16
Introduction to Management Group presentation: By, Vaishali Bhardwaj Lavin Keswani Imaad Khan Hiten Umrania Krishna Mepani Nidhi Mehta

Participation Theories - Final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The aim of our presentation is to show the different types of participation methods used by organizations.This presentation also covers how employees are involved and empowered within the organization structures and how each method of participation helps the organizations achieve their goals.

Citation preview

Page 1: Participation Theories - Final

Introduction to Management

Group presentation:

By,Vaishali BhardwajLavin KeswaniImaad KhanHiten UmraniaKrishna MepaniNidhi Mehta

Page 2: Participation Theories - Final

PARTICIPATION

Page 3: Participation Theories - Final

AIM AND COVERAGE OF PRESENTATION

The aim of our presentation is to show the different types of participation methods used by organizations.

This presentation also covers how employees are involved and empowered within the organization structures and how each method of participation helps the organizations achieve their goals.

Page 4: Participation Theories - Final

INTRODUCTIONEmployee participation can be summarized as the process whereby

employees are involved in decision making processes, rather than simply acting on orders. 

Participation is very necessary and has become an even more nebulous concept and has undetermined relationships with newly emerging constructs and organizational practices such as empowerment, work teams, involvement and flattened organization design.

• Our intent is to preview the various types of techniques regarding participation

Page 5: Participation Theories - Final

INDUSTRY PARTICIPATION SPECTRUM

Co-operative

s

Co-Partnersh

ipESOPs

Representative

Democracy

Socio- Techniqu

es

Ownership Control

Page 6: Participation Theories - Final

CO-OPERATIVES A co-operative is an autonomous association of persons

united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically controlled enterprise.

In Co-operatives the mode of participation is via ownership of the assets.

Problems faced by Co-operatives Inability to attract capital to compete in today’s global market Difficulty in attracting members to serve as directors

Page 7: Participation Theories - Final

CO-PARTNERSHIPUsually a family owned enterprise, where a major

proportion of the share capital is given to the workers and the rest is retained by the family.

When and Why was it started..??Started by the Scott-Bader Commonwealth in Northampton, England towards the end of the 19th century.

Purpose – to involve employees in the working of the business, reward them and secure their future.Greater Rewards - - - Greater Motivation - - - Greater Involvement - - - More Profits

Page 8: Participation Theories - Final

CO PARTNERSHIP IN WORKINGJohn Lewis, a leading retailer in Britain uses

co-partnership to involve its employees in the business.

Employees are referred to as ‘partners’.Involvement is one aspect of participation.

The other aspect is of control, where partners enjoy empowerment in the business.

The partners of John Lewis have the right to ‘elect’ 2/3rds of the board.

Page 9: Participation Theories - Final

Co par

tner

s

show

effec

tive

invo

lvem

ent a

t

work.

Page 10: Participation Theories - Final
Page 11: Participation Theories - Final

ESOPSEmployees share ownership plans (ESOPs) are a

method of giving the workers of an organization the chance to participate in the profits of the organization, via the issuing of shares to each worker at the end of the year taken as cash. A plan can be set and the dividend on them will be received in years to come.

ESOPs occur when a corporation is owned in whole or part by its employees.

Page 12: Participation Theories - Final

Merits of ESOPs: There are substantial tax benefits for employee ownership

companies. Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) are set up by companies

as a kind of employee benefit trust. Employees do not pay taxes on the contributions until they receive

a distribution from the plan when they leave the company. Esops give the employees great tax benefits i.e. they don’t need

to pay taxes on the additional income.

Demerits of ESOPs: While this form of participation is intended to provide

participation via profit share and a feeling of ownership, they do not confer any meaningful ownership but in long run provide a greater opportunity for worker control.

Page 13: Participation Theories - Final

REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACYIt is one of the extremes of participation

spectrumHere, the people elect their representativesThe organization has a degree of freedom in

what it does but is restricted by the fact that it is periodically answerable to the people

Two approachesGerman Approach - positive control.British Approach - negative control.

Page 14: Participation Theories - Final

SOCIO TECHNIQUESSocio techniques are an attempt to enable workers to

participate in their work by stimulating them to greater effort which will lead to greater satisfaction for them.

Socio techniques came into existence due to poor quality of output and vandalism.

Socio-technical design is an attempt to improve Quality of Working Life

Job enrichment and Job enlargement are also the other techniques that fall with in the categories of socio-techniques.

Other techniques include quality circles and leaderless teams .

Page 15: Participation Theories - Final

Satisfied workers can be more productiveSocio-techniques reduces labor turnover rate and

absenteeism from work.

The problems associated are:

Some workers do not want to their job to be enlarged or enriched

There are jobs whose nature itself is difficult to enrich or enlarge.

These techniques are no doubt a good idea but they are not capable of solving the problem of workforce participation

Page 16: Participation Theories - Final

CONCLUSIONCo-Partnership falls in the middle of the

participation continuum, where ownership is not entirely vested on the employees (as in the case of co-operatives) and where the employees do not have full, direct control over decision making and working practices of the business (as in the case of sociotechnical methods of participation)

It has very well balanced both the aspects of participation and has qualified the ‘modern organization’ using this method as a successful, competitive business.