Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Penggunaan Aplikasi “Carbon Calculator Low Carbon Cities Framework (LCCF)”
SGGSD2020 - Seminar Sepang Ke Arah Pembangunan Mampan & Pertumbuhan Hijau 2020
Cyberview Resort & Spa
26 Nov 2013
Outline of LCCF
1. Overview 2. Application 3. Evaluation 4. Data Collection 5. Case Studies 6. Summaries
LCCF Overview
WHAT IS LOW CARBON CITIES? 2
4
Low Carbon Cities can be defined as a city that comprises of societies that consume sustainable green technology, green practices and emit relatively low carbon or GHG as compared with present day practice to avoid the adverse impacts on climate change.
A Low Carbon City (LCC) uses green technologies and sustainable method in the development and operation of the city.
They meet the diverse needs of existing and future residents, are
sensitive to their environment, and contribute to a high quality of life
They are safe and inclusive, well planned, built and managed, and offer equality in opportunity and good urban services for all
2
5
Its planning and implementation must involved all key stakeholders.
6
What is Low Carbon Cities Framework (LCCF)? The Low Carbon Cities Framework & Assessment System is a national framework and assessment system developed by KeTTHA to guide and assist our stakeholders such as developers, local councils, town planners, non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) and the public to lower the levels of carbon emission in our cities towards achieving sustainable urban developments.
Why we need Low Carbon Cities? To support the government policy in reducing 40% of carbon emission per GDP per capita by the year 2020.
When it starts? Since Year 2010 after the launching of National Green Technology Policy & Budget Speech 2010
Who is involves? KeTTHA and MGTC act as the project owner and manager respectively. Representatives from MIP and carbon experts consultants develop the LCCF framework and carbon calculator.
Where to implement? Malaysian municipal council, universities, developers and communities How to Implement? By formulating baseline studies via data collection, stakeholders consultation and action plan or roadmap by each applicants. Implementation started after the roadmap has been completed of which final certificate shall be given after 1 or 2 year(s) period has lapsed.
MALAYSIA. Where are we?
Mt. of CO2 emissions (per capita) in 2008
Source: International Energy Statistic
Which far exceeds the average Asia Pacific CO2 balance of:
2.6 Mt. of CO2 emissions (per capita)
Source: Malaysian Statistic & International Energy Statistic
Source: World Resource Institute
7.1
“It is my dream that one day we can live in a clean, healthy and high quality environment, where cities, townships and communities are built on the fundamentals of Green Technology” YAB Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Razak
MALAYSIA’s COMMITMENT
“…Malaysia is adopting an indicator of a voluntary reduction of up to 40% in terms of emissions intensity of GDP by the year 2020 compared to 2005 levels.” YAB Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Razak
Emission Reduction Target
(ERT)
40 % reduction of carbon
intensity per GDP per capita by
2020
CITIES AND GHG EMISSION
Building sector represents 40% of the world’s energy consumption and contributes to one-third of GHG emissions.
Energy Consumption
If you want to tackle Climate Change – Tackle the Cities More than 50% of world’s population Consumes for 75% of world’s energy consumption Responsible for 80% of GHG emission
“CO2 is the most important anthropogenic of GHG and the main sources of atmospheric CO2 is from burning of fossil fuels – 75% of increase in atmospheric CO2 since industrial times (Source: Cities and Climate Change – Global Report on Human Settlements 2011, UN-Habitat).
Cities/Urban Areas Emit GHG :Sources of Green House Gas
THE LOW CARBON CITIES FRAMEWORK
• To encourage & promote the concept of low carbon cities and townships in Malaysia.
• To increase the compatibility of cities/townships with their local natural system.
• To guide cities in making choice/decisions towards greener solutions.
Objective of Low Carbon Cities
Framework (LCCF)
• All Cities & Townships in Malaysia Users
• To reduce carbon emission intensity by 40% per GDP per capita by the year of 2020
Targets
Local authorities, township developers, planners, consultants and individuals ~ in assessing whether developments carried out within the city contributes towards the reduction or decrease in GHG
POLICIES AND COMMITMENTS
FOR CO2 REDUCTION OF
40%
STRATEGIES KEY TARGETS BY
SECTORS PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS NATIONAL ASSESSMENT
TOOLS & GUIDELINE
RATING/ DESIGN TOOLS BY RELATED INDUSTRIES
GREEN BUILDING INDEX BREEAM (UK)
LEEDS (US & CANADA) GREENMARK (SINGAPORE) GEENSTAR (AUSTRALIA)
1 From Policy to Implementation
40 % reduction of carbon emission per GDP per capita
by 2020
CITIES & TOWNSHIP : GREEN TECH MALAYSIA / FEDERAL DEPT TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING DEPT/ LOCAL GOVT /DEVELOPERS/ KEY STAKEHOLDERS
BUILDINGS : GOVERNMENT AGENCIES & INDUSTRY PLAYERS
POLICY : GOVERNMENT MALAYSIA - KeTTHA / KKR / NRE / Other Ministries
Sustainable Framework for Low Carbon Cities
SUSTAINABLE FRAMEWORK
ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
GREEN RATING TOOLS
ASPECTS
URBAN ENVIRONMENT BUILDING URBAN
INFRASTRUCTURE URBAN
TRANSPORTATION
Governance
Economy Services Transport & Mobility
Natural & Built Environment
LOW CARBON CITY
Community Well Being
Equality & Diversity
GHG INDEX
LIVABILITY INDEX
MISSION (40% GHG REDUCTION)
PERFORMANCE BASED STANDARD
TARGET
ROADMAP
Nat
iona
l A
sses
smen
t Too
ls
National Policy
Rating Tools
KEY ELEMENTS
GREEN NEIGHBOURHOO
D GUIDELINES
GAP/ STATUS
Element of lifecycle costs
Urban Environment
Urban Transportation
Urban Infrastructure Buildings
4 Elements for GHG Reductions in Cities and Townships
Elements Contribute to GHG emission
13 Performance Criteria*
35 Sub Criteria
*Performance Criteria are measurable strategies to reduce carbon emission through:- Policy control, technological dev., better process & product management, change in procurement system, carbon capture, consumption strategies & others.
• Shift of Transport Mode
• Green Transport Infrastructure
• Green Vehicles • Traffic Management
• Site Selection • Urban Form • Urban Greenery & Air
Quality
• Infrastructure Provision
• Waste • Energy • Water
• Low Carbon Building
• Community Service
Performance Criteria for LCCF
Performance Criteria for Urban Environment
ELEMENT 1: URBAN
ENVIRONMENT
UE 1 : SITE SELECTION
UE 2 : URBAN FORM
UE 3 : URBAN GREENERY & ENV. QUALITY
3 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
14 SUB CRITERIA
UE 1 : Site Selection
UE 2 : Urban Form
UE 3 : Urban Greenery And Environmental Quality
1-1: Development within defined urban footprint 1-2: Infill development within existing urban footprint 1-3: Development within transit nodes and corridor 1-4: Brownfield and Grey field redevelopment 1-5: Hilly slope development
2-1: Mixed-use development 2-2: Compact development 2-3: Road and parking 2-4: Comprehensive pedestrian network 2-5: Comprehensive cycling network 2-6: Urban Heat Island (UHI) effects
3-1: Preserve natural ecology, water body and bio-diversity 3-2: Green open space 3-3: Number of trees
Performance Criteria For Urban Transportation
UT 2 : Green Transport Infrastructure
UT 1 : Shift of Transport Mode
UT 4 : Traffic Management
UT 3 : Clean Vehicles
1-1: Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) dependency
2-1: Public transportation 2-2: Walking and cycling
3-1: Low carbon public transportation 3-2: Low carbon private transportation
4-1: Vehicle speed management 4-2: Traffic Congestion and traffic flows management
ELEMENT 2: URBAN
TRANSPORTATION UT 1 : SHIFT OF TRANSPORT MODE UT 2 : GREEN TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE UT 3 : CLEAN VEHICLES
UT 4 : TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
4 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
7 SUB CRITERIA
Performance Criteria For Urban Infrastructure
1-1: Land take for infrastructure and utility services 1-2: Earthworks management 1-3: Urban storm water management and flood mitigation
UI 2 : Waste
UI 3 : Energy
UI 4 : Water Management
UI 1 : Infrastructure Provision
2-1: Construction and industrial waste management 2-2: Household solid waste management
3-1: Energy optimization 3-2: Renewable Energy 3-3: Site wide district cooling system
4-1: Efficient Water Management
ELEMENT 3: URBAN
INFRASTRUCTURE
UI 1 : INFRASTRUCTURE PROVISION
UI 2 : WASTE
UI 3 : ENERGY
UI 4 : WATER MANAGEMENT
4 PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
9 SUB CRITERIA
Performance Criteria For Building
1-1: Operational energy emissions 1-2: Operational water consumption 1-3: Emission abatement through retrofitting 1-4: Building orientation 2-1: Shared facilities and utilities within building
B1 : Low Carbon Buildings
B2 : Community Building
ELEMENT 4: BUILDING
B 1 : LOW CARBON BUILDINGS
B 2 : COMMUNITY BUILDING
2 PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA
5 SUB CRITERIA
LCCF Application
ASSESSMENT APPROACH TO ENCOURAGE IMPLEMENTATION
A O
ne S
yste
m A
ppro
ach •Enables users to
realize benefits of integration by planning, designing and managing the whole urban system
•E.G.: Yokohama waste reduction programme (estimated total waste reduction for fiscal years 2001-2007 is 623,000 tons which leads to reduction of 840,000 tons of CO2 A
Cit
y B
ased
App
roac
h •Enables users to lead a development process that consider their specific circumstances including ecology
•E.G.: Stockholm (an old inner city industrial area transform into an attractive and ecologically sustainable district through an integrated and collaborative planning and management)
A One System Approach
A City Based Approach
User can opt to undertake a One-System Approach or a City-based
Approach depending on their objective and capacity.
METHODOLOGY AND
APPROACHES
STEP 1 Identify Key Stakeholders STEP 2
Identify Roles and
Responsibilities of
Stakeholders
STEP 3 Develop Project
Strategy STEP 4
Data Collection and
Evaluation
STEP 5 Baseline and
Projected Carbon
Emission
STEP 6 Reporting
Methodology & Approaches
•Urban Environment •Urban Transportation •Urban Infrastructure •Building
(Source: Low Carbon Cities Framework and Assessment System)
Sustainable development l Low Carbon Cities Framework KeTTHA & MGTC, low carbon cities framework
And assessment system
A Roadmap Template – Initiative Towards A Low Carbon City
No TASKS PP SP 1 Initial Discussion the relevant authority √ √
2 Signing of MOU √ √
3 Establishing a Task Force comprising both counterparts: - determine TOR - kick off meeting
√ √
4 LCCF Training (Advance) √ √
5
Determine Criteria, approach and boundary - Determine the suitability of the criteria and sub-
criteria - Determine approach (city based OR one system) - Determine boundary
LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH
ADVICE FROM LCC
6 Site Visit of the intended area √ √
7 Project brief preparation - Mission statement, project roadmap & Etc
LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH
ADVICE FROM LCC 8 Technical guidance √ √
9
Data management - Data collection - Establishing baseline - Reporting of findings of the baseline
LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH
ADVICE FROM LCC
10 Awarding Provisional Certification (after endorsement by working committee)
√ √
STEPS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE LCCF
No TASKS PP SP
11
First Draft Report Detail LCCF assessment report Detail LCCF assessment analysis spread sheet Copy of any relevant materials Applications, assessments and certification procedures / process for LCCF
Profiling Carbon Scenario (Existing, BaU 2020, LCS 2020) Performance Criteria and Measurements (Strategizing) Identify projects and initiatives towards low carbon (by sector - UE, UT, UI, B) Reporting of the low carbon status and improvement (on-going : quarterly/yearly after submission)
LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
12 Committee evaluation √ √
13 Final Draft Report (submission) LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
14 Final Report & Presentation LCC INTERVENTION SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
15 Preparation of Roadmap (by user) SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
16 Implementation (by user) SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
17 Progress Report (by user) SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
SELF CONDUCT WITH ADVICE FROM LCC
18 LCCF Certification & Diamond Rating √ √
STEPS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE LCCF
LCCF Evaluation
LCCF Calculator
Landuse
Biodiversity &
Landscape
Embodied
Energy Water
Waste
Transport
Urban Environment
Urban Transport
Urban Infrastructure Building
Electricity, diesel, petrol, natural gas
Water usage, landscape irrigation
Building footprint m2
Surface area, nos of trees, type of trees, covered area with trees
Framework Elements
Waste generated
Corridor, Cordon, Network approach
LCC Framework Elements
Urban Environment
Urban Transport
Urban Infrastructure Building
• Shift of Transport Mode
• Green Transport Infrastructure
• Green Vehicles • Traffic
Management
• Site Selection • Urban Form • Urban Greenery
& Air Quality
• Infrastructure Provision
• Waste • Energy • Water
• Low Carbon Building
• Community Service
LOW CARBON CITIES FRAMEWORK & ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (LCCF)
LCCF CARBON TRACKING - INVID Pre-Release
DATA UPDATE: 8-Nov-13 DATA COMPILER: Fendi
Organisational Information
1
2
3
4
5 Type of Organisationa. Consultantb. Developerc. Local Authorityd. Universitye. Others (Please Specify)
6a. Nameb. Designationc. Emaild. Contact No.e. Team Members with responsible criteria
7
Based on LCCF Calculator Version: LCCF Final 26 Mac 2013This is MGTC-derived calculator variant - INVID pre-release, V1F
Pn Suraya
Boundary Location
State
Name of City/ Development/ Complex/ Region/ Organisation
Name of Project Partner Focal Taskforce
Malacca
Hang Tuah Jaya
HTJ LCCF
HTJ LCCF
Baseline YearProjected Year (BAU and LCS)
Period20122013
Person-in-charge (Project Partner) :
Project [email protected]
Type B
Type A
Type C
Type D
Type E
The Calculator Interface
LCCF Calculator MS Excel version
RESULTS
Calculator Criteria Element 2012 Baseline 2013 Project (P) Reduction (B-P)
tCO2/yr tCO2/yr tCO2/yr %2012 2013
LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE - C Storage in Soil 22.84 22.84 0.00 0.00 Data collection in progress
LANDSCAPE - C Sequestration by Vegetation -37,575,428.95 -37,575,428.95 0.00 0.00 Data collection in progress
LANDSCAPE - C Seq. by Trees (not within Open Space) -30,000.00 -30,000.00 0.00 0.00 Data collection in progress
LANDUSE LANDUSE - C Storage in Soil (losses) -584,844.13 -584,844.13 0.00 0.00 Indirect value from LANDSCAPE
LANDUSE - C Sequestration by Vegetation (losses) 1,237,056.84 1,237,056.84 0.00 0.00 Indirect value from LANDSCAPE
EMBODIED CARBON IN CONSTRUCTION Building Construction 5,304.91 5,303.15 1.75 0.03 Infrastructure Construction 248.21 248.21 0.00 0.00
OPERATIONAL CARBON Energy 17,668.34 15,203.90 2,464.44 13.95 Water 139.25 123.16 16.10 11.56 Waste 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Assume increase of population
TOTAL EMISSIONS -36,929,832.70 -36,932,314.99 2,482.29 25.54 Best Practise 2 (BP2)
Based on LCCF Calculator Version: LCCF Final 26 Mac 2013
This is MGTC-derived calculator variant - INVID pre-release, V1F
Percentage Reduction Achieved
(B-P)/BRemarks
TOTAL CARBON EMISSIONS
LOW CARBON CITIES FRAMEWORK & ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (LCCF)
LCCF CARBON TRACKING - INVID Pre-Release
Input Navigation Calculator Engine Framework Criteria Relation
0 Input Database
1 Input Landuse Option 2 Selected Biod Landuse Landscape Calc, V1
2 Input Biodiversity and Landscape
3 Input Embodied Embodied Calc, V1
4 Input Energy Option 1 Selected Energy Calc, V1
5 Input Water Option 1 Selected Water Calc, V1
6 Input Waste Option 1 Selected Waste Calc, V1
7 Input Transport In Progress
8 Summary of ResultsLanduse 0.00 % indirect data from landscapeLandscape 0.00 % In ProgressEmbodied Carbon In Construction 0.03 % In ProgressOperational Carbon 25.51 % In ProgressTOTAL CARBON EMMISION 25.54 % Best Practise 2 (BP2)
BASELINE CO2 Emmission Value -36,929,833 tCO2/yearBAU CO2 Emmission Value -36,932,315 tCO2/yearLCS CO2 Emmission Value To be defined in the Baseline Study Report
Based on LCCF Calculator Version: LCCF Final 26 Mac 2013This is MGTC-derived calculator variant - INVID pre-release, V1F
UE 2-3, 3-2, 3-3
NA
NA
NA
B 1-1, 1-2
NA
LCCF Calculator MS Excel version
SUMMARY SHEET
Element Criteria Sub Criteria Summary – Total Carbon Emissions (tCO2/yr)
% reduction
Urb
an
Envi
ronm
ent
UE 1: Urban Footprint
UE 1-1 Prioritize development within defined urban footprint
A B C X
UE 1-2 Encourage sustainable development intensities
Y
Urb
an
Tran
spor
tatio
n UT 1: Shift of Transport Mode UT 1-1 Reduce Single Occupancy
Vehicle (SOV) traveling Z
UT 2: Green Transport Infrastructure
UT 2-1 Increase utilization of public transportation
XX
Urb
an
Infr
astr
uctu
re
UI 1: Infrastructure Provision
UI 1-1 Reduction of land area for infrastructure and utility services
yy
UI 1-2 Implement site wide district cooling system
zz
Build
ing
B 1: Low Carbon Buildings B 1-1 Increase number of buildings
with low carbon footprint XY
TOTAL tCO2e 15 %
EXAMPLE SUMMARY SHEET - Achievement Level Based On Application Of Weightage System
ABSOLUTE CO2 REDUCTION
BP 2
Carbon Reduction
Level Level of Achievement
100% Carbon Neutral
70-99% Best Practice 5 (BP5)
50-69% Best Practice 4 (BP4)
30-49% Best Practice 3 (BP3)
10-29% Best Practice 2 (BP2)
1-9% Best Practice 1 (BP1)
INDIVIDUAL SUB CRITERIA
CALCULATOR
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND SUB CRITERIA
SUMMARY SHEET
Achievement/ Recognition
Assessment and Low Carbon Performance LCC Evaluation
UE
UT
UI
B
1.Sum of reduced emissions
2.Reduction Percentage
UE 1-1 to UE 3-3
UT 1-1 to UT 4-2
UI 1-1 to UI 4-1
B 1-1 to B 2-1
LCCF Data Collection
Introduction
Building Consumption Input System (BCIS) is an online input database system for the purpose of data collection and monitoring the energy and water consumption of buildings.
This system is developed and administered by GreenTech Malaysia on behalf of the Government of Malaysia (KeTTHA).
The participating users can access the system by online and obtain consumption performance analysis of their buildings.
Objectives
Monitoring of the performance of buildings in the 10% Savings of Energy & Water in Government Buildings in Putrajaya. This programme is one of the main programme under the Green Cities Project of Putrajaya & Cyberjaya.
Act as the main data collection tool for Energy & Water segment of the Low Carbon Cities Framework (LCCF) and also development of Common Carbon Metric (CCM) for buildings in Putrajaya. Other cities CCM shall be developed as well.
Example of Data Reporting
5
USERs Need to PROVIDE all these five (5) information during the duration of the project assessment
DATA COLLECTION | Energy & Water
i) Residential ii) Commercial iii) Others
Monthly Electrical Energy/ Tenaga Elektrik
Bulanan (kwh)
Electrical Maximum Demand/ Kehendak
Maksimum elektrik (kw)
Energy Chilled Water GDC (RTH)
Maximum Demand GDC (RT/month)
Water Consumption, m3
Main Portal
www.greentownship.my
i) Native Garden /indigenous garden ii) Green Roof*2 iii) Crop Farming iv) Tur fs v) Existing Natural Grassland vi) Rehabilitation/ Constructed Wetland/ Riparian
Buffer Strip*2 vii) Existing Wetland/ Riparian Habitat viii) River/ streams/ waterfalls/lakes ix) Native Plantation Forest x) Non-Native Plantation Forest xi) Regenerated Native Habitat <5 years old*2 xii) Regenerated Native Habitat 5 - 10 years old*2 xiii) Indigenous Native Habitat > 10 years old*1 xiv) Indigenous Native Habitat > 20 years old*1
5
Surface Area, (ha)
Area Previously covered by Trees (ha)
Number of Trees
USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected
DATA COLLECTION | Urban Environment
Type of Trees
Landscape
Landuse
5
Surface Area, (ha)
Area Previously covered by Trees (ha)
Number of Trees
USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected
DATA COLLECTION | Urban Environment
i) Government ii) Residential iii) Commercial iv) Mixed-Use v) Service Industry vi) Public Amenity vii) Infrastructure & Utility viii) Road ix) Open Space
Embodied Carbon
5
Building Footprint,
(m2)
USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected
DATA COLLECTION | Building
i) Offices ii) Residential iii) Hospital iv) Hotel v) Education vi) Commercial vii) Utilities viii) Sports & Leisure Facilities ix) Mixed Use Blocks x) Emergency Services & Security xi) Community Centres & Services xii) Other Special Structures xiii) Other Infrastructures
ENERGY
5
Electricity Consumption,
(kWh)
USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected
DATA COLLECTION | Urban Infra & Building
i) Offices ii) Residential iii) Hospital iv) Hotel v) Education vi) Commercial vii) Utilities viii) Sports & Leisure Facilities ix) Mixed Use Blocks x) Emergency Services & Security xi) Community Centres & Services xii) Other Special Structures xiii) Other Infrastructures
Data from
5
USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected
DATA COLLECTION | Urban Infra & Building
i) Offices ii) Residential iii) Hospital iv) Hotel v) Education vi) Commercial vii) Utilities viii) Sports & Leisure Facilities ix) Mixed Use Blocks x) Emergency Services & Security xi) Community Centres & Services xii) Other Special Structures xiii) Other Infrastructures
Water Consumption,
(m3)
Data from
WATER
WASTE
5
Weight of Waste Diverted;recycled/ Disposed;landfilled
(tonnes)
USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected
DATA COLLECTION | Urban Infra
i) Batteries (Post Consumer Non-Automotive) ii) Glass iii) Mixed commercial and industrial waste iv) Mixed municipal waste v) Organic Waste: Garden Waste vi) Paper and board vii) Plasterboard viii) Plastics: Average plastics ix) Silt / Soil x) Wood xi) Mixed Paper (general) xii) Mixed Paper (primarily residential) xiii) Mixed Paper (primarily from offices) xiv) Mixed Metals xv) Mixed Plastics xvi) Etc …
Distance from site to disposal destination (km)
TRANSPORT
Corridor Approach - Emission calculation for a stretch of one road section or a combination of many road sections
Cordon Approach - Emission calculation for a defined road network
Network Approach - A traffic model is developed for the area
5
Selected parameters under Traffic Survey. Eg
amount of vehicles according to types
entering and exiting the section line , junction etc
USERs Need to PROVIDE any of these information during the duration of the project assessment if this Criteria selected
DATA COLLECTION | Urban Transport
LCCF Case Studies
LCCF Pilot Project Objectives To “test-bed” the LCCF at various localities with different
setting and developmental needs; To obtain a baseline of carbon emissions by using the
LCCF; To apply the carbon calculator at various settings and
localities; To understand different needs and requirements that
would lead to enhancing the LCCF further; To identify strategies and recommendations based on the
Framework; and To reassess the carbon emissions levels to show
reduction or abatement in carbon emissions.
Pilot Partners
NO
PILOT PARTNER
COLLABORATION
APPROACH
STATUS SELECTED CRITERIA TIMELINE
1 MAJLIS BANDARAYA MIRI,SARAWAK
Curtin University, Sarawak
One System
Approach
• Project Brief completed
• Stakeholder Basic training and workshop has been conducted
• Verifying data.
2 Performance Criteria: UE 3-2: Green Space UE 3-3: Number of Trees UI 2-1: Household Solid Waste Management
2014
2 MAJLIS PERBANDARAN HANG TUAH JAYA,MELAKA
One System
Approach
• Project Brief completed
• Baseline data has been collected
• Analysing data
3 Performance Criteria: (UE 2-3) Road And Parking (UE 3-2) Green Open Space (UE 3-3) Number Of Trees (B 1-1) Operational Energy Emissions (B 1-2) Operational Water Emissions
2014
3 UNIVERSITI MALAYA
City Based
Approach
• Project Brief completed
• LCCF Basic & Advanced Training has been conducted
• Data collection in progress (80%)
13 Performance Criteria 35 sub-criteria
2014
4 UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
City Based
Approach
• Project Brief completed
• Finished LCCF Basic Training for UTM’s Stakeholder
• Data collection in progress
10 Performance Criteria UE 1: Site Selection UE 2: Urban Form UE 3: Urban Greenery and Environmental Quality UT 1: Shift of Transport Mode UT 2: Green Transport Infrastructure UI 1: Infrastructure Provision
2014
IMPLEMENTATION STATUS
LCCF CASE STUDIES #1
Federal Government Resort Kenyir Lake, Terengganu
• To study the current inventory of activities of the Kenyir RPP resort and the potential impact where LCCF assessment is applied;
• To determine the carbon emission baseline of the development.
• RPP Tasik Kenyir is an island resort located on Pulau Sah Besar sitting amongst 340 islands within Lake Kenyir. It is a 7- hectare development of more than 20 years old owned by the Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia. The island is the tip of a highland not submerged during the construction of the dam.
• The LCCF pilot project on RPP Tasik Kenyir was aimed at testing the applicability of LCCF to a resort development.
• The carbon assessment evaluation based on a City Based Approach.
• Baseline Study Document completed PRO
JEC
T B
RIE
F
11 Applicable Criterias
Short Term Action Plan
Hill Slope Development: Undertake slope maintenance measure
Household Waste Management: Separate waste generated either to be recycled or
composted
Energy Optimization: Street lights fitted with light sensor switches and use energy efficient
bulbs. AC use hydrocarbon gas with zero ODP, & very low GWP
Efficient Water Management: Implement rain water harvesting (gravity based flow) and use of
low flow tap & shower Buildings: metering water and energy
consumption and use of energy efficient lighting & appliances
Long Term Action Plan
Green Space: Tree planting with high rates of carbon absorption
Low Carbon Public Transport: Converting petrol engines to bio-diesel
engines
Low Carbon Private Transport: Replacing the petrol motorcycles with
electric bikes
Renewable Energy: Solar farm to cater all electrical energy requirement
Total Carbon Emissions (provisional) Baseline: 95.39 tCO2/year
Projected: 62.35 tCO2/year
Reduction (Baseline – Projected): 95.39 – 62.35
= 33.04 tCO2/year
Percentage of Reduction : 34.64%
Total Carbon Emissions (provisional)
The current baseline for existing site is 95.39tCO2/year with a potential carbon reduction of 62.35tCO2/year if trees are replanted as proposed i.e a reduction of 34.64%. This equates to LCCF 3 diamond rating (prediction only and subject to actual implementation). If solar power is use this will further cut down emissions from fossil fuel to generate a higher LCCF rating.
LCCF CASE STUDIES #2
Cyberjaya, Selangor DE
Total Land Area : 28.16km² (6,960.65 ac) Green Area : 634.34 ac (9.11%) Population 2010 : 47,961 Population Density : 1,703/km² (6.8people/ac)
The objectives of the Baseline Study research for Cyberjaya are:
i. To identify the sub-criteria (based on LCCF) which are applicable for Cyberjaya;
ii. To identify the carbon emission baseline of Cyberjaya for 2011;
iii. To forecast the carbon emission level for 2020 based on Business-as-Usual (BaU) model and Low Carbon Strategies (LCS); and
iv. To recommend low carbon strategies that may help in reducing carbon emission level of Cyberjaya.
12 Applicable Criterias
Cyberjaya, Selangor DE
Cyberjaya, Selangor DE
Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for UE
1 Hill slope development – replanting trees with high carbon sequestration vegetation
2 Road and parking should not exceed 20% of total area of development in Cyberjaya. In this case the roads and parking area are less than 20% as allocated by the Cyberjaya Master Plan
3 Green open space is minimum at 10% of the total development or greater
4 Water bodies are conserved for carbon sequestration
5 Indigenous trees of high carbon sequestration including bamboos are planted
6 Expansion of greeneries through green roofs and grid paving etc.
Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for UT
1 Awareness campaigns of the carbon impact of transport as a result of usage of SOV
2 Incentives for the reductions of SOV
3 Penalties due to the usage of SOV
RECOMMENDATIONS for Cyberjaya
Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for UI
1 Promote awareness campaigns to achieve zero waste to landfills
2 Generate energy out of organic (green) waste
3 Ensure all buildings use DCS cooling
Low Carbon Strategies 2020 for Building
1
Design energy efficiency measures conforming to benchmarks and common carbon metrics to provide trajectories to 40% carbon reduction in 2020 and beyond
2 Build retrofits for existing buildings to meet energy efficiency benchmarks and climate goal trajectories
3 Design buildings conforming to the Common Carbon Metrics (CCM) for carbon reduction in 2020 and beyond
4 Use of renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions
5 Conserve water and therefore resulting in energy savings in water processing and distribution.
RECOMMENDATIONS for Cyberjaya
Total Carbon Emissions (provisional)
Baseline (2011) : 1,401,350 tCO2/year
Projected (*LCS 2020) : 1,109,205 tCO2/year
Reduction (Baseline – Projected): 1,401,350 – 1,109,205
= 292,145 tCO2/year
Percentage of Reduction : 21%
Projected (*BaU 2020) : 3,200,909 tCO2/year (increase of 128% CO2 emmission)
*LCS : Low Carbon Strategies , *BAU : Business As Usual
RECOMMENDATIONS for Cyberjaya
Overall Summary by Elements
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
UE UT UI B TOTAL
Baseline 2011
BaU 2020
LCS 2020
LCCF Element :: UE – Urban Environment, UT – Urban Transport, UI – Urban Infrastructure, B - Building
UE (tCO2) UT (tCO2) UI (tCO2) B (tCO2) TOTAL (tCO2)
Baseline 2011 883,620 246,682 57,687 213,361 1,401,350
BaU 2020 2,446,662 379,890 143,416 230,942 3,200,909
LCS 2020 630,771 278,585 54,407 145,442 1,109,205
Total Carbon Emissions (provisional)
The current baseline for existing site is 1,401,350 tCO2/year with a potential carbon reduction of 1,109,205 tCO2/year if Low Carbon Strategies initiated as proposed i.e a reduction of 21%. This equates to LCCF 2 diamond rating (prediction only and subject to actual implementation).
LCCF CASE STUDIES #3
Hang Tuah Jaya, Malacca
• To study the current inventory of activities of the Hang Tuah Jaya (HTJ) municipality and the potential impact where LCCF assessment is applied;
• To determine the carbon emission baseline of the development.
• HTJ municipality has an area of f 35,733 acre and is located in the middle of Malacca state. HTJ municipality has a population of about 114,732 people or consist of 19 percent of total 602,867 population of Malacca.
• The LCCF pilot project on HTJ municipality was aimed at testing the applicability of LCCF to an existing city development.
• The carbon assessment evaluation based on a System Based Approach.
• Project Brief completed. PRO
JEC
T B
RIE
F
5 Applicable Criterias
Hang Tuah Jaya, LCCF Designated Area
KAWASAN KAJIAN 1. Taman Botanikal
2. Taman Tema Air Wonderland
Melaka
3. Taman Tasik Utama
4. MITC
5. Dusun Dato Murad
6. Kota Cemerlang
7. Kompleks KDN
8. Taman Seribu Bunga
9. Seri Negeri
10. Seri Bendahara
11. Dataran Sejarah
12. Ayer Keroh Country Club
(AKCC)
13. Tasik Ayer Keroh
14. Zoo Melaka
15. Taman Mini Malaysia
2
1
3
6
5
4
9 8
7
10
13
12
11
15
14
Keluasan: 1,956.57 ekar
Short Term Strategies
Menjalankan program penjimatan penggunaan tenaga dan air sebanyak 10% penjimatan (tanpa
kos)
Melaraskan suhu persekitaran dari penghawa dingin di setiap bangunan yang terlibat ke 24°C
Melaksanakan Sistem Pengumpulan Air Hujan (SPAH) untuk kegunaan lanskap, tandas dan
pembersihan am
Penggunaan cahaya siang semulajadi di dalam bangunan (kurang menggunakan lampu
elektrik)
Long Term Strategies
Penanaman pokok yang mempunyai kadar penyerapan karbon yang tinggi . Ch. Buluh
tempatan, dan Eucalyptus
Penggunaan tenaga yang boleh diperbaharui iaitu Solar Fotovoltaik
Penggunaan peralatan cekap tenaga di setiap bangunan (Lampu LED/ T5, komputer riba,
inverter aircond)
Mempunyai ruang terbuka hijau minimum 10% atau lebih daripada jumlah pembangunan
Total Carbon Emissions (provisional)
This is work in progress and carbon reduction target is set at 10% for the year 2014 which equates to LCCF 2 Diamond rating (prediction only and subject to actual implementation).
Summaries
LCCF : Improvement Actions Improve Data Collection - is always the problem in starting up
LCCF for any application since it is a PERFORMANCE BASED system and based on actual measurement data. Thus, a continuous data collection is needed to ensure that in
future, the monitoring and reporting that are related to carbon emission is comprehensive and the findings are robust.
Setting up Low Carbon City Committee in each applied zones/areas to ensure the low carbon initiatives are being followed through and implemented consistently. The committee shall also be responsible to: Monitor data collection related to low carbon initiatives; Promote stakeholders in applying and implementing the low
carbon strategies; and Lead the committee in developing their own Low Carbon City
Roadmap/ Action Plan.
LCCF : Issues & Challenges Issues
Low acceptance or understanding by other PBTs, University campus and developers on the Low Carbon Cities Concept
Short of expertise in the low carbon cities concept
Data Collection & Sharing of Data Lack of fiscal incentives during
earlier time of implementation Lack of man-power and financial
resources Lack of buy-in from senior
management of municipalities
Challenges
To increase acceptance and awareness of the stakeholders
To ensure successful implementation of the current pilot projects and strategic partners which act as an example for future projects.
To position MGTC as the Low Carbon City One Stop Centre for the country
To create mechanism to bring LCCF into the mainstream of current development mechanism
Notes on LCCF
LCCF is not to compare with other cities but to compare own self (Baseline/current) with Business As Usual (BAU) and Low Carbon Strategies (LCS) of their own respective city
To guide, gauge and monitor how much reduction in carbon emission can be achieved by using Low Carbon Strategies (LCS) defined by each cities.
MALAYSIAN GREEN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (462237-T)
No. 2, Jalan 9/10, Persiaran Usahawan, Seksyen 9, 43650 Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor.
Tel: 603 – 8921 0800 Fax: 603 – 8921 0801 Website: www.greentechmalaysia.my
MINISTRY OF ENERGY, GREEN TECHNOLOGY AND WATER
Block E4/5, Goverment Complex Parcel E, Presint 1 Federal Government Administrative Centre, 62668
Putrajaya Tel: 603 – 8883 6000 Fax: 603 – 8889 3930
Website: www.kettha.gov.my
THANK YOU