49
1 University of missan Electrical Engineering Department Electronic II, Second year 2015-2016 Part ILectures Bipolar Junction Transistors(BJTs) and Circuits Assistant Lecture: Maab Alaa Hussain

Part ILectures Bipolar Junction Transistors(BJTs) …1 University of missan Electrical Engineering Department Electronic II, Second year 2015-2016 Part ILectures Bipolar Junction Transistors(BJTs)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

University of missan

Electrical Engineering Department

Electronic II, Second year

2015-2016

Part ILectures

Bipolar Junction Transistors(BJTs) and Circuits

Assistant Lecture: Maab Alaa Hussain

2

University of Missan Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJTs)

Basic Construction: The transistor is a three-layer semiconductor device consisting of either two n- and one

p-type layers of material or two p- and one n-type layers of material. The former is

called an npn transistor, while the latter is called a pnp transistor. Both (with symbols)

are shown in Fig. 1 -1. The middle region of each transistor type is called the base (B)

of the transistor. Of the remaining two regions, one is called emitter (E) and the other is

called the collector (C) of the transistor. For each transistor type, a junction is created at

each of the two boundaries where the material changes from one type to the other.

Therefore, there are two junctions: emitter-base (E-B) junction and collector-base

(C-B) junction. The outer layers of the transistor are heavily doped semiconductor

materials having widths much greater than those of the sandwiched p- or n-type

material. The doping of the sandwiched layer is also considerably less than that of the

outer layers (typically 10:1 or less). This lower doping level decreases the conductivity

(increases the resistance) of this material by limiting the number of "free" carriers.

E

n p n

C

E

p n

p

C

(Emitter)

E-B junction

B (Base)

(Collector)

C-B junction

B

E

B

C

Fig. 1-1

E

B

C

The dc biasing is necessary to establish the proper region of operation for ac

amplification or switching purposes. Table 8-1 shows the transistor operation regions

and the purpose with respect to the biasing of the E-B and C-B junctions.

Table 8-1

The abbreviation BJT, from bipolar junction transistor, is often applied to this

three-terminal device. The term bipolar reflects the fact that holes and electrons

participate in the injection process into the oppositely polarized material. If only one

carrier is employed (electron or hole), it is considered a unipolar device. Such a device

is the field-effect transistor (FET).

Operation region Purpose Junctions biasing

E-B junction bias C-B junction bias

1 Active region Amplification Forward-biased Reverse-biased

2 Cutoff region Switching

Reverse-biased Reverse-biased

3 Saturation region Forward-biased Forward-biased

3

University of Misszn Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Active Region Operation:

The basic operation of the transistor will now be described using the pnp transistor of

Fig. 1-2. The operation of the npn transistor is exactly the same if the roles played by

the electron and hole are interchanged. When the E-B junction is forward-biased, a

large number of majority carriers will diffuse across the forward-biased p-n junction

into the n-type material (base). Since the base is very thin and has a low conductivity

(lightly doping), a very small number of these carriers will take this path of high

resistance to the base terminal. The larger number of these majority carriers will diffuse

across the reverse-biased C-B junction into the p-type material (collector). The reason

for the relative ease with which the majority carriers can cross the reverse-biased

C-B junction is easily understood if we consider that for the reverse-biased diode the

injected majority carriers will appear as minority carriers in the n-type base region

material. Combining this with the fact that all the minority carriers in the depletion

region will cross the reverse-biased junction of a diode accounts for the flow indicated

in Fig. 1-2.

Fig. 1-2

Applying Kirchhoff's current law to the transistor of Fig. 1-2, we obtain

I E IC I B

[1.1]

The collector current, however, is comprised of two components: the majority and

minority carriers as indicated in Fig. 1-2. The minority-current component is called the

leakage current and is given the symbol ICO (IC current with emitter terminal Open).

The collector current, therefore, is determined in total by Eq. [1.2].

I C = IC majority + ICO minority

[1.2]

4

University of Missan Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Common-Base (CB) Configuration:

The common-base configuration with npn and pnp transistors are indicated in Fig. 1-3.

The common-base terminology is derived from the fact that the base is common to both

input and output sides of the configuration. In addition, the base is usually terminal

closest to, or at, the ground potential.

I E

E

C

IC

I E

E

C IC

VEE

VBE

B

I B

VCB

VCC

VEE

VEB

B

I B

VBC

VCC

Fig. 1-3

In the dc mode the levels of IC and IE due to the majority carriers are related by a

quantity called alpha (αdc) and defined by the following equation:

dc

IC

I E

[1.3]

Where IC and IE are the levels of current at the point of operation and αdc ≈ 1, or for

practical devices: 0.900 ≤ αdc ≤ 0.998.

Since alpha is defined solely for the majority

carriers and from Fig. 1-4, Eq. [1.2] becomes

IC I E ICBO

[1.4]

Fig. 1-4

The input (emitter) characteristics for a CB

configuration are a plot of the emitter (input)

current (IE) versus the base-to-emitter (input)

voltage (VBE) for a rage of values of the collector-

to-base (output) voltage (VCB) as shown in Fig. 1-5.

Since, the exact shape of this IE-VBE carve will

depend on the reverse-biasing output voltage, VCB.

The reason for this dependency is that the grater the

value of VCB, the more readily minority carriers in

the base are swept through the C-B junction. The

increase in emitter-to-collector current resulting

from an increase in VCB means the emitter current

will be greater for a given value of base-to-emitter

voltage (VBE).

Fig. 1-5

5

University of Missan Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

The output (collector) characteristics for

CB configuration will be a plot of the collector

(output) current (IC) versus collector-to-base

(output) voltage (VCB) for a range of values of

emitter (input) current (IE) as shown in Fig. 1-6.

The collector characteristics have three basic

region of interest, as indicated in Fig. 1-6, the

active, cutoff, and saturation regions.

Active region:

VCB > 0 and IC I E . Cutoff region:

IE = 0 and IC ICBO .

Saturation region: Fig. 1-6

VCB < 0 and IC(sat.) I E(sat.) .

For ac situations where the point of operation moves on the characteristic carve,

an ac alpha (αac) is defined by

ac

IC

I E

VCB const.

[1.5]

The ac alpha is formally called the common-base, short-circuit, amplification factor,

and for most situations the magnitudes of αac and αdc are quite close, permitting the use

of the magnitude of one for other.

Fig. 1-7 shows how the common-base

output characteristics appear when the

effects of breakdown are included. Note the

sudden upward swing of each curve at a

large value of VCB. The collector-to-base

breakdown voltage when IE = 0 (emitter

open) is designed BVCBO.

Fig. 1-7

Transistor Amplification Action:

The basic voltage-amplifying action of the CB configuration can now be described

using the circuit of Fig. 1-8. The dc biasing does not appear in the figure since our

interest will be limited to the ac response. For the CB configuration, the input resistance

between the emitter and the base of a transistor will typically vary from 10 to 100 Ω, while the output resistance may vary from 100 kΩ to 1 MΩ. The difference in

resistance is due to the forward-biased junction at the input (base to emitter) and the

reverse-biased junction at the output (base to collector). Using effective values and a

common value of 20 Ω for the input resistance, we find that

6

B

I B I

University of Missan Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Ii Vi / Ri 200mV / 20Ω 10mA .

If we assume for the moment that

and

αac = 1 (Ic = Ie),

I L Ii 10mA

VL I L R (10mA)(5kΩ) 50V .

The voltage amplification is Fig. 1-8

Av VL /Vi 50V / 200mV 250 .

Typical values of voltage amplification for the common-base configuration vary

from 50 to 300. The current amplification (IC/IE) is always less than 1 for the CB

configuration. This latter characteristic should be obvious since IC = αIE and α is always

less than 1.

The basic amplifying action was produced by transferring a current I from a

low-to a high-resistance circuit. The combination of the two terms in italics results in

the label transistor; that is, transfer + resistor → transistor.

Common-Emitter (CE) Configuration:

The common-emitter configuration with npn and pnp transistors are indicated in

Fig. 8-9. The external voltage source VBB is used to forward bias the E-B junction and

the external voltage source VCC is used to reverse bias C-B junction. The magnitude of

VCC must be greater than VBB to ensure the C-B junction remains reverse biased, since,

as can be seen in the Fig. 1-9, VCB VCC VBB .

IC IC

VBB

I B

VCB

B

VBE

E

C

VCE

I E

VCC

VBB

I B

VBC

VEB

E

C

VEC

I E

VCC

Fig. 1-9

From Eqs. [1.1] and [1.4], we obtain

IC (IC I B ) ICBO

Rearranging yields

1 1

From Fig. 1-10, Eq. [1.6] becomes

[1.6]

ICEO

ICBO

1-

IB 0 [1.7]

Fig. 1-10

IC CBO

7

University of Missan Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

In the dc mode the levels of IC and IB are related by a quantity called beta (βdc)

and defined by the following equation:

βdc

IC

I B

[1.8]

Where IC and IB are the levels of current at the point of operation. For practical devices

the levels of βdc typically ranges from about 50 to over 500, with most in the mid range.

On specification sheets βdc is usually included as hFE with h derived from an ac hybrid

equivalent circuit.

For ac situation an ac beta (βac) has been defined as follows:

β ac

IC

I B

VCE const.

[1.9]

The formal name for βac is common-emitter, forward-current, amplification factor

and on specification sheets βac is usually included as hfe.

A relationship can be developed between β and α using the basic relationships

introduced thus far. Using β IC / I B we have I B IC / β , and from IC / I E

we have I E IC / . Substituting into I E IC I B we have IC / IC IC / β and

dividing both sides of the equation by IC will result in 1/ 1 1/ β or

β β (β 1) so that

Β

β 1

or β

1

[1.10]

In addition, recall that ICEO ICBO /(1 ) but using an equivalence of

1/(1 ) β 1 derived from the above, we find that ICEO (β 1)ICBO or

ICEO βICBO

[1.11]

Beta is particularly important parameter because it provides a direct link between

current levels of the input and output circuits for CE configuration. That is,

IC βI B ICEO βI B

[1.12]

and since I E IC I B βI B I B we have

I E (β 1)I B

[1.13]

8

University of Missan Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

The input (base) characteristics for the CE configuration are a plot of the base

(input) current (IB) versus the base-to-emitter (input) voltage (VBE) for a range of values

of collector-to-emitter (output) voltage (VCE) as shown in Fig. 1-11. Note that IB

increases as VCE decreases, for a fixed value of VBE. A large value of VCE results in a

large reverse bias of the C-B junction, which widens the depletion region and makes the

base smaller. When the base is smaller, there are fewer recombinations of injected

minority carriers and there is a corresponding reduction in base current (IB).

Fig. 1-11 Fig. 1-12

The output (collector) characteristics for CE configuration are a plot of the

collector (output) current (IC) versus collector-to-emitter (output) voltage (VCE) for a

range of values of base (input) current (IB) as shown in Fig. 1-12. The collector

characteristics have three basic region of interest, as indicated in Fig. 1-12, the active,

cutoff, and saturation regions.

Active region: IB > 0 and IC βI B .

Cutoff region: IB = 0 and IC ICEO .

Saturation region: VCE ≈ 0 and I B(sat.) IC(sat.) / β .

Common-Collector (CC) Configuration:

The third and final transistor configuration is the common-collector configuration,

shown in Fig. 1-13 with npn and pnp transistors. The CC configuration is used

primarily for impedance-matching purposes since it has a high input impedance and

low output impedance, opposite to that which is true of the common-base and

common-emitter configurations.

From a design viewpoint, there is no need for a set of common-collector

characteristics to choose the circuit parameters. The circuit can be designed using the

common-emitter characteristics. For all practical purposes, the output characteristics

of the CC configuration are the same as for the CE configuration. For the CC

configuration the output characteristics are a plot of emitter (output) current (IE)

versus collector-to-emitter (output) voltage (VCE), for a range of values of base (input)

9

B B

University of Missan Bipolar Junction Transistors Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

current (IB). The output current, therefore, is the same for both the common-emitter

and common-collector characteristics. There is an almost unnoticeable change in the

vertical scale of IC of the common-emitter characteristics if IC is replaced by IE for the

common-collector characteristics (since 1, I E IC ).

I E I E

VBB

I B

VBE

VCB

C

E

VCE

IC

VCC

VBB

I B

VEB

VBC

C

E

VEC

IC

VCC

Fig. 1-13

Transistor Casing and Terminal Identification:

Whenever possible, the transistor casing will have some marking to indicate which

leads are connected to the emitter, collector, or base of a transistor. A few of the

methods commonly used are indicated in Fig. 1-14.

Fig. 1-14

Exercises:

1. Given an αdc of 0.998, determine IC if IE = 4 mA.

2. Determine αdc if IE = 2.8 mA and IB = 20 µA.

3. Find IE if IB = 40 µA and αdc is 0.98.

4. Given that αdc = 0.987, determine the corresponding value of β.

5. Given βdc = 120, determine the corresponding value of α.

6. Given that βdc = 180 and IC = 2.0 mA, find IE and IB.

7. A transistor has ICBO = 48 nA and α = 0.992.

i. Find β and ICEO.

ii. Find its (exact) collector current (IC) when IB = 30 μA.

iii. Find the approximate collector current, neglecting leakage current.

10

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

DC Biasing Circuits of BJTs

Basic Concepts: The analysis or design of a transistor amplifier requires a knowledge of both the dc and

ac response of the system. Too often it is assumed that the transistor is a magical device

that can raise the level of the applied ac input without the assistance of an external

energy source. In actuality, the improved output ac power level is the result of a

transfer of energy from the applied dc supplies. The analysis or design of any electronic

amplifier therefore has two components: the dc portion and the ac portion. Fortunately,

the superposition theorem is applicable and the investigation of the dc conditions can

be totally separated from the ac response. However, one must keep in mind that during

the design or synthesis stage the choice of parameters for the required dc levels will

affect the ac response, and vice versa.

The term biasing appearing in the title of this lecture is an all-inclusive term for

the application of dc voltages to establish a fixed level of current and voltage. For

transistor amplifiers the resulting dc current and voltage establish an operating point on

the characteristics that define the region that will be employed for amplification of the

applied signal. Since the operating point is a fixed point on the characteristics, it is also

called the quiescent point (abbreviated Q-point). By definition, quiescent means quiet,

still, inactive. Fig. 2-1 shows a general output device characteristic with four operating

points indicated. The biasing circuit can be designed to set the device operation at any

of these points or others within the active region. The maximum ratings are indicated

on the characteristics of Fig. 2-1 by a horizontal line for the maximum collector current

ICmax and a vertical line at the maximum collector-to-emitter voltage VCEmax. The

maximum power constraint is defined by the curve PCmax in the same figure. At the

lower end of the scales are the cutoff region, defined by IB ≤ 0 μA, and the saturation

region, defined by VCE ≤ VCE(sat).

Fig. 2-1

11

I B CC

IC CC

VCEQ VCC

ICQ IC (sat) CC

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Standard Biasing Circuits:

1. Fixed-Bias Circuit:

Fig. 2-2a shows a fixed-bias circuit.

Analysis:

- For the input (base-emitter circuit) loop

as shown in Fig. 2-2b:

VCC I B RB VBE 0

V VBE

RB

[2.1a]

- For the output (collector-emitter circuit) (a)

loop as shown in Fig. 2-2c:

IC βI B

VCE IC RC VCC 0

VCE VCC IC RC

[2.1b]

- For the transistor terminal voltages:

VE 0V

VB VCC I B RB VBE

VC VCC I C RC VCE

[2.1c]

(b) (c)

Load-Line Analysis:

From Eq. [2.1b] and Fig. 2-3: Fig. 2-2

At cutoff region:

VCE VCC IC 0

At saturation region:

[2.2a]

V

RC VCE 0

Design:

For an optimum design:

1

2

1 V

2 2RC

[2.2b]

[2-3]

ICQ

Fig. 2-3

VCEQ

12

VCEQ VCC

ICQ IC (sat)

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

2. Emitter-Stabilized Bias Circuit:

Fig. 2-4a shows an emitter-stabilized bias circuit.

Analysis:

For the input (base-emitter circuit) loop

as shown in Fig. 2-4b:

VCC I B RB VBE I E RE 0

I E (β 1)I B

I B VCC VBE

RB (β 1)RE

[2.4a]

For the output (collector-emitter circuit) (a)

loop as shown in Fig. 2-4c:

I E RE VCE IC RC VCC 0

I E IC

VCE VCC IC (RC RE )

[2.4b]

For the transistor terminal voltages:

VE I E RE

VB VCC I B RB VE VBE

VC VCC IC RC VE VCE

[2.4c]

(b) (c)

Load-Line Analysis:

From Eq. [2.4b] and Fig. 2-5: Fig. 2-4

At cutoff region:

VCE VCC IC 0

At saturation region:

[2.5a]

IC

Design:

VCC

RC RE VCE 0

[2.5b]

ICQ

For an optimum design:

1

2

1 VCC

2 2(RC RE )

VCEQ

[2-6] Fig. 2-5

VE 1

10

VCC

13

I B

VB [2.8a] (d)

IC E E I

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

3. Voltage-Divider Bias Circuit:

Fig. 2-6a shows a voltage-divider bias circuit.

Analyses:

For the input (base-emitter circuit) loop:

Exact Analysis:

From Fig. 2-6b:

RTh R1 R2

From Fig. 2-6c:

[2.7a]

Eth=VR2= R2VCC

R1 R2

[2.7b]

From Fig. 2-6d: (a)

ETh I B RTh VBE I E RE 0

I E (β 1)I B

ETh VBE

RTh (β 1)RE

IC I B

[2.7c]

Approximate Analysis: (b) (c)

From Fig. 2-6e:

If Ri R2 => I 2 I B .

Since I B 0 => I1 I 2 .

Thus R1 in series with R2.

That is,

R2VCC

R1 R2

Since Ri (β 1)RE βRE the condition

that will define whether the approximation

approach can be applied will be the

following:

βRE ≥ 10R2

and

VE VB VBE

V

RE

[2.8b]

[2.8c] (e)

For the output (collector-emitter circuit) loop: Fig. 2-6

VCE VCC IC (RC RE ) [2.9]

14

VCEQ VCC

ETh R2VCC (3.9k )(22)

I B

6.05µA

VB R2VCC (3.9k )(22)

ICQ E 0.867mA VE 1.3

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Load-Line Analysis:

The similarities with the output circuit of the emitter-biased configuration result in the

same intersections for the load line of the voltage-divider configuration. The load line

will therefore have the same appearance as that of Fig. 2-5. The level of IB is of course

determined by a different equation for the voltage-divider bias and the emitter-bias

configuration.

Design:

For an optimum design:

1

2

1 Ic(sat) = VCC

2 2(RC RE )

𝑽𝑬 = 𝟏/𝟏𝟎 𝑽𝒄𝒄

102 R β RE

[2.10]

Example 2-1:

Determine the dc bias voltage VCE and the current IC for the voltage-divider

configuration of Fig. 2-6a with the following parameters: VCC = +22 V, β = 140,

R1 = 39 kΩ, R2 = 3.9 kΩ, RC = 10 kΩ, and RE = 1.5 kΩ.

Solution:

Exact:

RTh R1 R2 39k 3.9k 3.55Ω

2V R1 R2 39k 3.9k

ETh VBE

RTh (β 1)RE

2 - 0.7

3.55k (141)(1.5k )

I CQ β I B (140)(6.05µ ) 0.85mA

VCEQ VCC IC (RC RE )

22 (0.85m)(10k 1.5k )

12.23V

Approximate:

Testing: β RE ≥10R2

(140)(1.5k ) ≥ 10(3.9k )

210kΩ 39kΩ(satisfied)

2V

R1 R2 39k 3.9k

VE VB VBE 2 0.7 1.3V

I

RE 1.5k

VCEQ VCC IC (RC RE )

22 (0.867m)(10k 1.5k )

12.03V

15

VCEQ VCC

IC (sat)

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

4. Voltage-Feedback Bias Circuit:

Fig. 2-7a shows a voltage-feedback bias circuit.

Analysis:

For the input (base-emitter circuit) loop

as shown in Fig. 2-7b:

VCC IC RC I B RB VBE I E RE 0

IC IC I B I EIC β I B

VCC β I B RC I B RB VBE β I B RE 0

I B VCC VBE

RB β (RC RE )

[2.11a]

For the output (collector-emitter circuit) (a)

loop as shown in Fig. 2-7c:

I E RE VCE IC' RC VCC 0

IC' I E IC

VCE VCC IC (RC RE )

[2.11b]

Load-Line Analysis:

Continuing with the approximation IC IC will result

in the same load line defined for the voltage-divider and

emitter-biased configurations. The levels of IBQ will be

defined by the chosen base configuration.

(b)

Design:For an optimum design:

1

2

ICQ 1 VCC

2 2(RC RE )

[2-12]

VE 1

10

VCC

RB ≤ β (RC RE )

(c)

Fig. 2-7

Ic'

Ic'

Ic'

Ic(sat)=

16

I B EE BE V 83µA

V VEE 20 20

I B EE Th BE

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Other Biasing Circuits:

Example 2-2: (Negative Supply)

Determine VC and VB for the circuit of Fig. 2-8.

Solution:

I B RB VBE VEE 0 (KVL)

V - V 9 0. 7

RB 100k

IC β I B (45)(83µ ) 3.735mA

VC I C RC (3.735m)(1.2k ) 4.48V

VB I B RB (83µ )(100k ) 8.3V

Example 2-3: (Two Supplies)

Determine VC and VB for the circuit of Fig. 2-9a.

Solution:

From Fig. 2-9b:

RTh R1 R2 8.2k 2.2k 1.73kΩ

I CC 3.85mA R1 R2 8.2k 2.2k

ETh IR2 VEE (3.85m)(2.2k ) 20 11.53V

Fig. 2-8

(a)

From Fig. 2-9c:

ETh I B RTh VBE I E RE VEE 0

I E (β 1)I B

V E V

RTh (β 1)RE

(KVL)

(b)

20 11.53 0.7

1.73k (121)(1.8k ) 35.39µA

IC β I B (120)(35.39µ ) 4.25mA

VC VCC IC RC 20 (4.25m)(2.7k ) 8.53V

VB ETh I B RTh (11.53) (35.39µ )(1.73k )

11.59V

(c)

Fig. 2-9

=k100

7.09.0

17

V VBE 4 0.7

I B 45.8µA

I B

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Example 2-4: (Common-Base)

Determine VCB and IB for the common-base configuration of Fig. 2-10.

Solution:

Applying KVL to the input circuit:

VEE I E RE VBE 0

I E EE 2.75mA

RE 1.2k

Applying KVL to the output circuit:

VCB I C RC VCC 0

VCB VCC IC RC

with IC I E

VCB 10 (2.75m)(2.4k ) 3.4V

Fig. 2-10

IC 2 .75m

β 60

Example 2-5: (Common-Collector)

Determine IE and VCE for the common-collector (emitter-follower) configuration of

Fig. 2-11.

Solution:

Applying KVL to the input circuit:

I B RB VBE I E RE VEE 0

I E (β 1)I B

VEE VBE

RB (β 1)RE

20 0.7

240k (91)(2k ) 45.73µA

I E (β 1)I B (91)(45.73µ ) 4.16mA

Applying KVL to the output circuit:

VEE I E RE VCE 0

VCE VEE I E RE 20 (4.16m)(2k ) 11.68V

Fig. 2-11

-

-

18

VB 3.16V

IC E 2.24mA VE 2.46

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Example 2-6: (PNP Transistor)

Determine VCE for the voltage-divider bias configuration of Fig. 2-12.

Solution:

Testing: β RE ≥ 10R2

(120)(1.1k ) ≥ 10(10k )

132kΩ ≥100kΩ(satisfied )

R2VCC (10k )(18)

R1 R2 47k 10k

VE VB VBE 3.16 (0.7) 2.46V

I

RE 1.1k

I E RE VCE IC RC VCC 0 (KVL)

VCE VCC IC (RC RE )

18 (2.24m)(2.4k 1.1k ) 10.16V

Fig. 2-12

Exercises:

1. For the fixed-biased configuration of Fig. 2-2a with the following parameters:

VCC = +12 V, β = 50, RB = 240 kΩ, and RC = 2.2 kΩ, determine:

IBQ, ICQ, VCEQ, VB, VC, and VBC.

2. Given the device characteristics of Fig. 2-13a, determine VCC, RB, and RC for the

fixed-bias configuration of Fig. 2-13b.

(a) (b)

Fig. 2-13

19

University of Missan DC Biasing Circits of BJTs Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

3. For the emitter bias circuit of Fig. 2-4a with the following parameters:

VCC = +20 V, β = 50, RB = 430 kΩ, RC = 2 kΩ, and RE = 1 kΩ, determine:

IB, IC, VCE, VC, VE, VB and VBC.

4. Design an emitter-stabilized circuit (Fig. 2-4a) at ICQ = 2 mA. Use VCC = +20 V

and an npn transistor with β =150.

5. Determine the dc bias voltage VCE and the current IC for the voltage-divider

configuration of Fig. 2-6a with the following parameters: VCC = +18 V, β = 50,

R1 = 82 kΩ, R2 = 22 kΩ, RC = 5.6 kΩ, and RE = 1.2 kΩ.

6. Design a beta-independent (voltage-divider) circuit to operate at VCEQ = 8 V and

ICQ = 10 mA. Use a supply of VCC = +20 V and an npn transistor with β = 80.

7. Determine the quiescent levels of ICQ and VCEQ for the voltage-feedback circuit

of Fig. 2-7a with the following parameters: VCC = +10 V, β = 90, RB = 250 kΩ, RC = 4.7 kΩ, and RE = 1.2 kΩ.

8. Prove that RB β (RC RE ) is the required condition for an optimum design of

the voltage-feedback circuit.

9. Prove mathematically that ICQ for the voltage-feedback bias circuit is approximately

independent of the value of beta.

10. Fig. 2-14 shows a three-stage circuit with a VCC supply of +20 V. GND stands for

ground. If all transistors have a β of 100, what are the IC and VCE of each stage?

20V

vi

10µF

2kΩ

3kΩ

10µF

10µF

50kΩ

10µF

vo

100kΩ

0.56kΩ

8kΩ

3kΩ

0.68kΩ

GND

Fig. 2-14

20

IC IC

β β

University of Missan Bias Stabilization Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2009 - 2010 Maab Alaa Hussain

Bias Stabilization

Basic Definitions:

The stability of system is a measure of sensitivity of a circuit to variations in its

parameters. In any amplifier employing a transistor the collector current IC is sensitive

to each of the following parameters:

ICO (reverse saturation current): doubles in value for every 10oC increase in

temperature.

|VBE| (base-to-emitter voltage): decrease about 7.5 mV per 1oC increase in

temperature.

β (forward current gain): increase with increase in temperature.

Any or all of these factors can cause the bias point to drift from the design point of

operation.

Stability Factors, S(ICO), S(VBE), and S(β):

A stability factor, S, is defined for each of the parameters affecting bias stability as

listed below:

S (ICO )

S (VBE )

IC

ICO

IC

VBE

IC

ICO

IC

VBE

VBE , β const.

ICO , β const.

[3.1a]

[3.1b]

S (β )

ICO ,VBE const.

[3.1c]

Generally, networks that are quite stable and relatively insensitive to temperature

variations have low stability factors. In some ways it would seem more appropriate to

consider the quantities defined by Eqs. [3.1a - 3.1c] to be sensitivity factors because:

the higher the stability factor, the more sensitive the network to variations in that

parameter.

The total effect on the collector current can be determined using the following

equation:

IC S (ICO )ICO S (VBE )VBE S (β ) β

[3.2]

21

I B β β

ICO VBE ETh (β 1)RE RTh ( β 1)(RE RTh )

IC [

(IC 1 / β 1 )(RE Th )

University of Missan Bias Stabilization Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Derivation of Stability Factors for Standard Bias Circuits:

For the voltage-divider bias circuit, the exact analysis (using Thevenin theorem) for the

input (base-emitter) loop will result in:

and

and

or

ETh I B RTh VBE I E RE 0 ,

I E IC I B =>

IC RE I B (RE RTh ) VBE ETh ,

I C β I B (β 1)I CO ,

IC β +1 ICO =>

β β

The partial derivation of the Eq. [3.3] with respect to ICO will result:

[3.3]

I C

I CO

(β 1)RE RTh

β

(β 1)(RE RTh )

β

0

S (ICO )

(β 1)(RE RTh )

(β 1)RE RTh

[3.4a]

Also, the partial derivation of the Eq. [3.3] with respect to VBE will result:

I C

VBE

(β 1)RE RTh

β

1 0

S (VBE )

β

(β 1)RE RTh

[3.4b]

The mathematical development of the last stability factor S(β) is more complex than

encountered for S(ICO) and S(VBE). Thus, S(β) is suggested by the following equation:

S (β )

R

(β 2 1)RE RTh

[3.4c]

]- ICO [

22

(I C 1 / β 1 )(RE B )

IC 1

β 1

(I C 1 / β 1 )(RC E B )

University of Missan Bias Stabilization Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2009 - 2010 Maab Alaa Hussain

For the emitter-stabilized bias circuit, the stability factors are the same as these

obtained above for the voltage-divider bias circuit except that RTh will replaced by RB.

These are:

S (ICO )

S (VBE )

(β 1)(RE RB )

(β 1)RE RB

β

(β 1)RE RB

[3.5a]

[3.5b]

S (β )

R

(β 2 1)RE RB

[3.5c]

resul:

For the fixed-bias circuit, if we plug in RE = 0 the following equation will

S (ICO ) β 1

[3.6a]

S (VBE )

β

RB

[3.6b]

S (β) [3.6c]

Finally, for the case of the voltage-feedback bias circuit, the following equation

will result:

S (ICO )

S (VBE )

(β 1)(RC RE RB )

(β 1)(RC RE ) RB

β

(β 1)(RC RE ) RB

[3.7a]

[3.7b]

S ( )

R R

(β 2 1)(RC RE ) RB

[3.7c]

23

VB VE VBE 1.5 0.7 2.2V . R2 5kΩ

R2 VB RE 1.5kΩ

VB => [10.8a]

( 1)(RE RTh )

(β 1)RE RTh

(81)(1.5k RTh )

RTh => R2 RTh 4.4k

University of Missan Bias Stabilization Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Example 3-1:

1. Design a voltage-divider bias circuit using a VCC supply of +18 V, and an npn silicon

transistor with β of 80. Choose RC = 5RE, and set IC at 1 mA and the stability factor

S(ICO) at 3.8.

2. For the circuit designed in part (1), determine the change in IC if a change in

operating conditions results in ICO increasing from 0.2 to 10 μA, VBE drops from

0.7 to 0.5 V, and β increases 25%.

3. Calculate the change in IC from 25o to 75oC for the same circuit designed in part (1),

if ICO = 0.2 μA and VBE = 0.7 V.

Solution:

VCC

18V

Part 1:

VCE VCC / 2 18 / 2 9V . RC 7.5kΩ

VCE VCC IC (RC RE ) , RC 5RE => R1 36kΩ Co

9 18 (1m)(5RE RE ) => RE 1.5kΩ . Ci

RC 5(1.5k ) 7.5kΩ. vi β 80

I E IC 1mA , VE I E RE (1m)(1.5k ) 1.5V .

R2VCC 2 .2

R1 R2 R1 R2 VCC 18

S (ICO ) => Fig. 3-1

3.8 => RTh 4.4kΩ . (81)(1.5k ) RTh

vo

R1R2

R1 R2

R1 R 2

R1 R1

[3.8b]

From Eqs. [3.8a] and [3.8b]:

4 .4k

R1

2 .2

18 => R1 36kΩ .

From Eq. [3.8a]:

R2

36k R2

2. 2

18 => R2 5kΩ .

Fig. 3-1 shows the final circuit.

β

24

-80

(β+1) RE +RTh

(Ic1/ β1)(RE+RTH) (1m/80)(1.5k)+4.4k

( β2+1) RE+RTH

Thus 10

T= 5

10

2575

, Ico(75 o C)=2N.Ico(25o C)=(25)(0.2µ)=6.4µA

University of Missan Bias Stabilization Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Part 2:

S (ICO ) 3.8 ,

ICO 10µ 0.2µ 9.8µA .

S (VBE ) 0.635mS ,

VBE 0.5 0.7 .02V .

β 2 β 1 (1 25 /100) 1.25 β 1 1.25(80) 100 ,

S (β ) 0.473µA , (101)(1.5k ) 4.4k

β 100 80 20 .

IC S (ICO )ICO S (VBE )VBE S (β ) β

(3.8)(9.8µ ) (0.635m)(0.2) (0.473µ )(20) 0.174mA .

Part 3:

Since ICO, doubles in value for every 10oC increase in temperature.

ICO 6.4µ 0.2µ 6.2µA .

Since VBE, decreases about 7.5 mV per 1oC increase in temperature.

Thus T 75 25 50o C , VBE (25o C) 0.7V =>

VBE (75o C) 0.7 50(7.5m) 0.325V .

IC S (ICO )ICO S (VBE )VBE

(3.8)(6.2µ ) (0.635m)(0.375) 0.262mA .

Exercises:

1. Derive a mathematical expression to determine the stability factor

S (VCC ) I C VCC for the emitter-stabilized bias circuit.

2. Discuss and compare (by equations) between the relative levels of stability for the

following biasing circuits:

i. the fixed-bias circuit,

ii. the emitter-stabilized bias circuit,

iii. the voltage-divider bias circuit, and

iv. the voltage-feedback circuit.

(81)(1.5k)+(4.4k)

- β

25

RB VCE

(a) (b)

I B i BE

IC(sat) CC

I B(max) [4.3]

University of Missan BJT Switching Circuits Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

BJT Switching Circuits

Basic Concepts: The application of transistors is not limited solely to the amplification of signals.

Through proper design it can be used as a switch for computer and control applications.

The circuit of Fig. 4-1a can be employed as an inverter in computer logic circuitry.

Note that the output voltage VC is opposite to that applied to the base or input terminal.

In addition, note the absence of a dc supply connected to the base circuit. The only dc

source is connected to the collector or output side and for computer applications is

typically equal to the magnitude of the "high" side of the applied signal-in this case 5V.

VCC 5V

RC

5V

0V

Vi

VBE

VC 5V

0V

Fig. 4-1

Proper design for the inversion process requires that the operating point switch

from cutoff to saturation along the load line depicted in Fig. 4-1b. For our purposes

we will assume that IC ICEO 0 mA when I B 0 μA (an excellent approximation

in light of improving construction techniques), as shown in Fig. 4-1b. In addition, we

will assume that VCE VCE (sat ) 0 V rather than the typical 0.1 to 0.3 V level.

When Vi = 5 V, the transistor will be "on" and the design must ensure that the

circuit is heavily saturated by a level of IB greater than that associated with the IB

curve appearing near the saturation level.

The base current IB for the circuit of Fig. 4-1a is determined by

V V [4.1]

RB

The saturation level for collector current IC(sat) for the same circuit is defined by

V

RC

[4.2]

The level of IB in the active region just before saturation results can be approximated

by the following equation:

IC (sat )

For the saturation level we must therefore ensure that the following is satisfied:

I B I B(max) [4.4]

26

42.3µA . I B i BE

32.3µA . I B(max)

When Vi 0V , VB 0.8V , hence the

RC 1.6kΩ transistor is at cutoff, so that D1 and D2 are on and

Vo 4 0.7 0.3 5V .

When Vi 5V , RTh 5k 20k 4k ,

(5)(20k ) (4)(5k ) ETh 3.2V ,

20k 5k 20k 5k

I B Th

BE V

3.2 0.7 R2 20kΩ

625µA . RTh

IC (sat ) 12.5mA ,

I B B(max) => 20 . IC (sat) 12.5m

625µ

University of Missan BJT Switching Circuits Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Example 4-1:

Verify that the circuit shown in Fig. 4-2 behaves like an inverter when the input

switches between 0 V and +10 V. Assume that the transistor is silicon and that β = 50.

Solution:

It is only necessary to verify that the transistor is

VCC 10V

saturated when Vi = +10 V.

V V 10 0 .7

RB 22k0

IC (sat ) VCC 10

RC (50)(6.2k )

Thus, we have I B I B(max) , therefore the transistor is

Vi

RB

220kΩ

RC 6.2kΩ

Vo

50

saturated, and the circuit is inverter. Fig. 4-2

Example 4-2:

Verify that the circuit shown in Fig. 4-3 is an inverter when the input switches

between 0 V and -5 V. What minimum value of β is required? Assume that the

transistor is silicon.

Solution:

(4)(5k ) VCC 20V

20k 5k

D2

D1 4V Vo Si Ge

R1 Vi

5kΩ

E

4k 4V

We assume the transistor is at saturation, Vo 0V , Fig. 4-3

so that D1 and D2 are off and

VCC 20

RC 1.6k

I B (max) IC (sat) / 12.5mA / .

For the transistor to be in saturation,

I I B

Vo=-4-0.7-0.3=-5v

-5v,RTh=5kII20k=4kΩ

27

University of Missan BJT Switching Circuits Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Exercise:

1. Design the transistor inverter of Fig. 4-4 to operate with a saturation current of

8 mA using a transistor with a beta of 100. Use a level of IB equal to 120% of

IB(max) and standard resistor values.

VCC 5V

RC

Vi Vo

5

0

t

Vi RB

100

Fig. 4-4

2. Verify that the circuit shown in Fig. 4-5 is a positive NAND when the input

switches between 0 V and +12 V. Neglect source impedance and junction saturation

voltages and diode voltages in forward direction. Find the minimum value of β.

VCC

12V

12V RC 2.2kΩ

VA

VB

D1

D2

R1 15kΩ R2

15kΩ

R3

100kΩ

Vo

12V

Fig. 4-5

28

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit

Basic Concepts: The key to the transistor small-signal analysis is the use of ac equivalent circuits or

models. A model is the combination of circuit elements, properly chosen, that best

approximates the actual behavior of a semiconductor device (BJT) under specific

operating conditions. Once the ac equivalent circuit has been determined, the graphical

symbol of the device can be replaced in the schematic by this circuit and the basic

methods of ac circuit analysis (mesh analysis, nodal analysis, and Thevenin's theorem)

can be applied to determine the response of the circuit. There are two schools of

thought in prominence today regarding the equivalent circuit to be substituted for the

transistor: hybrid and re model.

In summary, the ac equivalent circuit of the BJT amplifier is obtained by

(see Fig. 5-1):

1. Setting all dc sources to zero and replacing them by a short-circuit equivalent.

2. Replacing all capacitors by a short-circuit equivalent.

3. Removing all elements bypassed by the short-circuit equivalents introduced by

stapes 1 and 2.

4. Redrawing the circuit in a more convenient and logical form.

5. Use the hybrid or re equivalent circuit of the BJT to complete the equivalent circuit

of the amplifier.

6. Finally, the following parameters are determined for the amplifier:

a. Input impedance (Zi). b. Output impedance (Zo). c. Voltage gain (Av).

d. Current gain (Ai). e. Phase relationship (θ).

(a) (b)

(c)

Fig. 5-1

29

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

The Hybrid (h-parameters) Equivalent Model:

For the general hybrid two-port system of Fig. 5-2:

Vi h11Ii h12Vo

I o h21Ii h22Vo

[5.1a]

[5.1b]

Fig. 5-2

where

h11

h12

h21

h22

Vi

Ii

Vi

Vo

I o

Ii

Io

Vo

Vo 0

Ii 0

Vo 0

Ii 0

hi (Ω) , short-circuit input impedance parameter.

hr (unitless) , open-circuit reverse transfer voltage ratio parameter.

h f (unitless) , short-circuit forward transfer current ratio parameter.

ho (S ) , open-circuit output admittance parameter.

From the BJT hybrid equivalent circuit of Fig. 5-3, Eqs. [5.1a] and [5.1b] becomes:

Vi hi Ii hrVo

I o h f Ii hoVo

[5.2a]

[5.2b]

Fig. 5-3

30

Ii i r o , I o o , and Io f i o o => h I h V

Av

Ai

I R hi r o , and Vo o L => h hi r L o hi r L i => h R h R A

Zi hi

VS i S i r o 0 => Ii hrVo

Zo

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Gain and Impedance Computation of the Complete Hybrid Equivalent Circuit:

For the circuit of Fig. 5-4,

RS

Ii

hi

Io

VS

Vi

Zi

hrVo

h f iI

Zo

1/ ho

Vo

RL

Fig. 5-4

the voltage gain (Av = Vo/Vi);

V h V V

hi RL

Vo

Vi

h f RL

hi (hi ho h f hr )RL

[5.3a]

the current gain (Ai = Io/Ii);

Io h f Ii 1 ho

1 ho RL

h f iI

1 ho RL

=>

Io

Ii

h f

1 ho RL

[5.3b]

the input impedance (Zi = Vi/Ii);

Vi

Ii

V

Ii

Vi

Ii

I

Ii

Vi

Ii

h f hr RL

1 ho RL

[5.3c]

the output impedance (Zo = Vo/Io when VS = 0 V);

I (R h ) h V

RS hi

, and I o h f Ii hoVo =>

I o = hoVo - o h f hr

RS hi

Vo =>

Vo

I o

ho

1

h f hr

RS hi

[5.3d]

- -

-

31

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Types of Hybrid Parameters:

Since there are three types of BJT configuration (CE, CC, and CB), there are three

different ways that the input and output can be defined and therefore three

corresponding sets of h-parameters as shown in Table 5-1. If all of the h-parameters

values in one configuration are known, then the values corresponding to any other

configuration can be determined. The common-emitter values of the h-parameters are

the ones most often given.

Table 5-1

The hybrid equivalent circuits of the CE and CB transistor configuration are

shown in Fig. 5-5 (a) and (b) respectively.

(a)

(b)

Fig. 5-5

BJT configuration h-parameters sets

1 Common-Emitter hie , hfe , hre , hoe

2 Common-Collector hic , hfc , hrc , hoc

3 Common-Base hib , hfb , hrb , hob

32

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Table 5-2 lists typical parameter values in each of the three transistor

configurations (CE, CC, and CB) for the broad range of transistors available today.

Table 5-2

Graphical Determination of the CE Hybrid Parameters:

The parameters hie and hre are determined from the input or base characteristics, while

the parameters hfe and hoe are obtained from the output or collector characteristics as

shown in Fig. 5-6.

hie

vbe

ib

VCE const.

1.5kΩ

hre

vbe

vce

I B const.

4 104

h fe

ic

ib

VCE const.

100

hoe

ic

vce

IB const.

33µS

Fig. 5-6

h-parameters CE CC CB

hi 1kΩ 1kΩ 20kΩ

hr 2.5×10-4 ≈ 1 3.0×10-4

hf 50 −50 −0.98

ho 25 μS 25 μS 0.5 μS

1/ho 40 kΩ 40 kΩ 2 MΩ

33

Ai h fe , and Av h fe L Ai o .

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

For the transistor whose characteristics have appeared in Fig. 5-6, the resulting

hybrid small-signal equivalent circuit is shown in Fig. 5-7.

Fig. 5-7

The typical values of h-parameters for CE transistor configuration are shown in

Table 5-3.

Table 5-3

Approximate CE Hybrid Equivalent Model:

Since hre is normally a relatively small quantity, its removal is approximated by hre ≈ 0

and hreVce = 0, resulting in a short-circuit equivalent for the feedback element. The

resistance determined by 1/hoe is often large enough to be ignored in comparison to a

parallel load permitting its replacement by an open-circuit equivalent for the CE model

as shown in Fig. 5-8.

b

Ib

Ic

c

Io

Vi

Zi

hie

h fe Ib

Zo

Vo

Zo'

RL

e

e

Fig. 5-8

For the circuit of Fig. 5-8,

Zi hie , and Z o .

Ic Vo I o RL I c RL R Z '

Ib Vi Ib hie Ib hie hie Zi

hxe parameters Min. Max. Unit

Input impedance hie 0.5 7.5 kΩ

Voltage feedback ratio hre 0.1 8.0 -4 ×10

Small-signal current gain hfe 20 250 −

Output admittance hoe 1.0 30 μS

34

Vo RL R

I I c e , and Ai c =>

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

The re Equivalent Model:

CB Transistor Configuration:

From Fig. 5-9, the input impedance at the emitter of CB transistor configuration

(dynamic resistance of the forward diode) can de determined by:

re

26mV

I E

[5.4]

the output impedance at the collector (dynamic resistance of the reverse diode) is:

ro

also;

Zi re , and Zo

Vo Io RL (Ic )RL Ie RL , and Vi I e Zi I ere =>

Av L . Vi re re

I o I

Ii I e

Ai .

(a) (b) (c)

(d) (e)

Fig. 5-9

RL

Ie

35

Zi re .

Vo Vo Ib RL R

Ib er

I c Ib

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

CE Transistor Configuration:

From Fig. 12-10;

I c Ib , I e I c Ib Ib Ib ( 1)Ib Ib , and

Vbe I ere Ib re .

Vi Vbe

Ii Ib

Z o ro .

Vo I o RL I c RL Ib RL ,

Av L Vi Vbe re

Ai

I o

Ii

. Ib Ib

(a) (b) (c)

(d) (e) (g)

Fig. 5-10

36

University of Missan BJT Modeling and AC Equivalent Circuit Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Hybrid Versus re Model:

The hybrid versus re model for CE and CB transistor configurations are shown in

Figs. 5-11 (a) and (b) respectively.

(a)

(b)

Fig. 5-11

Approximate Conversion Formulas for Hybrid and re Models:

The approximate conversion formulas for hybrid and re models for CB and CC

configurations are listed in Table 5-4.

Table 5-4

Exercise:

Given IE = 1.3 mA, β = 100, and ro = 40 kΩ, sketch:

1. The CE and CB hybrid equivalent models.

2. The CE and CB re equivalent models.

CB Configuration CC Configuration

hib hie (1 h fe ) re hic hie re

hrb hiehoe (1 h fe ) hre hrc 1 hre 1

h fb h fe (1 h fe ) h fc (1 h fe )

hob hoe (1 h fe ) hoc hoe 1/ ro

37

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

BJT Small-Signal Analysis

Common-Emitter Configuration:

The voltage divider circuit of Fig. 6-1 includes an emitter resistor (RE) that may or

may not be bypassed by an emitter capacitor (CE) in the ac domain.

VCC

RS

Vs

Ii CS

Zi

Vi

R1

B

Zb

R2

C

E

RC C

Zo

RE

C

Io

Vo

CE

Zo

RL

Zin

Fig. 6-1

Bypassed (absence of RE):

For the ac equivalent circuit of Fig. 6-2,

Ii

b Ib

Ic

c

Io

RS

Vs

Zi

Vi

R

Zb

re

hie e

Ib

h fe Ib

ro

1/ hoe

Zo

RC Vo

Zo

RL

Zin

Fig. 6-2

Using re equivalent model:

Input impedance:

R R1 R2

Zb re

Zi R Zb R re

Zin RS Zi RS (R re )

38

Av L C o

Avs Av

I o I o I c I ro RC R

[ro C L C L )(R re )

Ai b Ai

.

RC R

R Zb

RC R (RC L )(R re )

Ais Ai

Av L C

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Output impedance:

Approximate (neglecting ro); Exact (including ro);

Z o RC Z o RC ro

Z o RL Z o RL RC Z o RL RC ro

Voltage gain:

Approximate (neglecting ro); Exact (including ro);

Vo I c Z o Ib (RL RC ) R R r

re

Ib Vi

Zb

Vi

re

Vo Vo Vi

Vs Vi Vs

Zi

Zi RS

Current gain:

Approximate (neglecting ro); Exact (including ro);

Ii I c Ib Ii (R R )](R R

RC RL

R

I o I o Ii

I s Ii I s

RS

RS Zi

Phase relationship:

The negative sign in the resulting equation for Av reveals that a 180o phase shift

occurs between the input and output voltage signals.

Zo Zo

IcZo

o

CL

i

o

r

RR

V

V

39

Av

h fe RC R

(RC L )(R hie ) Ai

Av

[1/ hoe C L C L )(R hie ) Ai

Zb re ( 1)RE (re RE ) RE

Ib

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Using hybrid equivalent model:

Approximate (neglecting hoe); Exact (including hoe);

Zb hie

h fe ( R L RC)

hie

R

h fe (RL RC 1 / hoe )

hie

h fe RC R/ hoe

(R R )](R R

Unbypassed (include of RE):

For the approximate ac equivalent circuit ( ro 1/ hoe Ω ) of Fig. 6-3,

Ii

b Ib

Ic

c

Io

RS

Vs

Zi

Vi

R

Zb

re

hie

e

I e

Ib

h fe Ib

Zo

RC Vo

Zo

RL

RE

Fig. 6-3

Using re equivalent model:

Input impedance:

Vi Ib re I e RE Ib [re ( 1)RE ]

Vi

Ib

Zi R Zb R [re ( 1)RE ] R (re RE ) R RE

Output impedance:

Z o RC

Z o RL Z o RL RC

Voltage gain:

Vo IcZo Ib (RL RC )

Vi

Zb

Vi

(re RE )

-

Z'o

Z'o

40

L C L C

Ai b

RC R

R Zb

RC R RC R

(RC L )[R (re E )] (RC L )(R RE )

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Av

Vo

Vi

R R R R

re RE RE

Current gain:

I o I o I c I

I i I c I b Ii

RC RL

R R R

Phase relationship:

Vo and Vi are out-of-phase by 180o.

Using hybrid equivalent model:

Common-Base Configuration:

The common-base configuration of Fig. 6-4 is characterized as having a relatively

low input and a high output impedance and a current gain less than 1. The voltage gain,

however, can be quite large.

Ii CS

E

C

CC I

o

RS

Vs

Zi

Vi

Zb

RE

VEE

B

Zo

RC

VCC

Vo

Zo

RL

Fig. 6-4

41

(RL RC )

RC RE

Av

Ai Fig. 6-6

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Using re equivalent model:

For the approximate ac equivalent circuit ( ro Ω) of Fig. 6-5,

Input impedance:

Zb re

Zi RE re [low]

Output impedance:

Zo RC [high]

RL RC

RS

Vs

Ii

Zi

Vi

e Ie

Zb

R E

re

b

Ic

Ie

c

Io

Zo

RC Vo

Zo

RL

Fig. 6-5

Voltage gain:

Vo I c Zo I e (RL RC )

I e Vi / re

Av

re

RL RC

re

[high]

Current gain:

[less than 1] (RC RL )(RE re )

Phase relationship:

Vo and Vi are in-phase.

Using hybrid equivalent model:

For the approximate ac equivalent circuit (1/ hob Ω) of Fig. 6-6,

Zb hib

Zi RE hib

hfb (R L R C)

hib

RS

Vs

Ii

Zi

Vi

e Ie

Zb

R E

hib

b

Ic c

h fb Ie

Io

Zo

RC Vo

Zo

RL

h fb RC RE

(RC RL )(RE hib )

[hfb: -ve quantity]

Z'o

Z'o

-

42

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Common-Collector (Emitter-Follower] Configuration:

When the output is taken from the emitter terminal of the transistor, an amplifier

circuit is referred to as emitter-follower as shown in Fig. 6-7. The emitter-follower

configuration is frequently used for impedance-matching purposes. It presents a high

impedance at the input and a low impedance at the output. Also, the output voltage is

always slightly less than the input signal with an in-phase relationship between them.

VCC

Ii CS

RB

B

C

RS

Vs

Zi

Vi

Zb

E

CC

Zo

RE

Io

Vo

Zo RL

Fig. 6-7

Using re equivalent model:

For the ac equivalent circuit of Fig. 6-8,

Ii

b Ib

Ic

c

RS

Vs

Zi

Vi

RB

Zb

re

hie

e

I e

Ib

h fe Ib

Io

RE

Zo

Vo

RL

Fig. 6-8

Input impedance:

R RL RE

Vi Ib re I e R Ib[re ( 1)R]

Zb Vi / Ib re ( 1)R

(re R) R [high]

Zi RB Zb

43

RTh S B , and ETh Vs RB

Ib

I e ( 1)Ib

Av

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Output impedance:

Vs Ii RS Ib re I e R 0

[KVL]

For the circuit of Fig. 13-9a,

R R

RS RB

where RB >> RS =>

RTh RS , ETh Vs , and Ii Ib

Vs Ib RS Ib re Ib ( 1)R 0

Vs

RS re ( 1)R

( 1)Vs

RS re ( 1)R

Vs

RS / re R

Vs

RS

Vs

RS /

RS / h fe

Vi

RB

Thevenin

(a)

re Ie Io

hie / h fe Zo

RE Vo

(b)

Zo

RL

Fig. 6-9

Drawing the circuit to "fit" the above last

equation will result in the configuration

of Fig. 6-9b. Thus

Z o RE (RS / re )

Z o RL Zo

[low]

Voltage gain:

Vo

Vi

I e R

I e (R re )

R

R re

[less than 1]

Avs

Vo

Vs

R

R Rs / re

Current gain:

Z 'o

44

3kΩ C

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Using hybrid equivalent model:

Zb hie (h fe 1)R h fe R

Z o RE (RS hie ) / h fe

Av

Avs

R

R hie / h fe

R

R (Rs hie ) / h fe

Ai h fe RE RB

(RE RL )(RB h fe R)

Example 6-1:

For the BJT amplifier circuit of Fig. 6-10 with the following parameters:

VBE = 0.7 V, β = hfe ≈ 250, and ro = 1/hoe ≈ ∞ Ω, determine:

(a) re, and dc output voltage (VC).

(b) hie, Zb, Zi, Zo, and Zo .

(c) Av = Vo/Vi, and Ai = Io/Ii.

(d) Avs Vo /Vs , and ac output voltage (Vo).

VCC 20V

Ii CS

RS 750Ω

Vs 25mV

RC

R1 91kΩ

Zo

Zi Zb

Vi R2 10kΩ RE1 180Ω

820Ω

RE2

C Io

Vo RL

CE

Zo

12kΩ

Fig. 6-10

45

V . R2 VB CC 1.98V , I E B BE

re 20.3Ω , IC E 1.28mA , and I

h fe Z o 250(2.4k ) Zi

Avs Av i Av 10.87 , and

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Solution:

Testing: RE ≥10R2 , RE RE1 RE 2 0.18k 0.82k 1kΩ,

250(1k ) ≥ 10(10k ) , 250k 100k Satisfied,

R1 R2

20(10k )

10k 91k

V - V

RE

1 .98 0 .7

1k

1.28mA ,

26mV 26m

I E 1.28m

VC VCC IC RC 20 1.28m(3k ) 16.16V .

hie re 250(20.3) 5.075kΩ ,

Zb hie (h fe 1)RE1 5.075k 251(0.18k ) 50.26kΩ ,

R R1 R2 91k 10k 9.01kΩ , Zi R Zb 9.01k 50.26k 7.64kΩ ,

Z o RC 3kΩ , and Z o RL RC 12k 3k 2.4kΩ .

Av 11.94 , and Ai Av Zb 50.26k RL

V Zi 11 .94( 7. 64k )

Vs Zi RS 7.64k 0.75k

Vo Avs Vs 10.87(25m) 271.75mV .

11 .94( 7. 64k )

12k

7.6.

Example 6-2:

Design the BJT amplifier circuit shown in Fig. 6-11 to have a voltage gain magnitude

of 4, Zi = 3.37 kΩ, Zo = 3 kΩ, and Z o = 2kΩ. Assume that the transistor is silicon

with 100 , hie = 1 kΩ, ro = 1/hoe ≈ ∞ Ω, and RE 10R2 .

VCC 20V

R1

RC C

C

Io

RS

Vs

Ii CS

Zi

Vi

Zb

R2

Zo

RE

Vo

Zo RL

Fig. 6-11

46

Av o 4 RE 0.5kΩ .

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Solution:

RC Zo 3kΩ , Z o RL RC 2k RL 3k RL 6kΩ .

Z 2

RE RE

Example 6-3:

Complete the design of the BJT amplifier circuit shown in Fig. 6-12 for a voltage

gain of 125, Zo = 2.4 kΩ, Zo = 2 kΩ. Assume that 0.985 , |VBE| = 0.7 V, and

ro = 1/hob ≈ ∞ Ω. Calculate Avs , and Vo.

VCC 9V

RC

CC

Vs

RS

20Ω

10mV

CS

Zi

Zo

Vi RE

VEE 4V

Vo

Zo

RL

Fig. 6-12

47

Zo

Zo

Vo RE

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

Exercises:

1. For each one of the circuits shown in Fig. 6-13, write a mathematical expression

to determine each of the following parameters by using hybrid or re equivalent

model.

(a) Zb and Zi. (b) Zo and Z o . (c) Ai and Av.

VCC

VCC

RS

Vs

Ii CS

Zi

Vi

RF1

CF

RF 2

Zb

RC

RE

CE

CC Io

Vo

Zo RL

RS

Vs

Ii CS

Zi

Vi

R1

Zb

R2

Io

Zo RL

(a) (b)

Fig. 6-13

48

Vi RE

VEE

3kΩ V R

University of Missan BJT Small-Signal Analysis Electrical Engineering Department Second Year, Electronics I I, 2015 - 2016 Maab Alaa Hussain

2. For the common-base amplifier of Fig. 6-14, determine the following parameters

using the complete hybrid equivalent model and compare the results to these

obtained using the approximate model.

(a) Zb and Zi. (b) Zo and Z o . (c) Ai and Avs . (d) Ai and Ais .

Ii

CS

hie 1.6kΩ

hre 2 104

h fe 110

hoe 20S

CC

Io

RS 1kΩ

Vs

Zi

Zb

3kΩ

6V

RC

VCC

Zo

12V

o

L

Zo

8.2kΩ

Fig. 6-14

3. Complete the design of the BJT amplifier circuit shown in Fig. 6-15 for a voltage

gain magnitude of 205, Zi =1.5k Ω, and Z o = 3.2 kΩ. Assume that 100 ,

VBE = 0.7 V, RF1/RF2 =1.95, and ro = 1/hoe ≈ ∞ Ω. Sketch Vo to the same time

scale as Vs.

VCC

10V

RF1

RF 2

RC

CC Io

Vs

RS Ii CS

1kΩ

2Sinwt mV

Zi

Vi

CF

Zb

Zo

Vo

Zo RL

Fig. 6-15

49