treated in each individual• Aspects that cannot be treated in each individual monograph- Residual solventsResidual solvents- TSE/BSE- Pesticides in herbals- etc.

slide 44Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 45: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General monographs (2)

• A l t ll d t• Apply to all products

• No cross-reference in individual monographs

CHECK WHICH GENERAL MONOGRAPH APPLIES!

slide 45Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 46: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: From general monographs and individual monographs which are the ones which have priority?• A: General monographs overrule individual

monographsmonographs• B: Individual monographs overrule general

monographsg p• C: There is no such priority

slide 46Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 47: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Quiz: From general monographs and individual monographs which are the ones which have priority?• A: General monographs overrule individual

monographsmonographs• B: Individual monographs overrule general

monographsg p• C: There is no such priority

slide 47Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 48: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

C l t it f G l & i di id lComplementarity of General & individual monographs

• « General monographs and individual monographs are complementary If themonographs are complementary. If the provisions of a general monograph do not apply to a particular product, this is expressly stated in the individual monograph. »

General notices, 7th edition

slide 48Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 49: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

General monographs on dosage forms• Contain requirements common to all dosage forms of q g

the type defined (tablets, capsules, parenteral preparations etc)

• Classified by pharmaceutical form/route of• Classified by pharmaceutical form/route of administration

• Applied during licensing• Framework specification: acceptance criteria and extra

tests are proposed by manufacturer and approved by competent authoritycompetent authority

slide 49Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 50: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Case Study

slide 50Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 51: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Bl di P C t l O tiBlending Process Control OptionsDecision on conventional vs. RTR testing

Key message: Both approaches to assure blend uniformity are valid in combination

slide 51Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

with other GMP requirements

Page 52: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

P C l O i 2Process Control Option 2Blend uniformity monitored using a process analyser• Control Strategy to assure homogeneity of the blend

- Control of blending end-point by NIRand feedback controlof blender- API particle size

In this case study, the y,company chooses to use online NIR to monitor blend uniformity to provide efficiency and more flexibility

slide 52Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

efficiency and more flexibility

Page 53: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

slide 53Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 54: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

slide 54Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

Page 55: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

RTRT of Assay and Content Uniformity• Finished Product Specification – use for stability, regulatory p y, g y

testing, site change, whenever RTR testing is not possible- Assay acceptance criteria: 95-105% of nominal amount (30mg)- Uniformity of Dosage Unit acceptance criteria- Test method: HPLC

• Real Time Release Testing Controls- Blend uniformity assured in blending step (online NIR spectrometer for

bl di d i t)blending end-point)- API assay is analyzed in blend by HPLC- Tablet weight control in compression step

• No end product testing for Assay and Content Uniformity (CU)• No end product testing for Assay and Content Uniformity (CU)- Would pass finished product specification for Assay and Uniformity of

Dosage Units if tested because assay assured by combination of blend uniformity assurance, API assay in blend and tablet weight control (if blend

slide 55Kuala Lumpur, July 2010

y y g (is homogeneous then tablet weight will determine content of API)

Page 56: Pharmacopoeial Requirements and the New ICH Quality Paradigm

ICH Quality Implementation Working Group - Integrated Implementation Training Workshop

Breakout D: Pharmacopoeial Requirements

Topics to discuss• Would RTR/on-line testing be in line with regulatoryWould RTR/on line testing be in line with regulatory

and pharmacopoeial requirements?• Does RTR have an impact on the sampling plan?• Which acceptance criteria would you apply? • Is there a need for changes in the pharmacopoeia?

Is the current structure of monographs adequate?

slide 56Kuala Lumpur, July 2010