Upload
devika
View
55
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Particles for Tracking. Simon Maskell 2 December 2002. Contents. Particle filtering (on an intuitive level) Nonlinear non-Gaussian problems Some Demos Tracking in clutter Tracking with constraints Tracking dim targets Mutual triangulation Conclusions. Particle Filter. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Particles for Tracking Simon Maskell2 December 2002
3
Contents
• Particle filtering (on an intuitive level)
– Nonlinear non-Gaussian problems
• Some Demos
– Tracking in clutter
– Tracking with constraints
– Tracking dim targets
– Mutual triangulation
• Conclusions
4
Particle Filter
• Kalman filter is optimal if and only if
– dynamic model is linear Gaussian
– measurement model is linear Gaussian
• Extended Kalman filter (EKF) approximates models
– Ok, if models almost linear Gaussian in locality of target
– Hence large EKF based tracking literature
• Particle filter approximates pdf explicitly as a sample set
– Better, if EKF’s approximation loses lots of information
5
Particle Filter
• Consider
– A nonlinear function
– Two candidate distributions
• Different diversity of hypotheses
• Different part of function
6
Particle Filter
• Look at variation in gradient of tangent across hypotheses
– Determined by diversity of hypotheses and curvature
• Bearings only tracking
– Nonlinearity pronounced since range typically uncertain
7
Particle Filter
• An Extended Kalman Filter infers states from measurements
– Restricts the models to be of a given form
• A particle filter generates a number of hypotheses
– Predicts particles forwards
– Hypotheses appear to use dynamics and measurements
• Importance sampling
– Choice of importance density is VERY VERY important
8
Particle Filter
• Offers the potential to capitalise on models
– Approximating models can lose information
– Lost information can be critical to performance
• Solution structure can mirror problem structure
– Specific examples of potential to improve performance
• May not need to explore a deep history of associations
• Using difficult information
– Doppler Blind Zones / Terrain Masking
– Out-of-sequence measurements
– Stealthy Targets
9
Some Demos
• Tracking in clutter
– Heavy tailed likelihood
• Tracking with constraints
– Obscuration can be informative
• Tracking dim targets
– Correlate images through time
• Mutual triangulation
– Bearing of sensors and sensors’ bearings of target
10
Conclusions
• Particle Filtering can offer significant gains
– Can capitalise on model fidelity
– Can mirror problem structure
• Questions?