2
,./ "I t = - ! -, I''': ( THE SECRETARY OF STATE WASHINGTON I ',' \ I ." ~ ". ". ,J ,I , - ' .. ,' August 27, 1980 : (. f1EHORANDUM TO: Lloyd Cutler , FROM: o/d;=t~ .Edmund S ..MUSki~....r .,. SUBJECT: P. D. 59 You have received, from Chris, a chronology prepared by my staff which they believe to be a statement of the Departmentis involvement in the revised Nuclear Targeting Strategy. Reg Bartholomew has reviewed it and concurs in its accuracy.Cy Vance may also be a source of additional information. In terms of my own involvement, I had an initial S.I.O.P. briefing from Harold Brown on May 29. To the best of my recollection there was no suggestion that a new. targeting strategy was involved or that a new Presidential Directive was in the process of development. On August 5, there was a Muskie/Brown/Brzezinski meet- ing at 11:15 a.m.,'which lasted forty-five ~inutes. The only item on the agenda for that meeting wa s ."building a constituency for foreign aid." At th~t ~eeting there was a . . brief conversation between Secretary Brown .and : Dr Brzezinski .', regarding the fact that the press was going to carry a story .."./ on our nuclear targeting strategy. I was' not informed, in V . the context of that conversation, t.h at; a Presidential Directive had been issued on this subject. Secretary Brown did offer to brief me on the targeting strategy when' I.returned front California. : /1 . briefe~n m~o~~a~: D~u§~~t?a' ~~a~~~~s~!~~o:~u~~eif~o Ir1~~~~U:~~d is matter with Harold Brown at breakfast in New York. During the period fdllowingMonday, August 18,1 also had briefings from State Department staff people. I, .=.<. I o;~" :;)).9- : \ Ct. ?JJ()/} \.. .Y1, . - Uth DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL, E.O. 13526, SECTION 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP APPEAL NO. 2011-064, document no. 34 DECLASSIFICATION DATE: December 19, 2013

PD-59 [Memorandum], August 27, 1980 - Archives

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

I t

= - -

I ( THE SECRETARY OF STATE

WASHINGTON

I

I ~

J I -

August 27 1980

(

f1EHORANDUM TO Lloyd Cutler

FROM od=t~Edmund S MUSki~r

SUBJECT P D 59

You have received from Chris a chronology preparedby my staff which they believe to be a statement of the Departmentis involvement in the revised Nuclear Targeting Strategy Reg Bartholomew has reviewed it and concurs in its accuracyCy Vance may also be a source of additional information

In terms of my own involvement I had an initial SIOP briefing from Harold Brown on May 29 To the best of my recollection there was no suggestion that a new targeting strategy was involved or that a new Presidential Directive was in the process of development

On August 5 there was a MuskieBrownBrzezinski meet-ing at 1115 amwhich lasted forty-five ~inutes The only item on the agenda for that meeting wa s building a constituency for foreign aid At th~t ~eeting there was a brief conversation between Secretary Brown and Dr bull Brzezinski regarding the fact that the press was going to carry a story on our nuclear targeting strategy I was not informed in V the context of that conversation that a Presidential Directive had been issued on this subject Secretary Brown did offer to brief me on the targeting strategy when Ireturned front California

1

briefe~n m~o~~a~ D~usect~~ta ~~a~~~~s~~~o~u~~eif~o Ir1~~~~U~~d is matter with Harold Brown at breakfast in New York During

the period fdllowingMonday August 181 also had briefings from State Department staff people

I

=lt

I

o~ ))9-

Ct JJ() Y1 - Uth

DECLASSIFIED UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE INTERAGENCY SECURITY CLASSIFICATION APPEALS PANEL EO 13526 SECTION 53(b)(3)

ISCAP APPEAL NO 2011-064 document no 34 DECLASSIFICATION DATE December 19 2013

j I

2 I

I I i IYou

will note that there is no reference in the State Department summary to any con~ultationwith the Department on a Presidential Directive on this subject To my knowledge the decision to reflect this strategy in a Presidential Directive the text of that directive and the judgment to background the press on that directive was not known in advance to anyone in this Department

Finally I should note that to date no one in this Department has received a copy of the direcEive whichmiddotwas finallyissued~

I

tmiddot

f

II

~ - ~- --- ~

j I

2 I

I I i IYou

will note that there is no reference in the State Department summary to any con~ultationwith the Department on a Presidential Directive on this subject To my knowledge the decision to reflect this strategy in a Presidential Directive the text of that directive and the judgment to background the press on that directive was not known in advance to anyone in this Department

Finally I should note that to date no one in this Department has received a copy of the direcEive whichmiddotwas finallyissued~

I

tmiddot

f

II

~ - ~- --- ~