Pen Gala Man Terry Mart

8/2/2019 Pen Gala Man Terry Mart

1/17

PENGALAMAN PUBLIKASI DI JURNAL

INTERNASIONAL

Terry Mart

Departemen Fisika FMIPAUniversitas Indonesia

Depok 16424, Indonesia

DRPM UI 2008

Terry Mart (Universitas Indonesia) Publikasi Internasional DRPM UI 2008 1 / 17
http://find/http://goback/


2/17

Motivasi

1 Berbagi Pengalaman

2 Tidak Mengajari

3 Setiap orang memiliki jalan sendiri

http://find/


3/17

Makalah Sekedar Laporan?

1 Benar!

2 Asumsi: Metoda riset yang digunakan sudah benar, memenuhi

kaidah/standar yang biasa digunakan oleh ilmuwan di dalamkomunitas tersebut.

3 Yang pertama dilihat referee adalah temuan dan metode untuk

mendapatkan temuan tersebut!

4 Namun cara menulis juga penting, karena jika salah bisa fatal.

http://find/


4/17

Umumnya, seberkas makalah memiliki:

1 Judul

2 Abstrak (Ikhtisar)

3 Pendahuluan (Mengapa penulis mengerjakan ini?)

4 Material dan Metode (Apa yang dilakukan penulis?)5 Hasil (Apa yang ditemukan penulis?)

6 Diskusi (Apa artinya penemuan tersebut?)

7 Kesimpulan

8 Ucapan Terimakasih (Acknowledgments)9 Daftar Acuan

http://find/


5/17

Judul, Nama Penulis, dan Institusi

The Titleis the first thing a reader will see of our paper. Therefore, the writing

of the title deserves special care. It should convey the greatest amount of

information in the smallest number of words.

Pengalaman Penulis: Tidak pernah menjadi masalah. Judul bisa

menarik. Contoh:

G.T. Horowitz and E. Silverstein, The Inside story: Quasilocal tachyons

and black holes, Phys.Rev.D73:064016,2006.

A. Adams, J. Polchinski, E. Silverstein, Dont panic! Closed string

tachyons in ALE space-times, JHEP 0110:029,2001.

H. Georgi, Fun with Higgsless theories, Phys.Rev.D71:015016,2005.

http://find/


6/17

Abstrak (Ikhtisar)

Every paper must have an abstract. It should be about 5% of the length of the

article, but less than 500 words. It should state all subjects about which new

information is given and the conclusions and results. For experimental papersit should specify clearly what quantities were measured. It should not contain

footnotes, coined words, or acronyms which are not explained.

Pengalaman Penulis: Jarang menjadi masalah

http://find/


7/17

Pendahuluan (Mengapa penulis mengerjakan ini?)

The purpose of a scientific paper is to communicate new scientific information

among the scientist. Therefore, the first objective is to demonstrate that the

story being told is worth telling and it is the job of the Introductionto do this.

In order to arrive at this objective an Introductionshould also contain a

hypothesis preceded by a series of logical statements which make that

hypothesis a sensible thing to have tested.

Pengalaman Penulis: Sering menjadi masalah!

Contoh



8/17

Contoh problem pada Pendahuluan

The objective of the paper is to calculate the role of the neutron structure onthe binding energy of neutrons.In particular the authors wish to consider therole of the electric form factor that is finite at finite momentum transfers. Usingthe usual method of fourier transforming I believe that there is an effect of the neutron charge form factor but it is notappropriate to dramatize itwhen it is really small and perhaps within thedifficult calculations for the binding energy of the neutron in Deuteron andmuch more so in the case of Be.

In view of these comments I would suggest that the authors consider the

suggestions carefully and modify the paper accordingly. The introduction partof the paper can be compactified considerably.

The papershould not be publishedit its present form.



9/17

Metode (Apa yang dilakukan penulis?)

This section is straightforward. The criterion for a well-written Methods of

Researchsection is that a reasonably knowledgeable colleague could repeat

our investigation (or experiment) after reading the description. This could

become a serious problem since the author is usually very familiar with theresearch technique and, therefore, could leave out important details

unconsciously.

Pengalaman Penulis: Bagian yang paling sering menjadi fokus

pemeriksaan referee. Sering menjadi masalah



10/17

Contoh problem pada Metode

The subject of the study sounds interesting since the author compares the

calculations from the Regge model with the isobar model and finds a strong difference

in absolute cross sections. Prior to further consideration the author should clarifyseveral details of this study:

1 Generally the Regge model is applied at high energies, and at low energies

Regge calculations are comparable with the isobar model. Can the author derive

the low energy limit of the Regge propagator and show whether it converges to

the Feynman propagator; alternatively, what is the difference? There is a strongstatement by A. Donnachie and P.V. Landshoff that Regge theory is applicable at

at

s 5 or 10 GeV (Phys. Lett. B 296, 227 1992). Does this negate theauthors analysis?

2 It is not clearwhether the author used a form factor for the Regge model

calculations. Regge calculations require phenomenological form factors in orderto reproduce the measured t dependence. Please clarify.

3 Why were the first two diagrams not considered in the Regge model and how

does the author motivate that? Nucleon exchange is well treated by the Regge

approach, which is discussed in detail in the series of publications by J.-M.

Laget.



11/17

Hasil (Apa yang ditemukan penulis?)

Results should be reported correctly and honestly but this does not mean that

we have to present all raw data taken in the lab. In fact, a most common

mistake in reporting a scientific investigation is that the results were

presented in the form of a direct transcription from the laboratory notebook.

Instead, use graphs or figures to present the results since they cary moreimpact than tables, especially where continuous changes associated with

continuous inputs are being described. Since graphs are usually less precise,

a proportional combination of graphs and tables is necessary.





12/17

Diskusi (Apa artinya penemuan tersebut?)

The main topic for the Discussionshould be whether or not the hypothesis

mentioned in the Introductionis supported by the results of investigation. All

literature cited in this section must have the function of supporting arguments

about the Results. Some scientific journals allow the authors to combineResultsand Discussionin one section. However, the advantage of separating

Resultsand Discussionis that it preserves the objectivity of the Results.





13/17

Kesimpulan

The Summary, which is usually placed after the Discussion, is the first thing a

reader will normally look at after he/she has been attracted by the title. The

formula for a good summary is: it should expand the title and condense thepaper! A summary for a scientific report should be informative, while for

review articles it should be descriptive.




14/17

Ucapan Terimakasih (Acknowledgments)

Acknowledgments should be a simple statement of thanks for help and may

not be a dedication or memorial. Acknowledgments to people should precede

those of financial support.

Pengalaman Penulis: Tidak pernah menjadi masalah



15/17

Daftar Acuan

Every journal has a rigid format for the citation of references. Unfortunately,

this is not standard among journals and is one of the most frustrating aspectsof writing papers. In general, a reference for a journal article usually consistsof

The name of all authors

Year of publication

The name of journal, written in abbreviated form

Volume number

First page numbers of the article

The complete format for a book reference may have a different form, as wellas for conference proceedings, theses, or scientific reports. Refer to the

NOTATION GUIDE of the TARGET JOURNAL.




16/17

Masalah Bahasa Inggris

Meski tidak esensial, bisa menjadi masalah besar!

Lihat contoh potongan komentar Referee:

In its current form, I am not ready to recommend publication of this paper. I

would like the authors to address the comments that I raised above .Ideally, I would like to see a new . I would also like the authors to add fittinguncertainties to their tabulated resonance parameters. Finally, the authors

should have an expert in English grammar review their paper before it isresubmitted.



17/17

Kesimpulan Presentasi Ini

Please conclude by yourself!


Documents

Pen Gala Man Terry Mart