16
Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the PROPPER Study Gary K. Tan, D.O. Gerard D. Henry, M.D. Anthony J. Bella, M.D. Edward Karpman, M.D. William O. Brant, M.D. Mohit Khera, M.D., M.B.A., M.P.H. Bryan T. Kansas, M.D., M.P.H. Nelson E. Bennett, M.D. Tobias S. Kohler, M.D., M.P.H. Eugene Y. Rhee, M.D., M.B.A. Leroy A. Jones, M.D. Brian S. Christine, M.D.

Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

PROPPER Study

Gary K. Tan, D.O.Gerard D. Henry, M.D.Anthony J. Bella, M.D.

Edward Karpman, M.D.William O. Brant, M.D.

Mohit Khera, M.D., M.B.A., M.P.H.Bryan T. Kansas, M.D., M.P.H.

Nelson E. Bennett, M.D.Tobias S. Kohler, M.D., M.P.H.Eugene Y. Rhee, M.D., M.B.A.

Leroy A. Jones, M.D.Brian S. Christine, M.D.

Page 2: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Disclosure

• This study is supported by Boston Scientific, Inc.

Page 3: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Objective

• Assess penile prosthesis (PP) utilization at one and two years after AMS PP placement in men with ED using PROPPER

Page 4: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Method

• PROPPER

– Prospective Registry of Outcomes with Penile Prosthesis for Erectile Restoration

– 11 sites in US and Canada

– IRB/EC oversight

– Patients received AMS 700, Ambicor, or Spectra

Page 5: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Method

• Patients who answered device use question were included

• Utilization was analyzed by:– Age

– Etiology of ED

– Device model

– Race

– Etc

Page 6: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Results

• 826 patients included at one year

• 554 patients included at two years

Page 7: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Age

Average Age

1 Year Two Years

N 737 490

Avg ± SD 63.8 ± 9.8 63.4 ± 9.8

Page 8: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Utilization by ED Etiology

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

1 Yr

2 Yrs

90%

225/242

161/176

153/178

97/115

139/155

93/103

64/74

50/58

10/12

8/10

146/165

81/92

93% 92% 86%84%

90% 87% 86%83% 80%

89% 88%

Page 9: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Utilization by Device Type

100%

83.3%89.2%

100%

85.7%88.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Spectra Ambicor AMS 700

1 Year

2 Years

10/10 2/2 15/18 6/7712/ 798

482/ 545

Page 10: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Utilization by Race

90%

85%

88%

100%

89%

85%

87%

95%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

White AfricanAmerican

Hispanic Other

1 Year

2 Years

600/ 670

403/ 454

93/ 109

56/ 66

22/ 25

13/ 15

20/ 20

18/ 19

Page 11: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Utilization by Penile Girth

• With device inflated (1 yr post-op)

– 11.6 ± 2.3 cm (n=157)

• With device inflated (2 yr post-op)

– 12.6 ± 1.2 cm (n=32)

Page 12: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Utilization by Penile Length

• With device inflated (1 yr)

– 12.4 ± 2.5 cm (n=488)

• With device inflated (2 yr)

– 12.3 ± 2.5 cm (n=356)

Page 13: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Utilization by Other Variables

• No significant difference in utilization at 1 or 2 yrs

– Previous ED treatment

– Baseline IIEF-5

– Surgical approach

– Surgical type

– Curvature correction procedure

– AMS 700 reservoir placement

Page 14: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Overall Utilization (All)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1 year 2 years

89.2% 88.4%

Page 15: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Conclusion

• PP utilization is high

– 89.2% at one year

– 88.4% at two years

Page 16: Penile Prosthesis Utilization at One and Two Years: Results of the

Questions?