48
Pervious Concrete Pilot Project A Case Study City of Tulsa April 2013 Mary E. Kell, AIA, NCARB, LEED © AP 1

Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Pervious Concrete Pilot Project

A Case StudyCity of TulsaApril 2013Mary E. Kell, AIA, NCARB, LEED © AP

1

Page 2: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Background

• Definition of the issue

• Building sustainably in public projects

• The case for Low Impact Development (LID)

2

Page 3: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Why design with LID in mind…

• As cities continue to be developed, so does the increased runoff from stormwater due to increased impervious surfaces

• The runoff gets transported through pipes and sewers to streams, rivers, lakes and other bodies of water

3

Page 4: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Why design with LID in mind

• Runoff from parking lots such as oil, fuel and, deicing salts harms water quality and aquatic life, and can cause pollution, erosion, increased flow of waterways and altered aquatic life

• Pervious concrete is a tool in the LID toolkit that can help reduce the need for larger infrastructure by limiting or reducing the amount of stormwater runoff

4

Page 5: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

What we did

• Provide a pervious concrete pilot project on City of Tulsa property

• Observe, monitor and measure a defined area of pervious concrete over a minimum 2-year time span

• Encourage participation from all interested public and private entities

5

Page 6: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Impediments that had to be addressed

• Lack of education and experience by Oklahoma contractors

As of March of 2012, only 2 contractors in the state of Oklahoma were certified by NRMCA (National Ready Mixed Concrete Association) to be able to place pervious concrete

• Three levels of certification: • Technician• Installer• Craftsman• http://nrmca.org/Education/Certifications/Pervious_Contractor.htm

for more information on the certification levels

6

Page 7: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

More Impediments…

• Cost – lack of familiarity with pervious concrete has typically driven up costs in projects and is commonly value-engineered out or not designed in the project to start with for Oklahoma projects

• Lack of support of a “new product” from City of Tulsa Engineering – a City project cannot afford to be on the cutting edge and risk failure when using public money

7

Page 8: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Impediments, continued

• Performance data for a time-tested project constructed in Oklahoma (not a different part of the country where climate varies and / or sustainability has been accepted on a broader level, such as Portland, OR, Chicago, IL or Austin, TX)

• Public awareness

• Technical specification development

8

Page 9: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

The Plan

• In the summer of 2011 a group started gathering and meeting at regular intervals

• The group included contractors, academia, industry concrete educators and organizations, engineers, architects, builders, inspectors and code officials from the City of Tulsa, all of whom have a common personal interest in making things greener

9

Page 10: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

How we did it

• This project was primarily put together due to the volunteer efforts of many to make it happen

• After realizing that the “impediments that had to be addressed” could actually be turned into task items, the group went to work

10

Page 11: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Timeline

• 7/27/11 – First meeting:

• Included definition of obstacles / impediments and concerns and introductions of roles, skills and resources

• Defined the need for a test project to educate the majority of those involved

• Defined the need to educate the majority of interested attendees

11

Page 12: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Timeline

• 8/23/11 – Second meeting:

• Included gathering information on commonly perceived issues with pervious such as freeze thaw, durability and maintenance concerns.

• Location of a project site owned by the City of Tulsa underway

12

Page 13: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Timeline

• 10/3/11 – Site visit to Twin Cities and GCC Mid-Continent, two ready-mixed concrete plants in Tulsa with pervious slabs that had been placed in the Tulsa area for 5+ years

13

Page 14: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

GCC Mid-Continent Concrete site visit

14

Page 15: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Twin Cities site visit

15

Page 16: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Timeline

• 11/29/11 – City of Tulsa site chosen, percolation test results review, performance spec development.

3 bores taken - .5” to 1.42” / hour percolation rate8.5” asphalt over 6” agg base, dark gray silty sand with gravel, fill

• 1/20/12 and 2/9/12 – Meetings to coordinate upcoming certification seminar and demonstration pour

16

Page 17: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Existing SiteCity of Tulsa West Yard

17

Page 18: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Existing SiteCity of Tulsa West Yard

18

Page 19: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Timeline

• 3/6/12 – PC Certification seminar by the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association (NRMCA); reduced rates offered

• 20 people certified as pervious Technicians = 1,000% increase of pervious Technicians in Oklahoma.

• Still need to get more contractors with experience in Installer and Craftsman levels

19

Page 20: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Timeline

• 3/7/12 – Demonstration pour• Technical specifications and pervious concrete consultation by the

South Central Cement Promotion Association, OMRCA and NRMCA• 5 slabs from 5 different ready-mix companies, all placed by Cantera

Concrete• Slab materials, labor and time donated by Arrow Concrete, Dolese

Brothers Company, GCC-Mid-Continent Concrete, Twin Cities Ready Mix Concrete, and Eagle Redi-Mix

• Subbase materials donated by Greenhill Materials• Excavation of subbase and subbase placed by City of Tulsa• TV and Radio Station Media present

20

Page 21: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Details on pour

• 100’ x 12’ total area• 2,000 SF additional draining onto pervious area• Each of the 5 slabs were 20’ wide by 12’ wide• ¾” wide HDPE resin lumber expansion joints between

each slab• ¾” wide x 1- ¾” deep tooled joint was cut at middle (10’)

of each of the 5 slabs• 18” of washed #57 rock subbase• 5- ½” thick pervious over rock subbase

21

Page 22: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Site Plan of pour

22

Page 23: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

ORMCA Newsletter: Told our story - positive press!

23

Page 24: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Pour

The morning of the pour – expansion joints in place between the slabs

24

Page 25: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

The area, ready for the pour

25

Page 26: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

The first slab being poured and worked into place

26

Page 27: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Power screed following the drop from the truck

27

Page 28: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Roller, following power screed leveling

28

Page 29: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Working the concrete – crew of 6 to 829

Page 30: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Plastic wrap immediately following pour30

Page 31: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Sandbags on 2 x 4’s to hold down the plastic

31

Page 32: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Detail of expansion joint spacers in-between slabs

32

Page 33: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Close up of roller

33

Page 34: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Pouring the last slab, covering up with plastic immediately following

34

Page 35: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Weighing samples of each slab, each sample rodded but not compacted

35

Page 36: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

One week later - removal of plastic, variation in colors of the slabs evident

36

Page 37: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

One week later – hose showing water flow

37

Page 38: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

One week later – concrete truck flowing water on slabs

38

Page 39: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Testing

• Infiltration testing per ASTM C1701/C170M-09 currently being conducted every quarter by Professor Jason Vogel and his graduate students with Oklahoma State University (OSU)

• Metal rings were made by OSU

• Single vs. double ring testing

39

Page 40: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Quarterly Infiltration TestingStep One: Place metal ring on slab, put plumber’s putty around the base of the metal ring

40

Page 41: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Step Two:Pre-wetting the area to be tested, time recorded

41

Page 42: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Step Three:Recording the time it takes a documented amount of water to flow through the slab, keeping ½ nch of water head during pour. 42

Page 43: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Alternate method of testing – double ring infiltration testA non-typical pervious pavement test that was tried to compare the ASTM standard with a typical method used for soil infiltration.

By utilizing the second ring, we were attempting to ensure that the middle ring is only showing the vertical movement of the water.

In general, our results indicated that there was no detectable difference unless the flow was pretty low (less than 300 in/hr or so). Also note that we only tried this one time, so these results are very limited.

While the double-ring method measures infiltration only, the standard single ring method is meant to be used as a consistent, repeatable measure of determining if the pavement is clogged.

43

Page 44: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Infiltration Testing - Results

44

Page 45: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Testing

• Acceptable range is 200-1800 inches per hour

• As of the 5th quarterly test conducted in March 2013, a year after the pour, all but one slab is well within or above range!

• SUCCESS

45

Page 46: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

What’s Next?

• First City of Tulsa project to use pervious concrete starts construction April of 2013

• Tulsa Fire Department Safety Training Center, located on the Tulsa Community College (TCC) northeast campus

• Pervious planned around drill tower, class A burn unit pad and winding sidewalk connection to TCC

46

Page 47: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

The group

• Special thanks to everyone who helped make this pilot project an ongoing success!

• The group included: o Concrete contractorso Ready-mix concrete supplierso National and Oklahoma Ready Mixed Concrete Associationo South Central Cement Promotion Association – part of the

Portland Cement Associationo Oklahoma State University (OSU) staffo City of Tulsa engineers and architects

47

Page 48: Pervious Concrete Pilot Project COT 042413

Questions?

• Mary E. Kell, AIA, NCARB, LEED © AP• [email protected]• (918) 596-2582 office

48