Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Applications of Terminology Standards for Performance Measurement, Clinical Decision Support, and Analysis
Daniella Meeker, PhD
Reference terminologies, interface terminologies- roles and how they complement each other
Overview
• Terminology in the Learning Health System • Uses of Standard Terminologies
– Billing and Payment – Analysis and Discovery – Performance Measurement – Decision Support
Problem centered care delivery. June Bronnert, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P; Chip Masarie, MD; Frank Naeymi-Rad, PhD, MBA; Eric Rose, MD, FAAFP; and Greg Aldin
Terminology in the “Learning Health System”
Ability to combine data from knowlegebases and databases to improve quality of care and knowledge discovery and dissemination - Clinical Trials and “Pragmatic” Trials - Health Services Research - Comparative Effectiveness Research - Safety Surveillance - Implementation Science
Reference Data Model
Extracted Data Set
(“Flat File”)
Data Set Extraction Program
Analysis Program
Estimated Predictive
Model
Terminology mapping for “computable phenotype” or
“inclusion criteria” or “measure denominator”
research
Patient Record
Predictive Model Computation
Standardized Extracted Record
Patient Centered Prediction
Publish
care
Publish
Record Processing Program
CCD
Billing
Payers reimburse for procedures that are justified by diagnosis codes
– Procedure codes tend to be well-specified in a single terminology if they are captured
– Diagnosis codes are tuned with billing standards in mind • Data Capture Interface – Physician-friendly codes or
free text – Most of the discrete code system vendors include
mappings to reference and billing terminologies • Billing Submission – ICD-10-CM
– Laboratory codes and values are not tuned, but poorly standardized
– Orders tend to be well-coded, particularly drug orders
Interpreting Coded Data
Transactional clinical data cannot be interpreted without substantial information about context. The same codes captured in different contexts correspond to different concepts. The absence of codes is also dependent on context. - e.g. 250.01 inpatient vs. outpatient - versioning metadata
- versions of code systems - versions of maps between systems (esp. interface
and billing systems) - autocoded vs. manually coded - HMO vs. FFS changes coding practices
Analysis & Discovery
• Algorithms used to define inclusion criteria for clinical trials enable streamlined screening and recruiting
• Algorithms used to define variables in data sets enable observational analysis of large data sets
• Algorithms that assign clinical concepts based on sequence of billing transactions – Billing transactions ≠ clinical history
The “Computable Phenotype”
Performance Measurement
• Chart Abstraction • Billing Data • Electronic Clinical Quality Measures • Encoding Rules
Example: Annual breast cancer screening for women over 55 that have not had bilateral mastectomy
Human Readable Logic
Value Set Authority Center
• National Library of Medicine maintains and provides interfaces for groups of codes that correspond to clinical concepts.
• Maintenance, mapping, change management processes
Decision Support Alerts
Guideline: Annual breast cancer screening for women over 55 that have not had bilateral mastectomy Implementation: Point of care decision support alerts…
15
IMPROVES CARE QUALITY
REDUCES CARE QUALITY Adapted from Bright, 2012
Informatics-based QI interventions have mixed results
ONC Clinical Quality Framework
Conclusions
• Standardized terminology has enabled substantial generation of evidence
• Products that leverage standards need extensive maintenance
• Application and implementation of products that leverage standards also requires attention
Courtesy: MF Walji
Harmonization Reference Set(s)